investor presentation · presentation in respect of its contents and the company is not acting in...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Public Company Limited
Investor presentation
November 2017
2
Disclaimer
This presentation has is the sole responsibility of the directors of Urals Energy PCL (the “Company”). This presentation does not constitute a recommendation regarding the
shares of the Company nor a representation that any dealing in those shares is appropriate. The Company accepts no duty of care whatsoever to the reader of this
presentation in respect of its contents and the Company is not acting in any fiduciary capacity. The information contained in the presentation has not been verified, nor does
this presentation purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information that an investor may desire to have in evaluating whether or not to make an investment in the
Company.
No offer or invitation or solicitation of any offer to acquire securities of the Company is being made in connection with this presentation nor does this presentation constitute or
form part of any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity under section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. No reliance may be placed for any
purpose whatsoever on the information contained in this presentation or any assumptions made as to its completeness and no warranty or representation is given by or on
behalf of the Company nor its directors, employees, agents, Allenby Capital and other advisers as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in
this presentation and no liability is accepted by any of them for any such information or opinions, provided that nothing in this paragraph shall exclude liability for any
representation or warranty made fraudulently. The information and opinions contained in this presentation are provided as at the date hereof.
The contents of this presentation must not be copied, published, reproduced, distributed or passed in whole or in part to others at any time by recipients, in particular to United
States residents, corporations, or other entities, US persons (as defined in Regulation S promulgated under the United States Securities Act of 1933 (as amended), persons
with addresses in the United States of America (or any of its territories or possessions), Canada, Japan, the Republic of Ireland, the Republic of South Africa or Australia, or to
any corporation, partnership or other entity created or organised under the laws thereof, or in any other country outside the United Kingdom where such distribution may lead
to a breach of any law or regulatory requirement.
This Presentation or documents referred to in it contain forward-looking statements. These statements relate to the future prospects developments and business strategies of
the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Group”). Forward-looking statements are identified by the use of such terms as “believe”, “could”, “envisage”, “estimate”, “potential”,
“intend”, “may”, “plan”, “will” or the negative of those, variations or comparable expressions, including references to assumptions. The forward-looking statements contained in
this Presentation are based on current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by those statements. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialises, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Group’s actual results may vary
materially from those expected, estimated or projected. Given these risks and uncertainties, potential investors should not place any reliance on forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this Presentation.
3 November 2017
3
Urals Energy Public Company Limited
Company Cyprus-based E&P holding company
Country of operations Russian Federation
Assets 6 E&P licenses:
- North on Kolguyev island (2
licenses) - Arcticneft
- East on Sakhalin island (2
licenses) - Petrosakh
- Komi Republic (2 licenses)
Current production (average) 2,148 BOPD (1H 2017)
Exchange AIM, London (IPO in August 2005)
Ticker UEN
Shares outstanding 12,622,303
4
Area of operations
Moscow
Komi
5
Group structure 2017
Management and Oil Marketing
Urals Energy Public
Company Limited
Cyprus
Arcticneft
100%
Kolguev Island,
Barents Sea
BVN Oil
100%
Komi Republic
RK Oil
100%
Komi Republic
Arctic Oil Co
100%
Kolguev Island,
Barents Sea
Petrosakh
98.56%
Sakhalin Island
6
Group expansion – taking advantage of depressed valuations
Arcticneft
37.0
Petrosakh
7.6
1 January 2014 Miller & Lents
reserve report establishes 2P
reserves at 44.6 MM Bbl’s
Arcticneft
license
expansion
10.3
BVN
acquisition
14.9
2015 acquisitions plus expansions
add 25.2 MM Bbl’s * C1 & C2 reserves
plus resource credit at RK Oil
South Dagi
auction
17.7
AKN
acquisition
16.0
2016 acquisitions add 33.7 MM Bbl’s * C1 &
C2 reserves
* Note that Russian reserve classification for ABC1 & ABC2 are different
in methodology from the standards employed by Miller & Lents in their 2P
report and are not strictly comparable.
Average Price Paid
for New C1 & C2 Reserves
in 2015-2016
Equals $0.16 per Bbl
7
Assets overview
8
Petrosakh is a Russian closed joint stock company, incorporated in July 1991 to develop the
Okruzhnoe field on the eastern coast of Sakhalin Island
UEN acquired its ownership interest (98.56%) in Petrosakh on 19 November 2004. The
remaining minority ownership (1.44%) interest is held by the Sakhalin Oil Company
E&P License was renewed in 2012 until 2037. Total reserves at 30/06/2017 was:
– Russian classification BC1+C2 – 3.2 mln. tons (23.7 MMbbl)
– 2P reserves Miller & Lents (based on report dated 01/01/2014) – 7.2 MMbbl
In June 2016 Petrosakh was awarded a 25 year exploration and development license for the
South Dagi oil field on Sakhalin Island.C1+C2 reserves (Russian classification) of the new field
– 2.4 mln. tons (17.7 MMbbl)
Operates the only refinery on the island (c.4,200 bopd)
Premium quality, light oil (36.5 – 37.5°API) with low paraffin (1.08%) and sulphur (0.24%).
Crude sold with US$2-3/bbl premium to Dubai benchmark
HSE
– 300 employees
– Operations are in compliance with Russian safety standards and HSE regulations
Production of Petrosakh stands at a level of 1,116 BOPD (1H 2017)
All produced oil is processed and refined products are sold on the domestic market (Sakhalin
Island)
Petrosakh field and
refinery
Petrosakh - Overview
9
In-house drilling and oil field services – Equipment and machinery: 1 rig with a capacity of 100 tons (development
and sidetracking drilling up to 2000m) and 1 new rig a capacity of 180 tons (development and sidetracking drilling up to 3000m)
The only refinery on the island – Refining capacity of c.4,200 bopd with opportunity to expand – Wide range of oil products - producing diesel, gasoline, kerosene and fuel
oil
Additional flexibility – Oil processing facility with capacity of c.8,300 bopd – Export crude oil storage capacity of 300,000 bbl and an oil product
storage capacity of 64,000 bbl – Rail terminal and oil products tank farm facilities with capacity of 30,000
bbl in Yuzhno - Sakhalinsk – Existing storage facilities provide for accumulation of production all year
round
International sea terminal with direct access to export routes – Renewable license for handling hazardous goods, including oil and oil
products – Suitable for loading/unloading operations – Access for oil tankers from 6,000 to 30,000 ton deadweight – Allows export of up to 100% of crude and refined products – Cost effective option to upgrade to allow export of high margin refined
products
Petrosakh – Existing infrastructure
10
2017
Upstream
– Current well stock:
– Total 26 producing wells incl:
– 2 gas lift
– 3 natural flow
– 21 artificial lift
– Drill 1 step-out well and perform two well work-overs at South Dagi field
– Optimization of waterflooding and well servicing
– Develop and implement workover program to maintain production rate
Downstream
– Increase capacity utilization of refinery via possible increase of own production and third party processing
– Explore opportunities in higher margin export and domestic markets for refined products
– Further oil product marking strategy optimization - small wholesale market development
– Flexibility to sell all product domestically or gasoil to be sold locally on the island and the rest to compound for export
– Upgrade of refinery equipment to increase refinery yield and facilitate production of new products (gasoline 95 and
bitumen)
– Obtain marine terminal license to permit the sale of bunker fuel – a new higher margin use of the refinery’s heavy
residual product
Petrosakh – Development strategy
11
Arcticneft is a Russian closed joint stock company incorporated in 1998 in order to develop
the Peschanoozerskoe field (eastern and western parts)
UEN acquired 100% of Arcticneft in July 2005
E&P License valid till 31.12.2067. Total reserves at 30/06/2017 was (w/o license extension
and new acquisition):
– Russian classification BC1+C2 – 8.6 mln.tons (68.3 MMbbl)
– 2P reserves Miller & Lents (based on report dated 01/01/2014) – 36.8 MMbbl
In October 2015 the Company expanded the boundaries of the license area, followed by
increasing reserves base ABC1 by 1.3 mln.tons (10.3 MMbb)
In August 2016 Arcticneft purchased the entire share capital of Arctic Oil Company Limited
(ANK). ANK has an R&D license for the development of the central part of the
Peschanoozerskoe oil field C1+C2 reserves 2.0 mln. tons (16.0 MMbbl)
Located with direct route to European markets
High quality, light oil (46.7°API) with low sulphur content (0.075%)
Crude sold with an average premium of US$ 1.0 - 1.8/bbl to Brent
HSE
– 131 employees
– Associated gas is fully utilized
– Operations are in compliance with Russian safety standards and HSE regulations
Production of Arcticneft stands at a level of 1,061 BOPD (Q4 2016).
Additional average production from newly acquired assets 348 BOPD
Arcticneft - Overview
12
Downstream
– Oil refining unit, c.440 bopd
– Produces diesel, fuel oil and straight run gasoline
mostly for own needs and local sales points
Flexible facilities and infrastructure
– Oil treatment facility with capacity of 2,205 bopd
– Export crude oil storage capacity of 555,000 bbl and
oil product storage capacity of 50,000 bbl (including
oil storage capacity of newly acquired assets)
– Existing storage facilities allow accumulation of
production year round
Two sea loading points provides 100% export
capability
– Located directly off the coast and adjacent to the
field’s crude oil tank farm
– Allows Oil tankers up to 45,000 ton deadweight
Arcticneft – Existing infrastructure
13
Well Work Service Units
– APRS 40 – with rated capacity up to 40 tonnes – UPA 60/80 – with rated capacity up to 80 tonnes
Russian-made drilling rig «Uralmash-3D-76» – max depth of 5,000 m – provides options for exploration and production well drilling – capacity up to 260 tonnes – located on the field
Reservoir Pressure Maintenance System – water from an aquifer system of Middle Triassic deposits
containing high-pressure waters – water wells depth 1,300-1,400 m equipped with bottom-hole
pumps
Arcticneft – E&P Capability
14
2017
Well stock (Arcticneft)
- Total 27 active wells
- 3 free flow
- Artificial lift from most of the wells
Well stock (Arctic Oil Company)
- Total 27 active wells
- 2 free flow
- Artificial lift from most of the wells
Complex development and optimization of workover program, reactivation of idle production wells, development of an
effective program of geological, technical procedures and pressure maintenance (including newly acquired well stock of ANK)
Assessment of well stock efficiency of newly acquired property ANK plus re-entry of two idle wells
Installation of 8 jack pumps and implementation of work-over program to maintain stable production level
Modeling and assessment of fraccing potential for production rates, subject to favorable market conditions
Two export shipments (in June and October 2017) plus marine terminal cost minimization upgrade
*without newly acquired company
Arcticneft – Development strategy
15
RK Oil LLC incorporated in 2014 in order to develop the
Ordymsky license area which is located within the well-known
Omra-Soyvinskomu petroleum district in the Timan-Pechora oil
and gas province
E&P License valid till 31.12.2040
UEN acquired 100% of RK Oil in November 2015
Estimated recoverable oil reserves (C3 – possible) is 35.9
million tons (265.6 MMbbl)
Located with direct route to European markets and refinery
facilities:
– Refinery plant (Ukhta) – 150 km
– Transneft pipeline – 80 km
– Railroad station – 12 km
2017 planned work: interpretation of seismic and workover of
the existing well, drilling one exploration well
RK Oil - Overview
16
BVN Oil LLC incorporated in 2013 in order to develop the
Babaevsky license area, located within the well-known Velhiu-
Tebukskogo petroleum district in the Timan-Pechora oil and gas
province
2 licenses
– Exploration License valid till 31.12.2021
– E&P License valid till 31.12.2036
UEN acquired 100% of BVN Oil in November 2015
Recoverable oil reserves (C1+C2) is 2.2 million tons (16.3
MMbbl)
Exploration well was drilled in 2014-2015 which gave oil inflow
approx. 130 BOPD
Located with direct route to European markets and refinery
facilities:
– Refinery plant (Ukhta) – 70 km
– Transneft pipeline – 60 km
– Railroad station – 18 km
– Regional pipeline – within the plot
2017 planned work: interpretation of seismic, study and treatment
of all available geological and geophysical data
BVN Oil
BVN Oil - Overview
17
RK Oil & BVN Oil Development strategy
2017
Seismic re-interpretation of two oil fields to evaluate possible license area extensions
Drill 1 well and perform one work-over in RK-Oil accompanied by field infrastructure development
Field infrastructure development
Approval of field development plan for RK-Oil
*without newly acquired company
Petrosakh
RK Oil
BVN Oil
additional seismic interpretation for the two oil fields held by RK Oil and BVN Oil
following the cancelation of the first drilling contract at RK Oil, seek a partnership, ideally with a
major oil service company to manage the development of the large proven and probable reserves,
potentially coordinated with adjacent oil fields that have necessary infrastructure and transit
connections
Arcticneft
continue well work overs at Petrosakh, thus seeking to maintain production at approximately
1,200 bbls/day
upgrade refinery equipment to increase the yield and quality of products
obtain a marine terminal licence for the sale of bunker fuel to local ship operators
deploy newly acquired rig to drill three wells at our new South Dagi licence
workover two existing wells on South Dagi
continue work overs and the installation of jack pumps with the aim of keeping production
stable at approximately 1,000 bbls/day
assessment of a new programme of deviated wells and or fracking to increase production
significantly from existing horizons, and in the case of success;
apply for additional licences on the Island, in order to take advantage of our unique position as
the only operator with processing, tank farm availability and its own tanker terminals
18
Strategy overview 2018
19
Financials
20
1 July 2016 – 30 June 2017
Barrels of oil produced 716,365 782,936
Revenue per barrel of oil produced
(adjusted for inventory) $61.37 $38.68
Gross profit per barrel produced $9.91 $10.45
EBITDA per barrel produced $11.47 $12.01
Operating cash flow per barrel produced $10.18 $12.05
Net debt to EBITDA ratio 1.4 x 1.1 x
Operations
Income Statement
Cash Flow Statement
Balance Sheet
Comparison of Results - 12 Months Ending 30/6/17 vs. 30/6/16
Growing production
through development
plus acquisitions
Stable gross profit and
EBITDA fundamentals
despite reduced prices
and increased tax
burden
Focused on cash
efficiency enhanced by
USD revenues versus
RUR costs
Borrowing to smooth
irregular shipments
remains at prudent level
Key metrics
Net cash used in investing activities $4.3 m $9.0 m
1 July 2015 – 30 June 2016
21
Financial results
• Net revenue is determined by several main factors: the level of production / processing, export oil prices and domestic prices
for petroleum products, FX value of the rouble and tax regime for oil and gas companies
• Despite the natural decline in production, high netbacks (price minus the export duty, excise taxes and transportation costs)
especially on the local refined products market allowed UEN to obtain stable gross profit and EBITDA
• The major part of net finance income / (expenses) is caused by multidirectional exchange rate fluctuations. This is a virtual
figure as it relates to intercompany loans nominated in US dollars
$‘000 30.06.2017 31.12.2016 30.06.2016 31.12.2015 30.06.2015
Net revenues 22 433 29 052 7 525 27 213 7 214
Gross profit/(loss) 2 819 7 257 2 318 7 115 1 950
Operating profit/(loss) (211) 2 046 592 3 337 (57)
Management EBITDA 3 433 7 773 2 226 7 743 1 323
EBITDA margin 15% 27% 30% 28% 18%
Total net finance income/(expense) (212) 3 898 3 317 (7 590) 282
Profit/(loss) for the period (759) 8 001 3 411 (4 055) (48)
22
Cash and Net Debt
• Decrease in operating cash flow in US$ is a results of high volatility in oil prices and FOREX rates during the last years, increase
in tax burden and increase in costs of materials (mainly cost of a newer additive, which is required in order to be compliant with
the ‘EURO-5’ requirement).
• In 2016 the Company entered into an 18 month revolving credit facility for working capital financing with the Sakhalin branch of
OJSC Sberbank for 300 mln. RR (approx. $4.6 million) and in 2017 the Company entered into 24 month non-revolving CAPEX
credit facility with OJSC Sberbank for 50 mln. RR (approx. $0.9 million)
• In conjunction with the acquisition of ANK the Company entered into an additional short-term loan form
Kamchatcomagroprombank which amounted to approximately $1.7 million as at 30 June 2017
• The Company traditionally enters into a short-term working capital loan (approx. 2-3 months pre-export financing) with Petraco
Oil Company ltd (the trader of Arcticneft)
$'000 30.06.2017 31.12.2016 30.06.2016 31.12.2015 30.06.2015
Cash 401 1 202 2 591 1 695 1 499
Loans receivable 521 442 461 808
Loans payable (13 169) (6 792) (12 657) (3 935) (7 288)
Net Cash (Debt) (12 247) (5 148) (9 605) (2 240) (4 981)
Operating cash flows before changes in working capital 2 814 8 134 2 974 7 860 2 202
Urals Energy Value and Performance vs the AIM E&P
Market and Russian Peer Group
Q3 2017
Summary
Urals remains one of the highest ranked E&P companies (4th) on the AIM market by 2P Reserves
Russian 2P Reserves volumes dominate the AIM E&P sector and continue to trade at a significant discount
to the market average
Urals generates more operating cash flow per barrel produced than its AIM listed peers
Urals 2P Reserves trade at a discount to the market and its regional Russian and FSU peer groups
Urals have continued to outperform its Russian peer group during 2017
Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 30th October 2017
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41
42 42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
40
18
4
2P EV Prod
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
Urals AIM E&P Market Ranking Q3 2017
0 – 25
25 – 50
Percentile
50 – 75
75 – 100
Negative
40 Market Rank
EV: Enterprise Value
Prod: Production
2P: 2P Reserves
1Average for companies with production 2Average for companies with reserves 3Average for companies with resources
Urals Russia Market
Number of companies 4 78
Production1 (boepd) 2,057 3,316 2,440
2P Reserves2 (mmboe) 104 105 30
2C Resources3 (mmboe) 0 1 83
2P Reserves EV $ / boe 0.2 0.3 4.8
• AIM E&P Market Ranking un-changed since Q2
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41
42 42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Urals Petroneft Volga Zoltav
Enterprise Value £ 18 13 40 38
Production (boepd) 2,057 1,100 2,698 7,408
2P Reserves
(mmboe) 104 66 39 210
EV change1 % 4 -28 27 -28
SHR change1 % -7 -29 23 -36
EV/SHR:1 : Enterprise Value & Share holder returns for first 9 months of 2017
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
Urals AIM Russian Peer Group Ranking Q3 2017
2P EV Prod
0 – 25
25 – 50
Percentile
50 – 75
75 – 100
Negative
EV: Enterprise Value
Prod: Production
2P: 2P Reserves
8% 7%
17%
0%
16% 5%
36%
10%
UK
Europe
SS Africa
MENA
America
Former Soviet Union
Russia
Far East
13%
5%
13%
12%
29%
5% 2%
22%
(27)
(16)
(12)
(7)
(4)
(4)
(4)
AIM Enterprise Value / Region Q3 2017
(4)
(27)
(4)
(7)
(16)
(4) Number of
companies
(4)
(12)
AIM 2P Reserves / Region Q3 2017
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
Russian Reserves are Trading at a Discount to the AIM E&P Market
(4)
(4)
Note: FSU excluding Russian focused companies
Regional Value of 2P Reserves & 2C Resource (EV $ / BOE) Q3 2017
0.7 6.6
3.2
0.3
7.1
2.0
9.9
10.6
1.8
0.2
2.9
1.1
5.0 0.2
2.0
2C Resources + associated 2P
2P Reserves
Enterprise Value ($) / BOE
Russian AIM Reserves are Trading at a Discount to Other Regions
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
Urals 2P Reserves Trading Value per Barrel vs the AIM E&P Market and
Russian Company Peer Group, Q3 2017
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
4.8
AIM
0.3
Russia
0.2
Urals
En
terp
ris
e V
alu
e (
$)
/ b
oe
0.5
Russia +
Exillon
Urals Reserves are Trading at a Discount to the AIM E&P Market
* Includes all AIM listed Russian E&P companies and Exillon trading on the main market
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
4.8
AIM
3.2
FSU1
0.5
Russia2
0.2
Urals
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 24 Oct 2017
Urals Reserves are Trading at a Discount to the AIM E&P Market
and its Regional Peer Groups
Urals 2P Reserves Trading Value per Barrel vs the AIM E&P Market FSU
and Russian Company Peer Group, Q3 2017
En
terp
ris
e V
alu
e (
$)
/ b
oe
FSU1 : Excludes Russian focused companies, Includes: Frontera, Regal, Ascent, Caspian Sunrise, Zenith, JKX, Nostrum, Reach Energy
Russia2 = Zoltav, Volga, Petroneft, Urals, Exillon
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.6
Exillon*
0.3
Petroneft
Va
lue
($
) / b
oe
Zoltav
0.2
* Listed on London main market – not part of Urals AIM peer group
0.2
Urals Volga
1.4
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
Urals Reserves are Trading at a Discount to its Russian Peer Group
Urals 2P Reserves Trading Value per Barrel vs its Russian Peer Group, Q3 2017
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000
2P
re
se
rve
s (
mm
BO
E)
Production (BOE/d)
Urals Value vs Reserves & Production vs its Russian Peer Group
Q3 1017
Zoltav, £38
Volga, £40
Urals, £18
Petroneft, £13
Exillon, £223
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 28 Oct 2017
Bubble Size =
Enterprise Value
Source: Company interim reports Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 28 Oct 2017
17,3
7,2 6,4
5,5
-1,0
-5,0
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
EXILLON ENERGY URALS EN. VOLGA GAS ZOLTAV RES PETRONEFT
Urals Generates More Cash per Barrel than Most of its Peers
Op
era
tin
g C
as
h F
low
($
) /
bo
e
Operating Cash Flow $ / boe Before Working Capital Changes H1 2017
Historic Performance Bench Marking
Urals Has Out Performed its Peer Group in 2017
4
Number of
companies
AIM E&P companies 75-78
Russia
Urals Energy
Source: LSE, E&P Company reports, presentations Analysts: C Barnes, R Jones, H Luscombe, J Bedford Date: 17 Oct 2017
Note: Share holder returns corrected for share consolidations
Urals Performance vs the AIM E&P Market & Russian Peer Group Q4
2016 – Q3 1017
-7%
4%
-11%
-8% -9%
-30%
-0,3% -3%
-7%
21%
4%
23%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Shareholder Returns Enterprise Value Production 2P Reserves 2C Resources
36
Appendix
Urals Operating Cash Flow / Barrel Produced Russian Peer Group – H1 2017
Source: Company 2017 interim reports Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 28 Oct 2017
Operating Cash flow per barrel
Company 6 Month Production (boe) Operating Cash Flow
before WC changes ($mm)
Operating Cash Flow after
WC changes1 ($mm)
Operating Cash Flow
before WC changes per
Produced Barrel ($)
Operating Cash Flow after
WC changes per Produced
Barrel ($)
EXILLON ENERGY 2,010,000 34.7 25.7 17.3 12.8
URALS EN. 388,889 2.8 -3.7 7.2 -9.6
VOLGA GAS 1,128,215 7.2 3.2 6.4 2.8
ZOLTAV RES 1,365,100 7.5 6.2 5.5 4.6
PETRONEFT 428,328 -0.4 -0.2 -1.0 -0.4
1 Operating Cash flow after WC Changes = Net Cash generated/used in operating activities
Source: Company interim reports Analysts: C Barnes, J Bedford Date: 28 Oct 2017
12,8
4,6 2,8
-0,4
-9,6 -15,0
-10,0
-5,0
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
EXILLON ENERGY ZOLTAV RES VOLGA GAS PETRONEFT URALS EN.
Operating Cash Flow $ / boe After Working Capital Changes H1 2017
17,3
7,2 6,4 5,5
-1,0 -5,0
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
EXILLON ENERGY URALS EN. VOLGA GAS ZOLTAV RES PETRONEFT
Operating Cash Flow $ / boe Before Working Capital Changes H1 2017
Urals Operating Cash Flow / Barrel Produced vs its Russian Peer Group – H1 2017
Urals Delivered Top Quartile Share Holder Returns Performance in 2016
• Urals Energy was ranked 51st by MC at the beginning of Q1 2016.
• Urals rank by share holder returns for the year Q1 2016 - Q1 2017
was 13
• Urals delivered increased shareholder value of 156%
Company Value by
MC1 Q1 2016
Shareholder Returns2
Q1 2016 – Q1 2017
Source: Company web sites & LSE
Last up dated: May 2017
Analyst: C Barnes, R Jones, J Bedford
H Luscombe
Urals
Energy
1MC= Market Capitalisation – colours highlight market value quartiles 2AIM E&P Companies ranked by % annual shareholder returns, corrected for
share consolidations
(-1) – (-20)%
(-20) – (-40)%
1 – 20%
20 – 40%
40 – 100%
>500
100 – 500%
>(-40)%
40
Board and Management
Andrew Shrager, Non-Executive Chairman, is a private investor with a wealth of experience in investment banking. Some of his main roles have included:
senior adviser at Renaissance Capital (emerging markets); senior advisor to Merrill Lynch (Energy & Power group throughout Russia and Central Europe);
director of corporate finance at Lazard Brothers. Between 2001 and 2012 Andrew was a director of Utilyx, one of the UK’s leading specialists in energy and
carbon, and between 2007 and 2010, he was a director of GeoDynamics Research. Since 2012, Andrew has held the position of CEO at GeoDynamics
Worldwide, an international oil service and investment company.
Leonid Dyachenko, CEO, one the founding shareholders of Urals, has been involved with UEN from 2001 and held positions of vice president, general
director of Urals Russia, Chairman of the Board and CEO. Prior to UEN he was involved in a number of business ventures including energy, transportation,
pharmaceuticals etc.
Sergei Uzornikov, CFO, has an extensive financial experience in oil and gas and power generation sectors. He started his career in PwC’s audit practice
and after that has held senior positions in Yukos Oil Company, Lundin Petroleum Group and Enel OGK-5. Mr. Uzornikov graduated from Moscow State
Institute of international relations and the Skolkovo executive MBA program.
Stephen Buscher, Non-Executive Director, as then CFO was instrumental in the success of the UEN listing on AIM in 2005. In 2007 he took up the Chief
Financial Officer role at Terralliance Technologies, an oil and gas exploration company privately owned by Goldman Sachs and Kleiner Perkins. Stephen
has recently been with the investment company Sistema as Executive Vice President investment strategy, and the Chief Executive Officer of Navitas Global
Resources, the foreign project and exploration division and wholly-owned subsidiary of RussNeft and serves on the Boards of Mina Petroleum a US DoD
fuel supplier, Sirius Energy a Mexican mid-stream operator and Shock Energy a US DOE technology contractor.