IPv6 Deployment PanelOctober 2nd 2012, 1:15pm-2:30pm EDT

Shumon Huque, University of Pennsylvania (moderator)Mark Kosters, American Registry for Internet NumbersJohn Brzozowski, Comcast CorporationEric Kenny, Marist CollegeAllie Hopkins, Tulane University

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

IPv6 Deployment panel

2

Several panelists will provide an update on IPv6 deployment activity and plans at their respective organizations, including both network infrastructure and application services. Other topics might include IPv6 security issues, network monitoring, technical support and training, etc.

Planned Format:Intro10-min presentations from each panelistQ&A/Discussion amongst panel & with audience

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

World IPv6 Launch

• http://www.worldipv6launch.org/

• A few data points from measurements done on June 6th 2012 by participating content providers

3

4

Ran

ke

d b

y T

ota

l V

olu

me

of

IPv6

Tra

ffic

5

Ran

ke

d b

y P

rop

ort

ion

of

eac

h o

rgan

izat

ion

s tr

affi

c th

at i

s IP

v6

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

Application deployment

• http://www.mrp.net/ipv6_survey/

• http://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov/

• http://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov/cgi-bin/generate-edu

6

7

[from NIST]

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

[Other panelists]

8

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

Panelist talks

•Mark Kosters, ARIN

• John Brzozowski, Comcast

• Eric Kenny, Marist College

• Allie Hopkins, Tulane University

• Shumon Huque, University of Pennsylvania

9

10

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

IPv6: TulaneAllie Hopkins

11

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

The Good

• Open Dialog with Community

• Local Mailing Lists and Message Boards

• Campaign/Advertise/Push

• Close Contact with App Developers

• Push Internal Teams

• Pick a Pet Project

12

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

The Bad

• Unforeseen Gotchas

• DNS Based Network Registration

• OS Adoption Differences

• Router Implementation Differences

• Two Steps Forward, One Step Back

• May Need to Revert

• Constant Tweaks Taxes

• Keep Motivation Up

13

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

The Ugly

• Bad Publicity

• Early Adopter Short Term Memory

• Management May Question “Experimentation”

14

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly ... All Necessary

• IPv6 Inevitable

• Help Shape the Future

15

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

IPv6 at Penn

16

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

IPv6 at Penn

•More detailed information than can be provided in this session:

• http://www.upenn.edu/computing/ipv6/

• http://blog.huque.com/2012/05/ipv6-at-penn.html

17

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

IPv6 network infra.

• MAGPI GigaPoP: 2002

• Penn Campus network: initial deployment 2005

• Only core infrastructure & some IT dept subnets

• School of Engineering & Applied Science: 2007

• Summer 2011: All campus wired subnets done

• May 2012: All wireless subnets deployed (~ 200)

• Sep 2012: Wireless deployment backed out due to vendor issues

18

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

IPv6 services

• Penn website (via Akamai)

• Several departmental/school websites

• DNS

• NTP

• Jabber (XMPP)

• SSH

• H.323 Video conferencing services

19

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

www.upenn.edu

• Main Penn website located on Akamai’s global CDN (Content Delivery Network)

• Needed to await Akamai’s production IPv6 service offering

• IPv6 turned up, on May 9th 2012

20

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

Central Email

• No IPv6 deployment yet

• Virus scanning and spam scoring outsourced to Message Labs (now Symantec Cloud)

• So they act as inbound MX, and outbound relay

• Symantec Cloud has no apparent plans to support IPv6

• Considering our options ....

21

22

IPv6 traffic traversing campus border since World IPv6 Launch

23

Under-reported outbound traffic due to a bug in Juniper router network export software

Dramatic decline in traffic after turning off IPv6 on our wireless network due to a bug in Aruba controller software (specifically, breaking Layer-3 IP address mobility).

We are working with Aruba on a solution to this problem.

24

inbound: IPv4 89%, IPv6 11%outbound: IPv4 96%, IPv6 4%

[IPv6 Panel, Fall 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting]

Discussion/Q&A

•Questions/topics?

25

IPv6 Deployment Panel

Shumon Huque, University of PennsylvaniaMark Kosters, American Registry for Internet NumbersJohn Brzozowski, Comcast CorporationEric Kenny, Marist CollegeAllie Hopkins, Tulane University