ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii born haber cycles

59
Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles • explaining formulae, why AlO is incorrect – polarisation Metallic Bonding • Covalency electron density maps giant atomic structures dot-cross diagrams shapes of molecules • VSEPR – electronegativity polarity of covalent bonds polarity of molecules Intermolecular forces trends in physical properties Solutions and dissolving why certain substances dissolve in particular solvents

Upload: edda

Post on 16-Jan-2016

83 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles explaining formulae, why AlO is incorrect polarisation Metallic Bonding. Covalency electron density maps giant atomic structures dot-cross diagrams shapes of molecules VSEPR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

• Ionic bonding– evidence for ionic

bonding, electron density maps

– trends in radii

– Born Haber cycles• explaining formulae,

why AlO is incorrect

– polarisation

• Metallic Bonding

• Covalency– electron density maps

– giant atomic structures

– dot-cross diagrams

– shapes of molecules • VSEPR

– electronegativity

– polarity of covalent bonds

– polarity of molecules

• Intermolecular forces– trends in physical properties

• Solutions and dissolving– why certain substances dissolve in particular solvents

Page 2: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Na

Mg Al

Si

PS

ClAr

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Tem

per

atu

re /K

Melting Points of Period 3 elements

Page 3: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Melting Points of Period 2 elements

Li

Be

B

C

N O F Ne0

1000

2000

3000

4000

Tem

pera

ture

/ K

Page 4: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Ionic bonding

• The electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions– Metals, hydrogen and ammonium form positive

ions (cations).– Non-metals form negative ions (anions).

Page 5: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Evidence for ionic compounds• High melting points

– strong electrostatic attractions between oppositely charged ions

• Electrical conductivity only in liquid state or aqueous solution because ions need to move.

• Coloured ions can be observed migrating to electrodes during electrolysis (e.g. CuCr2O7)

– green / blue Cu2+ (aq) moves to cathode

– yellow Cr2O72- (aq) moves to anode

• Electron density maps show low electron density between the oppositely charged ions.

Page 6: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

NaCl (s)

Na (s) + ½ Cl2 (g)

Na+ (g) + e- + Cl (g)

Na+ (g) + Cl- (g)

Hformation = - 411.2 kJ mol-1

Na (g) + ½ Cl2 (g)

m1[Na] = + 496 kJ mol-1

Eaff[Cl] = - 348.8 kJ mol-1

Hlatt (=348.8-121.7-496-107.3-411.2)

= - 787.4 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for sodium chloride

Hat = + 107.3 kJ mol-1

Na+ (g) + e- + ½ Cl2 (g)

Hat [Cl]= + 121.7 kJ mol-1

Page 7: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

KCl (s)

K (s) + ½ Cl2 (g)

K+ (g) + e- + Cl (g)

K+ (g) + Cl- (g)

Hformation = - 436.7 kJ mol-1

K (g) + ½ Cl2 (g)

m1[K] = + 419 kJ mol-1

Eaff[Cl] = - 348.8 kJ mol-1

Hlatt (=348.8-121.7-419-89.2-436.7)

= - 717.8 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for potassium chloride

Hat = + 89.2 kJ mol-1

K+ (g) + e- + ½ Cl2 (g)

Hat [Cl]= + 121.7 kJ mol-1

Page 8: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

KBr (s)

K (s) + ½ Br2 (l)

K+ (g) + e- + Br (g)

K+ (g) + Br - (g)

Hformation = - 393.8 kJ mol-1

K (g) + ½ Br2 (l)

Em1[K] = + 419 kJ mol-1

Eaff[Br] = - 324.6 kJ mol-1

Hlatt =(324.6-111.9-419-89.2-393.8)

= - 689.3 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for potassium bromide

Hat [K]= + 89.2 kJ mol-1

K+ (g) + e- + ½ Br2 (l)

Hat [Br]= + 111.9 kJ mol-1

Page 9: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Li2O (s)

2 Li (s) + ½ O2 (g)

2 Li+ (g) + 2 e- + O (g)

2 Li+ (g) + e- + O- (g)

Hformation = - 597.9 kJ mol-1

2 Li (g) + ½ O2 (g)

Em1[Li] = + 1040 kJ mol-1

Hlatt (=-798+141.1-249.2-1040-318.8-597.6)

= - 2862.8 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for lithium oxide

Hat = + 318.8 kJ mol-1

2 Li+ (g) + 2 e- + ½ O2 (g)

Hat [O]= + 249.2 kJ mol-1

2 Li+ (g) + O2- (g)

Eaff[O]= - 141.1 kJ mol-1

Eaff[O-] +798 kJ mol-1

Page 10: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Hat(Mg) = + 148 kJ mol-1

MgCl2 (s)

Mg (s) + Cl2 (g)

Mg2+ (g) + 2e- + 2 Cl (g)

Mg2+ (g) + 2 Cl- (g)

Hformation =+148+738+1451+243.4-679.6-2526

- 625.2 kJ mol-1

Mg (g) + Cl2 (g)

Em1[Mg] = + 738 kJ mol-1

aff [Cl] = - 697.6 kJ mol-1

Hlatt == - 2526 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for magnesium chloride

Mg+ (g) + e- + Cl2 (g)

Hat [Cl]= + 243.4 kJ mol-1

Mg2+ (g) + 2e- + Cl2 (g)

m2[Mg] = + 1451 kJ mol-1

Page 11: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

MgCl (s)Mg (s) + ½ Cl2 (g)

Mg+ (g) + e- + Cl (g)

Mg+ (g) + Cl- (g)

Mg (g) + ½ Cl2 (g)

m1[Mg] = + 738 kJ mol-1

Eaff[Cl] = - 348.8 kJ mol-1

Hformation[MgCl (s)] (=+148+738+121.7-248.8-780)

= - 21.1 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for MgCl

Hat = + 148 kJ mol-1

Mg+ (g) + e- + ½ Cl2 (g)

Hat [Cl]= + 121.7 kJ mol-1

Hlatt[MgCl (s)] = - 780 kJ mol-1

Page 12: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

MgCl3 (s)

Mg (s) + 3/2 Cl2 (g)

Mg3+ (g) + 3e- + 3 Cl (g)

Mg3+ (g) + 3 Cl- (g)

Hformation =+148+9927+366-1047-4500 = + 4894 kJ mol-1

Mg (g) + 3/2 Cl2 (g)

Em1+ Em2+Em3 [Mg]= (738+1451+7738) kJ mol-1

= + 9927 kJ mol-1

aff[Cl] = - 1047 kJ mol-1

Hlatt = - 4500 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for MgCl3

Hat = + 148 kJ mol-1

Mg3+ (g) + 3e- + 3/2 Cl2 (g)

Hat [1/2Cl2]= + 366 kJ mol-1

Page 13: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

CaI2 (s)

Ca (s) + I2 (g)

Ca2+ (g) + 2e- + 2 I (g)

Ca2+ (g) + 2 I- (g)

Hformation = - 533.5 kJ mol-1

Ca (g) + I2 (g)

Em1[Ca] = + 590 kJ mol-1

Eaff[I]= - 590.8 kJ mol-1

Hlatt =(590.8-214-1145-590-178.2-533.5)

= - 2069.9 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for Calcium iodide

Hat [Ca] = + 178.2 kJ mol-1

Ca+ (g) + e- + I2 (g)

Hat [I]= + 214 kJ mol-1

Ca2+ (g) + 2e- + I2 (g)

Em2[Ca] = + 1145 kJ mol-1

Page 14: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

MgO (s)

Mg (s) + ½ O2 (g)

Mg2+ (g) + 2 e- + O (g)

Mg2+ (g) + e- + O- (g)

Hformation = - 601.7 kJ mol-1

Mg (g) + ½ O2 (g)

Em1[Mg] = + 738 kJ mol-1

Eaff[O]= - 141.1 kJ mol-1

Hlatt = (-798+141.1-249.2-1451-738-147.7-601.7)

= - 3844.5 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for magnesium oxide

Mg+ (g) + e- + ½ O2 (g)

Hat [O]= + 249.2 kJ mol-1

Mg2+ (g) + 2 e- + ½ O2 (g)

m2[Mg] = + 1451 kJ mol-1

Eaff[O-] +798 kJ mol-1

Mg2+ (g) + O2- (g)

Hat(Mg) = + 147.7 kJ mol-1

Page 15: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

BF3 (s)

B (s) + 3/2 F2 (g)

B3+ (g) + 3e- + 3 F (g)

B3+ (g) + 3 F- (g)

Hformation = - 1504.1 kJ mol-1

B (g) + 3/2 F2 (g)

Em1+ Em2+Em3 [B]= (578+1817+2745) kJ mol-1

= + 5140 kJ mol-1

aff[F] = - 984 kJ mol-1

Hlatt (984-237-5140-326.4-1504.1)

= - 6223.5 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for Boron fluoride

Hat = + 326.4 kJ mol-1

B3+ (g) + 3e- + 3/2 F2 (g)

Hat [F]= + 237 kJ mol-1

Page 16: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Al2O3 (s)

2 Al (s) + 3/2 O2 (g)

2 Al3+ (g) + 6 e- + 3 O (g)

2 Al3+(g)+3e-+3O- (g)

Hformation = - 1675.7 kJ mol-1

3 Eaff[O]= - 423.3 kJ mol-1

Hlatt = (-2394+423.3-747.6-10280-652.8-1675.7)

= - 15 327 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for aluminium oxide

Hat [O]= + 747.6 kJ mol-1

2 Al3+ (g) + 3 e- + 3/2 O2 (g)

3 Eaff[O-] +2394 kJ mol-1

2 Al3+ (g) + 3 O2- (g)

Hat(Al) = + 652.8 kJ mol-1

2 Al (g) + 3/2 O2 (g)

2(Em1+ Em2+ Em3 )[Al]= 2(578+1817+2745) kJ mol-1

= + 10 280 kJ mol-1

Page 17: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

B2O3 (s)

2 B (s) + 3/2 O2 (g)

2 B3+ (g) + 6 e- + 3 O (g)

2 B3+(g)+3e-+3O- (g)

Hformation = - 1273 kJ mol-1

3 Eaff[O]= - 423.3 kJ mol-1

Hlatt = (-2394+423.3-747.6-13776-1025.4-1273)

= - 18 800 kJ mol-1

Ent

halp

y (H

)

Born Haber cycle for boron oxide

Hat [½ O2 (g)]= + 747.6 kJ mol-1

2 B3+ (g) + 3 e- + 3/2 O2 (g)

3 Eaff[O-] +2394 kJ mol-1

2 B3+ (g) + 3 O2- (g)

Hat(B) = + 1025.4 kJ mol-1

2 B (g) + 3/2 O2 (g)

2(Em1+ Em2+ Em3 )[B]= 2(801+2427+3660) kJ mol-1

= + 13 776 kJ mol-1

Page 18: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Lattice energiesLiF -1031 LiCl -848 BeO -4443 BeCl2 -3020

NaF -918 NaCl -780 MgO -3791 MgCl2 -2526

KF -817 KCl -711 CaO -3401 CaCl2 -2258

RbF -783 RbCl -685 SrO -3223 SrCl2 -2156

CsF -747 CsCl -661 BaO -3054 BaCl2 -2056

Page 19: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

AlO is not the formula of aluminium oxide

• Not Al2+ O2-

• Whilst successive ionisation energies of Al increase, Em3

is not especially large.• Al3+ is very much smaller than Al2+, since its 3rd

principal quantum shell is now empty.

• Consequently, the ions pack more tightly in (Al3+)2(O2-)3.

• Al3+ also carries a greater charge than Al2+,, increasing the

attraction to O2- anions.

• The lattice energy of (Al3+)2(O2-)3 is therefore much greater in magnitude than that of Al2+O2-.

Page 20: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

AlO is not the formula of aluminium oxide

• Not Al3+ O3-

• O3- would have a greater radius than O2- since its extra electron occupies a new principal quantum shell, further from the nucleus and more shielded by inner quantum shells.

• In spite of the increased charge of the O3- anion, its large size reduces packing density of the solid.

• The electron affinity required to form O3- from O2- would be large and endothermic.

• Therefore the lattice energy of Al3+O3- does not make up for the endothermic steps in the Born Haber cycle.

Page 21: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Polarisation of the anion

X+ Y-

X+ Y-

Page 22: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Factors leading to anion polarisation

• Cation polarizing power increases with– small radius (increasing charge density)– large positive charge (increasing charge density)

• Anion polarizability increases with– large radius (outer electrons far from nucleus and shielded by

inner shells)• increasing negative charge increases its size

• Increasing anion polarisation means increasing covalent character to the bonding– indicated by large difference between theoretical and

experimental lattice energies

Page 23: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Metallic bonding

• The attraction between 'positive ions' and a sea of delocalised electrons.

• Why does the melting point increase across a period, Na<Mg<Al?

• Electrical and thermal conductivity due to transfer of charge and energy by the movement of delocalised electrons.

Page 24: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

The covalent bond

• The attraction between two nuclei and a shared pair of electrons.

• One electron of the shared pair originating from each atom in a 'standard' covalent bond.

• Both electrons of the shared pair originate from the same atom in a dative bond.

• 'Standard' and dative covalent bonds are indistinguishable.

Page 25: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

H H

Hydrogen molecule (H2)

H-H

Page 26: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion• Sigma bond electron pairs and lone pairs all repel each

other around the central atom.

• The electron pairs move into positions of maximum separation.– 2 pairs gives 180: 3 pairs gives 120: 4 pairs gives 109.5, 6

pairs gives 90.

• Lone pairs have a greater repulsion than sigma bond pairs.– Each lone pair reduces the expected bond pair - bond pair

angle by about 2.5.

Page 27: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Chlorine molecule, Cl2

Cl Cl Cl-Cl

Page 28: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Hydrogen chloride molecule, HCl (g){not HCl (aq) which is ionic}

H-ClClH

Why is this covalent?

Page 29: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Water molecule, H2O

HH O

O

HH

109.5

Page 30: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

N N

Nitrogen molecule, N2

N N

Page 31: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Ammonia, NH3

HNH

H

N

H H H107

Page 32: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Methane, CH4

H

H

CH H

H

H HC

H

C

H

HHH

109.5

Page 33: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Ethane, C2H6

H C C HH H

H H

H H

HC

C

H

H

H

C

H

HHH3C

109.5

Page 34: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Ethene, C2H4

C

C

H

HH

H

C = CH

H H

H

121

118

Page 35: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

O = C = O

Carbon dioxide, CO2

O

O

C

Page 36: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

SH H

SH

H104

H2S

Page 37: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

109.5SiH H

H

H

Si

H

HHH

SiH4

Page 38: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

CH H

O

C

H

HO

120120

Methanal, HCHO

Page 39: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

CH N

H C N180

HCN

Page 40: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

H HO O

H

H104

104

O O

Page 41: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

NH H109.5

H

H

+

N

H

HHH +

Page 42: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

HO

-

Page 43: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

SO O109.5

O

O

S

O

OOO

2-

2-

Page 44: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

SS O109

O

O

2-

2-

S

O

OSO

Page 45: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Ethene

C

C

HHH

H • 3 -bond pairs around each C atom repel to positions of maximum separation.

• trigonal planar

C = C

H

H H

H121

118

Page 46: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Ethene

C CHH

HHC C

HH

H

H

C CHH

HH

bonds shown as lines and wedges

or

C CHH

H

H

Page 47: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Benzene, C6H6

neither

but

nor

Page 48: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Benzene

• bonding is delocalised over the whole ring because all 6 p orbitals are coplanar and overlap.– not 3 separate bonds

• Benzene is more stable than alkenes and tends to react by substitution rather than addition.

Page 49: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Pyrene, C16H10

Page 50: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Graphite

Flat sheet ofC atoms

Weak forces between sheets

Page 51: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

How to draw diamond

Page 52: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Diamond

Page 53: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Group VII hydrides

HF

HClHBr

HI

-200

-100

0

100

Group VI hydrides

H2TeH2Se

H2S

H2O

-200

-100

0

100

Group V hydrides

SbH3

AsH3

PH3

NH3

-200

-100

0

100

Group IV hydrides

SnH4

GeH4SiH4

CH4

-200

-100

0

100

Page 54: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

The ice structure

Page 55: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Dissolving an ionic solid

- HO H

HO H

H O

H

HO H

H

O H

+

HO H

HO H

HO H

HO H

+ (aq)

Page 56: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Dissolving

• Forces are broken between the particles within the solute and within the solvent

• The energy required to break these forces needs to come from new attractive interactions between solvent and solute particles.– If this energy is not supplied, the ‘solute’ does

not dissolve.

Page 57: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Dissolving (2)

• Non-polar molecules attract by London forces alone.

• Ionic solutes have strong electrostatic attractions between the ions.– The energy required to overcome the high lattice

energy can often be supplied through hydration of the ions by the highly polar water molecule

– Water can also hydrogen bond to polar solutes such as sugars and ethanol.

Page 58: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Dissolving (3)

• Water does not dissolve non-polar solutes.– Hydrogen bonds would need to be broken between solvent water

molecules.– This energy is not made up for by London forces between solvent

and solute molecules.

• Non-polar solvents dissolve non-polar solutes.– Little energy is required to break London forces between the solvent

molecules.– This energy is supplied by new London forces between solute and

solvent molecules.

Page 59: Ionic bonding evidence for ionic bonding, electron density maps trends in radii Born Haber cycles

Dissolving (4)

• Metals dissolve other metals

• Ionic solids (such as alumina) dissolve in ionic solvents (such as cryolite, Na3AlF6)