Draft version September 6, 2021Typeset using LATEX preprint2 style in AASTeX61

THE VARIABLE WAVELENGTH DEPENDENCE OF THE DIPPING EVENT OF KIC 8462852

Eva H. L. Bodman,1, ∗ Jason Wright,2, 3 Tabetha S. Boyajian,4 and Tyler G. Ellis4

1School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, USA2Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, State College, PA16802, USA

3Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA16802, USA

4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA

Submitted to AJ

ABSTRACT

First observed with the Kepler mission, KIC 8462852 undergoes unexplained dimming events,“dips,” on the timescale of days which were again observed from the ground from May to December2017. Monitored with multi-band photometry by the Los Cumbres Observatory, all four dips of the“Elsie dip family” display clear wavelength dependence. We measure how the wavelength dependencechanges over the whole dimming event, including the dimming between the dips and the brighteningevent (the ‘blip’) which occurs after the dips. We find that a single wavelength dependence does notfit the entire light curve and the dimming occurring between the dips is non-gray and varies in time.Because of the non-gray dimming between the dips, we measure the wavelength dependence of thedips separately and without the extra depth from this dimming. Such measurements yield a differentestimate of the wavelength dependence the wavelength dependence of the dips but remains consistentwith the previous measurement except for Elsie (the first dip), which is surrounded by dimming withstrong wavelength dependence. We find the range of the wavelength dependence variation of theentire 2017 light curve is consistent with optically-thin dust with an average radius of r < 1µm andthe dust causing just the dips being r < 0.5µm. Since the dependence is time-dependent, the dustocculting the star must be heterogeneous in size, composition, or both and the distributions of theseproperties along the line of sight must change over time.

Keywords: stars: individual (KIC 8462852) — stars: peculiar

Corresponding author: Eva Bodmanebodman1@asu.edu∗ NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow, Nexus for Exoplanet System Science

arX

iv:1

806.

0884

2v1

[as

tro-

ph.S

R]

22

Jun

2018

2 Bodman et al.

1. INTRODUCTION

An otherwise-typical F main sequence star,KIC 8462852 displayed a series of large de-creases in observed flux (“dips”), up to 20%during the Kepler mission (Borucki et al.2010), that were discovered through the PlanetHunters citizen science project (Boyajian et al.2016). The dips were asymmetric and the Ke-pler light curve showed little evidence of pe-riodicity in these events, although later ob-servations and analysis showed hints (e.g. Si-mon et al. 2018; Kiefer et al. 2017; Bourneet al. 2018). Archival and follow-up observa-tions showed no evidence of infrared (IR) ex-cess, putting strict limits on the amount of hotand warm dust in the system (Boyajian et al.2016; Marengo et al. 2015; Thompson et al.2016). From long cadence archival data fromthe Harvard plates, Schaefer (2016) found thatKIC 8462852 has dimmed ∼16% over the lastcentury, the so-called “secular” dimming andCastelaz & Barker (2018) confirmed a slightlysmaller secular dimming of ∼ 12% with thearchival plates from the Maria Mitchell Obser-vatory. (However, Hippke et al. (2017) disputesthe statistical significance of the Schaefer (2016)results and finds no significant dimming in theSonneberg plates). Recent data also displaysanomalous long-term and possibly periodic dim-ming behavior (Meng et al. 2017; Simon et al.2018) and (Montet & Simon 2016) analysis ofthe Kepler full frame images show that the stardimmed by 3% over the course of the mission.

To explain these large dips and sometimesthe long term dimming, a myriad of causeswere proposed and organized into general cat-egories by Wright & Sigurdsson (2016): cir-cumstellar material, intervening material, stel-lar origins and solar system material. Circum-stellar origins examined include large swarmsof exocomets (Bodman & Quillen 2016; Boya-jian et al. 2016), dust-enshrouded planetesimalson eccentric orbits (Neslusan & Budaj 2017),

and a planetary ring system on a 12-year circu-lar orbit with Trojans (Ballesteros et al. 2018).Foukal (2017a) studied the intrinsic variations.Katz (2017) examined the plausibility of rings inthe outer solar system. Few scenarios endeavorto plausibly explain both the long-term dim-ming and the short-term dips but Metzger et al.(2017) proposed the consumption of a secondaryto naturally explain both anomalous behaviors.In this model, the star’s luminosity would re-duce after consuming the secondary and tran-siting material left over would result in dips.For general circumstellar material, Wyatt et al.(2018) showed that an elliptical dust ring withenough material to cause the secular dimmingcan be consistent with the IR constraints un-der certain conditions and clumps within sucha ring can explain the dips with IR excess onlydetectable for about a week around the event.

During a monitoring campaign funded byKickstarter backers1, KIC 8462852 began dis-playing dips from May to Oct 2017 which trig-gered a larger follow-up observation effort (Boy-ajian et al. 2018). This series of dips, dubbedthe Elsie family, consists of four shallow dips of∼ 1−2% in r′ band named Elsie, Celeste, SkaraBrae, and Angkor. Two more dips, Caral-Supeand Evangeline, occurred in 2018 that weredeeper, up to ∼ 5%, but in this work we re-strict ourselves to the 2017 events. Boyajianet al. (2018) limited the chromatic analysis tothe first dip Elsie and found the wavelengthdependence of the transit is consistent with op-tically thin dust. Deeg et al. (2018) found aconsistent wavelength dependence with theirobservations. The dust size required for the ob-served color is < 1µm, which is smaller than theblow-out limit for an early F star, and thereforethe dust must be newly created, if it is circum-stellar. The wavelength dependence for the dips

1 https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/608159144/the-most-mysterious-star-in-the-galaxy

Dips of KIC 8462852 3

is also larger than that observed for the long-term dimming (Meng et al. 2017), suggestingthat these are two different dust populations.

Here, we perform a detailed analysis of thewavelength dependence of the Elsie family ofdips with the LCOGT data (see section 2), re-stricting ourselves to the 2017 events. We studyhow the wavelength dependence of the dimmingevent changes with time in section 3.1. Then weexamine each dip individually with the seculardimming removed in section 3.2 and discuss insection 3.3 how these measurements compare tothose including the secular dimming. With themeasured individual wavelength dependences ofthe dips, we estimate the grain size of the oc-culting dust assuming various compositions insection 4. Finally, we summarize our results.

2. OBSERVATIONS

We acquired photometric time-series obser-vations using the Las Cumbres Observatory(LCOGT) 0.4m robotic telescope network. Boy-ajian et al. (2018) presented a subset of the ob-servations described here, namely, data taken inB, r′, i′ filters from 2017 May (during Elsie) aswell as the time series in r′ from 2017 May toDecember when the object no longer was visi-ble. Here we provide a description of the fullLCOGT 2017 data set taken during the Elsiefamily of dips.

KIC 8462852 is visible from the northernhemisphere, and the corresponding LCOGTnetwork consists of telescopes at two sites op-erational during all of 2017: “TFN” (CanaryIslands) and “OGG” (Hawaii), and an addi-tional site which became operational in 2017November, “ELP” (Texas). At each pointing,we requested an observation sequence compris-ing a series of 2 to 4 exposures in each of the B,r′, i′ filters. Exposure times were 200, 40 and30 seconds for the B, r′, i′ filters, respectively,leading to a total of ∼ 20 minutes per observa-tion request including overheads for slew time,filter changes, readout, etc. We intentional de-

focused by 1 mm on the focal plane in orderto minimize the effects of detector systematicsin the photometry, however, we note that thedefocus command on the 0.4m network sites isnot robustly calibrated, leading to somewhatvariable point spread functions. Each obser-vation sequence was requested at a cadence ofevery 0.5 to 2 hours, where in reality the num-ber of completed observation requests per nightvaried depending on the availability of the 0.4mtelescope network schedule as well as down timedue to weather and technical issues.

Images are processed by LCOGT automati-cally with BANZAI2 and are then transferred tolocal machines where we extracted the photom-etry for each telescope and filter image stacksusing AstroimageJ (Collins et al. 2017). Dueto the variable defocus mentioned above, we al-lowed the aperture radius of 7 pixels to varyby a multiplication factor of 1.25. The back-ground annulus inner and outer radius was setto 15 and 25 pixels, respectively. We selectedan ensemble of between 4 and 9 stars in thefield of view as reference stars. We inspectedlight curves generated for the comparison starsalong with the science star to ensure stability ofthe comparison stars. We also assessed whetherpoor sky conditions affected data quality anddiscarded images where the flux measurementsfor all of the comparison stars deviated by morethan 3-sigma from their mean. We computednightly averages in each filter for each LCOGTstation by taking the weighted mean of the in-dividual measurements. We then determinedthe measurement errors by fitting a flat curveto a weeks worth of measurements taken dur-ing an inactive period. The combined nightlyerror was then scaled appropriately assuming areduced χ2 of unity.

We made configuration changes to our obser-vation request on 4 different dates which re-

2 https://github.com/LCOGT/banzai

4 Bodman et al.

0.96

0.97

0.98

0.99

1.00

1.01Fl

uxElsie Celeste Skara Brae Angkor 'blip'

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112 13 14 1516 17

Br'i'

OGGTFNELP

80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300J.D.-2457800

1

2

3

4

5

6

Dept

h Ra

tio

B/i'r'/i'

Figure 1. The top plot is the light curve of the Elsie dip family with the fit described in detail in section3.1. The three filters B, r′, and i′ are in purple, blue, and red, respectively. Each LCOGT site is markedwith a different shape. The dotted vertical lines mark the bins for the depth ratios (B/i′ and r′/i′) andthe solid, dark gray vertical lines mark the known discontinuities in the normalizations due to changes ininstrumental setup. The Elsie, Celeste, Skara Brae, and Angkor dips are highlighted in red, yellow, green,and blue, respectively. The label “blip” marks the approximate peak of the long term brightening trendoccurring post-Angkor. The numbered regions refer to values listed in table 1. The bottom plot shows thedepth ratios of each region over time with B/i′ in purple and r′/i′ in blue. Our measured depth ratios areinsensitive to reasonable choices for the normalizations across the known discontinuities, and the fact thatthere is little or no evidence for discontinuities in the depth ratios across these boundaries demonstrates thatour choices for normalizations are correct. A single depth ratio cannot fit the entire light curve well.

sulted in small relative flux offsets for the com-parison stars and the science target. Thesechanges occurred on JD 24557932, 24557960,2457970, 24558044, and marked by gray verticallines in Fig. 1. As discussed in section 3.1, thesmall offsets do not have large impact on ourresults.

3. WAVELENGTH DEPENDENCE OFLIGHT CURVE

We examine how the wavelength dependencechanges over the course of the Elsie dip familyevent from May 2017 to December 2017, whichincludes the ∼ 0.5 % brightening “blip” thatoccurred afterward the last dip, starting fromday ∼230 and lasting at least through day 270.

However, there is dimming occurring on differ-ent timescales that needs to be taken into ac-count: the dips of up to ∼ 3% lasting 1-2 weeksand small, slow < 1% variation over the en-tire 7 months of data. As labeled in fig. 1, thedips in order are Elsie, Celeste, Skara Brae, andAngkor. Between the named dips, the flux doesnot return to pre-Elsie levels, indicating a prob-able secular dimming occurring with the dips.In particular, between Celeste and Skara Brae,the flux in the i′ band did not return to pre-Elsie level but remains steadily at∼ 0.5% belowthose levels. After the last 2017 dip, Angkor,a small brightening above pre-Elsie levels oc-curs for a few weeks reaching ∼ 1% in B bandnear day 250 (at the point marked “blip” in

Dips of KIC 8462852 5

fig. 1). However, this long dimming and theblip are only marginal detections (2-3σ) so thislong term trend may not be real.

If there is significant slower secular dimmingoccurring simultaneously to the dips with a dif-ferent wavelength dependence, then the mea-sured wavelength dependence of the combineddimming would be a mixture of the wavelengthdependences of the dip and the secular dim-ming. For example, including gray secular dim-ming will make measurements of the total wave-length dependence of a dip compared to baselinelevels appear weaker than it really is, whereassecular dimming with strong wavelength depen-dence would make the dips’ dependences appearstronger. This makes the choice of how to nor-malize important as it changes the amount ofsecular dimming included. To minimize theseeffects, we also examine each dip individuallynormalized in such a way that any secular dim-ming is removed.

3.1. Wavelength dependence over time

3.1.1. Light Curve Model

We perform a least squares fit to the entire2017 light curve with a similar fitting algorithmto the one used to fit the Elsie dip in Boyajianet al. (2018) with the only difference being thatwe allow segments of the light curve to have dif-ferent wavelength dependence so we can studyhow the dependence changes with time. De-scribed in detail below, the free parameters wefit together are the depth in the i′ band for eachday there is data (dn), the depth ratios betweenthe filter, X, over a given region (X/i′), and thenormalization of the entire light curve for eachcamera in each filter (NX).

We define a depth in the i′ band for day n asdn = ∆Fi′ = Ni′ − Fi′ and require the depthsto be positive. The requirement dn > 0 definesNi′ to be the highest flux value which occursnear the top of the ‘blip’ around day 255. Thedepth ratio is then defined as X/i′ ≡ ∆FX/∆Fi′

where ∆FX = NX − FX and NX and FX arethe normalization and flux in either the B or r′

band. We include flat normalizations for eachtelescope camera in each filter as free parame-ters to take into account the small instrumen-tal differences without removing any long-termtrends. As done with the wavelength depen-dence fit with Elsie in Boyajian et al. (2018),each day has a depth in the i′ filter (dn) that isfit to the data in all the filters with appropriatecolor and normalization scaling such that NX ,dn and X/i′ are fit simultaneously. The residualwe minimize is

χ2 =∑FX

(FX −NX × [1− dn ×X/i′])2

(σFX)2

(1)

where σFXis the reported uncertainty on the

photometry and X/i′ = 1 with i′ data. Thenormalizations, NX , are held constant in timewhile dn and X/i′ are allowed to vary in timewith different binning. The renormalized dataare shown with the light curve fit in the top plotof fig. 1.

To examine how the wavelength dependenceof the dimming changes over time, we defineregions of constant B/i′ and r′/i′ which rangefrom ∼ 5 − 10 days long. Boundaries areplaced at the beginning, middle, and end of eachdip and at approximately equal spaces betweendips, as well as at the beginning and end ofthe light curve. These boundaries for separatedepth ratio regions are indicated by light gray,vertical dotted lines in Fig 1 with the Elsie, Ce-leste, Skara Brae, and Angkor dips highlightedin red, yellow, green and blue. The measuredB/i′ and r′/i′ are displayed in the bottom plotof fig. 1. The depth ratios for the dips (the col-ored regions) are listed in table 1 as total depthratio, (X/i′)tot, and the depth ratios for the sec-ular dimming (the uncolored regions) in the re-gions adjacent to dips are listed as secular depthratio, (X/i′)sec. These regions are labeled 1-17in Fig.1 and their depth ratio values labeled in

6 Bodman et al.

table 1. These labels are explained in section3.2.

There are small discontinuities in the normal-izations as seen by eye in the comparison starsdue to instrumental effects. To check the ef-fect of the normalization discontinuities on de-termining the wavelength dependence, we placeadditional boundaries in B/i′ and r′/i′ at theknown discontinuities. These boundaries aremarked by solid, dark gray vertical lines in fig.1. One of these normalization discontinuitiesoccurs during Skara Brae, so this dip has threecolor regions instead of two like the others. Forall but one, there is no significant change indepth ratio across the discontinuities, demon-strating our choice in normalization is correct.

3.1.2. Results

The measured depth ratios, X/i′, vary from1 to 6 with the most noticeable changes occur-ring at some of the boundaries of the dips. Thejump in depth ratio from going in to out of dipis particularly large around Elsie where B/i′ isnearly twice as large in the regions adjacent tothe dip than in the dip. However, when dn isvery small, the errors become larger so the dif-ferences between in-dip Elsie and the regionsright before and after it are < 1σ and 1.5σ re-spectively. Restricting ourselves to regions withsmall errors (. 0.2), B/i′ varies from ∼ 3− 1.5while r′/i′ remains between ∼ 2− 1.2.

The variation in depth ratios is less when com-paring only the dip regions, (the colored regionsin Fig. 1). The first two dips, Elsie and Ce-leste have B/i′ ≈ 3 but for Skara Brae andAngkor B/i′ ≈ 2. The variation is less forr′/i′ with Elsie and Celeste with r′/i′ ≈ 1.8and Skara Brae and Angkor with r′/i′ ≈ 1.6.The largest B/i′ region at 3.01±0.26 occurs dur-ing Elsie which is inconsistent with the previ-ously reported value 1.94±0.06 (Boyajian et al.2018) at the 4σ level. The other Elsie B/i′ re-gion is also inconsistent with the previous mea-surement at B/i′ = 2.80 ± 0.24. For r′/i′, the

values measure here, 1.77±0.15 and 1.83±0.16are larger than the previously reported value,1.31±0.04 (Boyajian et al. 2018) but with onlya 3σ discrepancy. This discrepancy is causedby the strong, secular dimming wavelength de-pendence contributing to our measured depthratio by our choice in normalization. When thesecular and dip components are separated, thediscrepancy reduces. This is discussed furtherin section 3.3.

For the secular dimming (the uncolored re-gions of Fig. 1), the (B/i′)sec and (r′/i′)sec ratioalso changes with time. At the beginning ofthe light curve, B/i′ ≈5 and r′/i′ ≈2.75 andthen both decrease to ∼1.5. After day 220, thedepth ratios become unreliable because of thesmall depths since the ratios are undefined whendn = 0.

3.2. Color of the Dips

To remove the effects of the secular wave-length dependence, we look at segments of theof the light curve just a few days wider than eachindividual dip. We denote the depth ratios mea-sured for the colored regions in section 3.1 asthe “total depth ratios” (X/i′)tot because we didnot remove any long-term color trends from thedip depths. The depth ratios measured in thissection are denoted “dip depth ratios” (X/i′)dipsince the secular dimming is removed. The rela-tionship between these two ratios, (X/i′)tot and(X/i′)dip is discussed in more detail in section3.3.

We perform the fitting method to the dip lightcurve segments but artificially set the normal-ization of the light curve to the level just priorto or just after the dip (or both in the caseof Celeste) depending whichever level is higher,by setting dn = 0 for 5 − 6 days in the pre-or post-dip region. The least squares fit thatresulted in an adequate solution, but the nor-malizations had a tendency to increase with de-creasing wavelength, which reduces the flux val-ues in B and r′ bands such that the flux is

Dips of KIC 8462852 7

Table 1. Elsie Dip Family Depth Ratios

Elsie Celeste Skara Brae Angkor

total depth ratio

(B/i′)tot 2.80± 0.24 (2) 2.92±0.32 (6) 1.95±0.34 (10) 1.70±0.14 (15)

3.01± 0.26 (3) 2.24±0.19 (7) 2.00±0.22 (11) 1.66±0.19 (16)

2.05±0.20 (12)

(r′/i′)tot 1.77±0.15 (2) 1.79±0.20 (6) 1.79±0.30 (10) 1.45±0.12 (15)

1.83±0.16 (3) 1.84±0.16 (7) 1.63±0.18 (11) 1.60±0.18 (16)

1.65±0.16 (12)

dip depth ratio

(B/i′)dip 1.665+0.090−0.090 3.090+0.176

−0.171 2.309+0.117−0.135 1.803+0.112

−0.110

(r′/i′)dip 1.292+0.064−0.070 1.554+0.109

−0.105 1.157+0.077−0.077 1.131+0.081

−0.080

secular depth ratio

(B/i′)sec 4.92±2.47 (1) 4.76±1.04 (5) 1.92±0.30 (9) 1.29±0.20 (14)

5.15±1.23 (4) 1.63±0.27 (8) 2.43±0.97 (13) 1.27±0.42 (17)

(r′/i′)sec 2.94±1.46 (1) 2.84±0.61 (5) 1.71±2.59 (9) 1.75±0.23 (14)

2.81±0.66 (4) 1.75±0.28 (8) 3.78±1.52 (13) 2.41±0.71 (17)

Note—The top values are the total depth ratio fits for each of the two in-dipregions (3 for Skara Brae) that include the slow, secular dimming, (X/i′)tot,as described in section 3.1 and shown in Fig. 1. The middle values are thedip depth ratio fits of only the dips, (X/i′)dip, see section 3.2 and Fig. 2.The bottom values are the secular depth ratios, (X/i′)sec, see section 3.1. Thenumber in the parenthesis refer to regions marked in Fig. 1.

no longer normalized to one just outside thedip. The lower fluxes artificially increase thedepth ratios. To overcome that degeneracy inthe fit, we explored the parameter space withthe Markov chain Monte Carlo method with theemcee code (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2013). Weuse flat priors over ranges 0.5-5, 0.99-1.01, and>0 for the depth ratios, normalizations, and dn,respectively, and set equation 1 as the likelihoodwith the results of the least squares fit as theinitialization for the MCMC sampler. The re-sults of the Bayesian fit and the posteriors ofthe depth ratios, (X/i′)dip are shown in fig. 2with the averages and 1σ confidence levels listedin Table 1.

After removing the background wavelengthdependence, (X/i′)dip except for those of Elsieremain fairly consistent with (X/i′)tot from thewhole light curve fit as shown in fig. 3. ForCeleste, Skara Brae, and Angkor B/i′ are eachconsistent within . σ but r′/i′ is lower for eachdip by . 2σ. However, the depth ratios forElsie, (B/i′)dip = 1.67 and (r′/i′)dip = 1.29are significantly smaller than the total depthratio values, (B/i′)tot ≈ 3 and (r′/i′)tot ≈ 1.8with 5 and 3σ discrepancies, respectively. Theeffects of including the secular dimming arestronger when the difference in wavelength de-pendence is larger and Elsie has the largestjump in depth ratio going from in- to out-of-dip. The Elsie depth ratios from this renormal-

8 Bodman et al.

82 87 92 97 102JD-2457800

0.98

0.99

1.00

Norm

aliza

ed F

lux

Elsie

111 116 121 126 131JD-2457800

0.98

0.99

1.00

1.01Celeste

165170175180185JD-2457800

0.98

0.99

1.00

Skara Brae

200 205 210 215JD-2457800

0.98

1.00

Angkor

Br'i'OGGTFN

1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9B/i ′

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

Frac

tion

of S

ampl

es

2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3B/i ′

1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7B/i ′

1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2B/i ′

0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5r′/i ′

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

Frac

tion

of S

ampl

es

1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8r′/i ′

0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4r′/i ′

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3r′/i ′

Figure 2. The top panels are fits of the normalized dip segments of the light curve normalized with thesecular dimming removed as described in section 3.2. These panels are plotted with the same colors andmarkers as the top plot of fig. 1. Below are histograms of the posterior samples for (B/i′)dip and (r′/i′)dipfrom the Bayesian analysis with the average (solid vertical line) and 1σ errors (dotted vertical lines).

ized fit are slightly smaller than the previouslyreported value from Boyajian et al. (2018) butthe discrepancy is only 2σ for B/i′ and < 1σ forr′/i′. This small discrepancy is due to a differ-ent choice in the number of out-of-dip days wereused to normalize the light curve. For Celeste,the second (B/i′)tot region (days ∼ 120−130) isinconsistent with the (B/i′)dip value and ∼ 4σlower. This low B/i′ region is a shallower partof the dip where wavelength dependence is dom-inated by the lower secular depth ratio value.

The fits have a small tendency to favor largerdepth ratios, which is reflected in the slightasymmetry in the depth ratio posteriors in fig.2. The normalization of a filter is also fairly cor-

related with depth ratio for that filter as shownin the top two 2-D histograms in the corner plotsfor Elsie displayed in figs. 4 and 5. This causessome of the normalizations to have the sameasymmetry. Despite dn being compared to datain all filters, dn is strongly correlated to X/i′ inthe same direction for both B and r′ band. Thispattern is true for the other dips except for Bband with Celeste. Celeste is much shallowerthan the rest after renormalization so the errorsare larger.

3.3. Blending Wavelength Dependences

Assuming the secular dimming and the dipsare from two separate, optically-thin dust popu-lations, then the total extinction τtot is the sum

Dips of KIC 8462852 9

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5(X/i ′)dip

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5(X

/i′) to

t

B/i ′r′/i ′

ElsieCelesteSkara BraeAngkor

Figure 3. Plot comparing of the total depth ra-tio (dip plus any long term color trends), (X/i′)tot,measured in section 3.1 versus just the dip depthratio, (X/i′)dip, as measured in section 3.2. Thedotted line marks (X/i′)tot = (X/i′)dip. For Ce-leste, Skara Brae, and Angkor, the depth ratios areconsistent to within ∼ 2σ. The measurements forElsie are inconsistent at the 3σ level for r′/i′ and5σ for B/i′ (see section 3.2 for details).

of the opacities of each dust population, i.e.,τtot = τsec + τdip. Since the extinction is ap-proximately the dip depth in the optically thinregime (dn ≈ τi′), the depth ratio during a dipwith background dimming is(

X

i′

)tot

=τX, sec + τX, dipτi′, sec + τi′, dip

=(X/i′)sec

1 +τi′, dipτi′, sec

+(X/i′)dip

1 +τi′, secτi′, dip

(2)

where X is the B or r′ filter. The measureddepth ratio depends on three factors: the depthratio of the secular dimming material, the depthratio of the dip material and the ratio of extinc-tion from the dip to the secular material. Forthe secular material to have an impact on themeasured depth ratio ((X/i′)tot), two criteria

must be met: the depth ratios of the secular ma-terial and and the dip material must be signifi-cantly different (|(X/i′)sec− (X/i′)dip| � 0) andthe extinction due to secular dimming must becomparable to the dip extinction (τi′, dip/τi′, sec ∼1).

In figure 6, we show lines of constant (X/i′)dipassuming τi′dip./τi′sec = 2.0 on a plot of (X/i′)totversus (X/i′)sec. The line of equal depth ratios,(X/i′)tot = (X/i′)sec = (X/i′)dip is marked bythe dotted line. The slopes of constant (X/i′)dipdecrease (increase) with increasing (decreasing)τi′dip/τi′sec and pivot at the point of equal depthratios. On the right side of the plot, the seculardimming has a stronger influence on the wave-length dependence and the dips will appear tohave a larger depth ratio than they actually do.

We overlaid the average values for (X/i′)totand (X/i′)sec found in section 3.1 (see also table1) on fig. 6. For the average (X/i′)sec, we usedthe immediately adjacent regions on each sideof the dip. Since the data points are within acouple σ of the line of equal depth ratios, theeffect of changing the extinction ratio is smallcompared to the errors. Even though Elsie hasa much larger observed (B/i′)tot than Angkor,both are consistent with (B/i′)dip = 2 whichbrings (B/i′)tot of Elsie in agreement with pre-vious measurements. If we changed the refer-ence for normalizing the light curve, (X/i′)totand (X/i′)sec would change but (X/i′)dip shouldremain the same.

At (B/i′)dip = 3.09 and r′/i′ ≈ 1.55, Ce-leste is much redder than Elsie, Skara Brae andAngkor where (B/i′)dip = 1.67, 2.31 and 1.80and (r′/i′)dip = 1.29, 1.16a and 1.13, respec-tively. In fig. 6, the r′/i′ points for all thedips fall in the expected 1-1.5 range for dipdepth ratio andB/i′ points for Elsie, Skara Braeand Angkor fall in the expected 1.5-2.0 rangeas well. However, the (B/i′)dip value for Ce-leste is much higher than expected than whatwould be expected from this plot. This is be-

10 Bodman et al.

0.995

20.995

80.996

40.997

0

NB,

OG

G

0.996

40.997

00.997

60.998

2

NB,

TFN

1.50

1.65

1.80

1.95

B/i ′0.0

120.0

130.0

140.0

150.0

16

d n

0.995

20.9

9580.9

9640.9

970

NB, OGG0.9

9640.9

9700.9

9760.9

982

NB, TFN0.0

120.0

130.0

140.0

150.0

16

dn

Figure 4. Corner plot of the Elsie fit with the normalization in B band and B/i′ color and dn for thedeepest day of the dip. The 2-D histograms show correlations between dn and B/i′, both NB, and B/i′,and between the two NB.

cause one (B/i′)tot region is much lower thanthe other which brings down the average. Ifonly the higher B/i′ region is used, then thepoint would be near the 3.0 dip ratio line andconsistent with measured values. This confirmsthe assumption that the dips and the seculardimming are caused by two optically thin dustpopulations which can be treated separately isgood.

4. GRAIN PROPERTIES

Assuming that the dips are caused by transit-ing clouds of optically-thin dust, we can looselyconstrain the grain size and composition of thedust from the wavelength dependence of thedips. We compare our measured depth ra-tios with the secular dimming effects removed(X/i′)dip from section 3.2 to theoretically calcu-lated dust opacities for optically-thin distribu-tions in fig. 7. The opacities were taken fromtables from Budaj et al. (2015) which assumehomogeneous spherical dust grains with a Dier-

Dips of KIC 8462852 11

0.000

80.0

004

0.000

00.0

004

0.000

8

Nr′ ,

OG

G

+1

1.001

01.0

015

1.002

01.0

025

Nr′ ,

TFN

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

r′/i ′0.0

120.0

130.0

140.0

150.0

16

d n

0.000

80.0

0040.0

000

0.000

40.0

008

Nr′, OGG +11.0

010

1.001

51.0

020

1.002

5

Nr′, TFN0.0

120.0

130.0

140.0

150.0

16

dn

Figure 5. Same corner plot of the Elsie dip as in fig. 4 but for the normalization in r′ band and r′/i′ color.Same correlated errors occur in the r′ band as the B band.

mendjian size distribution (Deirmendjian 1964).Fig. 7 is similar to figure 8 in Boyajian et al.(2018) except that we explore fewer composi-tions, only five refractory dust species and waterice. For silicate compositions which can containvarying amounts iron, we consider one pyroxenemineral (Mg1−xFexSio3) with a 60/40 Fe/Mg ra-tio and one olivine mineral (Mg2−yFe2−2ySio4)with a 50/50 Fe/Mg ratio. Optical proper-ties of these minerals are sensitive to iron con-tent but this has little impact on our analysisof the depth ratios here since there is a com-

position and grain size degeneracy. We alsoconsider other refractory compositions: carbon,iron, and corundum.

For pyroxene, olivine, and corundum, we findthese minerals fit B/i′ and r′/i′ of all the dipswith an average grain size of 0.1-0.3 µm. Car-bon and iron fit with slightly smaller grain sizes,. 0.1µm, and are ∼ 1/2 as large for Celestethan Elsie and Angkor. Water ice requires alarger grain size of 0.2-0.4 µm with the grainsfor Celeste on the small side of the range andElsie on the large.

12 Bodman et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6(X/i ′)sec

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0(X

/i′) to

t

1.0

2.0

3.0B/i ′r′/i ′

ElsieCelesteSkara BraeAngkor

Figure 6. Plot of the total depth ratio versus thesecular depth ratio with solid black lines of con-stant dip depth ratio as calculated by equation 2and described in section 3.3. We set the dip to sec-ular extinction ratio in i′, τi′,dip/τi′, sec = 2. Thedotted line marks (X/i′)tot = (X/i′)sec = (X/i′)dip.If the dip-to-background-depth ratio increases (de-creases), then the slope decreases (increases). Forvalues of (X/i′)sec on the right side of the dottedline, the measured depth ratio with will be strongerthan if the secular dimming is removed. The av-erage observed depth ratio for each dip listed intable 1 with the average of the immediately adja-cent background depth ratio regions are plotted inpurple for B/i′ and cyan for r′/i′. The dips aremarked by different shapes. Dip depth ratios of(X/i′)dip ∼ 2 and ∼ 1.5 are favored for B/i′ andr′/i′, respectively which confirms our assumptionthe secular dimming and the dips are caused bymultiple optically-thin dust populations that over-lap along the line of sight and can be treated sepa-rately.

From day 81 to 244, the secular dimmingwavelength dependence ranges over B/i′ ≈5.5 − 1 and r′/i′ ≈ 3 − 1.2. The r/i′ rangegoes higher than the theoretical depth ratiocurves. However, the regions that are above the

curves have large enough errors to be consistentwith at least the ice and pyroxene curves. Thehighest secular B/i′ is only ∼ 1.5σ, inconsistentwith the iron and carbon curves. The theoreti-cal curves for olivine, pyroxene, and ice all reachover B/i′ = 5.5. With the large uncertaintiesof the secular depth ratios, no dust composi-tion can be excluded. The lowest value for r′/i′

constrains the grain size to < 0.5µm, with icerequiring the largest grains. However, > 1µmgrains are not excluded at the 2σ level. B/i′

does not provide an upper limit as the lowestvalue is consistent with gray extinction fromlarge grains.

5. DISCUSSION

The variable wavelength dependence observedin the light curve suggests that the dusty ma-terial occulting KIC 8462852 is heterogeneousin size, composition, or both, but small changesin these properties can result in large changesin wavelength dependence. The opacity of adust grain is very sensitive to the grain size inthe sub-micron range for visible light. Despite(B/i′)dip being much larger for Celeste the grainsize is only a factor of . 2 smaller than the otherthree dips. The depth ratios can be even moresensitive to the composition. For example, a0.2 µm-size grain is consistent with Celeste ifice, consistent with Elsie and Angkor if silicate,or gray if iron. The dust is highly unlikely to behomogeneous in composition, so small changesin relative proportions could explain the vari-ation in wavelength dependence as well as sizefluctuations.

For circumstellar dust, grains will be blownout of the system when the radiation pressureis comparable to the gravitational force, e.g.β = 0.5 (Burns et al. 1979). In the KIC 8462852system, this occurs for grain sizes of r . 1µm(see Figure 2 in Neslusan & Budaj 2017). Forthe wavelength dependence measured for eachof the dips, we constrain the dust grain sizeto r < 0.5µm so the dust would need to be

Dips of KIC 8462852 13

10 2 10 1 100 101

rmod (microns)

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0de

pth

ratio

B/i'

carbonironpyroxeneolivinecorundumice

10 2 10 1 100 101

rmod (microns)

0.75

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50r'/i'

Figure 7. Depth ratios for a given average grain size estimated for six different dust grain compositions.The observed dip depth ratios, (X/i′)tot, for each dip as described in section 3.2 are shown by red, yellow,green, and blue horizontal lines for Elsie, Celeste, Skara Brae, and Angkor (the same color scheme as infigure 1). Despite the large difference in depth ratios, all of the dips have a similar dust grain size range,< 0.5µm.

newly created. The variations in wavelength de-pendence and small grain size can be naturallyexplained if dust is brought in with larger ob-jects on elliptical orbits. Both exocomets (Bod-man & Quillen 2016) and dust enshrouded plan-etesimals (Neslusan & Budaj 2017) would formclouds of newly-produced, small-grain dust andvariations in composition of the parent bodieswould produce a heterogeneous dust cloud withvarying properties.

The slow secular dimming appears to havea non-gray color dependence for much of theElsie dip family which is in contrast to the graydimming (RV > 5) measured by Meng et al.(2017). However, due to the larger uncertaintieson the measurements of the depth ratios for thesecular dimming regions, nearly-gray dimmingfrom large grains is only excluded at the . 3σlevel. The uncertainty of the depth ratios alsodo not include the uncertainty from the choicein normalization and the choice in normaliza-tion likely accounts for some of the discrepancy.If the chosen normalization removes most of the

gray secular dimming, then the wavelength de-pendency will be artificially large.

However if the long-term wavelength depen-dency is real, then models for the secular dim-ming that invoke the large-grain, circumstellardust such as the one proposed by Wyatt et al.(2018) cannot explain all of the long-term dim-ming occurring with the Elsie dip family. Wyattet al. (2018) proposed a ring of dust to modelthe observed century-long secular dimming andthe dimming observed during the Kepler mis-sion to test the IR excess constraints. Thismodel assumed old dust bound to the systemwith a grain size > 2µm which is much largerthan our grain size estimates of r . 0.5. Thegrains we observe causing the secular dimmingare too small to remain in the system for manyorbits and must be newly created. While theirmodel ignores small grain dust, it is not in con-flict some new dust production and not all ofthe dust producing the secular dimming maybe sub-micron. The wavelength dependence ofthe secular dimming appears to decrease overthe extent of the Elsie dip family and even-

14 Bodman et al.

tually becomes consistent with gray dimmingcaused by large grains. As such, the seculardimming may be only partially caused by new,small-grain dust.

6. CONCLUSIONS

The 2017 light curve of KIC 8462852 consist-ing of the Elsie dip family has a variable wave-length dependence that changes from dip todip, suggesting variation in the properties of thedust. There also appears to be a slowly varyingwavelength dependence from the secular dim-ming over the several months in which that dipfamily occurs. The secular dimming begins witha strong wavelength dependence near Elsie, be-coming more gray with time, but the small dipdepths cause the depth ratio measurement tohave large uncertainties making the non-graydimming detection only marginal.

Since the dips and secular dimming occurtogether, the reference point for normalizingthe light curve is important when measuringthe wavelength dependence of the dips. Theinclusion of long-term dimming with a differ-ent wavelength dependence changes the dipdepth ratios, but because the secular dimmingis smaller, most of the in-dip measurementswith and without secular dimming are con-sistent to 2σ. However, small differences inwavelength dependence can produce large un-certainties in dust grain properties. The largestdiscrepancy between the two methods is forElsie, where the strongest secular dimmingwavelength dependence occurs. The depth ratioincluding secular dimming for Elsieis B/i′ ≈ 3and r′/i′ ≈ 1.8 but after removing the secu-lar dimming, the depth ratios reduce toB/i′ =1.665 and r′/i′ = 1.292, which are more con-sistent with previously reported measurementsfrom Boyajian et al. (2018).

Although the wavelength dependence is vari-able, almost all the depth ratio measurementsare all consistent with sub-micron dust, whichagrees with Deeg et al. (2018). The only excep-

tion is the post-Angkor secular dimming whichis consistent with gray dimming (and hencelarger grain size) but the uncertainties are large.For the compositions studied here, the grain sizeis r < 0.5µm, with the largest grains being ofwater ice and the smallest being carbon withr < 0.1µm. Some of the secular dimming depthratios are higher (B/i′ > 4 and r/i′ > 2) thancalculated for iron and carbon dust models butthese compositions cannot be excluded due tolarge uncertainties in the measurements fromthe fit measurement and from the uncertaintyin the amount of secular dimming. Assumingcircumstellar material is causing the dips, bothpopulations of the dust measured in this papermust be newly created, as grains size r . 1µmwill be blown out of the system by an early Fstar. Ongoing multiband photometric monitor-ing is needed to better constrain the propertiesof the dust and the mechanism producing thedust.

Our wavelength dependence measurements donot exclude extinction from the ISM nor otherintervening dusty material that is not in the sys-tem. More observations such as searches for in-frared excess and periodicity are needed to con-firm that the dusty material is indeed circum-stellar. Intrinsic stellar variations from cooling∼30 K are consistent with the weaker wave-length dependence of Elsie and Angkor (Foukal2017b). More work is needed to test if the wave-length dependence of the rest of the light curveis consistent.

EHLB’s research was supported by an ap-pointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Programwithin the Nexus for Exoplanet System Science,administered by Universities Space ResearchAssociation under contract with NASA. TheCenter for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds issupported by the Pennsylvania State University,the Eberly College of Science, and the Penn-sylvania Space Grant Consortium. This work

Dips of KIC 8462852 15

makes use of observations from the LCOGT net-work. The LCOGT observations used in thisproject were made possible by the collective ef-fort of 1,762 supporters as part of the Kick-starter campaign The Most Mysterious Star inthe Galaxy 3. The authors gratefully acknowl-edge and humbly extend a special thanks for

substantial support from Las Cumbres Observa-tory, Glenn Klakring, Fred Boyajian & BobbieStaley, Alex Mazingue, The Bible Family, Clau-dio Bottaccini, Joachim De Lombaert, Amity& BrigidWilliams, Kevin Fischer, William Hop-kins, Milton Bosch, Zipeng Wang, TJ, DR, andCC.

REFERENCES

Ballesteros, F. J., Arnalte-Mur, P.,Fernandez-Soto, A., & Martınez, V. J. 2018,MNRAS, 473, L21

Bodman, E. H. L., & Quillen, A. 2016, ApJL, 819,L34

Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010,Science, 327, 977

Bourne, R., Gary, B. L., & Plakhov, A. 2018,MNRAS, 475, 5378

Boyajian, T. S., LaCourse, D. M., Rappaport,S. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3988

Boyajian, T. S., Alonso, R., Ammerman, A., et al.2018, ApJ, 853, L8

Budaj, J., Kocifaj, M., Salmeron, R., & Hubeny,I. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2

Burns, J. A., Lamy, P. L., & Soter, S. 1979,Icarus, 40, 1

Castelaz, M., & Barker, T. 2018, ArXiv e-prints,arXiv:1803.01943

Collins, K. A., Kielkopf, J. F., Stassun, K. G., &Hessman, F. V. 2017, AJ, 153, 77

Deeg, H. J., Alonso, R., Nespral, D., & Boyajian,T. S. 2018, A&A, 610, L12

Deirmendjian, D. 1964, ApOpt, 3, 187Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., &

Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306

Foukal, P. 2017a, ApJL, 842, L3—. 2017b, Research Notes of the American

Astronomical Society, 1, 52Hippke, M., Kroll, P., Matthai, F., et al. 2017,

ApJ, 837, 85Katz, J. I. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3680

Marengo, M., Hulsebus, A., & Willis, S. 2015,ApJL, 814, L15

Meng, H. Y. A., Rieke, G., Dubois, F., et al. 2017,ApJ, 847, 131

Metzger, B. D., Shen, K. J., & Stone, N. 2017,MNRAS, 468, 4399

Montet, B. T., & Simon, J. D. 2016, ApJL, 830,L39

Neslusan, L., & Budaj, J. 2017, A&A, 600, A86Schaefer, B. E. 2016, ApJL, 822, L34Simon, J. D., Shappee, B. J., Pojmanski, G., et al.

2018, ApJ, 853, 77Thompson, M. A., Scicluna, P., Kemper, F., et al.

2016, MNRAS, 458, L39Wright, J. T., & Sigurdsson, S. 2016, ApJL, 829,

L3Wyatt, M. C., van Lieshout, R., Kennedy, G. M.,

& Boyajian, T. S. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 5286

Kiefer, F., Lecavelier des Etangs, A.,Vidal-Madjar, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A132

3 https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/608159144/

the-most-mysterious-star-in-the-galaxy/

16 Bodman et al.

0.998

40.9

988

0.999

20.9

996

NB,

OG

G

0.997

60.998

20.998

80.999

4

NB,

TFN

2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0

B/i ′

0.005

40.006

00.006

60.007

20.007

8

d n

0.998

40.9

988

0.999

20.9

996

NB, OGG0.9

9760.9

9820.9

9880.9

994

NB, TFN0.0

0540.0

0600.0

0660.0

0720.0

078

dn

Figure 8. Corner plot for the Celeste dip for the normalization in B band and B/i′ color and the depthfor the deepest day.

APPENDIX

A. CORNER PLOTS

We show the corner plots for the fits of Celeste, Skara Brae and Angkor as described in section 3.2.As seen in fig. 4 and 5, dn and X/i′ are correlated and NX and X/i′ are correlated.

Dips of KIC 8462852 17

0.997

30.997

60.997

90.998

2

Nr′ ,

OG

G

0.996

50.997

00.997

50.998

0

Nr′ ,

TFN

1.4 1.6 1.8

r′/i ′

0.005

40.006

00.006

60.007

20.007

8

d n

0.997

30.9

976

0.997

90.9

982

Nr′, OGG0.9

965

0.997

00.9

975

0.998

0

Nr′, TFN0.0

0540.0

0600.0

0660.0

0720.0

078

dn

Figure 9. Corner plot for the Celeste dip for the normalization in r′ band and r′/i′ color and the depth forthe deepest day.

18 Bodman et al.

1.003

61.004

21.004

81.005

41.006

0

NB,

OG

G

1.006

61.007

21.007

81.008

41.009

0

NB,

TFN

1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6

B/i ′0.0

0720.0

0800.0

0880.0

0960.0

104

d n

1.003

61.0

0421.0

0481.0

0541.0

060

NB, OGG1.0

0661.0

0721.0

0781.0

0841.0

090

NB, TFN0.0

0720.0

0800.0

0880.0

0960.0

104

dn

Figure 10. Corner plot for the Skara Brae dip for the normalization in B band and B/i′ color and thedepth for the deepest day.

Dips of KIC 8462852 19

0.998

20.998

80.999

41.000

0

Nr′ ,

OG

G

0.999

41.000

01.000

61.001

2

Nr′ ,

TFN

0.90

1.05

1.20

1.35

r′/i ′0.0

0720.0

0800.0

0880.0

0960.0

104

d n

0.998

20.9

988

0.999

41.0

000

Nr′, OGG0.9

994

1.000

01.0

006

1.001

2

Nr′, TFN0.0

0720.0

0800.0

0880.0

0960.0

104

dn

Figure 11. Corner plot for the Skara Brae dip for the normalization in r′ band and r′/i′ color and thedepth for the deepest day.

20 Bodman et al.

0.999

41.000

01.000

61.001

2

NB,

OG

G

1.006

1.007

1.008

1.009

NB,

TFN

1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2

B/i ′0.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

220.0

24

d n

0.999

41.0

000

1.000

61.0

012

NB, OGG1.0

061.0

071.0

081.0

09

NB, TFN0.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

220.0

24

dn

Figure 12. Corner plot for the Angkor dip for the normalization in B band and B/i′ color and the depthfor the deepest day.

Dips of KIC 8462852 21

0.995

50.996

00.996

50.997

00.997

5

Nr′ ,

OG

G

0.999

21.000

01.000

81.001

61.002

4

Nr′ ,

TFN

1.05

1.20

1.35

r′/i ′0.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

220.0

24

d n

0.995

50.9

9600.9

9650.9

9700.9

975

Nr′, OGG0.9

9921.0

0001.0

0081.0

0161.0

024

Nr′, TFN0.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

220.0

24

dn

Figure 13. Corner plot for the Angkor dip for the normalization in r′ band and r′/i′ color and the depthfor the deepest day.