joint meeting ediscovery joint session with the association of records managers and administrators,...
TRANSCRIPT
Joint MeetingeDiscovery Joint Sessionwith the Association of
Records Managers and Administrators, NYC Chapter (ARMA), Paralegals and Litigation
Support Working Group (PALS) and Women in eDiscovery (WIE)
Moderator: Joe Bartolo, J.D.
Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive
Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance
Panelist:Alan Winchester, Esq.
Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive
Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance
Panelist:Rudy Moliere
Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive
Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance
Panelist:Hon. Ronald J. Hedges
(retired)
Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive
Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance
Panelist:Salvatore Mancuso
Topic 1:
Predictive Coding (PC) as an emerging trend ("buzzword") - what's all the buzz about?
What is PC exactly, and how does it fit into TAR (Technology Assisted Review) a/k/a CAR (Computer Assisted Review) - or does it?
WWW.EDRM.NET
Topic 2:
What are the benefits of using processes such as TAR/CAR or PC versus a traditional linear review?
Topic 3:What are some of the differences in
using TAR/CAR for various purposes:
(a) records management;
(b) investigations and early case assessment; and
(c) Litigation (civil or criminal).
Is there is downstream use for PC for Information Governance Purposes? (Predictive Filing?)
WWW.EDRM.NET
WWW.EDRM.NET
Topic 4:Have paralegals been placed on
remediation projects of large data sets, and can they see this as a tool?
If paralegals are in the position where they will be asked to interact with this technology, are TAR/CAR and PC white horses for potential challenges?
Topic 5:
•What is involved in the process of generating a random “Sample”?
•What are some best practices regarding “Sampling” of the “Active” and “Null” sets to validate the results of TAR and “Clustering”?
eDISCOVERY TEAM®
Topic 6:CAR/TAR (and PC) have not been
accepted in any litigation other than at a threshold level. Should there be "transparency?
What does that mean in actual litigation practice?
Topic 7:
How should attorneys defend the process of using TAR/CAR (and/or PC), if challenged?
Concluding Remarks
Questions & Answers
Thank You for AttendingSpecial thanks to
NYCPA;ARMA;Women in eDiscovery – New York Chapter;PALS;
Event Sponsors: Polygon and
Subject Matter Expert Panelists;All those who participated in planning;NBC Studios.