ipv6 matrix presentation for world ipv6 launch, june 2012
DESCRIPTION
This is the presentation given as a Webinar using Webex, on World IPv6 Launch, 6 June 2012. http://www.ipv6matrix.org/ http://www.worldipv6launch.org/TRANSCRIPT
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 1
IPv6 Matrix Project
Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide
http://www.ipv6matrix.org
Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond – [email protected] June 2012 Update for World IPv6 Launch on 6 June 2012
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 2
We are running out of IP addresses
When we reach this point, it will be too late since
there will be no more “free” IPv4 addresses!
Real time data collected September 2011
http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 3
World IPv6 Launch
� Major Internet service providers (ISPs), home networking
equipment manufacturers, and web companies around the world
are coming together to permanently enable IPv6 for their products and services.
� http://www.worldipv6launch.org
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 4
IPv6 Matrix Project
� ISOC England was awarded a Community Grants Programme award in November 2009
� Design and implementation of an “IPv6 Crawler,” software on a computer that crawls through the DNS at regular intervals in order to detect and test:� IPv6 DNS servers
� IPv6 compliant Web servers� IPv6 compliant SMTP mailers
� IPv6 compliant NTP servers.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 5
Project Rationale
� Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated by a small number of data sources – i.e. the world’s busiest Web Sites
� Without IPv6 accessible content, IPv6 has no chance of being used - ever.
� Take the 1 Million most popular Web site list from alexa.com as a starting point for the domains to be tested. Add more domains later.
� Test them for IPv6 connectivity
� This is equivalent to testing about 6.3 million hosts worldwide
� Use GeoIP database to estimate real host location
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 6
Project Teams
� London, UK:
� Project Management and support
� Hardware supply and installation
� Data Centre and IPv6 connectivity
� Nile University, Egypt:
� Software Programming
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 7
Crawler
CENTOS 5 Linux / updatedOperating
System
2 x hot-swappable redundant
535W.
PSU
146 Gb hardware SATA 2-disk
RAID (hot swappable)
HD Storage
4 Gb DDR2 SDRAMRAM
2 x Dual Core Intel(R)
Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz
CPU
194.33.63.250 / 1 Gb/s (GIH
private address space)
IPv4 address
(eth1) /
speed
shell.ipv6matrix.orgName (eth1)
2a00:19e8:20:1::a2 / 100 Mb/sIPv6 address
(eth0) /
speed
212.124.204.162 / 100 Mb/sIPv4 address
(eth0) /
speed
turtle.ipv6matrix.org ;
crawler.ipv6matrix.org
turtle.ipv6matrix.com ;
crawler.ipv6matrix.com
turtle.ipv6matrix.net ;
crawler.ipv6matrix.net
Name (eth0)
HP DL360pModel
Crawler (back
end)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 8
Web Server
Ubuntu 4.4 Linux / updatedOperating System
Single 500WPSU
2 x 1 Tb fast SATAHD Storage
4 Gb DDR2 SDRAMRAM
2 x Dual Core Intel(R) Xeon(TM)
CPU 3.40GHz
CPU
194.33.63.251 / 1 Gb/s (GIH
private address space)
IPv4 address
(eth1) /
speed
tusk.ipv6matrix.orgName (eth1)
2a00:19e8:20:1::aa / 100 Mb/sIPv6 address
(eth0) /
speed
212.124.204.170 / 100 Mb/sIPv4 address
(eth0) /
speed
elephant.ipv6matrix.org ;
www.ipv6matrix.org
elephant.ipv6matrix.com ;
www.ipv6matrix.com
elephant.ipv6matrix.net ;
www.ipv6matrix.net
Name (eth0)
HP DL140Model
Web Server
(front end)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 9
Router
MN-16ESW 16 port / 100
Mb/s
Interface card /
speed
2 / 100 Mb/sEthernet Ports /
speed
64 MbDRAM
Advanced IP Services IOSOperating
System
CISCO 2811Model
Router
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 10
Local Network
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 11
Software flowchart
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 12
Web Site
Structure
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 13
www.ipv6matrix.org Web Site
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 14
What are we tracking?
� Host IPv6 penetration
� Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates
� Includes generic TLD (gTLDs, .com, .net, .org) and country code ccTLDs
� Two types of information:
� Infrastructure: DNS + Web + E-mail + Time server (NTP)This tracks all of the infrastructure required to run IPv6 Web services
� Web sites only (actual content)This tracks the Web services themselves. Usually this percentage is lower than the figure for the infrastructure
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 15
What are we archiving?
� Everything that we are tracking on the previous page, plus:
� Testing of connectivity to the above services in case IPv6 addresses are advertised but no service runs on them
� Tracing of route from London Docklands to each one of these hosts both using IPv4 and IPv6 – and archiving all of this information in text format
� A lot more data, accessible from the Web site archive
� In June 2012, the size of this database in text format is approx 140Gb and continually increasing (the testing software runs 24/7)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 16
Data Archives
Selecting Data Archives provides
a link to the detailed information
Table.
Click on “Search”, to go
directly to the Top Level Domain,
or scroll down to the desired
Top Level Domain.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 17
Data Archives
� Example Data in Data Archives (stop
at date)
Click on the “+” to the left of the
Top Level Domain to gain
access the sub-menu containing
the dates of all the data runs,
and so on, to reveal results.
year-month-day__hour-min-sec
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 18
Data Archives - results
Click on the links to open a
new window containing
all of the detailed results
formatted in a table.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 19
Data Archives - resultsBasic IPv4/IPv6 connectivity table
Domain penetration summary table
Geographical IP database
Type of IPv6 access (tunnels etc.)
Trace path, hop count, MTU IPv4 & IPv6
Ping count IPv4 and IPv6
Reverse IPv4 and IPv6
SOA for Nameserver
Service detection for SMTP, HTTP and HTTPs
TLS detection for SMTP
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 20
Detailed Data for .AEClicked on tcp80_WWW_ae: connection to http port
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 21
Using the filter
Use the filter to select by Top Level Domain, or by type of service tested.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 22
Results
4 June 2012 – pre-IPv6 Launch
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 23
Europe Data snapshot
December 20119.82%
15.14%
2.71%
2.80% 4.06%
2.02%
9.34%6.44%
2.13%
2.77%
5.39%
13.70%
4.75%
7.91%
5.68%
0.64% 0.58%
11.83%
0.83%
4.04%
6.72%
16.66%6.14%
6.30% 2.67% 10.01%
11.09%
5.58%
2.66% 4.96% 7.07%11.87%
8.24%
13.52%
5.06% 6.96%
3.70%
5.20%
7.44%
15.81%
9.98%
12.20%
6.92%8.87%
16.73%
6.50%
4.04%
0.65% 0.93%
10.53%
0.16%
3.88%
4.34%
18.54%18.36%
3.51%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS
- Web
- NTP
16.26%
2.33%
12.19%
2.71%
4 June 2012
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 24
Europe Data snapshot
4 June 2012
11.67%
1.00%
0.27%
0.71% 2.41%
0.47%
1.68%7.45%
1.17%
0.45%
0.94%
2.19%
0.99%
0.51%
2.60%
0.32% 0.29%
0.42%
0.95%
0.19%
0.86%
4.15%9.14%
0.85% 1.30% 4.00%
0.48%
2.85%
0.75% 2.82% 6.71%1.83%
0.51%
1.68%
1.11% 1.22%
0.35%
1.08%
0.93%
1.08%
11.85%
4.35%
10.35%0.73%
3.90%
1.07%
1.80%
0.34% 0.35%
0.36%
0.17%
0.16%
1.59%
26.70%23.86%
1.41%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
12.29%
0.65%
12.43%
0.64%
December 2011
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 25
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Previous Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
Order Dec 2011 4 June 2012
1 Moldova (*) 18.54% 18.36% -0.18%
2 Switzerland 16.66% 16.73% 0.07%
4 France 15.14% 15.81% 0.67%
7 Slovenia 11.33% 13.69% 2.36%
5 Finland 13.70% 13.52% -0.18%
9 Czech Republic 10.01% 12.20% 2.19%
3 Slovakia 16.26% 12.19% -4.07%
11 Netherlands 9.34% 11.87% 2.53%
6 Ukraine 11.83% 10.53% -1.30%
10 Portugal 9.82% 9.98% 0.16%
8 Poland 11.09% 8.87% -2.22%
12 Denmark 7.91% 8.24% 0.33%
14 Latvia 6.72% 7.44% 0.72%
15 Germany 6.44% 7.07% 0.63%
32 Russia 2.13% 6.96% 4.83%
17 Spain 6.14% 6.92% 0.78%
18 Estonia 6.14% 6.92% 0.78%
13 Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 7.51% 6.54% -0.97%
16 Austria 6.30% 6.50% 0.20%
19 Croatia 5.83% 6.28% 0.45%
20 Norway 5.68% 5.58% -0.10%
21 Sweden 4.75% 5.06% 0.31%
23 Belgium 4.06% 4.96% 0.90%
26 Luxembourg 3.21% 4.80% 1.59%
22 Greece 4.34% 4.04% -0.30%
24 Lithuania 4.04% 3.88% -0.16%
29 United Kingdom 2.71% 3.70% 0.99%
30 Italy 2.67% 3.51% 0.84%
25 Macedonia 3.33% 3.33% 0.00%
33 Iceland 2.02% 2.77% 0.75%
31 Hungary 2.33% 2.71% 0.38%
28 Ireland 2.80% 2.66% -0.14%
27 Serbia (*) 3.06% 2.53% -0.53%
35 Romania 0.58% 0.93% 0.35%
36 Bulgaria 0.50% 0.81% 0.31%
34 Belarus 0.83% 0.16% -0.67%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 26
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Previous Country WEB % change
Order Dec 2011 4 june 2012
1 Moldova (*) 23.70% 23.86% 0.16%
2 Slovakia 12.29% 12.43% 0.14%
3 Portugal 11.67% 11.85% 0.18%
5 Spain 9.14% 10.35% 1.21%
6 Germany 7.45% 6.71% -0.74%
9 Slovenia 4.77% 5.53% 0.76%
10 Czech Republic 4.00% 4.35% 0.35%
8 Switzerland 4.15% 3.90% -0.25%
7 Macedonia 4.23% 3.12% -1.11%
11 Norway 2.60% 2.85% 0.25%
14 Belgium 2.41% 2.82% 0.41%
16 Netherlands 1.68% 1.83% 0.15%
15 Greece 1.59% 1.80% 0.21%
13 Finland 2.19% 1.68% -0.51%
17 Croatia 1.63% 1.45% -0.18%
18 Italy 1.30% 1.41% 0.11%
20 Russia 1.17% 1.22% 0.05%
19 Sweden 0.99% 1.11% 0.12%
4 Estonia 0.94% 1.08% 0.14%
22 France 1.00% 1.08% 0.08%
23 Austria 0.85% 1.07% 0.22%
21 Latvia 0.86% 0.93% 0.07%
24 Ireland 0.71% 0.75% 0.04%
28 Poland 0.48% 0.73% 0.25%
25 Hungary 0.65% 0.64% -0.01%
35 Serbia (*) 0.00% 0.59% 0.59%
31 Denmark 0.51% 0.51% 0.00%
26 Iceland 0.47% 0.45% -0.02%
29 Bulgaria 0.16% 0.45% 0.29%
27 Ukraine 0.42% 0.36% -0.06%
30 United Kingdom 0.27% 0.35% 0.08%
32 Romania 0.29% 0.35% 0.06%
12 Belarus 0.95% 0.17% -0.78%
33 Lithuania 0.19% 0.16% -0.03%
34 Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 27
Europe Trends
� Many countries see a significant rise in infrastructure
� Likely to be caused by a main hosting provider, installing dual-stack Name-servers
� Russia with biggest growth in infrastructure
� Slovakia & Portugal still leading with dual-stack Web sites
� Spain catching up.
� Country with largest number of dual stack Web sites in Europe: Germany
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 28
Asia Data snapshot
2.13%
0.20%
3.47%4.16%
2.76%
0.50%
0.54%
0.64%
12.90%
11.94%
3.12%6.16%
0.00%
1.83%
0.25%
3.52%
4.22% 0.10%
1.84%
1.22%
2.21%
2.38%
7.74%
2.51%
0.90%
6.96%
0.22%
2.66%
0.22%
2.02%
3.81%
0.47% 3.84%4.32%
3.70%
0.00%
0.63%
3.12%
0.47%
0.27%
1.89%12.79%
4.57%
22.42%
22.73%26.32%
4 June 2012
December 2011
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
SG: 25.52%SG: 24.52%
HK: 2.61%HK: 2.49%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 29
Asia Data snapshot
1.17%
0.15%
0.91%0.97%
1.77%
0.38%
0.14%
0.65%
3.49%
11.21%
3.12%1.14%
0.00%
0.28%
0.13%
4.69%
1.24% 0.11%
3.57%
1.22%
0.38%
1.49%
1.40%
0.69%
0.40%
1.22%
0.18%
1.59%
0.08%
0.29%
4.56%
0.07% 0.98%0.89%
3.06%
0.00%
0.64%
3.12%
0.40%
0.27%
3.45%11.85%
1.55%
5.95%
50.00%50.00%
4 June 2012
December 2011
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
Low Sample
Low accuracy
SG: 0.65%SG: 0.90%
HK: 0.71%HK: 0.77%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 30
Previous Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
Order Dec 2011 4 June 2012
1 Singapore 25.52% 24.52% -1.00%
2 Armenia (*) 12.90% 22.42% 9.52%
3 Sri Lanka (*) 11.94% 12.79% 0.85%
4 Indonesia 6.16% 7.74% 1.58%
12 Russia 2.13% 6.96% 4.83%
8 Malaysia 4.22% 4.57% 0.35%
6 New Zealand 4.16% 4.32% 0.16%
5 Australia 3.47% 3.84% 0.37%
7 Philippines (*) 3.52% 3.81% 0.29%
10 Saudi Arabia (*) 2.76% 3.70% 0.94%
9 Oman (*) 3.12% 3.12% 0.00%
11 Taiwan 2.38% 2.66% 0.28%
14 Thailand 2.21% 2.51% 0.30%
24 Hong Kong 2.61% 2.49% -0.12%
15 Japan 1.83% 2.02% 0.19%
13 Qatar (*) 1.84% 1.89% 0.05%
20 India 0.54% 0.90% 0.36%
17 United Arab Emirates (*) 0.64% 0.63% -0.01%
18 Iran 0.50% 0.47% -0.03%
22 Vietnam (*) 0.10% 0.47% 0.37%
16 Pakistan 1.22% 0.27% -0.95%
19 South Korea 0.25% 0.22% -0.03%
21 China 0.20% 0.22% 0.02%
23 Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 31
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Previous Country WEB % change
Order Dec 2011 4 June 2012
1 Sri Lanka (*) 11.21% 11.85% 0.64%
3 Armenia (*) 3.49% 5.95% 2.46%
2 Philippines (*) 4.69% 4.56% -0.13%
4 Qatar (*) 3.57% 3.45% -0.12%
5 Oman (*) 3.12% 3.12% 0.00%
6 Saudi Arabia (*) 1.77% 3.06% 1.29%
7 Taiwan 1.49% 1.59% 0.10%
13 Malaysia 1.24% 1.55% 0.31%
9 Indonesia 1.14% 1.40% 0.26%
12 Russia 1.17% 1.22% 0.05%
10 Australia 0.91% 0.98% 0.07%
22 Singapore 0.65% 0.90% 0.25%
11 New Zealand 0.97% 0.89% -0.08%
24 Hong Kong 0.71% 0.77% 0.06%
15 Thailand 0.38% 0.69% 0.31%
14 United Arab Emirates (*) 0.65% 0.64% -0.01%
16 Iran 0.38% 0.40% 0.02%
20 India 0.14% 0.40% 0.26%
18 Japan 0.28% 0.29% 0.01%
8 Pakistan 1.22% 0.27% -0.95%
19 China 0.15% 0.18% 0.03%
17 South Korea 0.13% 0.08% -0.05%
21 Vietnam (*) 0.11% 0.07% -0.04%
23 Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 32
Asia Trends
� Singapore still leading by far in infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack Web Site content
� Russia with biggest growth in infrastructure
� China results abnormally very low – content not dual stacked or IPv6 behind firewall?
� India also low both in infrastructure and most popular Web sites with dual stack
� Less reliability of results due to smaller sample size in many countries of the region
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 33
Africa Data snapshot
36.61%
9.52%
7.42%
10.20%
0.96%1.01%
9.43%
7.17%
43.01%
9.38%
4 June 2012
December 2011
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 34
Africa Data snapshot
0.00%
10.00%
2.78%
14.29%
0.41%0.46%
14.29%
2.56%
0.00%
0.00%
4 June 2012
December 2011
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 35
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
The small number of hosts tested make the results
for most of Africa appear higher than they really are
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
Dec 2011 4 June 2012
Tunisia (*) 36.61% 43.01% 6.40%
Tanzania (*) 10.20% 9.43% -0.77%
Senegal (*) 9.52% 9.38% -0.14%
Kenya (*) 7.42% 7.17% -0.25%
South Africa 0.96% 1.01% 0.05%
Algeria 0.00% 0.96% 0.96%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 36
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
The small number of hosts tested make the results
for most of Africa appear higher than they really are
Country WEB % change
Dec 2011 4 June 2012
Tanzania (*) 14.29% 14.29% 0.00%
Kenya (*) 2.78% 2.56% -0.22%
Algeria 0.00% 1.28% 1.28%
South Africa 0.41% 0.46% 0.05%
Senegal (*) 10.00% 0.00% -10.00%
Tunisia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 37
Africa Trends
� Many countries now have IPv6
capability, some through tunnels
� Dual Stack Islands starting to appear
� Can be compared with the growth of
Internet connectivity in the nineties
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 38
Compare Historical data on
African Internet Connectivity
June 1994 May 1997
Source: Internetology - http://www.nsrc.org/codes/bymap/ntlgy/ntlgy.htm
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 39
North/South America
0.80%
5.89%1.14%
2.42%
5.81%
4 June 2012
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
1.09%
4.35%
5.41%
0.49%
4.44%
PR: 6.67%
0.30%
3.57%
December 2011
3.30%
6.17%3.57%
PR: 7.14%
4.05%
0.00%
0.93%
3.70%
0.72%
2.32%
5.36%
0.49%
0.53%
0.57%0.56%
3.42%2.63%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 40
North/South America
0.86%
2.66%0.58%
0.61%
0.20%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
1.45%
1.85%
2.68%
0.35%
6.38%
PR: 6.67%
Web only
0.54%
0.19%
PR: 7.14%
1.83%
1.36%
1.03%
0.29%
8.75%
0.24%2.73%2.44%
2.71%
0.31%0.95%
December 2011
4 June 2012
0.56%0.56%
0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 41
For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results
in many countries appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Previous Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
Order Dec 2011 4 June 2012
2 Puerto Rico (*) 7.24% 6.67% -0.57%
4 United States 5.81% 6.17% 0.36%
9 Brasil 2.32% 5.89% 3.57%
3 Uruguay (*) 5.41% 5.36% -0.05%
7 Ecuador (*) 3.70% 4.44% 0.74%
5 Venezuela (*) 4.05% 4.35% 0.30%
6 Cuba (*) 3.57% 3.57% 0.00%
15 Peru (*) 2.63% 3.42% 0.79%
8 Canada 2.42% 3.30% 0.88%
10 Panama (*) 0.93% 1.14% 0.21%
16 Costa Rica 0.00% 1.09% 1.09%
11 Mexico 0.53% 0.80% 0.27%
14 Colombia (*) 0.30% 0.72% 0.42%
12 Chile 0.57% 0.56% -0.01%
13 Argentina 0.49% 0.49% 0.00%
1 Guatemala (*) 100.00% 0.00% -100.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 42
For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results
in many countries appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
Previous Country WEB % change
Order Dec 2011 4 June 2012
3 Ecuador (*) 6.38% 8.75% 2.37%
1 Puerto Rico (*) 7.14% 6.67% -0.47%
2 Uruguay (*) 2.68% 2.73% 0.05%
15 Peru (*) 2.44% 2.71% 0.27%
5 Brasil 1.36% 2.66% 1.30%
4 Venezuela (*) 1.85% 1.83% -0.02%
16 Costa Rica 0.00% 1.45% 1.45%
6 Mexico 0.86% 1.03% 0.17%
9 Colombia (*) 0.31% 0.95% 0.64%
8 Canada 0.54% 0.61% 0.07%
12 Panama (*) 0.29% 0.58% 0.29%
7 Chile 0.56% 0.56% 0.00%
10 Argentina 0.24% 0.35% 0.11%
11 United States 0.19% 0.20% 0.01%
13 Guatemala (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
14 Cuba (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 43
America Trends
� USA leads in infrastructure but low on dual Stack Web site (although the figure is 1699 hosts).
� Brazil leading in Latin America with 204 Dual Stack Web Site hosts
� Elsewhere, data based on low number of Web sites, needs to be taken in moderation (the restricted number of hosting providers can make figures jump several percentage points)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 44
Worldwide Trends
� We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6 implementation
� A decrease in percentage in some countries, points to unstable peering agreements (the IPv6 network is less closely meshed than the IPv4 network)
� Germany leads the world in the number of Dual Stack Web sites among world’s most popular Web sites: 14636 hosts out of a sample size of 218 178 hosts tested
� Bearing in mind the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry has run out of IPv4 addresses, it is alarming to see so few Web sites up and running IPv6 in that region, especially in countries where Internet growth is high, such as in India.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 45
Problems / Possible Errors
� Lots of errors in the DNS – commas, no A, no AAAA record, looping MX, etc.
� Firewalls and security software:
� Blocking of network segments
� detecting denial of service attack (DoS) by error:
• Unusual UDP traffic. Trace-path / ping, SMTP, HTTP, Secure HTTP, NTP port testing.
� Internet snapshot from one location only
� Less accurate results with small input data size (small number of domains tested)
� Disputed accuracy of Geographical IP database
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 46
Example: fake IPv6 AAAA record
� Country specific results? /P2
� (examples from the report / finding
errors etc.)
Perform a search for ipv6 field starting with ::ffff
These “ipv6” addresses are AAAA records
which pretend to denote an IPv6 address,
but are actually IPv4 addresses.
There are plenty of examples of such mis-
configuration in the DNS.
Worse problems are caused by commas in domain
names, ie. www.domain,com as well as IP
addresses returning localhost 127.0.0.1 or ::1 etc.
Comma!
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 47
Machine readable output
Command directly to SQL database
http://www.ipv6matrix.org:4444/getTable?crawl=2010-07-18_12-24-48&tld=com&table=WWW_com
It is therefore possible to use an entirely new user interface with the back end database
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 48
Future work / funding required
� Add more domains to be tested
� Add more features to be tested
� Current front end Web Pages are only an example of possible analysis
� Develop new data visualisation
� Perform further analysis
� Perform historical/time analysis from archives
� Develop an engine to write automated reports
� Duplicate Crawler to other regions
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 49
Thank you
CTMInternational
Contact: ISOC England – [email protected]