1

Col Mark D. LaViolette, USMCCapabilities and Acquisition Division (CAD)

Joint Staff, J‐8

Joint Capabilities Development and  Acquisition

2010 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition

“Dual Use Combat Developers Panel”

2

Bottom Line Up FrontBottom Line Up Front (BLUF)(BLUF)

•

Balancing Act: –

Requirements, Resources, Acquisition

•

Big “A” vs. Little “A”–

Standard acquisition process slow but effective

–

Rapid Acquisition (e.g, JUONS) when appropriate–

Other avenues: JCTD

•

Resource Constrained Environment

3

Joint Staff J8 MissionJoint Staff J8 Mission

Assist in Delivering the Assist in Delivering the Right Mix of CapabilitiesRight Mix of Capabilitiesfor the Joint Force Commandersfor the Joint Force Commanders

RESOURCE

ALLOCATION

REQUIREMENTS

DETERMINATIONACQUISITION

• Requirement Determination ‐

Planning, studies, analysis, assessments• Resource Allocation ‐

Programming/Budgeting • Acquisition Execution ‐

Deliver the required capabilities

4

Challenge of Rapid AcquisitionChallenge of Rapid Acquisition

Future FocusedVery Structured ProcessEvolved RequirementsAnalysis of AlternativesLengthy DevelopmentHigh Visibility on ProgramLarge Investment

little little

Now focused

More ad hoc process

Broad requirement

Quick assessment of alternatives

Limited development

High visibility on results

Limited investment

Very Limited Feedback

Transition to Program of Record

5

JUON RobotsJUON Robots

•

10 Total CENTCOM JUONs–

C-IED related–

3 Active / 7 Fielded –

Additional robots included in surge requirements

•

Enhancements: –

Deployment systems from vehicles–

Detachable toolkits–

Long-range antennas–

Video capture

Talon RobotTalon Robot PackBotPackBotMARCBOTMARCBOT Devil Pup (SUGV 3000)Devil Pup (SUGV 3000)

6

New & Accelerated JCTD Process New & Accelerated JCTD Process

Selection Execution

Joint Capability Technology DemonstrationsJoint Capability Technology Demonstrations

(JCTD) (JCTD)  Quarterly Starts / Transfer to POR as appropriateQuarterly Starts / Transfer to POR as appropriate

Quarterly ProgramReview Boards

Legacy Selection Process(includes JROC validation)

Legacy Execution Process

Start

Start

6 MOS 12 MOS 18 MOS 24 MOS

JROC

Selection Execution

Selection Execution

Start

Start

JROC

JROC

Candidate Decision Board• Executable (Tech Readiness Lvl

(TRL) 5-7)• Addresses valid need• OSD / DDR&E Chair• JS / J8 DDR –

CO-Chair

Program Review Board:• Transfer to Program Of Record (POR); or• Deliver residuals satisfying need; or• Terminate• Forward to JROC for validation

CUGVCUGVJCTD JCTD SuccessSuccess

7

297 328 365 377 400 411 432 480 513 531

72 91 79124

169187 149 128 50 50 50 50

589575561551542

?

1917

?

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fiscal Year

TY $

in B

Base OCO Supplem ental

316345

437468 479

535

601

667 662659+

601 611 625

542+Projection*Projection*

639

Note:*FY10 OMB Budget Blueprint

297 328 365 377 400 411 432 480 513 531

72 91 79124

169187 149 128 50 50 50 50

589575561551542

?

1917

?

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fiscal Year

TY $

in B

Base OCO Supplem ental

316345

437468 479

535

601

667 662659+

601 611 625

542+Projection*Projection*

639

Note:*FY10 OMB Budget Blueprint

Defense Funding

Federal Spending

M andatory

Net Interest

Non-Defense Discretionary

National Defense

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

Fiscal Year

Perc

enta

ge o

f the

Fed

eral

Bud

get

PROJECTION

FY 1964

21%

6%

22%

51%

FY 2004

19%

55%

7%

19%

FY 2014

15%

58%

12%

15%

M andatory

Net Interest

Non-Defense Discretionary

National Defense

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

Fiscal Year

Perc

enta

ge o

f the

Fed

eral

Bud

get

PROJECTION

FY 1964

21%

6%

22%

51%

FY 2004

19%

55%

7%

19%

FY 2014

15%

58%

12%

15%

Federal Deficit/Surplus

Defense as a Percentage of GDP

Downward Budget PressuresDownward Budget Pressures

Mounting deficits, interest payments & entitlement spending will result in downward pressure to defense budgets 

Mandatory

Net Interest

Non-Defense Discretionary

National Defense

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

2013

Fiscal Year

Fede

ral B

udge

t Per

cent

age

ProjectionMandatory

Net Interest

Non-Defense Discretionary

National Defense

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1980

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

2013

Fiscal Year

Fede

ral B

udge

t Per

cent

age

Projection

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

2019

Surp

lus

/ Def

icit

as %

of G

DP

ProjectionProjection

40-year average(1969-2009):

-2.6%

FY08 – $459BFY09 – $1552BFY10 – $1449BFY11 – $1173BFY12 – $939B

Federal Surplus / Deficit

-1,600

-1,400

-1,200

-1,000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

1940

1942

1944

1946

1948

1950

1952

1954

1956

1958

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

TY $

in B

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

2019

Surp

lus

/ Def

icit

as %

of G

DP

ProjectionProjection

40-year average(1969-2009):

-2.6%

40-year average(1969-2009):

-2.6%

40-year average(1969-2009):

-2.6%

FY08 – $459BFY09 – $1552BFY10 – $1449BFY11 – $1173BFY12 – $939B

Federal Surplus / Deficit

-1,600

-1,400

-1,200

-1,000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

1940

1942

1944

1946

1948

1950

1952

1954

1956

1958

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

TY $

in B

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

VIETNAM (1968)8.9%

KOREA (1953)11.7%

GULF WAR (1991)4.4%

WWII (1945)34.5%

REAGAN BUILD UP (1986)6.0%

GDP (CY00 $B)% of GDP

FY10*4.8%

(CY00 $B)

Projections:FY10-19 GDP and DoD % based on OMB and CBO projections

Key Summary• FY10 (3.7% Base & 4.8%

including OCO / Supp):─ GDP: $14,439B (CBO est.)─ Base: $531B─ OCO / Supp: $161B

FY15**3.7%

ProjectionProjection

Notes:*FY10 DoD funding includes $161B for OCO & Supplemental**FY12-15 DoD funding includes $50B/year for OCO

OMB

CBO

(% of GDP)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

VIETNAM (1968)8.9%

KOREA (1953)11.7%

GULF WAR (1991)4.4%

WWII (1945)34.5%

REAGAN BUILD UP (1986)6.0%

GDP (CY00 $B)% of GDP

FY10*4.8%

(CY00 $B)

Projections:FY10-19 GDP and DoD % based on OMB and CBO projections

Key Summary• FY10 (3.7% Base & 4.8%

including OCO / Supp):─ GDP: $14,439B (CBO est.)─ Base: $531B─ OCO / Supp: $161B

FY15**3.7%

ProjectionProjection

Notes:*FY10 DoD funding includes $161B for OCO & Supplemental**FY12-15 DoD funding includes $50B/year for OCO

OMB

CBO

(% of GDP)

8

•

J‐8 committed to fielding right mix of Joint capabilities

•

Use rapid acquisition process when appropriate

•

Balancing priorities is critical 

ConclusionConclusion

RESOURCE

ALLOCATION

REQUIREMENTS

DETERMINATIONACQUISITION

9

10

BACKUP SLIDESBACKUP SLIDES

11

JROCApprove

JIC JIC

CBACBA PlanICD

Capability Gap Validation

Technical Approach

Refine & Produce System

JCBReview JCB

Approval

JROCApprove

ICD

ChangeDOTmLPF

RiskOK

GapValidated

DCR

Done

Additional Analysis

JROCApproval

CDD

KPPs

KSAs

CostSchedule

Risk

Affordability

CPDCDD

ProductionWeaponSystem

Performance

Engineering & Manufacturing Dev Produce & DeployMilestoneMilestone

BBMilestoneMilestone

CC

JCBReview

JCBReview

MilestoneMilestoneAA

TechnologyDevelopment

LRIP FRP

OSDServicesDecision MeetingsJS/COCOMS

CBA

ICD

MDD

Mat’l

SolutionAnalysis

Capability Based Assessment and Acquisition ProcessesCapability Based Assessment and Acquisition Processes

12

Rapid Fielding FrameworkRapid Fielding Framework

GENERATIONPHASE

VETTINGPHASE

EQUIPPINGPHASE

OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT PHASE

Force Commander Identifies Urgent Need

Combatant Staff determines themost suitable process

COCOM CoS certifies and submitsto Joint Staff (DJ-8 RMD)

J-8 RMD Receives and verifies that JUON meets submission criteria

JUON is reviewed and routed

Solutions are identified

JRAC determines a resourcing Strategy.

Interim Sponsor creates a Simplified Acquisition Plan

Procures and deliver solutionto the Warfighter

Provide Progress Reports On Performance, Cost, and Schedule

Interim Sponsor sustains solutionand monitors performance fortwenty- four months

Interim Sponsor, COCOM, andFCB prepare Capability Review to Address final disposition of fieldedsystem.

SPEED IS LIFE

JUON Process Consists of Four Phases:

13

•

JCTD Historical PerspectiveAll JCTDs: 2006 – Present, DDR&E Funding

6 Mos

$10M

$20M

$30M

$40M

42 Mos30 Mos12 Mos 18 Mos 24 Mos 36 Mos 48 Mos

Legacy JCTD ProcessFY10 Interim JCTD ProcessFY11+ New JCTD Process

APP

AD

AS

PHPG

JFPA

SS

TISC

CA

BLE

JMEW

S

CH

AMP

CH

AMPI

ON

Med

usa

JSuW

CO

RPO

RA

L

PGSS

JRaD

S

CSE

JMD

SE

FITE

OB

1N

ZP

AW

SSC

AMS

PAW

SR

IOH

TVSF

Com

mon

Gro

und

MA

DSS

C2

Gap

Fill

er

Cla

ssifi

ed

SFO

B

DW

NSL

DSS

CD

-CIE

R2T

DFW

APK

WS

TED

SSe

a Tr

acke

rOP3

D

PEO

PLE

ISO

MPEA

K

IRIS

GO

Pre-FY10 JCTD

FY10 JCTD

FY11+ JCTD