iron in the fire: how does bermudagrass respond?

5
Iron in the Fire: How Does Bermudagrass Respond? Travis Shaddox, Ph.D. Background Most turf managers use an Fe component in granular fertilizer Soil test may or may not recommend applications of Fe in Florida soils No consideration is given to the form of Fe Iron is an economic concern, not environmental. Objective To determine the influence of various Fe sources on turf response Materials and Methods Treatments – Untreated Iron Sulfate Iron Sucrate Iron Humate Iron Chelate (5% EDTA) Iron Oxide Iron Sulfate - Foliar Rate 20 lb Fe / A Locations Citra - Princess Jay – Tifgrand 6 weeks Site Information Citra Princess Bermuda Trts applied May 7 No prior fertilization Soil pH 7.2 Turf was not acceptable at initiation Jay Tifgrand Bermuda Trts applied July 7 Fertilized 4 weeks prior Soil pH 7.3 Turf was acceptable at initiation

Upload: vuhuong

Post on 16-Jan-2017

231 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Iron in the Fire:How Does Bermudagrass

Respond?

Travis Shaddox, Ph.D.

Background

Most turf managers use an Fe component in granular fertilizer

Soil test may or may not recommend applications of Fe in Florida soils

No consideration is given to the form of Fe

Iron is an economic concern, not environmental.

Objective

To determine the influence of various Fe sources on turf response

Materials and Methods

Treatments– Untreated

– Iron Sulfate

– Iron Sucrate

– Iron Humate

– Iron Chelate (5% EDTA)

– Iron Oxide

– Iron Sulfate - Foliar

Rate– 20 lb Fe / A

Locations– Citra - Princess

– Jay – Tifgrand

6 weeks

Site Information

Citra

Princess Bermuda

Trts applied May 7

No prior fertilization

Soil pH 7.2

Turf was not acceptable at initiation

Jay

Tifgrand Bermuda

Trts applied July 7

Fertilized 4 weeks prior

Soil pH 7.3

Turf was acceptable at initiation

Variables Analyzed

Rapid Laboratory Extraction

Soil Incubation

Turf Quality– 1 to 9

Yield– grams

NDVI– Normalized difference vegetation index

– Measures natural green color

Rapid Extraction Setup

Rapid Lab Extraction

Extr 0 Extr 1 Extr 2 Extr 3 Extr 4

Fe

Ext

ract

ed (

%)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Sulfate Sucrate Humate Oxide Chelate

Cumulative Fe Extracted (%)

313 a

103 b

35 c

4 d 0.5 d0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Chelate Sulfate Humate Sucrate Oxide

Aerial Photo – Citra week 3

Turf Quality - Jay

Jay - Tifgrand

Days after Fertilization

0 7 14 21 28 35

Tur

f Q

ualit

y

4

5

6

7

8

9

10Control Sulfate Sucrate Humate Oxide Chelate Sulfate-F

Turf Quality - Citra

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Turf

Qu

alit

y

Days After Initiation

2014

Control

EDTA

Foliar

Humate

Oxide

Sucrate

Sulfate

Turf Quality - Citra

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Turf

Qu

alit

y

Days After Initiation

2015

Control

EDTA

Foliar

Humate

Oxide

Sucrate

Sulfate

Turf Quality

a

b bc bc bc bc c

4

5

6

7

8

9

Sulfate-F Chelate Sulfate Sucrate Oxide Humate Control

Jay - 16 DAA

Turf Quality

a

b b b bcbc

c

4

5

6

7

8

Sulfate-F Sucrate Humate Control Chelate Oxide Sulfate

Citra - 4 DAA

NDVI

Jay - Tifgrand

Days after Fertilization

0 7 14 21 28 35

ND

VI

0.52

0.54

0.56

0.58

0.60

0.62

0.64

0.66

Control Sulfate Sucrate Humate Oxide Chelate Sulfate-F

Citra - Princess

Days after Fertilization

0 7 14 21 28 35

ND

VI

0.52

0.54

0.56

0.58

0.60

0.62

0.64

0.66

Control Sulfate Sucrate Humate Oxide Chelate Sulfate-F

NDVI

a

ab abb b

b b

0.56

0.57

0.58

0.59

0.6

0.61

0.62

Sulfate-F Chelate Humate Oxide Control Sulfate Sucrate

Jay - 21 DAA

NDVI

aa a

ab ab

ab

b0.56

0.57

0.58

0.59

0.6

0.61

0.62

Sulfate-F Control Humate Chelate Sulfate Sucrate Oxide

Citra - avg

Yield

Citra - Princess

Days after Fertilization

7 14 21 28 35

Yie

ld (

g)

2

4

6

8

10

12Control Sulfate Sucrate Humate Oxide Chelate Sulfate-F

Jay - Tifgrand

Days after Fertilization

7 14 21 28 35

Yie

ld (

g)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18Control Sulfate Sucrate Humate Oxide Chelate Sulfate-F

Average Yield (g)

a a a a a a

a

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Sucrate Humate Chelate Oxide Sulfate-F Sulfate

Jay

Citra

Average Yield (g)

a a a a a a

a

aa a a

a

a a

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Sucrate Humate Chelate Oxide Sulfate-F Sulfate

Jay

Citra

WHY IS TURFGRASS RESPONDING TO FOLIAR IRON?

Soil Incubation

Objective

To determine the solubility of Fe applied as sulfate or glucoheptonate in 2 Florida Soils

Soil Incubation

Methodology

2 soils– Citra

– Jay

2 Iron Products– Sulfate

– Glucoheptonate

Extractions– 1h, 4h, 1d, 1wk, 2wk, 3wk

Soluble Fe – Citra Soil

0

25

50

75

100

1 h 4 h 1 d 1 wk 2 wk 3 wk

% o

f A

pp

lied

Length of Incubation

Sulfate

Glucoheptanate

Soluble Fe – Jay Soil

0

25

50

75

100

1 h 4 h 1 d 1 wk 2 wk 3 wk

% o

f A

pp

lied

Length of Incubation

Sulfate

Glucoheptanate

Summary

Chelate and sulfate produced the highest amounts of extractable Fe

Foliar sulfate increased turf quality on Princess and Tifgrand

Tifgrand - foliar sulfate and chelate were the only source that increase turf color

No source influenced yield

Importance

Granular Fe increases the cost of granular fertilizer and does not increase turfgrass quality– We have observed a response to granular Fe (EDTA

& Humate) in 1 of 9 studies!

Foliar applications should be considered– 6 studies on 3 different turfgrasses in 2 locations and

2 years - we have observed a response to foliar Fe in every study

Contact Info

Travis Shaddox

University of Florida

Environmental Horticulture

office 352-273-4591

cell 352-262-3426

[email protected]

@TravisShaddox