jd academic mentoring – exam skills tuesday, 27 may 2014 law lecture theatre 1
TRANSCRIPT
JD Academic Mentoring – Exam Skills
Tuesday, 27 May 2014Law Lecture Theatre 1
Law exams at UWAAimed at assessing:
• Your knowledge of the law;
• Your ability to engage with legal principles; and
• Your ability to analyse how the law applies to various facts.
Usually two kinds of questions in law exams:
• Problem questions / hypothetical
• Short essay / longer essay
Number of questions vary and reading time provided.
1
Preparing for an examMost law exams are open book – but don’t be fooled!
Writing exam notes:
• Begin writing notes early in semester
• Structure/organise notes in a clear and logical way
• Keep sentences short – e.g. “Principle X: Case name”
• Small summaries of cases with facts help a lot
• Coloured tabs work well
• Summary sheets / issue checklists
• Use of past student notes
2
Preparing for an exam (cont)After you’ve prepared your exam notes:
• Print your notes and get them bound
• Revise your notes and become familiar with them
• Highlight important parts and annotate if needed
• Go over past tutorial/class questions
• Go over past exam papers provided on CMO: http://www.is.uwa.edu.au/information-resources/cmo
• Try to answer past exams in exam conditions (using techniques outlined later in this presentation)
• Discuss answers with friends and seek lecturer feedback
3
Preparing for an exam (cont)Other things to consider before the exam:
• Allocate time based on marks (use a sticky note)
• Don’t try and cram last minute
• Relax before the exam
• Don’t drink coffee before the exam
• Bring your own watch!
4
In the exam - planningWhen the exam begins – take some time to plan:
• Use your 10 minutes to read the question and facts carefully – don’t miss crucial detail
• Highlight and annotate the question for later
• Read exam instructions carefully
• Take note of your audience and what you’re being asked to do
• Take a few minutes to construct a rough outline / checklist (possibly left side of the booklet)
• Identify causes of action, issues and parties involved
5
In the exam – writingAfter reading and planning – begin writing. There are a few good techniques to keep in mind about the format of your answer:
• Choose an ‘audience’ and stick to it – first person or third person if question is legal opinion
• Make authorities stand out – underline cases
• Use appropriate abbreviations (case names, pronouns)
• Headings and structure are your best friends!
• Answer in a logical and methodical way using IRAC
• Deal with issues and parties separately (generally)
• Keep your sentences short
6
In the exam – writing (cont)Keeping in mind these stylistic considerations, make the substance of your exam answer great:
• Keep the purpose of a legal opinion in mind – predicting an outcome
• The key to a good exam answer is analysis – identify the law and apply the law to the facts you are given
• Express the law clearly and back it up with authority
• Don’t forget about the facts – which do you rely upon?
• Make reasonable assumptions if needed
• Analyse various arguments but decide on the best one
7
In the exam – writing (cont)
8
• Analogise or distinguish case facts (big ticks!) – but don’t be too descriptive
• Be strategic in where you go into detail – uncontested elements etc.
• Explore outcomes and remedies – this is what the client is ultimately after
• Conclude on single issues as well as overall
In the exam – writing (cont)A good exam answer using IRAC to deal with a specific issue would look something like:
• Issue: The issue is whether there is a valid contract between X and Y. The elements of a valid contract are: (1) Offer; (2) Acceptance (3) Consideration … etc
• Rule (Offer): An offer of contract exists where…: Case authority
• Application (Offer): There appears to be a valid offer in this case because [refer to facts of problem]. Although in Case 123 [ABC] happened, the facts of the present case are distinguishable because…
• Conclusion: It is likely that a valid offer has been made by X
9
In the exam – writing (cont)
10
Things to avoid when writing an exam answer:
• Just recounting legal principles: this demonstrates knowledge but not analysis
• Giving history of contentious legal principles – try to summarise the current opposing views
• Lengthy quotations from authorities
• Repeating facts from the question or cases
• Citing secondary sources (textbooks etc) before primary sources (cases and legislation)
• Reaching legal conclusions before stating the law
In the exam – writing (cont)
11
One last thing to always keep in mind:
• DON’T spend too much time on one question – allocated marks indicate how much time a question needs