issus with the definition of unconscious thought in unconscious thought theory
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1
ISSUES WITH THE DEFINITION OF ‘UNCONSCIOUS THOUGHT’ IN UNCONSCIOUS THOUGHT THEORY
Sumitava Mukherjee1 & Narayanan Srinivasan2
1 IIT Gandhinagar, India2CBCS, University of Allahabad, India
[email protected] , [email protected]
20th Conference on Towards a Science of Consciousness
2
Overview of this talk
The classical understanding of ‘unconscious thought’
Recent backdrop and empirical findings of deliberation-without-attention
Introduction to Unconscious Thought Theory (UTT)
Examining the core assumptions of UTT Unlimited capacity/Weighting or Sub-sampling?
Nature of “unconscious thought” Re-think the way unconscious thought is
defined in UTT
3
Dual systems of thought
Intuition vs Deliberation (e.g., Kahneman, 2011)
Which is better? When?
– old research says intuition better for easy/learned associations but newer research says it is better for complex real life problems
4
Unconscious cognition
Psychological unconscious – mental structures/processes that influence a person’s experience, thought and action OUTSIDE of conscious awareness (Kihlstrom, 1987).
Conscious perception or action is based on unconscious/implicit/subliminal/automatized information (Hemholtz, Freud, Kihlstrom).
Inacsessible to introspection and knowable only by inference
Has historically implied a dis-connection with attention
5
Different views of the ‘unconscious’ Waste-basket: un-attended percepts and un-
rehersed memories that are subsequently lost Substantial pre-conscious: Processes involved in
early stages like feature detection, pattern recognition
[Both make virtually no contact with “higher” processes]
Automatic: Highly complex behavior but outside awareness (Bargh & Chartland, 1999)
Powerful unconscious: Unconscious alone and by itself solves complex problems (Dijksterhuis and colleagues)
6
A bold claim…
When faced with a complex decision, stop thinking (Dijksterhuis et al., 2006).
Explicit consideration of options and attributes overwhelms our limited capacity conscious.
The unconscious has unlimited capacity and can therefore weigh information appropriately and decide optimally.
Unconscious is capable of performing tasks/calculations outside of consciousness
In case of complex multi-attribute decisions, distracting away from the problem (unconscious thought) results in better decisions.
7
The deliberation-without-attention effect: an evidence of a superior unconscious?
Dijksterhuis et al. (2006). Science, 311, 1005-1007.
FAILED REPLICATIONS !
8
The Unconscious Thought Theory (UTT)
Unconscious cognition is just not suitable for simple feats (Greenwald, 1992), but the unconscious is powerful, without capacity limitations, which uses a bottom-up processing style, appropriately weights the relative importance for attributes in decision, engages in associative processing and divergent thinking.
9
“Unconscious Thought” Principle in UTT
The Unconscious Thought Principle asserts the existence and nature of two kinds of thought: conscious and unconscious. Conscious thought is defined as “object-relevant or task-relevant cognitive or affective thought processes that occur while the object or task is the focus of one’s unconscious attention,” while unconscious thought simply occurs when the object or task is outside of attention (Dijksterhuis & Nordgren, 2006).
10
Our concerns with UTT
Core assumptions of UTT Unlimited capacity & Optimal weighting
principle Our proposal – a sub-sampling heuristic
The usage of attention to operationalize Unconscious Thought – re-look at the definition.
11
Unlimited capacity or Sub-sampling
(a)Prob. Sampling + WADD
(b)Prob. Sampling + TALLY
(c) Random Sampling + WADD
(d)Random Sampling + TALLY
Srinivasan & Mukherjee, 2010
12
Unlimited capacity or Subsampling
13
Unlimited capacity or Subsampling Sub-sampling (Mukherjee & Srinivasan, 2013) can
lead to decently correct choices - there is no need to posit an infinite capacity for unconscious thought.
There is accordingly no convincing data which suggest that unconscious thought results in optimal weighting.
Infact UTT studies haven’t really looked into how much information is processed and how.
Both during conscious and unconscious thought, they may focus on a small set of important attributes to arrive at a decent decision.
14
Operationalizing Unconscious Thought
Unconscious thought is “object relevant or task relevant cognitive or affective thought processes that occur while attention is directed elsewhere” (Dijsksterhuis & Nordgen, 2006)
Treats attention as a resource which is absent[present]
How attention operates? Attention cannot be treated as a unitary
mechanism – Scope of attention?
15
Attentional mechanisms during Unconscious Thought
1
•Information for 4 cell phones each having 12 attributes were presented
2
•Distracter task [Global or Local at low or high working memory load]
3
•Choice & memory
Srinivasan, N., Mukherjee, S., Mishra, M. V., & Kesarwani, S. (2013)
16
Global vs Local letters examples
Global S Local S
17
Differences in attentional mechanisms during Unconscious Thought
Main effect of scope:F(1, 76)= 11.8, p < .01
Effect of load (p=.117) and interaction between load and scope (p=.794) was not significantSrinivasan et al., 2013
18
Differences in attentional mechanisms during Unconscious Thought
Main effect of scope:F(1, 76)=6.47, p = .01.
Effect of load (p=.8) was not significant but and interaction was marginally significant (p=.058) Srinivasan et al., 2013
19
Re-thinking the ‘Unconscious Thought’
Attentional mechanisms during unconscious thought have profound effects (Srinivasan & Mukherjee, in press)
Scope of attention affects many higher order cognitive processes including complex decision making
Unconscious thought cannot be defined using attention when attentional mechanisms themselves can affect ‘unconscious thought’
20
Conclusions
A need for a proper treatment of attention In general theorizing about effects of
conscious vs unconscious processes is critically dependent on a proper treatment of attention.
Conflating both attention and consciousness would add more confusion to the issue of unconscious thought in particular and the link between attention and consciousness in general
21
Conclusions
The UTT paradigm is not an adequate method to measure beneficial unconscious thought (if at all there is; Shanks & Newell, in press)
The putative ‘unconscious thought’ is constrained by differences in attentional processes employed during unconscious thought (or is it distracted conscious thought?) and to differences in selection of information (Srinivasan & Mukherjee, in press).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D.R. (in press). Unconscious Influences on
Decision Making: A Critical Review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Srinivasan, N. & Mukherjee, S. (in press). Even 'unconscious thought' is influenced by attentional mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. (Commentary).
22
References
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American psychologist, 54, 462.
Dijksterhuis, A. & Nordgren, L.F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 95–109.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M.W., Nordgren, L.F., van Baaren, R.B. (2006). On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science 311, 1005–1007.
Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47(6), 766.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237, 1445-1452. Mukherjee, S. & Srinivasan, N. (2013). Attention in preferential choice.
Progress in Brain Research, 202, 117-134. Srinivasan, N., Mukherjee, S., Mishra, M. V., & Kesarwani, S. (2013).
Evaluating the role of attention in the context of unconscious thought theory: Differential impact of attentional scope and load on preference and memory. Frontiers in Psychology 4:37. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00037
Srinivasan, N., & Mukherjee, S. (2010). Attribute preference and selection in multi-attribute decision making: Implications for unconscious and conscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 644 - 652.