judicial recovery plan

Upload: mpxeri

Post on 01-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    1/253

    FINAL VERSION

    1

    PLAN FOR COURT-SUPERVISED REORGANIZATION

    OF ENEVA S.A. – UNDER COURT-SUPERVISED REORGANIZATION

    ENEVA S.A. – under Court-Supervised Reorganization, a corporation with head

    offices at Praia do Flamengo, nº 66, 9º andar, Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, CEP nº22.210-903, registered under Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ nº)

    04.423.567/0001-21, and ENEVA PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. –  under Court-

    Supervised Reorganization, a corporation with head offices at Praia do

    Flamengo, nº 66, Room 901 parte, Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, CEP 22.210-903,

    registered under Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ nº) 15.379.168/0001-27,

    hereafter referred to individually and respectively as “Eneva” and “Eneva

    Participações”, or jointly as “Companies Under Reorganization”,  present in the

    records of the court-supervised reorganization process, registered under nº

    0474961-48.2014.8.19.0001, currently pending before the 4th Commercial Court

    of the Capital of the State of Rio de Janeiro, the following plan for court-supervised

    reorganization, in compliance with the provision of article 53 of the LRJ (Court-

    Supervised Reorganization Law).

    1.  INTRODUCTION

    1.1.  Background. Eneva was formed in 2001, under the name MPX Energia S.A.,

    to operate with a focus on the generation and commercialization of energy,possessing complementary businesses in electrical generation, coal mining and the

    exploration and production of natural gas in Brazil and in other countries of South

    America.

    The company was the operational arm of the EBX Group in the energy generation

    and commercialization sector, and is currently the largest private generator of

    thermal energy in Brazil.

    In the context of a highly favorable economic scenario, as a means of capitalizing in

    order to develop its projects and obtain new sources of funding, in December 2007

    Eneva held a public share offering (IPO) in the New Market sector of the BM&F

    BOVESPA stock exchange, embarking on a new phase in Eneva's relationship with

    its shareholders and investors. Around one month later, the option for the

    subscription of a supplementary batch of ordinary shares granted to the

    coordinating banks was exercised. As a result of these two operations,

    approximately R$2 billion of funds were raised with new shareholders..

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    2/253

    FINAL VERSION

    2

    Spurred by the new investments, Eneva did not simply continue to pursue projects

    currently underway but embarked on the execution of other projects in the energy

    sector, both inside and outside Brazil - such as the Pecém II Thermoelectric Power

    Plant (Ceará), the construction of Thermoelectric Power Plants in the Parnaíba

    Basin (Maranhão), the largest thermal energy generation project in Chile(Termoelectrica Castilla) and the extraction of coal in Colombia.

    In order to obtain new sources of funding, from 2009 the Eneva Group contracted

    short-, medium- and long-term loans with financial institutions and development

    banks, for the development of new projects and the expansion of existing ventures.

    In 2011, through the issuance of bonds convertible into ordinary shares, Eneva

    also raised funds with BNDESPar, Gávea Investimentos and their then controller,

    Mr. Eike Batista, in the sum total of approximately R$1.4 billion, to be used on a

    priority basis to expand the exploration of natural gas in the Parnaíba Basin in the

    state of Maranhão, which process began the following year, and in the extraction of

    coal in Colombia. In the middle of 2012, 99.9% of these bonds were converted into

    shares in Eneva and the coal operations in Colombia were spun-off to a new

    company called CCX Carvão da Colômbia S.A., in which Eneva did not possess a

    stake.

    It is important to highlight that these funding measures, and those whichsucceeded them in the following years, were assumed under wholly normal market

    conditions and at leverage levels which were compatible with the evaluation of

    each project by the funders.

    In August of 2011, ANEEL approved the transference of the authorizations of the

    Parnaíba I TPP from Bertin Energia e Participações S.A. to Eneva, relating to energy

    projects contracted at the A-5 auction of 2008, totaling 450 average MW. The

    fourth and fifth turbine of this TPP received authorization to begin commercial

    operations on 12.04.2013, proceeding to generate 676 MW, the project ’s  having

    been financed by BNDES in the approximate value of R$671 million.

    Also in 2011, the Parnaíba II TPP, with a capacity of 517 MW, was victorious at the

    A-3 new energy auction and, in April 2013, Eneva informed the market that it had

    concluded the acquisition of the total stockholders' capital of Parnaíba III

    (formerly UTE MC2 Nova Venécia), consolidating the Parnaiba Complex as the

    largest “gas to wire” project in Brazil, where the power plant s are strategically

    located over the gas fields and under the transmission lines.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    3/253

    FINAL VERSION

    3

    At the start of 2012, Eneva announced its intention to form a joint venture with the

    E.ON Group, one of the largest private energy and gas groups in the world. The aim

    was simple and clear: the companies could exploit their complementary activities

    and characteristics to accelerate the growth and development of a comprehensive

    energy project in Brazil.

    Thus, in April 2012, the definitive documents of this operation were signed, by

    which Eneva raised R$1 billion through an increase in subscribed capital by DD

    Brazil Holdings S.à.r.l., an investment vehicle controlled by the German company

    E.ON SE, which holds interests in the companies of the Eneva Group, the object of

    the investment. Following this increase, E.ON attained an interest of 11.75 in

    Eneva. On 17.04.2012, Eneva signed the definitive agreements for the formation of

    a joint venture with E.ON, which was concluded on 25.05.2012, in the form of the

    company Eneva Participações S.A, which is also under court-supervised

    reorganization.

    The structure of Eneva Participações was conceived with the aim of optimizing the

    complementarities of the two groups. According to the expectations shared by

    both, this partnership could lead to the efficient development, execution and

    operation of energy generating projects with a total capacity of 20 GW, including

    thermal and renewable generation. The management of Eneva Participações

    combines high profile and experienced international executives from E.ON and agroup of executives from Eneva with a profound knowledge of the Brazilian

    electrical sector.

    In May 2013, following the verification or waiver of all the precedent conditions

    foreseen in an investment accord signed months previously, E.ON acquired

    141,544,637 shares issued by Eneva and held by Mr. Eike Batista and by certain

    shareholders, who held share options, representing 24.47% of its capital. As a

    result of this operation, E.ON proceeded to hold approximately 38% of Eneva's

    capital, having signed a Shareholders' Agreement with Mr. Eike Batista to exercise

    shared control. Moreover, on May 12th 2014, the implementation of an increase of

    private capital was announced, regarding Eneva, in the value of up to

    R$1,500,000.00 (one billion, five hundred million reais). The price per share

    regarding this increase was fixed at R$1.27 (one real and twenty seven cents), as

    approved by Eneva’s board of directors. E.ON undertook to subscribe part of the

    shares, in the limited sum of R$120,000,000.00 (one hundred and twenty million

    reais). As a result of the share subscription by E.ON, the latter proceeded to hold

    approximately 42% of Eneva’s capital and, furthermore, to share control with Mr.Eike Batista.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    4/253

    FINAL VERSION

    4

    Eneva has always sought to pursue economically viable projects, with a view to

    ensuring the highest standards of efficiency - in a creative and innovative manner,

    supported by cutting-edge technology - without neglecting its socio-environmentalcommitments.

    Moreover, it possesses a team of associates who are highly trained and whose

    record is distinguished by the capacity to integrate activities, eliminating

    production costs, signing and respecting partnerships and identifying good

    business opportunities.

    Eneva operates under the highest standards of corporate governance, and is listed

    on the New Market of the BM&F BOVESPA stock exchange, which, in itself,

    indicates that its operations are characterized by outstanding levels of

    management. Each of the company's actions is —  and always has been — 

    profoundly and broadly disclosed to the market with the maximum transparency.

    It was in this manner that, in a short time, the Eneva Group emerged in the market

    as one of the most important companies in the energy sector, principally as the

    largest private company in the thermal generation sector, whose growth is so

    essential to Brazil within a secure energy matrix, as has been made clear by recentevents. If, on the one hand, recent events concerning atypically low rainfall levels

    underlined the importance of Eneva, as well as of the generation of thermal energy in

    general, on the other, the pressure on Eneva was increased, notably by the high

    unavailability charge imposed on Eneva through the increase in the DSP (Differences

    Settlement Price), resulting in material negative impacts for the Eneva Group.

    However, external and unforeseeable factors, indicated in clause 1.3, meant that

    some projects underway had their conclusions delayed, altering projections

    concerning the start up of energy generation, as well as the operation's

    profitability program. These factors had negative impacts on the operational

    companies controlled directly or indirectly by the Companies Under

    Reorganization, which ultimately adversely affected their cash flow, preventing

    them from punctually honoring their payments to suppliers and financial

    institutions. As a result of the combination of these delays and the exceptionally high

    DSP prices, the Companies Under Reorganization were exposed to severe losses and

    impacts on their cash balances which, collectively, had negative consequences for the

    companies.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    5/253

    FINAL VERSION

    5

    Despite being pure holding companies —  and, thus, without the capacity to

    generate income through their own activities —, Eneva and Eneva Participações’ 

    debt to their creditors has risen to a total of more than R$2.3 billion, which has

    made it impossible to pay it off on the conditions originally contracted, for thereasons which will be given below.

    The crisis has affected Eneva and Eneva Participações and, to some extent, the

    operational companies in which it has an interest, although the economic-financial

    circumstances are particular. Nevertheless, the crisis should soon pass, as the

    projects developed by the operational companies are substantial and will tend to

    become more profitable in the medium/long term. Furthermore, the Companies

    Under Reorganization have concluded all their principal projects and construction

    activities in such a manner as to prevent their exposure to future risks regarding

    constructions, postponements and delays, as in the past.

    In the light of the economic-financial crisis faced by the companies under

    reorganization, it has become necessary to adopt measures essential to the

    maintenance of Eneva’s  and Eneva Participações’ activities, including the

    renegotiation of their debts with creditors, in accordance with this Plan.

    1.2.  Corporate and operational structure. The corporate and operational

    structure of the Eneva Group is represented in the corporate organogram attached

    to this Plan as  Annex 1.2. The Eneva Group is structured based on the holding

    company Eneva, a public corporation with shares traded on the stock exchange,

    whose social object is the generation, distribution and commercialization of

    electrical energy and interest, as a partner, member or shareholder, in the capital

    of other companies, in Brazil and abroad.

    The Eneva Group possesses diversified operations in the electrical energy

    generation and commercialization sectors, with complementary businesses in the

    exploration and production of natural gas. Its energy generation base is focused on

    thermal sources (coal, natural gas and diesel oil), and it also develops

    complementary sources, such as solar energy and wind generation projects.

    In Brazil, the activities pursued by the operational companies directly or indirectly

    controlled by Eneva are distributed throughout various Brazilian states.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    6/253

    FINAL VERSION

    6

    The figure below shows the focuses of operation and the geographical positions of

    the ventures and projects (the red marks indicate the ventures in activity or under

    construction and the blue marks the projects in operation);

    1.3. 

    The causes which led to the crisis experienced by the companies underreorganization directly impacted the cash flow of the operational companies,

    causing the cash of the companies under reorganization to be drastically affected.

    One of the factors which dramatically affected the cash situation of the companies

    being reorganized was the financial crisis of the Maire Tecnimont Group, which

    belonged to the MABE Brasil Consortium, which signed an EPC contract with Eneva

    for the construction of the Pecém I, Pecém II and Itaqui Thermoelectric Power

    Plants. The crisis in the Italian group prevented the MABE Consortium from

    executing the contracts satisfactorily, which is why it became delinquent in

    relation to the obligations contracted with its subcontractors and with Eneva itself,

    causing an accumulated delay of 529 days at the Pecém I TPP and 650 days at the

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    7/253

    FINAL VERSION

    7

    Itaqui TPP. The delays had damaging consequences for the companies under

    reorganization, inasmuch as the time of exposure of these companies to fixed and

    variable costs was increased and the date for initiating the generation of income

    was postponed, preventing regular and punctual compliance with the obligations

    assumed with the suppliers and banks.

    Elsewhere, the enormous financial exposure of the operational companies,

    deriving from the need to buy ballast, also had a severe impact on the cash

    situation of the companies undergoing reorganization. Once the date of energy

    generation was postponed, as a means of complying with the contracts regulated

    by ANEEL, the operational companies in which the companies undergoing

    reorganization have an interest were obliged to acquire energy in the spot market

    precisely when its (DSP) price reached the highest levels of the past 13 years. The

    current energy price levels are mainly the result of atypically low rainfall levels

    over a long period of time and, consequently, of the critically low levels of the

    reservoirs, which factors have overloaded the power plants in Brazil and caused

    the price of energy to reach its highest levels of the past 13 years. While this

    situation reveals a general need for dispatchable energy generation and, thus, for

    companies with a portfolio of plants like Eneva’s, the same scenario –   combined

    with the regulations and their erroneous interpretation, as will be explained below

    – has exposed the Companies Under Reorganization to severe losses and a need for

    cash.

    Some of the operational companies suffered heavy sanctions from ANEEL, as a

    result of the use of erroneous methods for measuring the so-called unavailability

    periods of the plants (ADOMP). The new calculation method used, unlike that

    foreseen in the contracts which compose the bid notices and also foreseen in

    ANNEL RESOLUTION n° 169/2005, resulted in the imposition of sanctions in the

    order of hundreds of millions of reais, ensuring that these operational companies

    did not generate satisfactory results, frustrating the receipt of income by the

    companies undergoing reorganization. This matter is currently the subject of

    litigation through actions nos.  184-82.2014.4.01.3400 (action filed by Itaqui and

    Pecém I, currently pending at the 15th Federal Court of the Judicial District of the

    Federal District) and 0043145-38.2014.4.01.3400 (action filed by Pecém II,

    Parnaíba I and Parnaíba III, currently pending at the 7th Federal Court of the

    Judicial District of the Federal District), with initial rulings from the judicial branch

    which were favorable to the companies controlled by the companies under

    reorganization. In this regard, it is important to stress that Itaqui and Pecém I have

    already been reimbursed sums that were unduly overpaid (approximatelyR$108,000,000.00 and R$260,000,000.00, respectively) in November 2014.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    8/253

    FINAL VERSION

    8

    It is also worth registering the fact that, on 25.08.2014, the Pecém I Thermoelectric

    Power Plant recorded a three-phase short-circuit in one its turbines, which

    resulted in the disconnection of all the generators. The plant operated at only half

    capacity until the beginning of December 2014, for a period of 87 days. Thisprevented it from generating the contracted energy (forcing it to buy ballast at

    extremely high prices) and also made it subject to new contingencies for

    reimbursement due to unavailability from January 2016 for a period of 60 months,

    with such reimbursement being covered by insurance for loss of profits from the

    61st day until the 87th day.

    In addition to this, the companies undergoing reorganization were affected by the

    crisis of the OGX Group, as all the gas-fired plants of the Parnaíba Thermoelectric

    Complex are supplied by Parnaíba Gás Natural (the former OGX Maranhão Petróleo

    e Gás S.A.). The lack of investments in Parnaíba Gás Natural resulted in additional

    delays at the Parnaíba II Thermoelectric Plant and in problems in the regulatory

    sphere, which forced the companies undergoing reorganization to bear high

    unscheduled costs.

    In addition to the above factors, which were completely beyond the control of the

    companies under reorganization, and which caused energy-generation starting

    dates to be postponed, the companies under reorganization signed variouscontracts with financial institutions to finance their energy generating and trading

    projects which currently total approximately R$2.3 billion. The group's total debt,

    taking into account the debts contracted with the operational companies, amounts

    to around R$10 billion.

    Finally, the companies under reorganization also granted guarantees for loans

    from operational companies, without, however, possessing any cash-generating

    activity of their own to honor the payments which may be required of them.

    1.4.  Previously adopted measures. In order to restore its financial health, in

    recent months, the companies under reorganization have embarked on the project

    of internal reorganization, implanting more appropriate management practices

    and adopting measures designed to rebalance its cash flow.

    In order to reduce fixed costs, they have sought to reduce their management

    structures and pare down their workforces. They have simultaneously initiated theprocess of renegotiating their debts and contracts with financial creditors and

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    9/253

    FINAL VERSION

    9

    suppliers, scaled down their original business plans and proceeded to adopt a

    series of management practices designed to control the cash situation.

    It may be seen, for example, that as a result of operational problems and others in

    the regulatory sphere which affected the cash balances of the operationalcompanies, Eneva saw its borrowing grow substantially between 2013 and 2014.

    Measures were then put into place to obtain new funding, as a way of extending

    Eneva's debt and allowing the process of deleveraging in the years 2014 and 2015.

    This was made possible by tough negotiations with the main creditors, whose aim

    was to reduce the level of borrowing of the companies under reorganization.

    Regarding the debt with suppliers, the companies under reorganization have

    already achieved success in renegotiating the payment of approximately R$460

    million.

    Simultaneously, the criteria for the application of sanctions by ANEEL have been

    challenged, and legal judgments have been obtained (though not yet res judicata)

    in favor of the companies Itaqui, Pecém I, Pecém II, Parnaíba I and Parnaíba III for

    the regulatory penalties to be applied taking into account the contracted criteria,

    and not the new and inappropriate calculation methodology put into practice by

    ANEEL. These favorable judgments represent a reimbursement for the Eneva

    Group of approximately R$300 million, without taking into account the possibility

    of sums already paid being subsequently charged in accordance with ANEEL'sdeterminations based on criteria whose inappropriateness the judicial branch has

    already recognized.

    In addition to this, since March 2014, the companies under reorganization have

    adopted other measures to balance their cash, through the search for investors, a

    process which is still underway. Also since March, they have been making every

    effort to seek parties interested in acquiring certain assets, having implemented

    rigorous processes to ensure that the best proposal is chosen.

    Moreover, in order to increase the availability of cash and strengthen its capital

    and balance sheet structure, in May 2014 Eneva signed an agreement with E-ON

    and a group of funder creditors which provided for (i) an increase in private

    capital of up to R$1.5 billion, to be carried out in 2 stages; (ii) the sale of 50% to

    100% of its interest in Pecém II through the initiation of an open and competitive

    process for interested investors; (iii) the granting of a bridging loan in the sum of

    R$100 million; (iv) the granting of a long term loan in the sum of R$150 million for

    Pecém II, as well as (v) the extension by 5 years of the maturity date of certainloans.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    10/253

    FINAL VERSION

    10

    Throughout recent months, in the context of the efforts made by the management

    of the companies undergoing reorganization to consolidate their financial stability,

    significant advances have been made, in particular (i) an increase in Eneva's

    private capital, in the total of approximately R$175 million; (ii) the sale of 50% ofthe shares issued by Pecém II and loans in the sum of R$408 milhões; (iii) the

    alteration of the form of verifying and paying for the unavailability (ADOMP) of the

    plants and the reimbursement to Eneva of the excess sums paid by the

    thermoelectric power plants Pecém I and Itaqui, totalling over R$360 million; (iv)

    the signing of an agreement with ANEEL to modify the obligations for the supply of

    energy by the Parnaíba II power plant, together with the conclusion of the works

    and start of test operations at the cited plant; (v) the signing of a contract for the

    sale of Eneva's interest in Pecém I to EDP –  Energias do Brasil S.A. (“EDP”) for

    R$300 million; (vi) significant improvements in the availability of the operations of

    the plants controlled by the companies undergoing reorganization; (vii) a

    significant reduction in the operational costs of the companies undergoing

    reorganization, among other measures.

    It is important to stress that, since the first signs of the crisis began to appear, the

    companies undergoing reorganization —  through their executives and, more

    recently, with the assistance of renowned consultants specializing in the

    restructuring of companies in crisis —  have made every effort to stabilize theircash situation. As may be seen above, important results have been obtained, which

    have prevented the Eneva Group from suffering further losses.

    1.5.  Economic and operational viability. The financial crisis currently

    experienced by the companies undergoing reorganization is the product of a series

    of factors which occurred in recent years and which adversely affected their cash

    flow, preventing the continuity of punctual payment of all their obligations to their

    suppliers and financial institutions.

    Despite the fact that they are experiencing a challenging time of financial

    difficulties, the companies undergoing reorganization are viable, profitable entities

    which possess much added value in their assets and technologies. In addition to

    this, they are unquestionably sources for the generation of tens of thousands of

    direct and indirect jobs and the payment of substantial taxes. The companies

    undergoing reorganization are the principal private investors in Brazil in the

    important activity of thermal energy generation —  without which the already

    grave current situation of the Brazilian energy sector would undoubtedly reach

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    11/253

    FINAL VERSION

    11

    even more critical levels —, operating in areas which suffer significant regional

    imbalances.

    The companies undergoing reorganization hold interests (wholly-owned or with

    partners) in thermoelectric plants in the states of Amapá, Ceará and Maranhãowith high production capacity. Each TPP is equipped with turbines and other

    highly valuable assets, which means that these operational units, in which the

    companies undergoing reorganization have significant holdings, possess equally

    significant added value.

    To obtain the right to sell the energy produced by each of these TPPs, the

    companies which control them were victorious at New Energy Auctions held by

    the CCEE since the year 2007, which allows them to sign contracts with periods of

    validity from 15 to 20 years, with a guarantee of income at significant levels. The

    contracts signed are of long duration and allow for the receipt of a fixed annual

    income and a variable income. These resources are substantial and compatible

    with the significance and scale of the projects undertaken by these companies,

    with the TPPs controlled by the Eneva Group predicted to enjoy a fixed income of

    R$2.3 billion for the year 2015.

    As a consequence, the companies undergoing reorganization should benefit from

    the results of each of these surplus operations, inasmuch as they proceed toreceive the dividends due to them in their capacity as direct or indirect

    shareholders.

    2.  DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF INTERPRETATION

    2.1.  Definitions. The terms and expressions which appear in lowercase letters,

    whenever mentioned in the plan, will have the meanings attributed to them in this

    clause 2. These terms will be used, where appropriate, in their singular or plural

    form, and in the masculine or feminine form, without losing the meaning assigned

    to them.

    2.1.1.  “Controlling Shareholders”: are, collectively, Eike Batista and E.ON. 

    2.1.2.  “Bankruptcy Trustee": is Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Consultores

    Ltda., appointed by the Reorganization Court  , as per the terms of

    Chapter II, Section III, of the LRJ, or whoever may replace it fromtime to time.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    12/253

    FINAL VERSION

    12

    2.1.3.  "Verification of the Percentage Reductions of the Unsecured Claims":

    the procedure during the creditors' meeting when voting on the plan

    takes place, by which (i) it will be verified whether the weighted

    average of the proposed percentage reductions of the unsecuredclaims informed by the unsecured creditors achieves the percentage

    or not of the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims; and, if not,

    (ii) the unsecured creditors who remain below the weighted average

    obtained will be advised that the respective proposed percentage

    reduction of the unsecured claim may be increased, at the exclusive

    discretion of the companies under reorganization, to allow the

    attainment of the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims. Once

    the procedure for verifying the reduction percentages of the

    unsecured claims has been concluded, the respective definitive

    percentage reductions of the unsecured claims will be determined

    and, for each unsecured creditor entitled to the privilege foreseen in

    clause 5.3.5, it will be informed whether they wish to exercise, or

    not, the right to the optional increase in the definitive percentage

    reductions of their unsecured claims. For the purposes of clarity,

    regarding each unsecured creditor whose claim exceeds

    R$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand reais), the calculation

    for the verification of the percentage reductions of the unsecuredclaims will consist, of the weighted average obtained from (i) the

    multiplication of (a) the proposed percentage reduction of the

    unsecured claim informed by the respective unsecured creditor by

    (b) the value of the respective unsecured claim and (ii) the division

    (a) of this figure by (b) the total value of the unsecured claims

    (following the deduction of the R$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty

    thousand reais) per unsecured creditor paid in accordance with clause

    5.3.1 ) as per the formula described and exemplified in Annex 2.1.3.

    2.1.4.  “ANEEL”: Brazilian Electrical Energy Agency.

    2.1.5.  “Anniversary”: is the date which corresponds to the 360th day after

    the Date of Ratification.

    2.1.6.  “ANP”: Brazilian Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency.

    2.1.7. 

    "Investment in specie": the sum equivalent to the subscription andpayment in specie of shares in the context of the capital increase. For

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    13/253

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    14/253

    FINAL VERSION

    14

    corresponding to the global value of the assets which may be

    invested in Eneva's capital in order to pay for the new shares. For the

    purposes of this plan, we estimate the value of the capital increase at

    R$3,300,000,000.00 (three billion, three hundred million reais, to be

    subscribed and paid for by the shareholders, unsecured creditors,investors and by the owners of other property and rights which may

    be accepted by Eneva for the purposes of subscription/underwriting

    (according to their own exclusive criteria of convenience and

    opportuneness, and always with reference to the aims of the plan),in

    observance of the following reference values by mode, which may

    vary, up or down, depending (i) on the number of Eneva's

    shareholders who exercise their respective preemptive and/or

    priority right, depending on the case, in the subscription of the

    capital increase and the respective form of subscription adopted: (ii)

    on the volume of capitalization of the claims by the unsecured

    creditors; and (iii) on the approval at the shareholders' meeting of

    the evaluation report regarding each of the assets owned by the

    shareholders, investors and/or unsecured creditors who opt to

    participate in the capital increase through underwriting with the

    assets.

    Form of participation

    in the capital increase

    Estimated reference values for thepurposes of participation in the

    capital increase

    (in millions of R$)

    Investment in specie 600

    Capitalization of the

    claims1,100

    Underwriting with assets 1,300

    Total 3,000

    2.1.12.  “BNDES”: is the Brazilian Bank of Social and Economic Development.

    2.1.13.  “BNDESPar”: is BNDES Participações S.A. – BNDESPar, a corporation

    with head offices at Centro Empresarial Parque Cidade, Setor

    Comercial Sul – SCS, Quadra 9, Torre C, 12º andar, Brasília/DF, and a

    service office and tax domicile at Avenida República do Chile, nº 100-

    parte, Centro, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, registered under Corporate

    Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 00.383.281/0001-09.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    15/253

    FINAL VERSION

    15

    2.1.14.  “CADE”: Administrative Council of Economic Defense. 

    2.1.15.  “Capitalization of Claims”: is the procedure, regarding each

    unsecured creditor, by which up to 45% (forty five percent) of the

    value of the unsecured claims (following the deduction of theR$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand reais) paid in

    accordance with the terms foreseen in clause 5.3.1, per unsecured

    creditor - will be converted, in the sphere of the capital increase, as

    per the terms foreseen in clauses 4.4  and 5.3  of this Plan and in

    accordance with article 171, item 2, of the business corporation act

    and the other applicable legal provisions,. 

    2.1.16.  “CDI”: is the variation of the average reference rates of the Interbank

    Deposits (CDI Extragrupo) verified and published by the CETIP on its

    webpage (www.cetip.com.br), expressed as a percentage per year. 

    2.1.17.  “Precedent Conditions”: are the suspensive conditions for the

    realization of the capital increase and for the implementation of the

    other provisions contained in this plan as foreseen in clause 4.1.

    2.1.18. 

    “Claims”: are the claims and obligations held by the creditors againstEneva and Eneva Participações, whether outstanding or not yet due,

    materialized or contingent, liquid or illiquid, the object or not of a

    legal dispute or arbitral procedure, existing on the request date or

    whose taxable event is prior to or coincides with the request date,

    and which may or may not be subject to the effects of the plan.

    2.1.19.  “Capitalized Claims”: correspond  to the fraction of the unsecured

    claims which are the object of the capitalization of the claims as

    described in clause 2.1.15. 

    2.1.20.  “Secured Claims”: are the claims assured by security interest (such as

    a pledge or mortgage) granted by one of the companies under

    reorganization, up to the limit value of the respective asset, as per

    the terms of article 41, item II, of the LRJ.

    2.1.21.  “Pre-bankruptcy Claims”: are the claims held by the pre-bankruptcy

    creditors.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    16/253

    FINAL VERSION

    16

    2.1.22.  "Micro-Business and Small Business Claims": are the claims held by

    micro-business and small business creditors.

    2.1.23.  “First Priority Claims”: are the claims held by first priority creditors.

    2.1.24.  "Suretyship, Accommodation, or Joint and Several Obligation

    Claims": are the claims deriving from operations contracted directly

    by subsidiaries of the companies under reorganization

    headquartered in Brazil, through operations in which the companies

    under reorganization feature as sureties, accommodation parties,

    joint and several debtors or in any other codebtor relationship

    regarding the payment of the debt contracted directly by one their

    subsidiaries headquartered in Brazil.

    2.1.25.  “Unsecured Claims”: are the unsecured claims as foreseen in articles

    41, item III, and 83, item VI, of the LRJ.

    2.1.26.  “Labor Claims”: are the claims and rights deriving from labor

    legislation or workplace accidents, as per the terms of Article 41,

    item I, of the LRJ, and the claims and rights consisting of lawyers' fees

    recognized by the companies under reorganization or fixed by a legal

    judgment which has become res judicata by the date of the claim.

    2.1.27.  “Creditors”: are individuals or legal entities which hold claims,

    whether or not they are included in the list of creditors.

    2.1.28.  “Secured Creditors”: are the pre-bankruptcy creditors who hold

    secured claims.

    2.1.29.  “Pre-bankruptcy Creditors”: are creditors who hold claims and rights

    which may be altered by this plan, as per the terms of the LRJ.

    2.1.30.  “First Priority Creditors”:  are creditors who own claims which are

    not subject to court-supervised reorganization, as per the terms of

    articles 49, §§ 3º and 4º, and 67 of the LRJ.

    2.1.31.  “Funding Creditors”: are the creditors who opt to grant new funding,

    as per the terms foreseen in clause 6a of this plan. The fact that a

    creditor may opt to participate in the capital increase through an

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    17/253

    FINAL VERSION

    17

    investment in specie and/or underwriting with the assets will not

    make it a funding creditor.

    2.1.32.  "Micro-Business and Small Business Creditors": are creditors

    incorporated as micro-businesses and small businesses, as definedby Supplementary Law No. 123, of December 14th 2006.

    2.1.33.  "Suretyship, Accommodation, or Joint and Several Obligation

    Creditors": are the holders of claims deriving from operations

    contracted directly by subsidiaries of the companies under

    reorganization headquartered in Brazil, through operations in which

    the companies under reorganization appear as sureties,

    accommodation parties, joint and several debtors or in any other co-

    debtor relationship regarding the payment of the debt contracted

    directly by one their subsidiaries headquartered in Brazil.

    2.1.34.  “Unsecured Creditors”: are the pre-bankruptcy creditors who hold

    unsecured claims.

    2.1.35.  "Late Creditors": are creditors who, due to the filing of late claims on

    an administrative or judicial basis, were included by the bankruptcy

    trustee in the list of creditors after its publication in the officialgazette, in accordance with the provision of article 7, item 2 of the

    LRJ.

    2.1.36.  “Labor Creditors”: are the pre-bankruptcy creditors who hold labor

    claims.

    2.1.37.  “Ratification Date”: The date of the publication of the judicial

    ratification of the plan proffered by the court of reorganization,

    against which there is no interlocutory appeal pending judgment of

    the merits in the State Appellate Court of Rio de Janeiro, in

    accordance with the terms of article 59 of the LRJ.

    2.1.38.  “Request Date”: 09/12/2014, the date on which the request for

    court-supervised reorganization was filed by the companies under

    reorganization.

    2.1.39. 

    “Working Day”: for the purposes of this plan, a working day will beany day other than Saturday, Sunday or a national or municipal

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    18/253

    FINAL VERSION

    18

    holiday in the cities of São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro or on which, for

    any reason, the banks are not open in the cities of São Paulo or Rio de

    Janeiro.

    2.1.40. 

    "Eike Batista": is Mr. Eike Fuhrken Batista, registered underIndividual Taxpayer Identification Number (CPF/MF) 664.976.807-

    30 and bearer of identify card nº 05.541.92-2, resident and domiciled

    in the city of Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, with offices at

    Praia do Flamengo, nº 154, 10º andar, and his controlled companies,

    which have a direct or indirect interest in Eneva.  

    2.1.41.  “Eneva”: is Eneva S.A. - under court-supervised reorganization, a

    corporation with head offices at Praia do Flamengo, nº 66, 9º andar,

    Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, CEP nº 22.210-903, registered under

    Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 04.423.567/0001-21. 

    2.1.42.  “Eneva Participações”: is Eneva Participações S.A. - undergoing

    court-supervised reorganization, a corporation with head offices at

    Praia do Flamengo, nº 66, 9º andar, Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, CEP

    22.210-030, registered under Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ)

    15.379.168/0001-27, resulting from the joint venture formed

    between E.ON and Eneva. 

    2.1.43.  “E.ON”: is DD Brazil Holdings S.àR.L. (a company incorporated under

    the laws of Luxemburg, with head offices at Boulevard Prince Henri,

    nº 17, 1.724, Luxemburg), an investment vehicle controlled by the

    Germany company E.ON SE which holds interests in the companies

    of the Eneva Group which is the object of the investment.

    2.1.44.  “Shared Guarantees”: are the part of the accounts receivable of the

    R$300,000,000.00 (three hundred million reais) deriving from the

    alienation, by Eneva, of its entire interest in the capital of Pecém I in

    favor of EDP – Energias do Brasil S.A., in accordance with the terms

    of the contract for the purchase and sale of shares, a copy of which

    forms  Annex 7.1  of this plan. These accounts receivable may be

    shared with the funding creditors, under the same conditions of

    seniority, as per the terms foreseen in this plan and in accordance

    with the contractual instrument(s) which may be signed for this

    purpose between the funding creditors and Eneva. 

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    19/253

    FINAL VERSION

    19

    2.1.45.  “Eneva Group”: the group composed of the companies which are

    directly or indirectly controlled by Eneva, in accordance with the

    corporate organogram attached to this plan as Annex 1.2.

    2.1.46. 

    “Judicial Ratification of the Plan”: is the judicial decision proffered bythe court of reorganization which grants the court-supervised

    reorganization, as per the terms of article 58, head provision, and/or

    article 58, Item1º, of the LRJ. 

    2.1.47.  “ICVM 476/09”: is Instruction n.º 476, of the Securities and Exchange

    Commission, of January 16th 2009.

    2.1.48.  "Investor": is any individual or legal entity which decides to

    participate in the capital increase through an investment in specie

    and/or underwriting with the assets, in the form foreseen in this

    plan and in accordance with the other applicable legal provisions.

    2.1.49.  “Itaqui”: is Itaqui Geração de Energia S.A., a corporation with head

    offices at Avenida dos Portugueses s/n, módulo G BR 135, São

    Luís/MA, CEP nº 65.085-582, registered under Corporate Taxpayer

    Number (CNPJ) 08.219.477/0001-74.

    2.1.50.  “Court of Reorganization”: is the 4th Commercial Court of the Judicial

    District of the Capital of the State of Rio de Janeiro.  

    2.1.51.  “Reports”: are the economic-financial reports which demonstrate the

    economic viability of the companies under reorganization and

    evaluate their goods and assets, as per the terms of article 53, III, of

    the LRJ, attached to this plan as Annex 2.1.51. 

    2.1.52. 

    “Business Corporation Act ”: is Federal Law nº 6.404, of December

    15th 1976. 

    2.1.53.  “LRJ (Court-Supervised Reorganization Act)”: is Federal Law nº

    11.101, of February 9th 2005. 

    2.1.54.  “List of Creditors”: Consolidated list of creditors of the companies

    under reorganization drafted by the bankruptcy trustee and

    amended from time to time by the res judicata  judicial or arbitraljudgments which recognized the new pre-bankruptcy claims or

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    20/253

    FINAL VERSION

    20

    altered the legitimacy, classification or value of the pre-bankruptcy

    claims already recognized.

    2.1.55.  “New Shares”: are the ordinary, registered, book-entry shares

    without nominal value which will be issued by Eneva in the contextof the capital increase, and delivered to the respective subscriber,

    free and unencumbered of any burden. The issuance cost of each

    new share will be determined and approved at Eneva’s shareholders’

    meeting, which we assert, for the purposes of this plan, will be

    R$0.15 (fifteen cents), fixed in accordance with the terms of article

    170 of the business corporation act, and in observance of the

    provision of clause 4.11 of this plan. 

    2.1.56.  “New Funds”: is the money to be granted to Eneva by the funding

    creditors, as per the terms provided for in the plan.

    2.1.57.  “Parnaíba Gás Natural”: is Parnaíba Gás Natural S.A. (formerly OGX

    Maranhão Petróleo e Gás S.A.), a corporation with head offices at

    Praia de Botafogo, nº 228, Ala A, 13º andar, Botafogo, Rio de

    Janeiro/RJ, CEP 22.250-906, registered under Corporate Taxpayer

    Number (CNPJ) 11.230.122/0001-90. 

    2.1.58.  “Parnaíba I”: is Parnaíba I Geração de Energia S.A., a corporation with

    head offices at Estrada de Acesso a BR 135/Km 277, Santo Antônio

    dos Lopes/MA, CEP nº 65.730-000, registered under Corporate

    Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 11.744.699/0001-10;

    2.1.59.  “Parnaíba II”:  is Parnaíba II Geração de Energia S.A., a corporation

    with head offices at Estrada de Acesso a BR 135/Km 277, Santo

    Antônio dos Lopes/MA, CEP nº 65.730-000, registered under

    Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 14.578.002/0001-77.

    2.1.60.  “Parnaíba III”:  is Parnaíba III Geração de Energia S.A., a corporation

    with head offices at Estrada de Acesso a BR 135/Km 277, Santo

    Antônio dos Lopes/MA, CEP nº 65.730-000, registered under

    Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 10.536.701/0001-01.

    2.1.61.  “Parnaíba IV”: is Parnaíba IV Geração de Energia S.A., a corporation

    with head offices at Estrada de Acesso a BR 135/Km 277, Santo

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    21/253

    FINAL VERSION

    21

    Antônio dos Lopes/MA, CEP nº 65.730-000, registered under

    Corporate Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 15.842.091/0001-80.

    2.1.62.  “Plan”: This is  the plan of court-supervised reorganization, as

    amended, modified or altered.

    2.1.63.  “Pecém I”: is the Porto do Pecém Geração de Energia S.A., a

    corporation with head offices at Rodovia CE-085, KM 37,5, Complexo

    Industrial e Portuário de Pecém, Caixa Postal 11, São Gonçalo do

    Amarante/CE, CEP 62.670-000, registered under Corporate

    Taxpayer Number (CNPJ) 08.976.495/0001-09.

    2.1.64.  “Pecém II”: is Pecém II Geração de Energia S.A., a corporation with

    head offices at Rua Marcos Macedo, nº 1.333, sala 2.118, Aldeota,

    Fortaleza/CE, CEP 60.150-190, registered under Corporate Taxpayer

    Number (CNPJ) 10.471.487/0001-44. 

    2.1.65.  “Definitive Percentage Reduction of the Unsecured Claim": will be, in

    relation to each unsecured claim, (i) the same proposed percentage

    reduction of the unsecured claim, if this is equal to or greater than

    the minimum reduction percentage of the unsecured claims; or (ii)

    the same proposed percentage reduction of the unsecured claims, inthe event that, during the verification of the percentage reductions of

    the unsecured claims, it is determined that the minimum reduction

    of the unsecured claims has been reached or (iii) the proposed

    percentage reduction of the unsecured claim potentially increased, at

    the exclusive discretion of the companies under reorganization, to

    achieve the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims, in

    accordance with the procedure for verifying the reduction

    percentages of the unsecured claims described in clause 5.3.2.4.

    2.1.66.  “Proposed Percentage Reduction of the Unsecured Claim”:  is,

    regarding each unsecured creditor, any percentage from a minimum

    of 30% (thirty percent) to a maximum of 45% (forty five percent) of

    the value of the unsecured claim (following the discount of

    R$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand reais) paid in

    accordance with clause 5.3.1 by the unsecured creditor), in

    observance of the provision of clause 5.3.5 of this plan, which must

    be informed by the respective unsecured creditor during the

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    22/253

    FINAL VERSION

    22

    creditors' meeting at which the plan is to be voted, as per the terms

    and conditions hereby established.

    2.1.67.  “Lock -Up Period”: corresponds to the period of six months counted

    from the date of ratification of the increase of capital by ENEVA’sboard of directors, during which time the new shares held by the

    unsecured creditors will be subject to the restrictions foreseen in

    clause 4.11 of this plan.

    2.1.68.  “Court-supervised reorganization”: is the process of court-

    supervised reorganization filed by Eneva and Eneva Participações on

    09/12/2014, registered in the records under nº 0474961-

    48.2014.8.19.0001 and assigned to the 4th Commercial Court of the

    Judicial District of the Capital of the State of Rio de Janeiro.

    2.1.69.  “Companies under court-supervised reorganization”: they are Eneva

    and Eneva Participações.

    2.1.70.  "Minimum Reduction of the Unsecured Claims": is the minimum

    reduction of the unsecured claims as described in clause 3.2.1 of this

    plan.

    2.1.71.  “Unconverted Balance of the Unsecured Claims”: corresponds, in

    relation to each unsecured creditor, to the eventual balance of the

    value of the unsecured claims following (i) the deduction of the sum

    of R$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand reais), to be paid

    in accordance with the provision of clause 5.3.1,  per unsecured

    creditor, and (ii) the payment of part of these unsecured claims into

    Eneva's capital, through the capitalization of the claims procedure,

    and/or the granting of a waiver as foreseen in clause 5a. 

    2.1.72.  “Underwriting with the Assets”: procedure by which some of the

    new shares to be issued will be paid for through underwriting with

    assets, in accordance with the provisions of this plan and in

    conformity with article 171, § 2º, of the business corporation act and

    the other applicable legal provisions.

    2.2.  Clauses and Annexes. Except where stated otherwise, all the clauses and

    annexes mentioned in this plan refer to the clauses and annexes of this plan, just as

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    23/253

    FINAL VERSION

    23

    the references to the clauses or items of this plan also refer to the respective sub-

    clauses and sub-items. 

    2.3.  Titles. The titles of the chapters and clauses of this plan were included

    solely for reference and should not influence its interpretation or the content of itsprovisions. 

    2.4.  Terms. The terms “include”, “including” and similar terms should be

    interpreted as if accompanied by the expression, "but not limited to". 

    2.5.  References. References to any documents or instruments include all the

    respective amendments, consolidations and additions, except if expressly stated

    otherwise.

    2.6.  Legal Provisions. References to legal provisions and laws shall be

    interpreted as references to such provisions as valid on that date or on a date

    which is specifically determined by the context.

    2.7.  Terms. All the terms foreseen in this plan will be counted in accordance

    with the form determined in article 132 of the Civil Code, ignoring the start date

    but including the maturity date. Any terms in this plan (whether counted in

    working days or not) whose final term falls on a day which is not a working daywill automatically be extended to the first subsequent working day.

    3.  GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE REORGANIZATION MEASURES

    3.1.  Objective of the Plan. The plan seeks to allow Eneva and Eneva

    Participações  to overcome their economic-financial crises, adopt the additional

    measures necessary for their operational reorganization, and preserve the direct

    and indirect jobs and the rights of their creditors and shareholders.

    3.2.  Restructuring of the Claims. In order that the companies under

    reorganization may achieve their desired financial and operational recovery, it is

    essential to restructure the claims, which process will basically occur through (i)

    the capitalization of the claims held by the unsecured creditors who select this

    option, (ii) a waiver in relation to some of the unsecured creditors, and (iii) re-

    profiling of the debt for payment of the remaining balance of the unsecured claims,

    among other measures foreseen in this plan.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    24/253

    FINAL VERSION

    24

    3.2.1.  Minimum Reduction of the Unsecured Claims. The economic

    projections on which the payment proposals in this plan were based

    took as a premise the fact that a minimum of 40% (forty percent) of the

    total value of the unsecured claims would be reduced through a

    combination of the results obtained through the capitalization of theclaims and the granting of the waiver foreseen in clause 5a ("Minimum

    Reduction of the Unsecured Claims").  In the event that, during the

    verification of the percentage reduction of the unsecured claims, it was

    determined that the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims was

    not achieved, based on the proposed percentage reductions in the

    unsecured claims advised, the unsecured creditors who find themselves

    below the weighted average obtained will have the respective proposed

    percentage reduction of the unsecured claim increased, by the

    companies under reorganization, at their sole discretion, in order to

    allow the attainment of the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims,

    in accordance with the terms of clause 5.4.3.2.4.

    3.3.  Re-profiling of the liability of the operational companies of the Eneva

    Group. In parallel to this plan, the companies under reorganization will make

    every effort to renegotiate new conditions and terms with the creditors of the

    operational companies of the Eneva Group which are not undergoing court-

    supervised reorganization, in such a manner as to adapt the payment of theliability of each company to the generation of cash obtained through the operation

    of the respective venture.

    3.4.  Strengthening of Eneva S.A.'s capital and balance sheet structure

    through a Capital Increase. In order to strengthen its capital and balance sheet

    structure, reduce its borrowing and receive assets capable of contributing to its

    cash generation and/or its strategic positioning, Eneva will arrange a capital

    increase, through the issuance of new shares at the unit cost of R$0.15 (fifteen

    cents) for each new share, to be subscribed by the shareholders, unsecured

    creditors, investors and the owners of other property and rights which may be

    accepted by the companies under reorganization for the purposes of

    underwriting/subscription (in accordance with their exclusive criteria of

    convenience and opportuneness), and paid for through (i) investment in specie, (ii)

    capitalization of the claims and (iii) underwriting with the assets, in accordance

    with the terms foreseen in this plan.

    3.5. 

    Strengthening of Eneva S.A.'s capital and balance sheet structurethrough the attainment of New Funds. To reestablish the working capital

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    25/253

    FINAL VERSION

    25

    necessary for the continuation of its activities, payment of claims and the

    development of its business plan, Eneva will seek to obtain new funding, in

    accordance with the terms of articles 67, 84, II, and 149 of the LRJ, as described in

    more detail in clause 6 of this plan. In this context, Eneva invites the unsecured

    creditors to grant new funding, which will be paid for and guaranteed inaccordance with the terms foreseen in this plan. The creditors who grant new

    funding, thus becoming funding creditors, will receive the unconverted balance of

    the unsecured claims in more favorable conditions than those creditors which

    opted not to grant new funding, as detailed in clause 6ª. 

    3.6.  Corporate Restructuring. The companies under reorganization may also

    arrange for the corporate restructuring of the Eneva Group, in order to achieve a

    corporate structure better suited to the development of its activities as rescaled in

    the context of the court-supervised reorganization and the business plan resulting

    from the implementation of this plan. Bearing in mind that the cited corporate

    restructuring will occur in the sphere of the fulfillment of this plan and always in

    the best interests of the companies under reorganization and of the success of the

    court-supervised reorganization, it may be carried out without the need for prior

    authorization by any creditor, provided that all the applicable legal, regulatory and

    contractual provisions are observed.

    3.7. 

     Alienation and/or encumbrance of the permanent asset. The companiesunder reorganization may arrange for the alienation and/or encumbrance of any

    assets which are free and unencumbered (or through the consent of the creditor

    who holds any guarantee on the asset), whether part of the permanent asset or

    not, as expressly authorized by the court of reorganization in accordance with

    article 66 of the LRJ or by this plan, whilst respecting the limits observed in the

    LRJ, in this plan and in the other contracts in force signed by the Eneva Group with

    creditors not subject to court-supervised reorganization. 

    4. 

    CAPITAL INCREASE

    4.1.  Precedent Conditions. The following precedent conditions must be

    cumulatively fulfilled and/or waived by the companies under reorganization (and

    only by them, depending on the case) for the realization of the capital increase and

    the implementation of the other provisions contained in this plan: (i) the judicial

    ratification of the plan; and (ii) a commitment from the controlling shareholders,

    on an irrevocable and irreversible basis, to freely assign their respective

    preemptive rights and/or renounce their priority rights, depending on the case, inwhole or in part, in favor of the unsecured creditors and/or investors who wish to

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    26/253

    FINAL VERSION

    26

    participate in the capital increase through underwriting with the assets, in order

    that the capital increase may occur as provided for in this plan; and (iii) the

    obtention of the pertinent legal, regulatory and contractual approvals. 

    4.2. 

    Commitment to realize the Capital Increase. Eneva undertakes, on anirrevocable and irreversible basis, through this plan, to ensure that a special

    meeting of Eneva’s shareholders  is held, within 30 (thirty) days of the date on

    which the precedent conditions were fulfilled and/or waived, for the purposes of

    voting on the capital increase, through the issuance of new shares, to be paid for by

    investment in specie, through the capitalization of the claims and underwriting

    with the assets, as foreseen in this plan.

    4.3.  Value of the Capital Increase. The total value of the capital increase will be

    equal to the sum (i) of the quantity which may comprise the investment in specie,

    (ii) the totality of the capitalized claims and (iii) the sum corresponding to the

    global value of the assets to be underwritten. The unit cost of each new share

    issued will be R$0.15 (fifteen cents). 

    4.3.1.  Underwriting with Assets. In the event of Eneva's accepting , for the

    purposes of subscribing to the capital increase, in accordance with its

    exclusive criteria of convenience and opportuneness, assets and rights

    which may contribute to its cash generation and/or strategicpositioning, as many new shares as are necessary, in the light of the

    value of the underwritten asset, will be delivered in exchange for the

    underwriting, in observance of the provision of article 8 of the business

    corporation act and provided that the precedent conditions are satisfied

    and/or waived for the realization of the increase of capital.

    4.3.1.1.  Communication by the party interested in underwriting with

    assets. Creditors, shareholders and investors who wish to

    participate in the capital increase by underwriting with assets must

    communicate their intention to Eneva at, the creditors' meeting at

    which the approval of the plan is to be voted on, through the

    completion of the appropriate form, a model of which comprises

     Annex 4.3.1.1 of this plan. This communication must be

    accompanied by evaluation reports drafted by first rate evaluation

    companies, and comply with the provision of article 8 of the business

    corporation act. In the hypothesis of a capital increase by

    underwriting with the assets, Eneva reserves the right, when it

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    27/253

    FINAL VERSION

    27

    considers it opportune, to perform a legal, accounting, commercial,

    financial, environmental and business audit of the respective assets.

    4.4.  Limitation regarding the consolidation of absolute shareholder

    control over Eneva. In order to avoid, as a result of the capital increase, anyunsecured creditor's consolidating absolute shareholder control over Eneva, which

    is to say, of directly or indirectly assuming a shareholding interest in Eneva equal

    to or greater than 50% (fifty percent), the exercise of the options foreseen in this

    plan will be limited in the following manner: the fraction of the definitive

    percentage reduction of the unsecured claim allocated for the purposes of the

    capitalization of the claims which may result in consolidated control, will be

    automatically waived, in accordance with clause 5a of this plan. For the purposes

    of limitation foreseen in this clause, only firm expressions of interest, received

    from the unsecured creditors, in participating in the capital increase through the

    capitalization of credits, investment in specie and/or underwriting with assets will

    be considered up to the creditors’ meeting. Expressions of interest  from any other

    investors, whether firm or otherwise, will not be considered. 

    4.5.  Same rights. The new shares issued by Eneva in the context of the capital

    increase will confer on their holders the same rights assigned to the other shares

    issued up till today by Eneva, including the dividends and interest on theshareholders' equity which may be declared by Eneva after the date of ratification

    of the capital increase, and in observance of the provision of clause 4.11

    4.6.  Bonuses, division and grouping of shares. The number of new shares to

    be delivered in compliance with this plan will be simultaneously and

    proportionally adjusted to the capital increases through the giving of bonuses, and

    the division and grouping of shares which may occur as of this date, without any

    charge to the beneficiary and in the same proportion established for such events.

    Thus, by way of example, (i) in the case of grouping of shares, the number of new

    shares to be delivered shall be divided by the same factor as the grouping of the

    shares; and (ii) in the case of the division of shares or bonuses, the number of new

    shares to be delivered shall be multiplied by the same factor as the division of the

    shares or by the same factor used in the giving of bonuses.

    4.7.   Assignment of the preemptive right and/or waiver of the right of

    priority. If the capital increase is carried out by private subscription, Eneva

    undertakes to make every effort to obtain from the controlling shareholders acommitment, on an irrevocable and irreversible basis, to assign their respective

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    28/253

    FINAL VERSION

    28

    preemptive rights to the investors and/or unsecured creditors, in whole or in part,

    in order that the capital increase may occur as per the terms foreseen in this plan.

    Similarly, if the capital increase is realized through a public offering with restricted

    placement efforts, in accordance with the terms of ICVM 476/09, Eneva

    undertakes to make every effort to obtain a commitment from the controllingshareholders, on an irrevocable and irreversible basis, to assign their respective

    preemptive right and/or waive their respective priority right in favor of the

    investors and/or unsecured creditors, in whole or part, so that the capital increase

    may be implemented as foreseen in this plan. 

    4.8.  New shares deriving from the capitalization of the claims and the

    respective release. The effective delivery of the new shares resulting from the

    capitalization of the claims, represents the payment of the capitalized claims, with

    a full, broad, general and unlimited release being granted, as a matter of law,

    between the companies under reorganization, on one side, and the respective

    unsecured creditor, on the other, regarding this fraction of the claim, for all legal

    effects and purposes. 

    4.9.  Mandate. Enevais hereby mandated and authorized, on an irrevocable and

    irreversible basis, by force of this plan, in accordance with the terms of article 684

    of the Civil Code, to represent, jointly or singly, the beneficiaries of the new shares

    on the signing of all the documents necessary to implement and effect the deliveryof the new shares, including, but not limited to, the subscription form before the

    bookkeeping institution of the shares issued by Eneva.

    4.10.  Other procedures. The other terms and procedures related to the increase

    of capital, in addition to those already foreseen in this plan, will be timely disclosed

    in accordance with the business corporation act and the LRJ, where applicable and

    if necessary.

    4.11. 

    Lock-Up Period. During the Lock-Up Period, the unsecured creditors will

    be prohibited from offering, selling, contracting to sell, promising to sell, loaning,

    granting on a fiduciary basis or, in any other manner, trading or transferring the

    ownership, offering a call option (exercisable during the lock-up period), short-

    selling or disposing in any other way, of the new shares received in the sphere of

    the increase of capital. The cited restriction is expressly agreed to prevent the

    unsecured creditors, during the lock-up period, from participating in any hedge or

    other transaction which may be conceived in order, or which may lead, to or result

    in, the alienation of the new shares held by them during the lock-up period, even ifsuch new shares are alienated by a party other than the unsecured creditor during

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    29/253

    FINAL VERSION

    29

    the lock-up period. The cited prohibition on hedging or transactions includes any

    short-selling or any purchase, sale or granting of any right (including any call or

    sale option, without limitation) regarding, or referred to in, any of the new shares

    owned by the unsecured creditor, or in relation to any other security which

    includes, whether related to, or referred to in, or which derives from anysignificant part of, the value of such shares, including total return swaps or other

    derivative operations involving exclusively financial liquidation.

    5.  REESTRUCTURING AND LIQUIDATION OF THE DEBTS

    5.1.  Payment of the Labor Claims. The claims held by the labor creditors will

    be paid in —  without discount —  in 2 (two) equal and successive installments,

    without adjustment for inflation or interest, to be paid on the 30th (thirtieth) and

    60th (sixtieth) days after the Ratification Date.

    5.2.  Payment of the secured creditors. Companies under reorganization do

    not recognize the existence of secured creditors on the request date and, up to the

    present time, no secured creditor has been included on the list of creditors by the

    bankruptcy trustee. In the event of the secured creditors being included on the list

    of creditors by a judicial or arbitral ruling, or by agreement between the parties,

    the cited secured creditors will receive their secured claims under the same

    conditions as the unsecured claims of over R$250,000.00 (two hundred and fiftythousand reais) held by the unsecured creditors, in accordance with the terms of

    clause 5.3 of this plan.

    5.3.  Payment of unsecured creditors. The payment of unsecured creditors will

    observe the provisions of the clauses below:

    5.3.1.  Linear payment of up to R$250 thousand to all unsecured

    creditors. The sum of up to R$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty

    thousand reais), will be paid in full - without discount - to each of the

    unsecured creditors, limited to the value of the respective unsecured

    claim, in 2 (two) equal and successive installments, without the

    application of inflation adjustment or interest, to be paid on the 30th

    (thirtieth) and 60th (sixtieth) days following the Ratification Date.

    5.3.2.  Obligatory Reduction of the Value of the Unsecured Claims. The

    approval of the plan necessarily implies a reduction, regarding each

    unsecured creditor, of from 30% (thirty percent) to 45% (forty five

    percent) of the value of the unsecured claim, on sums greater thanR$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand reais), which will be

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    30/253

    FINAL VERSION

    30

    paid as per the terms of clause 5.3.1 above, its being the responsibility

    of each unsecured creditor to indicate (i) the respective proposed

    percentage reduction of the unsecured claim and (ii) the preferred form

    for the reduction of its unsecured claim chosen from the following

    options: (a) the capitalization of the total value of the unsecured claimcorresponding to the percentage reduction of the unsecured claim; (b)

    the granting of a full waiver of the unsecured claim corresponding to the

    definitive percentage reduction of the unsecured claim; or (c) a

    combination of alternatives (a) and (b) above, in such case informing the

    exact percentage which its intends to waive and the exact percentage

    which it intends to capitalize in the capital increase..

    5.3.2.1.  Formalization of the Indication.  The proposed percentage

    reduction of the unsecured claim and the chosen form for the

    reduction of the unsecured claim, as provided for in clause 5.3.2

    above must be advised by each of the unsecured creditors during the

    creditors' meeting at which the plan is to be voted on, through the

    completion of the form, the model for which comprises  Annex

    5.3.2.1 of this plan.

    5.3.2.2.  Non-Formalization.  Failure to issue a statement during the

    creditors' meeting at which the plan is to be voted on, will beinterpreted as (i) the unsecured creditor's indicating a preference

    for the minimum of 30% (thirty percent) as the proposed percentage

    reduction of the unsecured claim; and (ii), the unsecured creditor's

    lack of interest in participating in the capital increase, resulting in

    the granting of a full waiver of the value of the unsecured claim

    corresponding to the proposed reduction percentage of the

    unsecured claim, without prejudice to the respective unsecured

    creditor's being subject to the increase procedure foreseen below, in

    the case of non-attainment of the minimum reduction of the

    unsecured claims, which will be subject to the same treatment as

    item (ii) of this clause 5.3.2.2. 

    5.3.2.3.  Verification of the percentage reductions of the unsecured

    claims. After the unsecured creditors have advised their respective

    proposed percentage reductions of the unsecured claim and the

    chosen form of reduction of the unsecured claim, the weighted

    average of these percentages will be calculated, in order to verify if

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    31/253

    FINAL VERSION

    31

    the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims (40%) was or

    wasn't achieved.

    5.3.2.4.  Non-attainment of the Minimum Reduction of the Unsecured

    Claims and the consequent Compulsory Increase of theProposed Percentage Reduction of the Unsecured Claims. As

    explained in this plan, the economic projections which provided the

    basis for the payment proposals took as their premise the fact that a

    minimum of 40% (forty percent) of the total value of the unsecured

    claims would be capitalized and/or waived, depending on the case.

    Thus, in the event that the combination of results verified at the

    creditors' meeting does not achieve the minimum percentage of 40%

    (forty percent) above, the unsecured creditors who potentially

    remain below the weighted average obtained will be informed that

    the respective proposed percentage reduction of the unsecured

    claim will be increased, in accordance with the formula foreseen in

     Annex 2.1.3, until the minimum reduction of the unsecured claims is

    achieved. The increase in each proposed percentage reduction will

    be communicated to all those present at the creditors' meeting, and

    this will become the definitive reduction percentage for the

    unsecured claims, for all legal purposes and effects, and subject to

    the provision of clause 5.3.5 of this plan.

    5.3.2.4.1 As a means of encouraging the granting of a larger

    proposed percentage reduction of the unsecured claim,

    independently of the form of reduction of the unsecured credit

    chosen by each unsecured creditor, in accordance with clause 5.3.2 

    above, the additional percentage reduction alone, corresponding to

    the difference verified between the definitive percentage reduction

    of the unsecured claim (obtained through the increase procedure

    described in clause 5.3.2.4) and the proposed percentage reduction

    of the unsecured claim, will be compulsorily waived by the

    respective unsecured creditor.

    5.3.3.  Payment of the Remaining Balance of the Unsecured Claims in

    accordance with the terms of instruments A and B. The remaining

    balance of the unsecured claims will be paid, without any discount,

    through instruments A and B, in accordance with the following terms:

    5.3.3.1.  Instrument A. Instrument A will have the following characteristics: 

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    32/253

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    33/253

    FINAL VERSION

    33

    higher percentage reduction of the unsecured claim, the plan provides, in relation

    to each unsecured creditor, for the allocation to instrument A of 1% (one percent)

    of the value of the unsecured claim(following the discount of the R$250,000.00

    paid in accordance with clause 5.3.1) for each 1% (one percent) of the definitive

    percentage reduction of the unsecured claim fixed above the minimum reductionpercentage of the unsecured claim of 30% (thirty percent). The remaining balance

    of the unsecured claims not allocated to instrument A above will automatically be

    allocated for payment in accordance with instrument B.

    5.3.4.4 Global limitation of the value designated to instrument A. Companies

    under reorganization will designate the maximum and unalterable sum of up to

    R$460,000,000.00 (four hundred and sixty million reais) for the purposes of

    allocation under the terms of instrument A. Only the following parties will qualify

    for the terms foreseen in instrument A: (i) unsecured creditors whose definitive

    percentage reduction of the unsecured claims is set above the minimum of 30%

    (thirty percent), in accordance with the terms of clause 5.3.4.3; and (ii) Funding

    Creditors, as provided for in clause 6a of the plan.

    5.3.5. Optional Increase in the Definitive Percentage Reduction of the

    Unsecured Claim and allocation of the Remaining Balance of the Unsecured

    Claims to Instrument C. Furthermore, as a means of encouraging a greater

    reduction in the unsecured claims, the unsecured creditors who granted adefinitive percentage reduction equal to or greater than 40% (forty percent), will

    be granted the exclusive option of increasing by a further 20% (twenty percent)

    the respective definitive percentage reductions of their unsecured claims,

    exclusively by waiver of debt, in order that they may be entitled to the full

    allocation of the remaining balances of their unsecured claims to Instrument C. In

    other words, in this case, the remaining balance of the unsecured claims of the

    respective unsecured creditor will not be allocated to instruments A or B, but

    exclusively to instrument C, independently of whether the respective unsecured

    creditor granted new funding or not.

    5.3.5.1. Instrument C: Instrument C will have the following

    characteristics:

    Interest : 100% (one hundred percent) of the IDC plus interest of

    2.5% (two point five percent) per year, payable from the date of

    ratification.

    Grace Period: Grace period for the amortization of the principal of

    8 (eight) years and for the payment of interest of 6 (six) years,counted from the date of ratification.

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    34/253

    FINAL VERSION

    34

    Payment of interest: The interest foreseen in the plan will be paid

    every month between the 7th

      (seventh) and 8th

      (eighth) year

    following the date of ratification.

    Amortization of the principal and payment of interest :

    Amortization of the principal and interest payments will be madeevery month in the period between the 9 th  (ninth) and 14th 

    (fourteenth) years following the date of ratification, in accordance

    with the following timetable of payment:

    9th Year 10th Year 11th Year 12th Year 13th Year 14th Year

    10% 15% 15% 15% 20% 25%

    5.3.5.2. Formalization of the option regarding the optional

    increase. The decision, by each unsecured creditor, to exercise the

    option to increase their respective definitive percentage reduction of

    the unsecured claim by an additional 20% (twenty percent), in

    accordance with the terms foreseen in clause 5.3.5 above, must be

    communicated during the creditors' meeting at which the plan is

    voted on, on the conclusion of the procedure for verifying the

    percentage reductions of the unsecured claims, through the

    completion of the appropriate form, a model of which comprises Annex 5.3.5.2 of this plan.

    5.4.  Payment of Micro-Business and Small Business Creditors. The claims

    held by the micro-business and small business creditors will be paid in full -

    without discount - in 2 (two) equal and successive installments, without

    adjustment for inflation or interest, to be paid on the 30th (thirtieth) and 60th

    (sixtieth) days after the Ratification Date.

    5.5. 

    Payment of Late Creditors. The claims held by late creditors will be paid in

    10 (ten) monthly installments, without the application or capitalization of interest,

    with the first payment becoming due after the first month subsequent to the

    settlement of all the other pre-bankruptcy claims and first priority claims.

    5.6.  Form of Payment . The claims will be paid to the creditors through the

    direct transference of funds to the bank account of the respective creditor, through

    a wire transfer (DOC) or an Electronic Funds Transfer (TED). Eneva may contract a

    payment agent to effect such payments to the creditors. The deposit slip of the sum

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    35/253

    FINAL VERSION

    35

    paid to each creditor will serve as proof of the settlement of the respective

    payment. 

    5.7.  Creditors’ Bank Accounts. Creditors must inform their respective bank

    account details for this purpose, through written communication addressed toEneva, in accordance with the terms of clause 9.4. Payments which are not made

    due to the creditors' not having informed their bank details within a minimum of

    30 (thirty) days of the projected date of payment will not be considered as non-

    compliance events in relation to the plan. In this case, and at the discretion of the

    companies under reorganization, the payments due to the creditors who did not

    inform their bank details may be made in court, at the expense of the creditor, who

    will be answerable for any added costs arising from the use of the judicial channel

    to make the deposit. There will be no application of interest, fines, late payment

    charges or breach of this plan if the payments were not made as a result of the

    creditors not having timely informed their bank account details. 

    5.8.  Increases in the Values of the Claims. In the hypothesis that there is any

    increase in the value of any claim deriving from a res judicata court judgment or

    agreement between the parties, the increased value of the claim will be paid in the

    form foreseen in this plan, based on the res judicata court judgment or signing of

    the agreement between the parties. In this case, the rules of payment of the

    increased value of such claims, particularly regarding the application of interest,will be applicable only as of the cited res judicata court judgment or the date of the

    signing of the agreement between the parties.

    6.  GRANTING OF NEW FUNDING

    6.1.  Granting of new funding. As indicated by the companies under

    reorganization in their invitation-petition submitted to the records of the court-

    supervised reorganization together with this plan, the companies under

    reorganization ratify the invitation presented to the unsecured creditors to grant

    new funding to Eneva, with a view to strengthening the capital structure of the

    company, in the minimum sum of R$10,000,000.00 (ten million reais) per

    unsecured creditor, and respecting the global limit of R$100,000,000.00 (one

    hundred million reais). The granting of new funding must reflect the proportion of

    the respective unsecured creditor's interest in the total sum of the unsecured

    claims. If any unsecured creditor does not participate in the provision of new

    funding, the granting unsecured creditors may proportionately increase their

    interest in the new funding to be granted whilst observing, in any scenario, theglobal limit of R$100,000,000.00 (one hundred million reais). The granting

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    36/253

    FINAL VERSION

    36

    unsecured creditors must communicate their firm proposal to grant new funding

    within a term of 30 (thirty) consecutive days counted from the date of submission

    of this plan in court, in accordance with the terms of clause 9.4, with express

    stipulation of the value to be granted. After the 30th (thirtieth) day counted from

    the date of submission of this plan in court, a term of fifteen consecutive days willbegin to run for the unsecured creditor to effectively grant the new funding, within

    the limits already indicated, through a deposit in a bank account owned by Eneva

    S.A., under court-supervised reorganization, held with Banco Itaú Unibanco S.A.

    (341), Agency 0911, Account Number 07727-9.

    6.2.  Conditions of payment of the New Funding.  The new funding will be

    repaid to the Funding Creditors on the following conditions: 

    Interest : 100% (one hundred percent) of the IDC plus interest of 3%

    (three percent) per year, applicable as of the date of the respective

    disbursement.

    Payment Term: 360 (three hundred and sixty) days counted from

    the disbursement of the new funding or on the date when the price

    of the alienation of Eneva's interest in Pecém I is deposited in favor

    of Eneva, whichever of the two occurs first.

     Amortization of the principal and payment of interest: in a single

    installment, up front, to be made within the payment term above.

    6.3.  Guarantees. The new funding will be guaranteed by the shared guarantees,

    through the signing of a contractual instrument, specific for this purpose, between

    the funding creditors and Eneva. 

    6.4.  Priority in the allocation of the sum designated to instrument A.

    Following the effective release of the new funding in favor of Eneva, the funding

    creditors will have proportionally reserved for themselves the sum of up to

    R$100,000,000.00 (one hundred million reais) of the maximum sum of

    R$460,000,000.00 (four hundred and sixty million reais) designated for the

    payment of the unsecured creditors in accordance with instrument A. For this

    purpose, each R$1.00 (one real) of new money granted will confer on the funding

    creditor the right to reserve R$1.00 (one real) proportionately for itself.

    Not withstanding the provisions of the sub-clauses of this chapter 6, if the funding

    creditor exercises the option foreseen in clause 5.3.5 of this plan, the totality of

    the respective remaining balance of its unsecured claims will be exclusively

    allocated to Instrument C and no longer to Instruments A and B, independently ofthe limit foreseen in clause 6.4. 

  • 8/9/2019 Judicial Recovery Plan

    37/253

    FINAL VERSION

    37

    7.   ALIENATION OF ENEVA'S INTEREST IN PECÉM I

    7.1.   Alienation of Pecém I to EDP. As disclosed to the market through a

    relevant fact dated 09/12/2014, in order to resolve its immediate need for cash,Eneva signed a contract for the purchase and sale of the totality of its interest in its

    subsidiary company Pecém I with EDP – Energias do Brasil S.A.,