joint engineers conference making ethical decisions in engineering stephen smith, p.e....

17
Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting. com

Upload: myles-griffin

Post on 17-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Joint Engineers ConferenceMaking Ethical Decisions

in Engineering

Stephen Smith, [email protected]

Page 2: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethics = ??

• Do the right thing.• Do no harm.• Comply with the law.• Be honest.• Black and white vs. grey areas.• Does intent or result matter?

Page 3: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Engineers CreedAs a Professional Engineer, I dedicate my professional knowledge and skill to

the advancement and betterment of human welfare.• I pledge:

– To give the utmost of performance;– To participate in none but honest enterprise;– To live and work according to the laws of man and the highest

standards of professional conduct;– To place service before profit, the honor and standing of the

profession before personal advantage, and the public welfare above all other considerations.

• In humility and with need for Divine Guidance, I make this pledge.Adopted by National Society of Professional Engineers, June 1954

http://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/engineers-creed

Page 4: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers

Fundamental CanonsEngineers, in the fulfillment of their professional duties, shall:1. Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public.2. Perform services only in areas of their competence.3. Issue public statements only in an objective and truthful

manner.4. Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees.5. Avoid deceptive acts.6. Conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and

lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession.

http://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/Code-2007-July.pdf

Page 5: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethics and Human Nature

• Want to be ethical vs. be accepted• Want to please vs. bad news• Now vs. later• Not my problem• Effort vs. ease (lazy)• Profit (greedy)

Page 6: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethical Dilemmas

• Cost vs. safety– Busy traffic intersection in small city– Stop signs least cost, but more accidents likely– Traffic lights more costly, fewer accidents, more

delay– Roundabout most costly, least accidents and delay

• How does engineer decide?

Page 7: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethical Dilemmas

• Energy vs. climate– If you think human caused CO2 emissions are

damaging our climate,– Is it ethical to design a coal fired power plant?

Page 8: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethical Dilemmas

• Making the least bad choice…– Choose between fossil CO2 emissions vs.

windmills that kill raptors• Forced decisions with limited data…– Human behaviors– Earthquake loads– Climate change responses

Page 9: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethical Dilemmas

• Engineers and Politics– Data vs. belief– Obligation to be involved?– “The world is run by those who show up.”

Journal of Management in Engineering , July 1997, Vol. 13, No. 4 : pp. 61-66Leadership: The World Is Run by Those Who Show Up. Weingardt, R.(doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:4(61))

Page 10: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethical Dilemmas• When to blow the whistle?– Consider General Motors and their ignition switch

issues1. As a design engineer, if you know about the problem

and have reported it to your boss and nothing happens, what do you do?

2. As a supervisory engineer, you know about the problem and production manager says not a problem, what do you do?

3. Knowing that whistle blowing is likely professional suicide, when must you blow anyway?

Page 11: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Ethical (Non) Motivators

• VA Hospitals—Bonuses for short wait lists– Intent—Promptly schedule patients for care– Result—Secret lists not reflecting true wait times

• Others??

Page 12: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

How To Promote Ethical Behavior

• Recommendations from Morality Rebooted: Exploring simple Fixes to Our Moral Bugs, T. Zhang, F. Gino, & M Bazerman, April 21, 2014.– Download from website: http://

www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/14-105_67d79182-6bf2-404e-a049-6544c916fc8d.pdf

• Values and structures oriented approaches

Page 13: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Strategy for Ethical Behaviors

• Emphasize moral values– Values and mission statements– Ethical standards– Moral self concepts• We want to be good

– Ethical perceptions flexible• Reflect environment, peers, organization• Like “white lies”, unintended or little ethical lapses

accumulate, resulting in unethical behavior

Page 14: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Strategy for Ethical Behaviors

• Structural approaches– Audits• Increase likelihood of being caught• Give credibility to values

– Penalties• Impose consequences appropriate to acts• Give credibility to values

– Commitment before action• Face ethical issues before they are real. • Use SOPs, project planning, team approach

Page 15: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Strategy for Ethical Behaviors• Alignment of values with structure– Impossible goals (“Why try?”)

• No child left behind• 90% billable time

– Short term goal versus values• Profit versus reputation• Individual goal versus group values

– Discuss, emphasize, consistent, frequent, culture– Lead by example– Conflict between values and policies encourages

unethical behavior.

Page 16: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Resources• Online Ethics Center for Engineering and

Research at: http://www.onlineethics.org/• NSPE Ethics website: www.nspe.org/ethics/• YouTube Engineering Ethics—Many!!• Many more: google “engineering ethics”• And the final best resource—your family! Tell

spouse, parents, children about what you are doing and see how you and they feel.

Page 17: Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E. stephen@StephenSmithConsulting.com

Thank you.

Stephen Smith, P.E.Helena, MT

[email protected] (406)449-6216