jip standardized subsea...

DNV GL © 2013 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENERDNV GL © 2014

OIL & GAS

JIP Standardized Subsea Documentation

1

General Presentation

Jan Ragnvald Torsvik, JIP Co-Chairman, StatoilJulia Mazurova Henriksen, JIP Co-Chairman, Aker SolutionsJarl S. Magnusson, JIP Project Manager, DNV GLPetter Myrvang, JIP Project Sponsor, DNV GL

DNV GL © 2013

The Big Picture

2

Increased

cooperation and

integration

Accidents and

emissions

Increased profit

margins

Balance O&G

supplies and

demands

Increased

responsibility and

liability

Stronger laws,

rules and

regulations

Available,

accurate, agile,

authentic and

actual

documentation

Exploration, new

methods and

technologies

Less cost, time

and resources,

agile production

Transparency and

a sharing

paradigm

Image from; http://scriptshadow.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/rUNFYnD.jpg

http://scriptshadow.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/rUNFYnD.jpg

DNV GL © 2013

FMC etc

Minimum dataprovision by suppliers

AK SolutionsGE Vetco Grey

Statoil etc

Minimum data requirement for users

ExxonMobilShell

System Documentation• Scope and interfaces• System description and

deliverables

Generate Minimum Dataset

+ Minimum

= Subsea DataStandard

Agree Standard MRB contents

Key tasks – Mission from Norsk Olje og Gass (early 2013)

Establish Data Definitions• Review industry standards• Survey of existing user definitons• Gain consensus on common data packages

Company specific data requirements

• Tagging and formatting• Verification• Engineering/training data • Data entry inc. MC, H/O,

docs

Product List• Tree• Wellhead• Tubing Hanger system• Choke Module• Integrated Template

structure• Manifold• Controls• Umbilical• Tie back/installation systems• Work over systems

DNV GL © 2013

Scope SPS/SURF

4

SPS in Phase 1

+SURF in Phase 2

Owned vs. rented

Permanent vs. temporary

Image from Ibruk/Subsea1. Subsea Production System (SPS), Subsea Umbilicals Risers and Flowlines (SURF)

DNV GL © 2013

Constru

ctio

n

Manufa

ctu

ring

Com

mis

sio

nin

g

Decom

mis

sio

nScra

ppin

g

Concept

FE

ED

Te

nder/B

id

Contra

ct

Engin

eerin

g/P

rocure

ment

Te

stin

g

Mechanic

al C

om

ple

tion

Opera

tions &

Main

tenance

Busin

ess

Develo

pm

ent

OPERATOR

SUPPLIER

Insta

llatio

n

Dis

patc

h

Scope SPS/SURF Lifecycle, information flow…

5

CONTRACTOR

DNV GL © 2013

Current Participants as of August 2014

6

Company/Org Type Fee

Aker Solutions EPC 150

Centrica OP 250

Det Norske OP 250

Det Norske Veritas, DNV GL EPC -

FMC TI EPC 150

GE EPC 150

GDF Suez OP 250

Kongsberg EPC 150

Lundin OP 250

Norsk Olje og Gass (Observer) ORG -

Oceaneering SUP 100

OneSubsea EPCI 150

PTIL (Observer) ORG -

RWE OP 250

Statoil OP 250

Subsea7 EPCI 150

Subsea Valley (represents over 200 suppliers) ORG 50

SUNCOR OP 250

TOTAL 18 2800

DNV GL © 2013

JIP Agreement (Collective Contract)

7

DNV GL © 2013

JIP Subsea Documentation, Project Plan 2014-2016

9

JIP Phase 1 – Doc types Clean up (2014)

1. CTR1 – Project Management2. CTR2 – Marketing and awareness building3. CTR3 – WS, Scoping of typical subsea systems, products and doc types4. CTR4 – WS, Minimum set of documentation for a subsea field5. CTR5 – WS, Identify company specific/additional requirements, standard

Basic, Premium and Supreme Doc Sets6. CTR6 – WS, Development of data and documentation definitions7. CTR7 – WS, Package the above into an RP, version 1

JIP Phase 2 – Doc Metrics/Metadata Clean up (2015)

1. CTR1 – Project Management2. CTR2 – WS, Update Matrix 1 and 2, extended scope to include SURF3. CTR3 – WS, Develop a MRB-, ITP- and Dispatch Dossier matrix4. CTR4 – WS, Harmonize admin requirements, doc-admin-info, etc.5. CTR5 – WS, Conduct a Pilot activity, GAP-analysis6. CTR6 – WS, Recommended Practice, version 2

JIP Phase 3 – Integrated Doc DB (2016)

1. CTR1 – Project Management2. CTR2 – WS, Suggest an integrated, shared solution (i.e. Licence2Share)3. CTR3 – WS, Improved trust, quality, security, transparency4. CTR4 – WS, Recommended Practise, version 3

STD

Doc Set

Create

benefits

Doc

Admin

Use and

prove

benefits

Doc (DB)

Sharing

Implement

benefits

Mission from Norsk Olje og Gass (2012-13)

DNV GL © 2013

Project Planning for 2014

10

Meetings Date and time Location

JIP SC #6 2014-06-03, kl. 09.00-12.00 Aker Solutions, Fornebu

CTR 5, Workshop Day 1 2014-06-03, kl. 13.00-16.00 Aker Solutions, Fornebu

CTR 5, Workshop Day 2 2014-06-04, kl. 09.00-16.00 Aker Solutions, Fornebu

JIP SC #6 2014-08-20, kl. 09.00-11.00 Virtual, revise decisions, prepare CTR 6, plan for 2015

CTR 6, Workshop Day 1 2014-09-17, kl. 09.00-16.00 DNV GL, Høvik

CTR 6, Workshop Day 2 2014-09-18, kl. 09.00-13.00 DNV GL, Høvik

JIP SC #7 2014-09-18, kl. 13.00-16.00 DNV GL, Høvik

JIP SC #8 2014-10-22, kl. 09.00-11.00 Virtual, revise decisions, prepare CTR 7, plan for 2015 and 2016

JIP SC #10 2014-11-19, kl. 09.00-12.00 Stavanger? (Oceaneering)?

CTR 7, Workshop Day 1 2014-11-19, kl. 13.00-16.00 Stavanger? (Oceaneering)?

CTR 7, Workshop Day 2 2014-11-20, kl. 09.00-16.00 Stavanger? (Oceaneering)?

JIP SC #10 2014-12-10, kl. 09.00-12.00 Aker Solutions, Fornebu

CHRISTMAS Activity 2014-12-10, kl. 12.00-14.00 Christmas Smörgåsbord, close to Fornebu

Finalization of Matrix #1, (Matrix #2 moved to November)

Document Definitions

First look at the RP

Subsea1 Demonstration

DNV GL © 2013

Method of scoping Subsea Systems and its Doc Sets

11

Document Types

Subsea

Systems &

functions

OO

O

O

O

O

O

O OO O O

O

O

O

O

O

OO

O

Required document for a system/function. Used for:

O (Operation and Maintenance)

E (Engineering)

C (Commissioning)

D (Dispatch)

This document:

- should be shared/delivered (paper, pdf or DB access)

- should NOT be shared/delivered (remains with originator)

GA

XT Valve O O

DNV GL © 2013

We have a Matrix #1 and #2

12

#1 Operator – Contractor

Systems

Functions

Documents delivered to the Operator

or kept by the Contractor #2 Contractor - Supplier

Product

Categories

Components

Documents delivered to the Contractor

or kept by the Supplier

Difference in types of documents?

Difference in type of

breakdown representation

Savings in #2, could

have a positive effect

in #1

DNV GL © 2013

Matrix #1 (Operator – Contractor)

13

Systems/functions

Required documentation

Documents Savings?

DNV GL © 2013

Matrix #2 (Contractor – Supplier)

14

Product Categories and Products

Required documentation

Documents

Savings?

DNV GL © 2013

Creating an Recommended Practise (RP)

15

Contents

SECTION 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Objective .......................................................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Purpose of this recommended practice ........................................................................................... 4

1.3 Scope and limitations of this recommended practice ..................................................................... 5

1.4 Point-of-views from Government authorities ................................................................................. 5

SECTION 2 Application ..................................................................................................................................... 5

2.1 Use and users of this recommended practice ................................................................................. 5

2.2 Regulatory requirements ................................................................................................................. 5

2.3 Relationship to other codes and standards ..................................................................................... 7

2.4 Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... 7

SECTION 3 Scoping of systems and functions .................................................................................................. 7

3.1 Definitions and limitations ............................................................................................................... 7

3.2 SPS and SURF .................................................................................................................................... 7

3.3 Method for Company Specific Requirements .................................................................................. 7

SECTION 4 Std Subsea Documentation Set ...................................................................................................... 7

4.1 Matrix 1, Operator-Contractor......................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Matrix 2, Contractor-Supplier .......................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Matrix 3, Detailing of Manufacturing Record Book (MRB) .............................................................. 7

4.2 Matrix 2, Detailing if Inspection Test Protocol (ITP) ........................................................................ 7

4.2 Matrix 2, Detailing of Dispatch Dossier (DD) ................................................................................... 7

SECTION 5 Applied usage of the Std Subsea Documentation Set .................................................................... 7

5.1 Subsea1, interactive demo - creating an ITT (or MDL) .................................................................... 7

5.2 Document Control, sharing of Administrative Information ............................................................. 7

5.3 Document definitions....................................................................................................................... 7

SECTION 6 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................... 7

6.1 Terms and definitions ...................................................................................................................... 7

6.2 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 7

6.3 Document definitions....................................................................................................................... 7

DNV GL © 2013

References to/from our RP?

16

References to doc definitions

(NORSOK, Aker, Det Norske)

References to system/functions

definitions (Subsea1)

DNV GL © 2013

Visualization and marketing activities

18

SharePoint Site

Press-releaseWeb-site

Minutes, reports, reference

material, presentations,

visits and interviews

Flyer

DNV GL © 2013

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

www.dnvgl.com

Thanks.!!

19

Jarl S. Magnusson

[email protected]

+47 911 06584