ispod district report - cumberland 10oct04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved.

CUMBERLAND

COUNTY

The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and

Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health

and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program

is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education

groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina.

IsPOD Data Results

Spring 2010

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation

Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved.

Cumberland County

SPARK Training

Staff from Cumberland County began receiving SPARK training in the 2009-2010

school year with the KBR Grant. Cumberland County has 72 K-8 public schools.

Of these 71 schools, 61 schools (or 86%) have received SPARK training. At

these schools, a total of 100 PE teachers and 0 coordinators have been trained

in SPARK. Table 1 shows the Cumberland County K-8 schools that have

received SPARK training and the number of staff trained. FitnessGram Response

Rates are also given for each of the K-8 schools.

Table 1

Cumberland County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARK Training and FitnessGram Response Rates

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2009-2010 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

302 Alma O Easom Elem 274 35% YES 1 NO 0% NA NA

306 Armstrong Elementary 410 64% YES 1 YES 26% 0% NA

308 Ashley Elementary 288 45% NO 0 NO NA 0% NA

310 Loyd E Auman Elem 576 64% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

312 Beaver Dam Elementary 115 49% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

316 Lillian Black Elementary 174 100% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

320 Brentwood Elementary 524 84% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

321 Douglas Byrd Middle 643 76% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

326 Elizabeth Cashwell Elem 744 83% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

332 Eastover Central Elem 456 41% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

336 Anne Chesnutt Middle 677 57% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

338 Cliffdale Elementary 607 71% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

340 College Lakes Elem 438 69% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

342 C Wayne Collier Elem 514 65% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

344 J W Coon Elementary 237 86% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

348 Cumberland Mills Elem 610 71% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

2

Table 1 (continued)



ID School Name


2009-2010 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

352 Cumberland Rd Elem 371 87% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

356 District No 7 Elem 258 45% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

358 Luther Jeralds Middle 552 82% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

360 Hillsboro Street Elem 20 100% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

361 Ferguson-Easley Elem 389 90% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

362 Gray's Creek Middle 856 43% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

363 Glendale Acres Elem 258 54% YES 1 NO 0% NA NA

364 Alderman Road Elem 666 60% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

365 R Max Abbott Middle 891 45% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

366 Howard L Hall Elem 558 49% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

367 Bill Hefner Elementary 837 47% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

368 Hope Mills Middle 738 47% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

369 John R Griffin Middle 1302 37% YES 6 NO NA NA 0%

370 Ed V Baldwin Elem 675 49% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

371 Ireland Drive Middle 329 79% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

372 Lewis Chapel Middle 746 67% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

373 Gallberry Farm Elem 772 51% YES 2 YES 81% 91% NA

375 Gray's Creek Elem 360 NA NO 0 YES 0% 62% NA

380 Long Hill Elementary 503 34% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

382 Lucile Souders Elem 411 79% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

383 Mac Williams Middle 1223 54% YES 5 NO NA NA 0%

385 Mae Rudd Williams 51 100% NO 0 NO NA NA 0%

386 Margaret Willis Elem 308 89% YES 1 YES 0% 100% NA

396 Mary McArthur Elem 476 77% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

397 Melvin Honeycutt Elem 948 44% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

398 E E Miller Elementary 735 53% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

400 Montclair Elementary 473 73% YES 1 YES 0% 88% NA

401 Morganton Road Elem 572 58% YES 1 YES 90% 96% NA

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH


3

Table 1 (continued)



ID School Name


2009-2010 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

402 Manchester Elem 324 83% YES 1 YES 97% 97% NA

404 William H Owen Elem 411 92% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

405 Pauline Jones Elem 167 96% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

406 Pine Forest Middle 935 45% YES 5 NO NA NA 0%

407 Lake Rim Elementary 662 44% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

410 Ponderosa Elementary 409 79% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

411 Reid Ross Classical 737 43% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

412 Raleigh Road Elem 224 36% NO 0 NO 0% NA NA

413 Ramsey MS Alt Prog 88 100% NO 0 NO NA NA 0%

414 Benjamin Martin Elem 600 65% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

415 Rockfish Elementary 807 49% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

416 J W Seabrook Elem 294 69% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

418 71st Classical Mid 530 27% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

425 South View Middle 723 57% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

426 Sherwood Park Elem 594 67% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

428 Spring Lake Middle 421 81% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

430 Stedman Elementary 298 45% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

432 Stedman Primary 152 55% NO 0 NO 0% NA NA

434 Stoney Point Elem 962 24% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

440 Sunnyside Elementary 308 93% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

444 Teresa C Berrien Elem 182 100% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

448 Vanstory Hills Elem 536 35% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

450 Warrenwood Elem 423 80% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

452 Westarea Elementary 501 92% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

454 Westover Middle 655 65% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

456 Alger B Wilkins Elem 229 87% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

459 William T Brown Elem 483 70% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA



4

Cumberland County

FitnessGram Response Rates

In spring 2010, 7 of the Cumberland County K-8 schools, or 10%, conducted

FitnessGram assessments and submitted their data. Table 2 shows the

FitnessGram Response Rates by grade for all Cumberland County K-8 schools

combined.

Table 2

FitnessGram Response Rates

For 7 K-8 Schools in Cumberland County

Grade 2009-2010

Average Daily Membership

FitnessGram Response Rate

Number of FG Student Ids

Percent of ADM

1st 4208 273 6%

2nd 3944 245 6%

3rd 4227 444 11%

4th 4014 416 10%

5th 4075 434 11%

6th 3905 0 0%

7th 4100 0 0%

8th 3752 0 0%



5

Body Mass Index (BMI)

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 56% 57% 937 528 884 500

2nd 55% 57% 1175 642 1209 689

3rd 57% 55% 9670 5556 10075 5558

4th 54% 52% 9624 5227 10103 5260

5th 53% 51% 9396 4961 9857 5043

6th 54% 50% 3528 1893 3550 1785

7th 57% 52% 3315 1897 3149 1644

8th 56% 54% 3174 1780 3321 1802

56%

55% 57%

54%

53%

54% 57%

56%

57%

57%

55%

52%

51%

50%

52%

54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



6

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Cumberland County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 7 K-8 Schools in Cumberland County

Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 64% 57% 129 83 110 63

2nd 64% 56% 97 62 110 55

3rd 58% 58% 220 127 201 117

4th 52% 60% 181 94 217 131

5th 51% 54% 191 97 220 118

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

64%

64%

58%

52%

51%57%

56% 58%

60%

54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



7

PACER

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

4th 95% 61% 6952 6625 7321 4485

5th 82% 58% 6569 5398 6994 4047

6th 77% 54% 1882 1452 1936 1039

7th 68% 50% 1787 1222 1825 906

8th 58% 52% 1774 1036 1908 997

95%

82%

77%

68%

58%61%

58%

54%

50% 52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



8

PACER

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

4th 83% 31% 117 97 139 43

5th 69% 28% 118 81 131 37

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

83%

69%

31%

28%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



9

CURL-UP

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 83% 84% 917 759 879 742

2nd 78% 79% 1260 989 1300 1032

3rd 82% 82% 11285 9254 11683 9544

4th 80% 81% 11221 8954 11729 9512

5th 78% 80% 10865 8483 11370 9152

6th 86% 87% 3857 3316 3895 3373

7th 86% 87% 3477 2978 3427 2990

8th 84% 88% 3402 2869 3448 3029

83%

78% 82%

80%

78%

86%

86%

84%

84%

79% 82%

81%

80% 87%

87%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



10

CURL-UP

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 94% 95% 107 101 96 91

2nd 95% 89% 98 93 99 88

3rd 84% 94% 214 180 196 185

4th 89% 87% 184 164 213 186

5th 75% 83% 189 142 218 182

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

94%

95%

84% 89%

75%

95%

89% 94%

87%

83%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



11

PUSH-UP

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 50% 63% 627 314 592 372

2nd 48% 62% 935 451 924 573

3rd 56% 70% 9157 5163 9527 6638

4th 52% 68% 9129 4713 9510 6475

5th 52% 66% 8900 4642 9309 6117

6th 68% 72% 3092 2093 3165 2272

7th 69% 72% 2768 1912 2742 1984

8th 68% 70% 2696 1830 2811 1965

50%

48%

56%

52%

52%

68%

69%

68%

63%

62%

70%

68%

66% 72%

72%

70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



12

PUSH-UP

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 72% 82% 78 56 73 60

2nd 59% 81% 76 45 73 59

3rd 45% 69% 207 94 191 132

4th 45% 71% 174 79 199 142

5th 53% 63% 170 90 188 119

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

72%

59%

45%

45%

53%

82%

81%

69%

71%

63%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



13

SIT AND REACH

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 66% 64% 702 460 664 423

2nd 68% 66% 922 629 935 618

3rd 70% 69% 6371 4486 6681 4581

4th 69% 65% 6229 4292 6596 4319

5th 62% 62% 6219 3839 6558 4060

6th 58% 58% 2371 1376 2445 1413

7th 66% 65% 2197 1447 2134 1382

8th 66% 67% 2131 1411 2247 1510

66% 68%

70%

69%

62%

58%

66%

66%

64% 66% 69%

65%

62%

58%

65% 67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



14

SIT AND REACH

Cumberland County



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 52% 54% 83 43 76 41

2nd 74% 65% 50 37 51 33

3rd 63% 63% 136 85 134 85

4th 61% 72% 119 73 126 91

5th 44% 61% 129 57 152 92

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

52%

74%

63%

61%

44%

54%

65%

63%

72%

61%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



15

TRUNK LIFT

North Carolina



Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 91% 88% 744 680 746 659

2nd 91% 92% 1063 963 1056 971

3rd 93% 91% 10281 9572 10608 9648

4th 84% 80% 10205 8587 10688 8573

5th 81% 77% 9821 7973 10336 8001

6th 83% 79% 3438 2859 3361 2646

7th 82% 77% 3231 2656 3086 2364

8th 84% 79% 3136 2631 3161 2492

91%

91% 93%

84%

81%

83%

82%

84%88% 92%

91%

80%

77%

79%

77%

79%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male



16

TRUNK LIFT

Cumberland County


FitnessGram Results for 7 K-8 School in Cumberland County

Grade


Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results


N in HFZ

1st 71% 55% 94 67 87 48

2nd 77% 74% 88 68 81 60

3rd 84% 86% 214 179 197 170

4th 71% 75% 184 130 217 163

5th 69% 68% 190 131 219 150

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

71% 77% 84%

71%

69%

55%

74%

86%

75%

68%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

ispod district report - cumberland 10oct04

Documents