is the canadian model of democracy different?. how are we different? how different are we? part 1:...
TRANSCRIPT
Is the Canadian Model Is the Canadian Model of Democracy Different?of Democracy Different?
How are We Different? How How are We Different? How Different are We?Different are We?Part 1: IntroductionPart 2: The Structure of GovernmentPart 3: Public Policy
Political Institutions -- The Political Institutions -- The Structure of GovernmentStructure of GovernmentMAIN QUESTIONS:
– Are the political institutions of Canada and the United States structured differently so that it appears that they were modeled on fundamentally different models of democracy?
– Do the political institutions of Canada and the United States differ in ways that would lead us to expect differences in public policy?
Political Institutions -- The Political Institutions -- The Structure of GovernmentStructure of Governmentthe Constitutionthe judiciarythe legislaturethe executivefederalismmechanisms of popular representation
Constitutional RightsConstitutional Rights
January 21
Themes of the Constitutional Themes of the Constitutional OrdersOrdersAmerican Constitution...
– life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (Declaration of Independence)
– Bill of Rights
Canadian Constitution...– peace, order and good government (s.91
Constitution Act)– parliamentary sovereignty
Models of DemocracyModels of Democracy
Limited Gov’t
General Welfare
High Mass Participation
Low Mass Participation
Participatory Participatory DemocracyDemocracy
Elite Elite DemocracyDemocracy
Liberal Liberal Democracy Democracy
Liberal Liberal Democracy IIDemocracy IILife, Liberty and the Life, Liberty and the
Pursuit of HappinessPursuit of Happiness
Peace, Order and Peace, Order and Good GovernmentGood Government
Democracy:Democracy:Where’s the Canadian Political System?Where’s the Canadian Political System?
Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t
General Welfare
High Mass Participation
Low Mass Participation
Participatory Participatory DemocracyDemocracy
Elite Elite DemocracyDemocracy
Liberal Liberal Democracy I Democracy I
Canada
Canada
Liberal Liberal Democracy II Democracy II
The Canadian Charter of Rights The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982)and Freedoms (1982)fundamental freedomsdemocratic rightslegal rightsequality rightsminority language education rightsmobility rights
American Civil Liberties -- American Civil Liberties -- What Are They?What Are They?
TYPES OF CIVIL LIBERTIES– FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS
“Congress shall make no law...”– freedom of conscience– freedom of expression
– LEGAL RIGHTS DUE PROCESS
– against unreasonable search and seizure– against self-incrimination
vs. Civil Rights– adhere to individuals (civil liberties) rather than groups (civil
rights)– negative vs. positive freedom
Type of Right Canada United States
Fundamental Freedoms
Yes Yes
Democratic Rights
Yes Yes
Legal Rights Yes Yes
Equality Rights Yes Yes
Language Rights
Yes No
Mobility Rights Yes No
Bear Arms No Yes (disputed)
Property No Yes
Limits on the Canadian Charter Limits on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedomsof Rights and FreedomsSection 1: reasonable limits
– comparable limits on the American Bill of Rights?
Limits on the Canadian Charter Limits on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedomsof Rights and FreedomsSection 33: Notwithstanding Clause
– comparable limits on the American Bill of Rights?
No!
– application does not apply to democratic rights, mobility rights,
minority language education rights
Limits on the Canadian Charter Limits on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedomsof Rights and FreedomsSection 33: Notwithstanding Clause
– usage very difficult to use politically “notwithstanding” raises caution flags
– examples of use Quebec blanket use Saskatchewan nurses’ strike
Legalized Politics -- The Legalized Politics -- The ImplicationsImplications
positive aspects of legalized politics– offers access– not based on popular opinion
negative aspects of legalized politics– style of politics
adversarial not prone to compromise
– atomizing people define themselves as individuals rather than
members of community/society