journal index 2001 - institution of structural engineers · · 2013-06-20design of unbraced...
TRANSCRIPT
INDEX
Volume 79 2001
AAlexander, S D B
Integrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . . Aminpour, F
The River Karun Bridge, Ahvaz, Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Anderson, R G
Integrated approach to structural maintenance . . . . . . . . . Augarde, C E
2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Modelling skewed masonry arches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BBainbridge, R J
Achieving durability of timber structures: an integratedapproach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bakht, BSplitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Beal, A NA proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– CorrespondenceFactors of ignorance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Beckett, TThe British Airways London Eye: Part 5: Pier and impactprotection system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Beeby, AA proposal for partial safety factors for soil pressures inBS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bennett, DWest Rail Viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Berenbak, JThe British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure . . . . .
Bessant, G TFatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Blockley, D IThinking outside of the box: with Phil’s eight new maxims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– President’s Address
The President 2001-2002: Converting the dream intoreality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Boothy, T ETransverse behaviour of masonry arch bridges . . . . . . . . .
Brodie, AKingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Burgoyne, C JLateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beamson flexible bearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buriek, L LSecond-order analysis of building and industrial structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical note: second-order analysis
CCarpenter, J
Health and safety: turning concern into action . . . . . . . . .
Chan, BChallenge for the future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chapman, J CFatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Clark, G MThe Gateshead Millennium Bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Clark, L AShear capacity of honeycombed reinforced concrete beams
Cleland, D JInfluence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Climaco, J C T SFlexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cook, N JParametric calibration of BS 6399: Part 2: 1997 (effectivedynamic pressures) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cooke, G M EDeflections of concrete floor slabs exposed to standardisedfires and some implications for design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cusens, A RTests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . .
DDallard, P
The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionThe Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutions .
Das, P BThe design and construction of a masonry arch roof withfly-ash lime and gypsum block masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Das, P KThe design and construction of a masonry arch roof withfly-ash lime and gypsum block masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Davey, JModelling skewed masonry arches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derwent, J MThe frequency of dance-type loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Desai, SStructural design for small projects: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Viewpoint: building control
Desflammes, PThe British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . . .
Devitt, STom McCormack 1949–2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Obituary
Dobson, RHow solid is that paper wall? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EEaton, Keith
John Hill’s tour: 10 August–15 September 2001 . . . . . . . . Ellis, B R
Serviceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eyre, JThe Gateshead Millennium Bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
19
27
30
17
24
25
22
26
21
173415
18
18
14
27
12
29
10
18
7
30
30
19
9
3
15
16
23/24
4
12
18
22228
6
6
7
6
6
2
18
13
19
21
3
INDEX Volume 79, 2001 AUTHOR INDEX
39
19
19
1914
19
17
3716
34
18
16
19
27
22
14
21
3245
23
19
12
23/24
16
23/24
17
17
10
2120
2
8
23/24
2
9
20
18
9
1923/24
6
3
12
Issue PageIssue Page
FFairfield, C A
Risk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fitzpatrick, Tony . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .The Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutions.
Flint, AThe Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutions.
Fordyce, M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Improving international participation: council membershipreform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fried, A NEnhancements to the resisting moment of unreinforcedmasonry walls due to shifts in the neutral axis position. . .
GGallon, M J
Integrated approach to structural maintenance . . . . . . . . . Gascoigne, M J
Integrated approach to structural maintenance . . . . . . . . . Gilbert, S G
Enhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gilfillan, J REnhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ginty, DThe frequency of dance-type loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HHankin, R
The design of Westminster Station (Jubilee Line Extension) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Harvey, W JApplying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical note
Hensman, J SDesign of unbraced composite frames using the wind-moment method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hill, JSir Alan Harris – a personal appreciation by the President
Hill, TPredicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . .
Hirst, J GTate Modern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Hobbs, R EFatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hopkinson, JFire safety engineering: the consultant’s view. . . . . . . . . .
Houlsby, G T2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Development of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IIvanov, R I
Long effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Izatt, CDesign of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JJackson, P
Is bridge assessment losing its credibility? . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jaeger, L GSplitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Janner, M MThe World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space . . . . . .
Jenkins, W MA neural-network-based reanalysis method for integrationwith structural design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jensen, FThe Downland gridshell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ji, TThe frequency of dance-type loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Johnson, R Long effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jones, A CEden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
KKassenge, S K
Second-order analysis of building and industrial structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical note: second-order analysis
Kelly, O JConstruction of the Downland gridshell . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Khalil, NTests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . .
Kotsovos, M DThe 1999 Athens earthquake: causes of damage notpredicted by structural concrete design methods . . . . . . . .
Kyriacou, G‘Good for Britain, good for business’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meeting demand creatively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operation HQ: a new look institution welcomes you. . . . . Safety: the voice of experience: Honorary Fellow’s Address
LLanser, A
The British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure. . . . . . Lawson, M
Paul Salter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– ObituaryLedbetter, S
Facade engineering: the challenge for structural engineersLee, T J
Inspection and repair of the M56 Thorley Lane post tensionbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Levitt, MSilane surfeit on the Second Severn Crossing and otherconcretes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liddell, W ICreating engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . – Gold Medal Address
Liu, G2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MMacLaurin, M
Plashet School footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maguire, J R
Engineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Malik, APaul Salter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – ObituaryThe British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure. . . . . .
Mann, A PThe British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . . .
McDermott-Smith, MSteel framing projects in Dublin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
25
25
16
27
19
30
19
25
21
23
1118137
19
11
13
24
14
27
19
15
33
1119
29
19
10
21
13
6
6
5
20
3
17
18
15
16101920
2
14
11
5
5
7
1
14
7
142
2
21
31
15
15
13
14
19
19
23
23
27
35
14
28
8
16
27
27
22
19
29
19
12
15
18
8
8
8
1
23/24
23/24
8
8
6
17
3
11
3
7
1
9
9
1
8
5
15
9
3
Issue Page Issue Page
Messenger, A GThe ‘bookend’ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Mettem, C JAchieving durability of timber structures: an integratedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michael, DGold Medal Address 2001: Values and change: benefit orproblem? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miller, ASecond-order analysis of building and industrial structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical note: second-order analysis
Milner, M WAchieving durability of timber structures: an integratedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moss, R MBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing. . . . . . . . . . .
NNelson, N
Advances in building design technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nethercot, D A
Design of unbraced composite frames using the wind-moment method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated design of tubular steelwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ng, K HRisk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nil, T FUse of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicholson, GThe British Airways London Eye: Part 4: Foundations . . .
OO’Meagher
Fire resistance of structural members: a performance basedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Olonisakin, A AIntegrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . .
Omar, WShear capacity of honeycombed reinforced concrete beams
PPalmer, M
Predicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . . Parker, M D
Tests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . . Pavlovic, M N
The 1999 Athens earthquake: causes of damage notpredicted by structural concrete design methods . . . . . . . .
Phipps, M ECharacteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Porter, M IDevelopment of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RRegan, P E
Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shear reinforcement against punching in reinforcedconcrete flat slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Richardson, CThe ‘bookend’ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Roberts, B JTransverse behaviour of masonry arch bridges . . . . . . . . .
Roberts, J MThe British Airways London Eye: Part 1: Background . . .
Robery, PEngineering and art: the Spitfire sculpture. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Russell, D PEnhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rymill, F MA proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Correspondence
SSamadian, F
Shear reinforcement against punching in reinforcedconcrete flat slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shaw, J MTate Modern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Sibbald, ARisk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simon, JApplying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls: technical note: arch and wall analysis . .
Simpson, BA proposal for partial safety factors for soil pressures in BS8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Smith, N JIntegrated design of tubular steelwork. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Soane, AWhat future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stansfield, KCrossing the Suez Canal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . . Climate change will exacerbate subsidence risk industrywarned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Designing for security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Global warming: issues for engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SCOSS argues for ‘a proper sense of balance’ on safetyissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Setting a new agenda for sustainable construction: WessexWater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Timber: a sustainable material. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stone, HSurvey of women members: a welcome first step . . . . . . .
Stratford, T JLateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beamson flexible bearings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subedi, NNeural networks in design of cold-formed steel members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research updatePunching resistance of reinforced concrete slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research updateRapid deployable light-weight roof structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Research update
Steel-concrete-steel double-skin . . . . .– Research updateSurtees, J O
Use of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sutherland, JFrank Newby: a creative and intensely visual man:– ObituarySir Alan Harris remembered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TTelford, I
Kingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
16
14
23
37
24
27
31
14
18
25
13
1515
81613
8
1412
6
23
22
22
2222
22
1010
3245
2
16
8
21
10
1
18
3
8
3
20
2117
71914
13
1217
8
6
21
21
2121
11
1323/24
1923/24
30
19
26
19
19
23
15
2825
31
22
32
20
39
17
16
21
23
31
29
25
24
30
21
13
17
19
3
17
14
13
113
18
11
2
13
23/24
15
7
18
15
23/24
8
23/24
10
13
9
4
Issue PageIssue Page
Tellet, JNew Parliament building: Portcullis House. . . . . . . . . . . .
Thompson, NThe British Airways London Eye: Part 1: Background . . .
Tizani, W M KIntegrated design of tubular steelwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tomor, AApplying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls. Technical note: arch and wall analysis . .
WWainwright, F H
Tate Modern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionWalley, F
From bomb shelters to postwar buildings: 40 years’ work asa civil engineer in government. Sutherland History Lecture
Willford, MAn investigation into crowd-induced vertical dynamicloads using available measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
XXie, M
Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
16
25
14
27
15
21
27
5
2
2
3
3
1
4
12
9
Issue Page
AAbrasion
Development of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members accidents . . . . . . . . . . . . Health and safety: turning concern into action aggregates . Using recycled aggregates: Wessex Water new operationscentre, Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ahvaz, IranThe River Karun Bridge, Ahvaz, Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AirfieldsThe World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space. . . . . .
AnalysisPredicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . . Risk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The frequency of dance-type loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AnchoragesInfluence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AppraisingFatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inspection and repair of the M56 Thorley Lane post tensionbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Arch bridgesRisk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ArchesApplying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls. technical note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Art galleriesTate Modern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
BBandstands
The De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . . Beams
Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beamson flexible bearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shear capacity of honeycombed reinforced concrete beamsSplitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BearingsLateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beamson flexible bearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure . . . . .
Bending momentsEnhancements to the resisting moment of unreinforcedmasonry walls due to shifts in the neutral axis position. . . Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BoltsUse of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BombsDesigning for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Box beam bridgesThe River Karun Bridge, Ahvaz, Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Box beamsWest Rail viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BlockworkCharacteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BridgesCrossing the Suez Canal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Engineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gateshead Millennium Bridge: a real eye-opener . . . . . . . Influence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Is bridge assessment losing its credibility? . . . . . . . . . . . . Kingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionSplitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionThe Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutions . The River Karun Bridge, Ahvaz, Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . View from the bridge: interview with Roger Evans. . . . . .
British Airways London EyeThe British Airways London Eye: Part 1: Background . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure. . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules. . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 4: Foundations . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 5: Pier and impactprotection system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BS 5950Second-order analysis of building and industrial structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical note: second-order analysis
BS 6399Parametric calibration of BS 6399: Part 2: 1997 (effectivedynamic pressures) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . An Investigation into crowd-induced vertical dynamicloads using available measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BS 8002A proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110
BS 8110A proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– CorrespondenceFactors of ignorance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . . Shear reinforcement against punching in reinforcedconcrete flat slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BucklingEngineering and art: the Spitfire sculpture . . . . . . . . . . . . Lateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beams on flexible bearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Use of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building regulationsFire safety engineering: the consultant’s view . . . . . . . . . .
Bye-LawsImproving international participation: Council membershipreform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CCables
Crossing the Suez Canal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure. . . . . .
CADA neural-network-based reanalysis method for integrationwith structural design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advances in building design technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How solid is that paper wall? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . .
6
15
332711
24153245
171734151910
16192932
34
19
22
21
18
18371639
24
14
23
22
22
13
1519
25151815
21
79
18
169
1923/24
1022228
165
2222
2
3
4
12
8
82120
23/24
10
16
6
11
9
8
212
13131317
29
12
16
19
25
16
3127
24
27
24
31
14
27
15
27
25
2317
17
2319
14
25
22
16
19
16
31
8
12
12
16
21
7
186
16
9
5
18
3
1
17
9
23/24
615
10
62
1
23/24
11
19
16
23/24
23/24
INDEX Volume 79, 2001 SUBJECT INDEXIssue PageIssue Page
CanopiesThe De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . .
CastingFlexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CEB-FIP Model Code 1990Shear reinforcement against punching in reinforcedconcrete flat slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CFRP laminatesEnhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ChloridesSilane surfeit on the Second Severn Crossing and otherconcretes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Civil engineeringFrom bomb shelters to postwar buildings: 40 years’ work asa civil engineer in government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Sutherland History Lecture
CladdingEden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Facade engineering: the challenge for structural engineers New Parliament building: Portcullis House. . . . . . . . . . . .
ClimateGlobal warming: issues for engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cold forged steelNeural networks in design of cold-formed steel members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research update
CollapseFire resistance of structural members: a performance basedapproach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ColumnsBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing . . . . . . . . . . Design of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . West Rail viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CompactingFlexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Composite beamLong effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Composite bridgeLong effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Composite constructionEnhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . West Rail viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Composite materialsSteel-concrete-steel double-skin composite construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Research update
CompressionEnhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 4: Foundations . . .
Compressive strengthCharacteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ConnectionsIntegrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . . Use of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ContractorsHealth and safety: turning concern into action . . . . . . . . . .
Corrosion protectionThe British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure . . . . . . View from the bridge: interview with Roger Evans . . . . . .
CouncilImproving international participation: Council membershipreform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cracking2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transverse behaviour of masonry arch bridges . . . . . . . . . .
CreepTests on slender reinforced concrete columns. . . . . . . . . . .
CrowdsAn investigation into crowd-induced vertical dynamic loadsusing available measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Serviceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The frequency of dance-type loads cyclic loads . . . . . . . . . Development of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DDampers
The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionThe De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . .
DecksInfluence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plashet School footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DeflectionDeflections of concrete floor slabs exposed to standardisedfires and some implications for design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Developing worldThe design and construction of a masonry arch roof with fly-ash lime and gypsum block masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DublinSteel framing projects in Dublin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DuctingNew Parliament building: Portcullis House . . . . . . . . . . . .
Durability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Achieving durability of timber structures: an integratedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dynamic loadsAn investigation into crowd-induced vertical dynamic loadsusing available measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Predicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . . Second-order analysis of building and industrial structurestechnical note: second-order analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Serviceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionThe frequency of dance-type loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Parametric calibration of BS 6399: Part 2: 1997 (effectivedynamic pressures) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EEarth pressure
A proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Correspondence
7
12
1910
13
192721
21
21
3027
29
173415
2415
26
25
18
19
6
19
21
3016
19
3017342713
22
1837
12
25
8
199
18
12
216
8
222217
1614
12
23/24
6
21
2
17
12
207
3
2122226
20
4
821
15
25
24
23
14
15
30136
13
22
20
23
1216
25
19
19
2316
22
23
2532
31
39
22
17
23/24
10
8
5
4
20112
14
21
13
14
1523/24
23/24
5
5
823/24
21
8
23/242
23/24
23/24
11
Issue PageIssue Page
Earthquake loadsThe 1999 Athens earthquake: causes of damage notpredicted by structural concrete design methods . . . . . . . .
Eccentric loadsTests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . .
Eden Project, St Austell, CornwallEden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EducationCreating engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gold Medal Address 2001: Values and change: benefit orproblem? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Meeting demand creatively. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ElasticityEnhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EnvironmentGlobal warming: issues for engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Timber: a sustainable material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Environmental designSetting a new agenda for sustainable construction: WessexWater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Using recycled aggregates: Wessex Water new operationscentre, Bath . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equal opportunitiesSurvey of women members a welcome first step . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Structural news
ETFEEden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EurocodesCharacteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Factors of ignorance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ExplosionsDesigning for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Institution to review safety following American disaster . . What future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FFacades
2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Facade engineering: the challenge for structural engineers
FailuresInstitution to review safety following American disaster . . Is bridge assessment losing its credibility? . . . . . . . . . . . . SCOSS argues for ‘a proper sense of balance’ on safetyissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The 1999 Athens earthquake: causes of damage notpredicted by structural concrete design methods . . . . . . . . What future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FatigueDevelopment of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Predicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . . Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FibreglassThe De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . .
Finite element methodsPredicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . . Splitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire engineeringDesigning for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What future for tall buildings?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Challenge for the future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fire resistance of structural members: a performance basedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire propertiesDeflections of concrete floor slabs exposed to standardisedfires and some implications for design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire resistanceFire resistance of structural members: a performance basedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire safetyFire safety engineering: the consultant’s view . . . . . . . . . .
FlangesDesign of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Use of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flat slabsIntegrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . .
Flexural propertiesFlexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . . Tests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . .
FloorsDeflections of concrete floor slabs exposed to standardisedfires and some implications for design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Serviceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FootbridgesPlashet School footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Gateshead Millennium Bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutions . The Millennium Bridge, London . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
FoundationsCrossing the Suez Canal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 4: Foundations . . . The Gateshead Millennium Bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fracture mechanicsDevelopment of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FramesNew Parliament building: Portcullis House . . . . . . . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure . . . . . . Use of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FrequenciesPredicting the response of slender steel staircases . . . . . . . Serviceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Millennium Bridge London: problems and solutions . The frequency of dance-type loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FRPBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing. . . . . . . . . . .
GGlasgow Design Centre, Scotland
Science Centre takes Glasgow into 21st century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural news
GlassDevelopment of crack size and limit state design methodsfor edge-abraded glass members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
161319
20
26
20
22
12
22
39
253921
26
30
15301534
15
12
303230
29
619
22
16
301527
23
6
29
23
21
30
27
2618
23
1312
14
16
6
30
3116
19
165
13
1913
515
8
2315
291627
15
16
17
19
192019
13
12
13
9
15
11
23/24
23/2423/24
18
12
21
1438
22
21
15
2023
8
22
11
7
2186
14
1
8
15
18
20
7
1910
8
1417
12
12
8
20
23/2420
5
191920
111
199
13
1520
879
17
7
10
5
Issue Page Issue Page
Facade engineering: the challenge for structural engineersThe British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . .
Glass fibreBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing . . . . . . . . . .
GlasshousesEden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gold Medal AddressCreating engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Gold Medal Address
Gold Medal awardsRecognising distinction: Gold Medal 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Structural news
GraduatesMeeting demand creatively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GridshellConstruction of the Downland gridshell . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HHangers
The World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space . . . . . Hazards
The British Airways London Eye: Part 5: Pier and impactprotection system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hong KongWest Rail viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HousingThe ‘bookend’ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Discussion
Humber BridgeView from the bridge: interview with Roger Evans . . . . .
IImpact
Design of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Designing for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increasing punching shearShear reinforcement against punching in reinforcedconcrete flat slabs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
InspectionsThe ‘bookend’ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionView from the bridge: interview with Roger Evans . . . . .
InsuranceClimate change will exacerbate subsidence risk industrywarned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Integrated designA neural-network-based reanalysis method for integrationwith structural design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated design of tubular steelwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JJacking
Kingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
JointsIntegrated design of tubular steelwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . .
JoistsStructural design for small projects viewpoint: buildingcontrol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jubilee Line Extension, LondonThe design of Westminster Station (Jubilee Line Extension) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
KKingston Bridge, London
Kingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
LLattice
The Downland grid shell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . British Museum Great Court opens to public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural news
LightingDesign of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . . .
Live loadsThe British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . . .
Load testsEnhancements to the resisting moment of unreinforcedmasonry walls due to shifts in the neutral axis position . . .
LoadsA proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– CorrespondenceBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing. . . . . . . . . . . Design of unbraced composite frames using the wind-moment method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beamson flexible bearings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Modelling skewed masonry arches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shear capacity of honeycombed reinforced concrete beams
London Underground LtdFatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Longitudinal shearLong effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MMaintaining
Integrated approach to structural maintenance. . . . . . . . . . Is bridge assessment losing its credibility? . . . . . . . . . . . . Operation HQ: a new look Institution welcomes you . . . . View from the bridge: interview with Roger Evans . . . . . .
ManagementTraining for engineering business management . . . . . . . . . Health and safety: turning concern into action. . . . . . . . . .
ManufacturingRapid deployable light-weight roof structure. . . . . . . . . . .
Masonry2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Characteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Enhancements to the resisting moment of unreinforcedmasonry walls due to shifts in the neutral axis position . . . Risk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The design and construction of a masonry arch roof withfly-ash lime and gypsum block masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Materials handlingUsing recycled aggregates: Wessex Water new operationscentre, Bath. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MathematicsGold Medal Address 2001: Values and change: benefit orproblem?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MeasuringAn investigation into crowd-induced vertical dynamicloads using available measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Applying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical noteEngineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
16
11
1229
29
14
1837
23
28
25
231417
27
19
19151310
1312
22
19
31
14
31
18
16
26
21
14
33
1329
23
30
27
5
18
25
25
34
16
30
10
1216
24
3010
8
2525
3245
2539
12
35
3245
112
14
20
7
1
10
17
21
2
23/24
13
5
1519
10
135
7
133
1923/24
323/24
62
17
1923/24
6
1
152
2
1
821
14
11
23/24
67
15
9
5
23/249
195
2212
21
1
23/24
1
18
6
12
19
12
3
7
Issue Page Issue Page
Military engineering‘Good for Britain, good for business’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Millennium Bridge, LondonGold Medal Address 2001: Values and change: benefit orproblem?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionThe Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutions .
Millennium Dome, Greenwich, LondonCreating engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Gold Medal Address
Mobile structuresThe De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . .
ModellingAdvances in building design technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moire fringe methodsApplying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls. technical note: arch and wall analysis . .
MonitoringEngineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MortarCharacteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multistorey buildingsDesigning for security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Engineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NNeural networks
A neural-network-based reanalysis method for integrationwith structural design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicholas Ratcliffe AwardNicholas Ratcliffe Award . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural news
OOak
Construction of the Downland gridshell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obituaries
Barry Scanes 1947–2001 . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural newsTseng Liang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural newsProfessor C S Krishnamoorthy . . . . . . . – Structural newsProfessor Sir Alan Harris . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural newsSir Alan Harris – a personal appreciation by the President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural news
David Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural newsVincent Thompson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Observation wheelsThe British Airways London Eye: Part 1: Background . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 2: Structure. . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 4: Foundations . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 5: Pier and impactprotection system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office buildingsDesigning for security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PParabolic arches
The Gateshead Millennium Bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pedestrians
The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
The Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solutionsPlashet School footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Permanent formworkBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing . . . . . . . . . .
PiersKingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The River Karun Bridge, Ahvaz, Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PlansStructural design for small projects . . . . . . . . – Viewpoint
PlasticsBehaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing . . . . . . . . . .
PlatesDesign of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PlywoodThe De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . .
PontoonsThe British Airways London Eye: Part 5: Pier and impactprotection system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pop concertsThe frequency of dance-type loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Portcullis House, LondonNew Parliament building: Portcullis House . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power stationsEngineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Precast concreteSetting a new agenda for sustainable construction: WessexWater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . West Rail viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PrefabricatedRapid deployable light-weight roof structure. . . . . . . . . . .
PreservingTimber: a sustainable material. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PresidentsDavid Blockley to become next IStructE President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Structural newsJohn Hill’s tour: 10 August– 15 September 2001. . . . . . . . Professor Sir Alan Harris: obituary . . . . – Structural newsSir Alan Harris – a personal appreciation by the President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural news
The President 2001–2002: Converting the dream intorealityThinking outside of the box: with Phil’s eight new maxims: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– President’s Address
PressuresParametric calibration of BS 6399: Part 2:1997 (effectivedynamic pressures) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prestressed concreteLateral instability of long-span prestressed concrete beamson flexible bearings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The River Karun Bridge, Ahvaz, Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PrestressingKingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional conductHealth and safety: turning concern into action. . . . . . . . . .
Progressive collapseDesigning for security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Institution to review safety following American disaster . . What future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Project managementThe British Airways London Eye: Part 1: Background . . .
PunchingPunching resistance of reinforced concrete slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research update
PVCThe World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space . . . . . .
10
1515
23
3219
12
23
12
15
34
27
6
33
1416
22
12
676
8
14
22
22
2319
32
12
165
13
16
22
25
814
14
1916
6
14
15
17
2
6
2
7
1223/24
21
17
4193
3
18
20
4
616
19
12
191920
2
21
21
11
26173415
27
15
15
14
3327
31
16
3313
25
11
25
10986
857
16192932
34
16
30
3417
16
1922228
7
17
13
3
79
23/24
19
720
13
1
17
3143
39
15
2222
2
19
3
2222
Issue Page Issue Page
RRailway stations
The design of Westminster Station (Jubilee Line Extension) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Discussion
West Rail viaducts, Hong Kong. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Recycling
Setting a new agenda for sustainable construction: WessexWater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Using recycled aggregates: Wessex Water new operationscentre, Bath. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reinforced concreteFlexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Punching resistance of reinforced concrete slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research updateShear capacity of honeycombed reinforced concrete beamsTests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . . Deflections of concrete floor slabs exposed to standardisedfires and some implications for design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ReinforcingIntegrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . . Behaviour of large diameter columns reinforced withwrapped glass fibre reinforced plastic tubing. . . . . . . . . . . Influence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RenovationOperation HQ: a new look Institution welcomes you. . . . .
RepairingFlexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beamsinvolving the addition of new concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated approach to structural maintenance . . . . . . . . . . Kingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
ReportsIs bridge assessment losing its credibility? . . . . . . . . . . . . SCOSS argues for ‘a proper sense of balance’ on safetyissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained facadesTate Modern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Discussion
Retaining wallsA proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Correspondence
RetrofitKingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The London Millennium footbridge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
RiskHealth and safety: turning concern into action . . . . . . . . . . Risk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RivetsFatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RoofsPlashet School footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rapid deployable light-weight roof structure . . . . . . . . . . . The World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space . . . . . .
SSafety
Challenge for the future. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Designing for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Factors of ignorance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Institution to review safety following American disaster . . Is bridge assessment losing its credibility? . . . . . . . . . . . . SCOSS argues for ‘a proper sense of balance’ on safetyissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Safety: the voice of experience: Honorary Fellow’s AddressThe British Airways London Eye: Part 1: Background . . . The British Airways London Eye: Part 3: Capsules . . . . . .
SecurityDesigning for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service awardInstitution Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ServiceabilityServiceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Serviceability limit stateDesign of unbraced composite frames using the wind-moment method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ShearIntegrated flexural and shear design for flat slabs . . . . . . . Long effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Influence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shear capacity of honeycombed reinforced concrete beams
SilosGiant grain terminal for China . . . . . . . – Structural newsIntegrated approach to structural maintenance . . . . . . . . . .
Single leaf masonryCharacteristic compressive strength of concrete blockmasonry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SlabsPunching resistance of reinforced concrete slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research update
Slender columnsTests on slender reinforced concrete columns . . . . . . . . . .
SoffitsDeflections of concrete floor slabs exposed to standardisedfires and some implications for design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SoilsA proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Correspondence
SpandrelsTransverse behaviour of masonry arch bridges. . . . . . . . . .
SteelIntegrated design of tubular steelwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long effects of concentrated longitudinal shear incomposite bridge beams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Steel-concrete-steel double-skin composite construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research updateThe De la Warr Pavilion Bandstand, Bexhill . . . . . . . . . . . Eden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Steel framing projects in Dublin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space . . . . . .
StiffeningUse of threaded rod compression stiffening in end plateconnections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
StrengtheningKingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– DiscussionSilane surfeit on the Second Severn Crossing and otherconcretes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stressed skin structuresEden Project, Cornwall: design, development andconstruction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Structural analysisA neural-network-based reanalysis method for integrationwith structural design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second-order analysis of building and industrial structurestechnical note: second-order analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Structural membersFire resistance of structural members: a performance basedapproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11
16
12
30
28
19
39
19
2417
1119
31
22
21
26
37
21
25
19
2215
301925
22
3245
14
30
25
19
20
19
3
21
11
1
23/24
5
1615
223/24
23/24
21
18
12
21
9
3
5
2117
202121
11
1923/24
5
20
13
3
13
3516
14
16
25
221721
26
39
23
24
13
25193245
15
8
27
37-38
321734
12
31
27
152225
1916165
15
87
1629
1723/24
12
12
23/24
211518
12
23/24
14
16
19
23/2423/24
1923/24
9
13
1
21
192222
12
18
9
142121
191920199
132022
Issue PageIssue Page
Neural networks in design of cold-formed steel members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Research update
Structural movementThe 1999 Athens earthquake: causes of damage notpredicted by structural concrete design methods . . . . . . . .
SubsidenceClimate change will exacerbate subsidence risk industrywarned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Suez Canal, EgyptCrossing the Suez Canal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SurveyingThe ‘bookend’ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
Suspension bridgesCrossing the Suez Canal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . View from the bridge: interview with Roger Evans . . . . .
SustainabilityConstruction of the Downland gridshell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gold Medal Address 2001: Values and change: benefit orproblem? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Timber: a sustainable material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SwayDesign of unbraced composite frames using the wind-moment method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TTendons
Inspection and repair of the M56 Thorley Lane post tensionbridge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tensile strengthSplitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TerracesThe ‘bookend’ effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thermal propertiesSetting a new agenda for sustainable construction: WessexWater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thin shellsScience Centre takes Glasgow into 21st century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Structural news
The World’s largest self-supporting enclosed space . . . . . Construction of the Downland gridshell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Enhancement of the structural performance of gluelaminated homegrown Sitka Spruce using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Timber: a sustainable material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Achieving durability of timber structures: an integratedapproach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TowersEngineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Integrated approach to structural maintenance . . . . . . . . .
Traffic loadsGateshead Millennium Bridge: a real eye-opener . . . . . . . Influence of reinforcement anchorage on the bending andshear capacity of bridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kingston Bridge strengthening: phase 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk sensitivity applied to arch bridge assessments: anintroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TrainingCreating engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Gold Medal AddressMeeting demand creatively. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Training for engineering business management . . . . . . . .
Transverse reinforcementSplitting stresses in concrete flanges of edge girders inbridge decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TreatmentTimber: a sustainable material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tunnelling2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonrybuildings caused by tunnelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The design of Westminster Station (Jubilee Line Extension) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
UUltimate limit state
A proposal for partial factors for soil pressures in BS 8110Design of unbraced composite frames using the wind-moment method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ultimate loadsTransverse behaviour of masonry arch bridges . . . . . . . . . .
Underground railwaysThe design of Westminster Station (Jubilee Line Extension) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Discussion
Fatigue of riveted bridge girders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VVaults
The design and construction of a masonry arch roof with fly-ash lime and gypsum block masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ViaductsWest Rail viaducts, Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VibrationAn investigation into crowd-induced vertical dynamic loadsusing available measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Engineering measurement and testing of land-basedstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Serviceability evaluation of floor vibrations induced bywalking loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Millennium Bridge, London: problems and solution. . The London Millennium footbridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Millennium Bridge, London . . . . . . . . . . . .– Discussion
WWalls
Applying moire photography to internal load distribution inarches and walls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .– Technical noteEnhancements to the resisting moment of unreinforcedmasonry walls due to shifts in the neutral axis position . . .
Westminster Pier, LondonThe British Airways London Eye: Part 5: Pier and impactprotection system. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Westminster Station, LondonThe design of Westminster Station (Jubilee Line Extension) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – Discussion
Wind loadsEngineering and art: the Spitfire sculpture . . . . . . . . . . . . . Parametric calibration of BS 6399: Part 2: 1997 (effectivedynamic pressures) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design of foundations for lighting columns with flangeplates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Global warming: issues for engineers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
World Trade Center, New York, USADesigning for security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . What future for tall buildings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Institution to review safety following American disaster . .
12
19
35
18
28
21
3527
18
16
21
33
30151734
14
14
34
35
14
22
1213
16135
1
17
8
11
9
179
6
23/24
12
7
218
2222
3
1
2
17
16
4
1514
192019
22
23
8
15
30
1510
25
2612
28
24
17
30
14
62525
2312
19
3319
11
2432
31
271813
17
12
21
15
7
21
13
215
17
1917
11
5
10
13
12
12117
817
17
723/24
18
1619
18
71022
10
17
Issue PageIssue Page