iteea 2015 dr. thomas loveland university of maryland eastern shore

28
ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Upload: ginger-hood

Post on 17-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

ITEEA 2015

Dr. Thomas Loveland

University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Page 2: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

What is Literacy? When individuals seek thoughtful

engagement that has breadth and depth, based on high-quality literary and informational texts.

Literacy builds knowledge, enlarges experience, and broadens one’s worldviews.

Page 3: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Literate individuals… Demonstrate strong content knowledge. Think independently. Can respond to demands of audience,

task, purpose and career field. Comprehend deeply and critique what one

is reading. Capably and strategically utilizes

educational technologies and media. Values evidence over opinion. Understand other perspectives & cultures.

Page 4: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Maryland College and Career Readiness Standards

Aligned with college and career expectations.

Based on Common Core State Standards.

Rigorous standards with critical thinking and problem-solving skills at the highest level.

Page 5: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Disciplinary Literacy Goals in Technology & Engineering Increase student abilities to develop

knowledge from content-rich, non-fiction (informational) text.

Ground reading, writing and oral communication on literary and informational text.

Provide sustained practice with complex text.

Be able to read and speak like an expert in the field.

Page 6: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Change in Reading Focus Past: industrial arts shops teaching tool

skills. Important to be able to read to identify tool parts, safety documents.

Now: 21st learning centers teaching design, critical thinking, STEM, and problem solving.

New role of technology education in supporting academic standards, and college and career readiness.

Page 7: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Role of Technology and Engineering Education

One goal of Common Core ELA is for students to develop deeper comprehension from reading within technical disciplines (Meeder, et al, 2012).

Students can develop literacies better in technology education due to hands-on, project-based applications based in authentic world of work (Lacivita, 2006).

Page 8: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Disciplinary Literacy or Reading in the Content Area? Reading in the Content Area: Traditional

focus on increasing reading abilities of lowest level readers in technical field.

Disciplinary literacy: Use of high expectations and discipline-specific practices to access, apply and communicate content knowledge.

Page 9: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Technology and Engineering Education Language used in field is more technical in

nature. Specialized ways of thinking, terminology,

types of texts to comprehend and utilize as resources, and ways to effectively communicate.

Important for TEE teachers to develop robust instruction around disciplinary specific literacy skills. (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), 2014)

Page 10: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Reading

Purpose is to construct meaning, comprehend and respond actively to what is read.

The process of constructing meaning is through a) prerequisite knowledge, b) the information to be read and c) context of reading situation. (Wixson & Peters, 1987)

“Ability to identify and decode words and sentences”.

Page 11: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Reading Problems in Technical Education (Lacivita, 2006) Complex terminology of field. Inability to locate main ideas

in text. Difficulty in sequencing the

procedure steps of a process. Learning trade-specific

vocabulary. Comprehension of text after

reading.

Page 12: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Enhancing Reading Skills Problem-based learning through design briefs and

engineering challenges. Includes reading of context, objectives, criteria and

constraints, resources and assessment information. Student organization competitions with complex

and prescriptive event manuals. Communicative competence developed through

reading of everyday materials like transportation schedules, published articles, and websites. (National Capital Language Resource Center, 2014)

Page 13: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Reading Implied in the Standards for Technological Literacy STL 2-Z: Select resources STL 2-AA: Identify criteria and constraints STL 10-I: Conduct research and development

modeled on read business practices STL 10-J: Research technological problems STL 12-L: Document processes and

procedures to communicate in oral and written form

STL 12-M: Diagnose malfunctioning systems STL 12-P: Use computers to retrieve, interpret

and evaluate data and information

Page 14: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

ELA Standards for Science and Technical Subjects 6-12 (CCSS) Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and

technical texts, attending to the precise details of explanations or descriptions. (RST 9-10.1)

Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; trace the text's explanation or depiction of a complex process, phenomenon, or concept; provide an accurate summary of the text. (RST.9-10.2)

Follow precisely a complex multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks, attending to special cases or exceptions defined in the text. (RST.9-10.3)

Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 9-10 texts and topics in technology education. (RST.9-10.4)

Analyze the structure of the relationships among concepts in a text, including relationships among key terms (e.g., force, friction, reaction force, energy). (RST.9-10.5)

Page 15: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

ELA Standards for Science and Technical Subjects 6-12 (CCSS) Analyze the author's purpose in providing an explanation,

describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text, defining the question the author seeks to address. (RST.9-10.6)

Translate quantitative or technical information expressed in words in a text into visual form (e.g., a table or chart) and translate information expressed visually or mathematically (e.g., in an equation) into words. (RST.9-10.7)

Assess the extent to which the reasoning and evidence in a text support the author's claim or a recommendation for solving a scientific or technical problem. (RST.9-10.8)

Compare and contrast findings presented in a text to those from other sources (including their own experiments), noting when the findings support or contradict previous explanations or accounts. (RST.9-10.9)

By the end of grade 10, read and comprehend science/technical texts in the grades 9-10 text complexity band independently and proficiently. (RST.9-10.10)

Page 16: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Textual Complexity “The inherent difficulty of reading and

comprehending a text combined with consideration of reader and task variables”.

It takes skill, concentration, and stamina to read complex text.

If successful, students can better understand nuance, subtlety, depth and breadth of ideas read.

Three ways to measure text readability to assist technology teachers in determining whether students can read and understand resources.

Page 17: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Qualitative Measures

First Two of Four ElementsLevels of meaning or purpose set by author.

Technical text may be straightforward but article on fracking could include underlying meaning.

Text Structure: Organizational patterns like problem-solution, chronological order, cause and effect, compare and contrast. Complex and unconventional text structures include signal words and complex graphics.

Page 18: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Qualitative Measures

Last Two of Four ElementsKnowledge Demands: Assumptions made

about reader’s life experiences, cultural literacy and content knowledge.

Language Conventionality and Clarity: Based on sentence structure and vocabulary. Complex text includes longer sentences with multiple phrases, compound word order, and stronger academic and discipline-specific words.

Page 19: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Qualitative Measures Four elements assessed by Qualitative Dimensions of Text

Complexity Rubric for Science and Technical Subjects 6-12. Issue: Time to assess in this manner.

Page 20: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Quantitative Measures Lexile Flesch-Kincaid ETS Source Rater ATOS Analyzer Questar Degrees of Reading Power Pearson Reading Maturity

Technology teacher can copy and paste text into instrument for reading grade level.

Page 21: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Readability Analysis in Microsoft Word Highlight selected text Review Tab – Spelling and

Grammar Options – “Show readability

statistics” Text complexity displayed

for Flesch-Kincaid. Example is at graduate level (18.2)

This method is easiest for busy teacher.

Page 22: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Reader Task Considerations Third method of determining text complexity

is by teacher reflection. Teacher makes professional judgment on

student cognitive capabilities, reading skills, motivations, interests, and the complexity and cognitive demands of task given to student.

Cognitive demand example: industry certification test written for experts in field.

Page 23: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Implications for Instruction in Technology and Engineering Education To help students meet

expectations in PARCC, TEE teachers should select text with high cognitive demand.

Encourage close analytic reading of technical text for evidence.

Expectations of all students to exhibit appropriate disciplinary literacy: use and communicate terminology of field like an expert technologist.

Page 24: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Text-Dependent QuestioningText dependent questions force students to use text to solve problem. When writing text dependent questions, technology and engineering teachers should consider the following:

Identify core understandings and key ideas of the text.Develop opening questions to orient students to the text.Use complex academic words and text structures connected to key ideas.Write questions related to the toughest sections of the text, thereby presenting the greatest difficulty to readers for comprehension.Sequence questions from easiest to hardest to promote deep analysis.Identify which CCSS standards are in alignment with the questions.

(Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2014)

Page 25: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Other Strategies Reciprocal teaching: Ask students to predict what

a reading is about, clarify through discussion, and summarize reading.

Scaffolding: Students predict content from looking at headers, graphs, pictures, and introductions.

Journaling: Students collect data from text and analyze the meaning within a structured activity.

Page 26: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Technology Education Specific Strategies (Rust, 2012)

Students give multimedia presentations

Conduct Internet research Expose students to technical

reading Require student-produced

documentation for projects Data analysis for engineering

designs Vocabulary building in Technology

and Engineering Education

Page 27: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

PARCC ELA Assessments

Three tasks: Research Simulation, Literary Analysis, and Narrative Task.

How can Technology and Engineering Technology help prepare students for PARCC ELA?

Page 28: ITEEA 2015 Dr. Thomas Loveland University of Maryland Eastern Shore

Question & Answers

Thank you for your participation. Any post-conference questions may be directed to

Dr. Tom Loveland

[email protected]