it’s the data that makes a paper joerg heber executive editor nature communications

20
It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Upload: nathan-boyd

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

It’s the data that makes a paper

Joerg HeberExecutive Editor

Nature Communications

Page 2: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Science is based on trust.

Page 4: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Trust in published data used to be much higher

Prior to scientific journals, scientists published books – with no editor involved in the process

Journals have editors but started to use peer review predominantly only in the 20th century

Evidence still taken at face value

Page 5: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Would we publish a paper today having only this data?

Page 6: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

We should (with more data…) This was the report of the first laser. The

full paper is less than a printed page.

Nature 187, 493-494 (1960)

Page 8: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Proper data handling is important

• Establishes priority

• Supports the research findings

• Helps to reproduce the outcome

Data needs to be archived and made accessible

• Helps with further research

Page 9: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Without proper data handling things can go wrong…

Page 10: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Data sharing advances science

Page 11: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Data sharing is in the public interest

We encourage our authors to share data related to public health emergencies as soon as possible, even prior to peer review or publication.

Nature 518, 477–479 (2015)

Page 13: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Funders can mandate data depositionThe UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) now expects data deposition upon publication.

Principles

EPSRC’s Charter is to support high-quality basic, strategic and applied research and related post-graduate training in engineering and the physical sciences, and to communicate and disseminate the resulting outcomes and knowledge. As such, EPSRC believes that the following guiding principles, which are aligned with the agreed RCUK principles on sharing of research data, should inform all decisions relating to the management of all research data that has arisen as a result of EPSRC funding:

i. EPSRC-funded research data is a public good produced in the public interest and should be made freely and openly available with as few restrictions as possible in a timely and responsible manner.

ii. EPSRC recognises that there are legal, ethical and commercial constraints on release of research data. To ensure that the research process (including the collaborative research process) is not damaged by inappropriate release of data, research organisation policies and practices should ensure that these constraints are considered at all stages in the research process.

iii. Sharing research data is an important contributor to the impact of publicly funded research. To recognise the intellectual contributions of researchers who generate, preserve and share key research datasets, all users of research data should acknowledge the sources of their data and abide by the terms and conditions under which they are accessed.

iv. EPSRC-funded researchers should be entitled to a limited period of privileged access to the data they collect to allow them to work on and publish their results. The length of this period will depend on the scientific discipline and the nature of the research.

v. Institutional and project specific data management policies and plans should be in accordance with relevant standards and community best practice and should exist for all data. Data with acknowledged long term value should be preserved and remain accessible and useable for future research.

vi. Sufficient metadata should be recorded and made openly available to enable other researchers to understand the potential for further research and re-use of the data. Published results should always include information on how to access the supporting data.

https

://w

ww

.eps

rc.a

c.uk

/abo

ut/s

tand

ards

/res

earc

hdat

a/pr

inci

ples

/

Page 15: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Technology supports a data infrastructure

This is how part of the structured header of the same paper looks like in our database. Data mentions in a paper can be made machine-readable Papers are not just for reading, but also for text and data mining

{ "article": { "id": "ncomms8031", "type": "articles", "title": "Coherent perfect absorption in deeply subwavelength films in the single-photon regime", "titleXml": "<article-title>Coherent perfect absorption in deeply subwavelength films in the single-photon regime</article-title>", "publicationDate": "2015-05-20", "publicationYear": "2015", "publicationYearMonth": "2015-05", "number": "7031", "volume": "6", "doi": "10.1038/ncomms8031", "homepage": "http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150505/ncomms8031/full/ncomms8031.html", "doiLink": "http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8031", "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/", "hasPdfAsset": { "type": "pdf-assets", "id": "ncomms8031.pdf", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "path": "./ncomms/2015/150505/ncomms8031/pdf/ncomms8031.pdf" },

http://hub.nature.com/docs/api/

Page 16: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Reproducibility issues

• Statistics• Materials, reagents, cell lines• Animals and their welfare• Human subjects• Experimental methods

Sharing data improves the reproducibility of experimental results.

Page 17: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

ReproducibilityWe have checklists for a number of research areas to improve the reproducibility of research findings.

http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/checklist.pdf

Page 18: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Papers form part of a larger ecosystem

A single paper represents only a fraction of a researcher’s output. It usually only tells one aspect of a larger story.

There is a benefit in sharing data from different labs and to build data repositories: chemical compounds, protein structures, genetic sequences etc.

We support publication of data in such repositories For recommended repositories see:

http://www.nature.com/sdata/data-policies/repositories

Page 19: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Data is only useful if it can be assessed and reused

Data needs structure and descriptionsThose that create and curate data need to get

creditData items should be citable and should count

as an integral part of the scientific literatureScientific Data is a solution to provide credit

for data description

Page 20: It’s the data that makes a paper Joerg Heber Executive Editor Nature Communications

Thank you!

Data sharing is beautiful.

https://flic.kr/p/8o4YaW