iso/tc67/sc7 – singapore - jstra.jp 0-16.pdf · natural gas industries - offshore structures ....

ISO/TC67/SC7 – Singapore

N 802 Agenda for SC7 Singapore 20-21 January 2016.docx 3 of 7

Draft agenda for the 37th meeting of ISO/TC67/SC7 – 20-21 January 2016 in Singapore, Singapore

Reference

1. Opening of the meeting and welcome from host organisations (09.30)

2. Roll call of delegates

3. Adoption of the agenda N 802

4. Appointment of the resolutions drafting panel

5. Report of the Secretariat N XXX

6. Report of the 36th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 (March 15 Delft) N 781 & N 782

7. ISO/TC 67 matters (Chairman)

8. Report on progress from ISO/TC 67/SC 7 Working Groups

8.1. Report from WG1 (T Brown)

a) ISO 19900 General requirements 3d Ed. NP ballot closes 2015-12-12

2nd Ed. Published 2013 N 794, N 795

8.2. Report from WG3 (M Abraham)

a) ISO 19901-1 Metocean 2nd Ed. passed FDIS 2015-06-18, should be published before end 2015

1st Ed. Published 2005 N 755, N 788

b) ISO 19901-2 Seismic design 2nd Ed. out for DIS closing 2015-11-13.

1st Ed. Published 2004 N 803

c) ISO 19901-3 Topsides 2nd Edition published 2014-12.

2nd Ed. Published 2014

d) ISO 19901-9 Structural Integrity Management NWIP for development of 1st Edition - 2013-01 (DIS was due May 2015, cancellation 2016-08-01)

Registered February 2013 N 559, N 628, N 681

e) ISO 19902 Fixed Steel Structures NWIP for development of 2nd Edition 2013-09. Cancellation 2016-06-18

1st Ed. Amd Published 2013 N 641, N 644, N 749

8.3. Report from WG4 (Kolbjørn Høyland)

a) ISO 19903 Fixed Concrete NWIP approved 2014-09, under revision

1st Ed. Published 2006 N 722, N 744, N 745

8.4. Report from WG5 (S Balasubramanian)

a) ISO 19901-7 Stationkeeping NWIP for 3rd edition approved 2013-09 - cancellation 2016-06-18.

2nd Ed.Published 2013 N 662

b) ISO 19904-1 Floating structures (Review 2014) NWIP for 2nd edition - 2013-07 - cancellation 2016-04-07

1st Ed. Published 2006 N 632, N671

http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=17068431&objAction=Open








http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=15042111&objAction=Open&viewType=1











yakabe

タイプライターテキスト

別添 0



8.5. Report from WG6 (J Strømgseng)

a) ISO 19901-5 Weight engineering 2nd Edition FDIS version sent to ISO 2015-06-16


8.6. Report from WG7 (M Hoyle)

a) ISO 19905-1 Site Specific Assessment of Jack-ups Currently under minor revision FDIS starting 2015-10-01


b) ISO 19905-2/TR Jack-ups Commentary and Example Calc. First edition published November 2013 with publication date December 2012 to mirror 19905-1.


c) ISO 19905-3 Floating units - NWIP for development of 1st Edition - November 2011. DIS was due 2015-07-28.

Registered November 2011 N 538, N 675

d) ISO 19905-4 Preliminary working title = Jack-up emplacement and removal at a site

Not registered, being discussed/developed

8.7. Report from WG 8 (K Muggeridge)

a) ISO 19906 Arctic structures NWIP for development of 2nd Edition - February 2014.


8.8. Report from WG 9 (A van der Marel)

a) ISO 19901-6 Marine operations (Review 2012) Corrigendum published 2011-09-23 Revised NWIP approved 2015-07-24


8.9. Report from WG 10 (J-L Colliat)

a) ISO 19901-4 Foundations (Review 2008) NWIP for development of 2nd Edition approved 2011-11. Now 48 month track (DIS approved 2015-04-24)

1st Ed. Published 2003 N 540, N 539, N 673, N 748, N 785

b) ISO 19901-8 Geotechnical Marine Soil Investigation published 2014-11.

1st Ed. Published Nov. 2014 N 740, N 746

c) Geophysical site investigation Not registered, being discussed/developed

8.10. Report from WG 11 (D Steensen)

a) ISO 10855-1 - Offshore containers -- Part 1: Design, manufacture and marking Draft sent to DIS 2015-09-29

N 796, N 799

b) ISO 10855-2 - Offshore containers -- Part 2: Lifting sets Draft sent to DIS 2015-09-30

N 797, N 800

c) ISO 10855-3 - Offshore containers -- Part 3: Periodic innspection examination and testing Draft sent to DIS 2015-09-29

N 798, N 801

d) ISO 10855-4 - Offshore containers -- Part 4: Operational requirements and maintenance

Not registered, being discussed/developed






























9. Review of progress against programme for ISO/TC 67/SC7

10. 10-Year Strategy for Standard Development and Maintenance (Chairman)

11. ISO/TC 67/SC 7 liaisons and other matters

11.1. CEN/TC 12 “Materials & equipment petroleum & gas industries” (Chairman)

11.2. CEN/TC 250 “Structural Eurocodes” (Secretary)

11.3. ISO/TC 8 “Ships & marine technology” (A Spackman)

11.4. ISO/TC 38/WG 21 “Ropes, cordage, slings and netting” (R Rossi)

11.5. ISO/TC 98 “Actions and loading” (T Brown)

11.6. IADC Drilling (A Spackman)

11.7. ISO/TC 104/SC 2 Freight Containers. Specific purpose containers (B Brassington)

12. Requirements concerning subsequent meetings – Next meeting (38th) dates and venue to be confirmed.

N 782 section 13

13. Any other business

14. Approval of resolutions

15. Closure of the meeting

Please Note: Further documents for the meeting will be uploaded on the ISO/TC 67/SC 7 Livelink website as and when received. Please regularly visit our site at: http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink especially before leaving for the meeting. Dr Charles Whitlock Secretary to ISO/TC 67/SC 7


http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink

BSI Standards, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL Telephone: + +44 (020) 8996 9000 Fax: + +44 (020) 8996 7400

Our ref: ISO/TC 67/SC 7/N 828 Date: 19 January 2016 Direct Tel: +44 20 8996 7246 Direct Fax: +44 20 8996 7799 Email: [email protected] Secretariat of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 Materials, equipment and offshore structures for petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries - Offshore structures

Secretary's Report 2016 of ISO/ TC 67/SC 7 Materials, equipment and offshore structures for petroleum, petrochemical and

natural gas industries - Offshore structures 1 ISO/TC 67/SC 7 Structure and Resources This section gives an overview of the existing structure for ISO/TC 67/SC 7 and its resources, Chairperson: Mr. Philip Smedley (United Kingdom) until end 2016 Secretary: Dr C A Whitlock ISO Member responsible: BSI The Chairman has been confirmed by ISO TMB to the end of 2016.

1.1 The Working Groups are as follows: All convenors were confirmed for a further three years at the Copenhagen meeting in June 2013. WG Title NSB Convenor AG Advisory group BSI Philip Smedley WG 1 General requirements SCC Tom Brown (Marc Maes interim) WG 3 Fixed steel structures ANSI Moises Abraham WG 4 Fixed concrete structures SN Kolbjørn Høyland WG 5 Floating systems ANSI Sathish Balasubramanian WG 6 Weight engineering SN Joar Strømgseng WG 7 Site specific assessment of

mobile offshore units (MOUS) BSI Mike Hoyle

WG 8 Offshore Arctic structures SCC Karen Muggeridge WG 9 Marine operations NEN Arend van der Marel WG 10 Foundations AFNOR Jean Louis Colliat WG 11 Offshore freight containers SN Dag Steensen

1.2 Participating Members Country Organisation

1. Argentina IRAM 2. Brazil ABNT 3. Canada SCC 4. China SAC 5. Denmark DS 6. Finland SFS 7. France AFNOR

Document: ISO/TC 67/SC 7

N 828

mailto:[email protected]

yakabe


別添 1

N 828 SC 7 Secretarys Report Jan 2016.docx 2

Country Organisation 8. Germany DIN 9. Indonesia BSN 10. Iran ISIRI 11. Italy UNI 12. Japan JISC 13. Kazakhstan KAZMEMST 14. Korea, Republic of KATS 15. Malaysia DSM 16. Netherlands NEN 17. Norway SN 18. Qatar QS 19. Russia GOST R 20. Singapore SPRING SG 21. Spain AENOR 22. UK BSI (Secretariat) 23. USA A N S I

Total 23

1.3 Observer Members Country/Affiliation Organisation

1. Austria ASI 2. Belgium NBN 3. Egypt EOS 4. India BIS 5. ISO Central Secretariat ISO 6. Poland PKN 7. Romania ASRO 8. Saudi Arabia SASO 9. Serbia ISS 10. South Africa SABS

Total 9 plus ISO CS For completeness, I have also added ISO Central Secretariat as an O member. 2 Liaison

2.1.1 Liaison with Other Organisations

Liaison and other organisations, which are actively participating in the work of ISO/TC 67/SC 7, include:

• IACS - classification

• IADC - drilling

• IMO

• OGP

2.1.2 Other Technical Committees in liaison with ISO/TC 67/SC 7 are:

• ISO/TC 8 - Ships and marine technology

• ISO/TC 8/SC 4 - Outfitting and deck machinery

• ISO/TC 8/SC 8 - Ship design

• ISO/TC 38 - Textiles


• ISO/TC 71 - Concrete, reinforced concrete and pre-stressed concrete

• ISO/TC 98 - Bases for design of structures

• ISO/TC 104/SC 2 - Freight Containers

• ISO/TC 167 - Steel and aluminium structures 3 Work Programme This section gives an overview of existing and planned standardization projects,

3.1 Progress/Active items since Delft 2015 Standard Title Information/Action

ISO/AWI 19900 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- General requirements for offshore structures

NWIP approved 2015-12-04

ISO/DIS 10855-1 Offshore containers -- Part 1: Design, manufacture and marking

Out for DIS 2015-12-10 closing 2016-03-11

ISO/DIS 10855-2 Offshore containers -- Part 2: Lifting sets Out for DIS 2015-12-10 closing 2016-03-11

ISO/DIS 10855-3 Offshore containers -- Part 3: Periodic inspection examination and testing


ISO 19901-1:2015 (Ed. 2)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 1: Metocean design and operating considerations

Published 2015-10-14

ISO/DIS 19901-2 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria

DIS closed 2015-11-15

ISO/DIS 19901-4 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 4: Geotechnical and foundation design considerations

Sent to ISO for FDIS 2015-12-15

ISO 19901-5 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction

Passed FDIS 2015-12-31. Preparation for publication

ISO/AWI 19901-6 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 6: Marine operations

NWIP failed 2014-10-21 but has now passed on 2015-07-27. Work commencing.

ISO/NP 19901-7 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 7: Stationkeeping systems for floating offshore structures and mobile offshore units

Revision agreed 2013-12-18 waiting for CD/DIS version, Cancellation 2016-06-18 if no progress.

ISO 19901-8:2014 (Ed. 1)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 8: Marine soil Investigations

FDIS passed and standard published by ISO Nov 2014. CEN sent out for UAP closed 2015-07-26. passed

ISO/AWI 19901-9 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 9: Structural integrity management

NWIP approved 2013-02-01. Waiting for draft. Cancelation 2016-08-01. Draft just received!

ISO/NP 19902 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed steel offshore structures

NWIP agreed 2013-12-18, under revision. Cancelation 2016-06-18.

ISO/CD 19903 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed concrete offshore structures

NWIP approved 2014-09-25, under revision. Waiting for draft.

ISO/CD 19904-1 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Floating offshore structures -- Part 1: Monohulls, semi-submersibles and spars

NWIP agreed 2013-06-27 Cancellation 2016-04-07

ISO 19905-1:2016 (Ed. 2)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 1: Jack-ups

Corrigendum sent to ISO published as Ed 2

ISO/DIS 19905-3 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 3: Floating units

DIS started 2015-12-10, closing 2016-03-11

ISO/AWI 19906 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Arctic offshore structures

NWIP approved 2014-02-23. Under revision

http://isotc.iso.org/pp/project/details.action?project=69761&nav=NAVIGATION_DEFAULT





















3.2 Work items by working group

3.2.1 WG 1: General requirements

Standard Title Information/Action


NWIP approved 2015-12-04

ISO 19900:2013 (Ed. 2) Petroleum and natural gas industries -- General requirements for offshore structures

Published

3.2.2 WG 3: Fixed steel structures


ISO 19901-1:2005 (Ed. 1)


ISO 19901-1:2015 (Ed. 2)



ISO 19901-2:2004 (Ed. 1)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria


DIS closed 2015-11-15

ISO 19901-3:2014 (Ed. 2)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 3: Topsides structure

Revision passed DIS unanimously 2014-08-29. Published 2014-12-03

ISO 19902:2007/Amd 1:2013

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed steel offshore structures



NWIP agreed 2013-12-18, under revision. Cancelation 2016-06-18.

3.2.3 WG 4: Fixed concrete structures


ISO 19903:2006 (Ed. 1) Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed concrete offshore structures

Confirmed 2010-07-26, possible revision needed


NWIP approved 2014-09-25, under revision. Waiting for draft.

3.2.4 WG 5: Floating systems


ISO 19904-1:2006 (Ed. 1)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Floating offshore structures -- Part 1: Monohulls, semi-submersibles and spars

Confirmed 2010-03-25. . NWIP proposed see N 597.


NWIP agreed 2013-06-27 Cancellation 2016-04-07

ISO/NP 19904-2 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Floating offshore structures -- Part 2: Tension leg platforms

Registered with ISO 2004-04-26. Not published. Cancelled.

ISO 19901-7:2013 (Ed. 2)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 7: Stationkeeping systems for floating offshore structures and mobile offshore units


ISO/NP 19901-7 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 7: Stationkeeping systems for floating offshore structures and mobile offshore units

Revision agreed 2013-12-18 waiting for CD/DIS version, Cancellation 2016-06-18 if no progress.






















3.2.5 WG 6: Weight engineering

Standard Title Information/Action ISO 19901-5 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific

requirements for offshore structures -- Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction

Passed FDIS 2015-12-31. Preparation for publication

3.2.6 WG 7: Site specific assessment of mobile offshore units (MOUS) Standard Title Information/Action

ISO 19905-1:2012 (Ed. 1)


Corrigendum sent to ISO

ISO 19905-1:2016 (Ed. 2)


Corrigendum sent to ISO published as Ed 2

ISO/TR 19905-2:2012 (Ed. 1)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 2: Jack-ups commentary and detailed sample calculation

Approved for publication on 2013-04-10. Published dated 2012-12-15.

ISO/DIS 19905-3 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 3: Floating units

DIS started 2015-12-10, closing 2016-03-11

3.2.7 WG 8: Offshore Arctic structures Standard Title Information/Action

ISO 19906:2010 (Ed. 1) Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Arctic offshore structures




3.2.8 WG 9: Marine operations


ISO 19901-6:2009 (Ed. 1)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 6: Marine operations

Review due 2014-10-15

ISO 19901-6:2009/CD Cor 1

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 6: Marine operations -- Technical Corrigendum 1

Published 2011-11-23, NSB should have now published this version

ISO/AWI 19901-6 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 6: Marine operations

NWIP failed 2014-10-21 but has now passed on 2015-07-27. Work commencing.

3.2.9 WG 10: Foundations Standard Title Information/Action


Sent to ISO for FDIS 2015-12-15

ISO 19901-8:2014 (Ed. 1)

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 8: Marine soil Investigations

FDIS passed and standard published by ISO Nov 2014. CEN sent out for UAP closed 2015-07-26. passed

ISO 199XX Geotechnical investigation Not registered with ISO




















3.2.10 WG 11: Offshore freight containers Standard Title Information/Action

ISO/DIS 10855-1 Offshore containers -- Part 1: Design, manufacture and marking


ISO/DIS 10855-2 Offshore containers -- Part 2: Lifting sets Out for DIS 2015-12-10 closing 2016-03-11

ISO/DIS 10855-3 Offshore containers -- Part 3: Periodic inspection examination and testing


3.3 Actions for the Singapore meeting 2016

3.3.1 Formerly agree dates for the next SC 7 meeting in Norway and the next meetings.

3.3.2 Decide what to do with ISO/NP 19901-7, ISO/AWI 19901-9, ISO/NP 19902 and ISO/CD 19904-1

4 Working Group Activities Reports of the progress of each Working Group will be presented to the Plenary Meeting in Delft. Some reports are also available on Livelink. 5 ISO/TC 67/SC 7 BUSINESS PLAN The business plan is available on the ISO website. 6 Full plenary meetings in 2016 The next ISO/TC 67/SC 7 meeting will be on 20-21 January 2016 in Singapore. The SC7 meetings after Singapore is to be in Norway in Autumn 2016.








7 Annex- ISO/TC 67/SC 7 items in the ISO Project Portal

Alert Reference Document title Reg. date Stage date

Crnt stage Next date Limit date Time frame

VA Committee Project leader

C ISO/CD 19904-1 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Floating offshore structures -- Part 1: Monohulls, semi-submersibles and spars

2013-10-07

2013-10-07

30.99 2015-10-07

2015-10-07 (Cancellation date: 2016-04-07)

36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 5

Rossi, Ronaldo Mr;Frieze, Paul

C ISO/NP 19901-7 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 7: Stationkeeping systems for floating offshore structures and mobile offshore units

2013-12-18

2013-12-18

10.99 2015-12-18


36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 5

Ledoux, Alain Mr

C ISO/NP 19902 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed steel offshore structures

2013-12-18

2013-12-18

10.99 2015-12-18


36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 3

Abraham, Moises

W ISO/AWI 19901-9

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 9: Structural integrity management

2013-02-01

2013-02-11

20.00 2016-02-01


48 ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 3

O'Connor, Patrick Mr

ISO 19901-5 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction

2012-02-09

2016-01-08

60.00 2016-02-15

2016-02-09 48 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 6

Strømseng, Joar Mr


2011-11-03

2015-12-15

40.99 2016-02-16

2016-11-03 Extended ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 10

Colliat-Dangus, Jean-Louis M.

ISO/DIS 10855-3 Offshore containers and associated lifting sets -- Part 3: Periodic inspection, examination and testing

2014-07-14

2015-12-10

40.20 (Start date: 2015-12-10 End date: 2016-03-11)

2016-03-11

2017-07-14 36 ISO lead


Steensen, Dag Mr

ISO/DIS 19905-3 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 3: Floating unit

2011-11-03

2015-12-10


2016-03-11

2016-11-03 Extended ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 7

Stiff, John

ISO/DIS 10855-2 Offshore containers and associated lifting sets -- Part 2: Lifting sets -- Design, manufacture and marking

2014-07-14

2015-12-10


2016-03-11

2017-07-14 36 ISO lead


Steensen, Dag Mr





ISO/DIS 10855-1 Offshore containers and associated lifting sets -- Part 1: Offshore container - Design, manufacture and marking

2014-07-14

2015-12-10


2016-03-11

2017-07-14 36 ISO lead


Steensen, Dag Mr


2011-11-03

2015-11-15

40.60 2016-05-03

2016-11-03 Extended ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 3

Stock, Douglas


2014-09-25

2014-09-25

30.00 2016-09-25

2016-09-25 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 4

Høyland, Kolbjørn Mr


2014-02-26

2014-02-26

20.00 2017-02-26

2017-02-26 48 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 8

Masterson, Dan Dr

ISO/AWI 19901-6


2015-07-27

2015-07-27

20.00 2017-07-27

2017-07-27 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 9


2016-01-13

2016-01-13

20.00 2018-01-13

2018-01-13 36 Check VA (ISO lead)

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 1

Brown, Tom Dr

ISO/TR 19905-2:2012

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 2: Jack-ups commentary and detailed sample calculation

2012-01-13

2012-12-15

60.60 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 7

Hoyle, Mike Mr

ISO 19901-3:2014


2013-09-27

2014-12-03

60.60 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 3

Morris, Chris Mr.

ISO 19901-1:2015


2011-12-02

2015-10-14

60.60 48 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 3

Smith, Donald Mr

ISO 19901-6:2009/Cor 1:2011

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 6: Marine operations -- Technical Corrigendum 1

2011-10-19

2011-11-23

60.60 24 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 9

ISO 19902:2007 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed steel offshore structures

2003-09-15

2013-12-18

90.92 48 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7

Galbraith, David Mr.

ISO 19901-6:2009


2005-11-15

2014-03-05

90.92 48 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 9

van der Marel, A. Mr.

ISO 19904-1:2006

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Floating offshore structures -- Part 1: Monohulls, semi-submersibles and spars

2003-08-15

2013-03-26

90.92 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 5

Wolfram, Jr., W.R. Dr.





ISO 19901-8:2014

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 8: Marine soil investigations

2011-11-03

2014-11-28

60.60 36 ISO lead


Karlsen, Viggo Mr

ISO 19901-4:2003

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 4: Geotechnical and foundation design considerations

2000-07-20

2011-11-03

90.92 ISO lead


ISO 19901-5:2003

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction

2000-07-20

2012-02-09

90.92 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 6

Worren, E. Mr.

ISO 19900:2013 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- General requirements for offshore structures

2011-05-20

2015-09-01

90.92 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 1

Brown, Tom Dr

ISO 19906:2010 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Arctic offshore structures

2006-11-15

2013-11-23

90.92 48 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 8

Blanchet, Denis Mr.

ISO 19902:2007/Amd 1:2013

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed steel offshore structures -- Amendment 1

2011-11-03

2013-07-24

60.60 24 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7

Abraham, Moises

ISO 19903:2006 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Fixed concrete offshore structures

2004-03-15

2014-06-19

90.92 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 4

Leivestad, Steinar Mr

ISO 19901-2:2004

Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria

2001-01-01

2011-11-03

90.92 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 3

ISO 19905-1:2016


2014-12-04

2016-01-15

60.60 36 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 7

ISO 19901-7:2013


2011-02-04

2013-12-18

90.92 24 ISO lead

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/WG 5

Wolfram, Jr., W.R. Dr.

Our ref: ISO/TC 67/SC7 Date: 21 May 2015

Secretariat of ISO/TC 67/SC7 Offshore Structures for Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries To: ISO/TC 67/SC7 P- and O- Member Bodies

For forwarding to their National Delegates

and to

ISO/TC 67 Secretariat

ISO Central Secretariat

Secretariat report of the thirty sixth meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC7 'Offshore structures for the petroleum and natural gas industries' held at the NEN, Vlinderweg 6, 2623 AX Delft The Netherlands, on the 11-12 March 2015. Secretary's note: I have included hyperlinks to documents presented at the meeting in this report. These will only work for members who have access to ISO Livelink and know their password. They will need to login to see the documents.

1 Opening Piet-Hein Daverveldt, Managing Director of NEN, welcomed delegates to NEN’s head office and spoke of the value of International Standards with particular reference to the Oil & Gas Industry.

The Chairman thanked NEN and Shell for organising this meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 (36th) and arranging the excellent venue in such a beautiful city as Delft. He welcomed members to the meeting.

The Chairman discussed the issues over US and European export restrictions specifically relating to the oil & gas industry and the concerns about technology transfer. To clarify the situation as far as this SC 7 meeting is concerned the Chairman read the following statement.

'This ISO/TC 67/SC 7 meeting is concerned with progress and planning activities. If any member is concerned that technical issues not already in the public domain are being raised, they must immediately indicate this to the chairman, and this discussion will be terminated.' The Chairman announced that there would be a dinner in the evening (11 March 2015) organised by Shell. He thanked Andries Otter and Andre van der Stap of Shell for funding the dinner and Francoise deJong of NEN for helping to organise the meeting and dinner events.

2 Roll call of delegates Each delegate introduced themselves and described their area of expertise.

A list of delegates attending the meeting and apologies for absence is given in Annex A.

The attendance sheet is in N 783.

3 Adoption of agenda The revised agenda (N 771) was discussed and approved by delegates.

Document: ISO/TC 67/SC 7/N 782

N 782 Draft report of Delft meeting_March 2015.docx 1 of 22



yakabe


別添 2

It was agreed that presentations on API SC2 strategy and Current Blockage could be made under Item 14. Any Other Business.

4 Appointment of the resolutions drafting panel The following Members were appointed as the Resolutions Drafting Panel:

Paul Frieze (UK), John Stiff (USA), for the English language.

Dominique Delsol (France), for the French language.

5 Report from the Secretary (N 770) The Secretary reported that since the last meeting in Kunming, China, on 25-26 June 2014, there have been the following achievements and milestones:


ISO/NP 10855-1 Offshore containers -- Part 1: Design, manufacture and marking

Moved to active. Still waiting for a DIS-ready draft

ISO/NP 10855-2 Offshore containers -- Part 2: Lifting sets Moved to active. Still waiting for a DIS-ready draft

ISO/NP 10855-3 Offshore containers -- Part 3: Periodic inspection examination and testing

Moved to active. Still waiting for a DIS-ready draft

ISO/NP 19901-1 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 1: Metocean design and operating considerations

Passed DIS ballot on 2014-01-22, FDIS version sent to ISO. FDIS two month ballot to start 2015-04-02.

ISO/NP 19901-2 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria

Waiting for DIS draft. Cancelation 2015-05-03. Track is extended.

ISO 19901-3:2014 (Ed. 2)


Revision passed DIS unanimously 2014-08-29. Published 2014-12-03

ISO/CD 19901-4 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 4: Geotechnical and foundation design considerations

DIS draft sent to ISO, ballot closes on 2015-04-23

ISO/NP 19901-5 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction

Passed DIS 2014-03-05. One negative vote from UK. Waiting for FDIS version. Cancellation date 2015-08-09. Track is 36 months

ISO/PWI 19901-6 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 6: Marine operations

NWIP passed 2014-10-21,but not authorised to begin work as, to date, only four members had nominated experts willing to participate.

ISO/DIS 19901-7:2013


Revision agreed 2013-12-18 waiting for DIS version

ISO/CD 19901-8 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 8: Marine soil Investigations

FDIS passed and standard published by ISO Nov 2014. CEN failed to do parallel vote and now out for UAP closing 2015-07-26.

ISO/CD 19901-9 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 9: Structural integrity management

NWIP approved 2013-02-01. Waiting for first draft. Cancelation 2015-08-01. Track is 36 months.


NWIP agreed 2013-12-18, under revision.


NWIP approved 2014-09-25, under revision.


NWIP agreed 2013-06-27 see N 646. Under revision.

ISO 19905-1:2012 (Ed. 1)


Corrigendum or minor revision will be sent to ISO

ISO/NP 19905-3 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units -- Part 3: Floating units

Waiting for DIS draft. Cancellation 2015-05-03

























5.1 Actions for the Delft meeting 2014 The Secretary reported that there are a number of items for action at the plenary:

1. Decide were the next SC 7 meeting is to be located 2. Decide what to do with ISO/PWI 19901-6

5.2 Members of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 It was reported that there are 23 “P” Participating members of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 as follows:

Country Organisation 1. Argentina IRAM 2. Brazil ABNT 3. Canada SCC 4. China SAC 5. Denmark DS 6. Finland SFS 7. France AFNOR 8. Germany DIN 9. Indonesia BSN 10. Iran ISIRI 11. Italy UNI 12. Japan JISC 13. Kazakhstan KAZMEMST 14. Korea, Republic of KATS 15. Malaysia DSM 16. Netherlands NEN 17. Norway SN 18. Qatar QS 19. Russia GOST R 20. Singapore SPRING SG 21. Spain AENOR 22. UK BSI (Secretariat) 23. USA A N S I

Total 23

It was reported that there are 9 “O” Observing members of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 as follows:

Country/Affiliation Organisation 1. Austria ASI 2. Belgium NBN 3. Egypt EOS 4. India BIS 5. ISO Central Secretariat ISO 6. Poland PKN 7. Romania ASRO 8. Saudi Arabia SASO 9. Serbia ISS 10. South Africa SABS

Total 9 plus ISO CS

Saudi Arabia has moved from P member to O member. For completeness, ISO Central Secretariat is included as an O member.

5.3 Liaison Liaison and other organisations, which are actively participating in the work of ISO/TC 67/SC 7, include:


5.3.1 Liaison with Other Organisations

• IACS - classification • IADC - drilling • IMO • IOGP

5.3.2 Other Technical Committees in liaison with ISO/TC 67/SC 7 are:

• ISO/TC 8 - Ships and marine technology

• ISO/TC 8/SC 4 - Outfitting and deck machinery

• ISO/TC 8/SC 8 - Ship design

• ISO/TC 38 - Textiles

• ISO/TC 71 - Concrete, reinforced concrete and pre-stressed concrete

• ISO/TC 98 - Bases for design of structures

• ISO/TC 104/SC 2 - Freight Containers

• ISO/TC 167 - Steel and aluminium structures

The Chairman thanked BSI for continuing to provide the Secretariat for ISO/TC 67/SC 7.

6 Report of 35th Meeting (Kunming, China) N 735 and N 736 The Secretariat report of the 35th meeting (document N 735) was considered. There was a discussion over some slight differences in the French resolutions. The Chairman said that the English resolutions take precedence.

It was noted that under Item 5.0 the cancellation date for 19905-3 should have read 2015-05-03 and not 2014-05-03.

The report was approved.

Resolution 376 The following items were discussed:

6.1 Actions Under item 7 John Stiff reported that Rachel Hawthorn is now the ANSI expert for SC 7.

It was agreed that all other actions are closed.

7 ISO/TC 67 matters (N 775, N 774) 7.1 Report of TC67 The Chairman reported on the organisation of TC 67 N 775.

The Chairman of ISO/TC 67 Andries Otter gave the ISO/TC 67 report N 774. He and members discussed a number of issues as follows:

• TC 67 had presented to the International Regulators Forum in Cancun, Mexico. • TC 67 target is to publish 35 standards in 2015. • TC 67 has published 178 standards and the work programme contains 100 standards being

developed or revised. • TC 67 is trying to exclude standards activities from trade sanctions. This is currently the

subject of discussions involving ISO and CEN. • TC 67 would like to keep the API and ISO documents aligned. • IOGP remains a valued option to host technical meetings to develop ISO TC 67 Standards. • ISO TMB has created a Task Force to consider the issues around working methods where

sanctions may possibly impact participation and the ISO/liaison organisation interfaces. • A lot of damage is being done to working relationships of years by sanctions. It was noted that

it is allowed to exchange information on basic scientific research. N 782 Draft report of Delft meeting_March 2015.docx 4 of 22








• Canada is not willing to offer visa support to Russians because of sanctions. All ISO meetings that have Russian involvement (P-members) cannot meet in Canada. IOGP meetings discussing ISO Standards that exclude Russian members may still meet in Canada.

• ANSI (USA) has approached US authorities to get clarification or specific licence around Standards sanction issues.

• USA members expressed concern that working under IOGP solution on drafting ISO standards could become a breach of the relevant US sanctions when such a document is delivered by the committee to ISO for ballot or publication.

The next TC 67 Plenary meeting will be hosted by NEN in Delft on 17-18 September 2015.

7.2 ISO Matters (N 761) It was noted that ISO CS have submitted a report for ISO/TC 67/SC 7 (N 761). This covered:

• Elements to be provided when submitting files to ISO/CS • The simplified template • Project Portal updates • The development process including Vienna agreement projects • WG 10 LNG Equipment and Facilities is to become SC 9 under French Secretariat.

Clarification was being sought over the SC 7 and new SC 9 interface on LNG ‘facilities’ and whether this would include hull structure and contained tanks.

8 Report on progress from ISO/TC 67/SC 7 working groups Each WG convenor reported on progress within their WG.

8.1 WG 1 - Convenor Tom Brown 8.1.1 ISO 19900 General requirements - Project Leader Tom Brown (N 758) In the absence of Tom Brown his slides N 758 were presented by Bob Frederking and their contents discussed.

It was agreed that there is a need to further revise ISO 19900 to cover the following items:

– Seek to maintain common basis with API RP 2Gen

– Assess the effect of new edition of ISO 2394

– Implication of ISO 19901-9 SIMs and Life Extension

– Resolve issues as to what is the “limit” in different Limit States

– Clarify and address material for robustness, research strength and related topics.

– Further address issues related to reliability

– Consider the transfer of additional material from the “design” standards to ISO 19900.

A NWIP for the revision of ISO 19900 should be prepared and circulated to SC 7. This should be done in time for a WG 1 meeting in early autumn..

SC 7 requested that Work Group Convenors, when preparing a NWIP Scope of Work, circulate drafts to their WG members for review and agreement prior to formal submission to SC 7 and/or ISO Central Secretariat.

Resolution 379

Action: WG 1 8.2 WG 3 - Convenor Moises Abraham – N 768 Andrea Mangiavacchi gave Moises Abraham's WG 3 presentation N 768. The structure of WG 3 is as follows:







8.2.1 ISO 19901-1 Metocean - Project Leader Don Smith N 768 In the absence of Don Smith, Andrea Mangiavacchi reported for WG 3 on the revision of ISO 19901-1.

The main points are as follows:

ISO/FDIS 19901-1 version was sent to ISO for vote on 10th February 2015

The FDIS ballot expected to start on April 2nd, 2015

USA regional annex removed from the document, as approval to use the new API 2MET document could not be obtained.

USA regional annex has been replaced with “see API RP 2MET” reference.

8.2.2 ISO 19901-2 Seismic - Project Leader Doug Stock N 768 Andrea Mangiavacchi reported on behalf of Doug Stock the convenor for ISO 19901-2.

The TG had its 5th & 6th meetings in October and November 2014, in Houston and London. There were 6+ participants plus some members by teleconference. It is planned to prepare a revised draft version to send out to the panel by mid February 2015 with a view to having a draft ready for IOGP by early April 2015.

With regard to the Annex B Seismic Map Updates, The following steps have been taken:

At the end of February 2015 the convenor received the 1st draft contract from API for 50% mapping work funding.

A funding request has been submitted to OGP, assuming their terms and response can be resolved relatively quickly.

Doug Stock has initiated contract talks with a mapping contractor.

Doug Stock is hoping to resolve the contractual issues and be able to start work April 1 (+/-).

8.2.3 ISO 19901-3 Topsides - Project Leader Chris Morris N 768 In the absence of Chris Morris, Andrea Mangiavacchi reported for WG 3 on the revision of ISO 19901-3.

The 2nd Edition of ISO 19901-3 was published in 2014.

A resolution was agreed to congratulate the ISO 19901-3 TG for the swift and successful publication of 19901-3 second edition. In doing so SC 7 acknowledges the significant support given by ISO CS and the CEN CCMC.

Resolution 377





Chris Morris and Technical Panel currently plan to start work on the 3rd edition in May 2015. A resolution/NWIP will be required if WG3 agree with this further technical update, in such case, the objective could be to publish a third edition in 2017.

8.2.4 ISO 19902 Fixed steel offshore structures – Project Leader Moises Abraham Andrea Mangiavacchi reported on the progress on the revision of ISO 19902. The main items of progress are as follows:

There has been one WG3 Meeting in Houston in September 2014. There were two editing panel meetings in Houston and London in September and December 2014. In addition there was a TP10 meeting in Delft, earlier in the week.

The main issues of progress are as follows:

• Clarification of the intent of the existing text in ISO 19902 Annex A.9.9.3.3. See N 749 which was published in October 2014. A proposal on target Pf in clause A.9.9.3.3 has been discussed.

• Partial Factors Proposal and Discussions • Draft of 2nd edition is 60% complete. Two key items remain:

o Resolution of Materials Technical Panel inputs o Alignment of ISO 19902 and ISO 19901-6 (Marine Operations).

• They have 92 comments to resolve

The next meetings/events are as follows:

ISO 19902 Editing Panel to meet in March and August to incorporate final input from TPs.

ISO 19902 2nd Edition DIS complete by September 2015.

Next WG3 meeting – TBD, Autumn 2015?

– ISO 19902 2nd Edition DIS will be discussed in WG3 meeting.

8.2.5 ISO 19901-9 Structural Integrity Management (SIM) - Project Leader Pat O’Connor N 732 In the absence of Pat O'Connor, Andrea Mangiavacchi reported for WG 3 on the development of ISO 19901-9.

TP 8 has had eight meetings in 2013-2014. The following meetings are planned for 2015: • Houston, March 18th

• Houston, June 4th

• London , late June/ early July, location and time TBD

Updates on the progress of each task group were provided in the presentation as follows:

Task Group (TG) responsibility Update from TG 1 - Data Riaz Khan and Salvador Varg TG 2 - Evaluation Ramsay Fraser and Kaisheng Chen TG 3 - Strategy Justin Bucknell and Abe Nezamian TG 4 - Program Dan Gallagher and ? (need to confirm) TG 5 - Management System Hugh Westlake and Gerhard Ersdal TG 6 - Decommissioning & Re-Use Rudy Hall and Frank Buescher TG 7 - Topsides Doug Angevine and David Galbraith TG 8 - Floating Systems Paul Frieze and Dan Gallagher

The membership list of the TP was discussed. There are more than 100 people involved / want to be kept informed about this work.

Data from the TP will be loaded on the OGP SharePoint Site (https://ogpinterimsolution.sharefile.com/) so it can be accessed by TP members.

The TG sees the SIM process as follows:

• Data Recording what we have. • Evaluation Assessing and prioritizing the risk.




https://ogpinterimsolution.sharefile.com/

• Strategy The plan to manage the risk. • Program Inspection, testing, and repairs.

Some Important Factors for Aging Structures

• Fatigue and Corrosion (Share Data Worldwide?) • Robustness (understand system strength and behavior ?) • Performance Standards (need to define for “fit for purpose” ?) • Performance Standards (need to be applicable worldwide ?) • Topsides (Fixed & Floating), to Include Fabric Maintenance ?

The current project plan shows the following stages:

• First Rough Draft complete by end of March 2015. • Rough Draft to be Circulated to whole SIM committee for Comment • Rough Draft to be Issued to WG3 and SC7 for further Distribution & Comment • Chair to hold Working Meetings with TGs and Individuals to expedite DIS version • First Working Meeting to be held with Evaluation and Strategy TGs , March 17th • Three More SIM Committee Meetings Planned for 2015 (Houston & London) • Need ISO update of “N 749 – Technical Note, Clarification of 19902” • ISO 19901-9 SIM DIS Document to be Complete by end of July 2015

8.3 WG 4 - ISO 19903 Concrete structures - Project Leader Kolbjørn Høyland N 766 Kolbjørn Høyland gave his report N 766.

The NWIP for ISO 19903 was approved on 2014-09-25. The standards is now being revised. WG4 held its first meeting to discuss the revision in Oslo on 25-26 February2015

This was attended by the following members:

Kolbjørn Høyland Norway Dr.techn.Olav Olsen AS Anne Gunn Rike Norway Standard Norge Jameel Khalifa US Exxon Gordon Jackson UK Arup Nick Gillis Canada SNC Lavalin(Partly on telephone) Hou Jinlin China CNOOC Resarch Zou Daobiao China CNOOC Limited Pascal Collet France Total Steinar Leivestad Norway Standard Norge Merete Holmen Murvold Norway Standard Norge

It is planned to have a DIS draft ready towards the end of 2016 with a view to publishing in 2017.

The main objectives of the revision are as follows:

• To take into account the updated version of ISO 19900 General requirements for offshore structures.

• To reflect revisions in other standards in the ISO 19000 series • To update the references • To reflect comments from the Systematic Review. • To take into account the latest revisions of the standards from ISO/TC71/SC3 (Concrete

production and execution of concrete structures).

8.4 WG 5 - Convenor Sathish Balasubramanian - N 772 Sathish Balasubramanian gave his presentation on WG 5 (N 772)

WG 5 met in Houston in September 2014 in conjunction with the Structural reliability conference. In addition, the WG meets by teleconference monthly.

There are two active projects underway as follows (The target publication dates for both standards is 2017):






8.4.1 ISO 19901-7 3rd edition ISO 19901-7 3rd edition - Stationkeeping systems for floating offshore structures and mobile offshore units. - Project leader Alain Ledoux, supported by Renjeev Kurup.

It was noted that there is an increased level of Industry awareness that failure rates on mooring systems are higher than expected. It is important to provide assurance that, when properly used, existing design codes ensure target reliability of moorings.

WG 5 has setup the following Technical panels to review the proposed modifications to the standards:

• Extreme value and dynamic methods panel • Fatigue panel • Geotechnical panel • DP and TAM panel • Integrity panel.

8.4.2 ISO 19904-1 2nd edition ISO 19904-1 2nd edition - Floating offshore structures - Part I. Monohulls, Semi-submersibles and spars - Project leaders: Paul Frieze/Ronaldo Rossi

Technical panels have been created and are working on content and revisions as follows:

• Alignment with 2FPS -introducing a new Clause 19 for assessment of existing structures • Partial Factor Derivation –will need industry engagement to ensure partial action factors are

reflective of operational procedures. • ISO 19900 alignment; Scope of ISO 19904-1 • Vortex-Induced Motions • Seismic Effect on Floaters • Compartmentation/Watertight subdivisions

8.5 WG 6 - Convenor Joar Strømseng 8.5.1 ISO 19901-5 Weight Engineering - Project Leader Joar Strømseng N 762 Lars Gunnar Karlsen presented Joar Strømseng's report N 762.

WG 6 has the following membership:

Country Organisation Status Argentina active Brazil Petrobras, Projemar active Canada WP active China active France Total active Germany passive Italy Eni passive Japan active Netherlands Shell active Norway Aker, Statoil, DNV active Russian Federation passive United Kingdom active USA SBM Marine, Experia Consulting active

WG6 met in Paris in November 2014 and on 14th to 15th January 2014 in Oslo. At these meetings all comments from the DIS ballot were addressed. Some of the comments will be implemented in the FDIS version some will be addressed in the 3rd edition of ISO 19901-5. It is planned to prepare the third edition FDIS draft by May 2015. This is with a view to publication of the second edition in September 2015.

It is planned to start technical work on a new revision of the standard immediately after the 2nd edition is published. This is to take into account comments not addressed in the current version. Some comments at DIS will be addressed in the 3rd edition.




8.6 WG 7 - Convenor Mike Hoyle – N 764, N 767 Mike Hoyle gave his progress report on WG7 (N 764). John Stiff presented his progress report on WG7 panel 53 (N 767).

The 35th WG7 meeting was held in November 2014 in London. The next meetings are planned for May 2015 in Houston and September 2015 in London (in conjunction with the City University Jack-Up Conference which is on 15th & 16th September).

In the report Mike Hoyle thanked all members who have contributed to ISO 19905-1 and ISO 19905-2 over the years.

He also said that WG 7 needs new members in the WG & TP’s, and a succession plan at all levels.

Action: All members 8.6.1 ISO 19905-1 - Site-specific assessment of jack-ups - Project Leader Mike Hoyle Since ISO 19905-1 was published in September 2012 a number of errors have been identified. On 4th June 2014 a corrigenda N 714 was submitted to ISO. In September 2014 ISO requested that this should be submitted as a 'minor revision'. However, ISO want all the bibliographic references updated to exclude clause numbers; present format [A.9.4-n]. WG 7 is not happy about this and requested that the Chairman discuss the issue with ISO.

Action: Chairman The secretary that BSI have agreed to modify the bibliographic references

However, some issues/comments will be carried forward to the next revision and there is a growing list of new/update topics for Rev 1. This includes resolution of the Arctic terminology, WG 7 were unable to reach agreement with WG 8.The plan is to prepare the NWIP for ISO 19905-1 Rev 1 for issue before the 5-year review. WG 7 should have a NWIP ready for Autumn 2016.

Mike Hoyle commented that some of the action items will not progress without funding/corporate prioritisation. This includes:

• Updates on radiation damping for earthquakes. Awaiting input from Adel Younan of ExxonMobil.

• Review adequacy of additional load cases near resonance. Stock/Perry have proposal in with IADC Jack-Up Committee (IJUC) that was updated at Nov. P3 meeting.

• Funding for Jack Templeton to respond to Youhu and UWA regarding their proposed reductions in horizontal and moment capacity.

8.6.2 ISO/TR 19905-2 - SSA of jack-ups: Commentary and Worked Example - Project Leader Mike Hoyle

Mike Hoyle reported that ISO 19905-2 was approved for publication on 2013-04-10 (see N 633). After some delays it was published by ISO in December 2013. The ISO version is dated 2012, to match references in ISO 19905-1, but CEN & BSI have dated their wrappers December 2013.

There has been limited feedback from the document as follows:

• WG7 Convenor identified a figure with incorrect axis label (carried through from SNAME). • User (Hugo, GustoMSC) queried some foundation stiffnesses in the “Go-By” – these should

have been updated; correct values were used in calculations. • Query re simplified calculation of leg-hull connection stiffness

8.6.3 ISO 19905-3 - Site Specific Assessment of MOUs - Project Leader John Stiff - N 767 John Stiff gave a presentation on the development of ISO 19905-3 (see N 767).

He noted that although the panel is part of WG 7 it has strong ties with WG 5 Floating Structures and Stationkeeping.

The main issues with regard to the development of ISO 19905-3 since the SC 7 meeting in Kunming are as follows:

• Good progress was made at the meeting in November 2014 • Significant work has been done outside the meetings incorporating results











• A 2 day ERP meeting resolved most issues • It is planned to hold a FINAL Panel meeting in April 2015 • The DIS version should be ready at end of April 2015 • It is desired to keep the document short (~20 pages) • Decided to be INCLUSIVE rather than EXCLUSIVE for types of Floating Mobile Units • The draft includes example ASOG (activity specific operating guidelines)

With regard to further development of the draft, John Stiff commented that:

• Communications needed between WG7, WG8 & TC67/SC 8 • ISO 19906 and new SC8 documents need to be written/updated with MODUs in mind • Needs resolve issue between WG 5 and WG 7

8.6.4 MOUs Going on and off location Mike Hoyle reported that WG 7 is considering preparing a NWIP for a TR on ' Going on and off location'. There is concern that the current SC 7 standards have too little coverage of the pre-setdown and lift-off phases for jack-ups. WG 7 believes that this cannot be covered within the scope of the current standards/TR. The aim would be to capture the topics to be addressed and the technology to address them. This would be with the objective of providing inputs to the design process and help assess the capabilities of rigs against a common benchmark.

The potential scope / topics covered by this document would be:

• Communications (low hanging fruit)

• Hull in water pinned

• Spudcan engagement and impact

• Hull inclination due to punch-through (hull in and out of water?)

• Leg by leg preloading and practicalities when tidal range is significant

• Hull going back into water with environmental loads

• Hull inclination due to leg pulling (with different numbers of legs free) – perhaps for inclinations of 5 degrees.

• Footprints

• Seabed remediation

• Marine operations – anchors / moorings / use of vessels / planning and timing wrt tides / infrastructure avoidance / etc.

So far 16 members of WG 7 are working on this.

8.7 WG 8 - Convenor Karen Muggeridge - N 759 8.7.1 ISO 19906 Arctic offshore structures - Project Leader Karen Muggeridge N 759 Unfortunately Karen Muggeridge was unable to come to the meeting Bob Frederking gave the presentation on WG 8 (N 759.

WG8 held a two day meeting in Hamburg, Germany hosted by HSVA on June 11-12 2014. Ten countries were represented as well as some technical leaders and the Convenor of SC8 WG4 (Arctic Operations).

An ad-hoc group has evaluated best TP structure for the revision work as follows:

Technical Panel Leader TP0 Coordination/Editing/General Karen Muggeridge TP1 Physical Environment Anne Barker TP2a Reliability & Limit States Adel Younan TP2b Ice actions & Ice Engineering Bob Frederking TP4 Man-made islands & Foundations Ken Been





TP7 Floating structures & Ice Management Costas Makrygiannis

TP meetings were held in January 2015 followed by a WG 8 teleconference on 6 February 2015.

The plan is to complete the technical work on the revision of ISO 19906 by June 2016.

The downturn in the oil and gas industry has caused a depletion in the travel funds for standards work. WG 8 now tries to meet up at associated conferences and by teleconference.

8.8 WG 9 - Convenor Arend van der Marel 8.8.1 ISO 19901-6 Marine operations - Project Leader Arend van der Marel Arend van der Marel gave his presentation N 777.

He reported that WG 9 had prepared a NWIP early in 2014. The ballot result was positive but with a number of concerns raised over the table of contents (e.g. Japan and Norway). However, the Project was not registered and work was not permitted to begin as insufficient expert members had been nominated. The UK commented that they have some agreement with Norway and Japan but wanted to get on with the revision.

Following discussion around resolution of the impasse, Arend van der Marel proposed that WG9 prepare a second revised NWIP for the revision of 19901-6 to be submitted as soon as possible. SC 7 supported the proposal to update ISO 19901-6 Marine Operations under the project leadership of Arend van der Marel. When voting for the NWIP, SC 7 members are reminded to nominate appropriate experts to participate in the new Project.

Resolution 380 Arend van der Marel commented that WG 9 should consider Arctic Operations within the scope of the revision of 19901-6. WG 9 should liaise with SC 8.

The Canadian delegation commented that they have a regional annex, which could be included in the revised ISO 19901-6.

It was noted that some experts (beyond P-member country nominations) already identified, from:

− ExxonMobil

− Shell

− Woodside

− Heerema Marine Contractors

− Boskalis Offshore Marine Services (Incl. Dockwise Marine Transport)

− Allseas

− Aqualis offshore

− Cosco Heavy Transport

8.9 WG 10 - Convenor Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus N 773 Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus gave his presentation N 773.

8.9.1 ISO 19901-4 - Foundations - Project Leader Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus The DIS version of ISO 19901-4 is currently out for ballot starting on 2015-01-22 and closing on 2015-04-23. The FDIS should be issued in September 2015 for publication at the end of 2015 (or early 2016).

Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus discussed whether the FDIS stage could be skipped after DIS and the draft go directly to publication. The Chairman noted that as TC 67 is under the Vienna Agreement and that CEN had yet to allow the FDIS ballot to be skipped (except on an exceptional basis) that this would be unlikely unless there were minimal comments received at DIS.

It was noted that references to ISO 19905 are missing from ISO 19901-4 DIS version.





8.9.2 ISO 19901-8 - Geotechnical Marine Soil Investigation - Project Leader Viggo Karlsen FDIS vote of ISO 19901-8 closed on 2014-08-27. The standard was published on 2014-11-28.

SC 7 congratulated WG 10 and, in particular, Viggo Karlsen the project leader, on the successful publication of ISO 19901-8 Marine Soil Investigations.

Resolution 378

Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus pointed out that the latest published version of ISO 19901-8 is for 'Marine soil investigations (geotechnical surveys)'.

It has been planned that ISO 19901-8 will also include 'Marine site geophysical surveys (seismic surveys)' but yet to be formally confirmed whether this would be in two parts of one Standard or as two separate Standards. This work is ongoing and the current status is as follows:

• Work started by WG10/TP2 in 2010

• WD1 issued in October 2014 (WG10 Delft meeting)

• WG10/TP2 CD expected in 2016 and DIS in 2017

• WG10 target is to have it included into revised 19901-8 in 2018 or 2019

Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus said that although SC7 requested a single standard covering both geotechnical and geophysical surveys (N 437 resolution 259 Beijing, 2008), it was later agreed “to wait until the geophysical text is produced to decide” (N 592 section 8.9.2, Pau, 2012). He asked SC 7 to discuss whether, once the work on 'Marine site geophysical surveys' is complete, it should be added to a revised ISO 19901-8 or made into a separate standard.

The Chairman said the end users need to be considered. This is in terms of whether to have (and pay for) one or two standards. Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus pointed out that ISO 19901-8 defines all parameters needed for both techniques but there were some key members in WG10 who favoured a separate Standard. If separate standards are prepared all parameters will have to be defined in both documents (or a third standard published defining the parameters).

The Chairman noted the SC 7 opinion that a single standard, including both techniques, seemed more appropriate but that Jean-Louis Colliat-Dangus should lead a further discussion within WG10 to try to achieve more of a consensus position from its members. .

8.10 WG 11 - Convenor Dag Steensen 8.10.1 ISO 10855 Parts 1-3 - Offshore Freight Containers - Project Leader Dag Steensen N 779 Dag Steensen gave his report N 779.

ISO TC67/SC7/WG11 has not had any meetings since the SC 7 meeting in Kunming.

The WG 11 drafts are complete as follows:

ISO 10855-1: Offshore container - Design, manufacture and marking

ISO 10855-2: Lifting sets – Design, manufacture and marking

ISO 10855-3: Periodic inspection, examination and testing

The drafts have been submitted to the SC 7 secretary to send to the BSI editors. Once the editing is complete they can go to DIS. Secretary's note: The drafts have been edited by BSI and are now with WG 11.

SC 7 thanked WG 11 for the preparation of working drafts of the three parts of ISO 10855 and agreed that they can be submitted to ISO Central Secretariat for DIS ballot.

Resolution 381

9 Actions 9.1 NWIP The proposed NWIP for ISO 19901-6 have already been discussed and agreed under resolution 380. No other NWI/NWIPs were proposed.






SC 7 requested that Work Group Convenors, when preparing a NWIP Scope of Work, circulate drafts to their WG members for review and agreement prior to formal submission to SC 7 and/or ISO Central Secretariat.

Resolution 379

9.2 Confirmation of convenors This was covered at the Kunming meeting.

10 Review of progress against programme for ISO/TC 67/SC 7 The Chairman presented the current status of the work programme accounting for the updated work items and schedules discussed under agenda Item 8. This is reproduced below.

The main issues in the schedule are shown in the following:

Standard Expected outcome ISO 19900 Published ISO 19901-1 Published ISO 19901-2 DIS May/Jun 2015 ISO 19901-3 Published ISO 19901-4 Out for DIS ISO 19901-5 May 2015 for FDIS ISO 19901-6 NWIP for revision ISO 19901-7 Sept 2015 for DIS ISO 19901-8 Published ISO 19901-9 July 2015 for DIS ISO 19902 September 2015 for DIS ISO 19903 End 2015 for DIS ISO 19904-1 End 2015 for DIS ISO 19905-1 Published minor revision July 2015 ISO/TR 19905-2 published ISO 19905-3 May 2015 for DIS ISO 19906 June 2016 for DIS ISO 10855-1 June 2015 for DIS ISO 10855-2 June 2015 for DIS ISO 10855-3 June 2015 for DIS

The revised project plan, as specified by Chairman, was agreed. The Secretary was asked to attach revised project plan to the minutes. The plan is attached below.


11 Forward strategy for standard development and maintenance The Chairman briefly discussed future strategy of ISO/TC 67/SC 7. The latest version is shown below and is unchanged from that shown at the last SC7 meeting. This will be updated at the end of 2015. The plan is approximately a year behind schedule, which is not surprising given the trade sanction issues which have had a major impact on delivery in many ISO TC 67 committees. Some SC 7 projects are 2 years behind, some one year behind. The table for expectations over the next 10 years is shown below.

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Perform

19900 Gen Reqs 1st 2nd 3rd 0 yrs

19901-1 Met 1st 2nd 3rd

19901-2 Seismic 1st 2nd 3rd

19901-3 Topside 1st 2nd 2nd 3rd + 2ys

19901-4 Found 1st 2nd 3rd

19901-5 Wgt Eng 1st 2nd 3rd

19901-6 Mar Ops 1st 2nd

19901-7 Mooring 1st 2nd 2nd 3rd 4th -2 yrs

19901-8 Mar Soil 1st 1st 2nd -1 yr

19901-9 SIMS 1st

19902 Steel St 1st 2nd 3rd

19903 Conc St 1st 2nd

19904-1 Float St 1st 2nd 3rd

19904-2 TLP 1st 0 yrs

19905-1 Jack-ups 1st 1st 2nd -1 yr

19905-2 JU Com 1st 1st 2nd -1 yr

19905-3 MOUs 1st 2nd

19906 Arctic St 1st 2nd 3rd

10855 Containers 1st

KEY: .

Year

Period of work on a standard up to its next published revision. Numbers in Red = 2010 planned date of publication : Numbers in Black = Actual publication date


12 ISO/TC 67/SC 7 liaisons and other matters 12.1 CEN/TC 12 Materials & Equipment There was no report. It was noted that CEN/TC 12 had met in February 2014.

Gilles Trican has resigned as Chairman, Total no longer supports his chairmanship, AFNOR is currently providing the secretariat on an interim basis.

This means that after April 2015 changes may occur.

Sanctions against Russia impede the work of the committee. 12.2 CEN/TC 250 Structural Eurocodes N 728 The Secretary reported that tenders for programme of revision of the Eurocodes are now being invited. For the highest priority items the timescale is:

• 2016 DIS ready • 2019 FDIS ready • 2020 Earliest publication date for new editions of Eurocodes

12.3 ISO/TC 8 Ships & Marine Technology Alan Spackman was unable to come to the meeting and there was no report submitted for this item.

12.4 ISO/TC 38/WG 21 “Ropes, cordage, slings and netting N 778 Ronaldo Rossi gave his presentation N 778

The committee held meetings on 8-9 September 2014 and 5-6 February 2015. The next meeting is on 28-29 Sept 2015. Some of the relevant standards are as follows:

• ISO/WD TS 17920 'Fibre ropes for station keeping – Aramid'. This WI was approved but Brazil has requested further abrasion tests results from Belgian delegation.

• ISO/CD 18264 – 'Textile slings – Lifting slings for general purpose lifting operations made from fibre ropes – High Modulus Polyethylene (HMPE'. Waiting for approval to go to DIS.

• ISO/NP 17908 “Ships and marine technology – Synthetic fibre ropes for deep sea positioning” • ISO/WD 19336 “Fibre ropes for offshore station keeping – Polyarylate fibre”

12.5 ISO/TC 98 Actions and loading There was no report.

12.6 IADC Drilling (A Spackman) There was no report from Alan Spackman.

12.7 ISO/TC 104/SC 2 Freight Containers. Specific purpose containers (Bill Brassington ISO/TC 104/SC 2 now has a liaison with SC 7. Bill Brassington is the liaison but he was unable to come to the meeting. He had prepared a report introducing ISO/TC 104, see N 763, Dag Steensen gave N 763. This gave an overview of the work of ISO/TC 104.

12.8 IOGP N 786 Alf Reidar gave a presentation on IOGP N 786 (Secretary's note: He also gave this on 13 March 2015). The main points from his presentation are as follows:

• IOGP has 80 members worldwide • It has been managing the temporary ISO solution for 3 years. • Recently the interim solution was replaced by the Standards solution. • Under the Standards solution 25 standards have been processed since March 2014. • IOGP organises the JIP which provides funds to hire consultants to progress work. However,

funds are soon depleted. It is designed to help small companies. • IOGP has organised Offshore Structures Reliability Conferences. One was in Twickenham

stadium, the last one was on Sept 2014 in Houston jointly with API. Next year it should be in Norway.

It was suggested that the Secretary circulate the Standards solution to SC 7. N 782 Draft report of Delft meeting_March 2015.docx 16 of 22








Action: Secretary Secretary's note: The IOGP Standards solution can be access via:

www.iogp.org/PapersPDF/One_pager_OGP_Standards_Solution_March_2014.pdf

12.9 Confirmation of liaisons and nominated The liaisons as discussed above were confirmed.

13 Requirements for subsequent meetings The Canadian delegation reported that SCC has withdrawn their invitation to SC 7 to meet in St Johns in September 2015.

Singapore provisionally offered to host the next meeting the suggested dates were Jan/Feb 2016 subject to support from the SPRING and a venue being funded. In addition, Norway, Brazil and Malaysia also offered to provide venues. The Chairman said that the UK was also a possibility.

SC 7 decided that the 37th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 will provisionally be held in Singapore in January/February 2016 at a venue to be confirmed by the host country, and that the 38th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 will provisionally be held in Norway, possibly in September 2016 in conjunction with next Offshore Structures Reliability Conference. SC 7 thanks Malaysia and Brazil for their provisional offers to host future meetings.

Resolution 382 Secretary's note: The proposed dates are 20-21 January 2016 with 18/19/22 January 2016 reserved for ad-hoc technical meetings.

14 Any other business 14.1 API SC2 Andrea Mangiavacchi gave a presentation on the API SC2 Offshore Structures work and an API Workshop on updates to API RP 2A WSD.

The 2005 API SC2 plan by to align and merge Offshore Structures Standards with ISO 19900 series had now ceased. However, API SC2 and ISO TC 67/SC 7 remain keen to ensure that the design approaches, safety levels and terminology remained consistent, as far as practical, between API and ISO Offshore Structures Standards.

Many US experts on API SC2 also sit on ISO TC 67/SC 7 technical committees. They limit their work to participating within the IOGP solution. However, some US members expressed concerns that even this IOGP route may not provide complete protection against the US trade sanction legislation as, at key milestones, the draft standards are passed to ISO for distribution amongst all SC 7 committee members. This includes circulation to sanctioned countries before open publication of the Standard. This issue would be the subject of more focussed discussion the following day at an IOGP Offshore Structures subcommittee meeting.

14.2 Current Blockage Prof. Paul Taylor, with Prof. Yoo Sang Choo and Dr Harrif Santo, presented the results of collaborative research done in National University of Singapore and University of Oxford on wave-current blockage. Based on the numerical and theoretical studies, and experiments conducted in Cornell University (with Prof. Charles Williamson) and in University of Strathclyde (with Prof. Sandy Day), the significant reduction in environmental loads due to wave-current blockage has direct implications for structural integrity management of offshore structures. The research team organised an Open Day on 9th March in Kelvin Hydrodynamics Laboratory which was attended by an expert group. The research team was invited to contribute towards ISO 19901-9.

15 Approval of resolutions The following resolutions were agreed by ISO TC 67/SC 7:


http://www.iogp.org/PapersPDF/One_pager_OGP_Standards_Solution_March_2014.pdf

1 Resolution 376 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 approves the minutes of the previous meeting N 735 in Kunming in China 2014, amended as shown in the minutes of the current meeting in Delft, March 2015.

2 Resolution 377 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 congratulates WG 3 and, in particular, Chris Morris the project leader, on the successful publication of ISO 19901-3 2nd edition. In doing so, SC 7 acknowledges the significant support given by ISO Central Secretariat and CEN Central Management Centre in achieving this objective.

3 Resolution 378 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 congratulates WG 10 and, in particular, Viggo Karlsen the project leader, on the successful publication of ISO 19901-8 Marine Soil Investigations.

4 Resolution 379 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 requests Work Group Convenors, when preparing a NWIP Scope of Work, to circulate drafts to their WG members for review and agreement prior to formal submission to SC 7 and/or ISO Central Secretariat.

5 Resolution 380 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 supports the proposal to update ISO 19901-6 Marine Operations under the project leadership of Arend van der Marel. SC 7 requests WG 9 and the project leader to prepare and submit a NWIP. When voting for the NWIP, SC 7 members are reminded to nominate appropriate experts to participate in the new Project.

6 Resolution 381 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 thanks WG 11 for the preparation of working drafts of the three parts of ISO 10855 and agrees that they can be submitted to ISO Central Secretariat for DIS ballot.

7 Resolution 382 (Delft, 2015) SC 7 acknowledges that the 37th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 will provisionally be held in Singapore in January/February 2016 at a venue to be confirmed by the host country, and that the 38th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 will provisionally be held in Norway, possibly in September 2016 in conjunction with next Offshore Structures Reliability Conference. SC 7 thanks Malaysia and Brazil for their provisional offers to host future meetings.

16 Closure of meeting The meeting closed at 15:15. The Chairman thanked all participants for their contributions, both during the meeting and in the associated WG meetings and social gatherings. The Chairman thanked NEN and Shell for hosting this meeting of ISO TC 67/SC 7 and the excellent dinner.

Dr Charles Whitlock For the BSI Secretariat of ISO/TC 67/SC 7


ISO/TC 67/SC 7 members outside the NEN offices in Delft


Annex A – Attendees at the ISO/TC 67/SC 7 Delft meeting 11-12 March 2015

The following members attended the meeting:

Name First Name email Company/role Country SC 7 Plenary 11/03/2015

SC 7 Plenary 12/03/2015

Smedley Philip [email protected] BP 1 UK - Chairman X X

Whitlock Charles [email protected] BSI 2 UK - Secretary X X

Portella Ricardo [email protected] Projemar Brazil Rossi Ronaldo [email protected] Petrobas Brazil X X

Frederking Robert [email protected] National Res Council Canada Canada X X

Grant Richard [email protected] Grantec Engineering Consultants Inc. Canada Maes Marc [email protected] Canada X X

Venalainen Jonathan [email protected] CSA Group Canada X X

Hou Jinlin [email protected] CNOOC China X X

Xie Wenhui [email protected] CNOOC China X X

Ye Bin [email protected] CNOOC China X X

Zhong Wenjun [email protected] CNOOC China X X

Andersen Michael Rye [email protected] Ramboll Oil & Gas Denmark Waegter John [email protected] Ramboll Oil & Gas Denmark X X

Birades Michel [email protected] TOTAL France X X

Colliat-Dangus Jean-Louis [email protected] TOTAL France X X

Delsol Dom [email protected] Afnor/BN Petrole France X X

Riska Kai [email protected] Total Sa France X X

Jochmann Peter [email protected]

Hamburgische Schiffbau-Versuchsanstalt GmbH Germany X X

Johansen Alf Reidar [email protected] IOGP IOGP X

Ichimaru Yoshikazu [email protected] INPEX Corporation Japan X X

Shotaro Uto [email protected] National Maritime Research Institute Japan X X

Nichols Nigel [email protected] Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd Malaysia X X

Marel Arend [email protected] Dockwise Shipping BV Netherlands X X

Stap Andre [email protected] Shell Netherlands X X

Ersdal Gerhard [email protected] PSA Norway X

Gunnar Lars [email protected] Statoil Norway X X

Høland Kolbjørn [email protected] Dr. Techn. Olav Olsen AS Norway X
































SC 7 Plenary 12/03/2015

Moxnes Simen [email protected] Statoil ASA Norway Rike Anne Gunn [email protected] Standards Norway Norway X X

Steensen Dag [email protected] DNV GL Norway X

Choo Yoo Sang [email protected] National Univ. Of Singapore Singapore X X

Frieze Paul [email protected] PAFA Consulting Engineers UK X X

Galbraith David [email protected] TWI Ltd UK X X

Gopalakrishnakurup Renjeev [email protected] DNV GL UK Hoyle Mike [email protected]

DNV GL, Noble Denton Marine Assurance and Advisory UK X X

Abraham Moises [email protected] Chevron USA X X

Ku Albert [email protected] Energo Engineering USA Mangiavacchi Andrea [email protected] Experia LLC USA X X

Stiff John [email protected] ABS Consulting USA X X

Turner Ward [email protected] ExxonMobil USA X X

Wisch Dave [email protected] Chevron USA X X

Observers

Clever Bert [email protected] Hansa Hydrocarbons

Dijk [email protected] IHC Hydrohammer

Ent Jan [email protected] Applus RTD

Backer van Ommeren Koen [email protected] Control Union Testing and Inspection

Frank Paul [email protected] NOV

Berghout Remco [email protected] Petrogas Exploration & Production

Teuling Robert [email protected] Iv-Oil & Gas x

NEN/Shell/IOGP

Jong Francoise [email protected] x x

Hofman Jeanettte x


























SC 7 Plenary 12/03/2015

Dakhorst Jarno [email protected] x

Otter Andries [email protected] Chairman ISO/TC67 x

Vugts Jan Shell rtd




WG1 Report for SC7 Meeting Singapore, January 20-21, 2016

Presented by: M. MaesUpdated: January 19, 2016

-off

• NWIP approved December 2015

Motivation for developing a third edition includes:1. strengthening the role of ISO 19900 as an overarching

standard to the SC7 series of Standards2. Identify the most important common themes that need

revision3. Provide more guidance about risk and reliability

• Kick-off meeting January 19 2016, Singapore

2

yakabe


別添 3

WG1 Breakdown of TP’s

Technical Panels:TP1 Limit States & System Effects TP2 Risk, Consequence, and Reliability Classes/TargetsTP3 Uncertainty AssessmentTP4 Lifetime ExtensionAnd unaddressed comments from edition 2 (Convenor, immediate action)

Deferred Items:TP0 Editorial & Harmonization Human factors and quality management (Sept 2016)Short section on risk assessment (Sept 2016)

3

TP1 Limit States & System Effects

• ALS/ULS clarification• Accidental vs. Abnormal• Damaged members• Robustness and system effects, non-

structural robustness• Representative vs. characteristic

Members: Torgeir (lead), Sathish, Kolbjorn, Paul, Mike, Marc

4

ecccccccccccccctttttttttttttttttttttttttssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

TP2 Risk, Consequence, and Reliability Classes/Targets

5

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbiiiiillllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttttttttttttttttyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

TP2 Risk, Consequence, and Reliability Classes/Targets

• L1, L2, L3 (exposure)• Quality Control• Reliability targets• Targets for service life extension

Members: Phil (lead), Michel, Moises, Mike, John W., Dave W., Andrea

TP3 Uncertainty Assessment

• Annex on uncertainty assessment and impact on main Standard

Members: Paul (lead), Sathish, Torgeir, Marc

6

TP4 Lifetime Extension

• Advice on lifetime extension (clause 12.5)

Members: Simen (lead), John W., Dave W., Andrea, Hugh

7

TP0 Editorial & Harmonization

• Harmonization of definitions (with other Standards)

• Harmonization of graphs (hazard curves)• Update existing annex on Reliability• Emphasis on whom Standard is written for

Members: Moises, Phil, Paul,

8

WG1 Timeline

9

Date

TP Leader Teleconference 1 March 2016 TP Leader Teleconference 2 June 2016

Presentation by each TP Leader at IOGP Reliability Conference

September 14-16 2016

WG1 Meeting September 2016

Work Group 3 – Fixed Steel Structures

37th ISO/TC67/SC7 Meeting

Singapore, January 2016

Convenor: Moises Abraham, Chevron

g

Decision from WG3 Meeting

2

One WG3 Meeting – Singapore, January 18th, 2016.

– WG3 endorses submittal of the Draft Industry Standards (DIS) of ISO 19901-9 to IOGP and ISO for balloting.

– WG3 supports handing over the DIS of the 2nd edition of ISO 19902 to the API Task Group (TG19) charged with the development of the 2nd edition of API RP 2A LRFD to ensure content alignment.

yakabe


別添 4

ISO 19901-2 Seismic Design

Revision Project Leader: Douglas Stock, Digital Structures

ISO 19902 Fixed Steel Structures

Revision Project Leader: Moises Abraham, Chevron

Status of ISO 19902 2nd Edition

5

Major Accomplishments:

Two Editing Panel Meetings – Houston and London, July andDecember 2015.– Incorporated revised text proposed by Materials and

Fabrication TP.– Incorporated revised text proposed for Annex on Tubular

Joints.– Removed Marine Operations Clauses (8, 21 and 23).

Because next revision of ISO 19901-6 is unlikely to bepublished at the same time as ISO 19902, a temporaryholding place is needed for these clauses.

Draft of 2nd edition is 80% complete ( 4 weeks of work left).

Work Group 3 – Fixed Steel StructuresNext Steps:

ISO 19902 2nd Edition DIS complete by September 2016.Next WG3 meeting – Norway, September 2016.– ISO 19902 2nd Edition DIS will be discussed in WG3 meeting.

ISO 19901-9 SIM - Status

January 2016SC7 Meeting in Singapore - ISO 19901-9 SIM 7

ISO 19901-9 SIM DIS Document Summary

• Covers all Fixed Offshore Structures and Topsides of all offshoreStructural Forms.

• ISO 19901-9 SIM is aligned with ISO 19900 and API 2GEN exceptfor Exposure Categories. Manned-evacuated” categorization is notused.

• ISO 19901-9 SIM is consistent with API RP 2SIM. Moved away fromExposure Categories because they are miss-leading, complicatedand difficult to be clear for all events and hazards.

• Regional Calibrations are acceptable for considerations of ReducedCriteria and/or use of RSRs. i.e. as per GoM

• ISO 19901-9 SIM has a definition on life extension (or continuedoperation) for existing structures.

• Clarifies Change-in-Use (Assessment Criteria)

• Clarifies Re-Use (New Design Criteria).8January 2016SC7 Meeting in Singapore - ISO 19901-9 SIM

Seismic Panel Status

Douglas StockDouglas StockJanuary 19, 2016

Singapore

Panel Status+ActivitiesPanel Status+Activities• DIS – August 2015 (1st edition 2004)S ugust 0 5 ( ed t o 00 )• 235 Review Comments - November 2015

– 1/3 minor editorial– 1/3 carefully wording revisions– 1/3 technical revision/decision needed

• InfraTerra Annex B Seismic Mapping– Work Started November 2015

1st t f D ft M t t d t l F b 2016– 1st set of Draft Maps – target date early February 2016 –complete world, single, consistent seismic hazard mapping

– Overlaid specific study results (about 70 more refined data) –p y ( )target completion end-of February 2016

– Review and comment from seismic panelP ibl l i l d d d t 2004 i– Possible sample included compared to 2004 version

yakabe


別添 5

Annex B – Sample Seismic Map2004

Draft 2016(values not(values notreviewed or final))

WG4 REPORT FOR SC7 MEETING IN SINGAPORETC67/ SC 7/ WG 4

20-21 JANUARY 2016

Prepared and presented by Kolbjørn Høyland

1

WG 4 MEETINGS LAST YEAR

Kolbjørn Høyland Norway Dr.techn.Olav Olsen ASAnne Gunn Rike Norway Standard NorgeJameel Khalifa US ExxonGordon Jackson UK ArupNick Gillis Canada SNC Lavalin (Partly on telephone)Hou Jinlin China CNOOC ResarchZou Daobiao China CNOOC LimitedPascal Collet France TotalSteinar Leivestad Norway Standard NorgeMerete Holmen Murvold Norway Standard Norge

Kick-off Oslo 25/26 February 2015

WEBEX meeting 14. October 2015 Kolbjørn Høyland Norway Dr.techn.Olav Olsen ASAnne Gunn Rike Norway Standard NorgeJameel Khalifa US ExxonGordon Jackson UK ArupKnut Schrøder Norway NGI

Working meeting London25/25 November 2015 Kolbjørn Høyland Norway Dr.techn.Olav Olsen ASAnne Gunn Rike Norway Standard NorgeJameel Khalifa US ExxonGordon Jackson UK ArupKnut Schrøder Norway NGIPascal Collet France Total

2

yakabe


別添 6

yakabe


EXTRACT FROM NWIP (2014)

Purpose and justification of the proposal:

ISO 19903:2006 is one in the suite of standards for design of offshore structuresdeveloped by TC67/SC7. The standard is the only standard used for design of offshoreconcrete structures so, even though only few concrete offshore structures are built forthe time being, the existence of this standard is essential for the stakeholders. A revisionis due for several reasons:• first of all to reflect the updated version of ISO 19900 General requirements for

offshore structures,• secondly to reflect revisions in other standards in the ISO 1900-series and• thirdly to amend reference to recommended reference standard and• finally to reflect comments that will be received in the upcoming Systematic Review.

See further comments in Annex

3

WG 4 HISTORY4

SPLIT OF EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Clause no. Title No. comments Responsible

1 Scope 3 Kolbjørn Høyland/Anne Gunn Rike

2 Normative references 4 Kolbjørn Høyland/Anne Gunn Rike

3 Terms & definition 10 Kolbjørn Høyland/Anne Gunn Rike

4 Symbols & abbreviated terms 2 Kolbjørn Høyland/Anne Gunn Rike

5 General requirements 27 Jameel Khalifa

6 Action and action effects 56 Gordon Jackson

7 Structural analysis 11 Kolbjørn Høyland/Anne Gunn Rike

8 Concrete works 63 Pascal Collet

9 Foundation design 17 Knut Schrøder

10 Mechanical systems 4 Jameel Khalifa

11 Marine operations and construction afloat 1 All

12 Corrosion control 1 All

13 Topside interface control 5 Jameel Khalifa

14 Inspection and condition monitoring 3 Pascal Collet

15 Assessment of existing structure 1 Pascal Collet

5

MAIN FOCUS AREAS / «HOT TOPICS»

> As ISO 19903 is revised under the Vienna agreement including parallel balloting of the DIS and the FDIS versions in CEN and ISO parallel standards and duplication of requirements in standards must be avoided. It is important for WG4 to contribute to harmonize 19903 and EC2 as good as possible. Of vital importance to have a close dialog with the CEN EC 2 activity.

> Use of “reference standard” for design

> Large editorial/harmonizing effort

Question raised by WG 4 members:

> Why is 19903 limited to “Fixed” concrete structures? (Name of the standard etc..)

6

WG 4 MEETING SCHEDULE7

WG 4 MEETING SCHEDULE8

ISO / TC 67 / SC 7 / WG 4 Proposal for scope update

FLOATING CONCRETE STRUCTURE

Titre de la Présentation – Lieu et Pays – Date Jour Mois Année 2

ISO 19903 ed1 => Floating structure for temporary phases ( clause 5.5.5)20 years of feedback regarding N’Kossa concrete barge and 10 years of Monaco Floating Dike.Arctic and Floating LNG storage projects in the future

Proposal:Change the title of ISO 19903 by remove the word “Fixed”Develop special clauses to address floating concrete barge in operation

yakabe


yakabe


yakabe


別添 7

LNG STORAGE IN CONCRETE OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

Titre de la Présentation – Lieu et Pays – Date Jour Mois Année 3

Floating or fixed concrete structure for LNG storage are already done or on projectProven technology and design

ProposalDevelopp new clauses addressing LNG storage in offshore concrete structure

•

•

•

yakabe


別添 8

part of Aker

© 2009 Aker Solutions

Status January 2016

ISO 19901-5Weight control during engineering and construction

Joar StrømsengWeight Management AdvisorAker Engineering & Technology a.sAker Solutions ASA

© 2009 Aker Solutions part of Aker

Status January 2016

My apologies for not attending this SC7 meetingWG6 meeting conducted in 14th to 15th January 2014 in OsloAll comments from the DIS ballot addressed and commentedBased on discussions in the WG and the extensive number of comments from the DIS ballot, the “easy catches” for this revision of the ISO have been implemented.A listing of topics to be proposed for the next revision of the ISO are included in the FDIS.FDIS ballot opened October 2015 and closed December 2015

to edit this text Slide 2

yakabe


別添 9

© 2009 Aker Solutions part of Aker

Status January 2016

to edit this text Slide 3

FDIS ballot closed on 2015-12-31 with the following result

Expected publication March 2016

Editorial comments received from the following membersNorway 2 comments

© 2009 Aker Solutions part of Akerto edit this text Slide 4

Plan / development of the revision of 19901-5

March-16 Publication of International Standard

Way forward

NWIP for implementation of remaining comments from DIS ballot 2014 to be produced and issued spring 2016


ISO Typical Project Programme

© 2009 Aker Solutions part of Akerto edit this text Slide 6 © 2009 Aker SolutionsSlide 6


Copyright

Copyright of all published material including photographs, drawings and images in this document remains vested in Aker Solutions and third party contributors as appropriate. Accordingly, neither the whole nor any part of this document shall be reproduced in any form nor used in any manner without express prior permission and applicable acknowledgements. No trademark, copyright or other notice shall be altered or removed from any reproduction.


Disclaimer

This Presentation includes and is based, inter alia, on forward-looking information and statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. These statements and this Presentation are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about global economic conditions, the economic conditions of the regions and industries that are major markets for Aker Solutions ASA and Aker Solutions ASA’s (including subsidiaries and affiliates) lines of business. These expectations, estimates and projections are generally identifiable by statements containing words such as “expects”, “believes”, “estimates” or similar expressions. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expectations include, among others, economic and market conditions in the geographic areas and industries that are or will be major markets for Aker Solutions’ businesses, oil prices, market acceptance of new products and services, changes in governmental regulations, interest rates, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and such other factors as may be discussed from time to time in the Presentation. Although Aker Solutions ASA believes that its expectations and the Presentation are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that those expectations will be achieved or that the actual results will be as set out in the Presentation. Aker Solutions ASA is making no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the Presentation, and neither Aker Solutions ASA nor any of its directors, officers or employees will have any liability to you or any other persons resulting from your use.Aker Solutions consists of many legally independent entities, constituting their own separate identities. Aker Solutions is used as the common brand or trade mark for most of these entities. In this presentation we may sometimes use “Aker Solutions”, “we” or “us” when we refer to Aker Solutions companies in general or where no useful purpose is served by identifying any particular Aker Solutions company.

OIL & GAS

ISO TC 67/SC 7/WG 7Progress report to SC7 meeting of 20th/21st January 2016Progress report to SC7 meeting of 20 /21 January 2016

20 January 2016Mike Hoyle, Noble Denton marine services

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 2016 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENERDNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

1

WG7 is responsible for:WG7 is responsible for:

19905 1 Sit S ifi A t (SSA) f bil j k it19905-1 – Site Specific Assessment (SSA) of mobile jack-up units.

19905-2 – Technical Report, including a Go-By (or “detailed examplep , g y ( pcalculation”).

19905 3 SSA for Mobile floaters19905-3 – SSA for Mobile floaters.(P53: Leader John Stiff)

19905-4 ? – Jack-up emplacement and removal at a site

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20162

yakabe


別添 10

Recent WG7 meetingsRecent WG7 meetings

Since last SC7 meeting have held WG7 & associated Panels meetings (some combined)associated Panels meetings (some combined):

37th WG7 meeting, September 2015, London37 WG7 meeting, September 2015, London 36th WG7 meeting, May 2015 in Houston

Previous meeting:35th WG7 meeting, November 2014, London

Future meetings planned for:May 2016 in Houston.November 2016 in Abu Dhabi or Rotterdam

LeT ourneau Super Gorilla XL

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20163

Status of ISO 19905-1 SSA for mobile Jack-UpsSSA for mobile Jack Ups

1st Ed. - Aug 2012 Published (in July 2012)Sept 2012 - 2014: P4 identified some technical glitches.

Doc mented fi es ecei ed in Jan 2013 f om P4 and then e ised inDocumented fixes received in Jan 2013 from P4 and then revised in:May 2013, September 2013 and May 2014.

Corrigenda submitted to ISO in June 2014; in September ISO confirmed we needed to do a minor revision.

2015 Ongoing receipt of typos & other glitches – most minor, but some significant.Ready to submit, but had to revise numbering of bibliographic references to 1–N i e without clause numbers e g [A 9 4-n]references to 1 N, i.e. without clause numbers e.g. [A.9.4 n].Implemented by BSI who made other edits, including new way of referring to defined terms from other ISOs; some glitches. Edited by ISO CS; some glitches.FDIS i d f b ll t 1st O t b ith f th i tiFDIS issued for ballot on 1st October, with a further minor correctionsincluded.Successful ballot. 45 comments – some te or effectively te, so to c/f, inc.:L1 should differ from L2 & GoMex met data (US), HSS column curves & kinematics factors (NO). 2-week final review version returned at end 2015.

15th January 2016 Publication of 2nd Edition

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 2016

15 January 2016 Publication of 2 Edition.

4

Status of ISO 19905-1 SSA for mobile Jack-Ups – Current topicsSSA for mobile Jack Ups Current topics

We have some 19905-1 carry-forwards from 2nd Edition and some list of new/updated topics for 3rd edition. These include:

Interaction with 19900 (delete C & S definitions from 19905-1?).Interaction with 19906 re ice loads/management. We made good progress in the teleconferences held in 2015. Need to close-out.

Update GoMex Annex H.3 for latest metocean data – links to a US comment.

Broadening guidance for TRS areas (need input from GoMex H.3 Annex group).

Resolving the extreme value to use from time domain analysis (following SteveResolving the extreme value to use from time-domain analysis (following Steve Winterstein’s comments that MPME is wrong at the API reliability event in 2014).

Investigation of the additional load-cases near resonance (funded study needed).

G h k h b / l l dGeotech - P4 Task groups have been reviewing/resolving issues including:

– differences between info from UWA and SAGE on differences between Horizontal and Moment capacities for deeply penetrated foundations from older (as used in 19905 1) d t k19905-1) and more recent work.

– calculated or “virtual” foundation capacity to be E.4.

– Addition of guidance for e.g. spudcans founded on sand under soft clay.

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20165


Updating shear area guidance for Chord-sections.

Inclusion of better column curve for high strength tubulars (19902Inclusion of better column curve for high strength tubulars (19902 should lead on this – John Stiff has e-mailed Moises and Nigel). Notethat NO want to revert to “worse” DNV curves. Seems there will also be other 19902 updates to capture.

Investigation of the additional load-cases near resonance (funded study needed).needed).

Earthquake – Present provisions in 19905-1 seem overly-conservative.

N d t b b Gl b l M iti ’ b h ki t d (f d d bNeed to absorb Global Maritime’s benchmarking study (funded byExxonMobil & Shell, summarised in September 2015 CU paper by ABS et al) & find a way forward. It could be that we just need to clarify the existing textexisting text.

– Updates on frequency dependent damping (from Adel Younan).

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20166


Plan is to push on with work for 3rd edition for issue before the 5-year review in 2021.

Full set of meetings planned for Houston during OTC2016 and in the fall in Abu Dhabi or Rotterdam.

Aiming at WD + NWIP at the SC7 meeting after fall 2016 WG7 meeting.Aiming at WD + NWIP at the SC7 meeting after fall 2016 WG7 meeting. BUT … Some of the action items will not progress without funding/corporate prioritisation:

– Updates on radiation damping for earthquakes. Still awaiting input from AdelUpdates on radiation damping for earthquakes. Still awaiting input from Adel Younan of ExxonMobil.

– Review adequacy of additional load cases near resonance. Stock/Perry have proposal in with IADC Jack-Up Committee (IJUC) that was updated at Nov 2014proposal in with IADC Jack Up Committee (IJUC) that was updated at Nov 2014 P3 meeting.

– Funding for Jack Templeton to respond to Youhu and UWA regarding their proposed reductions in horizontal and moment capacity.p p p y

We will need an editorial (ERP) meeting at some stage - funding will be needed for some ERP members.

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20167

Status of ISO/TR 19905-2 Jack-Ups, Commentary and Example CalculationJack Ups, Commentary and Example Calculation

Published December 2013 after lengthy saga to get parallel ISO/CEN approval.

The ISO is dated 2012, to match references in 19905-1, but CEN & BSI have dated their wrappers December 20132013.

Limited feedback so far:– WG7 Convenor identified a figure with

incorrect axis label (carried throughfrom SNAME).

– User (Hugo, GustoMSC) queried some foundation stiffnesses in the “Go By”;foundation stiffnesses in the Go-By ; these should have been updated; correct values were used in calcs.

– Query re simplified calculation of leg-Q y p ghull connection stiffness

Plan to update with 3rd Edition of 19905-1

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20168

Status of ISO/TR 19905-3 SSA for Mobile floaters - Panel 53 – John StiffSSA for Mobile floaters Panel 53 John Stiff

See separate report

P l 53 St t Si J 2016Panel-53_Status_Singapore_Jan_2016.ppsx

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 20169

Status of ISO (/TR??) 19905-4 (?)Emplacement and removal of jack-ups [Going on and off location]Emplacement and removal of jack ups [Going on and off location]

Concerns there is too little proper coverage of the non-elevated phases.

Previous consensus that these cannot be covered in 19905-1 and prefer to keepPrevious consensus that these cannot be covered in 19905-1, and prefer to keep separate from 19901-6.

Present aim: “Capture the topics to be addressed and the technology to address them with theCapture the topics to be addressed and the technology to address them with the objective of providing inputs to the design process – and the ability to assess the capabilities of rigs against a common benchmark.”

Initial membership/participant list of 16 below has grown to more than 50 names andInitial membership/participant list of 16 below has grown to more than 50 names and 25 organisations.

Julian Bowes Marc Dial Mike Dowdy Mark Hayward Hugo Hofstede Mike HoyleRupert Hunt Harold Keys Mike KoenigMicha van der Kraan Dave Lewis Colin Nelson Michael Perry / KFELS Linda Stacey John Stiff Doug Stock

– Good spread; Consultants, Owners, Designers, MWS, Operators, Movers, others– Around 75% of the organizations are US-based.

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201610

Status of ISO (/TR??) 19905-4 (?) – cont.Emplacement and removal of jack-ups [Going on and off location]Emplacement and removal of jack ups [Going on and off location]

The PlanThe initial scope of the Panel will be to define the framework and areas to be addressed. Where

ibl f ll h 19905 3 h f f i i i dpossible, follow the 19905-3 approach of referencing existing documents.Following definition of the framework, the Panel will Develop &/or Source text &/or references to address each of the issues in the framework, leveraging Industry participation/projects/funding (e.g. IADC initiative*) as appropriate.

Where are we?Initiative by IADC to address/support the issue. Agreed core representatives for each industry sector:

Sector Lead Alternate(s)Class Hoyle StiffDesigners Bowes GustoMSC / KFELSMWS Matthews Daniel BraemarMWS Matthews Daniel BraemarOperators C Nelson Shell / N Tears (tbc)Owners Koenig Fairchild / KudskMovers Dial Nowak

Contents list drafted immediately after May meeting. Format:– Normative: The topics to be addressed.– Where applicable, technical “how-to’s” in informative annexes.

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201611

Status of ISO (/TR??) 19905-4 (?) – cont.Emplacement and removal of jack-ups [Going on and off location]Emplacement and removal of jack ups [Going on and off location]

Topics – post May meetingCommunications (low hanging fruit)Exchange of InformationExchange of Information Record keeping [penetrations more/less than predicted & comparison with SSA assumptions] Review of SSA and development of rig-move procedure Marine operations – station keeping (anchors / moorings / DP / etc ) / use of vessels / planning and timing

t tid / i f t t id / f ti / th i d / twrt tides / infrastructure avoidance / forecasting / weather window / etc..Status of the rig (as new / worn guides / inoperable pinions / jetting system… )Competence of key personnel.

Defining the limitations for: [whilst retaining some flexibility]Footprints.Seabed slopes / remediation / etc.Spudcan engagement and impactSpudcan engagement and impact.Hull in water pinned.Hull inclination due to differential leg penetration / punch-through (hull in and out of water?). Recovery?Leg by leg preloading and practicalities when tidal range is significant.Jacking and RPD management.Jacking with preloadHull going back into water with environmental loads.Hull inclination due to leg extraction (with different numbers of legs free)

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201612

Hull inclination due to leg extraction (with different numbers of legs free).

5 Overall considerations 165.1 General 165.2 Planning 165.2.1 Exchange of information 165.2.2 Previous operations and experience in the area 165 2 3 Develop 19905 1 site specific assessment 165.2.3 Develop 19905-1 site specific assessment 165.2.4 Develop basic site specific rig move plan 165.2.5 Defining roles and responsibilities 175.2.6 Contingency plans 175.3 Enactment of the plan 175.3.1 Readiness - "Is everything working as assumed during planning" 175.3.2 "Ensuring critical parameters can be measured reliably e.g. positioning, wave height, period, RPD" 175 3 3 Communication hierarchy 175.3.3 Communication hierarchy 175.3.4 Competence of personnel 175.4 Site specific details 175.4.1 Limitations from 19905-1 site specific assessment (pen, preload, …) 175.4.2 Knowledge of operational limits (rig-crew friendly) 176 Causes and consequences of damage 186.1 General 186 2 Excessive actions and moments in leg between the leg guides 186.2 Excessive actions and moments in leg between the leg guides 186.2.1 Direct causes of excessive actions and moments 186.2.2 Indirect causes of excessive actions and moments 186.3 Excessive rack phase difference (RPD) 186.4 Excessive spudcan loading 186.5 Collision 197 Data to assemble for each site 197 1 Applicability 197.1 Applicability 197.2 Data to be supplied by operator to jack-up owner 207.3 Site and operational data 207.4 Data to be supplied by jack-up owner to operator 207.5 Applicable limits for marine operations at the site 218 Pointers to Annexes that describe the engineering analyses. 218.1 Moving on to location 218 1 1 Stationkeeping 218.1.1 Stationkeeping 218.1.2 Positioning 218.1.3 Seabed obstructions and features 218.1.4 Pinning 218.2 Preloading 218.2.1 Regular 218.2.2 At challenging locations (leg by leg) 218 3 Punch-through recovery 218.3 Punch through recovery 218.4 Jacking to airgap 218.5 Jacking down 228.6 Pulling legs 228.7 Departing location 229 Data gathering and retention 229.1 Compare as-installed with assessed condition 229.2 Information retention 22

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 2016

9.2 Information retention 229.3 Lessons learned 22Annex A (informative) Sample lists and procedures 23Annex B (informative) Detailed calculation methods for determining limiting criteria – Topic 1 24Annex C (informative) Detailed calculation methods for determining limiting criteria – Topic 2 25Bibliography 2613

Status of ISO (/TR??) 19905-4 (?) – cont.Emplacement and removal of jack-ups [Going on and off location]Emplacement and removal of jack ups [Going on and off location]At September meeting:

Agreed initial task groups:Task Group “Exchange of

information”“Communication hierarchy”& “Roles/Responsibilities”

“Competence of personnel” “Causes of damage” “Planning”

Lead Colin Nelson Clint Dunbar Luis Briceno Han Mommaas Jim BrekkeMembers Eric Schnos Alberto Morandi Carol Rainer Lopez Mark Hayward Doug Stock

Micha van der Kraan Mason Melkowits Eric Schnos Qing YuMicha van der Kraan Mason Melkowits Eric Schnos Qing YuWayne Allen Shazzad HossainMike Koenig Dave MenziesNelson Tears Lindita Kellezi[John Stiff?] Michael Perry[Jim Brekke?][Alberto Morandi?]

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201614

Status of ISO (/TR??) 19905-4 (?) – cont.Emplacement and removal of jack-ups [Going on and off location]Emplacement and removal of jack ups [Going on and off location]What next?

Suggestion (intent?) to publish the normative first. ISO, ISO/TR, ISO/TS, IOGP ?

When should we register as a Project?

…. Watch this space.

GSF High Island II after Rita

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201615

Summary / Looking ForwardSummary / Looking Forward

Continue regaining the Technical Panel momentum.

Continue to progress the 19905-1 carry-forwards and new topics for Rev 3.

Aim for 19905-1 Rev 3 for issue before the 5-year review in 2021.

Continue to progress 19905-3 & 19905-4.p g

We need new blood in the WG & TP’s, and a succession plan at all levels.

We need funding in order to pursue some technical issues.

A date for the diary:y

w/c 11th September 2017 (12th/13th ?)City University Jack-Up Conference, London

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201616

And last, but not least ….And last, but not least ….

Thanks to all who have contributed to 19905-1 and 19905-2 over all the years … and to those who continue to do so

Maersk Inspirer – MSC CJ70

and those who are working on 19905-3

...

and those starting to work on 19905-4

KFELS “B-Class”

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201617

The End

Mike [email protected]+44 20 7812 8788+44 77 4779 5443

www.dnvgl.com

+44 77 4779 5443

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

g

BMC JU-200 “Arabdrill 19”LeTourneau Tarzan “Scooter Yeargan”LeT “GSF High Island II”

after Rita

DNV GL © 2013

Ungraded

20 January 201618

Status ReportISO 19905-3

Petroleum and natural gas industries - Site specific assessment of mobile ff h i P 3 Fl i U ioffshore units – Part 3: Floating Units

ISO / TC 67 / SC 7 / WG 7 Panel 53John Stiff

Consultant (with support from ABS)Consultant (with support from ABS)Presented by Mike Hoyle (DNV GL)

20th & 21st January 2016, Singapore

Where the Panel Sits

Part of WG 7 “Site-specific assessment of bil ff h it ” ( t ifi ll tmobile offshore units” (note specifically not

necessarily “Drilling”) , Mike Hoyle, Convenor

Strong ties to WG 5 Floating Structures and g gStationkeeping, Sathish Balasubramanian Convenor

yakabe


別添 11

Apologies from John Stiff

Sorry I am not attendingSorry I am not attendingThanks to Mike for presenting this

Don’t shoot the MessengerDon’t ask too many difficult questions

Overview of Progress N t !Overview of Progress2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Nasty!

Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4A “dark” period of no

Progress

it D

IS

2015SC

7

SC7

SC7

SC7

SC7

m IS

O

10th

Sub

mA

pril

2

Final Panel 53 before DIS

DIS

from

Dec

Finalize Content. Resolve “Boilerplate”

ERP into ISO-SpeakFinal Panel 53 before DIS

First European Panel 53 meeting in Paris with 19901-7

Getting closer to what Panel wants. Ref. IMCA M220

p

Fi t l P l 53 M ti

Revise text and get main format. Require an ASOG

First European Panel 53 meeting in Paris with 19901 7

NWIP Approved with rough working draft of 19905-3

First real Panel 53 Meeting

Editing Review Panel (reminder)

MembersMembersJohn StiffMike Ho leMike HoyleAndrea MangiavacchiB b W lfBob Wolfram

Document Progress since DelftDocument Progress since Delft9th April 2015 - Final Panel 53 meeting before DIS27th A il 2015 S b it D ft DIS t J t IOGP27th April 2015 – Submit Draft DIS to Jarno at IOGP

A few “technical” changes had to be made to correct certain structural problems (e.g. normative text in Scope)p ( g p )Comments Matrix started to record these changes for later reviewComments Matrix also contained some “carry forward”Comments Matrix also contained some carry forwarditems that had not been resolved

Draft DIS entered the “ETERNAL VOID”S t b 2015 M ti f P l 53 i L dSeptember 2015 – Meeting of Panel 53 in London

Present the near-DISTry to resolve some comments raised previously but notTry to resolve some comments raised previously, but notyet resolvedAdd to Comments Matrix

10th D b 2015 DIS f th “VOID”10th December 2015, DIS appears from the “VOID”

Discussion Points OngoingDiscussion Points – Ongoing

A tiArcticAlignment with Jack-UpOngoing discussions with WG8 and SC8 (some draft words have been proposed)

T M bil P d ti EWT tTemporary, Mobile, Production, EWT, etc.Not critical to ISO publicationProbably needs SC7 resolutionSome internal WG 7 Panel 53 resolution, but NOT

fentirely satisfactory

Path ForwardPath Forward

L d S t t DIS t P l 53Leader Sent out DIS to Panel 53DIS to be distributed to US by ANSI (not yet done)Check for diff between ISO DIS vs DIS submitted to ISOCheck for diff. between ISO DIS vs. DIS submitted to ISOUpdate existing Comments Matrix and send to ANSIComments due back to ISO 10th March 2016 (i.e. soon)Panel 53 meeting when Complete Comments Matrix received from ?ANSI?ERP meeting if necessaryERP meeting, if necessarySubmit FDIS towards ?end 2016?

Timing depends on number and timing of commentsg p gPossible DIS to ISO direct, but unlikely (need SC7approval)

Questions?Q

WG8 Report for SC7 Meeting Singapore, January 20-21, 2016

Presented by: K. MuggeridgeUpdated: January16, 2016

-off

• WG8 held kick-off meeting in Hamburg, Germany hosted by HSVA on June 11-12, 2014– 10 Countries represented as well as some technical leaders and

the Convenor of SC8 WG4 (Arctic Operations)

• Karen Muggeridge approved as new Convenor of WG8 at SC7 meeting in Kunming, China, June 2014

2

yakabe


別添 12

• Ad-Hoc Group evaluated best Technical Panel (TP) structure for 19906 revision work

• Register of compiled comments completed• IOGP support for Technical Editor confirmed• TP structure agreed upon• TP Leaders and members selected • Liaisons with SC8, WG4 identified

TP Leaders confirmed technical work will be completed by June 2016

3

• Technical Panel work:– TP technical work initiated January 2015– TP Leaders teleconferences

– June 25, 2015– November 9, 2015– December 7, 2015

TP Leaders confirmed technical work will be completed by June 2016

• WG8 Country Members:– WG8 teleconferences

– February 6, 2015– July 17, 2015 – December 9, 2015

Alignment of WG8 timeline (see slide 7)

4

WG8 Technical Panels

5

Technical Panel Leader

TP0 Coordination/Editing/General Karen Muggeridge TP1 Physical Environment Anne Barker TP2a Reliability and Limit States Adel Younan TP2b Ice Actions and Ice Engineering Bob Frederking TP4 Man-made Islands and Foundations Ken Been TP7 Floating Structures and Ice Management Costas Makrygiannis

Note: All other relevant comments (not covered under TP topics above) to be addressed by TP0 with the help of expert advice.

Technical Panel Issues

• Monitoring other ISO standards to ensure 19906 does not duplicate information– ISO 19906 (Physical Environment section) and ISO 35106 (Data

Requirements). 19906 to specify what data requirements are needed, with the how to acquire it provided in 35106

• Country sanctions have impaired technical work

• Cross TP issues require extra consideration– TP2a Reliability and Limit States and TP7 Floating Structures

and Ice Management guidelines for action factors

6

WG8 Issues

• Travel fund depleted – Due to the downturn in the oil and gas industry, it has been

difficult to obtain additional industry support– Primary communication has been conducted through email and

teleconferences

• Country sanctions have impaired WG/TP standards development work

7

WG8 Timeline

8

Date

Completion of TP technical work June 30, 2016 DIS March 31, 2017

FDIS June 30, 2018 ISO December 31, 2018

TC 67 / SC 7 - WG 9

ISO 19901-6 “Marine operations”

SC7 progress update (Singapore January 20th ~ 22nd, 2016)

Agenda

Introduction“Kick-off meeting” (@ Papendrecht January 18th, 2016)

Technical panel

Standard’s scope

Revision’s Scope of Work

Deliverables (stage 1.)

Deliverables (stage 2.)

Close-out

Side note: Abbreviations will be clarified during the presentation / in supporting documents

22

yakabe


別添 13

Kick-off meeting

This meeting served as the initial kick-off meeting in which the origin, the “working environment” and the envisioned scope of the Standard’s revision was discussed with (potential) Technical panel members

Recommendations on the revision’s scope and requests for clarification were identified by the attendees for further discussion during the WG9 meeting in Singapore.

33

Technical panel(s)

44

Member Countries

Work Group 1 Work Group 2 Work Group 3

Project 1

(ISO Standard)

Project 2

(ISO Standard)

Project 3

(ISO Standard)

Project 4

(ISO Standard)

Technical

Panel 1

Technical

Panel 2

Technical

Panel 5

Technical

Panel 6

Technical

Panel 7

Technical

Panel 3

Technical

Panel 4

Technical panel(s)

WG Convenors may create Technical Panels containing appointed technical experts to supplement the P-member Countries’ nominated representatives.

Technical panels are not subject to ISO procedures and can be set up and managed as the WG Convenor and/or Project Leader specifies.

However, ISO expects technical panels to have a broad range of representation by expertise, nationality and employee so that no group dominates and, again, so that an industry consensus position can be reached and that no stakeholders are disadvantaged.

These panels may mirror the scope of a Standard (e.g. Stationkeeping), or clauses therein (e.g. Actions, Strength, Fatigue, etc).

Required number of Technical panels supporting the revision works will be identified based on endorsed WBS (WG9 meeting held on January 22nd, 2016)

To guide and support the work performed by the Technical panels, an Editorial panel will be established at the same time.

55

Technical panel

Meeting attendees

66

ndees

Standard’s Scope

WG 9 19901-6 “Marine operations”Scope:ISO standard 19901-6 was specifically developed to provide requirements and guidance for the planning, engineering, execution and documentation of Marine operations involving all types of offshore structures, including:

Steel and concrete gravity base structures (GBS);Piled steel structures and compliant towers;Tension leg platforms (TLP);Deep draught floaters (DDF), including spars or deep draught caisson vessels (DDCV);Floating production semi-submersibles (FPSS);Floating production, storage and offloading vessels (FPSO);Other types of floating production systems (FPS);Mobile offshore units (MOU);Topsides and components of any of the above;Subsea templates and similar structures;Gravity, piled, drag embedded and suction or other anchors;Tendon foundations;Associated mooring systems.including modifications of existing structures, (e.g. installation of additional topsides modules and similar.)

This to ensure these operations are conducted in a controlled manner within defined and recognized safety/confidence levels, wherever they are performed and under all circumstances.

This standard is to be consulted during parts of the construction, transportation and installation phases where an offshore structure is exposed to the marine environment.

Additional standards, codes and guidelines are to be taken into account where applicable. Special attention is to be paid to national regulations governing the specific area in which the marine operations are performed.

77

Standard’s Scope

ISO 19901-6 is specifically NOT applicable to the following marine operations:construction activities, e.g. in a fabrication yard onshore, where there is no exposure to the marine environment;drilling, processing and petrochemical activities;routine marine activities during the service life of the structure;drilling from mobile offshore drilling units (MODU);installation of pipelines, flowlines, risers and umbilicals;diving.

88

99


Scope of this revision A revisit of the standard to ensure that the standard:

• Reflects current industry consensus• Is consistent with other ISO/National Standards and supporting rules• Contains state-of-the-art informative guidance and references.

Planning • Revised NWIP approved July 27th, 2015• Call for industry experts to form technical panel January 18th, 2016

(Papendrecht, the Netherlands)• Bi-yearly update meeting with TC67/SC7 January 20th ~ 22nd, 2016

(Singapore, Singapore)• 18 months to produce DIS version January 27th, 2017• 30 months to produce FDIS version January 27th, 2018


110

Start Update

(27-07-2015)

FinishUpdate

(27-07-2018)

Revision process

ISO 19901-6“As is”

ISO 19901-6Revised and issued

Level 1 breakdown


111

Start revision process

FinishRevision process

Define context+

SOW

Review

Gap analyses

Cross reference with other ISO standardsReview 3rd party standards

(COMPANY, CONTRACTOR, MWS, etc standards)Industry

Missing content/guidance in current standardConflicting content/guidance with other standards in current standardOutdated content/guidance in current standard

Relevant background information on ISORelevant guidance documents issued by ISOCopy (WORD file) of ISO 19901-6Identify and allocate resources to Work Packages

Revision of 19901-6

WG9 approval

Approved

Rejected

ISO 19901-6Issued for DIS

Stage 1 - “kick-off meeting”

Stage 2 -define the Scope

Stage 3 – Revise the standard for DIS

SC7 approval

Approved

Rejected

Stage 4 – Revise the standard for FDIS

ISO 19901-6Issued for FDIS

Final SC7approval

Rejected

ISO 19901-6 Rev.1published

Stage 4 – Standard publishedApproved

(and in parallel CEN/TC12)

(and in parallel prEN-ISO)

(and in parallel FprEN-ISO)

(and in parallel CEN/TC12)

(and in parallel EN-ISO 19901-6 Rev. 1)

Level 2 breakdown

Deliverables (Stage 1.)

Stage 1. “Kick-off meeting”WG9 Technical panel meeting - deliverables

• List of attendees

• Proposal for (re-)structure of standard (19901-6 WBS - Proposed changes rev 5.vsd)

• Proposal for content of standard

Post SC7 / WG 9 meeting - deliverables

• Endorsed revised standard structure (19901-6 WBS - Proposed changes rev 5.pdf)

• Short list of participants in Editorial panel

• Meeting invitation to technical panel participants

(Continuation stage 1.)

• Meeting invitation to technical panel participants

(Initiation stage 2.)

112

Deliverables (Stage 2.)

Stage 2. Define the ScopeProject management framework detailing:

Management plan

Confirmed list of participants, including roles and responsibilities (RASCI)

(Based on content of below mentioned Gap analyses.)

Communication plan

Level 3 planning

Gap analyses of:

Standard’s current content vs. required content

Standard’s current content vs. content contained in “other” content

Standard’s content on technology used in industry vs. technology actually in use in industry

113

Close-out

114

ISO TC67/SC7/WG10ISO TC67/SC7/WG10ISO TC67/SC7/WG10 ISO TC67/SC7/WG10 Report on Geotechnical MattersReport on Geotechnical Matters

Jean-Louis COLLIAT-DANGUS (Jan. 2016)Jean Louis COLLIAT DANGUS (Jan. 2016)

ISO TC67/SC7/WG10 – Geotechnical Report – Singapore, Jan. 2016

Geotechnical Work Group WG10Geotechnical Work Group WG10Recent WG10 Meetings

• Houston in May 2015• Nootdorp (Holland) in October 2015• Nootdorp (Holland) in October 2015• Next meeting in Houston in May 2016

Common group ISO SC7/WG10 + API SC2/RG7Common group ISO SC7/WG10 + API SC2/RG7• 40 people in WG10 – RG7 core committee (50% in API RG7 in Houston), involving oil companies (Aramco, BP, Chevron, CNOOC, ExxonMobil, Marathon Petronas Shell Statoil Total Woodside) contractors orMarathon, Petronas, Shell, Statoil, Total, Woodside), contractors or consultants (Cathie, Deltares, Fugro, Golder, InterMoor, Lloyd’s, NGI, Somehsa, Vryhof) and academia (Texas A&M, Imperial College, Univ. of W t A t li ) 80 i di id l i t d t t k lWestern Australia) + 80 individuals associated to task panels• Both standards ISO 19901-4 and API RP 2GEO are developed in parallel for covering geotechnical design issues common to all offshore regions

8 WG10 Task Panels• TP1 Soil Investigations, TP2 Geophysical Site Surveys, TP3 Shallow F d ti TP Pil TP A h & M i TP6 Fl li & Ri

2 ISO TC67/SC7/WG10 – Geotechnical Report – Singapore, Jan. 2016

Foundations, TP4 Piles, TP5 Anchors & Moorings, TP6 Flowlines & Risers, TP7 Jack-Ups & MOUs, TP8 Arctic & Concrete Structures

yakabe


別添 14

WG10 Transverse StandardsWG10 Transverse Standards19900 – General Requirements

• The 5% fractile in Clause 9.3.1 on characteristic values of materials and soils is a matter of debate within WG10is a matter of debate within WG10• New Clause on definition of design properties is required in ISO 19901-4 (must be consistent with Annex D of ISO 2394 on reliability of foundations)



• The 5% fractile in Clause 9.3.1 on characteristic values of materials and soils is a matter of debate within WG10

19902 Fi d St l St t

is a matter of debate within WG10• New Clause on definition of design properties is required in ISO 19901-4 (must be consistent with Annex D of ISO 2394 on reliability of foundations)

19902 – Fixed Steel Structures• Foundation text moved to 19901-4; High level text remaining in 19902• Skirt pile-to-sleeve grouting moving to 19901-6 Marine Operations• Structure re-assessment moving to 19901-9 SIM







19901-7 – Stationkeeping Systems for Floating Structures• Geotechnical design of anchors included in 19901-4; Proposed to keepGeotechnical design of anchors included in 19901 4; Proposed to keep drag anchors and high level text for other types of anchors in 19901-7• WG10/TP5 members involved in geotechnical panel of WG5 for revision of ISO 19901 7 and API RP 2SKISO 19901-7 and API RP 2SK








19905 – Site Assessment for Jack-Ups and MOUs• WG10/TP7 chairman also chairs the geotechnical panel of WG7








19905 – Site Assessment for Jack-Ups and MOUs• WG10/TP7 chairman also chairs the geotechnical panel of WG7


19903 & 19906 – Concrete & Arctic Structures• WG10/TP8 members involved in geotechnical panels of WG4 and WG8

WG10 Standard 19901WG10 Standard 19901--4419901-4 – Geotechnical and Foundation Design

• Revision of 19901-4 launched end 2011 (SC7 Houston meeting) • DIS balloted/commented between 22nd Jan and 22nd April 2015DIS balloted/commented between 22 Jan. and 22 April 2015• About 750 comments received (340 NL, 126 NO, 95 FR, 89 AU, 40 US, 35 CA, 11 DE, 7 BR, 1 RU) in which 50% accepted, 5% partly accepted and 45% rejected the latter mostly for alignment with APIaccepted and 45% rejected, the latter mostly for alignment with API RP 2GEO and for consideration for future revision• Proposed WG10 FDIS sent to BSI-IOGP on 9th October 2015

BSI IOGP dit i d th O t d th N b S t b k t• BSI-IOGP edit received on 20th Oct. and 30th November; Sent back to BSI-IOGP on 8th and 17th December 2015 with ‘final’ corrections• 2-month ballot of FDIS should take place in March-April 2016• Target for standard publication is September 2016


WG10 Standard 19901WG10 Standard 19901--4419901-4 – Geotechnical and Foundation Design

• Revision of 19901-4 launched end 2011 (SC7 Houston meeting) • DIS balloted/commented between 22nd Jan and 22nd April 2015DIS balloted/commented between 22 Jan. and 22 April 2015• About 750 comments received (340 NL, 126 NO, 95 FR, 89 AU, 40 US, 35 CA, 11 DE, 7 BR, 1 RU) in which 50% accepted, 5% partly accepted and 45% rejected the latter mostly for alignment with APIaccepted and 45% rejected, the latter mostly for alignment with API RP 2GEO and for consideration for future revision• Proposed WG10 FDIS sent to BSI-IOGP on 9th October 2015

BSI IOGP dit i d th O t d th N b S t b k t• BSI-IOGP edit received on 20th Oct. and 30th November; Sent back to BSI-IOGP on 8th and 17th December 2015 with ‘final’ corrections• 2-month ballot of FDIS should take place in March-April 2016• Target for standard publication is September 2016

Single Standard addressing all geotechnical issuesF ll f f d i & h f ll f ff h• For all types of foundations & anchors for all types of offshore structures

• Refers to specific structure standards (19902, 19903, 19905, 19901-7 and 19906) for specific issues and SF values


• Will require closer contacts between structural and geotechnical specialists • Will facilitate future revision of various standards

WG10 Standard 19901WG10 Standard 19901--4 4 –– What next ?What next ?Topics considered for future Revision ( 2020)

• Characteristic values of soil properties: Clause 5.3 to be completed p p 5 3 p• Shallow foundations: Move from material factors to resistance factors• Piles: Add new Clause on re-assessment of pile capacity, aiming at providing more details about foundation modelling for ultimate strengthproviding more details about foundation modelling for ultimate strength analysis (ISO 19902 Clauses A.12 & A.24 moving to ISO 19901-9 SIM) • Installation of CPs: Complete Clause 9.12 with hydraulic fracture criteria• Soil-structure interaction for auxiliary subsea structures and flowlines:• Soil-structure interaction for auxiliary subsea structures and flowlines: Split Clause A.10 into normative Main Text and informative Annex; Update current Clause A.10 which dates back to 2007 practice

D i f h f fl ti t t S lit Cl A 11 i t ti• Design of anchors for floating structures: Split Clause A.11 into normative Main Text and informative Annex


WG10 Standard 19901WG10 Standard 19901--4 4 –– What next ?What next ?Topics considered for future Revision ( 2020)

• Characteristic values of soil properties: Clause 5.3 to be completed p p 5 3 p• Shallow foundations: Move from material factors to resistance factors• Piles: Add new Clause on re-assessment of pile capacity, aiming at providing more details about foundation modelling for ultimate strengthproviding more details about foundation modelling for ultimate strength analysis (ISO 19902 Clauses A.12 & A.24 moving to ISO 19901-9 SIM) • Installation of CPs: Complete Clause 9.12 with hydraulic fracture criteria• Soil-structure interaction for auxiliary subsea structures and flowlines:• Soil-structure interaction for auxiliary subsea structures and flowlines: Split Clause A.10 into normative Main Text and informative Annex; Update current Clause A.10 which dates back to 2007 practice

D i f h f fl ti t t S lit Cl A 11 i t ti• Design of anchors for floating structures: Split Clause A.11 into normative Main Text and informative Annex

Alignment with API RP 2GEOAlignment with API RP 2GEO• Current text is aligned as much as possible with API RP 2GEO (facilitated by having ISO SC7/WG10 + API SC2/RG7 acting as a single working group)

i i l d i h dl ibl i h d i f


• Having a single document is hardly possible with LRFD type design for ISO 19901-4 and WSD type design for API RP 2GEO

WG10 Standards 19901WG10 Standards 19901--8819901-8 – Marine Soil Investigations

• Launched in 2007; Updated NWIP accepted end 2011 (SC7 Houston mtg)• Standard published end 2014• TP1 gathers comments on use/practice for future revision


WG10 Standards 19901WG10 Standards 19901--8819901-8 – Marine Soil Investigations

• Launched in 2007; Updated NWIP accepted end 2011 (SC7 Houston mtg)• Standard published end 2014• TP1 gathers comments on use/practice for future revision

19901-8(b) – Marine Geophysical Site Surveys• TP2 launched in 2010 (large majority of geophysicists)• TP2 scope also covers the integration of geophysical and geotechnical dataTP2 scope also covers the integration of geophysical and geotechnical data for integrated geoscience studies• WD1 issued in October 2014 and WD2 in October 2015• Lots of comments raised by WG10 especially about integrated studies• Lots of comments raised by WG10 especially about integrated studies, requiring to re-discuss/agree standard scope for such integrated studies• TP2 NWIP to be submitted to WG10 in May 2016

WG d i i d d i h h i h i l h i l• WG10 decision needed with respect to having geotechnical + geophysical surveys in a single standard or in two separate standards• NWIP to be presented to SC7 end 2016 or early 2017 at the latest


• Target for TP2 CD is end 2017

TC67/SC7 Work PlanTC67/SC7 Work Plan


of 9

ISO TC67/SC7 Offshore Structures - 10 year plan (2010) Objective

The objective of this document to present the strategy for the creation, maintenance and management of ISO Standards within the remit of ISO TC67/SC7 - Offshore Structures, over the coming decade. This document shall be reviewed, amended as considered necessary, and approved on an annual basis by the Chairman’s Advisory Committee.

Philip Smedley, SC7 Chairman, December 2010

Summary of main recommendations:

1. Schedule

A 10-year term plan for the update to ISO 19900 series of Standards in contained herein. More frequent but less comprehensive revisions to Standards No Standard should remain unrevised for a period in excess of 10 years. 2. Visibility and Harmonization

10-year plan owned by SC7 Chairman’s AG and reviewed/reissued annually. Chairman’s AG shall comprise the key Industry/Standards stakeholders. Chairman’s AG should communicate via email or telecom. 3. Management - Personnel

A WG Convenor should not be Project Leader for more than one Standard. Project Leaders should be nominated at the beginning of the process (pre-NWIP) Project Leaders shall be confirmed in the NWIP ballot Project Leaders shall formally terminate their role upon publication of the Standard. Project Leaders should be informally retained or replaced between updates to answer queries. Membership (SC7 and panel technical experts) is unclear and should be specified herein. 4. Management - Process

Early-nominated Project Leader should energise the update process and develop WDs. Following confirmation by NWIP ballot a CD version should be circulated to SC7 members. Approved technical editors shall be named in the Editing Committee. At least one editor should be engaged by the Project prior to ‘DIS-Ready’ phase. Editors should be funded for their direct time and travel in producing ISO Standards. Editing Panel and ISO CS should engage as the Standard approached key milestones. 5. Information Management

The merits of moving some or all information to the ISO portal should be discussed. Brief telecoms involving WG Convenors and Project Leaders should be initiated at 3-4 monthly intervals to discuss process and share learnings. Consideration should be given to initiating newsletters and workshops to raise the profile of ISO 19900 Series of Standards to the industry. 6. Long-term funding

Long-term funding (Doc. N462) is scheduled for discussion at SC7 Meeting in Jan 2011. £70K ($110K) p.a. is provisionally estimated to meet future demand, funded by industry and managed by OGP

yakabe


別添 15

of 9

Background

Since 1991, ISO TC67/SC7 has been primarily focussed on the creation of a suite of internationally recognised standards for the design, fabrication, transportation, installation, operation, reassessment and decommissioning of offshore structures associated with the oil and gas industries (ISO 19900 series of standards, listed below).

Standard Scope 1st Ed. 2nd Ed.

19900 General requirements 2002 2013*

19901-1 Metocean 2005 2012*

19901-2 Seismic 2004

19901-3 Topsides 2010*

19901-4 Foundations 2003

19901-5 Weight control 2003 2013*

19901-6 Marine operations 2009

19901-7 Stationkeeping 2005 2011*

19902 Fixed steel structures 2007

19903 Fixed concrete structures 2006

19904-1 Floating structures (not TLPs) 2006

19905-1 Site-specific assessment of jack-ups 2011*

19905-2 TR Supporting commentary to 19905-1 2011*

19906 Arctic structures 2010*

Note: * Scheduled publication for Standards currently under development

The first editions of these Standards primarily built upon existing National Standards, IMO and Classification Society Rules, industry funded projects, and published technical papers. The process from conception to publication of first edition ISO standards took far longer than envisaged. Creating an internationally acceptable consensus amongst diverse stakeholders largely based on voluntary effort by industry experts had both technical and administrative challenges. The offshore oil and gas industry is a multi-billion dollar industry employing hundreds of thousands of workers around the globe; while safety is paramount, profitability of many operations can be marginal and subject to the volatility of the oil price (Jan 1999 = $17/barrel, July 2008 = $147/barrel). ISO Offshore Structural Standards are also voluminous (large average number of pages), well in excess of most other ISO Standards. Post-2010, the focus of SC7 will move from creation of new Standards towards maintenance of existing Standards, encouraging wider usage of the Standards, and channelling direct experience of their usage back into the Standard’s maintenance process. This shift in focus also coincides with a significant change-out in experienced leadership in SC7. It is essential to maintain confidence of Participating Members and, in particular, those Member countries that are harmonizing national standards with ISO 19900 Standards, that schedules for updating ISO 19900 Standards have visibility, and that the approved publication schedule is achieved. Work to date on four SC7 2nd editions suggests that from initiating the process to publication is likely to take some 5 years with around 3 years to achieve DIS-ready status.

of 9

TC 67 N435 (Rev 8) reports an average period from ‘DIS-ready’ to publication on average of 21 months, suggesting that from NWIP confirmation (AWI) to DIS-ready should be some 15 months to achieve the desired target 36 month publication schedule.

TC 67 N435 (Rev 8) requires a time frame to be specified in the NWIP (typically 36 months; alternatively 24 or 48 months are permissible). For updates to existing Standards to date, SC7 are either missing the NWIP schedule or no NWIP is being created while work progresses up to DIS stage. It is recommended that this situation be improved by:

1. Scheduling more frequent - more targeted updates to these Standards. 2. Ensuring TC67 Management Committee (MC) and SC7 members have visibility of

the planned schedule and early notification of any potential delay with proposals for measures that can mitigate the delay, wherever possible.

3. Initiating work under an SC7 approved Project Leader prior to the formal NWIP ballot and refreshing technical panel(s) associated with the Standard early in the revision process.

4. Providing clear specification for which elements of the Standard should be subject to review/revision and scheduling delivery of each development phase.

5. Enhancing mechanisms for feedback and sharing best practice and dealing with technical comments and queries.

6. Providing long-term funding for editing Standards. The process to meet these recommendations is outlined in the following sections. 1. Schedule

ISO 19900 series Standards can be 600 pages in length. It is an understandable desire to fully review and update Standards in a technically advancing industry where it is perceived that it may be a further decade until the next revision is published. However, full revision to documents of such length is a major challenge often involving technical expertise across a range of disciplines on a voluntary basis.

of 9

Annex A to this document provides the long term plan for the update to ISO 19900 series of Standards*. Initial priorities for text revision within specific standards can be developed. This plan is seen as a supplement to, and not a replacement of, the medium term schedule that is presented at SC7 meetings. * In this issued-for-comment version of this document, the schedule is for illustrative purposes only and has not been reviewed or endorsed by others. No Standard should remain unrevised for a period in excess of 10 years. Even if no normative changes are envisaged it is important for users to have confidence that the Standard reflects current industry consensus, is consistent with other ISO/National Standards and supporting rules, and contains state-of-the-art informative guidance and references. 2. Visibility and Harmonization

Annex A to this document containing the long-term plan shall be reviewed and updated by the SC7 Chairman’s Advisory Group (AG) on an annual basis in consultation with WG Convenors and Project Leaders. The revised document shall be reissued to Member bodies and the TC67 MC with any changes highlighted and commented upon, as considered necessary by the Chairman’s AG. The Chairman’s AG shall comprise the SC7 Chairman, SC7 Secretary, representatives of the industry (e.g. OGP, IADC, etc.) and representatives of member standard bodies, in particular those seeking to harmonise their standards with ISO (e.g. API, CEN, NS/Norsok, CAN/CSA, etc). It is important that other Standards organisations seeking to harmonize with ISO 19900 series Standards ensure that the ISO 19900 long-term plan is visible and agreed by their respective association’s stakeholders. Meetings of the Chairman’s AG are expected to take place via email or telecom, unless otherwise convenient or required. 3. Management - Personnel

SC7 currently has 10 active WGs with between one and four Standards under the responsibility of the respective WG Convenor. In addition to having extensive technical expertise, WG Convenors represent the TC67/SC7 membership and there is an expectation that they will attend SC7 meetings to present and discuss their WG activities. This usually entails having financial support from their respective Companies and/or National Standards bodies. Most WG Convenors have established technical panels of experts to assist in developing the Standard(s) under their responsibility. In some cases the leader of a specific panel has been nominated to be the Project Leader for developing or updating a specific Standard, while in other cases the WG Convenor has taken the role of Project Leader. It has been seen that the demands on any employed individual to progress two or more Standards concurrently, to schedule, without funding, is unrealistic. Funding technical development of Standards is considered unrealistic. Consequently, it is strongly recommended that a WG Convenor should not be Project Leader for more than one Standard.

of 9

It is recommended that a Project Leader for a specific Standard should be nominated at the beginning of the process to update the Standard (i.e. before a Project becomes formalised by ballot). This nomination shall be approved at an SC7 meeting by Resolution. Project Leaders are not expected/funded to attend SC7 meetings but would we welcome to do so. They, or an alternate, will be formally nominated when the NWIP is balloted and their formal role as Project Leader will terminate upon publication of the Standard. The method for dealing with technical queries while a Standard is not under development is discussed in later sections. Feedback from technical experts on SC7 panels is that they feel divorced from the ISO process and, once they have made technical contributions, they are not updated on the Standard’s publication progress and future planning. Consequently, SC7 members are encouraged to dissipate information to industry experts. Whether SC7 leadership should formally engage with technical experts should be discussed at future SC7 meetings. Feedback from TC 67 MC and other SC Secretariat may assist in this discussion. It is somewhat unclear to me at this time who is engaged within each WG as a nominated SC7 representative and as a technical expert. Before producing our SC7 report to the next TC67 parent committee meeting this summer (2010), I would like WG Convenors to produce up-to date membership lists, including SC7 members, and experts on both active and inactive technical panels. These membership lists shall also be appended to future revisions to this document so discipline health can be assessed and knowledge gaps identified. 4. Management - Process

As noted above, the desired approach is for SC7 to have a transparent agreed schedule, with work initiating on a Standard before a Member country initiates a formal NWIP. In accordance with SC7 Resolution 260, the initial task of the early-nominated Project Leader would be to review and refresh associated technical panel(s)’ representatives and, in association with the WG Convenor and existing panel representatives: review comments arising from SC7 members at any previous DIS/FDIS phase; collate new supporting documents; ensure applicability and consistency of cross-references to other ISO 19900 series Standards and other Normative References; and identify any gaps. The scope of the revision should be drafted and would typically include modification to text concerning:

• the scope of the Standard,

• the validity and applicability of normative references,

• consistency across ISO 19900 series Standards,

• informative text and associated bibliography are up to date,

• selected normative Clauses (typically 50% or fewer of the normative content). Following initial revision(s), an NWIP shall be raised that states the agreed scope of the revision, the proposed Project Leader and schedules for meeting development phase milestones. The timing of the NWIP should accord with the long term plan in Annex A and,

of 9

in general, be based on a 36 month schedule to publication (24 months can be specified where minimal updates to normative text are proposed). SC7 Members nominate representatives at NWIP ballot. It is essential that these representatives have a full opportunity to review and contribute to updating the Standard. This will usually be done by issue of a CD version of the Standard either near the beginning of the formal review period or following an initial period of comment to the existing Standard or latest working draft version. It has been found in SC7 that engaging skilled technical editors from within SC7 membership to work directly with the WG Convenor and/or Project Leader 2-3 months prior to the ‘DIS-ready’ milestone enhances the quality of the Standard and helps identify anomalies in the text. The editors remain in the process until publication and have, in some cases, been funded for their direct engagement and costs for travelling. It is recommended that an Editing Committee be formed in accordance with Annex H to TC 67 N435 (Rev 8) and SC7 Resolution 243. This would be managed by the Chairman and populated by persons who have been proven to have provided good ISO Editing experience. Each Project, at the appropriate time, would be expected to engage one or two Editors from this committee to assist in producing the Standard to ISO CS requirements. Funding for this process is discussed in a later section. WG Convenors, Project Leaders and Editing Committee members are strongly encouraged to engage with ISO CS to minimise misunderstandings in both technical matters and scheduling of the Standards’ development and publication. Following publication, the ‘Project’ formally terminates. However, it is at this time that queries from users are most likely to arise. All such queries shall be managed through SC7 Secretariat (BSI), who would normally forward the query to the appropriate WG Convenor and any associated WG Secretariat. Many technical queries will require specialist input from the technical panel but, at present, this panel may have become inactive and without leadership. It is therefore proposed that the Project Leader be asked to remain in-post (although not an official position at this time) to coordinate replies and propose any longer term response to technical queries arising. Where this is not possible, or requires the ‘Project Leader’ to stay in position for several years before work on the next edition re-initiates, an early nomination of an alternate by Resolution at SC7 meeting is proposed. 5. Information Management

TC67/SC7 currently has its own website outside the ISO livelink portal system. The advantage of this website is that it gives access to the wider industry without the need for password access. The site includes information about the structure of the committee and leadership contact details, useful ISO documents, the publication schedule, and links to other websites. There is also a transcription of queries made to ISO Standards, although the tracking mechanism for these queries is limited. The website also relies on the effort of one individual. TC67 MC is encouraging all SC7 under their remit to use the ISO portal. This should contain lists of all members, WG meetings and correspondence relating to the Standards, including queries and background material, e.g. spreadsheets associated with specific Standards. Such a review was specified under SC7 Resolution 207.

of 9

It is recommended that a discussion on the relative merits of the two websites for providing information and document control should be held at a future SC7 meeting. It is stated by some new WG convenors that training for their role is minimal; this may in part have been because most of the SC7 leadership had many years of experience and had a full understanding of the ISO processes. At TC67 level, regular phone meetings are held involving key stakeholders; it has now been decided that SC Chairmen should also be invited to participate in these meetings. In addition, SC Chairmen are invited to a separate social gathering at the TC67 meetings to share learnings. It is recommended that a brief telecom be held every 3-4 months involving WG Convenors and Project Leaders to share learnings and discuss progress and process - this would also meet SC7 Resolution 54 and 215. It may also be of value to meet as a group around the TC67/SC7 meetings to discuss ISO TC67 process and share learnings. Finally, to address the lack of communication with participating technical experts and the wider industry, it may be beneficial to issue a brief newsletter that WG Convenors can circulate throughout their membership and also discuss the potential for workshops to raise the profile of ISO 19900 Series Standard to the industry. 6. Long-term funding

At the 29th SC7 Meeting in London, March 2010, Graham Thomas representing OGP described the funding process that had been used to support editing of some SC7 Standards plus additional approved projects. These funding projects are near complete and new mechanisms will be required to continue with any such arrangements. The then SC7 Chairman, Richard Snell, presented document N462 on potential finding mechanisms going forward and requested review and feedback at the 30th SC7 meeting in Singapore, January 2011. OGP presented a provisional offer to remain as the manager of such funding, with contributions primarily needing to be raised via Operators and other stakeholders. A sum of £70K p.a. was estimated to meet future demand. Pending this discussion, it is considered that this proven mechanism via OGP management would be most likely to provide the quality and timely publication of future SC7 Standards.

of 9

Annex A - Long-term schedule for developing and maintaining TC67/SC7 Standards

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

19900 I N D F 2P I N D F 3P

19901-1 I N D F 2P I N D F 3P I N D

19901-2 I N D F 2P I N D F 2P

19901-3 F 1P I N D F 2P I N D F 3P

19901-4

19901-5 I N D F 2P I N D F 3P

19901-6 F 1P I N D F 2P

19901-7 I DF 2P I N D F 3P I N D F 4P

19901-8 I N D F 1P I N D F 2P

19902 1P I N D F 2P

I

N

D

I

F 3P

N

19903 I N D F 2P

19904-1 I N D F 2P I N D F 3P

19905-1 D F 1P I N D F 2P

19905-2 1P I N D F 2P

19906 F 1P I N D F 2P

Container IN D F 1P I N D F 2P

DRAFT FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY

Key: I Initiate review process N NWIP ballot D Ready for DIS F Ready for FDIS XP Published where X is the edition number, e.g. 2P = Publication of 2nd Edition.

of 9

Annex B - SC7 and Technical Expert Membership by WG

To be added by WG Convenors

N 839 Resolutions from 37th Meeting of ISO.docx Page 1 of 3

Resolutions from 37th Meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7

held at the Singapore Manufacturing Federation, 2985 Jalan Bukit Merah,

Singapore 159457, Singapore

on the 20-21 January 2016

1. Resolution 383 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 approves the report of its meeting N 782 in Delft in Netherlands 2015, amended as shown in the report of the current meeting in Singapore, January 2016. 1. Résolution 383 (Singapore, 2016)

Le SC7 approuve le compte-rendu de la réunion précédente N°782 qui s’est tenue en Hollande à Delft en 2015, en tenant compte des corrections indiquées dans le compte-rendu de la réunion de Singapore Janvier 2016. 2. Resolution 384 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 accepts Tom Brown’s resignation as WG 1 Convener, and thanks him for the important contribution he made in developing ISO 19900 Second Edition and in initiating work on the Third Edition. SC 7 thanks Marc Maes for standing in as WG 1 Interim Convenor at short notice. 2. Résolution 384 (Singapore, 2016)

Le SC7 accepte la démission de Tom BROWN comme Convenor du WG1 et le remercie pour la contribution qu’il a apportée au développement de la seconde Edition de l’ISO 19900 et le lancement de la troisième Edition. Le SC7 remercie Marc MAES pour assurer l’intérim le temps qu’un nouveau Convenor soit nommé. 3. Resolution 385 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 congratulates WG 3 Metocean Technical Panel and, in particular, Don Smith Project Leader, on the successful publication of ISO 19901-1 Second Edition. 3. Résolution 385 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 remercie les membres du WG 3 Metocean Technical Panel et, en particulier Don Smith le chef de projet pour la publication de la seconde Edition de l’ISO 19901-1.

ISO/TC 67/SC 7/N 839 21 January 2016

yakabe


別添 16


4. Resolution 386 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 approves the change in the title of ISO 19903 from “Fixed Concrete Offshore Structures” to “Concrete Offshore Structures”. 4. Résolution 386 (Singapore, 2016)

LE SC 7 approuve le changement de titre de l’ISO 19903 « Structures en mer fixe en béton « pour le nouveau titre « Structures en mer en béton». 5. Resolution 387 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 congratulates WG 7 Site-Specific Assessment of Mobile Offshore Units and, in particular, Mike Hoyle Convener, on the successful publication of ISO 19905-1 Second Edition. 5. Résolution 387 (Singapore, 2016)

Le SC 7 remercie le WG7 Evaluation spécifique au site d unites mobiles en mer et, en particulier , Mike Hoyle Convenor pour la publication de la seconde Edition de l’ISO 19905-1. 6. Resolution 388 (Singapore, 2016)

SC7 requests its Secretary to seek necessary extensions from ISO Central Secretariat to enable completion of DIS 19901-7, DIS 19901-9, DIS 19902 and DIS 19904-1. 6. Résolution 388 (Singapore, 2016)

Le SC7 demande à son secrétaire de trouver une solution auprès du secrétariat général de l’ISO pour permettre de finaliser les DIS 19901-7, DIS 19901-9 DIS 19902 and DIS 19904-1 7. Resolution 389 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 requests its Chairman and its WG Conveners to update the Strategy for ISO/TC 67/SC 7 Offshore Structures Standards including plans for future development of standards and succession planning for Leadership roles.


7. Résolution 389 (Singapore, 2016)

Le SC 7 demande à son Président et aux Convenors des SCs d’actualiser la stratégie de l’ISO/TC67/SC7 « Normes des Structures en mer » en incluant les plans pour les futurs développements des normes et les plans de remplacement des chefs de projets. 8. Resolution 390 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 thanks host NSB SPRING, Singapore Manufacturing Federation, National University Singapore and Keppel Offshore and Marine for their successful organisation of the 37th SC 7 meeting in Singapore. 8. Résolution 390 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 remercie le Bureau National de Normalisation SPRING, Singapore Manufacturing Federation (SMF), National University Singapore (NUS), Keppel Offshore et Marine pour l’excellente organisation et le succès de la réunion de l’ISO TC 67 SC7 . 9. Resolution 391 (Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 acknowledges that the 38th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 will be held in Stavanger, Norway, September 12-13, 2016, at Statoil’s offices in Forus, just prior to the IOGP OSRC, and that the 39th meeting of ISO/TC 67/SC 7 in 2017 will provisionally be held in USA or UK. 9. Résolution 391(Singapore, 2016)

SC 7 confirme que le 38ème plénier de l’ISO/TC67/SC 7 sera organisé à Stavanger en Norvège les 12 et 13 septembre 2016 par Statoil dans leurs bureaux à Forus, juste avant la réunion de l’IOGP OSRC. La 39ème réunion plénière de l’ISO/TC 67/SC 7 est provisoirement prévue à Houston aux Etats Unis ou à Cambridge en Angleterre en 2017.

iso/tc67/sc7 – singapore - jstra.jp 0-16.pdf · natural gas industries - offshore structures ....

Documents