ir500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 everybody right everybody's proposal right 85 15...

127
o /*"% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY ' ' REGION III 641 Chfitnut Building Pttlliddphli, Ptnniylvinli 19107 JUL2',"l988 Joel Schneider, Esq. Manta & Welge One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street 37th Floor Philadelphia, PA 1910? u'ohr, fason, Esq. Dechert, Price & Rhoads 3400 Centre Square West 1500 Kaikcit Street PA 3.910? O'er Frooka, ERC>. r-s Rl chare's s 085 Thlici Avf. 1'ev, York, OT 30C2J-46C? FE: IJ.S. v. Mcclet, Inc. et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 8S-3060 Dear Counseli Bnc']OF.6c] for your JpfoiiiaUdii IP 6 Cfoi.y of t.h? lia c.f the Jui« 16, 1986 rvtllc r.pfljiit vil.l' JC'i-prri t(. Ik- F;(-<jj'ri'eO f!C:l VlJtJnic" Clfc^tH-MpPl.H, Dc-. n' Cl rcr-t, FPC;, /IR500003 I<_<e page. iUmd in thU ^ame U not a4 *earfaWt J>«, {<g4b£c,<u ' /abei, *t ** due to 4«6^ta«da*d GO<O* o* co»d^t*on oi thi oUgitial page.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o

/*"% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY' ' REGION III

641 Chfitnut BuildingPttlliddphli, Ptnniylvinli 19107

JUL2',"l988

Joel Schneider, Esq.Manta & WelgeOne Commerce Square2005 Market Street37th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 1910?

u'ohr, fason, Esq.Dechert, Price & Rhoads3400 Centre Square West1500 Kaikcit Street

PA 3.910?

O'er Frooka, ERC>.r-s Rl chare's s

085 Thlici Avf.1'ev, York, OT 30C2J-46C?

FE: IJ.S. v. Mcclet, Inc. et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 8S-3060

Dear Counseli

Bnc']OF.6c] for your JpfoiiiaUdii IP 6 Cfoi.y of t.h? lia

c.f the Jui« 16, 1986 rvtllc r.pfljiit vil.l' JC'i-prri t(. Ik-

F;(-<jj'ri'eO

f!C:l V l J t J n i c " Clfc^tH-MpPl.H,Dc-. n' Cl rcr-t, FPC;,

/IR500003

I < _ < e page. iUmd in thU ^ame U not a4 *earfaWt J>«, {<g4b£c,<u '/abei, *t ** due to 4«6^ta«da*d GO<O* o* co»d^t*on oi thi oUgitial page.

Page 2: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

oTRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS - U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING ON PROPOSED REMEDYFOR THE AMBLER ASBESTOS SITE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA

JUNE 16, 1988

PAGE LINE DID READ SHOULD READ

2 14 Add: U.S. EPA - Region III,841 Chestnut Street,Philadelphia, PA

3 12 for the site for the AmblerAsbestos site

3 17 that we've done about3 21 DELETE: what we did

7 22, 24 Kaufman Coughlin8 12, 20 pile piles

8 19 is are9 11, 13 pile piles

9 12 it is now they are now

9 2 originally there originallyconstructed there

10 1 The other alternative to The other remedialremoving it was alternative

11 23 We construct We will construct

11 3, 12 pile piles

11 3-4 DELETE: what we've optedpotentially to construct

11 18-19 DELETE: apparently you15 18 guys from Mr. Abrey aays news from Abrue is16 1-2 than — I live near the than where I live

peat moss near the Piedmont

H the. page, iitmtd in thi* <*ame it not a* *eada6te.,.o*. legible a« «.«*«*..label, *t i4 due to 4ub4tanda4d colo« o/t cond<cUon o{ the o<*g<«al page.

Page 3: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

oPAGE LINE DID READ SHOULD READ

16 13 damn dam16 16 ADD AT END OF LINE:

depositing17 8 currently as currently under

litigation as of17 13 DELETE: maintaining the

property

17 19-20 DELETE

19 12 that is monitoring that is a monitoringwell

20 4 we had RI/FS was paid we had the RI/FS paidfor

21 8 And sites At sitess-\•-J 21 14 tough waste toxic waste

22 21 40 years 20 years

26 24 vitrific Vitrifix27 1 it ten tons process ten tons

27 19 EPA current standing EPA's currentunderstanding is that

29 14-15 SUBSTITUTE: with anotherkind of hazardous wastemight allow contaminationof groundwater but if it'sasbestos, capping is thebest solution.

36 15 vitrific Vitrifix

36 16 what is between was between

44 22 forever. Borrowin forever, barring

O

JR500005

U tht page l«ed in thi* {Aane it not at *eaae,^i»,iefl^bl*,,a4..<*label, it it due to tubttandand colo* 01 condition o& the. original page.

Page 4: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

oPAGE LINE DID READ SHOULD READ

46 15 our reasibllity our Remedial46 17 1982 1980

47 3 occurres • occurs47 3 in that in time which47 6 was asbestos was mainly asbestos

47 7 not asbestos from the not all asbestos frompile the piles.

48 18 It sits there and we The best alternativejust can't, the vast

49 22 Superfund needs Superfund lead sites

50 17 JOHN BEAM JEAN THOMPSON

54 22 DELETE: all after word ^"law."

57 18 1.60 tons 1.26 million tons

58 17 that no Superfund site that at no Superfundcan just pick site can we just

pick up

58 21 ban is in effect up ban goes into effectuntil November as of November

62 21 actual account actual count

63 4-5 Reinvestigation of those Reinvestigation ofsamples has caused some of those air samples hasthe techniques used at the called some of thetime into question techniques used

at the time intoquestion.

AR500006

H tht page litmtd in thit <«a«e it not a4 *eadabli,j>*r legible, a4-t*.£»i$label, it it due to tubttandaid colon, o* condition oi tht original page.

Page 5: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0PAGE LINE DID READ SHOULD READ

66 12 glass and glass furnace and

66 13-14 lent them the facility lent to them forfor a week a week

70 8,10,25 Matel Industries Batell Industries70 17-18 half hour and a half hour are more

conversation informational thana conversation

70 19 it was just a half just a half hourhour

71 24 110. 110 moisture content.

0

72 14-15 DELETE: If it burns, wouldthe vacuums have the capacityto suck it in time.

75 5 up until November after November78 11,18 yellow-like jello-like

79 6 riffraff rip-rap

79 11 we feel we feel is necessary

81 8 sending them sending them noticeletters

83 8 we will send you will send

83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposalright

85 15 alternatives which alternatives forhazardous waste siteswhich

86 6 is all was the bestalternative of all

•J

AR500007

H tht page twined in thit <*aine it not at , , . . . ,label, it it due to tubtttndand colon on condition o< tht original page.

Page 6: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

PAGE LINE DID READ SHOULD READ

92 11 17th 27th

93 12 ad Inquirer101 14 remedial action remedial investigation

110 18 Sails Isales112 2 Sails Isales

112 8 Null Newall114 1 didn't think it was didn't think would

occuring happen, was occuring117 1 comes from comes from is difficult

118 18 can't right now. can't answerthat right now .C\

'NANCI SINCLAIR JTECTOR ABSEU-aiNTRONU.S. Environmental Protection U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency Agency

BRUCE MULHOLDTTTiuDU.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency

li tht page Imed in thit diamt it not at *tadabt.i..ot Itgibtt,a4..thi* ' • •label, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition o{ the oniginat page.

Page 7: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

TRANSCRIPTOF PROCEEDINGS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

PUBLIC MEETING

PROPOSED REMEDY FOR THE

AMBLER ASBESTOS SITE

BOROUGH OF AMBLER

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

;, Ambler, Pemwylvuiia

^ if '- fe8',•»••••••INC.

(202)347-3700NUkmwidtCMmgi800-3364646

n tht page filmed in thit </tane it not at -HWV* -.. **»*•,«, •«.tn<4 *llabel, 4.t 4.t due to tubttandand colon on condition o< the ot^g^nal page.

Page 8: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

i

im

I

i

i|i8

I

DP ,sm

2ipiao3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

te20

21

22

23

24

29

cUNITED STATES OF AMERICA i

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

PUBLIC MEETING

PROPOSED REMEDY FOR THE

AMBLER ASBESTOS SITE

BOROUGH OF AMBLER

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

AMBLER BOROUGH HALL

31 EAST BUTLER AVENU™

AMBLER, PENNSYLVANIA

THURSDAY,

JUNE 16, 1988

7:00 p.m.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 800-336-6646

O

fiRSOOGIO

i tftpage Iwed in thit 6«ane it not at ..-label, it it due to Aubttandand colon on condition 06 «he oniginat page.

Page 9: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0PANEL PARTICIPANTS

•">,

O

2

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

NANCI SINCLAIR, Community Relations Coordinator

U.S. EPA - Region III

841 Chestnut Street

Philadelphia, PA 1.9107

HECTOR ABREU-CINTRON, Remedial Project Manager

U.S. EPA - Region III

841 Chestnut Street

Philadelphia, PA 19107

BRUCE MOLHOLT, Toxicologist

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.

202-347-3700 800-336-6646

AR5QQG. - - • . . - .

I< the page Imed /« th^ inaatt it not at. . . , , .label, it £A due to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht oniginat pagt*.

Page 10: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

3 P R O C E E D I N G S' ' i

. , .The Public Meeting to present a Summary of

the RI/FS and the Proposed Remedy for the Ambler Asbestos

Site convened, pursuant to notice, at 7:00 p.m., Nanci

Sinclair, presiding . . ,

MS. SINCLAIR: We might as well get started now.

My name is Nanci Sinclair, I work with EPA, Environmental

Protection Agency in the Philadelphia office, Region III.

We cover an area including Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia,

Maryland, West Virginia and Washington, D.C, Also here this

evening from EPA is Hector Abreu. He is the project manager,

enforcement Remedial Project Manager for the site, and also

Bruce Molholt is here. He is our EPA toxicologist and he £S

will be able to address all of your health questions or

health concerns regarding the site, and asbestos in general.

Hector will be able to cover all the more detailed questions

that we've done, the work that we have done over the last

year and a half or two years.

Let me give you a little background, Last time we

met with you was back in May, I think, or June of '86, and

what we did, we told you at that tine that we were going to

begin what is known as a remedial investigation and remedial

investigation includes a lot of sampling, At this particu-

lar site we checked for erosion along the site boundary,

along the Wissahickon Creek, Also we sampled asbestos piles

U tht page lued in thit i/iamt it not at *eadable,.P*. .legible, «label, -ct it due to tubAtandand colon on condition o< the oniginat page.

Page 11: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

n2

3

4

5

6

I 1

8

9

10

It

12

13

0ts16

| »

! ">

j 19

i 20i 21i 22

j 23

24

'J

4

on the site. We did some other soil sampling, some ground- :

water sampling, surface water sampling, Also we did ambient

air sampling, Went into the community and we took air read-

ings to see what kind of releases if any were coming from

the site, and also took air samples right on-site.

So we did a lot of work over the last year and a half.

All of that in detail is put together in a number of volumes

and they are available at the site repository which is the

Wissahickon Valley Library, the Ambler Branch of the library.

There's also some copies of the proposed plan. That is also

available there.

The proposed plan is a little less technical and a

little less detailed, but it's actually a summary of all of

the work that we did out there and our findings and what we

came upon as the best choices to remediate the site or clean

up the site.

After we finished our remedial investigation, we did

compile this Use of cleanup alternatives that is available

in this proposed plan and we came upon the one that we

thought was best to clean up the site,

Under the new Superfund Bill which was re-authorized

back in October of '86, we can't pick up a Superfund site,

excavate it totally and bring it co another site and con-

taminate another site with this waste,

After November of this year in fact there is a land

#65000/3.

U tht page fluted <« th^ <*a«e -It not at *eadabte...o*. £ eg^We,«4 tkH'&label, -dt it due to 4ub.4tanda*d colo* on condition o{ the oUg^nal page.

.l..*,..-. .,J

Page 12: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I2

3

4

6

ban that will be In effect that says we can no longer deposit '

hazardous waste at a landfill and we always use Reserve Con-

servation Recovery Act. That's our regulatory arm of our iI

hazardous waste division, We always use something that's

regulated by them for any kind of disposal purposes,

However, in this particular case, we felt chat the

best way to contain that asbestos and keep it from becoming

airborne is through containment, So we are going to do added

measures that was done back in '84 as a removal action at

the site when we just discovered the pile and covered it with

the soil cover and then the vegetation cover and in this

case we are going to also cover it with a geotextile kind

of cloth-like fabric over the top of the pile, three more

feet of soil and then vegetate it so it can't become air-

borne and there won't be an erosion problem because we are

going to use a much stronger method and a better cap system

than is presently there.

Hector will get into more detail on that alternative

and what led up to choosing that alternative. But I also

wanted you to know is we had an ad in the Inquirer back on,

I can't remember the date it was, the 27th of May we placed

an ad in the Inquirer which announced our four alternatives,

and the one that we prefer, the one we are recommending.

Nothing becomes final until we get comments from the public,

That is the public's chance to enter into the decisionraaking

PAR5000U

It tht page fluted in thit inamt it not at ntadabH.j>n ttgibU..t4label, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition 04 the ougtnal page, ii

Page 13: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0

1

•-

1iiiiIs!

t2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

It

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

6

process and we are having a 30-day comment period that

began back when the ad was in the paper. It ends June 29th

and we are going to be accepting all of your comments, i

At the bottom of this fact sheet that you all have,

you'll see on the back the last page, you'll have my name

and address and Hector's name and address where we will be

asking you to send your comments to us, Please, it says --

it did say postmarked in the advertisement, However, we

really need to receive those comments by the 29th, rather

than just postmarked by the 29th.

Also there is one little mistake I guess on this fact

sheet, You'll see under my name and phone number and under

Hector's name and phone number, my phone number is under

Hector's name and his phone number is under my name, If you

call one of these numbers, ask for the other person, I

guess that is it. We have a court reporter here this evening

because part of the process in this decisionmaking process

is to have an official record of anything that is said at

a public meeting that we hold anytime during the comment

period,

Also your written comments would be an official con-

tribution by you to the record as to what your opinion is,

It will enable us to be more responsive to what your ques-

tions are too, Our answers will not be sent back on an

individual basis, letter by letter. Rather it will be put

J (_________

flR5000|5

It the page Alined in thit ^namt it not at ntadab jn. leg4ble,,a4.,th/4 Mi;,:;/'label, it it due to Mbtta.nda.nd colon on condition ot the oniginat page.

Page 14: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

7 ;Ointo what is called a responsiveness summary, A respon-

siveness summary is response to all comments we receive from ji

any member of the public. And that's going to be attached

to the Record of Decision, And once this alternative becomesi

final or whichever alternative we decide on, then we'll put

together what is known as the Record of Decision. It's the

official record and choice of alternative for cleaning up

the site,

So we might as well get things started. Hector is

going to do a very brief presentation, a little bit about

what happened and what kind of alternative that we are

recommending. And after that we are going to open it up to

questions. What we are basically here for is for your (

questions.

Also, before I go on, I want you to know that we have

someone here from DER for the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Resources.

MR. ALEXANDER; Tim Alexander.

MR. REYNER; Jim Reyner (phonetic spelling).

MS. SINCLAIR; They are from the State Depart-

ment of Environmental Resources. And also Eric is here

from Congressman Kaufmann's office,

MR. WILCOX: Eric Wilcox from Congressman

Kaufmann's office.

MS. SINCLAIR; Anyway they are here also if you

I

&R50GOI&

It the page ij-timed in thit tnamt it not at ntadabl^t ,jon legible..a.~label, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition ot the oniginat page.

Page 15: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0

J

..

tH

!i2'•isI

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

28

3 !

have any questions, address them to the Congressman's office :,

or the DER.

I would like you to hold your questions until after

Hector is through with his presentation.

(Mr. Abreu-Clntron gives his presentation

using a. diagram as a reference material,)

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: Good evening. As Nanci

said, during the Remedial investigation we collected various

environmental samples throughout the Ambler Pile and through-

out the borough. Basically air samples were taken, water

samples were taken in the Wissahickon Creek. Air samples

were taken on the pile and around the pile and we made vari-

ous studies on the slopes to determine if they were stable

or not, One of the problems with the piles was that we felt

the slopes looked a little precarious, so we thought let's

take some physical samples to basically try to identify if

there is any slippage occurring on the piles.

The results of air samples showed that there is.no,

as we speak, there is no current emissions coming from the

pile, There is no asbestos apparently coming from the pile.

This was proven in various scenarios, With wind blowing

from the west, samples in this side or wind blowing from the

east, samples to this side,

The slope samples showed that the slopes are stable,

They are not slipping. In fact, the composition of the

-J

AR50COI7

' H tht page litntd in thit inamt it not at ntadabtt.. ttgiblt, a* thit--'&label, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition ot the oniginal page! "

Page 16: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

9

1 piles have made the slopes inside form a, how do I explain

2 it, The way the piles were originally there was a huge

I

-

ti•i1t«'

i

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

amount of calcium carbonates like a toothpaste-like material,

very wet and mucky and very white when you looked at it,

Apparently it's been drying up in the slopes area and it's

forming a cement type bond chat is very, very strong, So

we found no evidence of slippage on any of the slopes.

Based on this we decided to go with the option that

basically deals with maintaining the cap,

The two areas of alternatives we looked at was either

getting rid of the pile, or doing something with the pile

as it is now, The alternatives that dealt with eliminating

the pile were excavation and basically carting it away to r"

another asbestos landfill, bring it in bags and moving it

to nearest closest asbestos approved landfill, That alter-

native proved to be infeasible in the aspect that the amount

of the material was just so great it would take various years

to do and currently there is not a landfill close by that

could accept this waste. It would fill two landfills. Cost

is also a determination because it would cost around 190

million dolars to do that,

Of course, the major one was the exposing of the

asbestos to the locals, Bringing backhoes or bulldozers

digging into the piles and exposing everybody to asbestos,

We didn't want to do that.

J

flRSC'0018

lF<fce~p«ge 4U*td in thit inamt it not at " ""'-fJj" "/ ?'label, it it dut to tubttandand colon on condition o< the oUg*«al page.

Page 17: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0

"N

i

•-

i!i3

i

1

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

10The other alternative to removing it was vitrification

process which we talked abouc. Costing for that was around

300 million, Timewise it was also quite long, Six years,

I think, And again that involved digging into the piles and

exposing the public to the asbestos threat, We felt it

didn't merit doing .that, Treating ic on-site basically

involved leaving ic as is, which is the no action alternative

basically just not doing anything, just walking away, We

couldn't do that because we found various parts of the cap

seemed to have a little bit of erosion, We just couldn't

leave that there , After a few months or years ic's poss-

ible chat ic could grow and grow and expose asbestos again.

We also found very low readings but on che top of the

pile which at the time was never fully covered with a cap

due to the growth of trees on top. It's fairly difficult

co get on top, So we decided Co cover Chose with a two feet

cap of soil. Put grass and netting and everything. Con-

struct a gabion on Wissahickon Creek. A gabion being a

type of thing you see on che highway when you drive by shear

cliffs, Ic's like a concrete wall, The toe of this pile

ends directly into Wissahickon and during heavy rains

potential flooding could scour into it and cause it to be

exposed, We construct a concrete wall to avoid it and at

the same time kind of giving a lateral force to kind of hold

up the side which is very steep. Though it isn't slipping

u: ' fiR5:jOQ19

It the page iitmtd in thit t*ame it not at , . , , , ,label, it it due. to tubttandand colon on condition ot the oniginal page.

Page 18: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

i

-

i1

ijj2i\

t2

3

4

5

6

7

a9

to11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

"rit doesn't hurt to do chat, IAnother thins was a system of diverting runoff on the ;

pile, We decided to construct what we've opted potentially

co construct drainage ditches which is very basically con-

crete holding type system which would direct water away from

che pile and basically have rain water go towards the Wissa-

hickon or any nearby water area, Maintain Che fence. Well,

build a betcer fence actually, The current fence is not one

of the best, and I've seen various places where it is broken

into and kids — I don't know if ic's children of people up

there. I've seen various washing machines and refrigerators

within the boundaries of the pile, The security is not the

best. If anything, that is one of the biggest problems we S*

found. Many times I've come and I've seen refrigerators,

stoves, washing machines, bicycle tracks, beer bottles. It's

a temptation. It's a nice hill, They want to go up and

they think it's nice, But it is a problem.

There is also the problem of people apparently you

have come in and pulled a sampling of trees and bushes,

Come in and yanked them out. The problem with that, of

course, is that on the roots you might have asbestos cling-

ing to that and people don't realize that when you pull them

and take them home ,i and there might be a problem, Basically

it's Just a security problem. So we build a much more secure

fence with only one or two points of entry, making it very

It the page filmed in thit inant it not at nto.dable...on ttgiblt,at thi4 ~-label, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition ot the oniginal page.

Page 19: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

.-

Io

si»a

\

I

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

6

9

to11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12

difficult co get in. Better signs, Larger signs calking

about the hazards that exist.

The seeding ponds which are in becween che cwo piles,

chere is a filter system that *s used, They found very a

very small amount of asbestos in the cement in the bottom.

It is currently filled with water. We would drain that, fil-

ter che water for any asbestos, put it back in, and cap this,

That would be closed and covered. Any sore of maintenance

problem, any grass that might be filled in. Re-grass and

reseed,

I think chac's ic.

MS, SINCLAIR; We are going Co open it up to

questions, but I have one request, As I mentioned earlier,

we have a court reporter here, and it will go much easier

for her to hear your question if you don't mind, standing

up and speaking loudly and just stating if you are a resi-

dent, a local official, or a consultant, you know, Just

so she knows exactly who is asking the questions,

We are open now to public questions and comments,

FRANK ROMANO: I'm a resident and I've been talk-

ing about this asbestos pile for at least 15 years. And I

believe that unless you do something about the shape of

that pile which I didn't hear yet tonight, you are still

leaving an ugly eyesore in this community when it is possible

to do it in an option which you have not even discussed.

AH5U002!

It the page filmed in thit t*ame it not at ne.ada.ble. .on Itgiblt -a.,label, it it due. to tubttandand colon on condition ot the. oniginal page

Page 20: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I

.-

5i

!•i

i383i

t2

3

4

5

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

!

13 OThac :•', chac you should level that pile out, That sieans ic

isn't aken away, buc you are doing something with the pile, '

You level that pile out and bring it way down, say it might

be 20 feet. I don't know, What is che elevation right now?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON! Over 50 feet.

MR. RQMANO: Well you could bring it down to 15

or 20, It wouldn't be such an eyesore. And that could be

done very easily by where you have your fence cowards the

stream, instead of a fence putting a concrete wall down

along there, You are talking about five million. If you

put a concrete wall down that side, you can take and move

it over and I know your objection is that asbestos fibers,

But about ten years ago there was a contest or something,

to send ideas in as to how you would do that, And I pre-

sented that idea and also included in that idea that there

would be a relatively simple means of ensuring chac there

wouldn't be asbestos going into the air,

Now I was born and raised in this community, and also

I'm a chemist and I worked for an asbestos company for a

couple of years, So I know some of the characteristics of

asbestos and I represented that it would be very easy to get

a type of solution. I told them whac the solution was which

you would spray ver the pile where you were working and

that would penetrate and also encapsulate the asbestos

fibers and make them pretty resistant in the future to any

———— • ———___——— —————— flPPiAA/XLji ____—————

O

c

Page 21: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

014

decomposition,

Now chen after you've spread chac ouc and I also

stated that ic should have three or four feet of earth over

the top oc that. And then you could have a park, You could

have a park, You could have a swimming pool, You could do

all these things, .To do what the options are here chac

I've heard is noc really a solution that this town should

have because in che wintertime you could still come up

Butler Avenue and see chac ugly situation. And I think the

community should get together with an idea chac really sort

of levels that pile and make a park out of ic instead of

putting a fence around it and signs and all this kind of

stuff.

That's all I have to say right now,

MR. MOLHOLT: Frank, I calked Co you on the phone

many, many cimes. I want co comment in terms of the health

aspect of what you mentioned about turning mountains into

molehills. It seems to me chat from the perspective of

environmental protection, that you've addressed something

I think the agency not only hasn't looked at, but isn't

impowered by Congress to look at and that is environmental

beauty, You might want to go two directions, You might

1 it co level out the 50 foot mountain or build it up into

a thousand foot mountain and put on lifts and so on, It's

one person's beautiful mountain and another person's eyesore

M500023

iTtht page, {ilntd in thit </ta«e it not at Aeadabl.e.o* Ugit>it<atlabel, it it due to iub^ta«da*d colon on condition ot the oniginal page.

Page 22: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

15

in some cases, We don't have che power to, from che stand

poinc of beautifying Ambler, to spend more dollars to lower

the height of that mountain, And your proposal for wetcing

down asbestos during that huge operation still wouldn't be

as proceccive co che public as putting che kind of necs and

kind of vegecacion over the existing mountains as proposed

in alcernacive number four of che feasibility scudy, So I

Chink it's nice if we can do it. But we just don't have the

power to move around large pieces of land like that in order

to satisfy a beautifIcacion cype process rather chan a pub-

lic health or environmental type process,

MR. ROMANO; I certainly included public health

in this thing and beaucificacion is noC really, you know,

- 0

014 "I didn't say anything about planting flowers and oriental

shrubs or anything like that. But just to lower it so you

don't see that eyesore and we see it every day because we

live here, And

MR. MOLHOLTiThe good guys from, Mr. Abreu says

that the white mountains of Ambler are very much like the

White Cliffs of Dover. This is calcium. This is chalk.

MR. ROMANO: I know what it is.

MR. MOLHOLT: Right. It's 90 percent chalk, so in

a sense if it were 100 percent asbestos then maybe there

would be a bill of lading to stamp on it, We are really

talking about something that frankly, doesn't have to be

y/I R 50 0024

It the page. <4itntd in thit tnant it not at *eada6le_.o*-ttgibtt,A4..,thi4- ! --; llabel, it it due. to tubttandand colon on condition ot tht oniginal page. I

Page 23: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

n 12

3

4

S

6

1 7

a9

10

1112

13

14

IS

16

s 17] 18

i 19i 20

I 21

i n\ 23

24

29

16

when vegetated over, any more of an eyesore than -- I live •

near Che peac MOSS , . .

Thac's more than a 100 feet high and we don't consider

chac ugly.

MR, ROMANO! I am saying you do cover Ic and if

ic is cen percent, as I know ic happens to be in there, chac

is all che nore reason why you can grade ic over without too

much danger. And then, you know you put the situation over

there.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: The RI proved that the way

the piles exist, che way they were constructed, apparently

initially slag and cinders were used as a berm, a little

damn Co hold in. This was the Keasbey-Mattison, a long time

ago. They would put Inside of this walled in ...

magnesium waste and calcium chalk. As it grew up they keep

extending the berm, Now ic got to a point they started

asbestos and it started to go on cop of che cinders, Calcium

carbonate and then you start seeing asbestos, More and more

asbestos is inside that, So there are parts in che pile chac

are up to 50 percent asbestos, The ten percent is mostly

in the beginning part and some of the outside. That is ten

percent, But inside there is close to 50 percent asbestos,

MR. ROMANO: This asbestos is normal and natural

to the ground. You know, it was mined. You put it down

under three or four feet of earth and it's back Co its

It the page iilmtd in thit t«ane it not at itada.blt...on. Itgiblt.atlabel, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition ot the o*-tg.t«at page.

Page 24: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

2

3

4

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

''

natural scate sort of, and when you plant ic and you are "

going to have no movement of ground see. So I chink ic'si

a worthwhile option. j

ANTHONY DECEMBRINO: My name is Tony Decembrino ,

and I am a member of counsel, What is the plan to maintain ;i

Che propercy once che plan is put in effect. How would you

cut the grass and maintain the weeds however?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: This case it's currently as

of now, EPA would be doing the work out there probably.

We still haven'c goc —

(Inaudible conversaclon,)

As ic stands now EPA would be the agency chac would

be doing che work out chere, maintaining che property. /">

Maintenance of the propercy is under Che Job of DER, There

is a five year due process,

A VOICE: That is when the state enters into

a state Superfund contract with the Environmental Protection

Agency which we have not done,

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: This can be done and the

weeds can grow,

MR, MOLHOLT: Maybe Hector can explain the status

of the site.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: We are in the middle of that

now, Again because , . , It's feasible if they decide co

get involved. If they would pay for it, they would do it

Afi5uGG26

It tht pagt iitittd in thit <*«me it not at ntadabtA^ffi. Ugibtt<-*4..label, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition ot the carnal page

Page 25: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

n

O

t2

3

4

5

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

! "! ">

i I9•

j 20

5 21i8 22

]24

29

13

and they would be responsible for che maintenance,

But if 1C turns out EPA would do ic, we have Co calk '

to DER to gee some sore of agreement,

JEAN THOMPSON: I'm a residenc of Locusc Screet.

I spoke to you lasc ,,ear about this cutting the grass, It

has been cut once this year. I live right across che street

from chat site, which you know, We are plagued with bugs

all lasc year. My house especially on the outside was

covered, I spoke to Mr. Sigmore (phonetic spelling) about

it, That grass has been half way cut once this year, and

we have had a loc of rain, Last year, I don'c think it was

only cut about twice,

You speak of children going on that ground. I don't

know why you can't open that playground. The children go

up on top of the mountain anyway. They play up there.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: They shouldn't.

MRS, THOMPSON: They gee through the fence on

Locust Street alley, I have called the police and they come

down and as soon as they leave, they go right back up.

Those kids from out of Souch Ambler and go up there. We have

a lot of problems but you can't call the police for' every-

thing.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: We do plan to put a better

fence for security, It's true you can'c avoid a child doing

it, They shouldn't do it, of course, but it's very difficult

It the page tUlmed in thit inamt it not at ntadabtt..o* Itgibtt.at thUlabel, it it due. to tubttandand colon on condition ot the oniginal page.

Page 26: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

2

3

4

B

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

S "i IBSI 20

1 21

i 22

1 23

24

29

Co control. Hopefully, with che new eight foot fence

barbed wire --

MRS. THOMPSON: They don't play on che site

wnere the playground is. Ic's back of the alleyway that

they get through. They even go hunting up there,

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: The whole side is going to

be totally surrounded,

MRS. THOMPSON: What is this, is this a new

pump or something you put on Locust Street at the bottom of

the mountain, It's yellow, It looks like a well of some

type of pump,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; A tube that is monitoring,

That is to take groundwater samples. C

MS. SINCLAIR; Groundwater samples?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; Not groundwater, I'm sorry.

To take borings, would actually dig In and you take a core

of dirt.

MRS. THOMPSON; It's not an air sampler?MR. ABREU-CINTRON; No, no. That waa done on

the site.MICHAEL HAYGN: I'D Michael Hayen, the Mayor.

First of all, what ia the coat going to be in the

borough now or in the future on this? Also Tony asked you

a qui scion who ia going to maintain it and Nicolet is in the

raidd) s of bankruptcy. Now who will take it over, and who

It,the page Kilned ,' tliit t*ane 4* not at ntadabt.t,J>l Iegl6lt,,<u•ttlabel, it it due to ,ubttandand colon on condition o< the oniginal page.

Page 27: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

n••

i

--

j!

ij!s1I

)

i2

3

4

6

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

28

20

will maintain it, and who is going to take this cost over?

Is the state taking this all over?

MS. SINCLAIR: Under Superfund with Che consent

agreement we entered into, we had RI/FS was paid for by the

responsible party, In this case Superfund paid for it,

Nicolet was bankrupt throughout the project as you know. We

still have one more responsible party that we are going to

be developing another consent decree with for them Co look

into che design for the consent agreement for them to look

into doing che design for the cleanup. So if they agree to

this and if our negotiations are successful with then,

a notice letter will be going out to them within the next

week or two. If they agree to that, then they will pay for

the next stage of the project, which is the design, And

then after that, we'll negotiate with them to see whether

or not they will cake on the costof this cleanup. But if

that doesn't come through, if our negotiations fail with

the other responsible party, then under the Superfund Law,

Superfund will pay. We'll get the funds from Superfund.

there will be no cost incurred by the borough.

MR. HAYEN: la that only as long as Superfund

is existing?

MS. SINCLAIR; The Superfund will stay in exis-

tence. It waa reauthorized — first of all, it was initially

passed, the Bill, in 1980. And up until 1986, we still had

BR5&CGE9

It the page lUmtd in thit inamt it not at ntadabte.,J>n,ltgibttua4..thit &label, it it due to -substandard colon on condition ot the oniginal page,:!

Page 28: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

money from Superfund .and we were using Superfund funds,

21O

I'm sorry about that, that didn't sound right, Any-

way, it was reauthorized in 1986, It was a much stronger

bill, It had more teeth in it, We had more action on the

enforcement end of the project, Most of our sites now,

especially in Region'111 are enforcement sites, And we are

getting a lot of response from so-called potentially respon-

sible parties, And sites in general, we consider any respon-

sible party a past or present owner of a site. Anyone who

generated waste that was found at the site and any haulers

of waste to a site. That bill will be up for reauthoriza-

tion in 1991. I doubt very much if there is a Congreaanan

in this country or Senator who will refuse to approve extend

ing the Superfund Bill. We have a lot of tough waste sites

across the country. Right now there is nine hundred some-

thing on the national priority list. Ambler Asbestos site

is also on that list, That is a list of top priorities

across the country that need this Superfund money for clean-

up or investigation.

Right now, the bill is at 8,5 billion dollars for the

whole country. The next reauthorization might increaae that

to a higher amount. Either way we will always have a Super-

fund Bill and as each tine that it gets reauthorized, we

are learning more fron paat experiences so therefore, it

will be a much stronger bill, Just as this one was. Our

/~s

It tht page iiilntd in thit inant it not at readable .on legible a* thl ^ --label, it it due. to tubttandand colon on condition ot the original page.

Page 29: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0

1

--

iiIi\i\

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

' 12

13

14

19

18

17

18

18

20

21

22

23

24

29

22

original bill was 1,6 billion dollars, and ic was the first

time chat anyone was involved with such a large scale of

cleanup of these large abandoned landfills and waste sites.

So now this bill that was reauthorized in '86 was a

lot stronger and we hope from any kind of experience, all

the experiences that we have across the country of cleaning

up these sites and studying them, Congress will make it an

even tougher bill or stronger bill, especially enforcement-

wise,

So never is any cost that is expended through EPA to

clean up hazardous waste, costs are never picked up by the

local officials or local borough or township. Even the bill

itself is a tax on the Petro Chemical Company and Broad Base

Manufacturing. So it's actually the businesses that we con-

sider potential responsible parties who originally contributed

to the Superfund Bill each year, It's their tax and the none

is put into a trust fund.

MR. DECEMBRINO; It's about as likely for that

tab as for the maintenance of 309. There was supposed to be

a throe year carry-over. Supposed to be 40 years?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; It's 40 years, yeah.

Twenty years.

MR. DECEMBRINO: What waa the total price on

that?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Two hundred seventy million

____' flR50003l

It the page Kilned In thit inane, it not at readable.,or legible, a.4thl.*-label, It it due to substandard color or .condition ot the original page

Page 30: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

--

IIi|iI

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

dollars,

MR. MOLHOLT: ' That ia 20 years?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Twenty years.

MR. STEVEN RESNICK: Steve Resnick from Borough

Council. I Just have one question. I have been invovled

with the firemen ia the town. Before we had just the moun-

tains up there and no grass or anything up there. Now we

have a problem. Potential problem that we could have a

fire up on those mountains with the growth. What hazard is

it to a man, the manpower going up on those mountains? We

are worried about stirring up the dust and everything if we

are going to move anything, if we have to fight a fire up

there, we will be tramping in it. What is the hazard to the (

manpower fighting these fires?

MR. MOLHOLT: There is no contact threat from

asbestos, You have to inhale it. As you indicated it would

only be hazardous if you did stir it up. If the cap is going

to be put on as according to this plan, there would be no

exposed asbestos. Aabeatoa, if there were shrubbery or

bruah burning would still be — the asbestos would all be

under two feet of soil. So you would not have the ability

to stir that up during any kind of a fire. '

Aa Mr. Romano correctly identified, water is a good

way to abate any asbeatos problem even if there is one. So

I think you are in pretty good hands and no prohibition to

u

n i:! 50 00 32

It the page Kilned In this tra«e it not at readable .or legible as.label, It Is due to substandard color or conditioned tht oniginal page.

Page 31: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

D2

3

4

5

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

J 14

IS

16

iS 18

j

j 20

! 2ii 22

| 23

24

28

O

24to going out to those slopes to put out any potential fire.

A VOICE: There is a comment in here that indi-

cates —

(Conversation not reportable,

My question is in reference to alternative three,

Che vitrification solution and there's a comment in your

report that indicates that vitrification for this sice ia

not possible. And I'm not sure, I would like for you to

explain why it is not possible.

MR. ABREU-CITRON; When we look at alternatives,

we look at different factors, basically coat is a factor,

technicalities involved in doing it. la it technically

possible to even do it, Public health and welfare more or

less. Will the options cause a public health hazard, what-

ever, and regulations. Is it a process that is under regu-

lations or approved by the state. Vitrification was looked

at first costwise. The cost was just pretty high, 300 milllo

dollars, 290 more or less.

Technically it was considered not a feasible idea

because of Just the length of tine it would take, 20 years.

And' the need to bring in the necesaary equipment to do the

procesa, we would need to tap into some sort of electric

supply, The City of Ambler does not have sufficient electri-

city necesaary to do this process. It's a huge anount of

electric used, two electrodes create an arcn. There is two

It the page Kilned In this t*<*me Is not as readabl.e .or legible as this - 1 - - -label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 32: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

• •

1

-

IjI3|ii

i2

3

4

S

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

28

cypes sticking, two electrodes in and creating electric

current and melting it underground, The other one is digging

ic up and burning ic into glass,

Healthwise it was a threat just digging into the

piles, You have to use some sort of system to contain this

and we are talking '20 years of containment. We just felt

it wasn't fair to the local residents on Locust Street or

anywhere nearby to have them subjected co this excavation

for the next 20 years.

Ic could be controlled maybe. But what if ic rains.

Most of che substance in there is as we say, calcium caron-

nate in che state it is in now, very liquid. Kind of like

a chocolate covered cherry, Break off the chocolate and it

will all ooze out. You have quite a lot to handle. Not only

that, but asbestos. It's just, healthwiae, we didn't think

it was correct,

Regulatorywiae, ic's been a semi new alternative uaed

in schools and other agencies. A huge amounc of subacance

makes it not very feasible.

A VOICE: The vitrification process, waa this

coat baaed on the electrodes?

MR. ABREU-CITRON: Both of them', We looked at

both.A VOICE; In that price range?

MR. ABREU-CITRON: More or less. Yes, more or

O

It the page KUwed In this t*«*e Is not as readable..or legible. alabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition oj the original page.

Page 33: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

314

19

It

17

IB

20

21

22

23

24

26less. The only one, the electrode one needed more electri-

city, whereas the other one you have to build some sort of

facility which means you have to build a plant and smokestackt

and a staff of people there, and also a certain amount of

glass, It's 80 percent asbestos, 20 percent raw glass. So

you have to get glass from somewhere,

MR. HAYEN: That would almost take care of two

problems. First we had the incinerator and we also have

people needing to get rid of glass. It would take care of

two problems at one time. Not a bad Idea.

MR. MOLHOLT: Lee me comment on chac. If you

were Co go down with vitrification process and cry, for

instance, co curn sand Into glass, it's a kind of glassifi-

cation like making glass, You have to have as Hector men-

tioned, 80 percent asbestos. And you don't have 80 percent

asbestos in that mountain. The only feasible way would be

if there was much more asbestos chare than is present, With

leaa than ten percent aabestoa, you cannot turn that mountain

into glass without adding more glass than Anbler can supply,

Also nore electricity than you can get from the power plant.

yeara?MR. HAYEN: Where did the number come up, 20

MR. ABREU-CITRON: Baaed on the 1.26 million

cubic yarda based on the number given by che vitrific people.

You can read the report. I think they were aaylng they could

It the page 4Ume.d in thit tnamt it not at neadable,or. legible,a*label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 34: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

IBIB20

21

22

23

24

29

27

it ten tons in a day, Ten hour shifts, working seven days Cj>

a week, Non-stop, And you do the mathematics 1.26 million

cubic yards, you come out with 20 years.

MR. ROMANO: I would like to add that then the

pile of the glass plus the asbestos would be bigger than

the pile you already have.

MR. MOLHOLT: Exactly. A glass mountain.

MR. ROMANO; Yes. And you have junk glass to

put in roads where stone is cheaper and easier or better.

So the vitrific process as I complained about is the stupid-

eat idea I ever heard of.

STEPHEN SAGE: Steve Sage, Borough Council.

13 "« W»B uwb juab « i.wl.,1. nw Ufttj a ukAAAl*/ buwpall/ U» /**N

well, specifically we're a water company, You've addressed

We are not just a town. We are a utility conpany as

14

16 the surface water system with the concrete wall. Can you

tell me how the cap will keep asbestos fibers from migrating

into the --

Have you taken a baseline check?

MR. ABREU-CITRON: EPA current standing, aabeatos

does not travel in groundwater. EPA regulations ia not the

correct word. EPA thought process of aabeatos and ground-

water ia that asbestos does not migrate in groundwater

basically because of the size of the particles. What happens

ia the particles move and hit againat a grain of sand,

Another one hits on that one and in fact, it creates ita own

/V M500036

It the page Kilned In this dname. it not at reada6l.e_or( legible as <hi»ialabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 35: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

r> 12

3

4

S

8

8

9

to11

12

13

14

16

16

i 17S 18

3j 20

1 21

d 22

i24

26

28

filter, More and more asbescos fibers pile up and create

a filter. Basically clean on this side. Nothing comes out.

It does not migrate at all in the groundwater,

MR. MOLHOLT: It has been measured In asbestos

indications.

MR. ABREU-CITRON: yea.

MR, SAGE: So our water system is not ac peril

using the cap system?

MR. ABREU-CITRON: No, no.

JOSEPH BRESNAN: I am assiscanc solicitor for

the Borough. The fact sheet indicaCes chac you are talking

about four alternatives. Really it's three since no action

is really no alternative. You wouldn't have gotten involved

in the first place, Are these the only alternatives? Are

there other alternatives that have been considered at other

sites that were rejected in this particular instance, or

are you saying that the alternatives that are listed in here

are the only 'ones that ever existed for getting rid of a site

like this?

MR. ABREU-CITRON: I say this is the noat exten-

sive one that has been done on a aabeatos site. Aa of today

this is poaaibly the only alc'ernaclve we could figure.

We have looked ac -- chere is another sice in New Hampshire.

There ia one in Illinois I chink, and I've been in conver-

sation with their people and we have interchanged information

Ali500037

It the page Kilned In this <rame Is not as readable .or legible,..alabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 36: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

18

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

29

and all that and those other two sites have come up with the

same options we have here, basically capping it and keeping

it there, Vitrification was something that came up recently.

They looked at it.

MR. BRESNAN: The thrust of what you seem to be

saying abouc vitrification is that it's so large that how

many years it would take to get rid of it, And with option

numer one, actually number two, it's so large that there is

nowhere to put it. So is it safe to say your position is

that anytime you have a mountain that is chat size, the only

thing you can do is cover it up as it sits?

MR. ABREU-CITRON: Yas.

MR. MOLHOLT: It might be that other nountains

that have some kind of hazardous waste that might get into

the groundwater. If it's aabeatos, that's the best solution,

MR. ABREU-CITRON: If there was another sub-

stance , we would have to remove it.

MR. BRESNAN: One other question. On Page Two

ic indicates that you first became involved when there was

a complaint brought by a resident of Ambler about the possi-

bility of che ambient travel of the asbestos. Do you have

any docunented cases of people from that neighborhood or any-

where in Ambler as we sit here, that Indicate that they have

some physical impairments or disability chat is directly

related to the asbestos?

O

u

AB500038

It the page Kilned In this inamt it not at readable..or legible as thls 'label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 37: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0

J

12

3

4

S

6

! 78

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

SS «•i "i 20! 21

] 22

| 23

24

29

30

MS. SINCLAIR: We don't have any health reports,

Under Superfund the EPA as much as we can take care of haz-

ardous waste problems to keep ic from affecting che residents,

one thing that che bill doesn't allow for is such areas of

medical monitoring, That Is done by the State Health Depart-

ment. And no, we never ask them for health records. But

we do ask them for concerns that they might have. Some

people might feel that a certain kind of condition could

have been aggravated or contributed by the site.

MR. BRESNAN; Well, that Is my question.

MS. SINCLAIR: We have community relations plan

on the site and that is also in the repository and that ia

the only place where we actually — Che only purpose of Chat

plan is toreport; any concerns that citizens might have,

and any kind of health effects that they believe they per-

ceive could be from the site were listed in that community

relations plan. That is available at the Wissahickon Public

Library.

MR. MOLHOLT: If you look at the monitoring there

ia no impact to the Ambler community, On the other hand,

there are two factors that do represent a threat. One ia

that many of the residents wdrk in Che plants and the occu-

pational exposure is certainly nothing — excuse the pun —

nothing to sneeze at.

Second is that many reaidenta that work at the plant

Kilned in this t<«ne Is not at readable.. , legible. <u tkti$, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 38: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I

-

ijii|I\

i2

3

4

S

a7

8

9

to11

12

13

14

18

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

•Agot the asbestos and were able to put the asbestos in their

attics and crawl spaces for free. There are still homes

that exist in that state and they do represent a threat to

chJ homeowners and to the community.

JOHN DURKIN: I am a resident.. I am not sure

I understand the numbers, If the mountains are only ten

percent asbestos, why is there such a restriction as far as

saying it has to go, If you were to remove it, it couldn't

go to toxic waste sites. It would fill up those two sites,

If it's 90 percent chalk, then I am not sure I understand

that.

MR. MOLHOLT: Ic's hard to dig out ten percent

and leave 90 percent, That is part of the answer. r

MR. DURKIN: So they look at it as a whole?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON : Yes. We can't leave part

of it there. We have to take the whole of it.

GEORGE SAURMAN: State Representative. I have

a number of questions also. I am a resident of Anbler and

was on Council and Mayor for several years.

We dealt with this problem in many ways and there waa

a state health study nade rather extensive study made and

at that time the consequences were the verdict waa there ia

no health hazard unless the surface is disturbed, and then

we had a aituation not too long ago where free asbestos waa

discovered and yet the anblent air aanplea still indicated

D

. PARaOlJOHO

It the page Kilned In this faamt it not as readable. .or legible as.label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 39: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

n• •

1

-

iSi3

ii

\

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

' 12

13

14

IS

16

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

32

there was nothing in the air.

So, is that basically where we were?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: What was Che question?

MR. SAURMAN: What I am concerned about is the

past and the present health of the residents in and around

these waste piles and the concern that spending millions of

dollars on this site will inculcate into che minds of people

not only here, but in other areas, because we had this where

residents or people calling from California that want to move

in and worked in Fore Washington have said I don't wane Co

be in Anbler because of the asbestos.

Now, and I might just add this as a footnote and say

that I am really happy that you're going to put an eight

foot fence with barbed wire there and big signs on it indi-

cating that there is a hazard right in the middle of our

comnunity. Now that is going to do . tremendously for our

property values and I thank you for that because when you

have made theae other conaiderationa, I'm sure you haven't

thought about property values in our community or the con-

cern! of our people.

Now, when we first had this problem I suggested to the

Department of Environmental Resources and EPA and the Depart-

ment of Health naybe we ought to do some cheat x-rays and

find out if theae people have had any problems. They aaid

no, that would Just create sone false security naybe. Maybe

It the page Kilned In this inane. Is not as readable _or legible as this-- -label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 40: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

•'

I

II3i|di

i2

3

4

6

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

33

they will have it. It takes 20 years for asbestos to

develop so we can't do that.

What I am concerned about now is that I hear a study

and I'm sorry that Mr. Romano doesn't like vitrification,

but it has been successfully used in the Navy Yard in Scotlan

to remove asbestos, .

What I am further concerned about is I just heard a

report that 40 percent of all the public buildings in

Philadelphia have asbestos in them, What I am further con-

cerned about is moat of our schools throughout Pennsylvania

and che nation have asbestos in them.

Now we can't go around and cover up asbestos all over

the country. We can't cover the buildings. We've got to

find some kind of a solution.

Now there is a solution in terns of vitrification.

We are not going to create piles of glass. There are other

uses for that material. It can be used as landfill and

clean landfill without any toxic problems whatsoever, and

therefore, it can be moved if that's all that ever happened

to it, But there can be other uses, and a little research

I'n sure would develop such uaea.

I've seen it for instance in little colorful squares

and I think that that could be used In a building naterial

type thing, At the very least, if just che scones chat are

made or the particles that are nade were1 used for landfill,

(

^

D

"j

Afi50001l2

It_the page Kilned In this t*ame Is not as readable.or legible as thls Ilabel, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original pagt. "ij

Page 41: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

-

i|iiii\

i2

3

4

S

6

7

B

9

to11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

34

they could be sold and while they would be competing with

gravel would probably bring about nine million dollars as

I understand it from one of the processors.

The plant that would be established in Ambler, the

figures that I've heard were not 270 million, but somewhere

between 100 and 200' million perhaps to build. That's to

build the plant and to build a plant that could be built in

compartments so chat when you have and I understand there

is an asbestos pile in Plymouth Township, not too far from

here. And we're not going to talk about that. That is

another major problem that would develop. And there ia also

a waste pile not far from the pile that we are treating

which isn't being considered.

But we have an asbestos problem and it disturbs me

because right now we are landfilling asbestos with no noti-

fication that that's chere so we're Just putting a time bomb

down for someone else to dig up later on.

Why don't you seriously look at getting rid of this

stuff and making it into something that is safe. You've

talked about coat and listening to the technicalitiea, the

length of time, again you say that thesn are the figures

that you've had. We've met with the people' in vitrifix.

They talked about the volume. There were nowhere near 20

years, Nowhere, To accomplish this purpose of getting rid

of these things. So there seems to be some conflict between

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable..or legible,as.this- •--label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 42: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

--

sj3ji!

i2

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

18

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

35

Che numbers in terms of what it costs, between the length

of time and we are calking about a technology that can be

transfered from this sice to other sites, I gueas the major

question that I have is, ia it a problem for the United

States Government to cake care of asbestos in Ambler,

Pennsylvania, or Is 'EPA going Co look at asbestos throughout

Che nation. And if you're going to look at asbestos through-

out the nation, then why aren't the parts of this plant that

are being talked about or could be talked about, why aren't

they movable to other sices and cherefore, the cost of it

prorated over several sites rather than juat against this

one thing, Why can't we then also consider what the value

of that land will be once we've cleared it of asbestos and

property values in Ambler and the health and the welfare

which you've also hold here as one of the considerations,

I consider to be morale. I consider that health and welfare

is —

MS. SINCLAIR: Hector is going to answer your

question.

MR. SAURMAN: Let me direct the queation nore

specifically then to two things, I Juat saw Dr. Roberts come

In so it will be interesting'of vitrifix, it will be interest

ing now co see why Che conflict between the cost at 270 some

million dollars that is Hated here, and some lesser costs

how that figure waa arrived at, one queation and naybe I'll

\AR5000IJ*

\ J

0

J

/«<,?/* PMiUMd in thit tnamt it not at readable ..or legible as thlslSl' ,label, a it due to tubttandand colon on condition oi the orlflinai 2f«. 7-

tht original pgt.

Page 43: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

IB

20

22

23

24

29

36

stop with that one for che moment,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: We knew about vitrifix. Our

contractor contacted vitrifix. In fact, I went out there my-

setlf and the doctor can attest to that, I went out to West

Virginia where there is a pilot study, We saw the process.

He had a small demonstration there. I was there and my con-

tractor or his reporter came with me. We saw the process

and everything. We were told, we told them later on, we

need estimate numbers and information so we can make a good

esclmate of how much chis process is going to cost. They

looked into it. They called, I'm sorry, I don't know your

last name, Robert, I'm sorry, Dr. Roberts. And they got

the necessary information cost breakdowns, estinated tonnage

per day. Baaed on the pure mathematics, we came up with a

number, how many tons per day we were told by the vitrific

people chey could handle what is between five to ten. That

is the number they gave us, It was basically calculating

the amount of volume we have there. Everything. Not just

the asbestos, but everything, calcium carbonate, everything.

That volune multiplying it by the, how much tona that ia,

how many tona per day you can handle and arrived at the

amount of days it would cake'and that ia how we came up with

20 years, It waa all infornation given to us that we

looked into it. In terms of the 20 years, it's Just simple

mathematics. How many tons it handles per day and how many

AR5000H5

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not as readable..or legible.as this--label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal page.

Page 44: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

--

isf3ji\

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

• 12

13

14

19

10

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

37

tons we have there. So we have the amount of days,

In terms of the request in Che health threat to our

present and pasc, as I've said in my calk, presently there

is no health problem, There is no evidence of emissions at

all. There is nothing coming from the pile in terms of

asbestos, It is covered over,

MR. MOLHOLT; That information should be publicly

available in terms of any future employer or residents that

would like to move into the area. That is something that

the agency can help you with. As Hector ia implying, as I

think you say indirectly when you were talking, if people

had been exposed to asbestos in the past, that health threat

can exist for another 20, 30 or 40 years to the people who

have been exposed in the past. We are trying to insure

by remedial action no future asbestos exposure will occur

fron that pile, That is the best we can do.

MR, ROBERTS: You stated five to ten tons per

day. That is not the case, You can have a furnace melter

of any size you like, When I was involved in this project

sotae two years ago, I was recommending a time period of what-

ever waa desired by the community. Say three to five years,

in which case you would have an installation capable of

dealing with material at several hundred tona per day,

MR. MOLHOLT: How much would that coat? How

much would several hundred ton a day cost?

CD

3

'vAR500046

It the page Kilned In-ihls inane, it not at readable or legible as this i^ 5label, it it due. to substandard color uor conSltlon o| the original Sale T :

Page 45: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

' 12

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

It

12

) 1314

IS

16

i 17S ,8

I "j 20

1 21

i 22

1 23

24

29

O

38

MR. ROBERTS: You didn't ask for that informa-

tion.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Our contractor said we did.

MR, ROBERTS: Someone spoke co my deputy and the

total conversation was half an hour on the telephone. During

that time che main concern chat the gentleman had, under-

standably, was the ability and problems of moving the

material from the heap to the process, which I have to agree

is a technical problem that needed to be tackled. There was

no discussion of the range of sizes of the machines which

are available because that would have been made very clear

that it's anything from two tons per day to 300 tons per day

in a single unit. And you can have mulci units. Also

there waa no discussion as to whether the glasa which is

produced can be made into a viable product which would miti-

gate the expense quite considerably,

MR. MOLHOLT: Dr. Roberts, wouldn't you agree cha

ic is a large investment , in 'equipment used to melt asbestos

fibers and glass?

MR. ROBERTS: Yes. '

MR. MOLHOLT: Wouldn't you agree that if you

expand that equipment by ten fold, you increase at least the

investment up-front costs from 100 to 200 million to a bil-

lion to two billion?

MR. ROBERTS: No. There has never been any

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable ,o«. legible as. this ,-label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 46: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

i "j 18

i 1Bi 20

{ 21

i 22

1 23

24

29

suggestion from us that Che up-front cost was going to be

a hundred million dollars.

MR. MOLHOLT: What would you estimate the up-

front costs would be for a ten to 15 con per day facility?

MR. ROBERTS: Ten to 15 ton per day you say?

The up-front costs. of installing the unit would be of the

order of

ton per

three million dollars.

MR. MOLHOLT; How much would it cost for 100

day facility?

MR. ROBERTS: I haven't got that figure, but

taking it by extrapolation of figures that I do know, I would

say around ten to 15 million dollars.

to make

asbestos

ment in

in other

in other

reduced

cost.

MR. SAURMAN: And che point that I waa trying

before is chat the question is, are you through withwhen you leave Ambler because this plant, che invesc-

this plant which is an investment can then be uaed

sitea and there are other sites, and by using it

sites, che cost pro-rated to Ambler ought to be

rather than Anbler, this site, absorbing all of that

MR. MOLHOLT: I think Che gentlenan ia proposing

this becone an aabeatos vitrification capital of the UnitedStates.

plan.

And I an not sure the residents will endorse that

MR. SAURMAN: I think you probably missed what

O

AR&OOGU8

"TTthT page Kilned In this <rawe Is not as readab cr.Jeglble. as. thtiilabel' it itdut to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht oniginal page

Page 47: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

. 12

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

ts16

i "j 18

i wi 20

1 „j 22

1 23

24

29

')

40

I said, but I appreciate your insinuation which obviously

would cause people to become concerned if we were going co

make this che asbescos capital of the world for treatment,

I said that che plant could be taken apart and moved to

other sices. I agree chac it's not a good idea Co try and

move this asbestos, all over the country, and in fact, have

legislation dealing with that, But I think, and It has to

be carefully controlled because it is ambient as far aa the

air is concerned, and therefore, it has to be covered. And

we can't allow ic to get off into the air. But if you take

the plant and build it so that that plant can then be taken

down again and moved into another place, then the cost of

it is simply moving it, not building it. The furnaces are

there. That equipment can be transferred. And therefore,

chac cose can be pro-raced. And because you are able Co sell

the finished product and it's not going Co put another glass

mountain here of several hundred tons or whatever, several

more Jjres, It will remove and free that land for use which

ultimately this little eight, ten or square mile of Ambler

property could sure use that as a tax base. Land that's

productive rather than land at the present tine and particu-

larly land that would have ah eight foot fence with barbed

wire and warning signs on that we got a hazard right in our

midst.

MR. ROMANO: May I say sonething on that? Well,

flR5000i<9

TTthe page Kl/ntd in'this <r«ne Is not at reada6le..o* '"'v'j/label. It is due to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht oniginal page

Page 48: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

--

tii3!ai\

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

41 QMr, Saurman, Che vitrification process again from the chemi-

cal standpoint is merely a matter of heating the asbestos

until you no longer have the hazardous property; isn't chat

ri'ghc, doccor?

MR. ROBERTS: Ic's a simplification of 1C.

MR. ROMANO: But ic is chac in total you make

1C so that it is no longer —

MR. ROBERTS: It ceases to be a dangerous ma-

terial.

MR. ROMANO: That fiber that ia a hazard. Well,

why not stop there? In other words, the whole procesa

doesn't seem to make sense because it has lost its hazardous

property once you've heated it. Why then mix it with broken C

glass and forn sone other product when you've gotten rid of

the hazard that was the principal reason for the whole oper-

ation?

MR. ROBERTS: The reason for that is If you have

a simple Incineration procesa, there is no way you can guar-

antee the conpletion of the proceaa. I've looked at this

very carefully, which is why we finished up with ch« glass-making process. So that we nake the procesa safe,

MR. ROMANO: Did you say there is no way that

you can guarantee that all the fibers have been disintegrated

MR. ROBERTS: Correct. I said your suggestion

of simple incineration process —

}

r

0

hK5Q0050

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable ...o*. legible, at.label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 49: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

j

12

3

4

5

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

• 12

13

14

IS

16

Ii ,8

! 1B\ 20

1 21

i 22

1 23

24

2S

42

MR. ROMANO: Not simple. You heat it to what

you say 1400 degrees?

MR. ROBERTS: Seventeen hundred degrees Centi-

grade, Let me reply to your question, sir, If you simply

heat the material to 1700 degrees Fahrenheit you will indeed

destroy asbestos. However, there is no way that you can

guarantee that process will be complete, There is no

guarantee that that process wili so to completion. It is

inherently a dangerous process if you use incineration for

it. I have gone into this in great detail. What I finished

up with is going to the glass-making process to insure that

the product under all circumstances can never contain any

asbestos, It is the only way you can do it, Fron a —

MR, ROMANO: From a chenical standpoint, I am

a chemist and I've worked with asbestos as a chemist, and

you know you keep saying that the incineration procesa does

not do the job. In effect you say that and you are expect-

ing that some more is disintegrated as you make glass.

MR. ROBERTS: No, I am not expecting that. The

aituation in any process will go wrong, People will make

mistakes. A controller will fail. Under those circum-

stances, unbeknownst to the operator aabescbs will go through

the process and will appear in the product. That ia the

same with any industrial process. Unless as I have been able

to achieve the process is intrinsically safe. It ia

u

W50005I

It tht page. Kilned In this inane, it not at readable .or legible as this--label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 50: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

• •

1

.-

5!

!3j1i •

i2

3

4

S

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

43 (•

absolutely physically impossible for any material to pass

through that process without having been heated to more than

2000 degrees Fahrenheit, thus insuring that the product is

always under all circumstances free from asbestos. That is

why we go to glassmaking, I started by looking at inciner-

ation aa you suggested because it's the most direct way,

Unfortunately, it's a dangerous method.

MR. ROMANO: I didn't use the term incineration.

I said just get it up to the temperature that destroys,

MR. ROBERTS: Your definition.

MR. ROMANO: Clearly then any other part of that

procesa could go off like you said, and have asbestos fiber

going all over the town because other things didn't work? V.

MR. ROBERTS: No.

HOPE SWISHER: I am a resident of Ambler. I'm

concerned about the health factors. The gentleman in the

blue shirt, you say there is no health hazard coning out of

the piles now, But you know volcanoes stay silent for a cer-

tain period and they do erupt occasionally. I Chink if we

have a chance Co get rid of these piles I would like to see

it done. I think the process which you are recommending ia

cosnetlc, It's putting a bandaid on a carbuncle. That

asbestos is always going to be in there. I trust the opinion

of che gentleman of Che scientific coranmity chat has spoken,

and I do not fully understand the technicalities of it. Aa

\AB50Q052

/«(,?$* P«9e K^med In this inam it not at readable,.** legible as tnlSIlabel, it it due. to substandard color on condition oi the original page.

Page 51: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

D

1

-

i!i3|3

J

•)

t

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

44

a resident I would like Co see the piles go, When I first

heard of vitrification, I thought it was a boon for Ambler

and I would really like to see it, che piles removed if at

all possible,

MR. MOLHOLT: I would like Co address che latter

part of your comment first, and then go back Co che health

problems. I don't think we are conduccing a scientific de-

bace abouc the virtues or lack thereof of vitrification.

I think we have some vested interest present. We also have

a bit of indecision as co some of the problems that would

be faced physically.

All I can guarantee you there is that through our con-

tractors the problem is looked at with no vested interest.

You can't listen to Joe Izuzu and buy a car without a little

bit of polish, that isn't the way it's going to be,

So In terms of the health rap, we should face up to

two things. The first is at the moment from extensive air

sampling, there is no asbestos in Ambler from that pile that

represents a human health threat. That is Che preaenC sit-

uation with no extra remediation.

The renediation that is proposed will insure that that

health threat remains at its' low stage forever. Borrowing

national disasters like volcanoes or tornadoes and other

things and believe me a little asbestos in the air under '

those situations will be Anbler's leaat problen.

fl'R500053

Page 52: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

ifI3ji\

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

18

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

So you're going to stabilize chat agalnsc all of che

probable natural disasters, All of che probable rain, all

of che probable wind. That situation will only become more

and more solid over time, As Mr. Abreu mentioned, this la

a hill that is turning into concrete. This is a hill that

is turning into solid chalk aa the water evaporates out, as

the calcium carbonate goes out to cinder blocks and forms

a solid wall, This will become a more stable situation with

time and with the netting over the top, with the soil on top

of thac, whac you will have is a complece encapsulation.

It is the best wecandoeven if we move it to another site,

in terms of mixing the material.

So I an not speaking with a vested interest standpoint,

I am speaking to you aa a toxicologist that ia concerned

about health problems. I an firmly convinced that this is

the best possible solution aside from che cosmetic value or

lack thereof of the mountain itself, I believe that fron a

health standpoint, you are getting absolutely che besc deal.

And I wouldn'c be sitting here today, I wouldn't be working

with the agency if I didn't have those interests and I did

not beleive in that particular solution.

PETE PETSKY (phonetic spelling).' I an a private

consulcant. In your RI/FS report available to the public,

are all the specifics available to alternatives two and three

such as volune, such aa site designation?

1

D

O

AR500054

fj' -fi'ti,, naat 4nmt_a in thit t*ane Is not as readable.-?* leglbje,irthe oaoe Kilned In this t*«ne Is not as readable..?* legible, as this-label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page

Page 53: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

••

1

..

iI3|Jj

12

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

18

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

46

MR. MOLHOLT: He wants to know if all the aspects

of the other alternatives have been spelled out in the RI/FS

study,

1 MR, ABREU-CINTRON: Yes, it's all in detail.

Everything is broken down from sice preparacion all the way

through the final process.

MS. SINCLAIR; Mayor, did you have a question?

MR. HAYEN: In 1971 and '72 there was nothing

wrong. We are now back in 1988 nothing is wrong again. Are

we going to be nothing is wrong again In 1990?

MS. SINCLAIR: We never said nothing is wrong.

We cane out here in 1964 and did a renoval accion. We did

an emergency accion by immediately taking airborne asbestos

from the public and covering it over, Then right after that

we began our feasibility study. We never said there was

nothing wrong. It was put on the Superfund. We didn't have

the Superfund Bill until 1982.

MR. HAYEN; How long are we going to be continu-

ing with this. Is this going to keep going on?

MS. SINCLAIR; It's a permanent solution.

MR. HAYEN: This is a permanent solution?

MS. SINCLAIR; Yea.

MR. HAYEN: This Is It? This is the end of the

rainbow?

MR. MOLHOLT: You're nischaracterizing that the

J

4R500055

U tht page Kilned In this inane, it not at reada6,le,j>r. legible,as slabel, -ct it due to substandard color or condition oi tht original page.

Page 54: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I

-

iij3|i\

i2

3

4

S

6

7

a9

10

11• 12

13

14

IS

18

17

IB

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

47

risk has gotten great and Che risk has gotten smaller and

Che risk has gotten great. It didn't occur Chat way. What

occurres Is we've gotten more and more Information in chac

allows us co understand exactly what is happening at the

site, We didn't understand those early airborne samples,

What we were detecting waa asbestos coning from Ambler homes,

not asbestos from the pile, We misunderstood the entire

characterization of it until we cook borings from the pile

and air samples from the pile racher than ambient air from

downcown Ambler,

MR. HAYEN; When dire comes back off chat pile

from a natural disaster or whatever, cones back off that

mountain, the air — it's back in the air and we start all

over again from ground zero? Ia that what we're supposed

to do and possibly do and like George said go through the

Ambler mountains and everything?

MR. MOLHOLT: It's going to get better. It's

going to have a cap on it. It's going to be a much better

mountain.MR, HAYEN: What do you do with all the

houses that sit out there and have aabestoa siding on it and

everything else? Do we cover' then over with dire, or do we

get rid of It?

MP.i ' ABREU-CITRON: This', is the case with

asbestos in the ground, piled up.

AH500056

U tht. page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable or <elabel, it it due to substandard color or condition o? the

Page 55: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O••

1

--

)

IIi

t

|

")

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

19

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

48

MR. HAYEN: We know this problem.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: And it's covered up. It's

very different from asbestos in the home, Of course, you

can't cover up a home, There are programs for removal in

homes and schools. EPA has an asbestos program,

MR. HAYEN : What do you do wich those?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; Normal way. You come and

they cover the place with', a lining over' the building and

,'ith suits, they put it in special bags, double lined bags

with plastic and it is taken to an asbestos approved landfill

and burled. Exactly what is done in Ambler more or less,

being buried.

MR. HAYEN: So you haven't changed anything?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON : The nature of asbestos, it's

inert. It doesn't blodegrade. It stays there. It's a pro-

duct that comes fron the ground. It's a natural product.

It came from the ground. It doesn't blodegrade. It doesn't

leach. It sits there and we just can't, the vast alternative

and most feasible logically, it cane from the ground, put

it back and that's it.

MR. HAYEN: Until it wants to cone back up?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Until it cones up. But baaed

on what we've done here, we've done an investigation. We

came up with an alternative. If sonething like this should

happen, we don't have to go to the proceaa. We studied it.

It the page Kilned In this inautt it not at readable^or, legible^as.label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi the original page.

Page 56: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

--

i5

i3ji\

12

3

4

S

a7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

49cWe cover it.

MR. HAYEN; The problem I have is how many times

things get taken care of or don't get taken care of. They

mainly don't get taken care of, After you leave, we go

through this again and again and again.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: This is it.

MR. HAYEN: No, this is it now. But when it

comes back off and che earth changes again and we go through

the same process and all of a sudden we get complaints and

somebody goes out and checks it, we go through the sane pro-

cess.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: How do you imagine it cones

off? £

MR. HAYEN: Erosion.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: That ia part of the opeion,

maintenance, checking periodically,

MS. SINCLAIR: Operation and maintenance is part

of the Superfund alternative. And if che responsible party

doesn't take on the responsibility, EPA will, In nost cases

it's the responsibility of the state for operation and main-

tenance. They pay ten percent of all cleanups and nornal

Superfund needs kind of site where there is no responsible

party. In this particular case we, EPA, will be taking over

operation and maintenance unless we can work out some kind

of a situation like Hector said earlier, with the state to

AR50QQ58

H the. p&Qt itm&d in thi* <*ame I* not <u ^eadabte^o* /tfl-ib/e a4 -label, -it i* due. to Aubttandaxd c.otoi o* condition oi -the original page.

Page 57: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o2

3

4

S

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

20

21

22

23

24

50take over that project. But there is a provision for opera-

tion and maintenance at every Superfund site, We don't

leave the community and have no one checking it.

MR. HAYEN: For 30 years?

MS. SINCLAIR; We don't Just walk away and not

check it for 30 years.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: That is the law.

A VOICE: Back to what Mr, Saurman was saying,

I wouldn't want to live across the street from a barbed wire

fence with signs, And I think that we do have a vested

interest in the community and that is to get rid of the '

mountain, So we will have sone value to the property that

is down there. We can, it's easy for us up here to say that

kind of thing, put the fence up. We will cover it, but we

don't live across the street fron it. She does and that to

me would be annoying,

JOHN BEAN; With different signs all up and downthat fence.

If you say you are going to put a higher fence there

with barbed wire, why don't you put the fence back to the

end of the slope and let us have that piece of property that

we used to have.

If you're going to put the fence back near the alley-

way, it's going to be high with barbed wire. It's the sane

thing on the other side. Why can't we have that piece of

AR500059

t thpage Kilned in this trane Is not as -label, At Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original,page.!

Page 58: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

10

ii IB

1j 20

1 21

i a1 23

24

29

ground? We won't have chat fence in fronc of our house,

close as it is now.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: If there was a guarantee that

nooody would go on chac sice, if I had no fence at all, I

would do it. I can't guarantee it with the fence there now,

As you know, I've seen it myself, I've seen washing machines

and I've seen people go there.

MR, BEAN: Yes, chat is back where you don't have

a fence, It's a piece of fence there,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: They climb the fence.

MR. BEAN: You never put a fence there befora.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: The fence was never put in

totally. '

MR. MOLHOLT: Walt until we have a specific

question.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: We looked at opening Che

playground but we felt again if we do move it back with the

eight foot fence, children, there ia a potential that they

might get through aa children always do. It's cloaer.MR. BEAN: They are not doing 1C now,

A VOICE: That ia a maintenance problen then,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Would you feel confortable

with it?

MR. BEAN: Yes, with the fence in the back at

the slope.D

AR500Q60

It the page Kilned In this <*«»« <•* not as *eada«e.,or legible as,,thls-label, it Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 59: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

1

--

ii3|i\

r

t2

3

4

S

6

7

a9

to11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

52

A VOICE: And if they do cut holes in it, you

fix it, You said you would fix it for 30 years.

MR. ABRRU-CINTRON: We can look at it.

MR, MOLHOLT: It's a very good point,

MR. BEAN; The children are not playing on that

part' of the ground now because the fence is near the

street,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON : I understand your fear.

MR. BEAN: I don't care for that fence there

with a yellow sign here and a yellow sign there and here.

A VOICE; What is a sign? If it's an eight year

old kid or a six year old kid or a five year old kid, they

probably can't even read any of che words. It's nothing

going to scop then. If sonebody wants to throw garbage in

there, do you really think a sign is going to stop thorn?

MR, BEAN; That is what we are getting now,

garbage, trash,

A VOICE: But I don't think a sign is ;|0tng to

stop it.

Those kinds of people are going to throw crash In

there if they want to throw trash.MR, BEAN; That's true.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; For cases like that it's ,

job for connunity people to watch people moving by and tak: ng

license plates.

o r

AfiSOGOG

•'•• It the page Kilned In this inane, it not as readable ..or legible, as. this > •'-!label, It Is due to suf>itanda/td aof.on on condition ot the original page. I

'"'• '' . '! '•' I

Page 60: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I

-

j1I3|j

!

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

to11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

4MR. BEAN: How many people from Locust Street

is here? One. And that's me because I do care, I live

right across from that playground, And I would love to see

that fence moved back at the end of that slope,

MR, MOLHOLT: Put your comments in writing and

get it to us by June 29th.

MR. BEAN: I called you, I call Nanci all

the cime,

MS, SINCLAIR: What you are bringing up is a

valid point. It's a good point. As you know we have to have

a fence up, Anyone who knows about hazardous waste sitea,

knows that one of the lawa under Superfund is chac we have

co keep it somehow designated that there is a problem here.

We just cannot put a fence up, especially if there's lots of

children. I know you are worried about the children who

live on Locust Street. You don't want then clinbing all over

the landfill or the pile and you don't want then digging

into it. You are not concerned if there ia a fence, and you

are a resident acroas the street, You would like to see the

fence backed up. Hector and I will do what we can to speak

to our superiors, Bruce will go with us to back us up. We

want to see the fence put way back, but atill you agree the

necessity of the fence exists.

MR. BEAN: You don't have a reading there.

That's why.

•''

0

o

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable..or legible, as this •label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 61: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

1

--

IIi3

!i\

)

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

18

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

54

MS. SINCLAIR; None of us in this room put this

Superfund site in che town of Ambler. It was there. The

best we can do is work wich what we have, with the technology

we have, and the laws chat we have, and the money that we

have co cake r.are of Ic. And what we are doing, what we are

proposing is the best alcernacive to keep the children from

being exposed to any kind of a hazard, And what you are

suggesting, backing up Che fence, is noc something we can't

look at. iphac is something chac is reaaonable,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Ic's proposed which is why

we are here.

MS. SINCLAIR: Please send us your comnent in

writing.

A VOICE: Instead of worrying about 30 years of

maintenance, why don't we cut the years down and remove ic

in seven or ten or 12 yeara. Why do you want to worry

about 30 years of maintenance? Why does chat neighborhood

have to go through all this stuff about fences and signs?

MR. MOLHOLT: It's $265 million dollars.

A VOICE: I want this stuff renoved.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I don't know if you saw the

law. There ia parts why we thought aboue this option.

There were other things, just the aspect of digging into the

piles exposes locals to threats immediately even though long

tern it would be gone, I didn't feel comfortable knowing

AR50COG3

i7"the page Kilned In this inant it not at readable .or, legible, as. this«-label, it it due. to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht oniginal page.

Page 62: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

--

IIiiirit\

i2

3

4

&

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

29

(]

5 S rthere would be a backhoe with a tractor digging into chis

pile,

A VOICE: I do respect your opinions, I also

heard, this is the first I heard a debate on this, I also

heard from the other side of the room a gentleman with

another opinion who saya maybe vitrification can work. And

I think it should be explored.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It has been explored.

And in detail.

A VOICE: With this gentleman?

MR. MOLHOLT: This is your first time but we have

been looking at it for a number of years.

MS. SINCLAIR: Again -- £

(Simultaneous questions and conversation —

not reportable.)

MR. MOLHOLT: It has been looked at.

A VOICE: Where is the closest site that aabeatos

is deposiced ac now? You said that buildings in this area

are cleaning up their buildings. I know of buildings that

have been cleaned up in the area. Where ia the nearest one

to this borough?1

MS. SINCLAIR: Where ia what? '

A VOICE: Where is the closest site that haa been

designated as an asbestos site where ic can be deposiced and

buried?

}

' ... , .,, , • •— ' ---——— — •"•war• • . • • • - • < ' -• ,» - ' . . ' ' ••'*••'" MgiW.1*''-''* *•"•" '-1.-V--- --^*fi*.-*i'7, '

It the page Kilned In this inamt it not at readabl.e ..or. legible as. thls^---label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 63: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

!

--

i

I3id!

t2

3

4

S

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

1B

20

21

22

23

24

25

56

MR. MOLHOLT: He is asking from the Philadelphia

area. The clean up of a building for asbestos, where do

they take the bags, what landfill.

\ MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It's in the report. They

mention three landfills that accept asbestos.

MR. MOLHOLT: Ic has Co be a designated sice.

A VOICE: That is what I am asking. I'd like

to know where the closest one is, The reason I ask that is

because with some quick calculations there is roughly 6400

truckloads of soil, and that becomes a simple mathematics.

If you run ten trucks a day, it is only going to take you

so long to move that pile and based on the technology that

we have now, if you're watering during that excavation pro-

cess where is it going to go? It's not going to go in the

air. You do it while it rains. You do it with a sprinkler

system over it to contain the process. I mean these are

simple principles. I wouldn't want to build my house there;

would you?

Now that is contained is it safe?

MR. MOLHOLT: I would build my house there.

A VOICE: Nobody I think in this borough wants

those piles there. They need1 to be moved. •

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: There is Grand Central

Landfill in Plainfleld Township in North Hampton

County, Pennsylvania. It has a capacity of 840,000 cubic

AR5CQQ65

label, K9L ir«o*!!BL£iiii ^

Page 64: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

57

yards is maximum,

There is another one in Pottstown. This is twoir.UHon

cubic yards is maximum, They get their maximum and it

closes, Another one is in Taylor Borough, 100 miles from

Ambler. Pottscown is —

Grand Central and North Hampton, Potcscown and one in

Taylor Borough. Those are the closest ones.

A VOICE: We are looking at a realistic amount

of miles as far as turn around and trucking.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Turning trucks and driving.

A VOICE: Just the actual cost, I don't

understand the direct relationship of 260 million dollars.

If you figure out the cost to a truck rental for a day —

MR. MOLHOLT: Where did you gee the estimace of

che number of truckloads?

A VOICE: That's very simple, sir. I am using

your figures, 1.26 million cubic yards.

MR. MOLHOLT: That is 1,60 tons.

A VOICE: No, it's not. It's nowhere near that,

When you calculate, say an average triaxle uses about nine

to ten yarda, okay?

MR, MOLHOLT: How many tona?

A VOICE: Roughly 22, give or take. It's sinple

math.

MR. MOLHOLT: You said 6400 tons. rAR5D0066

. It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable ..or. leglble.as s---label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 65: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

•n

1

-

5!I3ji!

j • .

)

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

taIB

20

21

22

23

24

25

58A VOICE: Roughly 6400 truckloads, averaging 22 cons

per cruck.

MR. MOLHOLT; This is too complicated for me,

Maybe you should submit that in writing also chat we will

consider before we make a final determination. If the mathe-

matics are correct and Chac looks like a cost effective

option and the landfill option is there, we have to consider

it.

I am not trying to put you off. I am saying hey, may-

be you got something,

MR. HAYEN: Didn't you say earlier that you

couldn't move it from the site. Wasn't that the new law

coming out?

MS, SINCLAIR: Under the Superfund amendment

Beauthorizatlon Act of 1986, part of the law says that we

have what is known as a land ban that is in effect, meaning

that no Superfund sice can Just pick up hazardous waste and

bring ic to another site to bury it,

MR. HAYEN: So all that doesn't matter anyway.

MS. SINCLAIR; Under the law we can't do that.

The land ban is in effect up until Novenber of '88. As of

Novenber of '88 we can no loriger do that,

MR. HAYEN: So if that ia true, you have to

scare looking into other methods fron the housing and the

schools and everything else.

AR5Q0067

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readabl*..or legible, as thls>;label, It Is due to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht oniginal page.

Page 66: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

I

-

11

i3I8i

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

- 1ly"**MS. SINCLAIR: You are talking about a different

issue.

MR, HAYEN: I am asking because you are going

to have some kind of a company that is going to have to

be created to get rid of the product in the first place,

One way or the other down the line you are going to have to

do that.

So spend your money on something that you can use now,

MS, SINCLAIR: Sir, you are confusing the whole

issue here because this site that we are talking about is

only in a Superfund site and the kind of waste that we are

talking about is a lot different than what we find in the

schools and old buildings. The schools and old buildings /

and pipes and all that are pure asbestos. And what we are

talking about here is a mixture. Aa Bruce explained and aa

Hector explained, and what we are doing for Superfund sites

and not for schools and for buildings, is looking at alctr-

native technology to take care of all the sites,

We have a whole complete program, called a site inno-

vative technology program. Innovative technology are being

demonstrated across the country for disposal purposes. One

is real close by in King of Prussia called Terravac (phonetic

spelling) and what we're doing is we went fron should we

excavate this landfill that has a lot of hazardous waate in

it and bring it, truck it through your neighborhood. Truck

D

j

AR5GOQ68

It,<he page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable,.?*, legible,.«s tnlslabel, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the orlgl«al page.,

Page 67: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o2

3

4

S

6

i 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

. 17

I la

j

j 20

1 21

i 22

1 23

24

25

J

60

a hundred trucks a week or whatever, through — 30 trucks

a day, Put it that way, through the neighborhood to truck

this hazardous waste out to the main roads and turnpike,

Or should we try what is known as Terravac which is more

feasible because it actually got the volatile or organics

out of the soil, And the whole community including local

officials are more in favor of seeing that Terravac used on-

site because it waa feasible alternative to be used and part

of that site program, and it was very cost effective. Aa

opposed to having truckloads of contaninated soil going

through the neighborhood.

MR. HAYEN: Why are you going through that truck-

loads if you have a company that sits on the site and every-

thing is there.

MS. SINCLAIR: That is a whole different issue.

MR. HAYEN: Everything is a different issue.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It's a breakdown for vitrifix

and there is a breakdown for transportation.

MR. HAYEN: There is a breakdown for everything.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It has to be. We have to

specifically detail everything, We don't want to brush off

vitrifix because of coat which could have been quite simple.

We could have said it's too expensive. We can't do it and

never looked at it. Vitrifix have not even looked at the

other two landfills in New Hampshire and Illinois.

' AR500Q69.It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable ..or. legible, as .label, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 68: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

iii3III

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

to11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

•JWe felt due to the interest of the borough, and due to the

Interest from the people in the town, we should look into

vitrification. Is this feasible, knowing it might be

expensive. We said let's look at this, Let's look at it.

We broke it down, the costs and we looked at that. As I

said, the alternatives. We looked at the costs. We looked

at the health benefits or risks that might be caused by the

alternatives. Technical feasibility of doing it. The

regulations we might need or regulations and laws that might

apply to this method. It was that Chat we based our deci-

sion on and vitrifix was looked at,

Taking it off site waa also shunned upon aa Nanci said.

It creates another problem. That kind of nade it — also (~

under the land ban, trying to avoid things like people

taking hazardoua waste and shifting it around like a chess

piece. We don't want to do that. YOu can do many things

wich hazardous chemicals. Asbescos in icself is jusc like

he says, a very inere object. It doesn't leach. It does

nothing. The only hazard is breathing it. It hasn't been

proven that drinking it can cause cancer. It's been under

study and looked at. But the actual hazard is breathing it

and covering the piles or basically burying' asbestos has

been found to be the obvious solution because you are elimi-

nating the major problem, which is breathing it. As long

as you don't breathe it, you're fine. It can stay in the

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable..or, Iegl6£e,aslabel, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 69: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

•D

o

2

3

4

S

6

a9

10

1112

IS

16

18

20

23

ground.

62

MR. HAYEN; I would like to go on record that

I would like to see it removed. Not the other alternatives,

GEORGE BENIGNO: Lifelong resident of Ambler and

a borough official.

I have several quesclons. I have been dealing wich

che borough scaff when chis problem first cane up, When

EPA first came ouc Co the site because che site was on an

old list of hazardous materials site, and we did your initial

air samples and your wipe-downs, how much asbestos did you

find?

find?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: What date?

MR. BENIGNO: How many fibers did you actually

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: What time?

MR. BENIGNO: Around '83 when you cane and said

you had to close the playground down immediately.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Actual nunber?

MR. BENIGNO; Yea.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; I have to look around. There

was percentages and actual account.

swlngset.

MR. BEAN: There 'is about Cwo percent on the

MR. UENIGNO: Ac Chat point became a crisis?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: The number exceeded the

A.R50007I" """""' •"S-Atj.i. v..,. .

• ' ',.,*•,',] l"f '• • ' .

It the page Kilned In this t*«ne Is not as readable.or .,„„,_„,,,_.„. _,.,.....label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal page.

i t

Page 70: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

-

2ii3|iI

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

It

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

63 -sOrequired amount.

MR. BENIGNO; And decided you would cover 1C and

went through the whole process,

MR. MOLHOLT : Reinvestigation of those samples

has caused some of the techniques used at that time in

question. It's not proper forum to do Ic here, Lee me scace

Co do ic chere are three different ways of dececcing asbestos

some of which are quick, which was needed at that time, but

dirty. That Is they do not distinguish asbestos fibers fron

other macerials in che dust. That two percent figure was

probably quite on the high side.

I want to say Chac for che record.

MR. BENIGNO: Okay. I chink the question becomes

if you live In an autonated, complex society asbestos is

found everywhere. I've talked to friends that tell me that

work in the same fields that you people work at, that if you

set up an air sampling machine in Center City Philadelphia,

ac Broad and Vine, you will pick up enough asbestos Chac you

would literally declare Chat intersection a hazardous materla:

site. Because it Is juat that much airborne asbestos fron

vehicles constantly braking and novlng. It la a busy inter-

section. Any busy intersection you'll find it,

I think why we are a little concerned is sure, previous

staff nenbers here or previous borough manager heard about

this procesa, read about it, and connected us with Dr,

0

"j

AR50G072

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable .or legible,as. this .':"label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal page.

Page 71: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

€> •

u

2

3

4

S

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

20

22

23

24

25

64

Roberts. Yes, it'a a legitimate point. Certainly Dr. Robert

Is a businessman, He wanes to push his process in the United

States. He has somewhat of a vested interest. I don't think

there is anything wrong with capitalism. That is the name

of the game.

I think what concerns us here in Ambler we were pro-

mised religiously that there would be a thorough indepth,

comprehensive gathering, meeting with Dr. Roberta and his

staff and his vested interest, and your neutral consultant,

Now we are hearing that it was a half hour conversation.

And we are hearing hin say I think it might cost me if I

build the big plant which could be taken away in four to five

years. Ten to fifteen million dollars, and you people are

saying according to our consultant he figured the plan some-

where around 150 million dollars, I an not saying you people

are wrong. I am not saying Dr. Roberts is wrong.

Can you understand why there is sone doubt anong us?

MR. MOLHOLT: Can you understand we can't make

those decisions tonight, and that if Dr, Roberta wants to

put in his biased proposal for the record before June 29,

there ia no problen with us looking at that with the help

of our consultant to see if these are accurate and agreeable.

MR. BENIGNO: Our concern is, and I'n speaking,

I'm sort of with the group, I think too often the way we

approach nasty problems in the American society ia lee's

AR500Q73

*T *•* not *• - g^.t, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 72: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

8

| 7

a9

10

1112

13

14

15

16

i 17i ">j3 »

!] 22

1 23

24

25

65

take che quick, cheap money solution, resolve it for now,

and don't worry about the next generation or two generations

down the road, I mean we could use the same approach in our

managr.ng of our municipal affairs. We got a nice major pot-

hole developing on a bridge. So we put a little coal patch

and come back two months later, put a bigger coal patch.

Sooner or later we have a problem, Why does American have

infrastructure problems? Because we have been doing that

for 40 years,

Now, I realize you people are responsible to do it

cost effectively. I have to say when I see what you are say-

ing, and I haven't read all the technical stuff and I will

be the first person to tell you that. I know this gentlenan /

just vaguely. We have had maybe two words between us. Ic

sounds Co me just as a dumb laynan standing here with the

rest of these dumb laymen, that maybe that aspect of your

study is a bit fraud, I am a little concerned that when they

looked at the third phase chac, if che only input they got

from Dr. Roberta was a half hour fron his assistant on the

telephone, I an not sure really vitrification got a fair

hearing from your consultant. Maybe we, you know we work

In municipal affairs, You can telegraph to1 your consultant

sort of what you would like your result to be, If you know

what I mean. You can give general subtle hints of what we

think we are going to end up here and that Is what the anawar

-h

J

AR50007l|i

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable .on legible as slabel, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht oniginal p«ge.'

Page 73: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

0 12

3

4

S

6

1 1

8

9

toIt

12

13

14

16

16

\\ «

Ii 201 21

j 22

124

25

;

66is.

I know there were resistance at the other two sites

of vitrification. We were told EPA had approved che site

I 'thought in West Virginia for a pilot test, vitrification

on asbestos or some other similar product. Do you know any-

thing about that? .

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Not a site. I went to it.

It wasn't a site, They basically took a glass manufactur-

ing facility and they borrowed their furnace for a week or

something, and they created a pilot study and brought in bags

of pure asbestos fron wherever. They took it through the

glass and washed it and so forth at the process, It wasn't

a site, It was basically juat a glasa production plant lent

then the facility for a week so they could bring in people

to look at it.

MR. ROBERTS: Could I explain that just for the

record?

We did a demonstration of the process, and you are

quite right, it was at an existing glass works. We actually

had to especially rebuild the equipnent. We bought it fron

the glaaaworka. We had to especially rebuild it.

It's a nlsnoner to say 'asbestos coming fron normal

factory work is pure asbestos. The average ia anywhere fron15 to 25 percent asbestos. The rest is made up usual detrac-

tivea which comes with it, the brick, plaster, cement, ao on.

Afi50Q075

It the page Kilned In this inamt it not at readablej»r. legible, as,label, It Is due to tubttandand colon on condition oi the original page.

Page 74: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

22

23

24

29

67

It was that that we tested that.

I was attempting to stay quiet for the rest of Che

meeting, But to make a formal written presentation to you,

I would also like to have che opportunity to have a meeting

co discuss the thing in more detail, At this moment I have

no idea whether the.vitrifix program Is economical in this

instance or not. I do know that I put a loc of work in

chinking abouc ic, and I don't think I've had quite the oppor

tunity that I had hoped I would have in contributing to the

report that you presented. And I'm sure between us we can

put that right.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Sure.

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

tt

12

13 MR, BENIGNO; The only thing I'n .laying is we

H have a problem. And if all we do is — it would be fine if

IS you could say to me if we cover it with three feet of dirt

16 and we regrassify it and we don't have to put up any fences

17 and any signs for all intents and purposes, any person who

IB drives through Ambler would say well it's a nice town. I

IB wonder why this outcropping of the 50 foot mountains here

20 in Ambler. You know, you put that fence up, barbed wire

21 on top of it and a big yellow sign and I'n the guy that in

13 yeara I have been with the borough, I get chose phone

calls, I get then regularly. I get three a week. And

people get the noat wierd ideas because they caught something

out of Philadelphia Inquirer or the New York Tines or this

91R500076

/* B! *" ihi* i*Mt iA not M Mtdabtf. on legible.a*label, it is due to substandard colon en condition oi the original

Page 75: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

1

--

si3\i\

)

t2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

to11

12

13

14

19

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

68paper and that paper and you know, they think people are

literally dying in this community from this pile, And I sit

down and explain to them, no, it's neutralized. No, they

didn't find any serious amounts of asbestos fiber off-site.

They found it on the playground which is right next to the

site. We don't show any in the general Philadelphia back-

ground areas any higher incidence of cancer or lung disease.

Yes, people in Ambler that come down sick are people that

work with ic all their life. Either mechanics, shipyard

workers, in the manufacturing of the plant. The general age

grouping of Ambler. I go through this because I'm constant-

ly dealing with it.

So I get a laynan'a feel, We would rather see you

spend another ten tines of what you are planning to spend

once and for all, Clear the 25 acres which I would like to

say is both in the Anbler Borough, Upper Dublin Township and

which is notched to a major preserve which would be a terri-

fic thing. Let's get rid of ehls scuff, You know, we

calked about you can't transport hazardous waate. We are

In a volunteer fire company. I an in a conaortlng loss con-

trol group. I'n the chairman of it. Do I know Sara? Oh,

do I know Sara. Sara ia a wonderful bill, > Quite frankly,

I wish they got nore inpue from Che laynen, fron Che fire-

fighera, fron the energency responders instead of I don't

know who put it into the bill. But some of the things ara

AR5Q0077

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable..or legible as thislabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi the original page.

Page 76: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 1

a9

10

1112

13

14

ts16

s 17-1 M

i IB3 20

S 21I3 22

!24

25

69

a little impractical. I would like co say Chat I really

chink before we push forward in spending five million dollar*

for three feet of dire, I would really like what we were

promised, the borough officials, three years ago, that vit-

rification would get a fair and honest hearing, So far,

fron what you people, from EPA are saying to me, and fron

what Dr. Roberts ia saying, and I agree with you. I under-

stand what Dr. Roberts is coming from and accept that, Hi

is trying to sell us something. That is the American process

But I don't, I really strongly don't feel that he got a fair

hearing because I know and maybe I shouldn't say this. May-

be you people will get mad at ne. I know with ny conversa-

tion with the borough manager, there were aone people ac :he

local EPA office that alnost were kicking and screaalng that

they don't want to look at vitrification because they said

we looked, at it In Rhode Island or somewhere, and it don't

«.work. *•

So there were some preconceived notions going into

this. So all I want to say is I think we would be happy if

you take the 25 acres and you completely clean then over the

next 15 years ao we can do something with the ground,

Instead of just covering then and then maybe the potential

to cone back in ten years. We got sediment. We got to do

sone other work with it or the fence is falling down. We

got to put in new fencing. And let's face it, whether you

U tht pagt Kilned In this {rame Is not as readable .or, legible as th&label, it it due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 77: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

<02

3

4

S

6

\3 »1 215 22

] 23

24

25

Vj

70like it or not, the grass has got to be cut every two weeks

for seven months a year and that isn't going to be cheap,

friends,

That is all I have to say.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I would like to answer in

terms of vitrifix. Or, Roberts is not the only patent on

this process. We not only talked to Dr. Roberts, we talked

to Matel Industries which also has a process similar to this.

I'n saying that the vitrifix process is noc solely

patented by Dr. Roberta. Matel Industries also has that

process and we have talked to them.

MR. HAYEN: Could you bring then here too?

A VOICE: A company from West Virginia that

called and are interested in the procesa also.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: In terms of what can be con-

sidered, a fair analysis of the procesa in terms of via that

half an hour, some conversations that lasted a half hour and

a conversation that lasted eight hours. I an not saying that

it waa just a half hour waa enough or not. I can honestly

say our contractors looked at all aspects. We got nunbers

fron Dr. Roberta, be it a half hour or whatever it waa, and

we got the necessary nunbers.' We don't need- ouch to nake

theae numbers out. We Just need to know how much cost per

ton, how much cost per hour.

Again, I say we talked with Matel and they gave us cer-

AR500G79

It tht pagt Kilned In this inamt Is not at ntadatitt,.j>n.,legible.as .label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 78: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 1

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

i1 18

fi 20

I 21

d 22

i24

29

71

tain estimates and got a general idea. We looked at it as "-

in depth as much as we could.

All you need to know is various, like I said tons per

i*our you have, how much does the process cost and how would

you go about doing it. I mean how would you dig into the

pile safely,

MR. HAYEN: Tunnel slurry it. It's like coal

mining. If he is right, and this is creating like sealing

it, and concreting it, if you cook aucomaced machinery and

tunnelled and you located your treatment facility, and if

you fill in the lagoon area, you could put that plant right

between it or you can put it in a location within a half

mile of it, If you tunnel and slurry it and a closed con- r~

veyor belt system, you could probably meet it. I don't know

what the coats would be. But everybody keeps talking about

bringing a big bulldozer and digging it up. I don't know.

I am not the expert. But there are ways to get the material

to the plant.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; Well there ia different

methods of doing that. Tunnel.

MR. HAYEN: Moat of the stuff got there by

slurry. It was watered on. " It wasn't haul-ed on.

MR. ABREU- CINTRON: The calciun carbonate

in there is over like 110. It's very very liquid. Not very

stable. I don't want to be around when you cut in through

\

.AR500Q80

It the page Kilned In this t*«ne Is not as readable..**, legible.as -label, It Is due to substandard color on condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 79: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

1

-

j!I3j4

i

)

i2

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

72

Che cap and that scuff oozes out. How would you be able co

control chac amount, You are calking thousands and thou-

sands of tons of scuff oozing out. Ic ia very, very liquid,

If you do a tunnel, I'm positive, I'm 100 percent sure, Che

Cunnel would fill itself up wich this white gook. If you

cue into it, I keep, using examples of chocolate covered

cherry, but that is all I can think of. You break it and

it would ooze out.

If you can guarantee me you can control it in a way

that it would not ooze into Locust Street and not ooze into

Wissahickon Creek, fine.

Let's say we cut into it. What would happen if thou-

sands of tons of this stuff starts oozing out of the pile.

How could we control it? If it burns, would the vacuuna

have the capacity to suck it in tine.

MR. HAYEN: The only difference is I adnit the

process looked like from your nunbers, extremely expensive.

But the difference is the end result. It's a safe product.

It is not a hazardous product.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: What if it is unsafe while

you'rt doing it? What if you are exposing the people?

MR. HAYEN: First of all, boch the seats and

che federal governnene are noc going Co permit the process

unless he has given you a method of air containment control.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Yeah. He has Co prove it

AR50008

It the page Kilned In this <ra«e Is not as ntadtbti^on, ,legl6<e»,«i.„„_-label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 80: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

-

i

!3j

i1

i2

3

_ 4

S

6

7

a9

10

1112

13

14

16

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

73is safe.

MR, HAYEN; We have another gentleman working

with a similar product, which is not your EPA problem, but

it is DER controlled, who is going to — what he tells us

— he ia going to excavate into that pile, mix it with

cement and turn it into building blocks,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: How big?

MR. HAYEN: I would say six, seven acres, George?

You can actually aee the pile behind you on that pic-

ture.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON : You can't compare 1.2

million tons to a couple thousand.

MR. HAYEN: This pile is 50 feet high. It's

two blocks long and at its widest point it is 70, 80 feet.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; The pile behind the McDonald

restaurant?

MR. HAYEN; Yes.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; That is nowhere near as big

as Locust,

MR. HAYEN: I agree. But still it's not —

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It's not 50 feet tall

either, I've aeen it, I've walked it. At the noat is

20, 25 feet, It's just the size is not conparative.

, Also in studying the piles and borings, we found

the existence of this very mushy white stuff. I don't know

O

O

AR50Q082

Page 81: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O 12

3

4

S

6

1 1

a9

10

it12

13

14

15

16

5 1?j 18

1j 20

} 21

i 22

!24

26

J

74

the consistency of this other stuff.

MR, HAYEN: Exact same material.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I don't know anything about

it, There has been studies.

MR. HAYEN: That is what I'm saying. This has

always been the question we've always asked is why waan'.t

that pile looked at, All we were told was that pile has

vegetation on it and we don't think it's a problem,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: At the time I think it was

fenced in and stuff like that, I guess the issue is if we

looked into vitrifix and I think we have.

We can gee more information. Dr. Roberts can send us

whatever he wants, better numbers. Fron the information we

got from other industries that also has this process, we

came up with these numbers in the report.

MS, SINCLAIR: Can we go on to another person's

question?

JOHN BEAN: I an John Bean and I an a military

retiree and I have seen the army engineers change faces of

nature. And we can't even change the face of one snail town.

Now you say you don't have a place to put this material,

You have one place, I don't know if you looked into it or

not. It is the ideal place for it, It's alnost deserted

right now and that is Centralia. Centralia is tht place when

you can dump that. It's burning underneath it.

AR500083

It tht pagt Kilned In this inant it not as readable..or. legible, as this- -.-"label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 82: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

--

I1

i3!8

|

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

»)MS. SINCLAIR: We can never cake hazardous waste'

from one site and bring it to a town where there is an under-

ground mine fire. What we could do is only dispose of it

in a landfill that is licensed to accept hazardous waste.

And like I said up until November ;S<3, that is our cutoff

date, we will no longer do chat, We couldn't ea!:e ic co

anocher Cown and dispose of ic because chey have chst. sore

of a problem. •;

MR. MOLHOLT: (NoC reporcable.)

MS. SINCLAIR: We can'c do anyching like ehae,

sir.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON : Why give che problen to some-

body else?

MR. BEAN: Vie town la being evacuated, Every-

body has moved out.

MS. SINCLAIR: The people agreed to it. There

are actually a lot of people still living there in Centralia.

Even if it was evacuated like Love Canal, we wouldn't take

hazardous fron one place co another, Love Canal ia a town

that was evacuated because of a problem.

This is nothing like Love Canal so I don't want any-

body to get the wrong idea.

MR. SABIA: I an a resident in the Borough and

I listened here for two hours. I have learned a little some-

thing. And I listen here now and I saw your four alterna-

^

•-*<.

0

AR5Q008if

It the page Kilned i« tkit inane, it not as readable..or. legible.as-label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page;

Page 83: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o2

3

4

S

6

1 *

a9

10

1112

C 1314

15

16

J1 IB

2 "3 w

! •i 22

| 23

24

26

O

76

tives, it seems a foregone conclusion that the first was out

of the question, The vitrifix, according to yet., is out of

che queation because it is too expensive. And your opening

rinark, you just verified it again when Mr, Bean spoke, we

couldn't take it up to Centralia and in deed, as of sometime

the end of this year, we are not allowed to take this mater-

ial off the site at all. It has sore of crimped my style

because I was under the impression this was a good move.

So in effect, all this beautiful work you have done

and I understand it is your job. This gentleman wants Co

sell his produce. You are all being paid by us taxpayers.

Ic's a foregone conclusion you are going Co do number four?

MR. MOLHOLT; No, it is not foregone.

MR. SABIA: You have 13 days now that people

have to get in this, It seens to me, it's pretty well-

addressed because you rulfiH out the other three. If that

is the case then we have to live with it I suppose.

Mr. Romano had some thoughts earlier about leveling

it off. Which makes some sense. If you are going to put,

is it four feet of fill over this?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Three feet.

MR. SABIA: Okay. You are going to put that

over it, and I think I heard soneone say that it would be

safe.

A VOICE: Hector, for the record, please describe

>.\ '-"--.....,-„..„'.. .-...;l .,.,.,..,.. .""; |!" '. ,'; .'.'!-. .•-. •;.

Jt^the page Kilned In ~hls inane, it not as readable or lealblelabel, it it due to tubttandand colon on condition oj the wJJ

Page 84: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 7

a9

10

11" • 12

13

14

19

16

iI 18

j

3 wi 21ad ' ' •*1 23

24

29

77

where the cover material will be on the piles?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: We are not covering the

whole pile, This here with the lines are the parts we will

cover with three feet, the top part. The area that is.

MR. SABIA: The area that is gray?

MS. SINCLAIR: This.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: This and these little pat-

ches, Everything else we won't touch. It is Just fine,

MR. SABIA: Then my question is, if indeed we

were to level it off to some degree, would you say it would

be safe to build on that ground?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON : No, it is not very stable.

MR. SABIA: I an not saying that you wouldn't /"

have to put certain foundations and then build.

Would it be safe or ia there always going to be fear

which seems to be prevalent throughout this group? That

asbestos can rise up through this and maybe, I'm thinking

that perhaps you could put housing for elderly or something

of that nature along with this park that has been suggested.

It seems it's a perfect place for that sort of thing

because it's right next to the creek which is a beautiful

creek and on the other side 'it's gane. You' have a train

station here. It would be a boon to Montgonery County, and

I think the entire area.

But if indeed it is not safe then you can't do that.

H tht page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable..or legible.as thisSlabel, it is due to substandard color or condition oi tht original page.

Page 85: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

2

3

4

7

10

11

12™

13

14

16

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

78

And what you are suggesting then is you are going to have

this mouiVM^ri that will be here forever, If chat's the case,

'I guess I will just have co live with it,

MR, MOLHOLT: We do have other sites remediated

to such a degree that they are stable, Not sites under

which there are drums or anything else. We do have sites

stabilized and now can be used for other purposes like parks

and like building and so on,

The major problem here is not the asbestos from the

standpoint of doing that. The major problem here is the

shakey yellow like condition of the majority of that pile

which would prohibit the building.

MR. SABIA: You could drive piles through it.

There are other neans of foundations through it to get down

through virgin soil, deep down to the rock, which is not

far below that,

MR. MOLHOLT: I don't think that anybody would

choose to drive through 30 feet of yellow like material,

MR. SABIA: Put that banner on it and it goes

down unteen feet sitting on it. You're going to make a lot

of noney.

MR. MOLHOLT; But you're.not talking about the

remediation of the site, You are talking the future develop-

ment of that site.

MR. SABIA: Okay. But it's all based on what

AR5QOOB7

Page 86: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

-

III3|!!

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

'

Che determination of this is and furthermore if you do what '-

was suggested by Mr, Romano and you used the word Gabion,

you didn't use that correctly, Because a little later on

you said concrete, A gabion is not concrete, It's a cage

filled with scone,

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: Eicher chac or rifraff.

MR, SABIA: You Indicated concrete as being a

retaining wall , Now which is it?

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: It's not final, I Just used

gabion and that term — gabion would sound beccer. We would

use whatever we feel —

(ConversaClons simultaneous — noc reporcable.)

MR. SABIA: If it's gabions you see the water (

or whatever would trickle ehrough ic. If you puc concrete

wall or whatever there, then you could level it off and have

a nice area.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Probably concrete. Probably

not gabion.

MR. SABIA: Even if you put the concrete where

the gabions are you have to disturb that area.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; You are talking about a pile.

You are not talking digging into the pile. .

MR, SABIA: You will disturb that arna.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: We have to.

MR. SABIA: But in effect, after two hours it

,

D

w

AR5G0088

It the page Kilned In this inant it not at readable._or legible alabel, it Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 87: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

Iij3|iI

U

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

1>'

12

13

14

ts16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

80

seems we are stuck with this lasc alternative.

I have one other question and if I'm long, please tell

me, But the other question I have is you did some remedial

work there and a contractor came in and put 12 inches of top

soil over that area.

My question is, was that a competitive bid or was —

how was that handled?

MS. SINCLAIR: That was done under the emergency

response which already has a national contractor at the time

it was OH Materials, and they were done under the emergency

response contracting system,

We have them available at all times for emergency

response and that's the group that cane out back in '84,

Now we have a lot of these mini contractors with the new

Supert'ound Law and we have a lot of other emergency response

contraccors who also bid on projects Che emergency projects,

And they were, they were always hired out of headquarters,

So our primary emergency response contractor was hired

through the Washington office.

MR, ROMANO: Can we have the councilman speak

first?

DON: I an the new borough nanager.

I want to go back to the long tern naintenance question

If I renenber correctly, the responsible party normally picks

up ehe long term naintenance cost. Since the responsible

AR500089

the page Kilned In this inant it not at readable j>n Iegi6le»«!i tkj i';.'

Page 88: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

-

Isj3iIi1

t2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

29

party of Nicolet or Turner is bankrupt and EPA and DER are

going Co enter in a contract to see chac Che grass is cut

and the law is maintained or gabions are going to be main-

tained.

MS, SINCLAIR: They make sure the fence isn't

destroyer, che cap. isn't destroyed. That is mainly what the

operation is going to take care of. We still have another

responsible party, We will be sending them

in the next week or two,

BOROUGH MANAGER; My point is that this kind of

goes back to what Representative Saurman was saying about

Che Anbler and che potential for growth. Let's say that

there was a potential for sale of that property, would the (

new buyer buy that responsibility and also buy the liability

of sonebody going over the fence even If the fence and signs

are there, and the potential lawsuit?

MS. SINCLAIR: Under Superfund, EPA does not

Indemnify anybody, Anyone who is the present owner of the

sice is also liable for the site.

Th« second thing which you said if chere is a new

owner. Whenever we have a Superfund site, even if it's in

the nidst of a sale, anyone who we consider' a past or pre-

sent owner, if they knowingly bought the site as being part

of a Superfund site, they are considered technically con-

sidered a potential responsible party. So therefore, they

1

*\

'

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not a4 readable.,or legible,as..thls-'label, it is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal page. ;

Page 89: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

r ;3

4

5

8

1 7

8

9

10

11

" ' 12

^ 13

14

18

16

iS i»i 1B3 20! 21i 22

1 23

24

29

O

82

receive a notice letter, They have to go through negotia-

tions with us, We sit down and work things out with us.

BOROUGH MANAGER: The responsibility from Super-

fund, EPA stop?

MS. SINCLAIR: No. It never stops.

BOROUGH MANAGER: It Is a cooperative maintenance

agreement with whoever the new owners will be?

MS. SINCLAIR; Yeah. We work that out with a

separate consent agreement, We have co work everyching ouc

with a separate agreement whenever a new responsible party

is naned.

But anyone either past or present owner, If a past

owner filed bankruptcy and is in bankruptcy, they are still

considered a potential responsible party even if we have to

join a long list of creditors and become 800, they eventually

have to come back to us too.

A VOICE: That doesn't cut the grass though.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: No. We wouldn't stop. All

through negotiations we maintain that.

MS. SINCLAIR: We continue maintenance.

A VOICE: What happens now?

A VOICE: How much does maintenance coat over

30 years?

MS. SINCLAIR: Ten percent of ehe project.

A VOICE: What is ten percent of the project?

SB50009

Page 90: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

Isj3i1\

,2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

83 L("

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: Half a million,

BOROUGH MANAGER: So essentially what you are

saying is anybody who wants to buy it is crazy,

MS, SINCLAIR: I didn't say that.

BOROUGH MANAGER: Basically we are stuck with

them che way they are, covered with and planted on.

MS, SINCLAIR: We are asking everybody to send

your comments in writing and hopefully we will send them

before the 29th, If Mr. Roberts will send us the proposal,

if he can Guarantee us that his alternative to remediate Che

sice won'c cost a hundred million dollars, then we can talk

with him and if it's a viable solution and if our toxicolo-

gist and our scientists agree it can be worked out, we will (

sit down and we are planning to accept, not accept, but

review any proposal he is going to sit down with us and talk

about.

Just as anybody's comments we are accepting them.

MR. ROMANO: I would like to havemy alternative

proposal put in also,

MS. SINCLAIR: Everybody right now is being

verbally given to the court reporter. However, you have to

write it, go through the litcle bit of the extra work or

whatever to write it and send it to Hector or myself,

A VOICE: May I say just one thing?

MS, SINCLAIR: Yea.

D

?AR5GOOS2

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at ntadabtt.jH.. legible, as •label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 91: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O••

1

--

Iii3|idi

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

84

A VOICE: Are you telling us no matter what che

Borough of Ambler chinks, you are going co be Che final

decision. We have co eat your final decision that is number

one?

MS. SINCLAIR; You don't have to pay for it.

A VOICE: I don't want to hear money.

MR. MOLHOLT: We are the final deciders.

A VOICE: I live with my children and so do those

people in this community. So I don't want to hear money.

MS, SINCLAIR; I thought that is what you meant.

A VOICE: I don't want to hear money. I just

want to know do the people of Ambler have to go with and

legally have to go with what you people decided to do with

these mountains right now?

MR. MOLHOLT: yes.

A VOICE: We have no other alternative litiga-

tion?

MR. MOLHOLT: You can sue the agency.

A VOICE: That is great for the lawyers, The

thing is that I'n telling you that I agree with Mr. Sabia

and I usually don't agree with Mr. Sabia that often. But

I agree with hin that sitting here for the last two hoursand after 15 ninutea when I heard you people speak in tht

beginning and I turned over to Mr. Decenbrino and said we

are going to eat these mountains. And that is what I ftsl,

, AR500093 '

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable ..or legible . . . .label, It Is due to substandard color or condition pt tht oniginal pagt,

Page 92: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

8

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

i '?

1 «

i 1(j 20

! 21

S1 22

I 23

24

25

85

You people have made your decision, I really feel that, '

And that is my feeling. I think some of you, You really

made your decision, I really don't think if I was a betting

man, I would bet right now you are going to cover chose

mountains, you are going to put the fence up, put the signs

up,

MS. SINCLAIR: If somebody can guarantee us that

we don'c have to pay 100 million to do something that is

still effective and also can be health effective and not

expose the community to any asbestos from the center of the

pile, then we have something to sit down and look at. Some-

thing that is technically feasible, Let Hector speak.

Everyone is speaking but Hector. ,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Our job, EPA, is to try to

find alternatives which are on the list, and address then

in the way we can avoid any sort of health threats to the

public and find a cost effective alternative, Cost is a part

of it too. Again, cost is not our prime factor, It is one

of many factors.

The main factor in Ambler is that it ia not causing

any health problems. That is our number one problem, to

make sure there are no health' threats caused by the site,

If there was, we would get it out of there. If -the" nunbers

had cone up the Ambler pile was causing some sort of emis-

sion problems with the Borough of Ambler, I would say get

(

")

\i tkt page Kilned In this Inane. Is not as readabl.e.,.0* legible, as.label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

1 "'

Page 93: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

••

1

•-

i

53ia

t

12

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

ts16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

86

ic out of here, I could not come here and say we got reading

all over the town and such and such amount, but we are going

to leave it here,

v We did the study and found no emissions, nothing was

coming from the pile, so we decided preliminary, that this

is all proposed as che process goes, we said chis seems to

be the best thing to do, We come to che public, The law

says we should do that and give them the opportunity to see

whether it is good or not,

The strange situation with Ambler is that as it

stands now, I keep saying, I repeat there is not a health

threat fron the pile.

MR. MOLHOLT: You may hear us aa saying that we

got our minds made up, We hear you saying don't worry about

the health threats, Take down the signs, Let our children

not know what is up on the pile and worry about property

values. We are worried about — we understand all those,

We can only work under our mandate from Congress on the basis

of health threats,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Property values do not go

into effect. Value or any sort of reasoning,

Aesthetics does not go into the' process of the

solution. Is it hurting people, it is a health threat? That

is the problem, If it's not then what is the problem.

A VOICE: It would be great instead of you don't

u

AR500095

fcf . in $** <<«ne is not as ,, .as.4label, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 94: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

--

iii3|

1

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

87

have to put signs up hazardous material dump. I mean the

problem with hazardous materials is you have 900 and some

identifiable hazardous materials. Some of them quite frankly

and we know this because we work with them as emergency

first responders, will kill you just like that. Asbestos

won't unless you inhale it and you have to inhale it most

likely over an extended period of cime, But still it is

lumped together as a hazardous material.

You put signs on the fences, federal wildlife preserve,

and I don't think anybody would argue with you. But as soon

as you put chat sign up that says it's a hazardous material,

dump, whether you like ic or not there is a bonus on Ambler.

You are celling us che risk is chat high. ,

MS. SINCLAIR: Ic could say no crespassing,

MR. MOLHOLT: I believe Chac Che wording of that

sign is something that is purely negotiable and I think you

raised a very good point. And I think all concerned people

who would like to insure the safety of their children but woulc

also like co not make chis an eyesore could not only talk

about the wording on that sign, but also the color of the

sign, everything, It should be sonething that will protect

public health, It does not have to say dump, It probably

could be worded strictly for asbestos not for hazardous

materials. It could be worked out. We need your input on

that. >

3

D

' fflRSCOQSS

It the page Kilned in this inane, it not at readaole..or legible,••a4 ihit i -label, it is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 95: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

\J

t2

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

i "1 "

Ii 20j1 21

4 .. 22

1 23

24

26

)

88

A VOICE: Let me go back Co what Mr, Romano said

about spreading ic out. As high as ic is right now and you

put a cap on it on che cop of Ic, with that height would

there still be erosion in time and if you knock half of it

off and flatten off wouldn't chac cue down erosion?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: With che cap on, based on

other things we find the drainage flows Co divert the runoff,

a concrete type chute.

Hopefully thac will address all erosion problems,

That is one of our big aspects of looking into ic, Try to

avoid erosion which seems to be the biggesc problem.

MR. ROMANO: There would be less erosion piled,

less high and flattened out?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I mean obviously shorter,

flatter, ic would be less erosion.

Again, you gee into che problem of cuteing into it and

getting into the material.

MR. MOLHOLT: It's not eroding now on the

hazard site so this could be maintaining itself.

A VOICE; Couldn't you do this, knock part of

that off and cap it with cenent and nake cenent roads up

there? Then you wouldn't have erosion,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: You nean cenent on the top?

A VOICE: Use it for a lookout mountain.

MR. SABIA: More erosion. A hard surface area.

It tht pagt Kilned In this inamt it not as readable, or legible, as -this- •-•label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt. ;

Page 96: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

89The water would runoff.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON! Grass and vegetation tend

Co move che runoff just minimizing erosion effecc, If you

have a flat surface, Another problem how thick would you

want to have ic wlch added pressure on top.

We would have to study this, I am sure if concrete

cap idea, and all those possible remedial alternatives, I

defer to what che gentleman said here that we study chese

four alternatives and we have not studied all of them.

A VOICE: Does the state have any position on

the matter?

A VOICE; I'll tell you what. At the present

time we are reviewing the document and we have not formally

concurred with the proposal. So we are reviewing it right

now, So we sit with the rest of you and we will submit our

comment before che 29th of June,

A VOICE; What is the process for existence?

A couple of individuals in the audience brought up some pro-

grams, viable remedial alternatives, and here we have 13 days

of public review period before the next phase is Instituted,

MS. SINCLAIR: You want to extend --

A VOICE: I an asking is there 'a possibility of

a nonth's extension?

c

MS. SINCLAIR: It's not usually a month,

A VOICE: Whatever extension period, so Dr,

IU tht pagt Kilned In this inant it not at readable_or. legible, as. «is*-label, It is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 97: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

"

Ii3 .,jiI

)

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

18

17

IB

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

90

Roberts could have a fairly lengthy meeting with you, Maybe

Mr. Romano would have time.

MS, SINCLAIR: He could meet with us before the

29th.

A VOICE; I don't understand.

MS. SINCLAIR: Could I answer his question,

please?

A VOICE: Walt a minute. You are sitting here

and saying you have been studying this for three years or

two years and now you've got all these questions and you

are going to settle this in 13 days.

MS. SINCLAIR: No. We put this in the paper

back on May 27th. It has actually been over 30 days and I

have gotten several calls from the reporter who told me not

only reporters, but residents who said they saw the ad in

the paper and they called about the meeting. So people have

seen it, I also announced it will be available for review

in more depth like che volumes that Hector has besides just

this proposed plan that have been reviewed by different

people who called us already.

So people have seen it, We are not making the deci-

sion in 30 days, We have been gathering this data as we

gather the data we also looked into alternatives. And we

listed these four alternacivea as mose prevalent

based on che daca Chat we received during the renedial

fiR50CQ99

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not as readable.,or. legible aslabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt

Page 98: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I

«•

i!i3

a5

1

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

„]investigation. So we still, as Hector said, are proposing

chis alternative. As far as your question is --

A VOICE: Well, my question is there have been

t lot of good ideas and we have 13 days to present these

good ideas, What I don't want to see is a bureaucratic door

shut. Somebody comes on the first of July and says I have

an excellent excellent concept. You people would say gee

ic was a good concept, Ic's a shame you dldn'c give it to

us yesterday.

MS, SINCLAIR; If you want a formal extension

it usually is not a month, but a week or cwo ac the moat.

And this one we wanted to hurry up and get the work started

on the site. So we would have liked to have gotten it not (

extended, che comment period. But if you people are really

interested in extending the comment period, Just send your

comments or that question to Hector or to me and we have to

put it in with the official record and show it to people who

are our superiors .

A VOICE: If I could get that in before the 29th?

MS, SINCLAIR: Yes. Get that letter in as

quickly aa you can. If we get one letter requesting an

extension it wouldn't be able to change the' whole process

as much as more, you know, as much as probably a group ofrequests.

MR. MOHOLT: The official letter from the borough

,

>J

O

ftoGGIQO

It the page Kilned In this <ran« is not as reada6.l*.,or egible,,as;thilabel, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page

Page 99: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

92

0

o

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

would that have an effect?

MS. SINCLAIR: Maybe an official letter to our

administrator, to Hector,

We do have a law that says we have to allow 21 days

for public comment and 30 days in the draft, We are going

•with the 30 days, ' If you want to extend it, chat is through

a letter to our regional administrator,

i. VOICE; What was your outside neutral consul-

tant?

MS, SINCLAIR: Wait a minute. Please one thing.

We did put the ad in on the 17th. We did get calls on it

already, We have the 30-day comment period. I would like

you to be accurate in your request stating we do have the

30-day comment period.

A VOICE: A thirty day comment period scheduled

now apparently ideas have been brought out — certain as-

pects of the information apparently has not been delved into

as carefully as possible from what I am hearing.

MS. SINCLAIR: Sone new ideas have come up from

Mr. Romano and from Mr. Roberts.

A VOICE; Are you waiting for the state report ?

MR. MOLHOLT: We' anticipate the' state report by

June 29th.

A VOICE: Yes. we will be definitely finished

by June 29th,

A R 5 0 0 I O Ift1**!.*'! ..—_-...

I< the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readaWe,j>r, legible,..* im .label, it Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page

Page 100: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

-

s1I3iI5

!

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

93

A VOICE; My only question was or maybe I am

wrong, Was your outside neutral consultant, was it a

requirement in the contract between EPA and him to have

held something like this much earlier on?

MS, SINCLAIR; Someching like what?

A VOICE: Like here tonight.

MS. SINCLAIR; Public meeting?

A VOICE: Yeah. It seems like it was done in

a vacuum,

MS, SINCLAIR: Nothing was done in a vacuum.

We put an ad which cost a considerable amount of money in

Che ad. And I received a considerable amount of calls.

A VOICE: What I an saying, wouldn't it have been

better if we had this meeting a year ago and talked to your,

consultant?

MS. SINCLAIR; Well —

A VOICE: He should have been taking what we

got here and looking at that and then putting it into his

report.

MS. SINCLAIR: He cane to our last meeting that

we had and looked at the vitrifix and we have all that docu-

mentation, not Just vitrifix; There waa another company we

spoke with.

We did everything we could.

A VOICE; But the big criticism I have gotten

b

/rs

oAR5GGI02

H tht pagt Kilned In this inant it not a4 readable..or. legible, -label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 101: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

94

over the two year study is why wasn't the public given an

opportunity to talk to your consultant before che report was

typed up? And nobody can seem to give me an answer other

than well, the process isn't set up that way, Who can bet-

ter comment to him than the people who have to live with it?

MS. SINCLAIR: They didn't have anything to com-

ment on until the consultant had a report,

A VOICE: Does he gather facts?

MS. SINCLAIR: Right.

A VOICE; If he never talked to us how did he

gather those faces?

MS. SINCLAIR: Going on the site and collecting

samples, technical data is what we are basing this on. Now

we are asking for public comment. We can't change the way

the process works as far as that goes. We are asking for

public comment on our proposed alternative, We told you if

you want to extend the comnent period, give us an official

letcer co our regional adminiscracor for che excension. That

is something we can't handle from our level and our super-

visor can't handle that either. And number two, we are

asking for all of your comments and by the 29th, If that

is not a good enough date are you sure you 'want it extended?

A VOICE: I an not picking on you three guys.

The public,:, the perception amongst the public is that the

public, I mean you're public employees. You use public noney

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at ntadablt^on legible, as.. thls"i- -. .-llabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt. I

Page 102: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

ji3j

1

i2

3

4

S

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

95 cand hire a private consultant, okay, But the public itself

or any interested business person or Interested person with

a technical background was never given a chance co comment

co your consultant, So here we are, it's 11:59 and this

thing goes off at midnight, and now you are asking for us.

It's a little late in the process.

MR. MOLHOLT; This should be looked at as a

framework for discussion, And you should have as much time

to accumulate and discuss all of your public concerns as you

need, That is why we do have this facility for an exten-

sion, But the technical details chat went into chis cook

two years to put together. That is not the time to go out

and gather public opinion during that time. C

If 30 days isn't adequate, what we are trying to do

is, on the other side of the coin, I think there is a little

comment down here why we have taken three years already,

We are under the hip of Congress to get these chings'into

remedial accion as quickly as possible so that any hazard

that might occur in che future might be avoidable.

A VOICE: So what you are saying is nobody in

Che public mighe have access Co a technical point that

would have helped your technical consultant?

MR. MOLHOLT: There were, as we tried to indi-

cate earlier, a lot of negotiations going on with, . ,

(Conversation inaudible — not reportable.)

]AR500JQI*

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable.,or legible, aslabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 103: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

1

2

3

4

S

6

96Whether or not these technical solutions were

feasible and if so how much they would cost, These kinds

of negotiations went on,

i Consulting the public as to whether you would prefer

a fence in front of the playground or in back, those types

of things, chat is what we are here right now for, which the

fine tuning of various technical options, and we heard some

new technical options here which I think we're bound and

determined to look at and take seriously.

But again, that should all if it's possible fit into

the next month so that we can get on them with whichever

alternative is appropriate within a timely fashion.

I think you can understand that.

A VOICE: I understand what you are saying. I

am just saying —

MS. SINCLAIR: She has a question.

A VOICE; — it has been the biggest criticism,

We were promised we would have input,

MS. SINCLAIR; You do have input.

A VOICE: But input at the very end,

MS. SINCLAIR: Right. That is when we have an

alternative.

MR. MOLHOLT; Those docunents have been in your

local library for some time and I don't think you've read

then.

AR500105

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable,.or leglb/e..label, it it due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 104: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

2

3

4

S

6

8

9

10

It

- • 12

13

14

IS

16

i "i 18

j

j 20

1 21

8 22

1 23

24

25

, "Ml

- Lr*A VOICE: I don'c work 40 hours a week in EPA '

offices and read ic, '

MS, SINCLAIR; How can you comment if you don't

read it?

A VOICE; Do we have a copy of that here?

MS, SINCLAIR: It's in the Wissahickon Library,

They are open five hours a day, six days a week,

A VOICE: Well I have difficulty getting there

to spend the hours you need to read them. Ic seems that

another copy ought co be available for us.

MS, SINCLAIR: We can get a borough copy for you.

A VOICE: I thought we were promised a copy.

You are saying we didn't read it, but it's highly difficult

for nine or ten of us to get co che library,

MS. SINCLAIR: We are sending ic —

A VOICE; Do we favor —

MR. SABIA: I am inceresced and chis hasn't been

said before. I would like you Co ask how many people here

live oucside of the Borough of Ambler,

MS, SINCLAIR: Does anybody here?

How many people don'c live in Ambler?

MR. SABIA: I would be interested to know where

they reside if they are here for some other reason —

MS. SINCLAIR; This is a public meeting. It is

open to anyone.

Aft50OlOCo

0

,v,»

W

It the page Kilned In this t««ne.ls not as readablej»*. legible,,as.,label, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 105: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

e••

!

0

S!i3JI

ii3t

O

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

98MR, SABIA: What I am trying Co get ac is chis

asbestos which was floating around here when I first moved

into Ambler which has been the last ten, IS years, It was

quite prevalent when I moved here. When the winds blew,

they didn't jusc blow to Ambler. They blew to Whitpaln,

they blew co Whice Marsh, Upper Dublin and what I am getting

ac is chat, you know, there is no magic wand around here

Chat this is jusc Ambler's Borough jusc because these piles

are here, When I first moved here and what is here today

are two different things,

I understand your problem and all, but I was Just

wondering if anyone of our neighbors saw fit co come here

to see if Indeed they were in trouble. And apparently they

are noc because the most prestigious secondary school in

this area is they come out here and built right across the

road from it, So they apparently are not worrying about it.

MS. SINCLAIR; It's 9:30 now. I won't stay

here until midnight repeating. What I would like though is

just toroake some points here, that if you want your exten-

sion, like I said, I need an official letter to the regional

administrator, Janes M. S-E-I-F — and anyone else who has

sound technical comments or any comments, excuse me, any

comments at all regarding this Ambler Asbestos site, please

send Chen Co us. I feel Hector and Bruce and I answered all

of your questions as best we could just sitting here this

^500/07

as. , . . , , ( a s .label, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 106: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

-

1!IiiIi81

12

3

4

S

S

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

99nevening, And che next seep is to see how the decislonmaking

process actually works, If there is some reason for us to

sit down with Dr. Roberts, Hector will be on the phone with

him or our contractor will be on a three-way conversation

with them, and plan a meeting dace.

If Mr. Romano' has items chac he wants Co discuss with

Bruce or Hector, he is going to send all of his comments co

us in writing too. If some point he wants to come in and

meet with us, he can call us, Anything that was said tonight

is going to be repeated because obviously that is what is

going on for the lasc half an hour which if I can gee some

new comments from chose residents here, we would appreciate

it, If not, I would just say that we can adjourn this meet-

ing and then maybe —

A VOICE; My comments are first of all, can we

get a copy of the RFP from your consultant and the name of

the consultant? The reason for my asking that is I know

from the meeting before, there was a considerable amount of

money that was going to be put inco this whole study situa-

tion. I Chink from what I heard, five to ten tons a day is

the description of the equipmenc chac we were given two

years ago to put on the back 'of ehe tractor trailer Co go

co schools and places like chat as a mobile unit to take

asbestos away, And it sounds to me that the consultant, and

I think it should be on the record, that the consultant has

0

D

•It the page Kilned In this ane Is not as riadable..or, legible ns,thls-;--label. It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 107: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

O

12

3

4

S

6

I 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

i| 18

i lfli 20

1 21

i 22

1 23

24

25

100

not in face, goccen chose facts, Now you have agreed to

listen and I chink chat's great, I think that is wonderful

and I am sure that it will happen. I didn't particularly

care for the comment about the person with the vested inter-

est, I chink that when you calked abouc che Izuzu I would

say chac if someone were Co move a pile of scuff and you

were going to use a wheelbarrow ana ! came with a Izuzu,

you would probably want to talk about the guy with the vested

interest because it could be done better and less expensive.

That ia what I Chink you should be looking for,

I Chink your consultant somehow failed to get the in-

formation, and I think that there should be some explanation

as Co why Chat information waa so incomplete with regard to

one of only two options you have because you've already said

the 'first one to do nothing is not an option. And you've

already said that the law prohibits you removing it,

So you had two options that you could viably look ac,

and you've had all this time to do that and the one opclon

in my opinion is totally incomplete and inaccurate from Che

remarks Chac have been — and I am not blaming you people,

You paid taxpayers money. You paid the industrialise money.

The manufacturer's money, but you paid somebody's money to

get information that I feel is incomplete, inaccurace, and

shouldn'c really be looked ac from che standpoint of what

was done, And now I'm happy to hear you are going to listen

———————————————————— i - c ,-, f, 1 fl Q ——————

label, it it due to substandard color or condition o't thi* oniginafpajft

Page 108: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

ts16

! 17I I"

i 19

j 20

1i 22

j 23

24

25

101 1

Co some additional information. And I would hope chac che

fact that Dr, Roberts who was che one who came up with this

technology and who didn't come over to America from England

to sell this idea under che free enterprise system. He was

invited by the chen borough manager, who was looking for a

solution Co a problem chat has been here for 40 some years.

So I chink chat inference is incorrect, I think

that Dr, Roberts has a technology, he has the. knowledge and

I am happy you are going to listen to him,

The other part is I really chink chat che consultant

should be brought on che carpec and made co explain.

MS. SINCLAIR: I jusc have one comment to make

to you jusc so you know, I wane Co put this on the record,

Our consultant put cogecher chese remedial accion and

feasibility studies, It might be too time consuming for

people to Cake ic and read ie ac the building, But if you

read that in detail, you would see our consultant didn'c do

a job that wasn't complete. He did a job that we asked him

to do and he did look into every alternative that is listed

there,

Now wesay we will go further than what he has done

and meet with Dr. Roberts. That is the best we can offur

thin evening and after we see and review it —

A VOICE: My queseion was is the RFP available

aa well as Che consultant's name? Ic sounds Co me as

A R 5 0 0 I I O

It the page Kilned In this inane. Is not as readable,to*. legible.,a.label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

; . ' ' ' ' • ' I I

Page 109: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o2

3

4

S

6

I 7

8

9

10

11

-- . 12

13ois16

i! 18

i "j 20

•1 •8 22

j 23

24

0 "

102

though you are happy with the Information you got, and I do

not chink I am. And I don't know chat my Congressman is,,

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: The name is on the report.

A VOICE: Okay, fine. Ic would be nice Co know

what it was he was supposed to be finding out,

MR. MOLHOLT; We should send, in view of the

recommendations for how to conduce a remedial investigation

feasibiliey study, and you can see in there what che require-

ments are for any Superfund sice.

A VOICE: And we can gee a copy of that fron. EPA?

A VOICE: Do you communicate with Mr. Self?

MS, SINCLAIR; Yes.

A VOICE: Well ic seems chac Chis excension

should really come as a matter of course. I mean Mr. Sage

suggested we have 13 days and you say you have 30. Thirty

is nothing. You come in say this is che largesc undertaking

you have ever done,

MS, SINCLAIR; No. This is not che largesc,

A VOICE: If I can finish my commenc? Ic is

public discourse like chis thac breeds new ideas not people

individually trotting down Co che library stairs eo look at

three volumes like that, To say they have been there for

people to look ac isn't fair, Really 1C has been only 13

days and you say 1C is che biggest undercaklng ever when

it's really only been 13 days. So chis excension, it seems

f l R S O O i l

It the page KUned In this t*«ne Is not as readable*, legible as,label, it it due to substandard color or condition ot the original page:

Page 110: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

5

6

to me should be a matter of course,

103

O

meeting,

MS. SINCLAIR: Thirteen days since che public

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: Unfortunately things turn

out this way, The documents are there and you don't have

to submit all your comments. Ic's food for thought you kno1

But it's been there,

A VOICE: We are sorry to say that we do have

other jobs, We are not, I'm just —

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I have other sites.

A VOICE: Fine. I cannot take off from work

and spend for me to read that, maybe five or six days. I

cannoc spend that time. I need more cime chan 13 days from

this meecing Co absorb chac kind of information.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Why does ic stare from chis

meecing? Why didn't it start the second day ic was in the

repository?

A VOICE: I can't sit in ehe library, sir, chac

is closed co read that report, If you were chat Interested

for the borough officials co have ic, there could have been

a copy sent to the borough,

.MR. HAYEN: If you are going to do this, why are

you in such a big push? What is 13 days or what is 20 days?

MR. MOLHOLT; There is somebody at the other end

saying why are you taking three years,

O

0

AR500II2

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not as readable .or legible, as, .label, It Is due to substandard color or condition o.t the original page. .

Page 111: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o••

t

.-

p5S

i3jI8

1

O

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

104

MR. HAYEN: No, no, no. We are asking you in

this town,

MR. MOLHOLT: Every community we face we have

somebody standing over us with a whip saying gee ic done as

quickly as possible, Why have you only cleaned up eight

bi.es in five years, We hear chac all the time.

MR, HAYEN; Do ic right, This clme do it right.

MR. MOLHOLT; We hear pressure that we are

Caking Coo long,

MR. HAYEN: You are doing It right. I don't care

how long it takes, You are doing it half ass, It's going

to end up that way,

MS, SINCLAIR: We are not going Co argue over

our contract.

ROBERT SAURMAN: On council. A lot of this is

repeating the same things and I know ic gets very tiring.

But for us as residents chis is where we live. This is our

life in Ambler, I have lived my whole live thus far and

hopefully I will have a number of more years in Ambler.

Unfortunately when I an 90 years old there will be asbestos

piles over there. Understandably you set up a 30-day period

for us to review the material, You are giving us 30 days

to respond to something that will affect us 100 years from

now. Now • we are just having our Centennial now, On our

Bicentennial now you are saying that people will be walking

ARSOOIVI3

It,<fc« page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable ...or. legible as.thiisiSlllabel, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original pagei'

Page 112: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

I

--

Isi3Ji81I

. — .w;*"i ,.:..•-

12

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

105

Butler Avenue past the asbestos piles Chac are scill there.

If there is an alternacive maybe ic will cose more, If we

had an alcernacive chen maybe we should put a little invest-

ment into chat.

I understand we have differences of prices and that

should be worked out, I Chink you have to look ac ocher

fringe benefits as well, For instance, if ic were an iso-

lated problem, fine, cover ic and ic is done. But you have

an asbestos mountain and you have ic all over the country.

Ic has Co be done. When you Cake on a job of Chis size, a

lot of problems Chat are going to come up, A lot of new

solutions generated, New solutions used in the next project

and che nexc project, You don't improve the technology un-

less you go out and test new things and try new things and

cake on new problems.

And something you have to consider is the benefits of

future technology of doing chis Job is going Co help, You

can't put a dollar figure on chac, But 50 years from now

when we finally are getting rid of all chis asbestos in this

country, they can look back and say a lot of whac they

learned at Ambler ...

MR. MOLHOLT: If I can make a proposal. Ic's

a strange thing for me Co do in a meecins like chis. If Ii

can make a proposal since chere are so many people on council

chac have an inceresc in chis from a long term perspective,

A R 5 Q O I U•••"•"••" " ......... .. ...,., ,.,,-...,.. ,.,.!,,>•„„ ...I.MMMU,

Ittthe page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable j>r. legible as'thislabel, it Is due to substandard color or condition ot the oniginal pagt.

Page 113: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

O

I

--

iiI3]

d .. i!1 :( |'

-1 .

t2

3

4

S

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

106

and I can certainly understand it, I am the same way, Any

problem that happens in my community which is in Montgomery

County up che road, I propose, I don'c know if there is

Vider your Jurisdiction as council, chac you sec aside

somebody's time for the next couple of weeks to spend half

of their time in the library going over this tooth and nail

and acting as a filter for all of your comments and you chen

do your homework, I think you'll gee chat extension. I

don't see why in the world you can't have a month to do this

and put iccogecher in a package thac is going to be for the

community. This is che best community service you can do,

Put ic together with somebody's technical confidence. I

hope you get in there and actually look ac chis from che

borough's point and give us comments back chae are filtered

through thac.

ROBERT SAURMAN: Thac is a fine suggescion. All

of us have either individual jobs and other individual things

we have Co do,

MR. MOLHOLT: If chis is a real high prioriCy

MR. SAURMAN: We have so many other things, al-

though this is crucial, I can't take a week off work and

study the report. I don't think anyone else can afford to

do ic eicher,

MR. MOLHOLT: You have already seen that there

flR500M5H tht page Kilned In this inane, it not as readabl^or, , , , _ .label, it is due to tubttandand colon on condition oi tht original page.

Page 114: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

1 7

8

9

10

11

- • 12

13

14

IS

16

i "| 18

i "j 20

! 21a« 22

| 23

24

25

107

are some clocks running out. If we had chis same type

processing a year ago we might have been moving some things

off site. Things are changing. Options become limited and

so on, We don'c have an infinite amount of time for a num-

ber of proposals, If my suggestion can't be met due to con-

straints on time and budgets and so on, I can understand

chac.

I am Jusc offering chac as a possibility,

MS. SINCLAIR: Can we now adjourn the meeting?

This will be the last question. You are all going to

send your written comments to us,

Mr, Romano, you are going to send your wriccen comments

to us so are you Dr. Roberts, and so is the borough council. /

With request for an extension. And everyone else from che

public, anyone else siccing in Chis room is asked and encour-

aged co also send in their comments.

The only reason I singled out these people, they were

che ones who had the most comments chis evening.

JOHN BROOKS; I am not a resident. I live in

New York. I am here as an attorney.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: What is your inCeresc? Who

are you representing?

MR. BROOKS: In chis meecing who am I represenc-

ing?

I am an attorney with the firm of Richards and O'Nell

•t

1

A R 5 Q 0 1 I 6

It the page Kilned in this inane, it not at readabte^or, legible, as.i ; label, it Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt. '

Page 115: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

o2

3

4

S

8

1 7

8

9

10

11

12

G14

IS

16

5 "f 18

i 19i 20

I1i 22

I 23

24

25

O

108

in New York and we represent a potentially responsibla

party sued in this case, concerning chis sice.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Okay.

MR, BROOKS: Certain assumptions hare been

talked about of which I'm wondering <f you could clarify for

me. You talked about 1.26 million cubic yards, As I under-

stand that volume metric amount concerns not asbestos, but

the calcium carbonate as well as asbestos; is that correct?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; That is everything, asbestos

and calcium.

MR. BROOKS: So we are dealing really with ten

percent of that figure which is a potential, an alleged po-

tential hazard substance,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Well the way ic's broken down

there are parts of it where ic's cen percent,

MR, -BROOKS: I'm calking in cerms of total

volume.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; What of thac is asbestos of

chat whole volume, 1,26 million is asbestos?

MR, BROOKS; yes, sir. Is che cen percent figure

the figure chac we can work with?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I would say a little more,

something like 15, 20.

MR. BROOKS: So we are calking about in fact,

abouc not 1.26 million cubic yards of hazardous material but

AR5Q'OII7

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable,or legible as. this-label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 116: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

5

6

I 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

j 17

j 18

i «j 20

i

S1 22

\ 23

24

25

109 .

126,000 or so cubic yards?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It's all mixed in.

MR. BROOKS: According to your report which I

have taken some time co read, apparently Che asbestos which

you alleged is in there is on Cop?

MR. ABR'EU-CINTRON: Yeah. Most of the very high

concentrations are on the top. True moat of ic is on Che

Cop,

MR, BROOKS: So if most of it is on the Cop,

could you direct me where in the report is the recommenda-

tion that the asbestos on Che top be sucked out from the

top as in last in, first out? Rather proposing to this

group of concerned residents the hypothetical fear chac you (

have eo somehow cue into the botcom of chis mountain and

face the concern of the white ooze eating out Ambler as Dr,

Mulholt suggested,

MR. MOLHOLT; Let's firsc just clarify the fact

that the plant pile has asbestos down to 15 foot depth from

the top and Che Locuac Screec pile has asbestos above cen

percent level down to 35 foot depths. So ic is not just con-

veniently something that can be scraped off the cop, I just

want to clarify a misconception. If you read the report,

you muse know the geographical descriptions.

MR. BROOKS: Sir, I am just trying eo ascercain

whether or not all the other facts have been brought out.

« n 5 0 0 1 j Q. ..... . " ————— ••- -• . . . . . - , - - • — -..- . ,. . .... .„.....,..,.„,„ ...WMWMI

wX

pI*W'<

U tht pagt Kilned In this {narnt it not as readable..or legible as this---label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 117: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

I

--

5i

i31s13

12

3

4

S

6

7

a9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

ta19

20

21

22

23

24

25

110As I understand it is your position Chat most of the asbestos

is on the cop,

MR. MOLHOLT: In the Locust Street pile you have

above Cen percent —

MR. BROOKS; Sir, that is in a particular sample;

is Chac correct?

MS. SINCLAIR: This court reporter needs a ten

minute break, You have to wait ten minutes. We can restart

the meeting at five of.

Is' chat okay with you?

(Short recess was taken,)

MR. MOLHOLT; As luck would have it, we are back

on the record now, We caucused during the break about Mr,

Brooks question and decided that since this case is under

pending litigation that we really will not be able co enter-

tain your questions since you are not a local resident. And

we would refer you to talk to our lawyer on the case, Lydia

Sails.

MR. BROOKS: I am not asking questions about

the licigation. I am not asking questions — I am not

required Co be a resident.

MR. MOLHOLT: There is no ~

MR. BROOKS: As Ms. Sinclair has stated on che

record --

MR, MOLHOLT: There is no provision for a public

AR500II9

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at reada6l.e_j>*. legible.,as.tabel, it is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 118: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

.-

5)

I3j3

1 £•;

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

to11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

ia19

20

21

22

23

24

25

111

meeting like chis co encercain j'our quescions from a liti-

gate posture representing one of Cho parties,

MR, BROOKS: Sir, I am noc asking you a question

like chat. As a member of the —

MR. MOLHOLT: You are crying Co build up an

administrative record In order Co substantiate your lawsuit,

MR. BROOKS: Sir, I am asking you questions about

something you are putting forward as part of the administra-

tive record, And if what you are telling me now is the rsaso

for che adjournment is to allow you to caucus to make chis

ploy, I am going to resent chis.

MR, MOLHOLT: We are saying on che record we will

noc encercain your quescions ac chis cime.

If chere are quescions from che cicizens, fine.

MR, BROOKS: Unless Chere is an objection from

the citizens, I would like to be able to put my questions

into the record, If you think you have a basis under the

Administrative Procedure Act for noc answering them, chat

is fine with me, But I would suggesc you don'c and therefore

this public hearing is not a public hearing and therefore

we don't have a comment period ac all.

MR. MOLHOLT: Mr. Brooks, we do noc have legal

counsel present. Ic is improper for us Co go on Co build

up a record chac would be used in che courtroom under those

auspices.

iAR500I20

It the page Kilned In this inane, it not at readable .or..legible,,a.,[label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.

Page 119: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O 12

3

4

S

6

| 7

a9

10

11

-- ' 12

13

14

15

16

I "! ">J 19

j 20jI 211: 22! 23

24

25

112

Therefore, I refer you and your quescions to either

Mrs, Sails or Co Mrs, Sails' cechnical staff present,

MR. BROOKS: Is ic my quescions or che fact that

I am asking them which you find them objectionable?

MR. MOLHOLT: I find objectionable che fact chac

you are representing a responsible party and you have noc

identified ic,

MR. BROOKS: Turner Null which is now known as

TNNPLC.

MR. MOLHOLT: We are Crying ac chis poinc noc

to build up a record for che courc case. We are trying to

answer questions for the citizens of Ambler concerning Che

proposed remedial alternative,

MR, BROOKS: And I am asking you quescions abouc

the proposed remedial alternative.

MR. MOLHOLT; I sincerely doubt thac you have

at your heart the protection of the citizens of Ambler,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Let's do this. This was

raised between us and I know because I am working on the

case.

Let's hear the questions maybe. But we reserve the

right if we feel, I gueas, if I feel it may in some way harm

the case I basically I will get buck to you with that. Is

that okay? I will refer you to my attorney.

MR. BROOKS; No. I really don'c chink chae is

AR500I2I

"/, in Pi* <*«"« not at . , a s . . slabel, it is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 120: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

1

.,

2S

a8

5

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

It

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

113 1

okay, I don't think you have chac righc in a public meet- '"'

ing co determine what quescions you are going to answer and

what you are not. I appreciate it, I will ask the question.

If you are not going Co answer chem, don'c answer them. The

chips will fall where chey may,

My quescions .will in fact go to your report which I

have read, And spent some time reading, I am noc going Co

sic here and ask you co explain litigation strategies chac

have been taken. BuC chere are comments in chis reporc

chac do noc concern quote, unquote, che good citizens of

Ambler, but that do concern solely TNN, and surely if you

have a basis to put chae before che cicizens, someone should

have an opportunity Co sec the record straight, i"

If you wane to deny that opportunity co me Conighc,

thac is fine, I would suggest co you chacie is noc consis-

tent with Che Administrative Procedure Act,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; We will answer your ques-

cions.

MR. BROOKS: Thank you.

Technically speaking, sir, how long would ic take for

the slurry calcium carbonate slurry chae is in chere co con-

tinue to solidify to a point where ic is solid? You said

that process is happening naturally,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: You mean entirely? We didn't

look into thac. We just looked into, we saw che event

AR500I22

~li'tht- pagt Kilned in thl* t*«ne Is «ot as reada6le..or legiWelvaslabel, it is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page. J

Page 121: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

114O ' occurring, We saw something we didn't chink ic was occurring

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Ic was something chac was jusc happening naturally.

MR, BROOKS; Is it happening in any sore of pat-

tern such chac it could be described as the outside in or

the inside out?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It seems to be calcium

carbonate contact with the slag, It actually penetrates in-

side and fills it and then it gets exposed Co the oxygen with

in the pores, seeing the calcium carbonate is over 120 per-

cent saturated when ic gees into slag and cinder outer coac,

ic dries up,

MR. BROOKS: So chen ie would be from che sim-

plistic terms from the outside in?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Exactly. Getting hard inside

Like a skin or someching,

MR. BROOKS; AC Page 1-4 of your report of Che

Wescon Repore and I believe 1C was you, Mayor, who asked and

che concraccor is Roy Wescon — Senator, I'm sorry. Roy

Wescon. Page 1-4 discusses the hazard ranking system, Regu-

latory status,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: First paragraph?

MR. BROOKS; Under .1.1.2.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Yes.

MR.' BROOKS: Ambler was evaluated in June 1984

and received a score of, and the scores are listed. When

RR5001.23

"! •* H0t ••" « « « « « u j M . « « i 4 J f cl, it it due to substandard color or condition of, tht original pagt.

Page 122: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

5

6

7

you are calking abouc Ambler, you were calking here abouc

che Ambler Asbescos sices, including Maple Street sices and

che plant dump site?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It includes the Locust pile,

plane pile, pipe plant pile and the , , ,

MR. BROOKS: Okay.

MR, ABREU-CINTRON: Ic does noc include che

Maple which was once around MCDonalds,

MR, BROOKS; If I understand what you have

written here, the plant dump pile, what is being referred

to as Che Cercainceed pile, chat is primarily composed of

asbestos cemenc pipe off spect dump?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: Yeah. Records show that

Certainteed did, take defective cement pipe, went over

it with a bulldozer and crushed it,

MR. BROOKS: And the basis of thac hazardous

ranking is che presence of asbestos in chose three piles;

is thac correct?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: The basis, the SM and SPC

you see chere came abouc due eo Che effaces of migracion

through air caused by, ac che cime assumed or ac che cime

che Locust Screec plane and Cercainteed, There is a whole

factor chac goes in Chere, I don'c know if you have ever

seen che package, how it is done, There is an equation,

population readings and how close the population is to the

It the page Kilned In this inant it not at readable.**, legible, aslabel, It is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.

Page 123: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O 12

3

4

S

6

! 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

i I7

1 ">5 19Sj 20jI 21a3 22

j 23

24

25

;

116sice and you put Chis lone equation and you come up with

chis number, 34,7 and —

MR. MOLHOLT: As a point of Information, how many

quescions do you have, sir?

MR. BROOKS: I don'c think I have more than five

minutes worth,

MR, MOLHOLT: Sounds good,

MR, BROOKS: It might be ten, but I don'c incend

to keep either of us all night,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: But che readings encompassed

the Locust Plane and Certainteed.

MR. BROOKS: Given this RI/FS is specific to

Locust Street and the plant pile and not the Certainceed pile

whac would chat hazardous ranking be for those two sices?

ABREU-CINTRON: Jusc for che Locusc Screec plane?

You mean as ic scands now?

MR. BROOKS; As 1C stood in June of '84.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I really don'c know.

MR. BROOKS: Is it in that hazardous ranking

package which I have not seen, but I presume you have?

MR, MOLHOLT: No. That is a hypothetical. Ic»

cannot be addressed.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: It looked at everyehing.

I don'c think it can easily — air samples of very stringent

sense. Ic's easy Co read but decermining exactly where 1C

AR5QG125

It the page Kilned In this inane. Is «»t as readable .or. legible,aslabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.i[ •

Page 124: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

S

6

I 7

8

9

10

It

-- • 12

13

14

15

16

s '7j 18

I 19•

i 20i -S 22

§ 23

24

25

117 fcomes from -- "

MR. MOLHOLT; It is not 19 points from one

part of che sice and five points for a third, It's noc

divided.

MR. BROOKS: So chere is no breakdown?

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: No, not at all.

MR. BROOKS: You Calked abouc the fact thac

asbestos was placed into, and lee's limit ic since this is

where the RI/FS is limited, into che Locust Street pile and

the plant pile, at some point in time,

Do you know in what form thac asbestos was at the time

it was deposited? I mean are we talking about raw asbestos

fiber? (

MR. BRESNAN; Sir, I am going to interrupt you,

Mr, Bresnan, Assistant Solicitor for Ambler Borough,

Would you please state for the record how your ques-

tions Chac you are asking specifically go Co Che alterna-

tives thac were being brought before the citizenry tonight

as opposed Co your simply laying a foundation for your law-

suit which is how you cautioned yourself as being a repre-

sentative of a party eo che lawsuic?

MR. BROOKS: Sir, I said chac my questions con-

cerned ehe RI/FS, My understanding is thac it is a public

meecing to be held in order Co allow Che public to ask ques-

tions and comment upon the RI/FS.

1

F— V 1

D

^500126

It the page Kilned In this <rane Is not as readable .or legible aslabel, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt. , >'•'

Page 125: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

n

o

12

3

4

9

6

! 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

I "! '8i 19j 20j: 21a3' 22

1 23

24

25

;

The alternatives in che

118

RI/FS as I understand it, are

predicated on a certain set of facts which are found not

only in the one volume of alternatives, but the other four

volumes of the RI/FS.

MR. MOLHOLT: And the entire Superfund legisla-

tion and Congress b.ack in 1776,

MR. BROOKS; Well

MR. MOLHOLT: It

MR. BRESNAN: Is

I am noc asking you abouc chac,

is close,

ic safe co say chac every one

of those yellow slips of paper represents a question we are

going to hear abouc tonight?

MR. BROOKS: Noc

Perhaps instead I could

spend some Cime reading ic so

cuff or oue of che hat. I'm

you if you knew in what form

allegedly dumped or deposited

MR. ABRKU-CINTRON

have to go back Co the office

Off che cop of my hem! I don*

MR. BROOKS: but

cace how?

MR. ABREU-CINTl/lN

I can verify ic, yes. There

and I have eo check.

ac all,

represent eo you chat I did

che queseions are not off the

sorry, I think I was asking

asbestos was at the cime ic was

.

: I can't right now. I would

and check ic out to be exacc,

C know how it was.

you have documents which indi-

: I have co check and see.

might be some documents, yes,

AR5-00127

It the page Kilned In this t««ne Is not a, .kt»-»»)?.*u..-..».,»—»—.-»..*.,iw~'-label, It Is due to substandard color or condition ot the original page.'i n

Page 126: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

12

3

4

5

6

! 7

8

9

to11

12

13

14

IS

16

j "i 18

i 19

j 20

i 213' 22

1 23

24

25

119MR. BROOKS: Thac will be greac. C

In your report ac Page 1-24 and lacer on again ac

Page 3-1, you calk about the fact chac Turner Null boughc

che site in 1933, Could you cell me, sir, whac information

you have chac suggescs Chat Turner Null boughc che sice ac

anytime?

MR. BRESNAN: That clearly has nothing to do with

the betterment of Ambler or Che options that were presented

Conighc. That can . clearly or plainly be a question

addressed only to your future litigation,

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: I can supply you with docu-

ments necessary.

MR. BROOKS: For the record, let me simply ,

state that Turner and Null never boughc che sice. The Jus-

tice Department hasn't even alleged chac Turner and Null

bought the site, at anytime.

MR. MOLHOLT: May the record reflect the coxico-

logist is leaving. If anybody has health quescions, I'm

here for five more minutes,

Good nighc, Mr. Brooks.

MR. BROOKS; Good nighc, Dr. Molholc.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON: More quescions?

MR. BROOKS; I. chink chac probably is going Co

wrap ie up for now.

MR. ABREU-CINTRON; Any quescions you can again

1

D

C

tpaa Kilned ""in 'this t««ne Is not as reada6l.e..« legl Jl^f!abel, it Is due to substandard color or condition ot tht oniginal pagt.

Page 127: IR500003 · 2020. 12. 12. · 83 20 Everybody right Everybody's proposal right 85 15 alternatives which alternatives for hazardous waste sites which 86 6 is all was the best alternative

O

o

1

I!i31as1\

i2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

120

with a letter in written formal request, send them

to our office,MS. SINCLAIR; Request for documents goes

through the Information Act.Thank you all for coming and please, send your

comments in as we asked over and over tonight.

(Hearing adjourned at 10:15 p.m.)

REPORTED BY:

DEBRA L. PULASKI,CSRReporter-Notary Public

'-.

AR5-OOI29, .

Kilned I n this <ra*e I s n o t a 4 , . . ! .label, It Is due to substandard color or condition oi tht oniginal pagt.