j044 1998 2811 - science.go.kr · 6b0178 gh ij Ðîî'ï8uvðÅñØ îîòÐîîó'ï8uvðÅð2...
TRANSCRIPT
-
44
-
-
................................................................................................. 1
................................................................................................. 1
................................................................................................. 2
.......................................................................................... 2
........................................................................................................................ 4
1 . ..................................................................................................... 4
2 . .................................................................................................... 4
3 . ........................................................................................................... 5
4. 5A ........................... 6
5. ................................. 15
.................................................................................................................. 23
.............................................................................. 24
.................................................................................................. 25
-
- 1 -
.
.
,
.
(, , ,
) ,
, ,
.
? .
. 5A
.
1.
2. 5A (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
1)
2)
3)
4) - , ,
5) SEM,TEM
3. (,, )
1) LB media 2ml -
E.coli(, )
1416 (600nm) OD
2) -
disk (1)
Nutrient agar petri dish E.coli disk
(1)
3)
-
- 2 -
.
1996 . 12 . 31
1997 . 1 . 1 1998 . 3 . 31 1998 . 4 . 1 1998 . 4 . 30 data 1998 . 5 . 1 1998 . 5 . 20 1998 . 5 . 21 1998 . 6 . 1 1998 . 6 . 2 1998 . 6 . 7 1998 . 6 . 8 1998 . 6 . 10 1998 . 8 . 15 1998 . 8 . 23 44
. (zeolite) 1756 Baron Von Cronsted
aluminosilicate ,
. "Zeo(
) litos() zeolite(boiling stone)
. Molecular Sieve()
. .
, 40
Clinoptilolite, Mordenite, Heulandite, Chabazite, Phillipsite,
Faujasite and Analcime . Clinoptilolite
, , , ,
, , , , .
clinoptilolite ,
, ,
.
2
.
1945 union carbide Milton Linde A A
X Y
120 .
, cracking, , ,
, ,
, , ,
.
-
- 3 -
, .
M2/nO.Al2O3.xSiO2.yH2O (M: )
TO4 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 4, 5, 6,
8, 12 ring 24 TO4 sodalite cage
.
.
Si4+ Al3+ (isomorphous substitution)
Al
.
(cation site) .
.
Fig1. 5A A
Fig. 1 5A sodalite cage D4R
4.1 8 ring .
,
. OH
. Activity
.
metal hole
. hole M(OH)n
M-O-(M-O)n- hole
.
.
-
- 4 -
.
.
,
,
. (Borja, R 1994)
. (Wistreich GA 1968, 1972)
.
- .
.
1.
1)
(1)
Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+
(2)
[Ag(py)2]+, [Ag(NH3)2]SO4, [Cu(NH3)4](NO3)2
2)
Spectrophotometer(ultrospec )
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer(SHIMADZU AA-600)
. .
(furnace)
SEM, TEM,
( )
2.
(1) 4A
Al(OH)3 + NaSiO35H2O + Ca2+ Ca2+(SiAl)O4
-
- 5 -
(2) 5A
4A
H2O 1015wt%
1% H2SO4 pH pH = 5
CaCl2 20wt% 70, 4
(zeolite 3)
cake 120, 8 600650, 4
5A
3.
(1) [Ag(py)2]+
AgNO3 17g 70ml , 50ml
.
.
.(
)
.
(NaClO4 H2O : 140.46) 18g( 1H2O
21g) 20ml .
10 .
30ml 6
.
( ) .
(2) [Ag(NH3)2]SO4
AgNO3 17g .
1M H2SO4 50ml Ag2SO4() .
Sand bath NO2
.
-
- 6 -
.
[Ag(NH3)2]SO4 .
5% .
(3) [Cu(NH3)4](NO3)2
Cu(NO3)2
.
.
[Cu(NH3)4](NO3)2 .
.
4. 5A
1) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
(1) Ag+
5A 6g .
45.02 PPM AgNO3 20ml .
30, 60, 90, 180, 240, 300 70
.
10ml AA
Ag+ .
Table 3. Ag+
( : 6g, : 70, : 45.02 PPM)
() (PPM) (%) 45.02 0.0030 23.52 48.8760 18.34 59.2690 13.14 70.81180 0.715 98.41 240 0.272 99.40300 0.113 99.75
(2) Cu2+
5A 6g .
18.43 PPM CuSO4 20ml .
-
- 7 -
30, 60, 90, 180, 240, 300 70
.
10ml AA .
Table 4. Cu2+
( : 6g, : 70, : 18.43 PPM)
() (PPM) (%) 18.43 0.0030 13.34 27.6260 10.17 44.8290 10.05 45.47180 0.059 99.67 240 0.053 99.73300 0.060 99.67
(3) Zn2+
5A 6g .
13.87M Zn(NO3)2 20ml .
30, 60, 90, 180, 240, 300 70
.
10ml AA Zn2+
.
Table 5. Zn2+
( : 6g, : 70, : 13.87 PPM)
() (PPM) (%) 13.87 0.0030 7.628 45.0060 7.515 45.8290 7.344 47.05180 7.148 48.46240 4.733 65.88 300 4.733 65.88
(4) Fe3+ ( )
5A 6g .
0.01M Fe(NO3)3 20ml .
30, 60, 90, 180, 240, 300 70
-
- 8 -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 30 60 90 180 240 300
()
(%)
.
10ml AA
.
Table 6. Fe3+
() (PPM) 30 47.2960 1.882 90 0.851 180 0.488 , 240 0.402 300 0.335
(5)
Fig2. ( 6g, 70)
4
. Ag+> Cu2+> Zn2+ .
Fe3+
. Ag+> Cu2+> Zn2+>Fe3+
.
.
-
- 9 -
2) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
(1) 5A Ag+
.
45.02 PPM AgNO3 20ml .
70 4 .
10ml 0.1M NaCl
10ml .
AA Ag+ .
Table 7. Ag+ (
: 4, : 70, : 45.02 PPM)
5A
(g)(PPM) (%)
45.02 0.00
1.2 23.65 47.47
3.2 14.99 66.70
4.4 0.921 97.96
5.6 0.441 99.02
6.8 0.331 99.27
8.0 0.241 99.47
(2) Cu2+ ()
5A
.
18.43 PPM CuSO4 20ml .
70 4 .
10ml AA .
-
- 10 -
Table 8. Cu2+ ( :
4, : 70, : 18.43 PPM)
5A
(g)(PPM) (%)
18.43 0.00
4.8 0.248 98.64
5.6 0.148 99.17
6.8 0.080 99.57
8.0 0.075 99.62
10.0 0.070 99.63
12.0 0.047 99.74
(3) Zn2+
.
13.87 PPM Zn(NO3)2 20ml .
70 4 .
10ml AA
Zn2+ .
Table 9. Zn2+
5A
(g)(PPM) (%)
13.87 0.00
6.0 4.733 65.88
8.0 3.969 71.38
10.0 3.204 76.90
12.0 3.093 77.70
14.0 2.699 80.54
16.0 3.009 78.30
(4) Fe3+ ()
.
0.01M Fe(NO3)3 20ml .
70 4 .
10ml AA .
-
- 11 -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 3.2 4.8 6 8 12
zeolite (g)
(%)
Table 10. Fe3+
5A
(g)(PPM)
15.0 0.339
18.0 0.217
21.0 0.199
24.0 0.192
27.0 0.098
30.0 0.068
(5) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
Fig 3. (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
( : 4, : 70)
Fig 3 Ag+> Cu2+> Zn2+
Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+ 10g, 16g, 24g, 36g
.
3) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
(1) Ag+
5A 6g .
45.02 PPM AgNO3 20ml .
30, 50, 60, 70, 80
4 .
10ml AA Ag+
-
- 12 -
Table 11. Ag+
() (PPM) (%) 45.02 0.0030 1.926 95.7250 0.172 98.0660 0.138 99.69 70 0.095 99.7980 0.091 99.80
(2) Cu2+ ()
5A 6g .
18.43 PPM CuSO4 20ml .
30, 50, 60, 70, 80
4 .
10ml AA .
Table 12. Cu2+
() (PPM) (%) 18.43 0.0030 0.404 92.7750 0.229 93.6760 0.178 93.94 70 0.173 93.9680 0.126 94.20
(3) Zn2+
5A 6g .
10.96 PPM Zn(NO3)2 20ml .
30, 50, 60, 70, 80
4 .
10ml AA Zn2+
.
Table 13. Zn2+
-
- 13 -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 30 50 60 70 80
(%)
() (PPM) (%) 18.37 0.0030 6.831 62.8150 6.729 63.3760 5.982 67.4470 4.733 74.24 80 4.320 76.78
(4) Fe3+ ()
5A 6g .
0.01M Fe(NO3)3 20ml .
30, 50, 60, 70, 80
4 .
10ml AA .
Table 14. Fe3+
() (%) 30 17.9650 1.17360 0.47670 0.27280 0.270
(5) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
Fig 4. (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
Fig 4 Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+ 6
070 . 70
.
-
- 14 -
6
4) 5A
5A
(H2O) 6080,4,()
23 1% H2SO4
pH=5, 70, 4(, )
( 23 3)
120, 8
600650, 4
-
5) SEM
5.1. SEM
Fig 5. Ag+ SEM Fig 6. Cu(NH3)42+ SEM
-
- 15 -
Fig7. Ag(NH3)42+ TEM Fig8. Cu(NH3)4
2+ TEM
5.
( : , , , )
1) LB media
(1) LB media
NaCl 10g
Trypton 10g 1L .
Yerst extract 5g
(2) LB media 2ml cap
.
(3) cap - 1g
, 37 1416 .
, , .
(- cap
.)
(4) Spectrophotometer 600nm OD
.
(OD 600nm )
-
- 16 -
88.17 85.61
63.72
50.68 47.51 45.27
2.890
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Zeolite (4 , Zn )
%
1
Table 15. -
(- 1g)
- OD()
OD
1 2 3
1 AgNO3 4 0.154 0.349 0.258 0.254 88.17%
2 [Ag(NH3)2]+ 4 0.213 0.408 0.306 0.309 85.61%
3 [Ag(py)2]+ 4 0.931 0.692 0.714 0.779 63.72%
4 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ 4 0.950 1.179 1.049 1.059 50.68%
5 CuSO4 4 0.957 1.198 1.225 1.127 47.51%
6 Zn(NO3)2 1.177 1.188 1.161 1.175 45.27%
7 Fe(NO3)3 4 2.109 1.873 2.272 2.085 2.89%
8 Control 2.149 2.168 2.124 2.147
Fig 9. -
(- 1g)
: 1. AgNO3 2. [Ag(NH3)2]+ 3. [Ag(py)2]
+ 4. [Cu(NH3)4]2+
5. CuSO4 6. Zn(NO3)2 7. Fe(NO3)3
Table 15 Fig 9 Ag Cu, Zn Fe
. .
-Ag or Ag AgNO3> AgNO3 2
> AgNO3 4 , AgNO3> [Ag(NH3)2]+ -
.
Zn(NO3)2
.
-
- 17 -
69.25 68.14
48.554.08 50.95
20.33
00
20
40
60
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
zeolite (4 , Zn)
%
1
Table 16.
( 1g)
or-
OD()
OD
1 2 3
1 AgNO3 4 0.579 0.644 0.778 0.667 69.25%
2 [Ag(NH3)2]+ 4 0.618 0.741 0.714 0.691 68.14%
3 [Ag(py)2]+ 4 1.139 1.291 0.920 1.117 48.50%
4 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ 4 0.963 1.107 0.917 0.996 54.08%
5 CuSO4 4 1.125 1.102 0.966 1.064 50.95%
6 Zn(NO3)2 1.726 1.735 1.723 1.728 20.33%
7 Fe(NO3)3 4 2.103 2.421 2.266 2.263 0.00%
8 Control 2.174 2.128 2.205 2.169
Fig 10. -
: 1. AgNO3 2. [Ag(NH3)2]+ 3. [Ag(py)2]
+ 4. [Cu(NH3)4]2+
5. CuSO4 6. Zn(NO3)2 7. Fe(NO3)3
Table 16 Fig 10 AgNO3
[Ag(NH3)2]+, [Ag(py)2]
+, [Cu(NH3)4]2+ CuSO4 .
Zn(NO3)2 Fe(NO3)3
.
.
-
- 18 -
67.67 67.54 67.54
54.9349.18 49.49
4.33
0
20
40
60
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Zeolite (4 , Zn)
%
1
Table 17. -
(- 1g)
or-
OD()
OD
1 2 3
1 AgNO3 4 0.637 0.763 0.793 0.731 67.67%
2 [Ag(NH3)2]+ 4 0.797 0.715 0.690 0.734 67.54%
3 [Ag(py)2]+ 4 0.758 0.744 0.701 0.734 67.54%
4 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ 4 0.928 1.007 1.122 1.019 54.93%
5 CuSO4 4 1.215 1.082 1.150 1.149 49.18%
6 Zn(NO3)2 1.197 1.128 1.101 1.142 49.49%
7 Fe(NO3)3 4 2.134 2.323 2.031 2.163 4.33%
8 Control 2.297 2.178 2.308 2.261
Fig 11. () -
: 1. AgNO3 2. [Ag(NH3)2]+ 3. [Ag(py)2]
+ 4. [Cu(NH3)4]2+
5. CuSO4 6. Zn(NO3)2 7. Fe(NO3)3
Table 17 Fig 11
.
-
- 19 -
2) Agar plate
(1) -
(2) disk 2 , 1ml
. 35 .
(3) - 1g
1 disk .
(4) - disk
3 .
(5) Nutrient agar
Beef extract 3g
Peptone 5g 1L
Agar. 15g .
(6) Nutrient agar 65 petri dish
. Nutrient agar
. (petri dish
. 3.2.7 3.2.8 )
(7) (E. coli) 3.2.6 petri
dish Nutrient agar .
(8) petri dish 3.2.4 disk 45
.
(9)
.
-
- 20 -
Fig 12. petri dish -
disk
Table 18. -
(+ )
-
-
0.01g 0.1g
1 AgNO3 4 +++ ++++
2 AgNO3 2 ++ +++
3 AgNO3 + +++
4 [Ag(NH3)2]+ 4 ++ +++
5 [Ag(NH3)2]+ ++ +++
6 [Ag(py)2]+ 4 ++ +++
7 [Ag(py)2]+ ++ +++
8 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ 4 ++
9 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ +
10 CuSO4 4 +
11 CuSO4 +
-
- 21 -
Table 18
- .
Table 19. -
- ( 0.1g)
-
1 AgNO3 4 ++++
2 AgNO3 2 +++
3 AgNO3 +++
4 [Ag(NH3)2]+ 4 +++
5 [Ag(NH3)2]+ +++
6 [Ag(py)2]+ 4 +++
7 [Ag(py)2]+ +++
8 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ 4 ++
9 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ ++
10 CuSO4 4 ++
11 CuSO4 ++
12 Zn(NO3)4 ++
13 Zn(NO3)4 4 ++
14 Fe(NO3)3 4 +
15 Fe(NO3)3 +
, , ,
, , ,
-
- 22 -
Table 20. -
-(0.1g)
-
1 AgNO3 4 ++++
2 AgNO3 2 +++
3 AgNO3 +++
4 [Ag(NH3)2]+ 4 +++
5 [Ag(NH3)2]+ +++
6 [Ag(py)2]+ 4 +++
7 [Ag(py)2]+ +++
8 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ 4 ++
9 [Cu(NH3)4]2+ ++
10 CuSO4 4 ++
11 CuSO4 ++
12 Zn(NO3)4 ++
13 Zn(NO3)4 4 ++
14 Fe(NO3)3 4
15 Fe(NO3)3
, ,
.
3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
-
- 23 -
. 1. 5A
(1) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
4 Ag+> Cu2+>Zn2+
>Fe3+ .
.
(2) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+
8g, 16g, 24g, 36g.
(3) (Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+)
Ag+, Cu2+, Zn2+ 6070
.
(4) SEM TEM
SEM .
TEM .
2.
(1) LB media
AgNO3, [Ag(NH3)2]+, [Ag(py)2]
+, [Cu(NH3)4]2+, CuSO4, Zn(NO3)2,
Fe(NO3)3 - 4
.
- (4),
, -
OD .
.
Zn(NO3)2
.
OD 600nm .
Ag+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+ > Fe3+. Ag+
, Cu2+ , Fe3+
.
-
- 24 -
(2) Agar plate
Ag+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+ > Fe3+. Ag+
, Cu2+ , Fe3+
.
(3)
Ag+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+ > Fe3+. Ag+
, Cu2+ , Fe3+
.
- , ,
.
. Gruzina TG (1997)
ATPase
ATPase . Brynhil
-dsen L & Rosswall T (1989)
,
.
Ag
Ag coating (Stickler DJ , 1996; Ahearn
DJ , 1995). Ag
.
. 1. -
.
2.
.
3.
.
-
- 25 -
.
1. ,,. 1996.
. 18(5) : 587-602.
2. ,. 1995.
. 9 : 159-167.
3. ,,,. 1996.
. (KOR) 7(1) : 43-50.
4. ,. 1995. A .
(KOR) 5(7) : 897-902.
5. ,. 1993.
. (KOR) 15(6) : 743-753.
6. ,, 1993. .
(KOR) 26(6) : 285-290.
7. ,,. 1993. .
(KOR) 26(6) : 334-340.
8. ,. 1992.
(). (KOR) 15(2) : 6-37.
1992.
(). (KOR) 16(1) :
9. ,,,,. 1993.
. (KOR) 30(3) : 183-189.
10. . 1981. .
3 : 23-32.
11. . 8( ). . 1977.
12. . 1994. -Na2Si2O5
. .
13. f.a.cotton, g.wilkinson. basic inorganic chemistry. 1983.
14. geoffrey pass, haydn sutcliffe. Experimental Inorganic Chemistry chapman
and hall. 1983.
15. Westreich,G.A., Lechtman,M.D., Baker,R.F. and Bartholomew,J.W. 1972.
Distruption of chemically killed bacterial cells by a synthetic zeolite.
Appl. Microbiol. 23(1): 155-157.
16. Gruzina,T.G.,Balakina,M.N., Karamushka,V.I., Stepura,L.G. and Ul'berg,Z.R.
1997. Bacterial cell membrane ATPase in assessing heavy metal
toxicity. Mikrobiologiia 66(1):14-18.
-
- 26 -
17. Cohen,I., Bitan,R. and Nitzan,Y. 1991. The effect of zinc and cadmium ions
on Escherichia coli B.. Microbios. 68 (276-277): 157-168.
18. Brynhildsen,L. and Rosswall,T. 1989. Effects of cadmium, copper, magnesiu
-m and zinc on the decomposition of citrate by a Klebsiella sp.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55 (6): 1375-1379.
19. Stickler,D.J., Morris,N.S. and Williams,T.J. 1996. An assessment of the
ability of a silver-releasing device to prevent bacterial contamination of
urethral catheter drainage systems. Br, J. Urol. 78(4): 579-588.
20. Ahearn,D.G., May,L.L. and Gabriel,M.M. 1995. Adherence of organisms to
silver-coated surfaces. J. Ind. Microbiol. 15(4): 372-376.
21. Deshpande,L.M. and Chopade,B.A. 1994. Plasmid mediated silver resistance
in Acinetobacter baumannii. Biometals 7(1): 49-56.
22. Gabriel,M.M., Sawant,A.D., Simmons,R.B. and Ahearn,D.G. 1995. Effects of
silver on adherence of bacteria to urinary catheters: in vitro studies.
Curr. Microbiol. 30 (1): 17-22.
23. Borja,R. and Banks,C.J. 1994. Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of soft drink
wastewater in immobilized cell bioreactor. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
60(3): 327-334.