johnson matthey - kevin mowbray.pdf

37
7/13/2019 Johnson Matthey - Kevin Mowbray.pdf http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/johnson-matthey-kevin-mowbraypdf 1/37  Experience in optimizing ATR performance with high stability KATALCO JM  catalysts Kevin Mowbray Johnson Matthey

Upload: manish-abraham

Post on 03-Nov-2015

240 views

Category:

Documents


20 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Experience in optimizing ATR performance

    with high stability KATALCOJM catalysts

    Kevin Mowbray

    Johnson Matthey

  • Introduction

    Introduction to autothermal reforming

    Catalyst bed fouling and pressure drop build up

    Alumina vaporization and transport

    High stability reforming catalysts and target tiles

    Case study large combined reforming plant

    Conclusions

  • Autothermal reforming

    Increasingly common in methanol plants

    Beneficial in larger plants

    Alternative feeds such as coke oven gas

    Brings several benefits

    Low methane slip due to high temperature

    Stoichiometric synthesis gas

    Improve loop efficiency

    Can be employed in several flow schemes

    Johnson Matthey have experience designing for all cases

    Johnson Matthey have experience with alternative feeds

  • Series & combined reforming

    Steam

    Steam

    Steam

    Steam

    reformer

    Oxygen

    Natural gas

    Autothermal

    reformer

    Bypass gas

  • EMethanex example

    3,600mtpd methanol plant

    Damietta, Egypt

    Combined reforming flow scheme

    DPT / Johnson Matthey technology

    Johnson Matthey largest autothermal reformer to date

    Commissioned Q1 2011

    ATR running well

  • Autothermal reformer

    Alumina lumps or target tiles

    Catalyst bed

    Refractory

    support arch

    Alumina lumps

    Reformed gas outlet

    9501020C

    Refractory lining

    Oxygen inlet

    20250C

    Process gas inlet

    650750C Burner

    ~1250C

  • Standard catalyst charge

    Alumina hold-down lumps or tiles

    Guard layer of low activity large pellets

    Alumina condenses on large pellets

    Minimizes pressure drop build-up

    Main bed of standard catalyst

    The hold-down material vaporizes

    More important than refractory vaporization

  • Standard catalyst charge

    Alumina lumps or target tiles

    Standard catalyst

    Alumina lumps

    Low activity catalyst

    Severely fouled

    catalyst forms

    in this location

  • Target tiles

  • Vaporized tiles and large catalyst

  • Fouling on main catalyst

  • Severe fouling of main bed

  • Rubies

  • Alumina vaporization

  • Effect of condensation

    Fouls and blocks the flow paths

    Increased pressure drop Reduced rate as reformed gas pressure reduces

    Mini shutdowns to skim catalyst bed

    Short catalyst lifetime

    Loss in activity by physical blinding

    Difficulty in discharging catalyst

    Fouling of waste heat boiler

    Often find rubies Al2O3 contaminated with traces of Cr

  • High stability catalyst charge

    Hold down tiles or lumps (KATALCOJM 94-1)

    high density stabilized ceramic

    reduces vaporization from tiles by >90%

    guard bed of high activity (KATALCOJM 89-6Q)

    refractory metal on a stabilized ceramic

    cools gas rapidly below vaporization temperature

    main bed of KATALCOJM 28-4Q

    reduces vaporization and pressure drop

  • KATALCOJM 94-1 and 89-6EQ

  • Case study

    Large combined reforming based methanol plant

    1997 2007 ran with alumina based catalysts in ATR

    Experienced pressure drop build-up

    Bed needed skimming at each maintenance turn around

    Installed JM high stability catalysts in 2007

    Very low rate of pressure drop rise

    Catalysts removed and reloaded due to refractory repair in 2010

    Operated through till a planned changed out on 2014

  • KATALCOJM 89-6 charge in July 2007

    KATALCOJM 94-1 tiles

    KATALCOJM 28-4Q catalyst

    KATALCOJM 94-1 lumps

    KATALCOJM 89-6GQ catalyst

  • KATALCOJM 89-6 charge in July 2007

  • Pressure drop 0 3 years

  • Overhaul July 2010

    Internal inspection in September 2009 identified problems with the refractory lining

    Major repairs planned for July 2010

    3 years after KATALCOJM 94-1 and 89-6 was installed

    Pressure drop had built up by only a small amount

    Tiles and catalyst in as new condition during inspection

    Decision made to remove the catalyst and recharge

    Some spare catalyst ordered to make up for breakage

  • KATALCOJM 94-1 tiles

  • KATALCOJM 94-1 lumps

  • KATALCOJM 89-6GQ catalyst

  • KATALCOJM 28-4Q catalyst - top

  • Findings after 3 years service

    KATALCOJM 94-1 tiles and lumps in excellent condition

    Small number of tiles with some cracks but reusable

    Carefully removed and reused

    KATALCOJM 89-6GQ catalyst in excellent condition

    Small number of broken pellets but OK for reuse

    There was no alumina condensed on the 89-6GQ

    This remained in as new condition

    KATALCOJM 28-4Q catalyst in good condition

    Very top of bed slightly fouled with alumina

    Replaced with KATALCOJM 28-4EQ catalyst Larger holes so less easy to foul in the future

    Rest of bed in excellent condition and reused

  • KATALCOJM 89-6 charge in July 2010

    KATALCOJM 94-1 tiles

    KATALCOJM 28-4Q catalyst

    KATALCOJM 94-1 lumps

    KATALCOJM 89-6GQ catalyst

    KATALCOJM 28-4EQ catalyst

  • Pressure drop 0 6 years

  • Findings after 6 years service

    KATALCOJM 94-1 tiles and lumps in excellent condition

    Minor spalling, no evaporation, no discolouring

    Described as good as new

    KATALCOJM 89-6GQ catalyst in excellent condition

    No sign of vaporization

    No ruby formation

    Some pellet breakage observed

    KATALCOJM 28-4Q catalyst

    Only very top of bed inspected

    Vaporization of pellets seen in mixed layer of KATALCOJM 89-6GQ and KATALCOJM 28-4Q from 2010 reload

  • ATR inspection June 2013

    KATALCOJM 94-1 Tiles

    Top of bed

  • ATR inspection June 2013

    KATALCOJM 89-6GQ and KATALCOJM 94-1 lumps

  • Operation through till end of run

  • Findings after 7 years service

    KATALCOJM 94-1 tiles and lumps in excellent condition

    Minor spalling, no evaporation, no discolouring

  • Findings after 7 years service

    KATALCOJM 89-6GQ catalyst in excellent condition

    No sign of vaporization

    No ruby formation

    Some pellet breakage observed

  • Findings after 7 years service

    KATALCOJM 28-4Q catalyst

    Vaporization of pellets seen in mixed layer of KATALCOJM 89-6GQ and KATALCOJM 28-4Q from

    2010 reload

    alumina based supports are not as thermally stable as high density stabilized ceramics

  • Conclusions

    Johnson Matthey have extensive experience in the technology of autothermal reforming

    Johnson Matthey have demonstrated a range of superior target tiles and catalysts for autothermal reformers

    These catalysts operated successfully with less pressure drop build-up for 7 years in a large combined reforming

    methanol plant

    Johnson Matthey catalysts and inert materials loaded again in 2014.