A Summary of the MainArguments in Judy

Wilyman's PhD Thesisthat investigated

the Control of InfectiousDiseases in Australia

Dr Judy Wilyman PhD

Vaccination Decisions

www.vaccinationdecisions.net

Involuntary Medications ObjectorsParty (IMOP)

WA Senate Candidate

References

1.      Wilyman J. 2015, A Critical Analysis of the

Australian Government’s Rational for its

Vaccination Policies, University of Wollongong.

[Available from

https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4541/]

 

2.      Comments by the Prominent Public Health

Officials of the Twentieth Century 

https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/wp-

content/uploads/2014/02/Comments-by-Public-

Health-Officials-1900-2000-1409061.pdf

 

3.      Stamatikis E. Weiler R, Ioannidis J. 2013.

Undue industry influences that distort healthcare

research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a

review. European Journal of Clinical

Investigation. 43: 5(May): pp469-475.

https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/wp-

content/uploads/2014/02/Stamatakis-13-1-

industry-influence.pdf

 

4.      Engdahl FW. 2015. Shocking Report from

Medical Insiders. NSNBC International On-line.

June 19

http://nsnbc.me/2015/06/19/shocking-report-

from-medical-insiders/ (accessed 17 April 2019)

Dr. Judy Wilyman’sPhD ThesisSummary

Authorised by Michael O'Neill, Involuntary Medication

Objectors (Vaccination/Fluoride) Party,

1800 Nulla Nulla Creek Rd, Bellbrook NSW 2440 Australia

Printed by imoparty.com

Australia’s vaccination policies have been

designed from the recommendations provided by

the World Health Organisation (WHO) under

Global Health Policies. The WHO receives these

recommendations from an advisory group called

the Global Alliance for Vaccines and

Immunisation (GAVI). This alliance includes the

Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies, the

International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the

Rockefeller Foundation and many more private

and public organisations, all with equal input into

global health policies.

 

The GAVI alliance cannot provide objective

advice about disease control because many

of these private organisations profit from the

vaccines they recommend to the WHO.

Specifically, the GAVI alliance’s

recommendations to the WHO do not consider the

diversity of genetics in the population or the

special ecological conditions that vary between

all the WHO member countries – two important

factors in the causality of disease.

 

The WHO recommendations for vaccines are a

one-size fits all and this fact means that these

policies will increase diseases in all populations.

They cannot be described as ‘protective health

policies’ because they contradict the science of

epigenetics; the science showing that individuals

are pre-disposed to diseases due to their genetic

make-up and the interaction with chemicals in

the vaccines.

0 2

The significant decline in deaths and illnesses

from infectious diseases in Australia occurred

before the introduction of vaccines in mass

vaccination programs. It is recognised by all the

prominent public health officials of the twentieth

century that the risk from infectious diseases was

reduced significantly before the majority of

vaccines were developed [2]. This indicates

that mass vaccination was not the main factor

in controlling infectious diseases.

0 1

The majority of the research on vaccine safety

and efficacy that is used by government

regulators and advisory boards is carried out or

sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. These

are the companies that profit from selling

vaccines. In addition most representatives on

vaccine advisory boards have financial conflicts

of interests with pharmaceutical companies.

Research has shown that conflicts of interest in

vaccine research and on vaccine advisory boards

can lead to bias in the design of clinical trials

and the conclusions drawn from these studies [3].

It has also been proven that much of the industry-

funded science is fraudulent [4].

There are important areas of research relevant to

vaccination policy that have not been performed

but are necessary to make claims of safety and

efficacy about vaccines.

The undone science includes safety studies using

a true inert placebo in the unvaccinated group

for an appropriate time-period – either for single

vaccines or for the combined vaccination

schedule.

The safety of vaccines cannot be verified without

this study and yet this study has never been done.

There is no justification for mandating any

vaccine in government policies without this

scientific evidence. Australians need to demand

a truly independent government vaccine advisory

board (free of COI) to assess the vaccine-

industry funded research before vaccines are

recommended to the community in government

policies.

0 3

0 4

Contrary to the Australian government

and media’s assertions, my PhD thesis

does not ‘oppose immunisation’.

My PhD thesis provides the evidence that

opposes mandatory vaccination for any

infectious disease.

Here is a summary of the four main

critical points regarding the Australian

government’s vaccination policies that I

presented in my PhD thesis [1]:

A SUMMARY OF THE MAINARGUMENTS IN MY PHDTHESIS THATINVESTIGATEDTHE CONTROL OFINFECTIOUS DISEASES INAUSTRALIA