joint presentation by respective units in dgs agri, empl and regio ipa components iii, iv and v:...
TRANSCRIPT
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO
IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and
absorption of assistance
2Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
• IPA framework: Structures and programming for Components III, IV and V
• Essentials for the progress to be achieved• How to ensure a good absorption of funds• State of play in preparations for implementation
3Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
I. Transition Assistance and Institution Building
II. Cross-Border Cooperation
III. Regional Development
IV. Human Resources Development
V. Rural Development (IPARD)
Candidate and potential candidate countries
Only candidate countries
IPA framework
4Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Main IPA objectives
Progressive alignment with the standards and policies of the EU: Cohesion policy, Common Agricultural Policy
Prepare countries to implement and manage Community funds:• European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund,
European Social Fund
• European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
Strengthening public management capacities
IPA framework
5Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
IPA “side effect” - Strengthening public management capacities
Guiding countries in creating modern public management structures, based on the principles of good governance:
• Openness (transparency)
• Participation (partnership)
• Accountability
• Effectiveness
• Coherence
IPA framework
6Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Structures and authorities to be in place:
• National IPA Co-ordinator [NIPAC] (CI-V)
• Strategic co-ordinator (CIII-IV)
• Competent Accrediting Officer [CAO] (CI-V)
• National Authorising Officer [NAO] (CI-V)
• A National Fund [NF] (CI-V)
• An Operating Structure [OS] (for each Component/Programme)
• Audit Authority [AA] (CI-V)
• End recipients (CIII-V) – line ministry; water, rail or road company; regional waste operator; municipality; SME; farmer
IPA framework
Example - IPARD structures
F I N A L B E N E F I C I A R I E S Technical Bodies
IPARD Agency
Internal Audit Regional Offices
Delegated BodiesManaging Authority
National Authorising Officer
National Fund
IPARD Monitoring Committee
IPA Monitoring Committee
European CommissionCompetent Accrediting
OfficerNational IPA Coordinator
Audit Authority
reporting
audit, control
management and control system
(MCS)
7
Pre-accession Partnership (Political Framework)
National development plans and programmes
(national development priorities)
Multi-annual Indicative Planning Document(all IPA components)
Multi-annual Indicative Financial Framework
Strategic Coherence Framework(IPA Regional Development and Human Resources
Development components)
Multi-annual Operational Programmes
Example - Component III+IV Strategic Framework
Relevant Community policiesRelevant National Sectoral
Strategies
Community Strategic Guidelines for Cohesion
Multi-annual programmes should be established:
Receiving of a "Candidate Country" status
Adoption of Multi-annual Programmes
Main steps to implementation of IPA CIII-V
Framework (and Sectoral) Agreements
National accreditation of operating structures
Accreditation and conferral of management decision
Multi-annual Financing Agreement
Becoming a candidate country
1 2 3
16
Years
Months
34 66 9
Starting preparation
Conferral granted
Programme implementation starts
Preparation takes from 2 to 3.5 years
11Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
• IPA framework: Structures and programming for Components III, IV and V
• Essentials for the progress to be achieved• How to ensure a good absorption of funds• State of play in preparations for implementation
12Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Strategic aspects:
• Clear and shared political vision for the sectors concerned, reflecting consensus on where the country wants to be within a set time horizon
• Clear and approved strategy for getting there (environment; water sector; transport infrastructure; rural development)
• Identification of investments needed to implement the strategy
• Overall - ownership of programming, preparation and implementation by beneficiary country
Essentials for the progress
13Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Institutional aspects:
• Commitment by all at all time during planning and implementation
• Central coordination and leadership
• Institution building at central level (staffing, relevant competencies, training, internal procedures) and ownership in core and line ministries
• Partnership with relevant stakeholders: administration bodies, regions, municipalities, economic and social partners, NGOs
Essentials for the progress
14Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
In summary - …to make a good progress:
• National legal and institutional structures must be in place
• More importantly - political back-up and commitment
• Which leads to allocation of appropriate human and financial resources
Essentials for the progress
15Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
With the political backing and commitment:
• Strategic decisions on the programming would be taken more easily and effectively
• Sufficient resources would be allocated
• Countries would take less time to set-up the necessary legal and institutional framework for implementation of IPA CIII-V
• Hence, upon gaining a status of a Candidate Country would experience lesser delays in absorption of the funds
Essentials for the progress
16Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
• IPA framework: Structures and programming for Components III, IV and V
• Essentials for the progress to be achieved
• How to ensure a good absorption of funds
• State of play in preparations for implementation
17Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
• Well defined programmes, well functioning structures, trained staff in place
• Early start of project preparation
• Strong awareness of stakeholders and beneficiaries
• Availability of co-financing
Absorption of funds
18Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Strong awareness of stakeholders and beneficiaries:
• Early involvement of relevant stakeholders - raising their interest and keeping them informed from the very beginning
• Strong project preparation is essential - hands-on advice to the prospective beneficiaries from the early stages of preparation; on how to prepare projects; how to make projects which would be accepted!
Absorption of funds
19Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Availability of co-financing:
• Timely setting aside of financial resources in the budgets of public bodies
• Good credit system, loan accessibility. State guarantee fund?
• To involve the financial sector from early stages. Close interaction between the Government and a banking sector
Absorption of funds
20Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
• IPA framework: Structures and programming for Components III, IV and V
• Essentials for the progress to be achieved• How to ensure a good absorption of funds• State of play in preparations for implementation
State of play 2009 - Candidate Countries
V
IV
IIITR
V
IV
IIIMK
V
IV
IIIHR
AbsorptionFinancing Agreements
Conferral of Management
Programmes
22Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo (under UN Security Council Resolution 1244)
• Applications for EU accession received from Albania and Montenegro. Serbia – expected shortly
• “IPA kick-off meetings” held in BiH, Montenegro and Serbia
• Strategies and timeframes for preparation
• Institutional and management capacity building to start implementation of IPARD – IPA Component I
State of play
23Effective Support for Enlargement 19 October 2009, Brussels
Closing remarks
Involvement of donors in successful preparation and absorption of assistance for IPA Components III, IV and V:
• Facilitate programming?
• Institutional building?
• Capacity building of stakeholders and prospective beneficiaries?
• Developing credit systems?