joint concept development and experimentation (jcd&e)
DESCRIPTION
Information Sharing Challenges “….following the attacks on the NY World Trade Center towers, engineers knew 15 to 20 minutes beforehand that the towers would collapse, but couldn’t notify on-scene personnel…..Defense personnel, first responders, police, firefighters, rescue workers do not have the ability to communicate and share information…. This is true then and now...Benjamin Riley, ADSECDEF “…Existing DoD guidance on establishing information sharing agreements with Federal, state local authorities does not mandate action or clear standards….such agreements need to include allied, partner agencies and other critical mission partners, with clearly established standards regarding scope and timeliness of formal information sharing….OSD, Final Report Aug 18, 2010 on Information Sharing Efforts Outside DoDTRANSCRIPT
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 1
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
United States Joint Forces CommandUnited States Joint Forces CommandJoint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E)Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E)
Interagency and Multinational Information Sharing Architecture and Solutions (IMISAS)
Scene SetterScene Setter7 December 2010
Mr. Phil KearleyBuilding Partnership Division Lead
Joint Concept Development & ExperimentationUSJFCOM, J9
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 2
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
Information Sharing Challenges
“….following the attacks on the NY World Trade Center towers, engineers knew 15 to 20 minutes beforehand that the towers would collapse, but couldn’t notify on-scene personnel…..Defense personnel, first responders, police, firefighters, rescue workers do not have the ability to communicate and share information…. This is true then and now...Benjamin Riley, ADSECDEF
“…Existing DoD guidance on establishing information sharing agreements with Federal, state local authorities does not mandate action or clear standards….such agreements need to include allied, partner agencies and other critical mission partners, with clearly established standards regarding scope and timeliness of formal information sharing….OSD, Final Report Aug 18, 2010 on Information Sharing Efforts Outside DoD
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 3
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
Information Sharing ChallengesLessons Learned from the Haiti Relief Efforts:
“ In Humanitarian Relief and Disaster Relief efforts, we need to provide critical data and information sharable with the host government, civil society and affected populations (in local languages) in order to strengthen host country capacities, leverage local expertise, gain their input, involve them in coordination and empower them.
“With so much information coming in from different sources, it is critical that this data includes essential meta-data (source, date-stamp, geo-reference) and adheres to the Principles of Humanitarian Information Management, i.e. accessibility, accountability, impartiality, inclusiveness, interoperability, relevance, sensitivity, sustainability, timeliness and verifiability…”
“Simply making enormous amounts of data and information available and introducing new technologies is not enough to ensure efficient coordination and effective decision-making. Strong management, proper resourcing, advanced training and recognized standards and policies are necessary to take full advantage of data and information for strategic analysis and operational applications.”
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 4
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
Future Comprehensive Civil-Military Interaction (FCCMI) Concept
Sorry can’t because…
Challenges to Interaction
Classification “Need to Know”
Culture
Infrastructure Trust
TrainingInfrastructureTrustCulture
Training
?
Asymmetry
Asymmetry
Classification
Policy
ProcedureKnowledge
Management
Human Factors
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 5
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
IMISAS OverviewProblem StatementProblem StatementMilitary and civilian actors lack a coherent framework / capability to
information share and collaborate across multiple domains with other actors primarily due to a lack of procedures, business rules, restrictive policies and non-interoperable networks and systems
Workshop DescriptionWorkshop DescriptionIdentify information sharing gaps and issues and examine potential solutions
to be explored via experimentation
ObjectivesObjectives• Develop a community of interest
• Identify and validate challenges: information sharing business rules, policies and procedures, existing technology
• Compare existing architectures and discuss potential new architectureIMPACT: Improved information sharing can aid in increasing the effectiveness of a broad range of operations where military and civilian
actors are engaged by facilitating consultation and possible cooperation
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 6
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
IMISAS Review• Baseline Assessment
o Review, validate and add to baseline assessment
• Workshops – Solution Developmento Identify Elements of the solution
• Workshops – Findings Recapo Cultural/ Human Factorso Policy & Procedureso Technology
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 7
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
Questions?
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 8
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
Commercial Internet
ISPs All Internet
Users (Good & Bad guys)
NGOs & COI
“.mil” Information
Security Domain(s)
JWICSSIPRNetNIPRNet
Policy Lines
.gov
DoE, DoJ
UISUnclassified Info
Systems
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 9
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release
Top Secret Networks
~JWICS
Secret Networks
~SIPRNet
Non-Secure Networks
~NIPRNet
Alliance and Coalition Multiple ClassificationNetworks
UISUn-Class
Collaborative Information
Environment(s)
DoD Designed Environments~ Closed Architecture
Commercial Designed Environments
~ Open Architecture
Community of InterestInternet
NGOs
gw
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release 10
UNCLASSIFIED- Approved for Public Release