ipv6 world wide policy review

http://www.ripe.net

RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Filiz Yilmaz RIPE60, May 2010, Praha 1

IPv6 WorldWide Policy Review

http://www.ripe.net


RIPE 60, May 2010, PrahaFiliz Yilmaz

IPv6 talking regions

• ARIN, APNIC, RIPE, LACNIC

2

http://www.ripe.net



ARIN

• Criteria for PI- have IPv4 PI or,- Be IPv6 multihomed or intend to be or- Plan of the deployment in 1, 2 5 yrs and reason for PI

• Receive upto /48 for each site- Site = Location, not organisation- What is a site really?

• More discussion to come

3

http://www.ripe.net



ARIN

• Criteria for allocations- Have IPv4 allocation or- Be IPv6 multihomed or intend to be or- Plan to make 50 assignments to others in 5 yrs

• “50” a good number?

• In Last Call

4

http://www.ripe.net



ARIN

• Simplified IPv6 Policy

• Different allocation/assignment sizes- X-Small /48, Small /40, Medium /32, Large /28 - X-Large /24, XX-Large > /24

• “Classful” addressing

• Abandoned

5

http://www.ripe.net



LACNIC

• Assignments for Critical Infrastructure- Prove IXP/NAP capacity, have at least 3 members- Justify need- Min /48, max /32

• End Users with “critical” infrastructure- Not to be routed globally- Min /48, max /40

• Under discussion

6

http://www.ripe.net



LACNIC + APNIC

• Removing Routing Requirement

• LACNIC discussing

• APNIC reached consensus

7

http://www.ripe.net



Conclusion

• Operational matters coming to surface- “Site” definition- Routing practices

• Simplified criteria- Increased incentives for deployment

8


http://www.ripe.netNameName event/date 3

Questions?

ipv6 world wide policy review

Technology