j.carbon.2011.04.062
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
1/10
Preparation of graphene/multi-walled carbon nanotube hybrid
and its use as photoanodes of dye-sensitized solar cells
Ming-Yu Yen a,Min-Chien Hsiao a, Shu-Hang Liao a, Po-I Liu a, Han-Min Tsai a,Chen-Chi M. Ma a,*, Nen-Wen Pu b, Ming-Der Ger b
a Department of Chemical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwanb Department of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, National Defense University, No. 1000, Shingfeng Road, Bade, Taoyuan County
33448, Taiwan
A R T I C L E I N F O
Article history:
Received 25 November 2010
Accepted 18 April 2011
Available online 27 April 2011
A B S T R A C T
This study employed a solution-based method to prepare a 3-D hybrid material comprising
graphene and acid-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The adsorption of
MWCNTs on graphene reduces theppinteraction between graphene sheets resulting from
steric hindrance, providing a subsequent reduction in aggregation. Optimal proportions of
MWCNTs to graphene (2:1) enabled the even distribution of individual MWCNTs deposited
on the surface of the graphene. The hybrid 3-D material was incorporated within a TiO2matrix and used as a working electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The hybrid
material provides a number of advantages over electrodes formed of either MWCNTs or
graphene alone, including a greater degree of dye adsorption and lower levels of charge
recombination. In this study, DSSCs incorporating 3-D structured hybrid materials demon-
strated a conversion efficiency of 6.11%, which is 31% higher than that of conventional
TiO2-based devices.
Crown Copyright 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Since their initial introduction by Gratzel et al., dye-sensitized
solar cells (DSSCs) have been attracting interest from aca-
demics and practitioners alike[1]. Compared with traditional
silicon-based solar cells, the fabrication costs of DSSCs are
lower and the performance is higher. Despite the 11% solarconversion efficiency already achieved with these cells, any
further improvement in performance would provide consider-
ate benefits[2].
Within the photoanode of a DSSC, photo-induced electrons
must overcome grain boundaries to be collected by a conduc-
tive glass. The low transfer efficiency of photo-induced elec-
trons across a TiO2 matrix represents a major limitation of
such nanostructured photoanodes. The inefficient charge
transfer paths cause photo-induced electrons to recombine
with the oxidizing species or tri-iodide ions present in the
electrolyte, resulting in a decrease in photocurrent and photo-
conversion efficiency. Preventing charge recombination can
therefore improve the photo-induced transfer of electrons.
In a previous study[3], we reported that the introduction of
acid-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (acid-MWCNTs)
into the TiO2matrix of the photoanode of DSSCs can improvethe performance of the cell by improving the electron conduc-
tion paths and distribution of the pores. The improvement in
performance thus obtained was limited by the restricted area
of contact between the TiO2nanoparticles and the cylindrical
carbon nanotubes (CNTs).Electron transfer efficiency was also
limited by the resistance of the contacts between interacting
CNTs[4].
Recently, two-dimensional (2-D) structured graphene has
emerged as a conductive nanomaterial showing considerate
0008-6223/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright
2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062
* Corresponding author: Fax: +886 35715408.E-mail address:[email protected](C.M. Ma).
C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6
a v a i l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e nc e d i r e c t . c o m
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c a r b o n
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062http://www.sciencedirect.com/http://www.elsevier.com/locate/carbonhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/carbonhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.04.062 -
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
2/10
promise for use in organic solar cells[58]and DSSCs[912].
Graphene has been progressively developing in the applica-
tion of photoanodes[10,11,13]. Yang et al. introduced graph-
ene into a TiO2matrix as a 2-D bridge for the photoanode of
DSSCs. They demonstrated lower recombination rates,
increased efficiency in electron transport, and enhanced light
scattering through the incorporation of graphene into the
photoanode, contributing to improved cell performance [10].
Sun et al. used the coagulation of commercial TiO2 (P25) on
to Nafion-coated graphene to prepare a photoanode with
good interfacial binding. They demonstrated that the intro-
duction of graphene to TiO2-based working electrodes
improves in both dye adsorption and electron lifetime [13].
Tan et al. reported on the preparation of a photoanode in
which chemically exfoliated graphene was incorporated into
a TiO2 matrix, using a method of molecular grafting. They
determined that the implanted graphene provided additional
transport pathways for photo-induced carriers, leading to an
increase in photocurrent [11]. Due to high specific surface
area and pp interactions, dispersing graphene is very diffi-
cult; however, improving the dispersion of graphene in the
matrix is critical to its successful application in photoanodes.
Two strategies to improve the dispersion of graphene have
previously been reported, namely covalent functionalization
[1416] and non-covalent functionalization using aromatic
molecules[17,18]. The covalent functionalization of graphene
adversely influences the electrical properties of the matrix,
due to the strength of the chemical bonding and the defects
introduced to the surface of the graphene. The non-covalent
functionalization of graphene with aromatic molecules leads
to poor electron transport at the photoanode, due to the high
resistivity of the contacts[19]. Recently, a 3-D hybrid material
was reported comprising pristine MWCNTs (1-D) and chemi-
cally converted graphene (2-D). In this system, the combined
use of these two materials in the matrix resulted in a twin ef-
fect influencing both the electrical conductivity and electro-
chemical performance of the photoanode. In these reports
[2023], 3-D hybrid material exhibited stable dispersion in
the polar solvents H2O, DMF and hydrazine; however, the fab-
rication procedure was somewhat complex, thereby hinder-
ing reproducibility, and the presence of a residual reducing
agent between the graphene sheets following chemical reduc-
tion was another drawback of this method. 3-D structured
nano-materials have also been prepared by aligning CNTs
onto a graphene surface using chemical vapor deposition
(CVD) at high temperatures (exceeding 750 C)[24,25].
In the study described herein, we report a simple approach
to preparing a 3-D hybrid graphene material using a two-step
solution-based method at room temperature. First, graphite
oxide (GO) was fabricated using Staudenmaiers method
[26], followed by heat treatment (1050 C) for 30 s in an inert
atmosphere to form graphene. The graphene was then dis-
persed in an ethanol solution containing acid-MWCNTs fol-
lowed by sonication for 1 h at room temperature to yield a
novel hybrid material, as shown in Fig. 1. The prepared 3-D
hybrid was then incorporated into TiO2-based photoanodes
Fig. 1 The mechanism of acid-MWCNTs in improving the dispersibility of graphene.
3598 C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
3/10
for application in DSSCs. To the best of our knowledge, this is
the first report of a 3-D hybrid photoanode. The dispersibility
of the hybrid material was investigated using UVVis spec-
troscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We
also investigated the photoelectric properties of the 3-D
hybrid photoanode, revealing that the performance of this
hybrid photoanode was better than that of previously re-
ported acid-MWCNT- and graphene-containing photoanodes
[3,10,11,13].
2. Experimental section
2.1. Synthesis of graphene
Natural graphite powder (particle size 70lm, Alfa Aesar)
was oxidized using Staudenmaiers method [26] to produce
GO. In this method, graphite (5 g) was first mixed with sulfuric
(87.5 ml) and nitric (45 ml) acid, and the mixture was stirred.
Following the uniform dispersal of graphite, potassium chlo-
rate (55 g) was slowly added to the mixture and the stirringwas continued for at least 96 h to sure complete oxidation.
The mixture was then added to deionized water, and filtered.
The GO was rinsed repeatedly using deionized water and re-
dispersed three times in a 5% HCl (aq) solution. It was then
washed continuously using deionized water until the pH of
the filtrate was neutral. The GO slurry was dried and pulver-
ized twice. The GO was heated to 1050 C in an inert atmo-
sphere and held at this temperature for 30 s to form
graphene. The acid treatment of MWCNTs was performed
according to a nitric acid washing procedure; one gram of
raw-MWCNTs was boiled in 50 ml of concentrated nitric acid
for 4 h. The MWCNTs were then filtered, washed with deion-
ized water several times to remove residual acid, and dried inan oven at 105 C. This was the method used to produce the
hybrid material. MWCNTs and graphene were combined in
various proportions in 10 ml ethanol followed by ultrasonica-
tion for 1 h.
2.2. Fabrication of the DSSCs
Various composite pastes were prepared for doctoral blading
as described below. TiO2 colloid (prepared according to a re-
lated method[27]), nanostructural material (loading amount:
0.1 wt.%), ethyl cellulose (10 wt.%, TCI Chemical Co., USA) as
a binder, a-terpineol (Showa Chemical Industry Co., Japan) asa surfactant, and anhydrous ethanol (99.5%, Acros Co., USA)
were mixed. Dispersed solutions were obtained using ultra-
sonic horn. The solution was concentrated in an rotary evap-
orator to a final concentration of 20 wt.%, thus the paste was
obtained. To prepare the DSSC photoanodes, fluorine-doped
tin oxide glass (TEC-7, 7Xsquare1, Hartford Glass Co.,
USA) plates were coated with a layer of paste. The coated
electrodes were heated in an air atmosphere at 500 C for
30 min. The thickness and active cell area of the TiO2 film
were approximately 10lm and 0.16 cm2, respectively. Four
composite photoanodes were prepared, each containing
MWCNTs (denoted electrode 1, Ctube 100, CNT Co. Ltd.,
Korea), hybrid material (electrode 2, 0.07 wt.% MWCNTs
and 0.03 wt.% graphene), graphene (electrode 3) or prinstine
TiO2 (electrode 4), respectively. Prior to the fabrication of the
DSSCs, the electrodes were sensitized by soaking for 24 h in
a 3 104 M solution of ruthenium dye (cis-dithiocyanato-
N,N 0-bis(2,20-bipyridyl-4-carboxylicacid-4 0-tetra-butylammo-
nium carboxylate) ruthenium(II); N719, Solaronix SA, Swit-
zerland) in acetonitrile/t-butyl alcohol (v:v= 1:1). The
sensitized electrodes were then immersed in acetonitrile
for 12 h. The DSSC comprised a sensitized working electrode,
a platinized counter (Pt) electrode and an electrolyte with a
25lm hot-melt sealing foil (SX1170-60, Solaronix SA, Swit-
zerland) between each layer. The electrolyte used in this
study consisted of 0.6 M BMII, 0.1 M guanidinium thiocya-
nate, 0.03 M iodine, and 0.5 M TBP in acetonitrile/valeronitri-
le (volume ratio: 85:15)[27].
2.3. Characterization of the dispersion of carbon materials
and composite working electrodes
We investigated the dispersibility of the carbon materials inethanol. We first obtained a calibration curve by measuring
(at 270 nm) the adsorption (Varian, Cary 50, Varian, USA) of
the solution of graphene and MWCNTs at a known concentra-
tion[28]. The tested carbon materials were then suspended in
ethanol with various ratios of MWCNTs to graphene (10 ml)
and sonicated for 1 h. The solutions were centrifuged at
3000 rpm for 15 min, whereupon the absorption of the super-
natants was measured at 270 nm [19,20]. The morphology of
the composites working electrode was then studied using
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S-4700I, Japan),
and the microstructures of the carbon materials was also
investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
(JEOL 2100F, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Thequantity of dye adsorbed into the electrode was determined
by desorbing the dye from the composites into a 0.1 M KOH
aqueous solution, and measuring the absorbance of the
resulting solution using UVvis spectroscopy (Varian, Cary
50, Varian, USA). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were ob-
tained by using an F-4500 Luminescence Spectrometer (Hit-
achi, Japan). The photocurrentvoltage characteristics of the
electrodes were also measured using a 2400 digital source me-
ter (Keithley, USA) under illumination with a Class A sunlight
simulator at 100 mW cm2 (91160A, AM 1.5, Oriel, Newport
Corporation, USA), equipped with an AM 1.5G filter (81088A,
Oriel, Newport Corporation, USA) and a 300 W xenon lamp
(6258, Oriel, Newport Corporation, USA). The intensity of thesimulated incident light was calibrated to 100 mW cm2 using
a reference Si solar cell, calibrated at the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory (NREL) (USA) institutes. Electrochemical
impedance spectra (EIS) were obtained using a potentiostat/
galvanostat equipped with a frequency response analysis
(FRA) module (PGSTAT 302N, Autolab, EcoChemie, Nether-
lands), under illumination of 100 mW cm2. The scanned fre-
quency range was from 105 to 102 Hz, with an applied voltage
of 10 mV. Impedance spectra were analyzed using an equiva-
lent circuit model with Autolab FRA software (v4.9, Eco
Chemie B.V.). The incident photon-to-current conversion effi-
ciency (IPCE) was measured using an IPCE instrument (Model
QEX7, PV measurement Co., USA).
C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6 3599
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
4/10
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Dispersion of the hybrid materials
In our previous work [3], we showed that the aggregation of
acid-MWCNTs seriously restricts the charge transport and
adsorption of dye by the photoanode. In the present study,
acid-MWCNT-graphene hybrids, composed of various ratios
of the two components, were prepared to investigate their
microstructure.
As shown in Fig. 2, both the pristine MWCNTs and the
graphene were found to form unstable suspensions following
sonication, leading to aggregation and subsequent precipita-
tion. The aggregation of pristine MWCNTs and graphene are
known to be due to a lack of hydrophilic groups in their struc-
ture, prohibiting interaction with the polar solvent. Although
the presence of hydrophilic groups (e.g. hydroxyl, epoxy, or
carboxyl) on the surface of graphene and edges of graphene
can improve dispersion, they are generally insufficient to al-
low complete dispersion due to the large hydrophobic surface
area of graphene [29]. In contrast, Fig. 1 shows the nearly
complete dispersion of both acid-MWCNTs and hybrid mate-
rials in solution following sonication. After one week, much of
the suspended acid-MWCNT material had aggregated and
precipitated. This was due to the attraction produced by the
large hydrophobic specific surface of the CNTs, even after
acid-treatment[20]. On the other hand, the hybrid materials
exhibited stable dispersion with no precipitation occurring
at room temperature, even after several weeks. p-Stacking
interactions between the p-conjugated aromatic surface of
the graphene and the wall of the acid-MWCNTs binds the
two components, while the hydrophilic surfaces of the acid-
MWCNTs maintain the dispersion of the construct in solu-
tion. These finding show that the incorporation of acid-
MWCNTs can significantly improve the dispersion of graph-
ene in ethanol.
To optimize the dispersion of acid-MWCNT and graphene
hybrids, a series of hybrid materials composed of various ra-
tios of acid-MWCNTs and graphene were prepared. Hybrid
carbon materials of different compositions (0.1 mg) were sus-
pended in ethanol (10 ml) and sonicated for 1 h. After centri-
fugation, we measured the absorption of the supernatants at
270 nm[19,20]and compared the results using a calibration
curve generated from solutions with known concentrations
of carbon material, thereby allowing the dispersion of each
of the hybrids to be determined.
Fig. 3(a) shows that the dispersion of acid-MWCNTs (1 101 mg ml1) was higher than that of graphene (8 104 mg ml1) by three orders of magnitude, as illustrated in the photo-
graph inFig. 1. These two carbon materials exhibited very dif-
ferent dispersive characteristics, resulting from differences in
their dimensions and surface properties. The inset ofFig. 3(a)
shows that the dispersion of the hybrid materials depends
strongly on the ratio of acid-MWCNTs to graphene. The
microstructure of hybrid materials composed of various ra-
tios of acid-MWCNTs to graphene was investigated using
TEM. When plotted against acid-MWCNT content, the disper-
sibility of the hybrids exhibited three distinct patterns of
behavior. With low concentrations of acid-MWCNTs (ratios
of acid-MWCNTs to graphene from 0.5 to 6), the dispersion
of the hybrid material in ethanol increased with an increase
in the proportion of CNT. As shown inFig. 3(b), when the pro-
portion of acid-MWCNTs to graphene was 2:1, the individual
acid-MWCNTs appears to be evenly separated on the surface
of the graphene due to interaction with the p-conjugated aro-
matic domain on the basal plane of the graphene. The at-
tached acid-MWCNTs formed a steric barrier hindering the
interaction of the graphene sheet with other sheets, thereby
preventing aggregation. Moreover, the hydrophilic groups of
the attached acid-MWCNTs increased the dispersion of the
graphene through interaction with the polar solvent. How-
ever, when higher concentrations of acid-MWCNTs were used
in the hybrids (ratios of 612), the trend of an increase in dis-
persion with increasing acid-MWCNTwas reversed. As shown
in Fig. 3(c), excess acid-MWCNTs were not individually ad-
sorbed onto the surface, but formed bundles or clusters with
a self-aggregated morphology[20]. At the highest tested con-
centrations of acid-MWCNTs (ratios of 1216), the trend of in-
creased dispersion with an increase in acid-MWCNT content
in the hybrid materials was re-established. However, Fig. 3(d)
shows that under these conditions the supernatants were
comprised entirely of acid-MWCNTs, with excess CNTs fully
coagulated on the surface of the graphene in the form of clus-
ters, with all of the graphene located in the precipitate during
centrifugation. It is noteworthy that hybrid materials com-
posed of three different ratios (2, 10, and 14) exhibited very
different microstructural morphology (as seen by TEM), from
those with a similar degrees of dispersibility (as seen by UV
Vis spectroscopy). The ratio of acid-MWCNTs to graphene in
hybrid materials has a significant influence on the surface
morphology of graphene, allowing the control of dispersive
characteristics. The hybrid material exhibiting optimal uni-
form dispersion in solution was achieved at a ratio of 2:1.
As well as influencing the degree of dispersion, acid-
MWCNTs adsorbed on a graphene surface might be expected
to increase the area of the surface available for anchoring to
Fig. 2 Photograph showing the various different carbon
materials dispersed in ethanol (2 mg in 10 ml ethanol, 1 h
sonication). The photographs were taken 1 week after the
preparation of the dispersed carbon materials.
3600 C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
5/10
TiO2 particles, thereby increasing dye adsorption. On the
other hand, the presence of wrinkles on the surface of the
graphene could suppress the conductivity of the basal plane,
due to local bending/curvature effects[30]. The incorporation
of acid-MWCNTs could be expected to connect each p-conju-
gated domain to the graphene, resulting in improved conduc-
tivity. For this reason, we used a hybrid material with a ratio
of 2:1 to prepare composite materials with TiO2particles, for
further investigation of this material as a photoanode.
3.2. Effects of incorporating carbon materials into the TiO2matrix on the surface morphology of the composite film
Several reports[3134]have shown that TiO2particles can be
dispersed effectively through the incorporation of carbon
materials into the TiO2matrix, yielding a coarse surface and
a highly porous morphology. Here, we discuss the influence
of TiO2matrices on dye adsorption and microstructural mor-
phology following the incorporation of acid-MWCNTs, graph-
ene, and hybrid materials into the matrix. UVVis spectra of a
dye solution of 0.3 mM and dye solutions formed by the
desorption of dye from composite films using a 0.1 M KOH
aqueous solution are shown in Fig. 4. When compared with
a pristine TiO2 film (electrode 4), it became evident that a
greater quantity of dye was adsorbed by the composite films,
with the composite film of hybrid carbon material showing
the greatest levels of dye adsorption. We propose that this is
due to the high specific surface area of CNTs and graphene,
providing a large surface area for the anchoring of TiO2particles.
Interestingly, the quantity of dye adsorbed by the electrode
containing graphene (electrode 3) was similar to that of the
electrode containing acid-MWCNTs (electrode 1). Although
Fig. 3 (a) Plot showing the limiting dispersion of acid-MWCNTs and graphene. The inset is a plot of dispersibility with
various ratio of hybrid materials at concentration of 0.1 mg ml1 in ethanol after centrifugation (3000 rpm/15 min). The
transmission electron microscopy images (TEM) of the hybrid materials in various proportions of acid-MWCNTs to graphene:
(b) 2:1; (c) 10:1; and (d) 14:1.
Fig. 4 The UVVis spectra of 0.3 mM dye solution and dye
desorbed from composite working electrodes.
C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6 3601
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
6/10
an increase in the surface area of graphene should result in
an increase in the surface area on which to anchor TiO2par-
ticles, strong ppinteraction between the graphene surfaces
leads to a considerable degree of aggregation with reduced
porosity, thereby decreasing the area available for dye adsorp-
tion. The electrode made of hybrid material (electrode 2)
showed the highest levels of dye adsorption, consistent with
the morphology of the hybrid material, as discussed above.
The acid-MWCNTs distributed on the graphene surface gen-
erated a larger anchoring surface area for TiO2, thereby
enhancing the quantity of dye that could be adsorbed. The
3-D structure of the hybrid material minimizes aggregation
leading to a more uniform distribution of pores.
In a previous study[3], we demonstrated that the degree to
which dye is adsorbed is determined by roughness and spe-
cific surface area. We postulated that the microstructure of
hybrid composites was influenced by the formation of more
porous structures. Fig. 5 shows SEM images of composite
films incorporated with carbon materials. The composite
films clearly exhibit a rough, coarse morphology, which im-
proves their ability to adsorb dye. Due to the formation of
bundles and stacked sheets of carbon material, the surface
of the composite films (electrodes 1 and 3) exhibited a flatter
morphology than that of hybrid composite films. The 3-D
structure of the hybrid material results in high surface asper-
ity in electrode 2. Furthermore, electrode 2 may also possess
greater surface area and a more uniform distribution of pores,
leading to increased dye adsorption. The low porosity and
roughness of electrodes 1 and 3 inhibited dye uptake, proba-
bly due to the tendency of MWCNTs and graphene to aggre-
gate. Due to the many favorable properties of hybrid
material of electrode 2, including large surface area, rough-
ness, and a high degree of dye adsorption, we next incorpo-
rated this electrode to investigate the performance of DSSC
cells.
3.3. Photoelectrical properties of the composite working
electrode
For DSSCs, photoinduced current depends on the quantity of
dye adsorbed on to the electrode [35]. Electronhole (e/h+)
charge recombination significantly reduces the efficiency of
Fig. 5 An illustration of the suggested microstructure of the composites. The SEM micrographs are used to describe the
morphology of the composites: (A) electrode 1 (MWCNTs); (B) electrode 2 (MWCNTs and graphene); (C) electrode 3 (graphene);
and (D) electrode 4 (pristine TiO2).
3602 C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
7/10
photoelectron conversion[3,36,37]. Many authors have shown
that structured carbon materials, including carbon black,
CNTs, and graphene facilitate the transfer of photoelectrons
from the TiO2matrix to a conductive glass and suppress elec-
tronhole (e/h+) charge recombination [3,11,13,36,3840]. In
the present study, we investigated the effects of acid-
MWCNTs, graphene, and hybrid materials in a TiO2 matrix
on the conductive path of the charge transfer. The charge
recombination of the composite electrodes was investigated
using PL spectra (Fig. 6).
Pristine TiO2 film exhibited a broad, intense PL emission
band at approximately 520 nm. The composite electrodes
showed a broad peak at 520 nm, but this had a significantly
lower intensity than that of the pristine TiO2. As the TiO2crys-
tals absorbed photons, excitons were generated, separating
into electrons and holes. The electrons and holes immedi-
ately recombined, resulting in emission. However, the
incorporation of a carbon material into the TiO2matrix sup-
pressed the recombination process, due to the high electrical
conductivity of the carbon materials [3,41]. The emission
intensity of electrode 2 at 520 nm was the lowest of the elec-
trodes tested, which we suggest was due to the 3-D conduc-
tive path and highly anchored surface. This indicates the
efficient collection of photoelectrons by the conductive glass.
To study the effects of conduction path on charge transfer
in the composite electrodes, we studied the transient photo-
current of the DSSCs. The Jsccurve was recorded during one
switched cycle of illumination at 100 mW cm2.Fig. 7shows
that in the case of the DSSC with a hybrid composite elec-
trode, the photoelectrons disappeared more rapidly than they
did in a DSSC with an electrode made with a pristine TiO2ma-
trix. The DSSC with a MWCNT electrode dispersed electrons
more rapidly than the one with the graphene electrode, indi-
cating that the aggregated graphene provided recombination
sites, resulting in a decrease in electron transfer. Electrode 2
provided the DSSC with the most rapid dispersion of photo-
electrons when no photovoltage was applied. This indicates
that photoelectrons are less readily trapped at the surface of
electron trapping sites in the hybrid composite than they
are in pristine TiO2.
Recently, electrochemical impedance has been used to
analyze electrode kinetics of DSSCs [4246]. In general, the
impedance spectra of DSSCs form three semicircles, present-
ing the three different reaction steps in the electrochemical
process, namely the electrochemical reaction at the Pt sur-
face, the charge transfer at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface,
and the diffusion of I=I3 in the electrolyte.Fig. 8and its inset
show the Nyquist plot and equivalent circuit of the DSSCs
employing various working electrodes, and the results are
presented in Table 1. The series resistance values observed
in DSSCs with composite working electrodes were substan-
tially lower than those from a DSSC using pristine TiO2 as
an electrode. The presence of carbon materials improved
the conductivity of the electrode, implying that a decrease
in the value of Rs can improve the fill factor (FF) of DSSCs,
yielding cells with higher performance[47]. Moreover, the Ny-
quist plots of the DSSCs with composite working electrodes
were reduced in the middle frequency region due to the
Fig. 6 Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of pristine TiO2and
carbon materials/TiO2composite films.
Fig. 7 Transient photocurrent spectra of DSSCs with
pristine TiO2and carbon material/TiO2composite working
electrodes.
Fig. 8 Impedance spectra of DSSCs with pristine TiO2and
carbon materials/TiO2composite working electrodes
measured at 100 mW cm2. The inset show the equivalent
circuit of the device.
C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6 3603
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
8/10
presence of carbon material, providing further evidence that
the introduction of carbon materials can improve the conduc-
tive path of the TiO2 matrix. Meanwhile, an increase in the
surface area for charge transfer could also contribute to an in-
crease in electron transfer. Interestingly, the charge transfer
resistance of the graphene electrode was lower than that of
the MWCNT electrode. The larger area per unit mass of graph-
ene provided more conductive paths than CNTs[25]. However,
hybrid materials provide even more conductive pathways for
photo-induced electrons than either the MWCNT or graphene
electrodes. In this system, the graphene provided a conduc-tive pad in its large surface area, while the high aspect ratio
of the CNTs connected the isolated graphene pads, yielding
a more extensive conductive network in the composite work-
ing electrode. The CNTs may also help to smooth the wrin-
kles of graphene, improving the electrical conductivity of
the graphene and increasing the electron transfer at the inter-
face. This analysis is consistent with the results from photo-
luminescence and transient photocurrent spectroscopy
presented herein.
The introduction of hybrid materials into TiO2-based
working electrodes substantially improves electrical conduc-
tivity, effectively reducing the charge recombination at the
TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, which would in turn be ex-pected to improve the photoelectron conversion efficiency
of DSSCs in these electrodes.
3.4. Analysis of DSSC performance using various working
electrodes
To establish the utility of the hybrid composite working elec-
trodes, we investigated the IPCE of DSSCs with various work-
ing electrodes, to identify the effects of the composite on the
generation of photocurrent. As expected, a substantial
improvement in IPCE was observed for the DSSCs that had
composite working electrodes (Fig. 9). This increase in IPCE
was due to the high degree of dye adsorption and low charge
recombination observed for the TiO2matrices containing car-
bon materials. Interestingly, the IPCE spectra of the hybrid
and graphene-containing electrodes showed an improvement
in the conversion efficiency in the red region of light (600
700 nm). This suggests that the pores introduced through
the incorporation of graphene may act as light-harvesting
centers [10]. The impact of low optical absorbance of the
dye at longer wavelengths (Fig. 4) was attenuated by the pores
in the electrodes (electrodes 2 and 3), which improved the
light path to enhance the absorption of the dye, thereby fur-
ther boosting cell performance[48].
The performance of cells with DSSCs was measured using
simulated sunlight (1 Sun AM 1.5). Fig. 10 and Table 2show
the characteristics of the DSSCs fabricated using various
working electrodes. Under illumination, the DSSC with thehybrid composite electrode exhibited a short-circuit photo-
current (Jsc) of 11.27 mA cm2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc)
of 0.78 V and a FF of 0.70, yielding a conversion efficiency (g)
of 6.11%. For the DSSC with a graphene-containing electrode
fabricated using the same method, the values of Voc, Jsc, FF
and g were 0.75 V, 10.27 mA cm 2, 0.69% and 5.35%. The com-
posite working electrodes showed a marked improvement in
photocurrent compared with the pristine TiO2 electrode.
Table 1 Series resistance (Rs) and charge transfer resis-tance (R2) of the DSSCs with various working electrodes.
Electrode no. Rs(Xcm2) R2(Xcm
2)
1 19.0 182 14.0 13.563 17.7 13.71
4 21.8 25.34
Fig. 9 The IPCE spectra of DSSCs with various working
electrodes.
Table 2 The characteristics of the JVcurves of DSSCs withvarious working electrodes.
Electrodeno.
Jsc(mA cm2) Voc(V) FF g(%)
1 10.16 0.77 0.70 5.502 11.27 0.78 0.70 6.113 10.27 0.75 0.69 5.35
4 8.61 0.78 0.67 4.54
Fig. 10 Photocurrent densityvoltage characteristics of the
different electrodes described herein.
3604 C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
9/10
The high specific surface area and improved electrical paths
provided by the structured carbon materials, led to high cell
performance and a decrease in resistance to charge transport
in the DSSC devices. The observed impedance also indicated
that the lowerRsled to an increase in FFas a result of the in-
creased electrical conductivity of the TiO2film[47]. However,
the Voc of the DSSC prepared using the graphene-containing
electrode was lower than that in the DSSC prepared using a
pristine TiO2electrode. This may have been the result of the
poor adhesion of the sensitized TiO2 to the surface of the
graphene, which could lead to increased charge recombina-
tion. An increase in the dark current consequently caused a
decrease inVoc[49]. DSSC prepared using the hybrid compos-
ite electrode showed a remarkable improvement in its perfor-
mance characteristics compared with those of the pristine
TiO2 electrode, providing a 31% increase in photocurrent
and 35% improvement in conversion efficiency, without any
decrease in Voc. By combining the advantages of graphene
and acid-MWCNTs, we achieved both good adhesion at the
interface and a high occupied surface area in the matrix,
thereby producing the high performance observed in the
experiment.
The incorporation of hybrid carbon materials within a 3-D
architectural structure has been shown to increase dye
adsorption, enhance the electrical conductive path through
the generation of a more uniform pore structure, and de-
crease charge recombination in the composite working elec-
trode. The use of hybrid composites as working electrodes
in DSSCs shows great potential, warranting further
investigation.
4. Conclusion
We have described a novel method with which to improve the
dispersive characteristics of thermally-reduced graphene
through the incorporation of acid-MWCNTs. TEM results
and the observed dispersion of hybrid materials support our
contention that the dispersion of graphene can be controlled
by varying the acid-MWCNT loading, thereby lending a un-
ique microstructure to the hybrid material SEM imagery and
observations of dye adsorption indicate that both the surface
morphology and distribution of pores can be improved
through the incorporation of our structured carbon material.
Furthermore, the use of acid-MWCNTs has been shown to im-
prove the surface potential of graphene, improving the
attachment of TiO2 particles. Analysis of the photoelectricproperties of the electrodes showed a reduction in charge
recombination and enhanced electrical conductivity, thereby
leading to improved cell performance. The photocurrent den-
sity of DSSCs using a hybrid material photoanode was in-
creased by 35% and the conversion efficiency was increased
by 31%, compared to DSSCs using a pristine TiO2photoanode.
This was due to the increased quantity of adsorbed dye, re-
duced charge transfer resistance and an enhanced electron
transport rate, resulting from the incorporation of hybrid
material. Our findings demonstrate that 3-D structured hy-
brid materials possess great potential for applications related
to DSSCs, and merit further investigation.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the National Science Council, Tai-
wan, Republic of China under contract NSC-100-ET-E-007-001-
ET, for financial support, and to the National Defense Univer-
sity for the supplement of graphene.
R E F E R E N C E S
[1] ORegan B, Gratzel M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cellbased on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2films. Nature1991;353(6346):73740.
[2] Gao F, Wang Y, Shi D, Zhang J, Wang M, Jing X, et al. Enhancethe optical absorptivity of nanocrystalline TiO2film with highmolar extinction coefficient ruthenium sensitizers for highperformance dye-sensitized solar cells. J Am Chem Soc2008;130(32):107208.
[3] Yen C-Y, Lin Y-F, Liao S-H, Weng C-C, Huang C-C, Hsiao Y-H,et al. Preparation and properties of a carbon nanotube-based
composite photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells.Nanotechnology 2008;19:37530513.
[4] Yu A, Ramesh P, Sun X, Bekyarova E, Itkis ME, Haddon RC.Enhanced thermal conductivity in a hybrid graphitenanoplatelet carbon nanotube filler for epoxy composites.Adv Mater 2008;20(24):47404.
[5] Guo CX, Yang HB, Sheng ZM, Lu ZS, Song QL, Li CM. Layeredgraphene/quantum dots for photovoltaic devices. AngewChem Int Ed 2010;49(17):30147.
[6] Eda G, Lin YY, Miller S, Chen CW, Su WF, Chhowalla M.Transparent and conducting electrodes for organicelectronics from reduced graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett2008;92:2333057.
[7] Liu ZF, Liu Q, Huang Y, Ma YF, Yin SG, Zhang XY, et al. Organicphotovoltaic devices based on a novel acceptor material:
graphene. Adv Mater 2008;20(20):392430.[8] Liu Q, Liu ZF, Zhong XY, Yang LY, Zhang N, Pan GL, et al.
Polymer photovoltaic cells based on solution-processablegraphene and P3HT. Adv Funct Mater 2009;19(6):894904.
[9] Chen J, Li K, Luo Y, Guo X, Li D, Deng M, et al. A flexiblecarbon counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells.Carbon 2009;47(11):27048.
[10] Yang N, Zhai J, Wang D, Chen Y, Jiang L. Two-dimensionalgraphene bridges enhanced photoinduced charge transportin dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 2010;4(2):88794.
[11] Tang Y-B, Lee C-S, Xu J, Liu Z-T, Chen Z-H, He Z, et al.Incorporation of graphenes in nanostructured TiO2films viamolecular grafting for dye-sensitized solar cell application.ACS Nano 2010;4:34828.
[12] Wang X, Zhi L, Mullen K. Transparent, conductive grapheneelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett2007;8(1):3237.
[13] Sun S, Gao L, Liu Y. Enhanced dye-sensitized solar cell usinggraphene-TiO2photoanode prepared by heterogeneouscoagulation. Appl Phys Lett 2010;96(8):0831135.
[14] Compton OC, Dikin DA, Putz KW, Brinson LC, Nguyen ST.Electrically conductive alkylated graphene paper viachemical reduction of amine-functionalized graphene oxidepaper. Adv Mater 2010;22(8):8926.
[15] Sharma R, Baik JH, Perera CJ, Strano MS. Anomalously largereactivity of single graphene layers and edges towardelectron transfer chemistries. Nano Lett 2010;10(2):398405.
[16] Shen J, Hu Y, Li C, Qin C, Ye M. Synthesis of amphiphilicgraphene nanoplatelets. Small 2009;5(1):825.
C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6 3605
-
8/13/2019 j.carbon.2011.04.062
10/10
[17] Su Q, Pang S, Alijani V, Li C, Feng X, Mullen K. Composites ofgraphene with large aromatic molecules. Adv Mater2009;21(31):31915.
[18] Ghosh A, Rao KV, George Subi J, Rao CNR. Noncovalentfunctionalization, exfoliation, and solubilization of graphenein water by employing a fluorescent coronene carboxylate.Chem Eur J 2010;16(9):27004.
[19] Liu Y, Gao L, Sun J, Wang Y, Zhang J. Stable Nafion-functionalized graphene dispersions for transparentconducting films. Nanotechnology 2009;20(46):46560511.
[20] Zhang C, Ren L, Wang X, Liu T. Graphene oxide-assisteddispersion of pristine multiwalled carbon nanotubes inaqueous media. J Phys Chem C 2010;114(26):1143540.
[21] Kim J, Cote LJ, Kim F, Yuan W, Shull KR, Huang J. Grapheneoxide sheets at interfaces. J Am Chem Soc2010;132(23):81806.
[22] Kim Y-K, Min D-H. Durable large-area thin films of graphene/carbon nanotube double layers as a transparent electrode.Langmuir 2009;25(19):113026.
[23] Tung VC, Chen L-M, Allen MJ, Wassei JK, Nelson K, Kaner RB,et al. Low-temperature solution processing ofgraphenecarbon nanotube hybrid materials for high-performance transparent conductors. Nano Lett2009;9(5):194955.
[24] Fan Z, Yan J, Zhi L, Zhang Q, Wei T, Feng J, et al. A three-dimensional carbon nanotube/graphene sandwich and itsapplication as electrode in supercapacitors. Adv Mater2010;22(33):37238.
[25] Su Q, Liang Y, Feng X, Mullen K. Towards free-standinggraphene/carbon nanotube composite films via acetylene-assisted thermolysis of organocobalt functionalizedgraphene sheets. Chem Commun 2010:827981.
[26] Staudenmaier L. Verfahren zur Darstellung der Graphitsaure.Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft1898;31(2):14817.
[27] Ito S, Murakami TN, Comte P, Liska P, Gratzel C, NazeeruddinMK, et al. Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cellswith solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%.Thin Solid Films 2008;516(14):46139.
[28] Tan B, Wu Y. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on anatase TiO2nanoparticle/nanowire composites. J Phys Chem B2006;110(32):159328.
[29] Ramanathan T, Abdala AA, Stankovich S, Dikin DA, HerreraAlonso M, Piner RD, et al. Functionalized graphene sheets forpolymer composites. Nat Nano 2008;3(6):32731.
[30] Xu K, Cao P, Heath JR. Scanning tunneling microscopycharacterization of the electrical properties of wrinkles inexfoliated graphene monolayers. Nano Lett2009;9(12):444651.
[31] Anson A, Jagiello J, Parra JB, Sanjuan ML, Benito AM, MaserWK, et al. Porosity, surface area, surface energy, andhydrogen adsorption in nanostructured carbons. J Phys
Chem B 2004;108(40):158206.[32] Lambert TN, Chavez CA, Hernandez-Sanchez B, Lu P, Bell NS,Ambrosini A, et al. Synthesis and characterization oftitaniagraphene composites. J Phys Chem C2009;113(46):1981223.
[33] Williams G, Seger B, Kamat PV. TiO2-graphene compositesUV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide. ACSNano 2008;2(7):148791.
[34] Yen C-Y, Lin Y-F, Hung C-H, Tseng Y-H, Ma C-C, Chang M-C,et al. The effects of synthesis procedures on the morphologyand photocatalytic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/TiO2composites. Nanotechnology 2008;19:04560414.
[35] Gratzel M. Molecular photovoltaics that mimicphotosynthesis. Pure Appl Chem 2001;73(3):45967.
[36] Kongkanand A, Martnez Domnguez R, Kamat PV. Single wallcarbon nanotube scaffolds for photoelectrochemical solarcells capture and transport of photogenerated electrons.Nano Lett 2007;7(3):67680.
[37] Gratzel M. Conversion of sunlight to electric power bynanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells. J PhotochemPhotobiol A 2004;164(13):314.
[38] Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI,Grigorieva IV, et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Diracfermions in graphene. Nature 2005;438(7065):197200.
[39] Kamat PV, Haria M, Hotchandani S. C60 cluster as an electronshuttle in a Ru(II)-polypyridyl sensitizer-basedphotochemical solar cell. J Phys Chem B 2004;108(17):516670.
[40] Jang S-R, Vittal R, Kim K-J. Incorporation of functionalizedsingle-wall carbon nanotubes in dye-sensitized TiO2solarcells. Langmuir 2004;20(22):980710.
[41] Yu Y, Yu JC, Chan C-Y, Che Y-K, Zhao J-C, Ding L, et al.Enhancement of adsorption and photocatalytic activity ofTiO2by using carbon nanotubes for the treatment of azo dye.Appl Catal B-Environ 2005;61(12):111.
[42] Park NG, Kim K, Kang M, Ryu K, Chang S, Shin YJ. Chemicalsintering of nanoparticles: a methodology for low-temperature fabrication of dye-sensitized TiO2films. AdvMater 2005;17(19):234953.
[43] Lee K-M, Suryanarayanan V, Ho K-C. Influences of differentTiO2morphologies and solvents on the photovoltaicperformance of dye-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources2009;188(2):63541.
[44] Wang Q, Moser J-E, Gratzel M. Electrochemical impedancespectroscopic analysis of dye-sensitized solar cells. J PhysChem B 2005;109(31):1494553.
[45] van de Lagemaat J, Park NG, Frank AJ. Influence of electricalpotential distribution, charge transport, and recombinationon the photopotential and photocurrent conversionefficiency of dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2solar cells: astudy by electrical impedance and optical modulationtechniques. J Phys Chem B 2000;104(9):204452.
[46] Han L, Koide N, Chiba Y, Islam A, Mitate T. Modeling of anequivalent circuit for dye-sensitized solar cells: improvementof efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells by reducing internalresistance. Comptes Rendus Chimie 2006;9(56):64551.
[47] Lee K-M, Hu C-W, Chen H-W, Ho K-C. Incorporating carbonnanotube in a low-temperature fabrication process for dye-sensitized TiO2solar cells. Sol Energ Mater Sol Cells2008;92(12):162833.
[48] Hore S, Vetter C, Kern R, Smit H, Hinsch A. Influence of
scattering layers on efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells.Sol Energ Mater Sol Cell 2006;90(9):117688.[49] Yu H, Zhang S, Zhao H, Xue B, Liu P, Will G. High-performance
TiO2photoanode with an efficient electron transport networkfor dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C2009;113(36):1627782.
3606 C A R B O N 4 9 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 5 9 73 6 0 6