jill golightly head of research office case study 2: developing and implementing an integrated...
TRANSCRIPT
Jill Golightly
Head of Research Office
Case Study 2: Developing and implementing an integrated system to support researchers: the Newcastle experience
The Session
Context Why make the change What did we do Benefits for researchers and managers How did we do it Demo What worked well/not so well
Newcastle In Context
3 large faculties and 31 academic units 14,000 UG students 5,000 PG students 2,176 academic staff Research Income £81M Submitted 964 staff to 38 UoAs in RAE
3
D Day
1st November 2005
Data Systems in the RAE
Issues
Inefficient use of academic time Data in different systems – difficult to get data from
one place Data quality poor – who was responsible for
amending? Institutional Repository well-established but lack of
take up eprints established but duplication of effort required Weak links between services supporting research Lack of understanding about the importance of
research data outside the key services
What did we do
January 08 hit EB with proposal for integrated system (written by RO and Library)
Redevelop current Institutional Repository with improved features
Successful bid – 2 year funding Researcher focussed
7
My-Impact
One system, limit duplication and inaccuracy of data - data right first time!
Hub for all research data Focuses strongly on the individual Enhanced repository – claim outputs Link to eprints Inclusion of research project and PGR data Drives the web profiles Enhanced role for services REF scenario planning
MyIMPACT
Benefits for the Researcher
Quick, reliable access to all research data via consolidation of system Their information: research, students, outputs etc Providing a more efficient way for them to record and
confirm contribution
Help support research and career Maximise exposure to outputs externally via
eprints - impact Free up time by claiming outputs from WoS Provision of bibliometrics
11
Benefits for Research Management
Quick, reliable access to all research data via consolidation of systems
Improve quality, breadth, quantity of data Monitor (and manage?) research performance
internally External returns and assessments REF management tool Improve the branding and marketing of research
12
Mechanisms
Steering Group established with top level champion (PVC R&I)
Corporate system Multi-team priorities/specifications
13
Progress to date
Outputs and eprints Research projects PGR records Individual Report
Phase 1: Library System
Purchased WoS (1900) and Scopus (1996) data 4 Data sets: WoS, Scopus, MyProfiles, eprints Library Interface to de-duplicate and keep the
‘best’ record Library takes responsibility for the record and
locks it after checking Data amendments direct from individual to
Library: keeps data accurate Checked 41,500 (2006-11)records in 18 months
Phase 2: Publications Downloading
2 ways to add an output to MyImpact: manually or by emails from WoS (Scopus records added in bi-annually)
Once identified, all outputs to be bibliographically checked by the Library
Implemented in October 2009
Phase 2: E-Prints integration
Facility to upload PDF full-text into MyImpact to feed through to E-Prints
Will be implemented as part of the next phase – October 2009
Increase the impact of Newcastle research via open access database
User View
18
Searching Database
Manual Adding
Change Request
User Claim
Timescale for claiming outputs
Library Filtering
Library View
Library Duplicate Checking
Future Phases: 2011
Transfer of web profiles to MyImpact REF scoring and scenario modelling Inclusion of citations and analyses Support for promotions, PDR, CVs Inclusion of teaching quality data
Challenges and Issues
Complex technology- project has overrun Project management process did not work Parallel systems in use were confusing Some areas do not use the system – can the REF
act as a carrot? Anticipating what information will be required for
the REF ‘locking’ out academics from editing their own
records – change of culture
28
What worked well
In-house development Sold the researcher benefits before the
management Cross Service working Phased delivery Advocacy of eprints Identified champions at academic unit level High –level support from Executive – got in
quick! Telling everyone who would listen!
29