jln information technology track: collaborating across countries - standards, opportunities and...
TRANSCRIPT
JLN Information Technology Track: Collaborating Across Countries - Standards, Opportunities and Strategies
David Lubinski, PATHCees Hesp, PharmAccess FoundationKate Wilson, PATH
24 January 2012Bangkok, Thailand
JLN Information Technology Track Welcome and Introductions
Please take 5 minutes to introduce yourself to someone at your table you don’t already know
Share your top priority and biggest challenge for information systems in 2012
Agenda
ListenLearn
AnalyzeDocument
Share
What is our approach?
What have we done/will do?
Introduce project and hold initial
workshop in Bangkok
Develop process framework with experts;
Build draft process matrix; Draft country level task
flows
Country consultationsThailand May 3-13
India (RSBY) – Jul 13-15India (Aarogyasri) – Jul 18-20
Draft first set of common task flows and requirements for
core work group
Develop health data dictionary paper series
and tool
Requirements Development Work
JLN Information Technology Track Work
Convene core work group with JLN members to review task
flows and agree on global requirements;
Finalize and share requirements.
Develop future plan for IT track based on country feedback
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Host online survey; Interview JLN country
respondents; Conduct stakeholder
mapping
What is the benefit of shared common functional requirements?
Shared CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Shared Common Solutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
1st
Country 2nd
Multi-Country Solution
Collaborative
The Cost Effectiveness of Common Requirements, Standards and Solutions
Cost
Time
Multi-Country Requirements & StandardsCollaborative
1st
Country 2nd
Shared Common Architecture Tools
Shared CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Shared Common Solutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Agenda
Joint Learning Network
How Standards Make Life Easier
Harmonize to Interoperate
Cees J. HespChief Technology OfficerPharmAccess Foundation
Contents Definitions Examples How standards make life easier Advantages / challenges Capability-maturity levels Standards needed in healthcare
administration / financing / insurance Call for action
Definitions Standardization
Formulation, publication, and implementation of guidelines, rules, and specifications for common and repeated use, aimed at achieving an optimum degree of order or uniformity in a given context, discipline, or field.
HarmonizationAdjustment of differences and inconsistencies among different measurements, methods, procedures, schedules, specifications, or systems to make them uniform or mutually compatible.
InteroperabilityAbility of computers programs to interact with each other regardless of the underlying architecture and/or operating system(s). Interoperability is feasible through (hardware and software) components that conform to open standards.
From a New Institutional Economics point of view, standardization starts with a social problem known as the “coordination dilemma”. Standards, as “voluntary norms”, serve to facilitate the resolution of coordination dilemmas and to realize mutual gains.
Globally, shipping costs have dropped 70%
Example 1: Physical World (Freight Containers)
First 110 different documents, now 1
Example 2: Administration (European Union Driver’s Licenses)
Example 3: e-claims in the Netherlands
16
Key Figures Description
100,000,000 Claims per year
40,000 Healthcare providers
500 Claims software packages
20 Health insurers (payers)
Key Solution(s)
1 Central claims-routing hub
1 Common set of standards, formats, etc.
1 National registry for patients, providers, and insurers respectively
Savings
€400-600 mio Annually, in administrative cost alone
billions In rationalized purchasing & planning
How Standards Make Life Easier
No Standard(s) Standard(s)
Advantages Reduced complexity & cost Reduced error-rate(s)
Increased predictability & transparency Increased processing speed Increased (data) quality & reliability Increased efficiency & scalability
Enables supply-chain integration Less chances of vendor lock-in Easier to train staff on, easier to find staff trained in
Changes apples and oranges into comparable fruits / smoothies
Challenges
The good thing about standards is that there are so many of them... Joke by former HL7 chairman in the Netherlands
Some standards require a high level of sophistication! ICD-10 ≈ 68,000 diagnoses, 87,000 procedures
Not all standards created are equally practical ISO 3166 country codes (2-letter, 3-letter, 3-digit) Netherlands = “NL”, “NLD”, or “528”
Standardization vs flexibility...?
Choose Standards That Align With Your Ability to Implement Them
Simple Model
Choose standards that solve real needs and problems, not as an academic exercise
Capability Maturity Model
Level 3 Run
Level 2 Walk
Level 1 Crawl
Level 5 Optimizing
Level 4 Managed
Level 3 Defined
Level 2 Repeatable
Level 1 Ad Hoc/Chaotic
Whether you use a simple or sophisticated model to create your standards road map…
?
Standards Needed in Healthcare Administration / Financing / Insurance
Unique identifiers Patients, Providers, Facilities, Insurers Diagnoses, Drugs, Procedures, Investigations, Outcomes
Common (electronic/paper) forms Registration, encounter(s) Claims Referral letters
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Health metrics, statistical data
Messaging Standards21
Available Standards in Healthcare
Standard Description
HL7 Health Level 7
SNOMED - CT Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms
DICOM Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine
LOINC Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes
openEHR Electronic Health Records (ISO 12052:2006)
SDMX-HD Statistical Data and Metadata Exchange – Health Domain
ICD-9/10 Internation Classification of Diseases – WHO
CEN/ISO 13606 Electronic Health Records
Limited standards for health administration, finance & insurance
Call for Action
The Health Data Dictionary (HDD) as the foundation for standardizing data
Continued work in 2012-2013 on an HDD tool Create & share common definitions Collaborative (web-based) platform & community
Countries have heard the call to action!
23
Agenda
Joint Learning Network
Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth)
Alvin B. MarceloChief Information Officer
About PhilHealth
Established by an act of congress in 1995 (Republic Act 7875)
- allocate national resources for health- universality- equity- responsiveness- social solidarity
PhilHealth
together with the Department of Health, works towards assuring universal health coverage to Filipinos
Alvin B. MarceloPresently PHIC senior vice-president and chief information officerFormerly:•associate professor of surgery and health informatics, University of the Philippines Manila•director of the National Telehealth Center•program coordinator for the Master of Science in Health Informatics•program manager for UNDP's International Open Source Network ASEAN+3
-
State of Country Health Information SystemGovernance is emerging but still strugglingMultisectoral approach is underway but still seeking clear directionsSector-wide enterprise architecture is lackingStandards, to a large extent, are still undefinedNo defined curriculum for developing the human resource-base for HIS
State of PhilHealth Information SystemLargely a mix of legacy systems With defined standards (ICD-10, CPT)Discontiguous processes prevent experiencing the full benefit of automation
Standards Needed
Identifiers (person, patient, provider)Health data dictionaryData exchangeSecurity
Standards Implemented
ICD-10 for diagnosisCPT for procedures (with local relative value units)PhilHealth ID (for adults)
Standards in Waiting
Diagnosis related groupsSNOMED for clinical vocabularyopenEHR and/or HL7SNOMED-to-ICD crosswalk
Major Objectives of StandardsConsistently record data about patients (health ID)Ease of transacting with PhilHealth (electronic claims)Consistent statistics across agencies
Challenges
High cost of electronic systems limit adoption among providersLack of standards contribute to higher costsLack of standards introduce "non-interoperable" components into the larger system
Priorities
Define a simple health data dictionary for electronic claimsBuild capability of providers to file claims electronicallyCreate business value for information use - utilization review (for payor)- cost effectiveness (for provider)
2
Next Steps
Define an enterprise architecture to guide transition from old to newDefine standards (identifiers, health data dictionary, schema for electronic claims)Information use (utilization review, quality assurance)
Agenda
24 January 2012
JLN Information Technology Track: Developing Functional Requirements For National Health Insurance Information Systems
Progress to date
Why we think requirements matter?
Where do functional requirements fit?
Enterprise ArchitectureHow everything fits together across the health finance system
TechnicalArchitecture
Information ArchitectureData
Applications
How information systems support the objectives of the health finance system
How the technology fits together and supports the health finance system
Infrastructure ArchitecturePhones & Computers
Networks & Communications
BusinessArchitecture
Vision, Principles, Policy
Functional Requirements
How the health finance system is structured & works to meet its objectives
What benefit do global requirements offer countries?
Global CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
Global Common Solutions
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
First Phase of IT Project Focused
Here
JLN Members Focus Here
India AarogyasriIndia Aarogyasri24x7 integrated call center24x7 integrated call center
India RSBY India RSBY Biometric ID smart cardsBiometric ID smart cards
NigeriaNigeriaVoluntary contributors SW ProgramVoluntary contributors SW Program
ThailandThailandNational ID smart cardsNational ID smart cards
Isn’t the Future Mobile Phones & Smart Cards?
Page 43
What may be common in insurance?
What may not be common?
CRDM – Building functional common requirements together
What are the steps in CRDM?
1. Domain – set of functions and processes that define the work of a specific area of the larger health system, i.e. health financing
2. Process Framework – set of processes that define the boundaries of a domain and the relationships between them and other systems and domains.
3. Business Process – A set of activities and tasks that logically group together to accomplish a goal or produce something of value for the benefit of the organization, stakeholder, or customer
4. Activity/Task Model – visual representation of a business process in terms of tasks, sets of tasks and decision points in a logical workflow used to enhance communication and collaboration among users, stakeholders, and engineers
5. Requirement – a statement that describes what an information system must do to support a task, activity or decision. These are non-technology statements that usually begin with “the system must or shall…”
What is the process framework?
Scheme PolicyBenefit Package
FormularyProvider Rates
Eligibility RequirementsProvider Policy Setting
Premium Setting Fundamental System
“Factory” 1.Beneficiary Management
2.Provider Management3.Premium Collection4.Claims Management
5.Accounting
Rules
Data Provides Policy Guidance
Analyzing Performance
6.Care Management7.Utilization Management
8.Provider Quality Management
Fiduciary Fund Management
9.Actuarial Management10. Medical Loss11. Audit/Fraud
Data &
Feedback
Change Mgmt
National policy regarding
target population set
by country
National policy regarding
target population set
by country
What are the steps in CRDM?
1. Domain – set of functions and processes that define the work of a specific area of the larger health system, i.e. health financing
2. Process Framework – set of processes that define the boundaries of a domain and the relationships between them and other systems and domains.
3. Business Process – A set of activities and tasks that logically group together to accomplish a goal or produce something of value for the benefit of the organization, stakeholder, or customer
4. Activity/Task Model – visual representation of a business process in terms of tasks, sets of tasks and decision points in a logical workflow used to enhance communication and collaboration among users, stakeholders, and engineers
5. Requirement – a statement that describes what an information system must do to support a task, activity or decision. These are non-technology statements that usually begin with “the system must or shall…”
What is the business process matrix?
REFERENCE NUMBER
PROCESS GROUP
PROCESS OBJECTIVE(S) INPUTS OUTPUTS TASK SETS MEASUREABLE
OUTCOMES 2.1 Beneficiary
Management
Enroll beneficiary or insured
Verify identity and eligibility in a timely manner of persons seeking access to benefits plan services
Demographics Financial information Geographic information Qualifying criteria (see
qualifying conditions) Proof of identity (e.g.,
national identification card, personal identification number, biometrics information, photo)
Medical history Current medical condition
Time-based eligibility determination
Insured identifier Benefits plan number Benefits class Benefits plan detail Proof of coverage Feed into data repository
Validate identity documents
Record information in data repository
Eligibility is determined as approved or rejected
Approved person receives proof of coverage (e.g., identification card)
Assign benefits class Benefits plan Accurate list of
insured
Illustration of all possible inputs, outputs and tasks a system may need to perform for consideration purposes
What are the steps in CRDM?
1. Domain – set of functions and processes that define the work of a specific area of the larger health system, i.e. health financing
2. Process Framework – set of processes that define the boundaries of a domain and the relationships between them and other systems and domains.
3. Business Process – A set of activities and tasks that logically group together to accomplish a goal or produce something of value for the benefit of the organization, stakeholder, or customer
4. Activity/Task Model – visual representation of a business process in terms of tasks, sets of tasks and decision points in a logical workflow used to enhance communication and collaboration among users, stakeholders, and engineers
5. Requirement – a statement that describes what an information system must do to support a task, activity or decision. These are non-technology statements that usually begin with “the system must or shall…”
What is common task flow?
What are the steps in CRDM?
1. Domain – set of functions and processes that define the work of a specific area of the larger health system, i.e. health financing
2. Process Framework – set of processes that define the boundaries of a domain and the relationships between them and other systems and domains.
3. Business Process – A set of activities and tasks that logically group together to accomplish a goal or produce something of value for the benefit of the organization, stakeholder, or customer
4. Activity/Task Model – visual representation of a business process in terms of tasks, sets of tasks and decision points in a logical workflow used to enhance communication and collaboration among users, stakeholders, and engineers
5. Requirement – a statement that describes what an information system must do to support a task, activity or decision. These are non-technology statements that usually begin with “the system must or shall…”
What is a draft requirement catalog?
ID BUSINESS PROCESS
ACTIVITY REQUIREMENT (The system must or should…)
1 ELIGIBILITY Search for insurance detail with alternate ID
allow provider to search for beneficiary's insurance detail with alternate identifier (i.e. name, DOB…..)
2 ELIGIBILITY Search for insurance detail with alternate ID
allow provider to visibly see prompt for alternate identification method if ID presented is not valid
3 ELIGIBILITY Capture insurance detail allow provider to enter identification detail
4 ELIGIBILITY Capture insurance detail allow provider to enter proof of insurance detail
5 ELIGIBILITY Capture insurance detail allow provider to enter biometric detail
6 ELIGIBILITY Capture insurance detail allow provider to capture referral details
7 ELIGIBILITY Validate Insurance allow provider to validate identification
8 ELIGIBILITY Validate Insurance allow provider to authenticate biometric detail
9 ELIGIBILITY Validate Insurance allow provider to visibly see benefits plan assigned to the beneficiary
10 ELIGIBILITY Validate Insurance allow provider to visibly see beneficiary eligibility status
11 ELIGIBILITY Validate Insurance allow provider to clearly see the beneficiary's benefits plan details
12 ELIGIBILITY Validate Insuranceallow provider to visibly see enrollee benefit plan statistical data (i.e. amount of money remaining…….)
Future plan requested by Core Work Group
Shared CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Shared Common Solutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Focus on new requirements,HDD
tools, & policy/tech
evidence
Informed by JLN member
deployments
Support national HDD and
requirements efforts
Compare solutions against
requirements
How do we plan the future together? Questions to consider
What tools – (these or others?) would be the most useful products that could emerge from the JLN
How could your country contribute to the development of these tools ( i.e. prototype, pilot, design, etc.)
If you want to go fast, go alone.If you want to go far, go together.
African Proverb
“What if we go together?”
Agenda
Agenda
Agenda
Thank youขอบคุ�ณAsante
Merci
لك شكرا
Thank You
Gracias
謝謝您
Shukran
Danke
Grazie
Cảm ơn bạn
Dank je
What happens in 2012/2013 determined by JLN?
Shared CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Shared Common Solutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Finalize draft requirements and do new processes
Support JLN member
deployments
Take global requirements and apply in some JLN
countries
Compare solutions against
requirements
Agenda
Agenda
Agenda
Thank youขอบคุ�ณAsante
Merci
لك شكرا
Thank You
Gracias
謝謝您
Shukran
Danke
Grazie
Cảm ơn bạn
Dank je
24 January 2012
JLN Joint Session of the Information Technology & Quality Tracks
A Systematic Architected and Rational Approach for Understanding and Improving Quality
Capability Maturity Model
Typically undocumented and in a state of dynamic change, tending to be driven in an ad hoc, uncontrolled and reactive manner by users or events. This provides a chaotic or unstable environment for the processes.
Level 1Initial
(Chaotic)
Some processes are repeatable, possibly with consistent results. Process discipline is unlikely to be rigorous, but where it exists it may help to ensure that existing processes are maintained during times of stress.
Level 2Repeatable
Sets of defined and documented standard processes established and subject to some degree of improvement over time. These standard processes are in place (i.e., they are the AS-IS processes) and used to establish consistency of process performance across the organization.
Level 3Defined
Using process metrics, management can effectively control the AS-IS process. Management can identify ways to adjust and adapt the process to particular projects without measurable losses of quality or deviations from specifications. Process Capability is established from this level.
Level 4Managed
The focus is on continually improving process performance through both incremental and innovative technological changes/improvements towards clear TO-BE targets.
Level 5Optimizing
1st
Country 2nd
Multi-Country Solution
Collaborative
The Cost Effectiveness of Common Requirements, Standards and Solutions
Cost
Time
Multi-Country Requirements & StandardsCollaborative
1st
Country 2nd
Shared Common Architecture Tools
Shared CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Shared Common Solutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Boneyard
Developing Scalable Solutions
Page 77
*”CFS2” conditions for sustainability and scalability, “SDLC” software development life cycle, “OS” operating systems, “TCO” total cost of ownership.
Deploy Develop Design
ContextProblemsUsersProcessesRequirementsCFS2*
SpecificationsData ModelUser InterfaceDevice TypesInterfacesStandards
SDLC*Dev ToolsData baseOS*NetworkRoad Map
User TrainingMigration PlanInfrastructureTCO*/BudgetSupport StaffMaintenance
1 2 3 4
Analysis
Most people start hereNeed a bit more focus here
What is the benefit of shared common functional requirements?
Shared CommonArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Country SpecificArchitecture
•Requirements
•Standards
•Guidelines
•etc.
Shared Common Solutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
Country SpecificSolutions
•Software
•Hardware
•Services
•etc.
First Phase of IT Project Focused
Here
JLN Members Focus Here
What have we done?
Introduce project and hold initial
workshop in Bangkok
Develop process framework with experts;
Build draft process matrix; Draft country level task
flows
Country consultationsThailand May 3-13
India (RSBY) – Jul 13-15India (Aarogyasri) – Jul 18-20
Draft first set of common task flows and requirements for
core work group
Develop health data dictionary paper series
and tool
Requirements Development Work
JLN Information Technology Track Work
Convene core work group with JLN members to review task
flows and agree on global requirements;
Finalize and share requirements.
Develop future plan for IT track based on country feedback
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Host online survey; Interview JLN country
respondents; Conduct stakeholder
mapping