January 9, 2014COE FACULTY 101

1. Teaching/student support (3:30-4:25)COE advising (15 min)Center for Teaching and Learning (30 min)Rubrics (10 min)

2. Course Development (4:25-4:40)3. Assessment and Accreditation COE

and OSU (4:40-5:00)***Break (5:00 to 5:30)***

4. Broader Impact Partners (5:30-5:50)***Socialize***

OUTLINE

Summer 2015, all first-year COE students advised centrally

What is advising?Professional verses Faculty advising

Exploration, academic success, career, PIN, curricular, procedural

MyDegrees

ADVISORS ARE YOUR FRIENDS

COE CENTRAL ADVISORS

COE Head Advisor

Brett Jeter

COE Central Advising Mary Sarah Kameron Michelle Chuinard Kyllo Kadooka White

International and academic success

advisingCaine Francis and

Nova Schauss  

SCHOOL ADVISORS

MIME AdvisingTyler Carrie John

NancyDeAdder Randall Barber

Holman

CBEE AdvisingKristen Richard

Rorrer Kerr

NERHP Advising

Joan Stueve

BEE AdvisingRoger Ely

SCHOOL ADVISORS

EECS AdvisingCalvin Shannon Lizabeth Padma NicholasHughes Reed Marquez Akkaraju Malos (Ecampus) (Ecampus)

CCE AdvisingJanice Katie

Nave-Avebele Whitehead

CTL Website (http://oregonstate.edu/ctl/)

Winter SymposiumTeaching Tools (Rubrics, etc.)

Video Introduction to cognition (https://media.oregonstate.edu/media//0_rwgtq59h)

Rubrics and more…. (https://media.oregonstate.edu/media//0_k6clrdif)

CENTER FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING

RUBRICS

Performance Indicators

1(unsatisfactory)

2(satisfactory)

3(good)

4(excellent)

Develop process flow diagrams

PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations),  missing or incorrect  standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)

PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)

PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriately

PFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing waste

Perform economic analyses  

Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analyses

Considers capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate

Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analyses

Comprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity

Optimize design given constraints

No recognition of constraints and no alternatives considered

Consideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives

Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability)

Consideration of multiple constraints

EXAMPLE RUBRIC TO ASSESS DESIGN

Performance Indicators

1(unsatisfactory)

2(satisfactory)

3(good)

4(excellent)

Develop process flow diagrams

PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations),  missing or incorrect  standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)

PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)

PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriately

PFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing waste

Perform economic analyses  

Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analyses

Considers capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate

Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analyses

Comprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity

Optimize design given constraints

No recognition of constraints and no alternatives considered

Consideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives

Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability)

Consideration of multiple constraints

EXAMPLE RUBRIC TO ASSESS DESIGN

Set of criteria that define and describe the important components of the work being evaluated

Performance Indicators

1(unsatisfactory)

2(satisfactory)

3(good)

4(excellent)

Develop process flow diagrams

PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations),  missing or incorrect  standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)

PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)

PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriately

PFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing waste

Perform economic analyses  

Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analyses

Considers capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate

Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analyses

Comprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity

Optimize design given constraints

No recognition of constraints and no alternatives considered

Consideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives

Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability)

Consideration of multiple constraints

EXAMPLE RUBRIC TO ASSESS DESIGN

Provides clear targets of proficiency to students

Enables unambiguous assessment of qualitative tasks

Promotes consistency between multiple evaluators

Creative ThinkingCritical ThinkingEthical ReasoningGlobal LearningInquiry and

AnalysisIntercultural

Knowledge and Competence

Foundation and Skills for Lifelong Learning

Oral CommunicationProblem SolvingQuantitative LiteracyTeamworkWritten

Communication

VALUE RUBRICS

Developed by the Association of American Colleges and Universities

PROBLEM SOLVING RUBRIC

So….you want to offer a new course.1. Review plans with School’s curriculum

committee2. Develop a syllabus with the required

content3. Options

Offer under a blanket course #

New course #4. Online Curriculum

Proposal System

COURSE DEVELOPMENT

Visit “Course Proposals” from right menu of APAA (http://drupaldev.cws.oregonstate.edu/apaa/academic-programs/home)

Checklist for proposalsCommon problemsSyllabus templateBlooms taxonomy

Select “Curriculum Proposal System” from top menu of APAA

OSU COURSE PROPOSAL

By Program (ABET)

6 year cycleSingle self-study

report due at year 6

by University (NWCCU)

7 year cycleReports every 2

years with different content

ACCREDITATION

Effect on you (typical faculty)?Course outcomes (on your syllabus) must map to

specific program outcomesMust complete course reflection after each courseDuring year 5 and 6 collect graded student work

Help with proposal project description and budget

Work with PI to develop integration Implement, administer and assess

broader impact project Deliver material for final reports

BROADER IMPACT PARTNERS WILL…