ip infrastructure for promotion of work sharing - japan’s perspective -
DESCRIPTION
IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective -. Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office. WIPO Global Symposium of Intellectual Property Authorities, 17and 18 September 2009. Contents. Growing Demand for Work Sharing Foundation Projects by IP5 Offices - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
IP Infrastructure IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharingfor Promotion of Work Sharing
- Japan’s Perspective -- Japan’s Perspective -
Koichi MINAMIDeputy Commissioner
Japan Patent Office
WIPO Global Symposium of Intellectual Property Authorities, 17and 18 September 2009
2
Contents
Growing Demand for Work Sharing Foundation Projects by IP5 Offices JP-FIRST and PPH
3
PCT applications and PCT member states from 1990 to 2007
Total number of worldwide patent applications by year
(source) WIPO Website
The total number of worldwide patent filings has been increasing770,000 patent applications of 1,760,000 (40%) are filed by non-residents
The total number of worldwide patent filings has been increasing770,000 patent applications of 1,760,000 (40%) are filed by non-residents
Non-resident
approx.40%
45
58 6166
8287
94
104
115 117122 124
128
136 138
98
74
108
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007CY( )
thousands( )
Others
GB
FR
DE
US
J P
PCT memberstates
(source) WIPO Website
Growing Demand for Work Sharing
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006(CY)
(million)
Patent applications filed by non- residents
Patent applications filed by residents Non-resident approx. 40%
4
Patent applications at 5 Offices in 2007Patent applications at 5 Offices from 2001 to 2007
Large majority of worldwide patent applications are filed at 5 Offices (1,410,000 in 2007)420,000 patent applications of them are duplicated
Large majority of worldwide patent applications are filed at 5 Offices (1,410,000 in 2007)420,000 patent applications of them are duplicated
440
245
171141
396
0
100
200
300
400
500
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
(CY)
(thousands)
US
J P
CN
KR
EP
78,79422,889
32,870
396,291
26,026
35,603
22,887
12,103
456,154
24,611
64,000
24,420
11,084
140,763
666
3,903
1,146
296
6,347
22,976
4,934
8,467
172,469
18,100
245,161
Growing Demand for Work Sharing
172
456
5
Foundation Project by IP 5 Offices
• IP5 Offices held the first commissioners' meeting in 2007
(JPO, USPTO, EPO, KIPO and SIPO)
• Work Sharing Framework and 10 Foundation Projects
• Maximize utilization existing infrastructure
Support & Enhance Support & Enhance
6
Work-sharing Framework and 10 Foundation Work-sharing Framework and 10 Foundation ProjectsProjects
Common Documentation Database: EPOCommon Documentation Database: EPOCommon Documentation Database: EPOCommon Documentation Database: EPO
Common Application Format: JPOCommon Application Format: JPOCommon Application Format: JPOCommon Application Format: JPO Common Classification: EPOCommon Classification: EPOCommon Classification: EPOCommon Classification: EPO
Common Training Policy [Certification]: Common Training Policy [Certification]: KIPOKIPO
Common Training Policy [Certification]: Common Training Policy [Certification]: KIPOKIPO
Common Approach to Sharing and Common Approach to Sharing and Documenting Search Strategies: USPTODocumenting Search Strategies: USPTO
Common Approach to Sharing and Common Approach to Sharing and Documenting Search Strategies: USPTODocumenting Search Strategies: USPTO
Mutual Machine Translation: KIPOMutual Machine Translation: KIPOMutual Machine Translation: KIPOMutual Machine Translation: KIPO
Common Search and Examination Common Search and Examination Support Tools: USPTOSupport Tools: USPTO
Common Search and Examination Common Search and Examination Support Tools: USPTOSupport Tools: USPTO
Common Rules for Examination Practice Common Rules for Examination Practice and Quality Control: SIPOand Quality Control: SIPO
Common Rules for Examination Practice Common Rules for Examination Practice and Quality Control: SIPOand Quality Control: SIPO
Common Access to Search and Common Access to Search and Examination Results: JPOExamination Results: JPO
Common Access to Search and Common Access to Search and Examination Results: JPOExamination Results: JPO
Common Statistical Parameter System for Common Statistical Parameter System for Examination: SIPOExamination: SIPO
Common Statistical Parameter System for Common Statistical Parameter System for Examination: SIPOExamination: SIPO
10 Foundation Projects - Platform for Work-sharing10 Foundation Projects - Platform for Work-sharing
Foundation Projects by IP5 Offices
7
CAF (Description, Claims, Abstract and Drawings) is available to all these offices
CAF will reduce burden on applicants, cutting out the need of re-drafting applications caused by the difference among the Offices.
CAF (Description, Claims, Abstract and Drawings) is available to all these offices
CAF will reduce burden on applicants, cutting out the need of re-drafting applications caused by the difference among the Offices.
CommonFormat
(Based on PCT)
CommonFormat
(Based on PCT)
JPOFormat
JPOFormat
EPOFormat
EPOFormat
USPTOFormat
USPTOFormat
KIPOFormat
KIPOFormat
…
Foundation Projects by IP5 Offices
PCT adopts CAF since Jan. 2009PCT adopts CAF since Jan. 2009
Common Application Format (CAF)
SIPOFormat
SIPOFormat
PCTFormat
PCTFormat
8
Foundation Projects by IP5 OfficesFoundation Projects by IP5 Offices
JPO
SIPO
EPO
USPTO
KIPO
AIPN*1
36 IP Offices
Dossier Access SystemDossier Access System
Other IP Offices
*1 AIPN: Advanced Industrial Property Network*2 SIPO is under consideration to connect to Dossier Access System in 2016.
Common Access to Search and Examination Results
Search results and examination results in each office can be accessible among these
offices ( Japanese-English Machine Translation)
9
JPO prioritizes examination of applications that satisfy certain conditions:(i) First filed with JPO (and then filed via the Paris route with OSF) and (ii) Examination is requested within two years of JPO filing date JPO provides examination results (FA) to applicants within 30 months of
JPO filing date.
JP-FIRST JP-FIRST ((JPJP--FFast ast IInformation nformation RRelease elease STSTrategy)rategy) Introduced: April 2008Introduced: April 2008
JPO(OFF)
ApplicationApplicationFinal
ExaminationFinal
Examination
OSF FAFA
FA Results
FAFA
JPO prioritizes examination of first filing satisfying JP-FIRST conditions.
CorrespondingApplication
CorrespondingApplication
OSF utilizes FA results of JPO.
30 months
12 months(Paris Priority)
JPO provides FA results to the OSF before the OSF’s examinations.
10
Office of First Filing (OFF)Office of First Filing (OFF)
CorrespondingApplication
Request for PPH
Accelerated Exam.
ApplicationPatentedOffice
Action
Office of Second Filing (OSF)Office of Second Filing (OSF)
OSF utilizes search and examination
result of OFF.
If a patent application has been determined to be patentable in the first filing office, the corresponding application is qualified for accelerated examination in second filing offices with a simple procedure.
PPH (Patent Prosecution Highway)
Average Pendency from PPH Request to FA in the OSF: Average Pendency from PPH Request to FA in the OSF: 2-3 months2-3 months (As of the end of Apr. 2009(As of the end of Apr. 2009 in the JPO and the USPTO)in the JPO and the USPTO)
11
Advantages of PPH ~Quality and Speed ~
• Expeditious examination and Cost savings are expected due to decreasing number of office actions.
• High Grant Rate in the OSF
• High predictability of examination results in the OSF
5.6
10.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
(Months)
Average Pendency from FA to Final Action at the JPO
Applications under JP-US PPH Applications claiming priority to US application
As of Dec. 31, 2008
64%
49%
30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65%
Grant Rate at the JPO
Applications under JP-US PPH All the applications
Another Aspect of PPHSame invention and Same claims between the applications to the OFF and OSF under the PPH Program
Mutual understanding of examination practice in each office (What are same, What are different)
Facilitation of the substantial harmonization of the examination practices between the offices
Improvement of the predictability of the examination result of the OSF for users
Expanding PPH Network! PPH Network!
GPTO
IP Australia
Mar. 2008
DKPTO
UKIPO
KIPO
CIPO
EPOSep. 2008
ROSPATENT
IPOS
NBPR
Feb
. 20
09
APO
Apr. 20
08
Sep. 2007
Jan. 2008
Mar. 2009
Apr. 2007
Nov. 2008
May 2009
Apr. 2009
Jul. 2008
Apr. 2009 Jul. 2009
HPO
Jul. 2006
Jan.
200
8
Jul.
2007
USPTO
: under consideration
: full implementation
: pilot implementation
Jul. 2009
Oct
. 20
09
No
v. 2009
Au
g. 2
009
Jul. 2009
JPO
14
Thank you
http://www.jpo.go.jp/index.htm