ip2: social regulation of emotion and conflict resolution
DESCRIPTION
IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution. Klaus Scherer, Benoit Bediou Swiss Center for Affective Sciences. Motivation. Context ESF-ECRP Grant (IP2): Emotion regulation in conflict and conflict resolution - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution
Klaus Scherer, Benoit Bediou
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences
![Page 2: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation
Context ESF-ECRP Grant (IP2): Emotion regulation in conflict and conflict resolution
AimSubjective perception of (in)justice and its role in conflict and conflict resolution
Study 1Investigate the impact of entitlement on emotions and behavior in social interactions, focusing on negotiation
![Page 3: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Literature review
Study
Perspectives
1
2
3
![Page 4: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Literature review
Study
Perspectives
1
2
3
1. Justice / Fairness
2. Entitlement
3. Negotiation
1. Justice / Fairness
2. Entitlement
3. Negotiation
![Page 5: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Literature review
Study
Perspectives
1
2
31. Background & Aim
2. Paradigm & Design
3. Results & Discussion
1. Background & Aim
2. Paradigm & Design
3. Results & Discussion
![Page 6: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Injustice as expectation violation
« People experience injustice when there is a discrepancy between what they expect based on salient or appropriate normative distribution rule and what they obtain” (Greenberg & Cohen, 1982).
![Page 7: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Values & Norms in distributive justice
Different values & norms (distributive justice)e.g. equality, equity, need (Deutsch 1975)
Inter-individual differencese.g. egalitarian, meritocratic, libertarian (Frohlich et al. 2004; Cappelen et al. 2007)
![Page 8: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Dicator Game with joint production
Frohlich et al 2004
Equity (41%)
Equality (26%)
Selfish (19%)
Productiv
ity?
Productiv
ity?
Effort?Effort?Effort?Effort?
Productiv
ity?
Productiv
ity?
![Page 9: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Values & Norms in distributive justice
Intra-individual variabilitye.g. Rodriguez-Lara & Moreno-Garrido WP2010
Self-serving biases e.g. Messick & Sentis 1979
Bargaining impassese.g. Thompson & Loewenstein 1992
![Page 10: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Summary of previous findings
Context Framing as Buyer/Seller (Hoffman et al. 1994) Initial Ownership (Leliveld et al. 1998)
Entitlement Earning the position (Guth & Thietz 1986; Hoffman et
al. 1994, 1996; Schotter et al 1996; Schurter & Wilson 2007)
Earning the pie (Ruffle, 1998; Cherry, 2001; Cherry et al. 2002; Oxoby & Spraggon 2008)
![Page 11: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Dicator Game with joint production
Frohlich et al 2004
Equity (41%)
Equality (26%)
Selfish (19%)
Productiv
ity?
Productiv
ity?
Effort?Effort?Effort?Effort?
Productiv
ity?
Productiv
ity?
![Page 12: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Paradigm & Design
Production: mental calculation (effort + skills) Distribution: negotiation (Ultimatum Game)
![Page 13: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
20 CHF
Player A Player B
Production screen
4 + 8 + 2 + 9
23
![Page 14: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
20 CHF
Player A Player B
Production screen
4 + 8 + 2 + 9
23
![Page 15: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
20 CHF
A B
Distribution – Proposer screen
A B
PRODUCTION DISTRIBUTIONX CHF 20-X CHF
![Page 16: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
20 CHF
A B
Distribution – Responder screen
A B
PRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION7 CHF 13 CHF
Accept
7/13Reject
0/0
![Page 17: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Paradigm & Design
2 x 4 design Production: better, worse (than other player) Distribution: proposer; equity, equality, unfair
Measures Decisions: P’s offers and R’s decisions R’s judgments of satisfaction (and fairness)
![Page 18: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Experiment design & predictions
DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCTION
N=33
![Page 19: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Room A Room B
![Page 20: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Room A Room B
![Page 21: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Proposer – % Offered%
OFFER
ED
to R
esp
on
der
% PRODUCED by Responder
![Page 22: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Proposer – % Offered%
OFFER
ED
to R
esp
on
der
% PRODUCED by Responder
R=0.35; p<0.01
![Page 23: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Equity? Equality?
Proposer – % OfferedO
FFER
ED
to R
esp
on
der
(%
tota
l)
PRODUCED by Responder (% total)
Equit
y
Equality
Selfish
![Page 24: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Proposer – % Kept
% PRODUCED by Proposer
% K
EP
T b
y P
rop
oser
Equit
y
Equality
Equality? Equity?Selfish
![Page 25: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Equality rule?
<50% >50%
% K
ep
t
% Produced
Equality
*NS
![Page 26: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Equity rule?
*
*Equit
y
% Produced
<50% >50%
% K
ep
t -
% P
rod
uced
![Page 27: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Responder – Accept decision (188 obs)
<50% >50%
Offer: F(2,181)=109.88, p<0.001
% Produced
Fre
qu
en
cy
![Page 28: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Responder – Satisfaction (N=27)
Offer: F(2,16)=67.79, p<0.001Production * Offer: F(2,32)=15.83,
p<0.001
Sati
sfa
cti
on
<50% >50%% Produced
![Page 29: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Responder – Fairness (N=12)Fair
ness
<50% >50%% Produced
![Page 30: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Fairness vs Satisfaction (72 obs)
Fairness
Sati
sfa
cti
on
Fairness
![Page 31: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Conclusion
Individuals perceive and apply fairness norms flexibly depending on the context
Selfish bias due to biased entitlement/expectations? Low production => equality
Own effort > Other productivity High production => equity with generous adjustment
to avoid rejection Own productivity > other effort?
Strategic use of perspective taking to adapt offers to conflicting entitlement/expectations
![Page 32: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Literature review
Study
Perspectives
1
2
31. Background & Aim
2. Feedback & Discussion
1. Background & Aim
2. Feedback & Discussion
![Page 33: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Social Regulation of Emotion?
Injustice and Emotions e.g. Mikula et al. 1998; Weiss & Cropanzano 1996
1. Impact of norms violations on emotions?
![Page 34: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Social Regulation of Emotion?
Injustice and Emotions e.g. Mikula et al. 1998; Weiss & Cropanzano 1996
1. Impact of norms violations on emotions? Injustice as expectation violation
e.g. Bicchieri et al. 2008
2. Prediction error signal in the ACC?
![Page 35: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Social Regulation of Emotion?
Injustice and Emotions e.g. Mikula et al. 1998; Weiss & Cropanzano 1996
1. Impact of norms violations on emotions? Injustice as expectation violation
e.g. Bicchieri et al. 2008
2. Prediction error signal in the ACC? Impact of third-party ADR (e.g. mediation, arbitrage)
e.g. Cason & Mui 1998; Yamamori et al. WP; Shram & Charness, ESA 2010
3. Can we modify expectationemotionbehavior?
![Page 36: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Changing expectations in the UG
Study 1 shows that people’s norms are flexible Study 2 will seek to modify people’s norms 2 phases:
1. Induction
a) Production (quiz)
b) Distribution (3rd-party UG - responder)
2. Measure
c) Production (quiz)
d) Distribution (2nd-party UG - proposer)
![Page 37: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
PRODUCTION
DISTRIBUTION (Responder)
Accept/Reject + fairness
ratings
X3 low prod / X3 high prodNo Arb. (group IV)
2 (intra Low/High prod) * 4 (inter NoArb., Arb.Egalitarian, Arb.Meritocratic, Arb.Control)
PRODUCTION
DISTRIBUTION (proposer)
Offer+ self fairness
ratings
X1 low prod / X1 high prod
X3 low prod/X3 high prodEgalitarian (group I)
Meritocratic (group II)+CONTROL (group III)?
PRODUCTION
DISTRIBUTION (Responder)
Accept/Reject + fairness
ratings
X1 low prod/X1 high prod
PRODUCTION
DISTRIBUTION (Proposer)
Offer+ self fairness
ratings
BASELINE. Offers made by 2nd party (proposer)
BASELINE. Offers made by 2nd party (proposer)
INDUCTION. Offers made by neutral 3rd partyINDUCTION. Offers made by neutral 3rd party
1 MEASURE. Offers made by neutral 3rd partyMEASURE. Offers made by neutral 3rd party
2
1 MEASURE. Offers made by neutral 3rd partyMEASURE. Offers made by neutral 3rd party
2
![Page 38: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Room A Room B
![Page 39: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Room A Room B
![Page 40: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
The arbitration
Control condition: Two of the participants will be randomly chosen and brought to another room to generate the offers[In fact, they will make ratings (emotions + fairness) of pre-determined offers]
Options:
Other task? e.g. fake arbitration
Non social? e.g. a computer will randomly generate a proposal
No arbitration? e.g. use baseline (offers made by 2nd party) as control
Other idea?e.g. 3rd party Dictator, passive viewing?
![Page 41: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The arbitrator
Third party: [One of the participants] is observing the production phase and will make a proposal to both agents about the [A fair?] division of the pie. You can Accept or Reject his offer and you will also rate their fairness of his offers. […] will be paid according to your ratings, so he has an incentive to make fair offers.
Options:
Give him a form of power? (expertise? Legitimacy? Other types of power?) e.g : An highly skilled and experienced arbitrator or mediator
Give him a « norm compliance » function? e.g. [Player XXX] will ensure optimun fairness
Give him a personnal goal? e.g. the arbitrator’s goal is to ensure that both of you are satisfied
Give him a name and/or a face? : e.g. Picture or (fake) webcam recording…
Different (participant) arbitrator in each round? (greater social influence)
![Page 42: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Predictions
Arbitration (attribution) R’s Fairness/Satisfaction should be higher for (unfair) offers made by 3rd parties vs 2nd parties?(e.g. Blount 1995)
Conformity with primed norm Participant should follow the norm of the arbitrator(e.g. Cason & Mui 1998; Yamamori et al. WP; Shram & Charness, ESA 2010) Effects should be greater arbitrator’s whose
proposals are rated high on fairness P’s ratings of self-fairness should be greater if
conformed with abitrator’s norm,
![Page 43: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Predictions
Arbitration (attribution) R’s Fairness/Satisfaction should be higher for (unfair) offers made by 3rd parties vs 2nd parties?(e.g. Blount 1995)
Conformity with primed norm Participant should follow the norm of the arbitrator(e.g. Cason & Mui 1998; Yamamori et al. WP; Shram & Charness, ESA 2010) Effects should be greater arbitrator’s whose
proposals are rated high on fairness P’s ratings of self-fairness should be greater if
conformed with abitrator’s norm,
Social modulation of appraisalSocial modulation of appraisal
![Page 44: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Methodological considerations
1. Type of third party? One of the participants? Power? Legitimacy? Expert or peer? Same or different in each round? Other ideas: passive viewer, dictator?
![Page 45: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Methodological considerations
2. Type of induction task(induction, priming, anchoring, conformity?)
Control arbitration condition?e.g. random norm, social or computer, nonexpert?
No arbitration? (anchoring, reference) Other idea: participants could be passively
observing UG rounds in which one or different P’s would (in)consistently use the same norm while their emotions would be recorded?
![Page 46: IP2: Social Regulation of Emotion and Conflict Resolution](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062517/568135e7550346895d9d5bf9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Methodological considerations
3. Other questions and suggestions Induction phase: Participant always Responder? Test phase: Participant always Proposer? Better (e.g. continuous) DV than R’s A/R decision? Playing for a group? Inclusion/Exclusion? Repeat interaction with same player? 3rd party could emphasize value vs norm? Games on aggression?