1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Eddie Haskel, pro seBebe Haskel, pro se

555 East Merry LanePhoenix, Arizona 85777

(623) 555-7777IN THE UNITED STATES DITRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eddie Haskel, pro se and

Bebe Haskel, pro se

Plaintiff,

Vs.BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, and/or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as PRES/CEO OF BAC HOME LOANS SERVICNG, LP, an ens legis being used to conceal fraud,JAMES F. TAYLOR and/or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as PRES. OF FIN.& ADMIN. OF RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., an ens legis being used to conceal fraud,BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, and/or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as PRES/CEO OF BANK OF AMERICA, an ens legis used to conceal fraud,ANGELO MAZILO, and/or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as PRES/CEO OF COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., an ens legis being used to conceal fraud,R.K. ARNOLD and/or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as PRES/CEO OF MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., an ens legis being used to conceal fraud,

JOHN VELLA and/or his successor, individually, and in his official capacity as PRES/CEO EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, an ens legis being used to conceal fraud,

BEAR STERNS and/or its successor, an ens legis being used to conceal fraud,

AND JOHN DOES (Investors) 1-10,000, Et al, Defendant.)

)

)

)

)

)

)Case no: CV-10-01000 GMS

JUDICIAL NOTICE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 4

NOTICE No. 4 (Assigned to Hon. G. More Snow)

COMES NOW, Eddie Haskel, pro se Bebe Haskel, pro se, (Hereafter Plaintiff), hereby submits the following JUDICIAL NOTICE.FOURTH JUDICIAL NOTICE:PLAINTIFF REFUSES TO PARTICIPATE IN DEFENDANTS FRUADLENT AND/OR CRIMINAL AND/OR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES:

There is no law that can or does require Plaintiff to participate in Defendants criminal and/or fraudulent and/or terrorist activities. In fact, Defendants fraudulent and/or criminal and/or terrorist activities have discharged all obligations and/or instruments in this matter, pursuant to, inter alia, the U.C.C. and Arizona Law.

Defendants often claim that the U.C.C. does not apply in these matters, which is a blatant obfuscation of the law. Arizona has accepted in totality the U.C.C. as it relates to ALL matters of and in commerce. Defendants often claim that U.C.C. does not apply in non-judicial foreclosures; such is simply a lawyers trick to confuse the issue. Of course the U.C.C. applies, but the presumption is that the lawyers have been honest and are in compliance. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, since Plaintiff has rebutted the fraudulent presumption that Defendants are in compliance with the U.C.C., Defendants MUST immediately Present and Exhibit for this Courts inspection the Original Promissory Note and prima facie evidence of Defendants authority to act, pursuant to, inter alia, U.C.C. 3-501(B)(2).

Defendants failure to adhere to the U.C.C. notwithstanding, Defendants fraud and criminal and terrorist activity has vitiated all purported obligations of Plaintiff as fraud vitiates everything according to the Supreme Court of the United States.

DATED: This 39th day of June, in the year, of our Lord, 2010. BY: ____________________________, agent

Eddie Haskel, pro se

Signed reserving all my rights at UCC 1-308

BY: ____________________________, agent

Bebe Haskel, pro se

Signed reserving all my rights at UCC 1-308

2