janine mcilwraith - slater and gordon lawyers - litigation based policy against evidence based...
TRANSCRIPT
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
1
Project titleDate Month 2014
International Surrogacy23 June 2015
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
2
Commissioning parents, WA couple, David & Wendy Farrell
Surrogate mother, Pattaramon Chanbua, 21yo Thai national
Pregnant with twins
One foetus diagnosed as carrying Down’s Syndrome
Intended parents requested selective termination but surrogate
refused
Baby girl healthy – brought back to Australia by intended parents
Baby boy, Gammy, born with Down’s Syndrome, left in Thailand
with surrogate mother
Surrogate mother impoverished and reportedly
paid $16K
David Farrell reportedly had 22 child sex
convictions including unlawful and indecent
dealing with girls as young as 7yo
Baby Gammy
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
5
o ‘surrogacy agreement’ - NSW
o a formal or informal agreement whereby a woman agrees to
become or try to become pregnant, or a pregnant woman agrees,
that a child born as a result of the pregnancy is to be treated as a
child of another person (whether by adoption, agreement or
otherwise) or custody or care is to be transferred to another person.
o ‘commercial surrogacy agreement’ - where a fee or reward is to be
paid to the woman who gives birth, or intends to give birth, to the
child the subject of a surrogacy agreement.
Definitions
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
6
Surrogate mother lives in an overseas country
Can be commercial or altruistic
International surrogacy
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
7
Traditional – artificial insemination of the surrogate with either the
intended father’s sperm or the sperm of a donor
Gestational – IVF using the intended mother’s or a donor oocyte
Types
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
8
World Bank Indian surrogacy alone will be a US $2.5 billion by 2020
Majority of intended parents seek gestational surrogacy
2013 – about 400 Australian children born through surrogacy in
Thailand
Surrogacy arrangements in Australia estimated by AIHW 16 births
in 2010 (incl NZ)
Former Dept Immigration & Citizenship estimated in 2008 that there
were >100 cases of international surrogacy per year
Surrogacy Australia estimated in 2011, 45 Australian babies born in
the USA, 45 in Thailand and 315 in India
Scope
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
9
1978 – first test tube baby, Louise Brown
1980 – first surrogacy contract
1985 – a woman carried the first successful gestational surrogate
pregnancy
1986 - “baby M” born in the USA
“once embryo transfer technology is developed, the surrogate
industry could look for breeders – not only in poverty-stricken parts
of the United States, but in the Third World as well. There, perhaps
one tenth the current fee could be paid women” (Corea, 1985: 215)
New?
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
12
(ACT) Parentage Act 2004
(NSW) Surrogacy Act 2010
(QLD) Surrogacy Act 2010
(SA) Family Relationships Act 1975 Pt IIB
(TAS) Surrogacy Act 2012
(VIC) Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008
(WA) Surrogacy Act 2008
Legislation
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
13
Altruistic surrogacy is legal in most states and territories
All jurisdictions prohibit commercial surrogacy arrangements
In Victoria, the regulation of surrogacy comes under the umbrella of
assisted reproductive treatment legislation so that where a woman
seeks medical assistance to carry a surrogate pregnancy the
provisions of the (VIC) Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008
are invoked, however, if medical assistance is not required these
stringent requirements are avoided
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
14
ACT – ‘commercial substitute parent agreement’ is illegal
NSW – ‘surrogacy arrangement’ is not enforceable
Qld – ‘surrogacy arrangement’ is not enforceable
SA – ‘surrogacy contract’ and ‘procuration contract’ are illegal & void
Vic – ‘surrogacy arrangement’ is void & unenforceable
Tas – ‘surrogacy arrangement’ is unenforceable
WA – ‘surrogacy arrangement’ is not enforceable
Status of surrogacy arrangement
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
15
In NSW, ACT and Qld it is an offence for a resident of that state or
territory to enter into an international commercial surrogacy
arrangement
Penalty can be fine or imprisonment
Extraterratorial application will “give effect to the policy position
agreed by all States and Territories in Australia that commercial
surrogacy is not supported in this country. We all know that the
desire to be a parent is very powerful. That instinct is an important
part of humanity’s survival. However, in this brave new world we
must protect everybody involved, including the surrogate mother . . I
acknowledge the sadness of people who cannot realise that dream.
However, gaining access to children by circumventing local laws
and travelling overseas to engage the services of private clinics and
then bring the children back to Australia is not a practice that we as
lawmakers of this State should encourage” (Burney, Minister for
Community Services)
Extraterritorial application
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
16
Surrogate mother may have parental responsibility for the child she
gave birth to regardless of whether she has a biological connection,
is listed on the birth certificate or is considered to have parental
responsibility under local law
At common law, the general principles relating to the welfare of
children will apply to any child born as the result of a surrogacy
arrangement
Most Australian jurisdictions have legislated to provide for the
transfer of parentage of children born of surrogacy arrangements
where certain requirements are met (those requirements won’t be
met in the case of international surrogacy arrangements)
Some jurisdictions much more prescriptive than others
Parentage
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
17
Cth legislation
s 60HB Children born under surrogacy arrangements applies only
to domestic surrogacy arrangements where the intending parents
have already obtained a parentage order
Where surrogacy arrangements have not met the requirements of
the State or Territory concerned, applications have been brought to
the family court
Family Law Act
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
18
Application for parentage order by intending parents of twins born to
a surrogate mother in Thailand
Intending father was the biological father
Commercial surrogacy arrangement utilised was not permitted in
Qld meaning they couldn’t obtain parentage orders
Watts J made orders giving the intended parents “parental
responsibility”
Dudley & Chedi [2011] FamCA 502
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
19
International surrogacy
Intended father was biological father
Ryan J found that it was in the best interests of the children for a
declaration of parentage to be made
Ellison and Anor & Karnchanit [2012] FamCA 602
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
20
Ryan J took a different approach and agreed with Watts J in Dudley
& Chedi that there is no power under the Family Law Act to make a
declaration of parentage in favour of a biological father in an
overseas surrogacy arrangement
Mason & Mason [2013] FamCA 424
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
21
Jurisdictional issues – legislative power
Public policy considerations
Illegality of intended parent’s conduct
Exploitation of surrogates
Best interests of child
Chief Justice of the Family Court: although there is always a risk of
exploitation in commercial surrogacy arrangements, the best
interests of the children ‘will most often be served by recognising
the children born as a result of commercial surrogacy arrangements
as children of the commissioning parents”
Considerations
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
22
Requires coordinated international regulatory response
Pending such an agreement, most appropriate way to protect the
interests of children born as a result of international surrogacy
arrangements is to enact Cth law providing the family courts with a
discretionary power to transfer parentage from the birth mother to
the intended parents where certain safeguard criteria are met
Family Law Council Recommendations
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
23
o ACT
o offence for a person to knowingly provide any professional or technical
services to assist in achieving a pregnancy which is, or which will be,
the subject of a commercial substitute parent agreement or a surrogacy
contract.
o fine, imprisonment or both
o QLD:
• a person must not intentionally provide a professional, medical or
technical service to another person if the persons knows the other
person intends to be party to a commercial surrogacy arrangement and
the service is provided with the intention of helping the other person
become pregnant for the purposes of a commercial surrogacy
arrangement.
• fine or imprisonment.
Professional services
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
24
o VIC
o a registered ART provider may only carry out a treatment
procedure on a woman under a surrogacy arrangement if the
surrogacy arrangement has been approved by the Patient
Review Panel.
o In deciding whether to approve a surrogacy arrangement the
Patient Review Panel must be satisfied that:
• a doctor has formed the opinion that
• the commissioning parent is unlikely to become pregnant, be
able to carry a pregnancy, or give birth; or
• if the commissioning parent is a woman, she is likely to
place her life or health, or that of the baby, at risk if she
becomes pregnant, carries a pregnancy or gives birth;
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
25
WA
o offence for a person to provide a service knowing that the
service is to facilitate a surrogacy arrangement that is for reward.
o An exception is made for health services provided to the birth mother
after she becomes pregnant.
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
27
4 broad categories of approach:
Total prohibition of all surrogacy (eg France, Austria, Bangladesh,
Egypt)
Permit & regulate altruistic arrangements but prohibit commercial
surrogacy (eg Australia, Belgium, UK, Canada)
Permit commercial surrogacy (eg India, Israel, Russia, Ukraine,
Georgia);
Unregulated / lack of specific laws (eg Argentina, Japan, Mexico,
Czech Republic)
Majority of nations that regulate surrogacy prohibit commercial
surrogacy
Approaches
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
29
Right to reproductive autonomy
Right to found a family
Right to respect for human life
What is sold is not a child but a gestation service
Banning it in Australia sends couples offshore
Risk of exploitation is not as great as previously assumed
Australian government already gives tacit consent through the
apparent lack of interest in prosecuting those who enter such
agreements
Children have a right to now their genetic background
Overseas clinical practices may be less safe, desirable and
adequate
For
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
30
× Prohibition on the sale of children / trafficking
× Exploitation of the mother
× Concerns regarding consent
× Differing international approaches to legal status of resultant child
× Commodification of human life
× Human dignity violated
× Legal parentage problems
× Disparities in race, religion, culture, economic status, education
Against
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
31
“I think international commercial surrogacy is the new frontline in
human trafficking. We have enough anecdotal evidence to believe that
people are commissioning children willy-nilly without any proper
protections for the children or the surrogate mothers”
Judge John Pascoe
“Eurocentric portrayals of and speculations about surrogacy cannot
incorporate the reality in India, where commercial surrogacy has
become a survival strategy and a temporary occupation for some poor
rural women, where women are recruited systematically by fertility
clinics and matched with clients from India and abroad”
Amrita Pande, Centre for Social Research, New Delhi
Quotes
© S
late
r and G
ord
on L
imited 2
015
32
“How do you think we feel about being created specifically to be given
away . . . I don’t care why my parents or my mother did this. It looks to
me like I was bought and sold . . . When you exchange something for
[m]oney it is called a commodity. Babies are not commodities. Babies
are human beings. How do you think this makes us feel to know that
there was money exchanged for us? . . . Because somewhere between
the narcissistic, selfish or desperate need for a child and the desire to
make a buck, everyone else’s needs and wants are put before the
kids[‘] needs. We, the children of surrogacy, become lost. That is the
real tragedy.”
18yo boy born through surrogacy (Smerdon et al 2008)