joint research activity 1 2nd generation adaptive optics ... · final design review may, 2007 phase...

1st1st--2nd April ’04 GENT2nd April ’04 GENT OPTICONOPTICON--JRA1 KO N. JRA1 KO N. HubinHubin

Joint Research Activity 1Joint Research Activity 122ndnd generation Adaptive Optics for 8generation Adaptive Optics for 8--10 m 10 m

telescopestelescopes

N. N. HubinHubinEuropean Southern ObservatoryEuropean Southern Observatory

1st-2nd April ’04 GENT OPTICON-JRA1 KO N. Hubin Page 2

JRA1 CharterJRA1 Charter

DESIGN THE NEXT GENERATION OF ADAPTIVE DESIGN THE NEXT GENERATION OF ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS FOR THE CURRENT OPTICS SYSTEMS FOR THE CURRENT EUROPEAN TELESCOPE FACILITIESEUROPEAN TELESCOPE FACILITIES

DEVELOP THE KEY TECHNOLOGY ENABLING DEVELOP THE KEY TECHNOLOGY ENABLING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SYSTEMSTHE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE SYSTEMS


Future AO needs in the European Future AO needs in the European CommunityCommunity

AOAO--MCAO and XAO at the LBTMCAO and XAO at the LBT

AO and MCAO at the GTCAO and MCAO at the GTC

XAO with highXAO with high--contrast NIR instrumentcontrast NIR instrument VLT Planet FinderVLT Planet Finder

Low background XAO in MIRLow background XAO in MIR VISIR with VLT Adaptive M2VISIR with VLT Adaptive M2

Seeing reducer (6Seeing reducer (6--8’ FOV 8’ FOV –– NIR)NIR) HAWKHAWK--I with VLT Adaptive M2I with VLT Adaptive M2

Seeing reducer (1’ FOVSeeing reducer (1’ FOV––VisibleVisible--high SC)high SC) MUSE GLAO + multiMUSE GLAO + multi--laserslasers

Seeing reducer multiSeeing reducer multi--buttons (30’ patrol buttons (30’ patrol -- II--band)band) FALCONFALCON

“Significant” Strehl “Significant” Strehl --Sr(visSr(vis)=10%))=10%)-- in 5”in 5” MUSE GLAO + multiMUSE GLAO + multi--laserslasers

Large FOV medium Large FOV medium Sr(KSr(K)=60% )=60% MCAO Imager a la GeminiMCAO Imager a la Gemini


R&D for 2R&D for 2ndnd generation AOgeneration AOXAO GLAO MCAO

concept definitionPiezo DMPiezo DM41412 2 act.act.

JRA 2

QE: 90%

25625622 pixelspixels

0.5 -1.5 kfps

3-1e RON

WFS CCD

RTC Platform controlRTC Platform controlMCAO optimal controlMCAO optimal control

Front-EndAcquisition

CPU

CPU

CPU CPU

CCD Controller

192x192 active area

CPU

CPU

CPU CPU

CCD Controller

192x192 active area

CPU

CPU

CPU CPU

CCD Controller

192x192 active area

CPU

CPU

CPU CPU

CCD Controller

256x256 detector

192x192 active area

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

Tip/Tilt Sensor Deformable Mirror

100/1000 EthernetLCU

256x256 detector

256x256 detector

256x256 detector

VME64x

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

Reco

nstru

ctio

n

CPU

CPU

CPU

CPU

Con

trol

Statistics

1-2 KHz

~1300 act.

1.5kHz

VLT Deformable M2VLT Deformable M2

LETI-LAOG MOEM

800 µm pitch


WPsWPs description (1)description (1)

Design and prototype development of a Multiple FOV WFS for the LDesign and prototype development of a Multiple FOV WFS for the LBT BT telescopetelescope

MultiMulti--FOV WFS FOV WFS for LBTfor LBT

2.42.4

Design and prototype development of a multiDesign and prototype development of a multi--object WFS for the GTC object WFS for the GTC MCAO system (best effort)MCAO system (best effort)

MultiMulti--object object WFS for GTCWFS for GTC

2.32.3

Conceptual and preliminary design of a L/NGS MCAO system dedicatConceptual and preliminary design of a L/NGS MCAO system dedicated ed to large (1to large (1’’) FOV correction at short wavelength.) FOV correction at short wavelength.Feasibility and conceptual design of a very large FOV multiFeasibility and conceptual design of a very large FOV multi--WFS AO WFS AO system (FALCON)system (FALCON)

L/NGS MCAO L/NGS MCAO design for the design for the

VLTVLT

2.22.2

Feasibility studies and conceptual design for an Extreme AdaptivFeasibility studies and conceptual design for an Extreme Adaptive e Optics system dedicated to planet search science. Definition of Optics system dedicated to planet search science. Definition of the high the high level specification of all key components required for this systlevel specification of all key components required for this system and em and intended to be developed within this JRP (Deformable mirror, wavintended to be developed within this JRP (Deformable mirror, wavefront efront sensor, Real Time computer, control)sensor, Real Time computer, control)

XAO system XAO system conceptual conceptual

designdesign

2.12.1

This WP will concentrate mainly on the system study and design oThis WP will concentrate mainly on the system study and design of new f new AOAO--MCAO facilities for the current Infrastructures.MCAO facilities for the current Infrastructures.

System designSystem design22

This WP will mainly coordinate the JRA activities, prepare the kThis WP will mainly coordinate the JRA activities, prepare the key ey specifications for the other specifications for the other WPsWPs, organize study and design reviews, , organize study and design reviews, prepare the 18prepare the 18--months period reports and detailed work plans for the months period reports and detailed work plans for the OPTICON management.OPTICON management.

ManagementManagement11

DescriptionDescriptionTitleTitleWPWP



Design and demonstration prototype of a Design and demonstration prototype of a PiezoPiezo stack deformable mirror stack deformable mirror control electronic able to drive the DM in WP3.3 will be developcontrol electronic able to drive the DM in WP3.3 will be developed and ed and tested. The prototype will not necessarily control the 1000 actutested. The prototype will not necessarily control the 1000 actuators.ators.

PiezoPiezo DM DM control control

electronicselectronics

3.43.4

Design and prototype of a Design and prototype of a PiezoPiezo stack Deformable Mirror with >1000 stack Deformable Mirror with >1000 actuators will be developed and tested.actuators will be developed and tested.

HighHigh--density density piezopiezo-- stack stack

DMDM

3.33.3

A theoretical study and experimental demonstration of an optimalA theoretical study and experimental demonstration of an optimal MCAO MCAO control will be performed on the ESO MCAO demonstrator.control will be performed on the ESO MCAO demonstrator.

Optimal control Optimal control for MCAO for MCAO systemssystems

3.23.2

22ndnd generation of Real Time Computer (RTC) platform for XAO and generation of Real Time Computer (RTC) platform for XAO and MCAO systems. A new H&SW RTC architecture will be designed and MCAO systems. A new H&SW RTC architecture will be designed and prototyped. Performance according to WP 2.1 and 2.2 will be prototyped. Performance according to WP 2.1 and 2.2 will be demonstrateddemonstrated

22ndnd generation generation RTC platformRTC platform

3.13.1

This WP contains all R&D activities required to support the abovThis WP contains all R&D activities required to support the above AOe AO--MCAO systemsMCAO systems

Technology Technology R&DR&D

33DescriptionDescriptionTitleTitleWPWP



A Pyramid and Shack Hartmann high order wavefront sensors will bA Pyramid and Shack Hartmann high order wavefront sensors will be e developed and their performance compared on a dedicated test bendeveloped and their performance compared on a dedicated test benchch

High order High order WFS WFS

experimental experimental studystudy

3.83.8

2k act. & low order MDM R&D. A full design of a 2k act. and low 2k act. & low order MDM R&D. A full design of a 2k act. and low order order MDM will be performed and prototypes will be developed. CorrespoMDM will be performed and prototypes will be developed. Corresponding nding control electronics will be designed and prototyped. Testing of control electronics will be designed and prototyped. Testing of these these prototypes will be done on a best effort basis depending on remaprototypes will be done on a best effort basis depending on remaining ining funds for the test bench.funds for the test bench.

2k & low order 2k & low order MicroMicro--

deformable deformable mirrors R&Dmirrors R&D

3.73.7

Design, manufacturing and testing of a large (~1m) convex glass Design, manufacturing and testing of a large (~1m) convex glass shell shell for large deformable mirror will be performedfor large deformable mirror will be performed

Manufacturing Manufacturing of a large of a large

convex glass convex glass shellshell

3.63.6

Feasibility, conceptual and preliminary design of the VLT adaptiFeasibility, conceptual and preliminary design of the VLT adaptive ve secondary will be developed. Required subsecondary will be developed. Required sub--systems prototypes will be systems prototypes will be developed to overcome issues identified during the design phase.developed to overcome issues identified during the design phase.

VLT adaptive VLT adaptive secondary secondary

design studydesign study

3.53.5

DescriptionDescriptionTitleTitleWPWP


Interaction between Work packagesInteraction between Work packages

Planet FinderWP 2.1

ESO

1600 act. Piezo DM: WP 3.3-3.4RTC Platform R&D: WP 3.1

CCD R&D: JRA2 High Order WFS experiment: WP 3.8


VLT PLANET FINDER I: CHEOPSVLT PLANET FINDER I: CHEOPS

VLTNasmythPlatform

ZIMPOLPolarimeter

NIRIntegral

FieldSpectrogr.(R ~ 15)

FullSpectrum

TransmissionX-AO

~1600 Act.~ 2kHzSR~ 0.8 @ 1µm

2562 elementsR ~ 152k x 2k chip

simultaneouscharge shifting pol. switching@ ~ 1kHz

accuracy ~ 10-6

Courtesy MPIA


Nasmyth focus

Common Path

VisNIR

AO sensing

Visible Channel

Coronograph

NIR Imaging channel

Imaging Spectrograph

Courtesy LAOG

II


WP 2.1: Schedule and deliverablesWP 2.1: Schedule and deliverables

May, 2007May, 2007Final Design ReviewFinal Design Review

November, 2004November, 2004Phase A Conceptual design studyPhase A Conceptual design study

May , 2006May , 2006Preliminary design ReviewPreliminary design Review

May, 2005May, 2005Start of phase BStart of phase B

May, 2004May, 2004Mid Term Review: CCD, DM, RTC specsMid Term Review: CCD, DM, RTC specs

May, 2003May, 2003Feasibility KickFeasibility Kick--offoff

DateDateMilestonesMilestones


Interaction between Work packagesInteraction between Work packages

L/NGS MCAOWP 2.2 2.3 2.4

Optimal control MCAO: WP 3.2Adaptive secondary: WP 3.5-3.6

CCD R&D: JRA2 RTC Platform R&D: WP 3.1MOEMS R&D: WP 3.7

MAD


WP 2.2: MUSE Ground Layer AOWP 2.2: MUSE Ground Layer AO

MUSE Wide Field ModeMUSE Wide Field ModeEEx2 in 0.2”EEx2 in 0.2”

MUSE Narrow Field ModeMUSE Narrow Field ModeSr(R)~10%Sr(R)~10%

4 Sodium LGSsØ30”

Faint NIR TT-NGSScience

7.5”FOVScience1’ FOV

3’ FOV

4 Sodium LGSsØ140”

Faint vis. TT-NGS

Wavefront tomography using 4 sodium LGSsGround layer correction: one Deformable Mirror


WP 2.2: MUSE GROUND LAYER AOWP 2.2: MUSE GROUND LAYER AO

WFS Calibratio

n

2’ LGS Acquisition

Camera

On-axis IR NGS TT Sensor

Off-axis Vis NGS

TT Sensor

LGS FocusTrombone

VL

T A

DA

PTE

R

4 LGS Wavefront

sensors

VLT M1

M2 + DM

LGSs

Laser LaunchTelescopes

AO

RE

LA

Y O

PTIC

SMUSE

SPECTROGRAPH 3’ FOV

MUSE Calibration

1’ -7.5”FOV

MUSE + AO Calibration

PupilPupil

Field


WP2.2: MUSE GROUND LAYER AOWP2.2: MUSE GROUND LAYER AO

AO Structure 1

AO Structure 2

Adaptor-rotator

IR TT sensor

Calibration Unit


WP 2.2: ASSISTWP 2.2: ASSISTAAdaptive daptive SSecondary econdary SSimulator and imulator and IInstrument nstrument TTest bedest bed

Mimic spot elongation LGSElongatedLGS shape

Point likeNGS shapeSodium589 nmLGS wavelengthIR or VIS WFS0.45 – 2.5 µmNGS wavelength= MUSE to HAWK-I or KMOSFree within 1.5’- 4.5’LGS location= MUSE to HAWK-I or KMOSFree within 3’-8’NGS locationMedian seeing Paranal0.5-1”Seeing= f/# Nasmyth VLT focusf/15Output f-number>Temporal behaviour> 2 kHz (TBC)Operating frequencyOptionally 9’ x 9’ (TBD)3’ => 8’Field sizePattern equal to Adaptive Secondary~1300Number of act.MUSE 465-930, X-Shooter V+IR, HAWK-I0.45-2.5 µmWavelength Range

CommentOperating rangeRequirement


WP 2.2: ASSISTWP 2.2: ASSIST

Initial design based on MAD conceptInitial design based on MAD conceptVoiceVoice--coil actuated Deformable Mirrorcoil actuated Deformable MirrorInfluence functions of existing DSMInfluence functions of existing DSMDeveloped in Leiden AO Laboratory: LAOLABDeveloped in Leiden AO Laboratory: LAOLAB


WP 2.2 deliverablesWP 2.2 deliverables

To+9MUSE conceptual design study

To + 40MUSE-AO + DSM simulator FDR

To + 28MUSE-AO+ DSM simulator PDR

To + 16Trade-off review

To+10MUSE instrument KO

TimeMilestones


Mid-high-layer WFS

Ground layer WFS left

constant envelope collimator

Piston mirror

Fringe and flexure tracker

Dichroic wheel Science detector

F20 camera

WP2.3: LINC-NIRVANA

Ground layer WFS right


Pyramid sensoroptical co-adding 12 stars in GWS 8 stars in MHWS

2’

6’Mid and High Layer WFS 2’Ground Layer WFS 2’- 6’

WP 2.3: Multiple FOV WFS


GWS in detail

WP2.3: 6' FoV Ground Layer WFS

Star enlarger

GL WFS


2Q-04 3Q-04 4Q-04 1Q-05 2Q-05 3Q-05 4Q-05 1Q-06 2Q-06 3Q-06 4Q-06 1Q-07 2Q-07 3Q-07MfoV

Kick-offDesign phase

Design ReviewConstruction

Testing EuropeIntegration LBT

First LightSkytests

Final Report6 12 18 24 30 36

WP2.3: Deliverables/Schedule

• Design report: 07. 2004• First light on LBT: 01. 2007• Test Report: 10. 2007


WP 2.4: OBJECTIVESWP 2.4: OBJECTIVESIACIAC

Determine Determine whatwhat typetype ofof multimulti--objectobject wavefront wavefront sensor sensor willwill be be usedused in in thethe GTCAO dualGTCAO dual--conjugate conjugate modemode

Determine Determine viabilityviability ofof multimulti--objectobject curvaturecurvature sensingsensingcompare compare withwith ShackShack--HartmannHartmann//pyramidpyramid sensingsensing

DesignDesign a a laboratorylaboratory prototypeprototype, , togethertogether withwithmultimulti--layerlayer turbulenceturbulence simulatorsimulatorDevelopDevelop algorithmsalgorithms toto be be testedtested onon thethe prototypeprototype


WP 2.4: DEVELOPMENT PLANWP 2.4: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

2004 2005 2006 2007SpecificationViability studyViability study report (I&II)Conceptual designConceptual Design reportPrototype developmentLaboratory testsLaboratory tests report

1st1st--2nd April ’04 GENT2nd April ’04 GENT OPTICONOPTICON--JRA1 KO N. JRA1 KO N. HubinHubin

WP 3: Key Component R&DWP 3: Key Component R&D


WP 3.1: AO Real Time platformWP 3.1: AO Real Time platformESOESO

Inputs: the AOInputs: the AO--RTC Platform grows around real projectsRTC Platform grows around real projects

AO RTCPlatformAO RTCPlatform

HAWK-IHAWK-I

Planet FinderPlanet Finder MUSEMUSE

OWLOWL

Others?Others?


WP 3.1: Implementation strategyWP 3.1: Implementation strategyThe AO platform serves several projects but does not end with themThe AO platform serves several projects but does not end with thThe AO platform serves several projects but does not end with themem

HardwareSpecification

CoreLibraries

Real-TimeCommunication

UserInterface

WP2.1

WP2.2

MUSE

Planet Finder

HAWK-I

Input Output

Platform

Impl

emen

tatio

nPr

otot

ypes


WP 3.1: FPGA development for WP 3.1: FPGA development for RTC platformRTC platform

COTS FPGA PMC module

Contribution from Durham


WP 3.1: Schedule & deliverablesWP 3.1: Schedule & deliverables

Milestone19.07.04Final Design Report7M22.01.07AO-MCAO RTC Platform Final Design

3 M01.01.04Specification of the 2nd generation AO and MCAO RTC Platform

10 M05.04.04Conceptual Design Study & Procurement

Milestone21.01.05Conceptual Design Review

2 M24.01.05Computational module testing

Milestone10.08.07Final Design Report

5M18.01.07AO-MCAO RTC Platform Design

Milestone26.08.06Test Report6 M04.03.06AO Platform Prototype testing11 M21.03.05AO Platform Prototype development (HW & SW)

Milestone18.03.05Performance and test report M1M1

M2M2


WP 3.2 MCAO optimal controlWP 3.2 MCAO optimal control

Optimal Control methods for MCAO Optimal Control methods for MCAO Theoretical study of the optimal control in MCAO: robustness to Theoretical study of the optimal control in MCAO: robustness to model model errors, simulation and performance with realistic enderrors, simulation and performance with realistic end--toto--end modelend modelDemonstration on Onera AO laboratory bench: single GS Mono Demonstration on Onera AO laboratory bench: single GS Mono Conjugate AO with offConjugate AO with off--axis optimizationaxis optimizationDevelopment & Test on MAD star oriented @ ESODevelopment & Test on MAD star oriented @ ESO

High performance WFS in MCAO High performance WFS in MCAO Theoretical studies and identification of key performance issuesTheoretical studies and identification of key performance issues: :

•• linearity versus corrected linearity versus corrected FoVFoV (e.g. GS separation…), (e.g. GS separation…), •• sensitivity versus dynamicssensitivity versus dynamics

Experimental validation: Experimental validation: •• Select key issues to be validated by experiment on MAD, Select key issues to be validated by experiment on MAD, •• Perform the validation with ESOPerform the validation with ESO


WP 3.2: Schedule and deliverablesWP 3.2: Schedule and deliverables

T0 + 36T0 + 36High High perfperf. WFS in MCAO: Experimental validation on . WFS in MCAO: Experimental validation on MAD; reportMAD; report

T0 + 24T0 + 24High High perfperf. WFS in MCAO: Criteria, key issues for . WFS in MCAO: Criteria, key issues for WFS devices; reportWFS devices; report

T0 + 12T0 + 12High performance WFS in MCAO: Concepts & key High performance WFS in MCAO: Concepts & key parameters; reportparameters; report

T0 + 36T0 + 36Optimal control experimental validation on MADOptimal control experimental validation on MAD

T0 + 20T0 + 20Optimal control demonstration on AO bench & test Optimal control demonstration on AO bench & test reportreport

T0 + 12T0 + 12Optimal control theoretical study reportOptimal control theoretical study report

TimeTimeMilestonesMilestones


WP 3.3 & 3.4: WP 3.3 & 3.4: PiezoPiezo DM R&DDM R&DESOESO

DM Top Level specificationsDM Top Level specifications40x40 rectangular 40x40 rectangular --> 1304 total> 1304 total5 mm spacing 5 mm spacing --> 200mm diameter> 200mm diameterActuator stroke: Actuator stroke: ±±55µµmmInterInter--actuator stroke: actuator stroke: ±±1.21.2µµmmResidual WFE: 10 nm Residual WFE: 10 nm rmsrms

DM Control electronicDM Control electronicUp to 1500 channelsUp to 1500 channels±±400 V400 V

Piezo DMPiezo DM41412 2 act.act.


WP 3.3 & 3.4: WP 3.3 & 3.4: PiezoPiezo--DM & control scheduleDM & control schedule

CfTCfT to be issued:to be issued: July 04July 04Start of contract:Start of contract: Nov 04Nov 04DM control electronic Specs:DM control electronic Specs: Jan. 05Jan. 05Design review, end of phase 1:Design review, end of phase 1: June 05June 05DM control electronic design review:DM control electronic design review: Sept. 05Sept. 05DM control electronic prototype:DM control electronic prototype: Feb. 06Feb. 06DM manufactured, end of phase 2:DM manufactured, end of phase 2: May 07May 07Test report, end of phase 3:Test report, end of phase 3: July 07July 07Provisional acceptance, phase 4:Provisional acceptance, phase 4: Oct.07Oct.07


Interaction between Work packagesInteraction between Work packagesESOESO

Adaptive secondary

WP 3.5

RTC Platform R&D: WP 3.1Thin convex shell: WP 3.6

DSM Simulator MOEMS R&D: WP 3.7


WP 3.5: VLT adaptive M2 designWP 3.5: VLT adaptive M2 design

Specifications preparedSpecifications prepared15 months feasibility/ conceptual design study (01.04)15 months feasibility/ conceptual design study (01.04)

Validate I/Fs with present VLT (volume, weight, dissipation)Validate I/Fs with present VLT (volume, weight, dissipation)Number of actuator & actuator spacing Number of actuator & actuator spacing Actuator response time Actuator response time Total and inter actuator stroke requirementsTotal and inter actuator stroke requirementsThin shell requirement and feasibility Thin shell requirement and feasibility WP3.6Calibration issuesCalibration issues


SHELL THICKNESS vs ACT.S SP. SHELL < 15 nm RMS WFMMT < 64 nm, P45 < 28 nm

MAGNET GLUING TEST (Phase 2)

CURRENT (LBT) ACT.S SPACING → 1015 ACTsNEW MAGNET DESIGN26.5mm PITCH → 1300 ACTs

LBT672 POWER = 2000 W(1300 ACTs → 3000 W)

WP 3.5: VLT Adaptive secondaryWP 3.5: VLT Adaptive secondary


WP 3.5: VLTWP 3.5: VLT DM2 coordinationDM2 coordination

• control system simulation

• control system design • embedded SW design

• HW design • HW prototyping (dynamic performance opt.)

• optimization of size & power consumption

• mechanical/thermal design • FEA

• actuators/magnet design

• handling, integration procedures + MGSE

• system & specs overview

• control law design

• optical claibration & testing

• engineering SW


WP 3.5: VLT Adaptive secondary PlanWP 3.5: VLT Adaptive secondary Plan

To+ 4M Phase 1: I/Fs analysis and straw-man design

5M ÷ 9M Phase 2: Deformable mirror surface quality and dynamical performance

10M ÷ 15M Phase 3: Conceptual design and analysis

16M ÷ 24M Phase 4: Preliminary design

25M ÷ 36M Phase 5: Final design


WP 3.6: Thin shell R&D plan

Demonstration of a large convex glass shell manufac 620 days 26-10-04Spec. of a ~1-m convex glass shell prototype 2 mons 26-10-04Manufacturing process and Test set-up study of a ~1-m glass 5 mons 21-12-04Study review 0 days 09-05-05Manufacturing of a ~1m glass shell prototype 15 mons 30-08-05Testing of the ~1m glass shell 5 mons 24-10-06Acceptance review 0 days 12-03-07

09-05

12-03

Task Name Duration Start

H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H12003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Call for tender will be issued

- Spec. of a ~ 1m convex glass shell prototype INSU/INAF/ESO

- Manufacturing process and test set-up study INSU

- Manufacturing of the ~ 1m glass shell prototypeINSU- Testing of the ~ 1m glass shell INSU

- Study review INSU

- Acceptance review INSU


WP 3.7: Specification of MOEMSWP 3.7: Specification of MOEMS

30nm?15nm30nm15nm15nm30nm30nm Best flat WFE rms

<500Hz?1.5kHz TBC

1kHz2kHz2kHz<1kHz<1kHzFrequency cut off

?1.2 µm1 µm1 µm1.1 µm

1.2 µm-Inter-actuator stroke

10-15µm10 µm2 µm2 µm10 µm10 µm10 µmMech. stroke

~1mm~2mm2mm<1mm1mm1 mm1mmActuator spacing

?Circular geometry

magnetic

electro static

electro static

electro static

magneticPrinciple? /Comment

~100130010040 000(200x200)

150010 000100# Actuators

Ophtamology(TBC)

MUSE M2 Simulator

VLTI-AT(1.8m)

X-AO forOWL-ELT

X-AO on 8m

OWL-ELT100m-60mButtons

VLT-8mFalcon AO Buttons

Micro –DM specification overview


WP 3.7: WP 3.7: towardtoward 2K MOEMS R&D2K MOEMS R&D

LAOG/LETI : LAOG/LETI : electrostaticelectrostatic mirrormirror64 64 actuatorsactuators2 kHz, 8um 2 kHz, 8um strokestroke

600µm

Prototype


WP 3.7: WP 3.7: VoiceVoice coilcoil MOEMS DMMOEMS DM

LAOG/LETI: LAOG/LETI: VoiceVoice coilcoil mirrormirrorSiliconSilicon membranemembrane2mm pitch 2mm pitch 52 52 actuatorsactuatorsStrokeStroke > 50um> 50um


WP 3.7: MOEMS control WP 3.7: MOEMS control electronicselectronics

DeveloppedDevelopped by LAOG:by LAOG:32 32 channelchannel modules modules includingincluding DAC DAC andand HV amplifier HV amplifier (200V)(200V)ScalableScalable to >2000 to >2000 channelschannelsDigital InterfaceDigital InterfaceFrameFrame update = 32usupdate = 32us

50mm


WP 3.7: MOEMS R&D scheduleWP 3.7: MOEMS R&D schedule

µDM SpecificationµDM Call for tenderµDM Preliminary DesignµDM Final DesignµDM ManufacturingElectronics design and prototypingElectronics manufacturingPackaging design and prototypingPackaging manufacturingTest bench definitionTest bench development

2004 2005 2006 2007

Contract1st Demonstrator

2k µDMTest Report+ 60 actuators magnetic DM (2005Q4)


WP 3.8: High Order WFS experimentWP 3.8: High Order WFS experimentINAFINAF

XAO systems will require very high accuracy WFSs. • 2 WFS candidates Pyramid and Shack Hartmann

• Simulation on-going at ONERA-MPIA and ESO.

• Experiment to cross check critical issues for high order WFS

• Open loop comparison then low temporal frequency (~2Hz)


WP 3.8: High Order WFS experimentWP 3.8: High Order WFS experiment

SH & PWFS design (ESO-INAF-Durham

Design of the test bench:1) Using the LBT672b unit (Sep05)2) Using Xinetics 349 DM in Heidelberg

WFSs characterization:Interaction matrix identificationMeasurements SNR and repetabilityAliasing contributions to WF error

Definition ofthe exp. study


JRA 1 OrganizationJRA 1 Organization


JRA1 Management tool: FTEsJRA1 Management tool: FTEsWORK PACKAGE

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total/Requested FTE (in pyear) to EC 116.60 17.65 36.9 6.25 8.50 1.00 9.00 4.50 25.10 2.00 20.10 0.00 3.80 1.90 11.4 2.00Total/Requested FTE (in k€) to EC 8551.10 1370.80 2952 500 425 50 454 227 1632 130 1407 0 608 304 912 160

Adaptive Optics JRP Management 3.40 3.00 3.4 3Proposal phase 0.00 0.00

AO-JRP Proposal Preparation 0.10 0.00 0.1 0AO-JRP consolidation with I3 OPTICON 0.10 0.00 0.1 0OPTICON I3 proposal evaluation by EC 0.00 0.00 0 0OPTICON I3 contract negociation with EC/partners 0.20 0.00 0.2 0

Joint Research Project management and follow-up 3.00 3.00 3 3

2nd Generation AO Systems Design 72.35 2.00 19.5 0 3.5 0 0 0 16.1 0 20.1 0 0 0 11.4 2XAO System design study 30.70 0.00 2.5 0 14.1 0 14.1 0

XAO Phase A Study specifications 0.00 0.00XAO Phase A Study 1 (2004) 4.10 0.00 0.1 0 4 0XAO Phase A Study 2 (2004) 4.10 0.00 0.1 0 4 0Review of Phase A Studies; Concept selection 0.30 0.00 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0Specification for the XAO development 0.20 0.00 0.2 0XAO Design phase 22.00 0.00 2 0 10 0 10 0

L/NGS MCAO System design Studies 29.60 2.00 16.2 0 2 0 11.4 2AO Top level requirements 0.00 0.00L/NGS MCAO Simulation & Performance 0.00 0.00L/NGS MCAO Conceptual Design Study 0.00 0.00Conceptual Design Study review & evaluation 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0N/LGS MCAO system specifications 1.60 0.00 0.2 0 1 0 0.4 0N/LGS MCAO system design 28.00 2.00 16 0 1 0 11 2

Multiobject WFS prototype for GTC 1.80 0.00Specification of the Multi-object WFS prototype development 0.20 0.00Feasibility study 0.40 0.00Multi-object WFS conceptual design 0.40 0.00Multi-object WFS prototype development 0.40 0.00Multi-object WFS prototype testing in the laboratory 0.40 0.00

Multiple FOV MCAO System with NGS 10.25 0.00 0.75 0 3.5 0 6 0MFOV-MCAO Simulation & Performance 1.00 0.00 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 06' FOV ground layer prototype design 5.00 0.00 0.25 0 0.75 0 4 06' FOV ground layer prototype manufacturing 1.00 0.00 0.5 0 0.5 06' FOV ground layer prototye AIT 3.25 0.00 1.75 0 1.5 0

ONERA NOVAINSU MPIAAO- JRP ESO INAF Durham


Status of Partner committed FTEs (2)Status of Partner committed FTEs (2)

Enabling Techno. for 2nd Gen./ELT AO Systems 40.85 12.65 14.1 3.3 5 1 9 4.5 9 2 0 0 3.8 1.9 0 0 0 02nd generation of AO Real-Time Computer platform 14.50 6.75 7.5 3.25 7 3.5

Specification of the 2nd gen. AO and MCAO RTC Platform 1.00 0.50 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25Conceptual design study 2.00 0.50 1 0 1 0.5Computational module procurement & testing 2.50 1.25 1 0.5 1.5 0.75AO Platform prototype development (HW & SW) 3.50 1.75 2 1 1.5 0.75AO Platform prototype testing 2.50 1.25 1.5 0.75 1 0.5Test report 1.00 0.50 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25AO-MCAO RTC platform Final design 2.00 1.00 1 0.5 1 0.5

Optimal control methods for MCAO systems 3.90 1.20 1.5 0 2.4 1.2Specification for MCAO Optimal control methods study 0.10 0.00 0.1 0 0 0Theoretical-experimental Study of the optimal control in MCAO 0.90 0.30 0.1 0 0.8 0.3Development of the optimal control for MAD 1.00 0.50 0.3 0 0.7 0.5Implementation of Recons. Method on MAD 0.70 0.00 0.5 0 0.2 0Testing of reconstruction method on MAD 1.20 0.40 0.5 0 0.7 0.4

2nd Generation Piezo DM 0.65 0.00 0.65 0Specification of the 1.5K-actuator piezzo stack DM 0.10 0.00 0.1 0Call for Tender for the design and prototyping 0.10 0.00 0.1 0Design of 1.5K-Actuator DM Prototype 0.10 0.00 0.1 0Development of 1.5K-Actuator DM Prototype 0.10 0.00 0.1 0Testing & evaluation of the 1.5K-Actuator Prototype 0.25 0.00 0.25 0

2nd generation Piezo DM drive electronics R&D 0.60 0.00 0.6 0Conceptual design study specifications 0.10 0.00 0.1 0Conceptual design study 0.00 0.00 0 0Specification of the 1.5K act.DM Drive electronics 0.10 0.00 0.1 0Call for Tender for the design and prototyping 0.10 0.00 0.1 01.5K act. Piezo DM Drive Elec. Design 0.10 0.00 0.1 0 DM Drive Electronics demonstration Prototype development 0.10 0.00 0.1 0DM drive electronics prototype testing 0.10 0.00 0.1 0

VLT Adaptive secondary design Study 2.85 1.00 0.85 0 2 1Spec. of the VLT Adaptive secondary feasibility study 0.25 0.00 0.25 0Feasibility/concept Study of VLT Adaptive Secondary 0.25 0.00 0.25 0Feasibility Study review 0.25 0.00 0.25 0Preliminary design of VLT Adaptive secondary 2.10 1.00 0.1 0 2 1

WORK PACKAGE

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

AO- JRP ESO INAF Durham GrantecanONERA NOVAINSU MPIA


Status of Partner committed FTEs (3)Status of Partner committed FTEs (3)

Large convex glass shell manufacturing demo. 2.90 2.00 0.4 0 2.5 2Spec. of a ~1-m convex glass shell prototype 0.20 0.00 0.1 0 0.1 0Manuf. process and Test set-up study of a ~1m glass shell proto 1.10 0.50 0.1 0 1 0.5Manufacturing of a ~1m glass shell prototype 1.10 1.00 0.1 0 1 1Testing of the ~1m glass shell 0.50 0.50 0.1 0 0.4 0.5

2K act. Micro- Deformable Mirror (MDM) R&D 7.05 0.00 0.55 0 6.5 0MDM subcomponent pre-studies and R&D (Patent) 0.00 0.00Preliminary specifications of a 2K act. & low order MDMs 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0Preliminary Inquiry for the development of MDMs 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0Final specification of the MDMs prototypes 0.35 0.00 0.1 0 0.25 0MDM-MDM control electronic I/F definition 0.35 0.00 0.1 0 0.25 0Call For Tender for a 2k act. MDM 0.05 0.00 0.05 0 0 0Preliinary design of 2K-Actuator MDM Prototype 1.55 0.00 0.05 0 1.5 0Final design of a 2K Act. MDM Prototype 0.55 0.00 0.05 0 0.5 0Development of 2K-Actuator MDM Prototype 1.25 0.00 0 0 1.25 0Design of a ~60 act. magnetic MDM prototype 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 01st ~60 act. magnetic MDM prototype and validation 0.25 0.00 0 0 0.25 02nd ~60 act. magnetic MDM prototype and testing 0.50 0.00 0 0 0.5 0MDM Control electonic conceptual design 0.55 0.00 0.05 0 0.5 0MDM Control Electronics Final Design 0.55 0.00 0.05 0 0.5 0MDM Control Electronics Prototype development 0.50 0.00 0 0 0.5 0MDM Test and Calibration plan 0.60 0.00 0.1 0 0.5 0

High-Order WFS Experimental Study 8.40 1.70 2 0 3 0 2 1 1.4 0.7Specification of the HOWFS Experimental Study 0.10 0.00 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0HOWFS theoretical study and performance criteria definition 0.90 0.25 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.15Design of the HOWFSs (SH & P-WFS) & of the test bench 2.30 0.60 0.1 0 1 0 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.2Development of the HOWFSs and test bench 2.00 0.00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0HOWFSs performance testing and evaluation 3.10 0.85 0.5 0 0.9 0 1 0.5 0.7 0.35

WORK PACKAGE

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

AO- JRP ESO INAF Durham GrantecanONERA NOVAINSU MPIA


JRA1 Management tool: JRA1 Management tool: HWsHWs investmentinvestmentACTIVITY

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total/Requested (in k€) to EC 13450 4800 5715 2303 749 339 599 312 2969 1052 1653 246 621 317 922 170 223 61Total/Requested FTE (in k€) to EC 8551 1371 2952 500 425 50 454 227 1632 130 1407 0 608 304 912 160 162 0Total/Requested HW (in k€) to EC 4714 3244 2684 1724 310 275 130 70 1305 890 235 235 0 0 0 0 50 50

Total/Requested Travel (in k€) to EC 185 185 79 79 14 14 15 15 32 32 11 11 13 13 10 10 11 110 0

Proposal phase 0 0AO-JRP Proposal Preparation 0 0AO-JRP consolidation with I3 OPTICON 0 0OPTICON I3 proposal evaluation by EC 0 0OPTICON I3 contract negociation with EC/partners 0 0

Joint Research Project management and follow-up 0 02nd Generation AO Systems Design 710 430 270 0 130 120 0 0 25 25 235 235 0 0 0 0 50 50

XAO System design study 320 50 270 0 25 25 25 25XAO Phase A Study specifications 0 0XAO Phase A Study 1 (2004) 135 0 135 0 0 0 0 0XAO Phase A Study 2 (2004) 135 0 135 0 0 0 0 0Review of Phase A Studies; Concept selection 0 0 0 0 0 0Specification for the XAO development 0 0 0 0 0 0XAO Design phase 50 50 25 25 25 25

L/NGS MCAO System design Studies 0 0AO Top level requirements 0 0L/NGS MCAO Simulation & Performance 0 0L/NGS MCAO Conceptual Design Study 0 0Conceptual Design Study review & evaluation 0 0N/LGS MCAO system specifications 0 0N/LGS MCAO system design 0 0

Multiobject WFS prototype for GTC 50 50 50 50Specification of the Multi-object WFS prototype development 0 0 0 0Feasibility study 0 0 0 0Multi-object WFS design 0 0 0 0Multi-object WFS prototype development 40 40 40 40Multi-object WFS prototype testing in the laboratory 10 10 10 10

Multiple FOV MCAO System with NGS 340 330 130 120 210 210MFOV-MCAO Simulation & Performance 0 06' FOV ground layer prototype design 40 40 0 0 40 406' FOV ground layer prototype manufacturing 300 290 130 120 170 1706' FOV ground layer prototye AIT 0 0 0 0 0 06' FOV ground layer on sky testing 0 0

GrantecanMPIA ONERA NOVAINSUAO- JRP ESO INAF Durham


Status of Partner committed Status of Partner committed HWsHWs (2)(2)

Enabling Techno. for 2nd Gen./ELT AO Systems 4004 2814 2414 1724 180 155 130 70 1280 865 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02nd generation of AO Real-Time Computer platform 410 265 310 225 100 40

Specification of the 2nd gen. AO and MCAO RTC Platform 0 0Conceptual design study 150 95 100 75 50 20Computational module procurement & testing 200 140 150 120 50 20AO Platform prototype development (HW & SW) 60 30 60 30AO Platform prototype testing 0 0Test report 0 0AO-MCAO RTC platform Final design 0 0

Optimal control methods for MCAO systems 115 0 115 0Specification for MCAO Optimal control methods study 0 0Theoretical-experimental Study of the optimal control in MCAO 115 0 115 0Development of the optimal control for MAD 0 0Implementation of Recons. Method on MAD 0 0Testing of reconstruction method on MAD 0 0

2nd Generation Piezo DM 1200 850 1200 850Specification of the 1.5K-actuator piezzo stack DM 0 0Call for Tender for the design and prototyping 0 0Design of 1.5K-Actuator DM Prototype 150 100 150 100Development of 1.5K-Actuator DM Prototype 1050 750 1050 750Testing & evaluation of the 1.5K-Actuator Prototype 0 0

2nd generation Piezo DM drive electronics R&D 230 190 230 190Conceptual design study specifications 0 0Conceptual design study 0 0Specification of the 1.5K act.DM Drive electronics 0 0Call for Tender for the design and prototyping 0 01.5K act. Piezo DM Drive Elec. Design 90 90 90 90 DM Drive Electronics demonstration Prototype development 140 100 140 100DM drive electronics prototype testing 0 0

VLT Adaptive secondary design Study 589 474 559 459 30 15Spec. of the VLT Adaptive secondary feasibility study 0 0Feasibility/concept Study of VLT Adaptive Secondary 100 0 100 0Feasibility Conceptual design study review 0 0Preliminary design 489 474 459 459 30 15

Large convex glass shell manufacturing demo. 385 220 385 220Spec. of a ~1-m convex glass shell prototype 0 0Manuf. process & Test set-up study of a ~1-m glass shell proto. 105 30 105 30Manufacturing of a ~1m glass shell prototype 280 190 280 190Testing of the ~1m glass shell 0 0

ACTIVITY

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested



Status of Partner committed Status of Partner committed HWsHWs (3)(3)

2K act. Micro- Deformable Mirror (MDM) R&D 895 645 895 645MDM subcomponent pre-studies and R&D (Patent) 0 0Specification of a 2K act. MDM 0 0MDM-MDM control electronic I/F definition 0 0Call For Tender for a 2k act. MDM 0 0Preliinary design of 2K-Actuator MDM Prototype 270 150 270 150Final design of a 2K Act. MDM Prototype 200 160 200 160Development of 2K-Actuator MDM Prototype 270 235 270 235Design of a ~60 act. magnetic MDM prototype 0 0 0 01st ~60 act. magnetic MDM prototype and validation 20 10 20 102nd ~60 act. magnetic MDM prototype and testing 30 15 30 15MDM Control electonic conceptual design 40 10 40 10MDM Control Electronics Final Design 20 20 20 20MDM Control Electronics Prototype development 45 45 45 45MDM Test and Calibration plan 0 0 0 0

High-Order WFS Experimental Study 180 170 150 140 30 30Specification of the HOWFS Experimental Study 0 0HOWFS theoretical study and performance criteria definition 0 0Design of the HOWFSs & of the test bench 0 0Development of the HOWFSs and test bench 180 170 150 140 30 30HOWFSs performance testing and evaluation 0 0

ACTIVITY

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested

Total

Requested



Financial contractual Financial contractual situation before the last situation before the last change recommended change recommended

by ECby EC

Organisation short name

RTD activities

Direct cost 5223of which subcontracting 2524indirect cost 492Total eligible costs 5715

2303Direct cost 724of which subcontracting 0indirect cost 26Total eligible costs 749







61Direct cost 12062.7of which subcontracting 3344.0indirect cost 1387.1Total eligible costs 13449.8

4800.0

FINANCIAL INFORMATION- WHOLE DURATION OF THE PROJECT (K€)

ESO

INAF-OAA

Estimated eligible costs and requested EC contribution

Durham

INSU

MPIA

ONERA

NOVA

GTC

TOTAL

Eligible costs

Requested EC contribution

Eligible costs


Eligible costs


Eligible costs


Eligible costs

Eligible costs






Eligible costs

Eligible costs

Eligible costs


Financial situation Financial situation for the first 18for the first 18--

months (before EC months (before EC modification)modification)


RTD activities










2610.0




Eligible costs

Eligible costs

TOTAL

NOVA

GTC


Eligible costs

Eligible costs

Eligible costs


MPIA

ONERA

Durham

INSU

Eligible costs

Eligible costs



FINANCIAL INFORMATION- FIRST 18-months(K€)

ESO

INAF-OAA

Eligible costs


Eligible costs


Estimated eligible costs and requested EC contribution


JRA1 cashJRA1 cash--flowflow

00M49 - M60Reporting Periods 5





in which first 6 monthsTOTAL

Estimated Grant to the Budget

Month x - Month yReporting Periods

ESTIMATED BREAKDOWN OF THE EC CONTRIBUTION PER REPORTING PERIOD


Change of EC financial rules (1)Change of EC financial rules (1)

1) Organizations with AC financial model MUST charge 20% 1) Organizations with AC financial model MUST charge 20% indirect costs. Request exactly 100% of Eligible costs indirect costs. Request exactly 100% of Eligible costs

(a) direct costs:(a) direct costs: A of which subA of which sub--contractingcontracting(b) indirect costs:(b) indirect costs: 0.2 x (A 0.2 x (A -- subcontracting)subcontracting)(c) Total eligible costs:(c) Total eligible costs: C= A+ BC= A+ B(d) EC contribution:(d) EC contribution: CC

2) Organizations with FCF model MUST charge indirect costs 2) Organizations with FCF model MUST charge indirect costs at 20% of direct costs. (FC contractors can use any indirect at 20% of direct costs. (FC contractors can use any indirect value they wish, for later audit)value they wish, for later audit)

3) Organizations with either FC or FCF model must claim from 3) Organizations with either FC or FCF model must claim from the EC exactly 50% of their listed total eligible cost. the EC exactly 50% of their listed total eligible cost.


Partner contract changes requiredPartner contract changes required

ESO ESO FCF FCF Eligible costs reduced 5223K Eligible costs reduced 5223K 4606K, 4606K, INSU INSU FCF FCF Eligible costs reduced 2969K Eligible costs reduced 2969K 2104K,2104K,INAFINAF FCFFCF Eligible costs reduced 750K Eligible costs reduced 750K 678K,678K,MPIA MPIA AC AC Eligible costs reduced 1653K Eligible costs reduced 1653K 246K, 246K, NOVANOVA AC AC Eligible costs reduced 922K Eligible costs reduced 922K 170K170KIACIAC FCFFCF Eligible costs reduced 223K Eligible costs reduced 223K 122K122KONERAONERA FC FC no change needed no change needed DurhamDurham ACAC Eligible costs reduced 599K t Eligible costs reduced 599K t 312K312KNO IMPACT ON MONEY ACTUALLY RECEIVED FROM ECNO IMPACT ON MONEY ACTUALLY RECEIVED FROM EC

EC AUDIT WILL BE BASED ON THESE NEW NUMBERSEC AUDIT WILL BE BASED ON THESE NEW NUMBERSBUT NO CHANGE ON DELIVERABLESBUT NO CHANGE ON DELIVERABLES

THEREFORE INTERNAL MONITORING WILL BE BASED ON THEREFORE INTERNAL MONITORING WILL BE BASED ON THE AGREED RESSOURCES DURING NEGOTIATIONTHE AGREED RESSOURCES DURING NEGOTIATION


Financial contractual Financial contractual situation after the situation after the

change of financial change of financial rulerule

CAREFULL:Absolutely no change in term of deliverablesPartner should keep internal resources as

promised during negotiation


RTD activities










4800

GTC Eligible costs


TOTAL Eligible costs


ONERA Eligible costs


NOVA Eligible costs


INSU Eligible costs


MPIA Eligible costs


INAF-OAA Eligible costs


Durham Eligible costs


FINANCIAL INFORMATION- WHOLE DURATION OF THE Estimated eligible costs and requested

EC contribution

ESO Eligible costs



JRA1 detailed schedule toolJRA1 detailed schedule tool


JRA1 schedule (2)JRA1 schedule (2)


JRA1 MONITORINGJRA1 MONITORING

JRA1 general meeting every 9 monthsJRA1 general meeting every 9 monthsJRA1 progress report / each partner every 9 months JRA1 progress report / each partner every 9 months (.doc template will be provided) including technical (.doc template will be provided) including technical annexannexFTE & HW sheets (.FTE & HW sheets (.xlsxls template will be provided)template will be provided)General meeting viewgraphs to be provided in .General meeting viewgraphs to be provided in .pptpptWEB page with password will be createdWEB page with password will be created


JRA 1 Monitoring: Progress reportsJRA 1 Monitoring: Progress reports

Scope: Scope: WPsWPs concerned by the reportconcerned by the reportWP XXWP XX

Status of WP xx (max 2 pages) as far as possible refer to the teStatus of WP xx (max 2 pages) as far as possible refer to the technical chnical annex avoid annex avoid blablablabla….….Milestones achieved, actions completed (Milestones achieved, actions completed (w.r.tw.r.t JRA1 schedule)JRA1 schedule)Area of concerns: change of specs, schedule, deliverables, cost,Area of concerns: change of specs, schedule, deliverables, cost, FTEs….FTEs….Plan for next period: activities, deliverablesPlan for next period: activities, deliverables

WP YY etc…..WP YY etc…..Technical annex shall include (in electronic form):Technical annex shall include (in electronic form):

Specifications/ Statement of workSpecifications/ Statement of workConceptualConceptual--PreliminaryPreliminary--Final design reportsFinal design reportsTest reportsTest reportsPapers mentioning OPTICON & present EC contract (info to be provPapers mentioning OPTICON & present EC contract (info to be provided)ided)

FTE time sheets & list of expenditures (.FTE time sheets & list of expenditures (.xlsxls))


RECOMMENDED EXAMPLE OF FTE TIME SHEETS / RECOMMENDED EXAMPLE OF FTE TIME SHEETS / MONTHMONTH


Reporting: Time sheet reportReporting: Time sheet reportTIME SHEET

WORK PACKAGES WP #

Mgmt Coordination WP 1 11 0.01

XAO System Feasibility and Design WP 2.1

(L/NGS) MCAO Design f. VLT WP 2.2

Multi-object WFS f. GTC WP 2.3

Multiple FOV WFS f. LBT WP 2.4

2nd Gen RTC Platform WP 3.1

Optimal Control Methods f. MCAO Systems WP 3.2

Hifg Density Piezo-Stack Deform. Mirror (DM) WP 3.3

Piezo DM Control Electronics WP 3.4

VLT Adaptive Secondary Design Study WP 3.5

Demonstration of a Large Convex Glass Shell WP 3.6

2K Actuator & Low Order Micro-DM (MDM) R&D WP 3.7

High Order WFS Experimental Study WP 3.8

EC funded manpower (Y/N) Y 11 0.01

Hours/Year 1760 313

Date: Signature by Partner Scientific in Charge:

Please indicate the Cost (EUR) of 1 FTE / Year (including overhead): 50,000

EC FUNDED GRAND TOTAL MANPOWER COST(EUR)

PARTNER FUNDED GRAND TOTAL MANPOWER COST (EUR)

GRAND TOTAL HOURS/FTE

Total in FTE (EUR)Total Hours

Jul Aug SepFeb Mar JunApr May

Name of staff:

Partner: REPORTING PERIOD 1

JANUARY - SEPTEMBER 2004

11

Jan

EUROPEAN COMMISSION AO - JRA 1 / OPTICON


Reporting: HW / travel ExpendituresReporting: HW / travel Expenditures

Additional tables might be necessary to detail & justify all expenditures per WP.

WORK PACKAGES WP # Subcontract Hardware Subcontract Hardware

Mgmt Coordination WP 1 10 10 5 5

XAO System Feasibility and Design WP 2.1

(L/NGS) MCAO Design f. VLT WP 2.2

Multi-object WFS f. GTC WP 2.3

Multiple FOV WFS f. LBT WP 2.4

2nd Gen RTC Platform WP 3.1

Optimal Control Methods f. MCAO Systems WP 3.2

Hifg Density Piezo-Stack Deform. Mirror (DM) WP 3.3

Piezo DM Control Electronics WP 3.4

VLT Adaptive Secondary Design Study WP 3.5

Demonstration of a Large Convex Glass Shell WP 3.6

2K Actuator & Low Order Micro-DM (MDM) R&D WP 3.7

High Order WFS Experimental Study WP 3.8

10 10 5 5

GRAND TOTAL FUNDED BY THE PARTNER (including 20% overhead) 11

GRAND TOTAL

GRAND TOTAL (including 20% overhead)

13

Total Amount (k€ ) (w/o Overhead)

Total Amount (k€ ) charged to EC (w/o Overhead)

HARDWARE & TRAVEL EXPENDITURES REPORT

AO - JRA 1 OPTICON

Partner:

24

TRAVEL COSTS (k€ ) 2

GRAND TOTAL TO BE INVOICED TO EC (including 20% overhead)

DESCRIPTION

REPORTING PERIOD 1

January 2004 - September 2004

Date: Signature by Partner Scientific in Charge:


AURAAURA--ESO agreementESO agreement

Agreement has been signed between ESO and AURA to Agreement has been signed between ESO and AURA to collaborate on critical collaborate on critical ELT technologyELT technology developmentsdevelopmentsThis agreement includes AO R&D & in particular:This agreement includes AO R&D & in particular:

Large Deformable mirrorLarge Deformable mirrorLarge thin shell Large thin shell CCD for AOCCD for AOPiezoPiezo stack Deformable mirrorstack Deformable mirrorMCAO reconstructionMCAO reconstruction

Objectives is to share development cost or explore Objectives is to share development cost or explore alternative technologies for a given specificationalternative technologies for a given specificationOPTICON board position on if / how coordinate with related OPTICON board position on if / how coordinate with related JRA 1JRA 1--2 activities is required2 activities is required


CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS

WPsWPs defined: Tasks, milestones, resourcesdefined: Tasks, milestones, resourcesManagement tools are definedManagement tools are definedMonitoring/reporting tools have been defined: Monitoring/reporting tools have been defined:

Time sheet, Time sheet, HW expenditures, HW expenditures, Matching fundsMatching fundsRegular progress report from each partnerRegular progress report from each partner

National agencies should maintain the original level National agencies should maintain the original level of funding independently of EC contract of funding independently of EC contract

joint research activity 1 2nd generation adaptive optics ... · final design review may, 2007 phase...

Documents