item 1.1 - all federal funds received · section 1. sources and amounts of funds and resources...
TRANSCRIPT
* - Required field
Administrative Data
Section 1. Sources and Amounts of Funds and ResourcesSections 704(c) and 704(m)(3) and (4) of the Act
Item 1.1 - All Federal Funds Received
Type of Funds Amount
(A) Title VII, Ch. 1, Part B* 515680
(B) Title VII, Ch. 1, Part C-For 723
states Only*
0
(C) Title VII, Ch. 2 * 0
(D) Other Federal Funds* 332469
Item 1.2 - Other Government Funds
Type of Funds Amount
(E) State Government Funds* 1120350
(F) Local Government Funds* 39673
Page 1 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Item 1.3 - Private Resources
Type of Funds Amount
(G) Fees for Service (program
income, etc.)*
695261
(H) Other resources * 239798
Item 1.4 - Total Income
Type of Funds Amount
Total income = 2943231
Item 1.5 - Pass-Through Funds
Type of Funds Amount
Amount of other government funds
received as pass through funds to
consumers (include funds, received on
behalf of consumers, that are
subsequently passed on to consumers,
e.g., personal assistance services,
representative payee funds, Medicaid
funds, etc.)*
188290
Item 1.6 - Net Operating Resources
Page 2 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
Type of Funds Amount
Net Operating Resources = 2754941
Section 2. Distribution of Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B Funds Section 713 of the Act
What Activities were Conducted with
Part B Funds?
Expenditures of Part B
Funds for Services by
DSU Staff
Expenditures for
Services Rendered By
Grant or Contract
(1) Provided resources to
the SILC to carry out its
functions*
0 0
(2) Provided IL services to
individuals with significant
disabilities*
7508 0
(3) Demonstrated ways to
expand and improve IL
services*
0 0
Page 3 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
What Activities were Conducted with
Part B Funds?
Expenditures of Part B
Funds for Services by
DSU Staff
Expenditures for
Services Rendered By
Grant or Contract
(4) Supported the general
operation of CILs that are in
compliance with the
standards and assurances
set forth in subsections (b)
and (c) of section 725 of the
Act*
0 250618
(5) Supported activities to
increase capacity to develop
approaches or systems for
providing IL services*
0 0
(6) Conducted studies and
analyses, gathered
information, developed
model policies, and
presented findings in order
to enhance IL services*
0 0
(7) Provided training
regarding the IL
philosophy*
0 0
Page 4 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
What Activities were Conducted with
Part B Funds?
Expenditures of Part B
Funds for Services by
DSU Staff
Expenditures for
Services Rendered By
Grant or Contract
(8) Provided outreach to
unserved or underserved
populations, including
minority groups and urban
and rural populations*
0 0
Section 3. Grants or Contracts Used to Distribute Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B Funds
Sections 704(f) and 713 of the Act
Name of Grantee or
Contractor
Use of Funds
(based on the
activites listed
in Subpart I,
Section B)
Amount
of Part B
Funds
Amount
of Non-
Part B
Funds
Consumer
Eligibility
Determined
By DSU or
Provider
CSRs
Kept With
DSU or
Provider
ABILITREE GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
18773 23202 Provider Provider
Page 5 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Name of Grantee or
Contractor
Use of Funds
(based on the
activites listed
in Subpart I,
Section B)
Amount
of Part B
Funds
Amount
of Non-
Part B
Funds
Consumer
Eligibility
Determined
By DSU or
Provider
CSRs
Kept With
DSU or
Provider
EASTERN
OREGON
CENTER FOR
INDEPENDENT
LIVING
GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
62500 0 Provider Provider
HASL
INDEPENDENT
ABILITIES
CENTER
GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
30979 0 Provider Provider
INDEPENDENT
LIVING
RESOURCES
GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
20268 0 Provider Provider
LANE
INDEPENDENT
LIVING
ALLIANCE
GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
62836 0 Provider Provider
Page 6 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
Name of Grantee or
Contractor
Use of Funds
(based on the
activites listed
in Subpart I,
Section B)
Amount
of Part B
Funds
Amount
of Non-
Part B
Funds
Consumer
Eligibility
Determined
By DSU or
Provider
CSRs
Kept With
DSU or
Provider
SPOKES
UNLIMITED
GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
19277 6485 Provider Provider
UMPQUA
VALLEY
DISABILITIES
NETWORK
GENERAL
OPERATION
OF CILS
35985 0 Provider Provider
Total Amount
of Grants and
Contracts
250618 29687
Section 4. Grants or Contracts for Purposes Other than Providing IL Services or For the General Operation of Centers Section 713 of the Act
Section 713 of the Act
Describe the objectives, activities and results for each Part B grant
or contract awarded for purposes other than IL services or the
general operation of centers. *
Page 7 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
* - Required field
N/A
Section 5. Monitoring Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B Funds
Provide a summary of the program or fiscal review, evaluation and
monitoring conducted by the state of any of the
grantees/contractors receiving Part B funds during the reporting
year. *
As a result of the enactment of the new Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act regulations, and a lack of clarity regarding the
Designated State Entity’s function, as well as transitions in staff of the
Designated State Entity, reviews were not conducted in the current
reporting period. The Designated State Entity is in the process of
reinstituting the monitoring process after new staff obtain guidance
needed from the Administration for Community Living.
Section 6. Administrative Support Services and Staffing
Item 6.1 - Administrative Support Services
Page 8 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Describe any administrative support services, including staffing,
provided by the DSU to the Part B Program. *
Oregon Commission for the Blind: Regional Rehabilitation Assistance
provided support in scheduling appointments for Independent Living
Instructors.
Vocational Rehabilitation Program: Provided CIL contact
administration services.
Item 6.2 - Staffing
Type of Staff Total Number of FTEsFTEs filled by Individuals
with Disabilities
Decision-Making Staff*
Other Staff*
Page 9 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
9.82
11.90
9.08
10.50
* - Required field
Section 7. For Section 723 States ONLY Section 723 of the Act Section 723 of the Act
Item 7.1 - Distribution of Part C Funds to Centers
Name
of CIL
Amount of
Part C
Funding
Received
Cost of
Living
Increase?
(Yes/No)
Excess
Funds After
Cost of
Living
Increase?
(Yes/No)
New
Center?
(Yes/No)
Onsite
Compliance
Review of
Center?
(Yes/No)
N/A 0 Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Item 7.2 - Administrative Support Services Section 704(c)(2) of the Act
Describe the administrative support services used by the DSU to
administer the Part C program.
Section 704(c)(2) of the Act *
N/A
Page 10 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Item 7.3 - Monitoring and Onsite Compliance Reviews Section 723(g), (h), and (i)
Provide a summary of the monitoring activities involving Part C
centers conducted by the state during the current reporting year,
including the onsite reviews of at least 15% of centers receiving
Part C funds under section 723.The summary should include, at
least, the following: A) centers’ level of compliance with the
standards and assurances in Section 725 of the Act; B) any adverse
actions taken against centers;C) any corrective action plans
entered into with centers; and D) exemplary, replicable or model
practices for centers.
Section 723(g), (h), and (i) *
N/A
Item 7.4 - Updates or Issues
Provide any updates to the administration of the Part C program by
the DSU, if any, including any significant changes in the amount of
earmarked funds or any changes in the order of priorities in the
distribution of Part C funds.Provide a description of any issues of
concern addressed by the DSU in its administration of the Part C
program.
*
Page 11 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
* - Required field
N/A
Number and Types of Individuals with Significant Disabilities Receiving Services
Section 704(m)(4) of the Act
Section 8. Number of Consumers Served During the Reporting Year
Condition # of CSRs
(1) Enter the number of active CSRs carried
over from September 30 of the preceding
reporting year*
111
(2) Enter the number of CSRs started since
October 1 of the reporting year*
381
(3) Total number of consumers served 492
Section 9. Number of CSRs Closed by September 30 of the Reporting Year
Page 12 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
* - Required field
Condition # of CSRs
(1) Moved* 13
(2) Withdrawn* 68
(3) Died* 3
(4) Completed all goals set* 230
(5) Other* 84
(6) Total CSRs closed 398
Section 10. Number of CSRs Active on September 30 of the Reporting Year
Condition # of CSRs
Total number of consumers served - Total
CSRs closed
94
Section 11. IL Plans and Waivers
Page 13 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
Condition # of Consumers
(1) Number of consumers who
signed a waiver*
38
(2) Number of consumers with whom
an ILP was developed*
454
(3) Total number of consumers
served during the reporting year
492
Section 12. Age
Condition # of Consumers
(1) Under 5 years old* 5
(2) Ages 5-19* 17
(3) Ages 20-24* 28
Page 14 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
* - Required field
Condition # of Consumers
(4) Ages 25-59* 356
(5) Age 60 and Older* 86
(6) Age unavailable* 0
Section 13. Sex
Condition # of Consumers
(1) Number of Females served* 239
(2) Number of Males served * 253
Section 14. Race And Ethnicity
Indicate the number of consumers served in each category below. Each
consumer may be counted under ONLY ONE of the following categories in
the 704 Report, even if the consumer reported more than one race and/or
Hispanic/Latino ethnicity).
Page 15 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Condition # of Consumers
(1) American Indian or Alaska Native* 13
(2) Asian* 4
(3) Black or African American* 12
(4) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander*
6
(5) White* 377
(6) Hispanic/Latino of any race or
Hispanic/ Latino only*
63
(7) Two or more races* 13
(8) Race and ethnicity unknown* 4
Page 16 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required fieldSection 15. Disability
Condition # of Consumers
(1) Cognitive* 86
(2) Mental/Emotional* 126
(3) Physical* 183
(4) Hearing* 4
(5) Vision* 19
(6) Multiple Disabilities* 70
(7) Other* 4
Individual Services and Achievements Funded Through Title VII, Chapter 1 Part B Funds
Sections 13 and 704(m) (4)
Page 17 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required fieldSection 16. Individual Services and Achievements
For the reporting year, indicate in the chart below how many consumers
requested and received each of the following IL services.Include all
consumers who were provided services during the reporting year through
Part B funds, either directly by DSU staff or via grants or contracts with other
providers.Do not include consumers who were served by any centers that
received Part C funds during the reporting year.
ServicesConsumers
Requesting Services
Consumers Receiving
Services
(A) Advocacy/Legal Services* 60 58
(B) Assistive Technology* 28 24
(C) Children's Services* 0 0
(D) Communication Services* 22 21
(E) Counseling and Related
Services*
12 4
Page 18 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
ServicesConsumers
Requesting Services
Consumers Receiving
Services
(F) Family Services* 1 1
(G) Housing, Home
Modifications, and Shelter
Services*
61 58
(H) IL Skills Training and Life
Skills Training*
349 344
(I) Information and Referral
Services*
4042 4040
(J) Mental Restoration
Services*
34 34
(K) Mobility Training* 25 24
(L) Peer Counseling
Services*
48 47
Page 19 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
ServicesConsumers
Requesting Services
Consumers Receiving
Services
(M) Personal Assistance
Services*
11 11
(N) Physical Restoration
Services*
1 0
(O) Preventive Services* 6 5
(P) Prostheses, Orthotics, and
Other Appliances*
0 0
(Q) Recreational Services* 1 1
(R) Rehabilitation Technology
Services*
3 1
(S) Therapeutic Treatment* 0 0
(T) Transportation Services* 58 57
Page 20 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
ServicesConsumers
Requesting Services
Consumers Receiving
Services
(U) Youth/Transition
Services*
4 4
(V) Vocational Services* 23 21
(W) Other Services* 9 9
Section 17. Increased Independence and Community Integration
Item 17.1 - Goals Related to Increased Independence in a Significant Life Area
Indicate the number of consumers who set goals related to the following
significant life areas, the number whose goals are still in progress, and the
number who achieved their goals as a result of the provision of IL services.
Significant Life AreaGoals
Set
Goals
AchievedIn Progress
(A) Self-Advocacy/Self-
Empowerment*
70 37 33
Page 21 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Significant Life AreaGoals
Set
Goals
AchievedIn Progress
(B) Communication* 24 13 11
(C) Mobility/Transportation* 88 56 32
(D) Community-Based Living* 56 18 38
(E) Educational* 8 3 5
(F) Vocational* 17 10 7
(G) Self-care* 115 50 65
(H) Information
Access/Technology*
13 9 4
(I) Personal Resource
Management*
149 72 77
Page 22 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Significant Life AreaGoals
Set
Goals
AchievedIn Progress
(J) Relocation from a Nursing Home
or Institution to Community-Based
Living*
0 0 0
(K) Community/Social
Participation*
4 2 2
(L) Other* 2 2 0
Item 17.2-Improved Access To Transportation, Health Care and Assistive Technology
In column one, indicate the number of consumers who required access to
previously unavailable transportation, health care services, or assistive
technology during the reporting year.Of the consumers listed in column one,
indicate in column two, the number of consumers who, as a result of the
provision of IL services (including the four core services), achieved access to
previously unavailable transportation, health care services, or assistive
technology during the reporting year.In column three, list the number of
consumers whose access to transportation, health care services or assistive
technology is still in progress at the end of the reporting year.
Page 23 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
17.2.1 Table
Areas
# of Consumers
Requiring
Access
# of Consumers
Achieving
Access
# of Consumers
Whose Access
is in Progress
(A) Transportation* 93 59 34
(B) Health Care
Services*
132 113 18
(C) Assistive
Technology*
38 24 13
Note: For most IL services, a consumer's access to previously unavailable
transportation, health care and assistive technology is documented through
his or her CSR. In some instances, consumers may achieve an outcome
solely through information and referral (I&R) services.To document
these instances as successful outcomes, providers are not required to create
CSRs for these consumers but must be able to document that follow-up
contacts with these consumers showed access to previously unavailable
transportation, health care and assistive technology.
Item 17.2.2 - I&R Information
Page 24 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
To inform ACL how many service providers engage in I&R follow-up
contacts regarding access to transportation, health care services or assistive
technology, please indicate the following:
The service provider did engage in follow-up contacts with I&R recipients to
document access gained to previously unavailable transportation, health care or
assistive technology
Yes No
Section 18. Additional Information Concerning Individual Services or Achievements
Please provide any additional description or explanation
concerning individual services or achievements reported in subpart
III, including outstanding success stories and/or major obstacles
encountered. *
Information from Oregon Commission for the Blind
Rehabilitation Instructors who work out in the field provide independent
living skills instruction, evaluation, advocacy, and resource information
directly to eligible consumers around the state. They work with
consumers in their home environment and communities to achieve
maximum independence with goals that the consumer sets.
Oregon Commission for the Blind Rehabilitation Instructors
submitted the following success stories for the 2016 report year:
Page 25 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Orientation and Mobility Success Story - A young man who has
recently gone completely blind is working with a Rehabilitation Instructor
on orientation and mobility. After initial lessons it was time to do some
stop light crossings in a light business area. The consumer was nervous
and after the second crossing with his cane he was shaking so badly he
was unable to continue. The instructor continued the route with the
consumer taking her arm and using a human guide (all responsibilities
are on the sighted guide and the person with the visual impairment is
following their body movements by holding on to their elbow.) The
consumer felt more secure and the team talked through the route as
opposed to the student working it independently, with instruction. Fast
forward to after the consumer has worked in many more areas and his
skills have increased. He and the instructor returned to an area adjacent
to the stop light crossing. The instructor orchestrated the route so that
the same stop light intersections were incorporated into the route. When
the route was completed the instructor shared that the consumer had just
crossed the same two signaled intersections that had originally shaken
him up. They smiled and he agreed that his confidence traveling with a
cane had progressed significantly!
Assistive Technology Success Story - A medical professional
contacted the Oregon Commission for the Blind to see if the agency
could support a 50 year old consumer in regard to activities of daily living
and orientation and mobility. This consumer is diabetic and suffers from
complications of diabetes; which includes Diabetic Retinopathy. There
were several areas which needed to be addressed. Daily living skills
included lighting and magnifiers. The Big Eye lamp with a 3.5x lens
enabled the consumer to fill his insulin syringes. The 3x magnifier stand
and pocket enabled the consumer to read his mail and other
Page 26 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
correspondence on a daily basis. The pocket magnifier allowed him to
read labels and price tags when at the store. Writing aids enabled the
consumer to accurately sign his name on various forms and documents
and to independently address his envelopes. In regard to orientation and
mobility, the support cane enables him to walk independently throughout
his home. Red and white reflective tape was applied to his walker. Due to
the neuropathy in his feet and legs, the consumer uses the walker when
out in the community for additional support. He deals with glare when
outside the home. The consumer was supplied with a pair of cocoons to
reduce glare. The consumer remains independent in his home, including
daily activities of living, due to the low vision aids and direct services
supplied to him through the Oregon Commission for the Blind.
Success Stories submitted by Eastern Oregon Center for
Independent Living
Advocacy Success Story - A 60-year-old female, living with various
physical and mental health disabilities, contacted the Center for help in
addressing discriminatory county and city laws that directly affected her
health and that of her constituents. She believed that she was being
denied equal access to her medication and was seeking avenues to
address the perceived bias and challenge the status quo. She and the
Independent Living Special discussed several options that would
potentially address her concerns, with political advocacy being at the top
of her list.
She and the Independent Living Specialist discussed potential advocacy
strategies and chose to start her own local steering committee that would
seek to address changing any unfavorable local law or ordinance. She
shared that she believed direct political engagement would be the most
beneficial way to initiate a dialogue with the public, in order to bridge the
Page 27 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
information gap. In addition, she and the Independent Living Specialist
discussed the benefits of a public advocacy campaign where advocate-
patients and persons with disabilities are leading the charge in issues
that directly affect their lives. She was thankful for the assistance in
formulating her plan to advocate about equitable access to alternative or
holistic medicines.
She contacted the Independent Living Specialist several weeks later to
inform him that she had successfully started and managed a local
steering committee, to open up a meaningful dialogue with the
public. She believed their message was very well received. She also
stated that she believed she could do more to advocate on her
constituents’ behalf by running for political office, and had decided to file
her paperwork to run for the state Senate. She thanked the Independent
Living Specialist for his assistance and his efforts to push her outside of
her own comfort zone.
Skills Training Success Story - A 48-year-old female, living with
physical disabilities, came to the Center seeking independent living skills
training. She was living with her mother, who also experienced a
disability, and depended on her for transportation. She was concerned
that she was not prepared if an unforeseen crisis or disaster happened.
She discussed, with the Independent Living Specialist, potential
transportation solutions that would give her more autonomy and a sense
of preparedness if something were to disrupt the status quo. She decided
that the use of the city bus would be the most manageable and practical
system to learn and use frequently, so she would become comfortable
and confident with navigating the bus system.
Page 28 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
She and the Independent Living Specialist scheduled an appointment to
research the current bus system and do a couple of test runs until she
felt comfortable that she could manage the system without problems.
She and the Independent Living Specialist completed several bus cycles
over the subsequent two weeks without incident, and she shared that
she was confident she could use the city bus in the future.
She called the Independent Living Specialist a few days after their last
training to inform her that she had just gotten back from shopping and
was able to use the city bus without any issue. She thanked the
Independent Living Specialist for her patience and help, and stated she
felt “like a free woman again.”
Success Stories submitted by Lane Independent Living Alliance
Skills Training and Employment Success Story - A 51 year old white
male, with a mental health disability (depression) and a learning
disability, was referred to the Center’s Keeping the Boundaries - Keeping
the Job class. He had lost his last job due to his inability to get along with
his co-workers. His goal was to find and keep part time employment that
works with his disability. His disability (depression) created the barriers of
isolation, lack of social contact, and inability to interact with others (social
anxiety). He spent most of his time alone watching television, with no
social contact.
He worked hard in the class, completing all of the homework
assignments. He was able to learn assertive communication skills and
practice them in class, while also improving his eye contact and
becoming unafraid to ask clarifying questions. This also helped him
improve his interview skills. When the class series ended, he took it upon
himself to apply for membership at the Center’s Peer Support Club and
Page 29 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
started to attend on a regular basis, thereby improving his socialization
and making friends. He also started to attend a True North support group
at the Center, on a regular basis.
Several months later, he reported that, by using the independent
living skills learned at the Center, he had found part-time work that suited
him very well and he felt he was a valued employee. He continues to
enjoy being a member of the Peer Support Club and has developed a
support system.
Housing Success Story - A female consumer identified as having
Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), anxiety, and multiple chemical
sensitivities. She has been in an ongoing housing crisis of homelessness
and couch surfing, which she says was precipitated by ADD-related
difficulties with housekeeping, leading to an eviction. This was
compounded by a fire in the neighborhood of her subsequent home that
made it uninhabitable, because of her sensitivities. Added to this is the
fact that her environmental sensitivities make it very difficult for her to
work, because of routine exposure to chemicals like bleach and cigarette
smoke. As a result, she has extremely limited income, which has made
her housing search particularly challenging in terms of commuting to
view prospective homes and saving money for a security deposit.
The Center’s Peer Support Specialist (PSS) worked with her to develop a
step-by-step plan for seeking housing. The Center evaluated how she
should address the eviction on her record and drafted a cover letter to
include on her rental applications. She and the Specialist also discussed
different means of self-care. This enabled her to manage the stress and
anxiety of homelessness by making sure her basic needs for food,
shelter, and keeping her health care appointments were met consistently.
Page 30 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
She located affordable and safe housing with a friend. She reports being
happy and excited about the home because she now has the privacy of
her own room and proximity to public transportation. Now that she has
housing, she looks forward to redirecting that energy toward other goals,
including finding more paid employment and providing more stability for
her son.
Community Activities and CoordinationSection 704(i), (l), and (m)(4) of the Act
Section 19. Community Activities
Item 19.1 - Community Activities Table
In the table below, summarize the community activities involving the DSU,
SILC and CILs in the Statewide Network of Centers (excluding Part C fund
recipients) during the reporting year. For each activity, identify the primary
disability issue(s) addressed as well as the type of activity conducted.
Indicate the entity(ies) primarily involved and the time spent. Describe the
primary objective(s) and outcome(s) for each activity. Add more rows as
necessary.
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Page 31 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Health Collaboration/Networking DSU 10 Health care
providers
educated
regarding the
resources
available to OCB
consumers who
are blind.
Transportation Advocacy DSU 3 Public
transportation
needs are met for
consumers who
are blind.
Other Collaboration/Networking DSU 23 Consumers who
are blind are
better served due
to the building of
partnerships with
other service
providers.
Page 32 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Education/Public Info DSU 77 Consumers &
general public
know about
resources for
maintaining
independence for
individuals who
are blind.
Other Education/Public Info DSU 56 Individuals &
families dealing
with Macular
Degeneration
have needed
information and
resources.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 9 Consumers from
the Confederated
Tribes of Umatilla
have a voice in
SPIL planning.
Page 33 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 421 Oregon
consumers have
effective Aging
and Disability
Resource
Centers
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 417 Individuals are
able to live in less
restrictive
environments.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 9 Students with
disabilities at
Eastern Oregon
University receive
IL services, when
needed.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Consumers from
the Burns Paiute
Tribe receive IL
services when
needed.
Page 34 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 94 People living with
disabilities have
increased
employment
opportunities.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 834 EOCIL has
minimum base
funding to
stabilize services.
Assistive
Technology
Education/Public Info CIL 16 Consumers are
better able to
participate in life
activities.
Other Education/Public Info CIL 10 Students have
knowledge of the
ADA and IL
Services.
Page 35 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Education/Public Info CIL 21 Increase
community
knowledge of the
IL philosophy, IL
movement,
disability rights
and services.
Other Education/Public Info CIL 15 Consumers have
necessary
information to
prepare for
emergencies.
Other Education/Public Info CIL 2 Media outlets
foster a positive
disability image.
Page 36 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Education/Public Info CIL 41 People with
Disabilities can
access available
resources to
enhance
independence.
Other Education/Public Info CIL 28 Youth with
disabilities have
access to
services that
enhance
independence.
Health Care Advocacy CIL 65 Consumers
seeking health
care have
opportunities to
connect with IL
services.
Page 37 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Advocacy CIL 1648 Service Systems
and community
inclusion for
people with
disabilities is
enhanced.
Other Advocacy CIL 5 Self-sufficiency,
access to
housing, health
care, and
transportation for
people with
disabilities is
enhanced.
Transportation Advocacy CIL 2 Consumers have
greater access to
accessible
transportation.
Page 38 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Health Care Outreach Efforts CIL 679 Consumers are
connected to IL
services through
contacts with
Health
Departments.
Health Care Outreach Efforts CIL 24 Consumers are
connected to IL
services through
contacts with
Area Agencies on
Aging.
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 2 Vocational
Rehabilitation
consumers have
access to
benefits planning
services.
Page 39 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 52 Consumers are
connected to IL
services through
contacts with
various entities.
Other Education/Public Info CIL 10 Greater
community
disability
awareness.
Other Technical Assistance CIL 22 Individuals with
disabilities have
greater access to
their
communities.
Health Care Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Referral
processes exist
for consumers
seeking mental
health supports
and services.
Page 40 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 1 A collaborative
community crisis
project is
developed.
Health Care Collaboration/Networking CIL 1 Oregon State
Hospital social
workers are
educated about
LILA and True
North, and
exploring
collaborations.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 4 Increase referrals
from partner
agencies.
Page 41 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Assistive
Technology
Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Coordination of
Emergency
Preparedness
vendors exists for
service access,
functionality, and
inclusion of all
vendors.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 4 Work with
Consumer
Advisory Council
improves
services and
increase referrals
to LILA.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 9 Architecture
students are
educated about
inclusive design.
Page 42 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 1 White Bird Clinic
Eugene, is aware
of LILA’s services
and collaboration
is established.
Health Care Collaboration/Networking CIL 12 Peace Health
Hospital
addresses
recommendations
of
patients/families.
Transportation Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Community
leaders/decision-
makers are
aware of
resources and
issues related to
people who are
blind.
Page 43 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Housing Collaboration/Networking CIL 24 People with
disabilities have
access to
affordable and
accessible
transportation
and shelter.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Advocacy &
Outreach
Workers of Lane
County (AOWLC)
provide options
for collaboration.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Homeless
individuals with
disabilities have
access to
housing/shelter.
Page 44 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 3 Collaboration
exists between
agencies that are
informed about
WIN TA.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 3 A comprehensive
Emergency Prep
plan includes
community
partners, cross-
disability groups,
nonprofits &
public entities.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Partnerships exist
between LILA
and Eugene
Senior and
Disabled
Services.
Page 45 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 All Looking Glass
Organization
department
overseers are
introduced to
LILA.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Shelter Care's
Consumer
Council is
informed about
LILA.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 4 Action plan is
established to
work with other
COAD member
organizations.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Partnership exists
with Direct
Service staff.
Page 46 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Consumer
referrals increase
from Bethel
School District for
Youth Transition
Program.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 1 Emergency
preparedness
organizations are
prepared to
appropriately
serve people with
disabilities.
Other Collaboration/Networking CIL 2 Partnership exists
with City of
Eugene’s
Emergency
Preparedness
system.
Page 47 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Health Care Education/Public Info CIL 48 Health Care
delivery system is
responsive to
access needs for
people with
disabilities.
Health Care Education/Public Info CIL 60 Change Health
Care System to
be more
comprehensive
and equitable
Health Care Education/Public Info CIL 48 Equitable access
to healthy food,
shelter,
transportation
and education for
people with
disabilities.
Page 48 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Health Care Education/Public Info CIL 48 OHP members
participate in their
own healthy
choices and
activities.
Transportation Education/Public Info CIL 6 Review and
revise Lane
Transit District
reasonable
accommodation
policy for riders
with disabilities.
Assistive
Technology
Education/Public Info CIL 2 Eugene Lions
Club members
are informed in
regard to the
blind community
and use of
assistive
technology.
Page 49 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Education/Public Info CIL 6 Community is
aware of IL
philosophy,
ableism, and
domestic &
sexual violence
against people
with disabilities.
Other Education/Public Info CIL 2 Integrate CILs
into other parts of
the world.
Transportation Technical Assistance CIL 1 U of O mapping
project is
accessible.
Transportation Advocacy CIL 12 Appropriate
priorities exist for
proposal for STF
one-time use
funds.
Page 50 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Transportation Advocacy CIL 2 Appropriate
citywide
improvements
are made to
mass transit.
Transportation Advocacy CIL 4 Access and
usability of
transportation by
individuals with
disabilities is
approved.
Transportation Advocacy CIL 2 Partnership exists
with U of O on
student Design
Product
Transportation
projects.
Assistive
Technology
Advocacy CIL 3 Disaster
preparedness in
regard to people
with disabilities is
improved.
Page 51 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Advocacy CIL 2 Oregon Heart
and Vascular
Institute is
informed
regarding LILA,
including core
services.
Other Advocacy CIL 2 Consumers within
the mental health
system have
necessary
information.
Other Advocacy CIL 2 Draft plan
initiated by Urban
Sustainability
Directors
Network.
Page 52 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 2 Domestic
Violence/Sexual
Assault against
people with
disabilities is
decreased.
Health Care Outreach Efforts CIL 1 Education exists
on recovery
model.
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 3 Students in
transition &
providers of I/DD
services are
aware of LILA’s
services and
resources.
Page 53 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 2 Inpatient
Neurology,
Orthopedics,
OHVI, &
Northwest
Specialty Clinic
are aware of LILA
core services.
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 2 ORC staff can
provide patients
with information
about LILA in
discharge
packets.
Other Outreach Efforts CIL 1 Partnership is
established with
Lane CO Youth
Transition
Program.
Page 54 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Advocacy SILC 35 ADRCs include
CILs in
coordinated, and
holistic services.
Health Care Advocacy SILC 97 LTSS system
program is viable
and meets
needs, following
DOL Rule
change.
Other Advocacy SILC 23 Continuation of
the valuable
services provided
through ADRC
partners.
Page 55 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 192 DHS & OHA
policies support
highest level of
independence,
choice, dignity &
inclusion of
people with
disabilities.
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 28 Oregon
consumers are
satisfied with
Oregon ABLE Act
Savings Plan
implementation.
Health Care Collaboration/Networking SILC 39 Oregon’s
Medicaid Unit
works together
with consumers
to improve
policies and
practices.
Page 56 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Transportation Advocacy SILC 12 Public
Transportation
Strategic
Planning
considers needs
of individuals with
all types of
disabilities.
Other Outreach Efforts SILC 10 Consumers
engage in
planning/
analysis of
transportation,
LTSS, housing,
assistive
technology,
health care, etc.
Health Care Collaboration/Networking SILC 15 Maintain a viable,
barrier free &
respected work
incentive program
for Oregonians
with disabilities.
Page 57 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 25 Facilitate access
of people with
disabilities to IL
services through
partner
collaborations.
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 38 Impacts on the
independence of
people with
disabilities or the
IL program are
responded to in a
timely manner.
Other Education/Public Info SILC 4 Professionals in
the rehabilitation
field make
referrals to CILs,
when
appropriate.
Page 58 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Health Care Collaboration/Networking SILC 52 LTC facilities are
improved through
cross-training,
technical
assistance, and
use of
technology.
Health Care Advocacy SILC 69 The supply of
Homecare and
Personal Support
Workers is
increased to meet
the growing
demand.
Housing Advocacy SILC 83 Recipients of
HCBS programs
can live in the
most integrated
setting.
Page 59 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 6 Individuals and
disability service
organizations
work together on
common goals
and share
information.
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 4 Emergency
response
strategies in
Oregon address
functional needs
of individuals with
disabilities.
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 26 Disability
integration into
Emergency
Planning systems
meets the needs
of people with
disabilities.
Page 60 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Issue Area Activity TypePrimary
Entity
Hours
SpentObjective(s)
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 2 Peers within the
psychiatric
disability
community are
integrated in the
peer movement.
Health Care Advocacy SILC 2 Appropriate
environments
exist for
individuals with
extreme
behavioral issues
related to brain
injury.
Other Collaboration/Networking SILC 1 Individuals with
disabilities have
improved
financial stability.
Page 61 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Item 19.2 - Description of Community Activities
For the community activities mentioned above, provide any
additional details such as the role of the DSU, SILC, CIL, and/or
consumers, names of any partner organizations and further
descriptions of the specific activities, services and benefits. *
Acronyms used in table above:
AAA-Area Agency on Aging
ABLE- Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014
ADA-Americans with Disabilities Act
ADRC-Aging and Disability Resource Connection
APD-Aging and People with Disabilities (State disability service program)
APRIL-Association of Programs for Rural Independent Living
CCO-Coordinated Care Organizations
COAD-Community Organizations Active in Disaster
COC-Chamber of Commerce
DHS-Oregon’s Department of Human Services
DOL-Department of Labor
EOCIL-Eastern Oregon Center for Independent Living
EPD-Employed Persons with Disabilities
FEMA-Federal Emergency Management Administration
HCBS-Home and Community-Based Services
HCW-Homecare Workers
HOH-Hard of Hearing
I/DD-Intellectual/Developmental Disability
ILS-Independent Living Specialist
LILA-Lane Independent Living Alliance
Page 62 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
LCBH-Lane County Behavioral Health
LCC-Lane Community College
LTC-Long-Term Care
LTD-Lane Transit District
LTSS-Long-term Services and Supports
NCIL-National Council on Independent Living
OCB-Oregon Commission for the Blind
ODDS-Office of Developmental Disability Services
ODOT-Oregon Department of Transportation
OHA-Oregon Health Authority
OHA-HSD/AMH-Health Services Division Addictions & Mental Health
ORC-Oregon Rehabilitation Center
OSLP-Oregon Supported Living Program
PSWs-Personal Support Workers
PWDs-People with Disabilities
SPIL-State Plan for Independent Living
SSDI-Social Security Disability Insurance
STEPS to Success with your Homecare Worker (Training for employers
of Homecare Workers)
STF-Special Transportation Funds
TBI-Traumatic Brain Injury
U of O-University of Oregon
USICD-United States International Council on Disabilities
WILD-Women’s Institute on Leadership and Disability
WIN-Work Incentive Network (benefits planning services)
WOU-Western Oregon University
Eastern Oregon Center for Independent Living:
Page 63 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
It is the primary function of every employee and the Board of Directors to
fulfill the mission of the Corporation. The organizational structure is
designed to fulfill this purpose.
The Board monitors EOCIL’s operations and contributes significantly to
community involvement and relations with the public. The Board
participates in community planning sessions and other meetings and
trainings promoting the independent living philosophy.
Employees of EOCIL develop annual individual work plans that identify
targeted goals that focus on increasing opportunities for affordable and
accessible housing units, access to assistive technology, access to
appropriate health care and access to reliable transportation.
Lane Independent Living Alliance:
Shelter Care – Supportive Employment for Consumers with Mental
and Physical Challenges – LILA Staff worked closely with the Shelter
Care Employment Specialist as a community partner, to take a pragmatic
and empathetic approach to assisting consumers with barriers to
employment make progress in achieving their personal goals.
Accessible Transportation Advisory Committee - A Committee
established by the Lane Transit District (LTD) Board of Directors, served
as an agent for the administration of Special Transportation Fund for the
elderly and people with disabilities, and as an advisory committee to LTD
regarding accessibility for seniors and people with disabilities. A LILA IL
Specialist is a member of this committee.
Page 64 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
White Bird and CAHOOTS - A Community Crisis Response team
affiliated with White Bird mental health crisis and support center. LILA
Peer Support staff often access the services of CAHOOTS when we are
faced with a consumer in a mental health crisis situation. They provide a
mobile pick up service, and can transport a consumer in crisis to a
mental health crisis facility. CAHOOTS is a major resource in crisis
management services.
Advocacy Outreach Workers of Lane County (AOWLC) provides
networking opportunities and community resource education for outreach
providers in Lane County.
Lane County Consumer Advisory Council (CAC) - monthly forum for
mental health consumers to meet with providers and administrators, to
express concerns and receive updates on health care policy.
Opal Network - A coalition of mental health consumers, survivors,
families, providers and others who work to better understand mental
health issues while supporting the voice, empowerment and self-
determination of consumers of mental health services in Lane County.
LILA has joined with Ron Unger (CFD) and Elaine Walters (THC) to plan
and facilitate quarterly meetings and events on the 5th Tuesday of each
quarter. Attendance at these meetings is reduced this year and we are
looking for mental health consumers who are interested in continuing
Opal through greater involvement of the members in Lane County. These
events are always open to the community and generally held at the
Eugene Public Library, as it is central and across the street from LTD
Bus Station.
Page 65 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required fieldSection 20. Working Relationships Among Various Entities
Describe DSU and SILC activities to maximize the cooperation,
coordination, and working relationships among the independent
living program, the SILC, and CILs; and the DSU, other state
agencies represented on the SILC, other councils that address the
needs of specific disability populations and issues, and other
public and private entities. Describe the expected or actual
outcomes of these activities. *
Page 66 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Cooperation, coordination and working relationships among the independent living program partners
1. Facilitation of SPIL activities:
To guide SPIL implementation, entities with responsibilities to implement
specific tasks receive a matrix detailing their role and responsibilities for
carrying out those tasks. SPIL progress reports provide periodic
information needed to evaluate the effectiveness and progress of various
tasks. The reports help the DSU verify CIL grant deliverables, while
helping the SILC monitor progress toward SPIL goals and evaluate the
effectiveness of the State Plan’s implementation.
Outcomes:
• Accountability for carrying out the SPIL activities.
• Maximization of a single reporting instrument reduces paperwork for
CILs.
• Unfortunately, this year some of the report provision broke down due
to staffing transitions, which is currently being resolved.
2. VR/DSU Grants to CILs:
VR continued its role of collaborating with CILs and managing the CIL IL
grant program in the report year.
Outcomes:
Page 67 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
• CILs continued to be supported financially, and consumers receive
needed services.
• Positive outcomes for consumers.
• CILs and the DSU had regular meetings, which allowed for problem
solving whenever issues developed.
3. Coordination with the Consumer Assistance Program (CAP):
The SILC provided the CAP with notices of quarterly SILC meetings, and
the a CAP representative was often is present at those meetings to
provide any needed information. CAP activities related to the IL program
are made available to the SILC via the CAP’s annual report so that
statewide trends can be reviewed and used in relationship to SPIL
planning. The CAP also was asked to provide input in regard to
development of the State Plan for Independent Living.
Outcomes:
• The CAP is more aware of what is happening at individual CILs by
hearing the reports CILs give at the SILC meetings.
• Relationship development between the CAP representative and CILs
improved working relationships, when needs developed to address
consumer issues.
• When needed, opportunities exist to address system-wide trends in
consumer issues, through the program evaluation processes coordinated
by the SILC.
• The overall outcome is that consumers receive more appropriate and
effective services.
Page 68 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Cooperation, coordination and working relationships of independent living program partners with non-IL programs and partners:
1. VR and CIL Employment Collaborations:
The VR program continued to partner with CILs, purchasing CIL services
to enhance employment for people with disabilities. This occurred
through purchase of services for individual consumers, and contracts
with CILs for providing specific services for all VR consumers. The Work
Incentives Network (WIN), operated by the VR program, contracted with
CILs to facilitate work incentive and benefits planning on-site and
remotely, utilizing up-to-date technology such as Skype, Zoom and other
long-distance services, with a total of 10.5 WIN counselors delivering
services at six different CILs. The WIN program was able to increase the
total number of FTE counselors to 10.75 as of June 1, 2016. A separate
funding stream for WIN service was available from the Legislature,
instead of it being associated with the VR program maintenance of effort.
This allows WIN services to be made available to both VR and non-VR
consumers, which was the original intent of the program. This year,
outreach of the WIN program included 199 VR partners, 52 mental health
providers, and 102 intellectual/developmental disabilities providers, and
45 others from Housing, Youth Transition Programs, and other
community partners. WIN also partnered with Oregon Employment
Leadership Network to provide five two-day trainings, in Salem, Eugene,
Bend and Portland, to 155 Oregon Development Disabilities Services
providers and partners.
A contract with Abilitree, in central Oregon, provided job preparation
services to VR consumers. This included individual and group vocational
Page 69 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
goal targeting and skill development in Bend and Redmond. Topics
included vocational goal exploration, labor market research, informational
interviews, job shadowing, marketing tools and resume review.
A contract with LILA, in Eugene, provided Work Readiness Alternatives
Workshops (WRAW), which ended in July of 2016. WRAW gives
participants the opportunity to increase their understanding of the VR
process, increase their social ability, and prepare themselves to make
realistic choices related to future employment, with the goal of obtaining
and maintaining employment. A 25% rehabilitation rate is typically
expected from participants of WRAW.
LILA also has a contract to provide job development services in the
Salem VR office, and employment-related IL services to consumers in
the Eugene and Salem VR offices.
Contracts between VR and several CILs provided transitioning youth with
self-advocacy training between July and September of 2016, using a
self-advocacy curriculum from the University of Kansas.
Outcomes:
• The VR consumers served by CILs experienced a holistic service
approach, which provided greater job readiness and likelihood for
sustained employment.
• More than 11,000 people gained knowledge about incentives to work,
and interaction between employment and benefits over the past 8 years.
• Employment for consumers of WIN services has increased so much
that WIN had to limit comprehensive benefits planning services to those
Page 70 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
who were employed.
• WIN staff are seeing more consumers returning for additional
services based on having become employed, including more time-
intensive services, such as helping to fill out Social Security
Administration Work Activity Reviews or filling out Impairment Related
Work Expense and Subsidy requests.
• Referrals appear to be increasing for people thinking about working,
but who are fearful of losing benefits, to the point that a wait list exists
and a Help Desk was initiated to answer basic questions while awaiting
more intensive services.
• Youth are better equipped to advocate for their disability-related
issues as they transition out of High School.
2. Participation in partner committees and work groups:
CILs and the SILC had numerous opportunities to participate in planning
and advisory groups of different agencies and programs. The SILC
frequently informs the Association of Oregon Centers for Independent
Living of opportunities for participation at the state level. These
opportunities help develop connections with a number of additional
partners, opening doors that help the SILC and CILs carry out the
mission of the SPIL and the goals of the IL program. Examples of state-
level connections this reporting year include:
• AARP
• Advocacy Coalition of Seniors and People with Disabilities
• Adult Foster Homes Association
• ADRC Steering Committee & Statewide Advisory Committee
• Alzheimer’s Assoc.
• Area Agencies on Aging
• Coordinated Care Organizations
Page 71 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
• County Mental Health Departments
• Dept. of Human Services-Aging and People with Disabilities: Depart.
of Labor Companionship Rule Change Stakeholders
• Dept. of Human Services-Aging and People with Disabilities: Home
and Community Based Rule Implementation Stakeholders
• Dept. of Human Services-Aging and People with Disabilities: K Plan
Option Design and Implementation Council
• Dept. of Human Services-Aging and People with Disabilities: Oregon
Administrative Rules Advisory Committees
• Dept. of Human Services-Developmental/Intellectual Disabilities
Services
• Governor’s Advocacy Office
• Governor’s Commission on Senior Services
• Medicaid Advisory Committees
• Medicaid Long-Term Care Quality & Reimbursement Advisory
Committee
• Northwest Senior and Disability Services
• Office of Equity and Multicultural Services
• Oregon ABLE Savings Plan
• Office of Equity and Inclusion
• Council on Developmental Disabilities
• Dept. of Transportation – Public Transportation Division
• Disabilities Commission and its Executive Committee
• Disabilities Commission-Employed Persons with Disabilities
Subcommittee
• Healthcare Association
• Health Authority Ombuds Advisory Committee
• Health Authority-Consumer Engagement
• Home Care Commission
Page 72 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
• Long-Term Care Ombudsman Office
• State Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 503
• State Rehabilitation Council
• State Unit on Aging
Outcomes:
• The IL program was informed about and able to respond to trends
and legislation affecting people with disabilities.
• A consumer voice was expressed at the planning level for projects
and services affecting people with disabilities, causing the resulting
services to be more effective for consumers.
• Potential opportunities for CILs to play a role in various projects were
explored. Examples: The potential restart of Oregon’s General
Assistance program; initiation of a more holistic approach to the new pilot
project of Oregon’s Collaborative Disability Determination Unit for
providing Social Security benefit application assistance to people with
disabilities.
• The IL philosophy’s foothold in other programs and services was
expanded.
• Helpful partnerships and information were gained to assess the
needs of people with disabilities and evaluate implementation of the
State Plan for Independent Living.
• There has been an expansion of the value partners have for
collaboration with IL services.
3. Beneficial connections through SILC member activities:
SILC members had connections with the following groups in their
personal and work activities during 2016.
Page 73 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
• Advertising Federation of Central Oregon
• ADRC Advisory Committees & Steering Committee
• Aging and Disability Services Advisory Councils
• Aging and People with Disabilities Program Stakeholders
• American Council of the Blind
• ARC of Oregon & of Benton County
• Assoc. for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually
Impaired
• Assoc. of Oregon Centers for Independent Living
• Assoc. of Programs for Rural Independent Living
• Broadway Life Center (English as a Second Language Program)
• Broadway Plan (low-income apartment complex)
• Campaign for Oregon’s Seniors and People with Disabilities
• Casey Eye Institute
• Child Abuse Prevention Partnership
• City of Sandy Transit Advisory Council
• Coalition on Access
• Coordinated Care Organizations
• Community Action Board
• Community Village
• Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
• Various Tribal Vocational Rehabilitation Programs
• Consortia of Administrators for Native American Rehabilitation
• Dept. of Labor Steering Committee
• Devers Eye Institute
• Douglas Co. 211 Advisory Committee
• Douglas Co. Developmental Disabilities Coalition
• Douglas Co. Domestic Violence Prevention Coalition
• Douglas Co. Habitat for Humanity
Page 74 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
• Douglas Co. Homeless Coalition
• Douglas Co. Lifespan Advisory Council
• Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics and Orthotics Services
Committee
• Full Access Brokerage
• Glide School District Budget and Site Committees
• Governor’s Commission on Senior Services
• Health Plan Action Councils
• Healthy, Active Douglas County Coalition
• Home Life Board of Directors
• Intellectual Development Disabilities Advisory Council
• K-Plan Design & Implementation Steering Committee
• League of Women Voters, Corvallis
• Marion Polk County Self Protection Advocacy & Rights Council
• Multi-Disciplinary Team (Bend area)
• Multiple Sclerosis Support Group
• National Assoc. of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
• National Alliance on Mental Illness, Oregon
• National Council on Independent Living
• National Federation of the Blind
• National Indian Education Assoc.
• National Spinal Cord Injury Assoc.
• Native American Rehabilitation Assoc.
• Northeast Housing Authority
• NW Assoc. for Blind Athletes
• Oral Hull Foundation for the Blind
• Assoc. of Area Agencies on Aging and Disabilities
• Business Leadership Network
• Oregon Disability Services Advisory Council and Executive
Page 75 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Committee
• Family and Community Together
• Oregon Health Authority’s Ombudsman Advisory Council
• Oregon Home Care Commission, and subcommittees including Home
Care worker Training, Personal Support Workers, Developmental
Disability & Mental Health, Home Care Registry, Home Care Choice
Program, Workforce Development, Collective Bargaining and Strategic
Planning
• Oregon Rehabilitation Assoc.
• Oregon Self Advocacy Coalition
• Peer Delivered Services Coalition of Lane Co.
• Portland State University Advisory Board – Clinical Rehabilitation
Counseling Program
• Roseburg Elementary School Sports Program
• Roseburg Public Works Advisory Committee
• Rotary of Central Oregon
• Salem Leadership Foundation
• Silver Spinners (Wheelchair Square Dance Group)
• St. Paul Lutheran School Board
• State Rehabilitation Council
• Thriving Waters (a community culture and education promotion
organization)
• Tri-County Special Transportation Fund Advisory Council
• Trillium Older Adult Collaborative
• Union Co. Board of Commissioners
• United Way Interagency Relations Committee
• Various Professional Associations for Ophthalmologists and
Optometrists
• Various Religious Organizations
Page 76 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
• Various Tribal Vocational Rehabilitation Programs
• Veteran’s Services
• Volunteer Services Advisory Council
• Westside Community Garden
Outcomes:
• Specific outcomes of each of these connections is not tracked.
However, these contacts gave Council members insight into issues
impacting people with disabilities and the needs for IL services, which
informed the SPIL Development process (needs assessment) and aided
in carrying out coordination activities of the SPIL.
• Better service coordination and a decreased potential for service
duplication.
• Responsiveness to the rights and needs of people with disabilities
was increased through advocacy.
• Organizational networking allowed important information to filter down
to current and potential consumers and partners.
• Likelihood of cross-agency referrals increased.
• Awareness and implementation of IL philosophy was increased in
other service systems.
Statewide Independent Living Council (SILC)Section 705 of the Act
Section 21. Composition and Appointment
Page 77 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Item 21.1 - Current SILC Composition
In the chart below, provide the requested information for each SILC member.
The category in which the member was appointed can be described, for
example, as ex-officio state agency representative, other state agency
representative, center representative, person with a disability not employed
by a center or state agency, section 121 funded project director, parent of
person with a disability, community advocate, other service provider, etc.
Include current vacancies, along with the corresponding appointment
category for each. Add more rows as necessary.
Name of
SILC
member
Employed
by CIL,
State
Agency or
Neither
Appointment
CategoryVoting or Non-Voting Term Start Date
Angie
Butler
Neither Other service
provider
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Sarah
Jo
Chaplen
Employed
by State
Ex-officio state
agency
representative
Voting Non-Voting
01T08:00:00.000Z"
Tanya
DeHart
Neither Other service
provider
Voting Non-Voting
24T07:00:00.000Z"
Page 78 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Name of
SILC
member
Employed
by CIL,
State
Agency or
Neither
Appointment
CategoryVoting or Non-Voting Term Start Date
Tony
Ellis
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Eli
Ettinger
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
08T07:00:00.000Z"
Jack
Howard
Neither Advocate Voting Non-Voting
05T07:00:00.000Z"
Trina
Lee
Employed
by State
Ex-officio state
agency
representative
Voting Non-Voting
01T08:00:00.000Z"
Joseph
Lowe
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Janet
Lowther
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Page 79 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Name of
SILC
member
Employed
by CIL,
State
Agency or
Neither
Appointment
CategoryVoting or Non-Voting Term Start Date
Ben
Luskin
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
10T08:00:00.000Z"
Ruth
McEwen
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Susan
Melero
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Bettye
Ramirez
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
12T08:00:00.000Z"
Charles
Richards
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
05T07:00:00.000Z"
Greg
Sublett
Employed
by CIL
Center
Representative
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Page 80 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Name of
SILC
member
Employed
by CIL,
State
Agency or
Neither
Appointment
CategoryVoting or Non-Voting Term Start Date
Sheila
Thomas
Employed
by CIL
Center
Representative
Voting Non-Voting
16T08:00:00.000Z"
Marsha
Wentzell
Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
05T07:00:00.000Z"
Vacant Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
30T07:00:00.000Z"
Vacant Employed
by CIL
Center
Representative
Voting Non-Voting
14T07:00:00.000Z"
Vacant Neither Person with a
disability
Voting Non-Voting
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Page 81 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Name of
SILC
member
Employed
by CIL,
State
Agency or
Neither
Appointment
CategoryVoting or Non-Voting Term Start Date
Vacant Employed
by
CIL/State
or Neither
Open category Voting Non-Voting "2013-04-
01T07:00:00.000Z"
Vacant Employed
by
CIL/State
or Neither
Open category Voting Non-Voting "2013-03-
01T08:00:00.000Z"
Vacant Employed
by CIL
Tribal CIL
Representative
Voting Non-Voting "2014-07-
22T07:00:00.000Z"
Item 21.2-SILC Composition Requirements
Please provide the information requested in the chart below. Include any
current vacancies in a particular appointment category.
SILC Composition # of SILC members
Page 82 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
SILC Composition # of SILC members
(A) How many members are on the
SILC?*23
(B) How many members of the SILC are
individuals with disabilities not
employed by a state agency or a center
for independent living?*
12
(C) How many members of the SILC are
voting members?*21
(D) How many of the voting members of
the SILC are individuals with disabilities
not employed by a state agency or a
center for independent living?*
12
Section 22. SILC Membership Qualifications Section 705(b)(4) of the Act
Item 22.1-Statewide Representation
Describe how the SILC is composed of members who provide
statewide representation. *
Page 83 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
SILC members represent five of six regions of the state. Ninety-five
percent of the population lives in just two of the regions, and the majority
of SILC members typically live in those regions. It is an achievement to
have current members from some of the more rural areas of the state.
One extremely rural region has a very limited population, and the SILC
has not found individuals from that region with interest in serving as
members. That region is an ongoing challenge. As members are needed,
Centers for Independent Living and community partners are asked for
assistance in recruiting individuals from local communities in areas
where representation is needed.
Item 22.2 - Broad Range of Individuals with Disabilities from Diverse Backgrounds
Describe how the SILC members represent a board range of
individuals with disabilities from diverse backgrounds. *
The SILC compares its member demographics with statewide population
demographics to discover where there are gaps in representation, and
undertakes targeted recruitment. Recruitment targets are communicated
to SILC members, Centers for Independent Living, community partners,
and noted on the SILC’s website.
Member Expertise: Members in 2016 had a variety of backgrounds.
Members represented tribal vocational rehabilitation services, general
and blind vocational rehabilitation services, Area Agencies on
Page 84 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Aging/services for seniors, Medicaid services, Aging and Disability
Resource Centers, spinal cord rehabilitation, operation of non-profits and
government programs serving people with disabilities, governmental
grant management, grant writers, self-advocates, parents of children and
adults with disabilities, siblings of people with disabilities, veterans, and
peer mentors. For additional information about member
involvements/expertise, see item 2, listed under “Cooperation,
coordination and working relationships among other state agencies
represented on the SILC…,” within Subpart IV, Section B.
Disability: Members represented physical, mental health, cognitive,
developmental and sensory disabilities.
Ethnicity: The State of Oregon lacks significant racial diversity.
However, during this reporting period, member ethnicity included all
major ethnic categories. At the close of the SPIL period, the Council
lacked representation of Pacific Islander/Hawaiian and Asian individuals,
which makes up approximately 4.4% of the population.
Rural/Urban: Members are spread across both urban and rural
communities.
Item 22.3 - Knowledgeable about IL
Describe how SILC members are knowledgeable about centers for
independent living and independent living services. *
Page 85 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
In 2016, SILC members included individuals who work in organizations
that refer consumers to CILs, CIL staff, former CIL staff, individuals who
are peer mentors who live the IL philosophy, peers who assist CILs on a
voluntary basis, and individuals who are current and former CIL
consumers, as well as individuals who have experience with CIL services
outside of Oregon. The small size of Oregon’s Independent Living
community makes it difficult to recruit qualified members with CIL
experience who are not currently employed by a CIL or a state agency,
especially in very rural areas, and in areas that do not currently have a
CIL. The Council has also attempted to maintain the intended consumer
focus and diversity by limiting the number of members who are employed
by a CIL.
The SILC encourages CILs to assist with recruiting consumers, past
board members, etc. The Council also uses training processes to assure
the Council has qualified members who understand the function of CILs
and the role of CIL services. During the screening process, applicant
interviews and reference checks are designed to assure individuals
understand and live the Independent Living philosophy, even if they are
not familiar with program terminology. Those who do not have extensive
Independent Living backgrounds, but do live the philosophy, are provided
with training in the history and philosophy of the Independent Living
movement, program law, and program structure on a regular basis.
Additionally, members without a background in CIL services are
expected to visit a CIL to become more familiar with the workings of a
CIL. Individual CILs also report at SILC meetings and serve on planning
committees, giving members opportunity to learn about their services,
structure and staff.
Page 86 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required fieldSection 23. SILC Staffing and Support
Item 23.1-SILC Staff
Please provide the name and contact information for the SILC
executive director. Indicate the number and titles of any other SILC
staff, if applicable. Also indicate whether any SILC staff is also a
state agency employee. *
SILC Executive Director - Tina Treasure
One Operations Coordinator
One part time Administrative Assistant
Executive Director’s Contact Information: [email protected];
503.945.6621; 500 Summer St. NE, E-87, Salem, OR 97301
Since the Oregon Constitution prevents the SILC from being established
as a non-profit entity, all staff are state employees. The Oregon SILC is
not officially part of any other state agency. However, it does partner
closely with the Department of Human Services (DHS), and has a co-
location agreement. Interaction between Oregon law and the
Rehabilitation Act has made it difficult for Oregon’s Department of Justice
to determine a clear means for the SILC to obtain its own fiscal, contract,
or staff position authority from the Legislature, so the Designated State
Unit functions as an agent on the SILC’s behalf.
Page 87 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Through written agreements with DHS and its Vocational Rehabilitation
program, and the Executive Order establishing the SILC, the Council is
able to maintain autonomy. The Vocational Rehabilitation program lends
some of its staffing positions to the SILC in this arrangement. This
technically makes SILC staff employees of DHS. However, the written
agreement between the Vocational Rehabilitation program and the SILC
clarifies the roles of each entity, and states that the SILC is not an entity
within DHS, has authority for hiring and supervising its staff (in
conjunction with state law), and that DHS/VR may not interfere with SILC
personnel. This method was discussed with the Rehabilitation Services
Administration when the SILC was formed, and was deemed to provide
the SILC with the level of autonomy intended by law.
Item 23.2 - SILC Support
Describe the administrative support services provided by the DSU,
if any. *
Through a written agreement with the SILC, the Vocational Rehabilitation
program at the Department of Human Services provides the following
support services to the SILC:
• Fiscal and payroll services, as well as accounting services (as the
SILC’s fiscal agent), and works with the SILC to reconcile data with the
SILC’s in-house records, including supplying reports for regular and
special audits of the SILC.
Page 88 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
• Funds legal costs and services from the Attorney General’s office, if
needed.
• Supports contract development on the SILC’s behalf, in accordance
with State of Oregon requirements.
• Shares information regarding legislative issues, and statewide
policies for government entities, as may apply to SILC duties.
• Shares notices from the federal program authorities relevant to the IL
program.
• Collaborates with the SILC to provide appropriate level of Title I
Innovation and Expansion funds to support the full function of the SILC
through a Resource Plan, consistent with the SPIL, as well as through
appropriate IL State General Funds.
• Office space and equipment for SILC staff, including desks, filing
cabinets, computers for workstations, accommodations such as remote
computers used as workstations, general office supplies (i.e. paper,
postage for regular mail), utilities and services including phone, fax,
e-mail, internet, IT and website support, and copiers.
• Overhead costs related to SILC office space, and maintenance costs
on office equipment provided for SILC use.
Oregon Commission for the Blind’s Vocation Rehabilitation program also
supplies $1,800 annually of Title I Innovation and Expansion funds to
support the function of the SILC through its Resource Plan, consistent
with SPIL Section D – SILC Duties.
Section 24. SILC Duties
Page 89 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field Section 705(c)
Item 24.1-SILC Duties
Provide a summary of SILC activities conducted during the
reporting year related to the SILC's duties listed below : *State Plan Development:
• Completed draft SPIL
• Opened public comment period and held hearing on SPIL
• Reviewed and determined appropriate responses to input
• Received approval/signatures
• Submitted SPIL for Federal approval
Monitor, Review and Evaluate the Implementation of the Plan:
• Worked to obtain data/information needed and resolution for non-
functioning processes
• Used activity reports from program partners to measure/update progress
status
• Reviewed progress reports
Coordination with other Disability Councils:
• Maintained SILC representative positions on the State Rehabilitation
Council, and Oregon Disabilities Commission where many different disability
councils are also members.
• Served on numerous committees and work groups along with members of
other disability councils, as listed in Subpart V, Section B, Item 2 and Subpart
IV - Community Activities and Coordination, Section B - Working
Page 90 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Relationships Among Various Entities.
Public Meeting Requirements:
• Held quarterly public meetings, monthly committee meetings and the SPIL
hearing in accessible locations, providing requested disability
accommodations.
• Circulated advance meeting announcements to lists of interested parties
and disability organizations, with information about how to request
accommodations.
• Posted meeting announcements on the SILC’s website and on the
Oregon government transparency website.
24.1.1 State Plan Development
Describe any activities related to the joint development of the state
plan. Include any activities in preparation for developing the state
plan, such as needs assessments, evaluations of consumer
satisfaction, hearings and forums. *A joint SPIL Committee was formed, including the directors of each CIL and
members of the SILC. The President of the Association of Oregon CILs
(AOCIL) and the SILC’s Chairperson served as co-chairs. The Committee
completed preparation of draft state plan language that was recommended to
each CIL and the full SILC. After the language was approved, it was
distributed broadly for public review and comment. A formal hearing was
held, and input from the hearing and the public comment period was
Page 91 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
reviewed by the Committee. Recommendations were made to the CILs and
the full Council, which resulted in a plan being submitted and receiving
Federal approval.
In 2016, the SILC did not receive any consumer satisfaction data except from
Oregon Commission for the Blind’s consumers. Individual CILs evaluated
consumer satisfaction results in house, but did not share the data with the
SILC. The SILC is in the process of initiating a solicitation for consultation on
best practices in state plan evaluation, consumer satisfaction and needs
assessment. The results are expected to guide the SPIL Committee during
fiscal year 2017 to establish best practice approaches to those elements of
planning and evaluation.
24.1.2 Monitor, Review and Evaluate the Implementation of the State Plan
Describe any activities related to the monitoring, review and
evaluation of the implementation of the state plan. *There were many challenges to maintaining the SILC’s activities around
monitoring, review and evaluation of the state plan’s implementation, due to
restructuring of almost all state planning processes after the change in
signatories, created by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. In
addition, personnel changes within the DSU meant that some of the
established processes, which provided the SILC with information used in
monitoring and evaluating the state plan, were interrupted. For these
reasons, the SILC was unable to conduct its typical evaluation processes.
Work is being done to resolve these issues. Additionally, the anticipated
Page 92 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
consultation contract (mentioned in the prior section) is expected to guide
development of improved processes.
• The SILC continues to use a state plan dashboard where progress and
evaluation data is recorded, when available.
• Periodic state plan activity reports were provided by program partners, but
results were only received from the two DSUs. CIL reports were not
available.
• Surveys of program partners were used to measure progress on state
plan outcomes, and was periodically reviewed by the SILC.
24.1.3 Coordination With Other Disability Councils
Describe the SILC's coordination of activities with the State
Rehabilitation Council (SRC) established under section 105, if the
state has such a Council, or the commission described in section
101(a)(21)(A), if the state has such a commission, and councils that
address the needs of specific disability populations and issues
under other Federal law. Please state whether the SILC has at least
one representative serving as a member of the SRC and whether
the SILC has any members serving on other councils, boards or
commissions in the state. *The SILC has a representative serving on the SRC, who provides reports to
the SILC at quarterly meetings. The SILC worked with the SRC to draft a
section for the annual SRC report to the Rehabilitation Services
Administration, outlining the SILC partnership.
Page 93 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Information relevant to the SILC and SRC was routinely exchanged between
staff of the two councils, which share an office location. This allowed each
council to stay informed of current issues being addressed by each program.
More details about SILC affiliations with other councils, boards or
commissions are listed in Subpart V, Section B, Item 2 and Subpart IV -
Community Activities and Coordination, Section B - Working Relationships
Among Various Entities.
24.1.4 Public Meeting Requirements
Describe how the SILC has ensured that all regularly scheduled
meetings and other public hearings and forums hosted by the SILC
are open to the public and sufficient advance notice is provided. *Meetings of the SILC are posted on the Oregon Government Transparency
website, where meetings of all Oregon public bodies are listed. The meeting
calendar is also embedded in the SILC’s webpage. Advance meeting notices
are distributed via e-mail through a network of interested parties, which
includes interested individuals, the Centers for Independent Living, and
various disability service organizations including all State vocational
rehabilitation program staff, Tribal vocational rehabilitation programs, the
Consumer Assistance program, Aging and Disability Resource Connection
programs, etc. For SPIL public hearings, the same methods were used, as
well as posting public notices in appropriate newspapers.
Page 94 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
Item 24.2 - Other Activities
Describe any other SILC activities funded by non-Part B funds. *None to report.
Section 25. Training and Technical Assistance Needs Section 721(b)(3) of the Act
Training and Technical Assistance Needs
Choose up
to 10
Priority
Needs -
Rate items
1-10 with 1
being the
most
important
Advocacy/Leadership Development
General Overview
Community/Grassroots Organizing
Individual Empowerment
Page 95 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Systems Advocacy
Legislative Process
Applicable Laws
General overview and promulgation of
various disability laws
Americans with Disabilities Act
Air-Carrier's Access Act
Fair Housing Act
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Improvement Act
Medicaid/Medicare/PAS/waivers/long-term
care
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
Social Security Act
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
Page 96 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Ticket to Work and Work Incentives
Improvement Act of 1999
Government Performance Results Act of
1993
Assistive Technologies
General Overview
Data Collecting and Reporting
General Overview
704 Reports
Performance Measures contained in 704
Report
Dual Reporting Requirements
Case Service Record Documentation
Disability Awareness and Information
Specific Issues
Page 97 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Evaluation
General Overview
CIL Standards and Indicators
Community Needs Assessment
Consumer Satisfaction Surveys
Focus Groups
Outcome Measures 8
Financial: Grant Management
General Overview
Federal Regulations
Budgeting
Fund Accounting
Financial: Resource Development
Page 98 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
General Overview
Diversification of Funding Base
Fee-for-Service Approaches
For Profit Subsidiaries
Fund-Raising Events of Statewide
Campaigns
Grant Writing
Independent Living Philosophy
General Overview
Innovative Programs
Best Practices 5
Specific Examples 6
Management Information Systems
Computer Skills
Page 99 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Software
Networking Strategies
General Overview
Electronic 7
Among CILs & SILCs
Community Partners
Program Planning
General Overview of Program
Management and Staff Development
CIL Executive Directorship Skills Building
Conflict Management and Alternative
Dispute Resolution
First-Line CIL Supervisor Skills Building
IL Skills Modules
Page 100 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Peer Mentoring
Program Design
Time Management
Team Building
Outreach to Unserved/Underserved Populations
General Overview
Disability
Minority 2
Institutionalized Potential Consumers 1
Rural 3
Urban
SILC Roles/Relationship to CILs
General Overview
Page 101 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
Development of State Plan for
Independent Living
Implementation (monitor & review) of
SPIL
4
Public Meetings
Role and Responsibilities of Executive
Board
Role and Responsibilities of General
Members
Collaborations with In-State Stakeholders
CIL Board of Directors
General Overview
Roles and Responsibilities
Policy Development
Recruiting/Increasing Involvement
Page 102 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
Volunteer Programs
General Overview
Optional Areas and/or Comments (write-in) 9-Facilitating efficient meetings and managing multiple committees and work groups.
SPIL Comparison and Updates, Other Accomplishments and Challenges of the Reporting Year
Section 704(m)(4) of the Act
Section 26. Comparison of Reporting Year Activities with the SPIL
Item 26.1-Progress in Achieving Objectives and Goals
Describe progress made in achieving the objectives and goals
outlined in the most recently approved SPIL. Discuss goals
achieved and/or in progress as well as barriers encountered. *
The current SPIL’s goals involve the following:
• Supporting Independent Living services through effective funding
strategies
• Maximizing the reach and effectiveness of Independent Living
services
• Engaging consumers and Independent Living program staff in the
work of changing systems and attitudes to create a society consistent
Page 103 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
with Independent Living philosophy
Changes in federal law, including changing relationships among partners
in the IL program, and completion of state plan revisions continued to
reduce the focus of some partners in terms of implementing the current
plan.
Objective 1.1 is designed to improve how the DSU, SILC and Network of
CILs work together on tasks that support funding of IL services. Activities
focused on developing a set of tasks, time lines and partnership
expectations for two administrative functions:
• Development of a legislative IL program funding request each
biennium
• Development of a plan for distribution of IL program funding each
year
The activities for this objective have been completed. The goal was to
have 70% of the IL program partners satisfied with initial implementation
of protocols for IL program budget requests and for determination of
annual funding allocations in the first year of implementation, increasing
to 100% satisfaction by the end of the SPIL period. Partners did not
respond to data collection until this year, and only 13% were satisfied.
From information provided, it is clear there is not a full understanding of
the objective’s purpose. Additional conversations will be needed.
Objective 1.2 is designed so that IL program partners will use credible
data to develop funding strategies that maximize the number of
geographic regions receiving IL services. Activities focused on:
• Using measurable performance data to support state budget requests
Page 104 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
for IL program funding
• Having adequate data to develop the SPIL’s strategies for funding
CILs
Much of the work to develop data for funding strategies was delayed, as
work went into development of the next SPIL. The goals were to have
100% of state budget requests for the Independent Living program
funding supported by measurable performance data and 80% of IL
partners believing there was adequate data to support development of
CIL funding strategies identified in the State Plan.
There were changes in staffing and roles between the DSU and CIL’s
that hindered measurable reporting data between the entities.
Since development of CIL funding strategies was postponed to the next
SPIL period, data was not available to measure the adequacy of data
supporting the strategies.
Objective 2.1 is designed to examine and implement feasible
innovations and modernizations in service models, with a focus on
extending the reach and effectiveness of services within CIL service
areas.
This objective was being led by the Centers for Independent Living. From
conversations with CIL directors, it was determined that the activities for
this objective were sidelined due to transition of key personnel, and
higher priority activities.
Objective 2.2 is designed to increase implementation of identified
effective practices for CIL administration.
Page 105 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
CIL narrative data was clear that the intended outcome was achieved.
Objective 2.3 is designed to increase collaborations with other service
systems so that service delivery is improved.
This objective was exceeded. It called for 60% of CILs to implement a
new structured agreement with one or more partner service systems.
The achievement rate was calculated at 85%.
Item 26.2 - SPIL Information Updates
If applicable, describe any changes to the information contained in
the SPIL that occurred during the reporting year, including the
placement, legal status, membership or autonomy of the SILC; the
SILC resource plan, the design of the statewide network of centers;
and the DSU administration of the SILS program. *
None to report.
Section 27. Significant Activities and Accomplishments
Page 106 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
If applicable, describe any significant activities and
accomplishments achieved by the DSU and SILC not included
elsewhere in the report, e.g. brief summaries of innovative
practices, improved service delivery to consumers, etc. *
Back in the 2015, Legislative session OCB received Legislative approval
to hire three new Rehabilitation Instructor positions based upon
demonstrating, through OCB’s service demand data, that there was an
unmet need for service by OCB’s consumers. Our service model for both
ILOB and IL Part B consumers has been refined in order to better
manage unexpected demands for increased services, as different OCB
service regions experience increasing wait times. OCB’s service model
now involves having seven fixed region Rehabilitation Instructors and two
Itinerant Rehabilitation Instructors who will travel to the regions with the
highest service demands at any particular time, or will back-fill when an
Instructor is on vacation, or out for an extended period of illness. OCB
has now hired all three of the new Rehabilitation Instructors. One was
added as a fixed region Instructor to Portland, which has the largest
service demand. This are needs two fixed region Instructors in order to
meet typical consumer demands. Of the two itinerant positions, we have
consistently been able to keep one of those positions filled and have only
recently refilled the second itinerant position.
OCB has worked hard to continue to implement agency-wide
performance measures, which involve all agency programs. A problem
solving team has focused on identifying potential ways of increasing
Page 107 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
direct service hours of Rehabilitation Instructors to our consumers.
Recommendations are being developed. Any improvements ultimately
gained in this area will benefit both ILOB and IL Part B consumers.
In terms of the overall IL program, we consider it a major achievement to
have completed development and approval of a new SPIL with much
improved engagement from CILs and community partners. Working
together on the State Plan has also given opportunity to improve and
build relationships between CILs, SILC and OCB as a service provider.
This took considerable investments in time and energy. We now look
forward to continuing this improved engagement during implementation
phases of the new plan, and expect it will lead to more ownership and
achievement of planned SPIL activities.
Section 28. Substantial Challenges
If applicable, describe any substantial problems encountered by the
DSU and SILC, not included elsewhere in this report, and discuss
resolutions/attempted resolutions, e.g., difficulty in outreach
efforts; disagreements between the SILC and the DSU;
complications recruiting SILC members; complications working
with other state agencies or organizations within the state. *
Page 108 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
During 2016, OCB experience several staff changes within the IL
program. The second Itinerant Rehabilitation Instructor was not able to
be fully utilized during the first year. It took a couple of months to fill that
position and then shortly before the individual had completed training and
was able to be fully deployed, they accepted an internal promotion and
the position had to be recruited for a second time in the same Federal
Fiscal year. This position was refilled mid-September, 2016.
Another challenge results from the Federal government not wanting to
support the development of homemakers within the Vocational
Rehabilitation (VR) program. Our agency had terminated its support of
the development of homemaker goals in VR as of the end of FFY 2015.
OCB used to be able to provide more extensive staff and equipment
services to homemakers because the VR program funding is much more
robust than for our Independent Living programs. OCB anticipated
getting more referrals to our IL Part B program starting in FFY 2016 as a
result of this change, but OCB would not be able to provide the same
level of support as provided through the VR program. This has, indeed,
been the case. The bulk of the work demand for Part B has landed in
OCB’s Portland region, although there have been Part B consumers
served throughout Oregon.
In regard to SPIL planning and implementation, it takes a considerable
amount of time and energy to achieve the level of involvement desired. It
is a challenge for people who have other responsibilities to commit that
kind of time to planning and carrying out the plan. The complexity and
scope of the IL program requires significant effort and cost, and is difficult
to achieve on very limited budgets. SILC members often have multiple
Page 109 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required field
expectations placed on them, which could nearly take as much time as a
part time job.
Section 29. Additional Information
Include any additional information, suggestions, comments or
explanations not included elsewhere in the report. *
Oregon Commission for the Blind: As of FFY 2016 the Commission’s
IL Director position is back to a full-time position and it is its own
separate program, reporting directly to the agency director.
Because of the various staff changes in filling vacancies for existing and
new positions, there continues to be a need for training of new staff and
increasing the skills of current staff. In addition, it is anticipated that a
new VR Case Management Application (in which all consumer data is
entered) will be implemented within the next year and half, which will also
require more training for all employees of the agency. OCB is beginning
the pre-work necessary for a smooth transition to the new application.
Page 110 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/
* - Required inputSignatures
I, SILC, confirm that the information provided in this report is true,
complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
I, DSE, confirm that the information provided in this report is true,
complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
NAME AND TITLE OF SILC CHAIRPERSON*
Tony Ellis, Chairperson
NAME AND TITLE OF DSE CHAIRPERSON*
Trina M. Lee, Vocational Rehabilitation Program Director
Page 111 of 111Report
3/24/2017https://reporting-pilot.acl.gov/