june 13, 1995 board of directors metropolitan...

June 13, 1995

Los Angeles County

Metropolitan

Transportation

Authority

425 South Main Street

Los Angeles, CA

9oo~3q393

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

UPDATE ON ACQUISITION OF PERMANENTSUBSURFACE EASEMENTS THROUGH THEHOLLYWOOD HILLS

213.972.6ooo

BACKGROUND

At its May 24, 1995 meeting, the MTA Board of Directors was requested to hold apublic hearing and adopt a Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commencement ofeminent domain proceedings to acquire permanent subsurface easements (PSE) fromapproximately 84 properties. The properties are located in the Hollywood Hills alongthe alignment of the Metro Rail Segment 3 tunnel alignment between theHollywood/Highland and Universal City stations.

Approximately 30 property owners were present at the meeting and addressed theBoard concerning the staffs request to initiate condemnation action. The Boarddeferred any action on the adoption of the resolution for 30 days and requested staff towork with the property owners during the 30 days and report back to the Board on allactions taken.

ACTIONS TAKEN SUBSEQUENT TO BOARD MEETING

The Real Estate, Construction and Public Affairs staffs immediately made plans tohold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the project and torespond to all questions raised by the property owners. A meeting was held onWednesday, May 31, at the Campo De Cahuenga in Studio City. A meeting noticewas sent to all property owner notifying them of the meeting. Approximately 35property owners attended the meeting.

Staff members from Real Estate, Construction and County Counsel madepresentations and answered questions raised by the property owners. A writtenresponse to frequently asked Real Estate questions was prepared as a hand-out andwas distributed at the meeting (Attachment 1). The issues raised at the meeting the property owners were primarily in the following areas:

¯ The selection of the alignment through the Hollywood Hills.

¯ The involvement of property owners during the selection process.

MTA Board of DirectorsJune 13, 1995

¯ The effect of the tunnel on the future value of their properly.

¯ The possible effect of noise and vibration from the train operations and MTA’s responsibilityto mitigate damages.

¯ The possible effect of the tunnel construction and operations on the seismic activity in thearea.

Responses were given at the meeting and staff is following up with the following actions:

¯ Mailed follow-up package of information to each property owner on June 8 which includedmaterials requested at the meeting related to public participation in the Metro Red LineProject environmental process (Attachment 2).

¯ Agreed to prepare deed reservation language which would reserve to owners and to theirsuccessors specified rights with respect to the project, particularly with regard to noise andvibration and perhaps other future damage issues. Agreement is being prepared by CountyCounsel.

¯ Arrange to have a seismic expert from the California Institute of Technology address the nextmeeting of the Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension Citizen’s Committee and inviteproperty owners to attend.

¯ Assign MTA Real Estate Staff to complete the acquisition process.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Staff has reviewed the construction schedule and determined that the construction need date canbe divided into two groups.

Starter Tunnel Easements

Running Tunnel Easements

July 26, 1995

October 1, 1995

Based on the revised schedule, staff will recommend that the request to adopt the Resolution ofNecessity presented at the May 24th meeting be withdrawn. A new public hearing will bescheduled for the July 26 Board Meeting to adopt a resolution for the two parcels that are neededfor the starter tunnel. MTA Real Estate staff will continue negotiations with those propertyownerS~n an effort to complete the acquisition through negotiations.

The Real Estate staff will continue to communicate with the remaining property owners toaddress their concerns and to complete the acquisitions through negotiations. Those parcels notacquired to meet the October 1, 1995 construction need date will be brought back to the Board atits September meeting.

The Real Estate, Construction, Public Affairs and County Counsel staff are committed tocontinue working with the community to address their issues.

Prepared by Velma C. Marshall

Attachment "i"

RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED REAL ESTATE QUESTIONS

APPRAISAL QUESTIONS

Q1. Will the MTA send an owner a copy of the appraisal of his property?

Upon request, owners of one to three dwelling unit properties are entitled to review MTAappraisals of their property. Please note that in this instance, the appraisal is of asubsurface easement found to have a nominal value and is not an appraisal of the full valueof the property.

Q2. Is Just Compensation based on nominal value or market value?

Just Compensation is the fair market value of any taking by the MTA as determined by anappraisal. The offered amount presented to the property owner will be this amount orhigher, but never less. Nominal value is presumed to exist where there is no perceptibledift~rence in the market value of the entire property, before and after the taking. Inessence, the taking has little or no market value. Since under most circumstances, aproperty owner cannot be expected to convey an interest in property without receivingsome compensation, the appraiser determines a nominal value for the taking that is basedupon his research, analysis and experience. Based on the appraisal, the MTA hasdetermined that this nominal value is considered to be the fair market value of the taking.

Q3. What market information do you have that shows that a permanent subsurfaceeasement for a subway makes no perceptible difference on the market value of theentire residential property?

There is no market information that exist for a situation comparable to the type ofacquisitions involved here; i.e. the acquisition of extremely deep subsurface easements thatrun through rock formation. In this case the appraiser had to reach his opinion of valuebased on conclusions drawn from engineering and environmental studies that (1) thetransit construction and operation will not result in any significant adverse impacts fromnoise or vibration; (2) the tunnel construction and operations will not result in damage existing improvements nor interfere with the current or future highest and best use of theland; (3) ttiere is no difference in the highest and best use before and after the acquisitionand (4) there is no damage to the remainder as a result of the subsurface easement. Theappraiser concluded that the presence of a permanent subsurface easement will not affectthe value of the surface improvements. Market studies that have been performed on landvalues near or adjacent to rail stations have shown that properties that are near railstations have experienced an increase in value.

Q4. Is the nominal value the same for all residential property easements?

The nominal valuation for all "Like" properties is the same. The types of propertyincluded single family residences, multifamily residences, and commercial developments.

Real Estate ResponsesPage 2

QS.

A.

Q6.

Q7.

A.

QS.

Are your appraisals done in-house or by independent appraisers?

The appraisal of the subsurface easements were performed by independent appraisers.

Please identify the company or individuals who performed the appraisals of ourproperties?

All of the subsurface easement appraisals were prepared by Michael Popwell, CGREA, ofMeza and Madrid Development, Inc., and reviewed by independent, fee appraiser, TaylorDark, MAI.

Will granting the easement affect, in any way, the development of my property?

No, the tunnels are so deep, ranging from 150 to 900 feet below grade, that futuredevelopment will not be affected.

In arriving at a nominal value for the easement, were severance damages and/orfuture damages considered?

Yes, the primary function of the appraisal was to determine the fair market value of thesubsurface easements and to estimate the severance damage, if any, to the parentproperties. A remainder property results when subtracting the permanent subsurfaceeasement from the parent property. The appraiser concluded that there was nodifferentiation between the remainder properties’ existing utility or use and that of theparent properties before the taking. The only difference found would be the existence ofthe permanent subsurface easement itself. Consequently, since there would be no damagesto the parent properties, severance and/or future damages were not warranted.

NEGOTIATIONS/ACQUISITION QUESTIONS

Q9.

A.

Will the MTA accept counteroffers? How can counter offers be made?

Th~ MTA will consider counteroffers, particularly if they are accompanied withinformation that would support the amount of the counteroffer. /vlTA will review theinformation submitted and determine whether there is a basis to accept the counteroffer.Any counteroffer should be made in writing to the MTA Director of Real Estate, Velma

C. Marshall.

Q10. What happens if an MTA offer is rejected?

If the MTA offer is rejected and it appears that a settlement cannot be reached, the MTAReal Estate staff will notify the property owner that a public hearing is being scheduledbefore the MTA Board of Directors to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessityto acquire the property through the eminent domain process. If the Board adopts theresolution, a condemnation action will be filed with the Superior Court of the County of


Los Angeles. However, the MTA staff will continue to work with property owners toreach a settlement prior to trial.

Qll.

A.

Q12.

What effect, if any, will granting of the easement have upon my mortgage?

This depends upon the language in your mortgage contract. You should review your loandocuments to determine what your lender requires, if any interest in the property isconveyed to a third party. If you have some doubts about this issue, you may wait untilthe MTA has filed a condemnation suit. At your request, the MTA will name themortgagor in the suit and this will protect you from any action by the mortgagor.

In recording the easement deeds at the County Recorder’s Office, does MTA pay forall fees connected with the recording?

A. Yes.

CONSTRUCTION/OPERATIONS RELATED QUESTIONS

QI3. Does granting the easement release the MTA from any responsibility or liabilityfrom damage created, caused or resulting from construction work?

No. If there is any damage to your property as a result of MTA construction, a claimmay be made to the MTA Risk Management Construction Claim Department.

Q14. Will the MTA compensate property owners for all damages to properties and allcosts incurred in seeking recovery?

Any physical damage to your property caused by the construction or operation of theproject should be processed as an insurance claim. If noise or vibration occurs whichunreasonably interferes with the beneficial use of the property, a claim should be made tothe MTA. "If the insurance carrier in the former instance, or the MTA in the latterinstance, concurs in the damage, there will be no cost to you in seeking recovery. If theclaim is disputed, the property owner may bring an action against the MTA. Successfulplaintiffs in such cases usually recover damages and costs.

Q15. Does MTA have an indemnification agreement in place to protect property ownersfrom losses or damages to their property?

A. No. (See responses to Questions 13 and 14 above.


QI6.

A.

Q17.

Q18.

Q19.

Q20.

Can you assure me that a vent shaft will not be located on my property?

No, not at this time. The construction of the twin tunnels will require the construction ofa mid-line vent shaft and several alternative locations will be studied. Potentially affectedproperty, owners will be notified prior to a decision by the MTA Board on the selected

site.

Are maps available showing the subsurface easement boundaries and maps showingvertical cross sections of the project as it affects individual properties?

A parcel plat map is customarily included with every Offer Letter submitted to a propertyowner. This map shows the boundaries of the easement take area in relationship to theparent property. A Property Identification drawing is available which shows the alignmentof the tunnel through the mountains and a copy is available at this meeting for yourreview. Bulky documents and publications, such as parcel cross-sectional views and theEnvironmental Impact Reports, are available for viewing at the MTA offices located at

818 West 7th Street, Los Angeles.

Will you send out proposed plans for the construction and operation of the Projectwithin the targeted easement areas?

No. Copies of construction plans are available for a fee and may be obtained bycontacting the Records Management Center, ATTN: Judith Butler, 818 West 7th Street,Los Angeles, 90017 (213) 244-7074.

How soon after signing the agreement or easement deed can I expect to receivepayment?

Once the agreement and/or easement deed and related documents has been signed,notarized, and submitted to MTA, a check will be processed and mailed to you in two to

four weeks.

After granting the easement, will MTA’s approval be required for futuredevelopment of the property?

The MTA has the fight to review all building plans that may affect the tunnels. However,with the tunnels at 150 feet to 900 feet below residentially zoned properties, there is anextremely low likelihood that any proposed construction would pose a threat to the safetyof the tunnels.

I

Attachment "2"

MLos Angeles CounD’

MetropolitanTransportation

Authority

West Seventh Street

Suite 300os Angeles, CA 9oo~7

z~3.97z.6ooo

Mallim3 Address:

P.O. Box 194Angeles, CA 90o53

June 8, 1995

Bassan & Maryann Mechammil3797 Cahuenga BoulevardNorth Hollywood, CA 91604

Dear Bassan & Maryann Mechammil

A meeting was held on Wednesday, May 31, 1995 at theCampo de Cahuenga with property owners affected by thefuture construction of the MTA Metro Red Line tunnel. Wewould like to express our appreciation to the thirty ormore of you who were able to attend.

The MTA cou~L~itted to provide copies of the informationthat was distributed at the meeting to all of theproperty owners. Enclosed is a composite list of thequestions that have been asked regarding the MTAappraisal and acquisition process for the subsurfaceeasements and questions regarding construction andoperation issues. This document was handed out at themeeting.

As you know, the Public Hearing held by the MTA Board onMay 28th was continued for 30 days in order to permit thestaff to meet with property owners regarding the manyissues raised at the meeting. Staff will recommend thatthe Public Hearing be canceled for the June 28thmeetingin order to permit more time to resolve many of the openissues with you.

Responding to the requests made by many of you the MTAproposes to take the following actions:

MTA will proceed to acquire the two most northerlyof the parcels required for the tunnelconstruction. Follow-up will be made to theproperty owners and a public hearing will berescheduled for July 26 for parcels C3-402 and C3-406. These two parcels are needed earlier than theremaining parcels.

The real estate staff will continue to work withthe remaining property owners over the next twomonths to remove as many of their objections toaccepting the MTA offer as possible. Ifnegotiations are unsuccessful, it would then be theintent of staff to again schedule the publichearing.

June 8, 1995page 2

It was announced at the May 31st meeting that the MTA hasagreed to double its initial offer to property owners asan administrative settlement for the acquisition of thesubsurface easements. We were asked to put this inwriting and this letter is our confirmation of thatoffer.

Also, at the Wednesday night meeting, MTA counsel agreedto prepare a purchase agreement with language which wouldreserve to owners and to their successors specifiedrights with respect to the project, particularly withregard to noise and vibration and other future damageissues. This document along with the MTA SubsurfaceEasement Deed will be sent to property owners as soon asitis available.

A number of questions were asked at the meeting regardingpublic notification and involvement in the planningprocess. In response we are enclosing the "SummaryReport for Reconstruction of Public Participation for theMetro Red Line Project" This report describes thepublic involvement process for the Metro Red LineProject. .

There were also a number of questions about the tunnelsand earthquakes. We are arranging to have a seismicexpert from the California Institute of Technologyaddress the next meeting of the Metro Red Line NorthHollywood Extension Citizen’s Committee. When thearrangements have been completed we will send you aninvitation to attend.

If you have additional requests, or would like toschedule a meeting to discuss MTA’s offer to purchase asubsurface easement, please feel free to contact Mr. JohnFurby, Senior Real Estate Officer at (213) 244-6722 Mr. James Wiley, Manager of Acquisition Services at (213)244-6404.

Sincerely,

VELMA C. MARSHALLDirector of Real Estate

Enclosurescc: MTA Board Members

SUMMARY REPORTFOR

RECONSTRUCTIONOF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

FORTHE METRO RED LINE PROJECT

Prepared forRail Construction Corporation

818 W. 7th StreetLos Angeles, CA 90017

Prepared byEngineering-Science, Inc.

199 South Los Robles AvenuePasadena, CA 91101

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This summary report was prepared for the Los Angeles County MetropolitanTransportation Authority/Rail Construction Corporation (MTA/RCC) underContract Number EN025, Contract Work Order 005. The purpose of this reportwas to develop a record of the public involvement process for the entire Metro RedLine Project from 1986 to 1989.

The public awareness and involvement process for the Metro Red Line Project wasdocumented and included the following activities:

¯ Special meetings held at various locations;

Newspapers publications, Metro News Bulletin and RTD Transit Reader forall the public hearings held and minutes taken, including testimonies ofspeakers and attendants from those meetings;

¯ Letters and comments from private individuals and organizations;

¯ Signed petitions from the public in favor of a subway route throughHollywood Boulevard; ......

¯ Certificates of transmission and delivery for the project documents to privatecitizens and Federal and Local Agencies; and

¯ Distribution lists for the project documents to Federal, State, and Local

Agencies.

The reviewed documents are summarized in the attached spreadsheet (seeAttachment 1). These documents are available at RCC Environmental Compliance.Additional information regarding this report can be obtained from Mr. Jim Sowell,Mana~;er of Environmental Compliance, at (213) 244-6730.

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 1 - MODIFIED)

The MTA/RCC is constructing a 17.3 mile Metro Red Line subway system. TheRed Line consists of 3 segments. Segment 1, which extends from Union Station toWestlake/MacArthur Park, has been constructed and is currently in operation.Segment 2 is divided into two alignments: the Wilshire Corridor alignment and theVermont/Hollywood alignment. The Wilshire Corridor alignment begins on

e:\pat\recon sk. doc 1 01/20/94

Wilshire Boulevard, between Alvarado Street and Parkview Street and extendswestward to the intersection of Western Avenue and Wilshire Boulevard. TheVermont/Hollywood alignment begins at the intersection of Wilshire Boulevardand Vermont Avenue and extends northward to the intersection of HollywoodBoulevard and Vine Street. Segment 3 will stretch from the intersection ofHollywood Boulevard and Vine Street through Universal City to LankershimBoulevard in North Hollywood.

A layout of the three segments, a detailed map of Segment 2, and the LocallyPreferred Alternative are shown as Figures 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3.

3.0 RESEARCHED DOCUMENTS

To reconstruct the public involvement process, MTA/RCC (formerly RTD) andother Agency’s files on the Metro Red Line Project were thoroughly searched andevaluated. During this search, the following individuals were contacted to provideinformation regarding the Metro Red Line Project:

Name

Gabriele Maul-Crumby

Judith A. Butler

Dorothy Peyton Gray

Glen Aguora

Bob Waters

Agency

Transit SystemsDevelopment Division

(TSD) of RTDRTD RecordsManagement Supervisor

MTA Librarian

Los Angeles CityDepartment ofTransportation

RTD Board Secretary’sOffice

Document

Stored files index list.

Files at Alameda Storagefacility (operated by FirstAmerica RecordsManagement.)

Public Consultation PlanMilestone Reports, DraftSEIS/SEIR November1987,Final SEIS/SEIR July1989.Mobility ActionCommittee HollywoodGroup meeting files andLaurel Canyon Groupmeeting files.Information from themicrofilm retrieved.

e:\pat\reconsk.doc 2 01 t20/94

I-IGURE 2-1

0

SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 2

ISEGMENT 1

FIGURE 2-2

Wl. SlUR E BLMO

WILSHIRE/WESTERN

WILSHIRE/

WILSHIRE/NORMANDIE

FIGURE 2-3

SCRTD MI-IRO RAIL

LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVEWILSHIRE,/VERMONT/HOLLYWOOD BLVD. SUBWAY

LPA ADOPTED BY SCR’I’D BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 14, 1988

OLYMPIC BLVD

18

SUBWAY

STATION

POTENTIAL RISK

OPERABLE SEGMENTTERMINUS STATIONS

STATION IND.(MO$- t

l UNION ~TATiON2 CIVIC CENTER3 RFTH/I-IlU_4 SEVENTH/F1.0WER5 WILSHIRF_,/ALVARAD 0

6. WILSHIRE,/VI~9~ONT1’. WiLSHIRE/NORMANDIE8. WII_~HIRE,/WE:SI"ERNo. VERMONT/BEVERLY

1o. VE:RMONT/,~NTA MONICA11. VERMONT/~UNSET12. HOllYWOOD/WESTERN13. HOllYWOOD/VINE14. HOLLYWOOD/HIGHLAND15. UNIVERSAL CITY16. NORTH HOllYWooD

4.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

During the development of this Project, public involvement was encouraged. Aseries of community meetings were held between January 1986 and June 1986.These meetings were held for the Vermont Corridor, Western Avenue Corridor,Fairfax Corridor, Olympic-Pico Corridor, Wilshire Corridor, and HollywoodCorridor (see Attachment 1 for the times and locations). In compliance with theCongressional mandate, and to identify and study candidate alignments that wouldavoid tunneling through any portion of the risk zones identified in the Task ForceReport, SCRTD established the Congressional Ordered Re-Engineering (CORE)Study. The "Task Force Report on the March 24, 1985, Methane Gas Explosion andFire In The Fairfax Area", dated June 10, 1985, identified specific zones wheresubsurface conditions indicated a "potential risk" or "potential high-risk" ofencountering methane gas during subsurface excavations (See Figure 2-3).Accordingly, public input was solicited and received for the CORE Study through aseries of community meetings; public hearings and open committee meetings of theRTD Board of Directors; and briefings with elected officials, business andcommunity organizations and public agencies. SCRTD also established the COREForum to encourage elected officials, entrepreneurs, and community leaders toparticipate in the review process and to comment on the preferred routes andmodes for the realignment of the Metro Rail project. TheCORE Forum had 137members (see Attachment 2) and they met four times (see Attachment 1 for

times and locations).

On February 20, 1987, the public was notified of the completion of the Draft SEIR.Copies of DSEIR were mailed to private individuals, Federal and Local Agencies,and public and major universities libraries within the CORE Study area. RTD helda public hearing on the DSEIR. Letters, comments and questions were receivedfrom the public throughout this period. On April 24, 1987, the SCRTD Board ofDirectors adopted Candidate Alignment 4 (Vermont/Sunset) as the LocallyPreferred Alter~native (LPA). That decision drew major opposition from thebroadcasting industries along Sunset Boulevard. Their major concern was theimpact of noise, vibration and electromagnetic interference on their studios.

On July 13, 1987, the public was notified of the completion ~f a Supplemental EISon Alternative Alignments developed to avoid tunneling under the methane gas risk

zones. Written public comments and responses were received during a 30-daycomment period which closed on August 17, 1987.

On October 1987, the City Council authorized the establishment of an IndependentTechnical Review Panel, comprised of four highly qualified professionals. Mr.

e:\pat\reconsk.doc 3 01/20/94

Frederick Llewellyn chaired the Panel. The other members were Mr. Carl Hanson,Mr. Mas Hatano, and Mr. Ralph Trefney. The Panel was established in order toassure a thorough and independent review of both the SCRTD findings and studioconcerns regarding the potential noise, vibration and electromagnetic interferenceimpacts on the operation of recording and broadcasting studios on Sunset

Boulevard. The Panel met three times (see Attachment 1 for times and locations).They conducted meetings in a public setting and all parties were afforded the fullopportunity to testify and to provide information relevant to its charges. Thefindings of the Independent Technical Review Panel were presented to theTransportation and Traffic Committee of the Los Angles City Council on November

13, 1987.

On November 17, 1987, the Draft SEIS/SEIR was made available to the public anda public hearing was scheduled for December 18, 1987. Public comments andresponses were received until January 2, 1988.

On December 17, 1987, the comment period for the Draft SEIS/SEIR was extendedfrom January 2 1988 to January 27, 1988 in order to allow more time for publicinput. On January 28, 1988, in addition to the other five candidate alignments theBoard authorized consideration of Candidate Alignment 6 to mitigate the impact ofthe Sunset Boulevard alignment on broadcasters. On May 20, 1988, an Addendumto the Draft SEIS/SEIR was made available to the publiiz’and a public hearing wasscheduled for Tuesday, June 21, 1988. Following the public hearing on June 21,1988, the City Planning Commission adopted Candidate Alignment 1 - Modified asthe new LPA and on July 14, 1988, the SCRTD Board also adopted CandidateAlignment 1 - Modified as the new LPA for inclusion in the Final SEIS/SEIR. TheFinal SEIS/SEIR was made available to the public in July 1989.

01/20/94e:\pat\reconsk.doc 4

ATTACHMENT 1

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT IN 1986JANUARY MARCH ’APRIL MAY [UNE ULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 9CTOBER NOVEMBER

Milestone 4

First round of

eight

Community

held b/w Jen. 29

end Feb. 3

Wed,, Jan. 29,

1986 et 7 pro,

tour public

We|tern Ave.

Corridor:

International

Brotherhood of

Wotkera H~II.

4189W. 2nd St.

F~irlax Corridor:

Women’~

Council House,

543 N. Fnirlox

Vermonl Co~ridor;

~re~tlr Lo~

Angeles Press

FEBRUARYRevised

Milestone I

Report for

PCP,

Feb, I. 1986.

three

meetlnge

were held

in the

Corridors

of Western

Ave..

OIymplclPico,

end

Vermont.

Feb. 3, 1986,

another

meeting

wes held in

the Fe|rfex

Corridor.

These

meetingl

were held

the January

meetings.

Milestone 3

Interim

Report for

PC on

Cendidete

Alignments

end Stations

for Further

Study.

March 11.

Iolal of B

Community

meetings

were held,

Comments

an d

wire

received.

’At Fe]rfex

Corridor:

Meetings

were held

,12 p,m and

7 p.m et

Yeblon

Culturel

Center. 721

Beverly Blvd.

Vermont

April 7 - Notice

of Intent to

prepare s SEIS

for Publicedon

in the Federel

Register.

Millstone Z

Report for the

Subsurface

Conditions

Study.

Milestone 3

Dreft

Summery

Reporl for PC

on 2nd Level

Evaluetlon of

Alignments

end Sletionl.

April 29. Six

Communuity

Meetings

were held.

Comments

end Questions

wore received.

Milestone 1 ¯

RTD

Responses

to Public

Comments

end

Questions.

Milestone 3

Draft Interim

Report No. Z

for PC on

Initiel

Rooking of

Cendidete

Alignments.

Daily News.

Miy 8.

Home ̄

Owners

VOW ’No

Eleveted

Real Line on

Wllshire ".

Tue, May

13, 1986, st

RTD Boerd

Room,

Public

Nesting on

the

Draft Interim

Roport No.

;1 fo~ PC on

Operable

Segments

’Anliylll.

TuI~ June

’24.

meetings

lwere held

both in the

ilternoon

end

evening at

W~lehlre

81vd,

Temple to

define end

inelyzl the

operible

segments

for lech

Clndidete

etlgnment .

loiter from

Zev

Yeroelevsky

=eking for

Tue, July 8,

meeting with

LAConservecy

on Historic

Relourcel.

RTD

Responses

to Public

Commentl

end

Ques~one.

Wed, Oct 15,

Chennel 2 le

critical of the

LA Subway.

Dr. Abraham

Fellck,

;heirmen of

the Coalition

Ior Rep d

Tr enlist give

hie reply

regerdlng the

Metro Rail

project.

Oct. 28 ¯ The

lUggeltlOnl

Forum

Contact.

Core Forum

Wed, Nov 6

2 p.m at Mldtown

Hllt~.

questions from

title Core Forum,

Nov 13, Letter

woe lent tO Core

Forum

Participants with

en ettachment

regarding the

Cendldete

Alignments.

Nov 14,

Pub|leaden of

Notice of Intent to

Prepare ¯ GElS In

Locd

Newlpepors. Nov

17, Sr.hedule for

CORE SEIR/S from

Dreft to FineL

Core Forum #2

Wed, Nov 19 at

2 p.m at Mldtown

Hlh~n.

DECEMBERDec 4, Boerd of

Public Works

pc=ted notices.

Dec 5, letter

wee milled tO

Score Forum

Pertlclpente.

Core Forum #3

Tue, De(; 16 it

?.m It

MIdTown

Hilton.

c:\pat:\pub86.xls Page I of 3 PCP - Public Coniul~tioo Plen PC’ - Public Consultation 1/20/94

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT IN 1986JANUARY

Club, 600 N.

Olympic/Pico

Corridor:

Angelel High

School Calelezia

4650 W. OIympic

Blvd.

The rllponlel

Io public

FEBRUARY

to public

come=nee

we! clio

)roved=d,

Corridor:

Meellnge wet

held el 12 p.

ind 7 p,m el

Children=

Ho=pilel of

Lie Angelic

4570

Sunlit Blvd.

APRIL

Hollywood

Cotridoz:

Meeting=

weze held el

12:10 p.m end

7:10 p.m el

use Club.

IG41 Ivir Ave,

Wilihire CocHdor:

held el 1Z:10

p.m end 7:10

p,m I| Willhlfl

Blvd. Temple.

In ~HI.

= Ceu~¢ilm~n

iIiII~i

Of A~ignment J. HI

u~ged Ihem to

telephone

¢lmpllgn end

wllll I IIItlr tO

.Mlyol ~rldley, L.~.

MAY

=velue|lon

of four

cendidlte

illgnmenl

being

coneldered

in the CORE

Study.

Mey 13.

Letter from

Certhey

Ci~,¢le

Homeownez=

AIIOC,

reiteretlng

oppoehlon

tO the

end-o|-Ihe.line

$lilJon It

Felrlix end

Wil=hir=.

Tue. Mey 20.

meeting=

were held In

the elternoon

end evening

el

Wilehlr t

Blvd.

other

Io I Feh’lex

line etetion.

AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER

Core Study

Publle Meeting

on Thur, Nov 20

el 12 p.m and 7

p.m il Wllehlre

Blvd. Temple,

Slxford Hell.

Nov 21.

Publ~cetlonl of

Notice of

Prepi~edon of

SEIR on Dally

Newe |VenNuyeL

Chinese

New=.

Frldiy. Nov 21,

Nolle= o| Intent to

Propero m SEIR

were eent to

Indtv|du =b, and

illencleeo

Tue, Nov 2E,

memo Wee lint

to Reviewing

=geneSes

CORE Iludy. $CH#

BBl12S08.

9ECEMBER

I~P - Public Con~ull~do~ Plan PC’ - Public Cuneulca|ion I/~0/94

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT[ANIIARY FEBRUARY MARClt APRIL ~,IAY IUNE IULY

City Council Pro=.

Ru=lel end Pre~,

opposition to the

eerisl ptoposll.

Temple to

review (he

Initial

technical

ranking of

the 4

cenditate

~lignmentl.

~UGUST

IN 1986;EPTEMBER OCTOBER ~IOVEMBER DECEMBER

Agencies have

30 days of receipt

of the notice to

Nov 26. Ads 1or

SFIR ware in

Nilehlro Preee.

Hollywood

Ind,pendI~nt..srchmon¢

Chronicle.

Nov 27, Ado for

SEIR was In LA

Sentinel.

1120194¢:\put:\pub86.xls Page 3 of 3 PCP = Public Coa&ult=don Plan PC - Pub~,i¢ Conlul~=don

|

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVIVIENT INJANUARY

the NOP.

leller to

;he CORE

Forum

P~rllcipanta

Io come I0

the nell

FEBRUARY

CORE Meeting #4

at 1:30 p.m el

Midlown Hilton

Holel on

February 4. 1987.

Letters from the

Public expressing

their oppoeilion

to the Metro Rail

along Willhir a,

and-el-line

alatlon it

Fair flx-Wilahire,

and Hollywood.

Feb 20. 1987,

$CRTD pelted

eignl on buaee

to notify the

Public about the

Notice o| Compla.

lion of DEEIR and

public hearing.

Sunday, Feb 22,

LA Herald

Examiner and

Daily News

published an ed

for public hearing

on DSEIR.

MARCH

!March 6 and 7.

41,000 Rider

Bulletina were

distributed on all

bus lanai about

the hearing on

DSEIR.

Acknowledgement

Item the Stale

ClaeHng House

thai DSEIR wee

Agancias for

review from Feb

25, 1987 to April 1C

1987

Public Hearing it

10 a.m el RTD on

March 14. 1987 to

conaider comments

on DSEIR.

March 18. 1987,

Comments ind

Responses from

the Public hearing

oh DSEIR.

L~,.ttora from the

Public on DSEIR.

APRIL

More Public

responlel on

DSEIR.

April 6. 1987.

PAC adoplld

Candidale

Alignmanl //4 by

majority VOte.

April 10. 1987,

the Still

Claaringhouae

returned

commentl on

DSEIR Item

aganlcas.

April 22. 1987.

City of LA

Planning Dept.

responded to

quoaflone end

commentl on

DSEIR.

April 23. 1987.

KNX ICBS Radiol,

KTLA. FOX TV on

behalf of KTTV.

KMPC ind KUTE

opposed to

bulilding Metro

IMAY

More Public

Commentl

JUNE

More Public

Commante

and

Responses;

and replies

from RTD.

Ottil

Handricks

WJJ I| the

Hollywood

Mobility

Action

Commillee

Meeting

that

held in June

3, 1987 at I

im at Rm

1200. City

Hill

tO d|iCUll

Metro Rill

alignments

through

HollywOod.

JULY

July 13, 1987, =

tO State Sac. Of

Resources In

regard to "Notice

of Intent to

;Prepare a

EEIS on

Alternative

Alignments.

Wrlltan -

comments .were

received during

= 30-day

comment period

which closed on

Auguat 17, 1987.

Legal Ad ¯Nodce

of Inlanl to

Prepare SEIS:

July 16. 1987 -

Publication dale

in the LA Times,

July 17. 1887 -

Publication date

in the Dally Nawa

July 18, 1987 ¯

Publication data

in the Chinese

Dally News. LA

AUGUST

Aug. 10- 12, 1987

commenta wire

received from CBS,

KTLA, FOX TV.

Golden West

8roidcaltlrl ind

Eunllt Blvd Coalition

on eElS expressing

their oppoalliona to

Metro Rill along

Eunaal Blvd.

More Public

:ommlntl on

SEI8,Thur.. Aug. 27. 1987.

Public Hearing on the

Adoption of a

NagltJve Dacllration

for the rallignment

of a segment of

MOB.1.

Aug. 11, 1987, Ottie

Hendrlcks attended

the Hollywood Action

CommJtae Melting

hal was held at

Yameshbo

Reaturenl, 1989 N,

lycimoce Ave.,

Hollywood et 10 am

1987SEPTEMBER

Sept 8, 1987.

letter was

received from

CBS urging

UMTA and RTD

to re-measure

the impact of

noise in

itudios under

broadcasting

conditlona il

their earlier

wore not valid.

OCTOBER

Roaponao

tO a letter

from a

student

regarding

the Metro

Rail

Project

Independent

Technical

Review

Plnll #1

Meeting

waa held

on Thur.

Oct. 8,

1987. at

9:15 am at

Rm 305.

City Hall.

The purpoaa

was to

diacuaa the

Impact of

Nolle,

Vibration ind

Electro -

magnatlo

Intarlarance

on Studios.

NOVEMBER

Independent

Technical Review

Penal #3 Meeting wee

held on Thur. Nov. 5,

1987. at 9 sm at

Holiday Inn, 1755 N.

Hlglend Avenue,

Hollywood. The

purpose was to

:discuss the Noise,

Vibration,

magnetic ieluas Ind

conduelona drlwn

|rein analysis.

Dra|t SEIR/SEIS end

1983 FEIS were

IVllieble effective

Nov. 17. 1987 end

written comments

were received

until Jan 2. 1988.

Legal AD - Notice

of Avellebilty of

Draft EEI$/SEIR &

Public Hearing;

Nov 17, 1987.

Publicetlondete in

Herald Examiner

J~y18,1987-

Publicidondate in

DECEMBER

Dec 17, 1987,

Comment

Period for the

Draft SEIS/SEIR

from Jan 2,

1988 to Jan 27

1988 in order to

time |or the

Public to

this complex

undertaking

Public Haidng

on Drelt

SEISISEIR at 10

e.m. on Dec 18.

1987 et RTD

|oard Room

and minute==

lot the

meeting WaS

rrovlded,

e:\pat:\pub87.xls Page I of 2 1/20194

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT IN 1987JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH’ APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGusT SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

Wed. F=b 25. LA

Opinion publi=had

en ed lot public

hearing on DSEIR.

Thur. feb 26. LA

Senllnel end

Eaetside Sun

)ublilhed

an ed for public

hearing on DSEIR.

Friday. Feb 27,

Beverly Hille

Courier

lubli=hed

en ed for public

hearing on DSEIR,

Coplee o| the

DSEIR were

= veil=hie effective

Feb. 20. 1987 at

RTD. LA Publ;c

Libr =flee and

Major

Unlv=,rsitiSl

Libraries.

received until

IApril 7. 1987.

March 23, 1987.

Project Are=

Committee (PACi

Hollywood Redev-

elopmenl Project

met to discuss

: the "P osition

Statement lot

Alignment

Prelsrence thru

~Hollywood’.

Blvd. se h will

hOleS end =ound

vibretlone.

Opinion, Rafu

Shlmpo. and the

Korean Times.

July 22, 1987 ¯

Public=elan data’

in th=, Meredith

N=,wspapers:

Hollywood

independent,

Wesllske Poll,

Wilehirs Indepe-

ndent, Wilehl.fe

Prise and t

Central Newl

Wave-Southwest

Iweva.

=,nd girl them a

good overview ol the

Metro Rail Alignment

in Hollywood

=,llo =.bout the public

participation.April 24. 1987,

the 8CRTD Board

of Director, ,

adopted

Cendidels

Alignment #4 =e

the Locally

Proferred

Alternative ILPAI

April 30. 1987,

the SCRTD Bo=rd

adopted e

Subsequent

emonded

’July 23, 1987 -

,Publication dale

in the Sentinel.

More Public

SEI$,

Aug. 31. 1987.

Wilton, Ihrig &

Alao~ella

rA~ouellcel

ConeullentsJ

gave $CRTD

Ih=,lr r=,port

that we=, done

on the Noisa

CB~ Studio on

Aug. 18. 1988.

Independent

Technical

Reviaw Psnsl

#2 Meeting

was, held on

Wad, Oct. 21,

1987 it 7:30

am Rm 305,

City Hall. The

purpose Wll

tO diecusa the

Assess- mane

o! Noise Ind

Vibration

along Suns,el.

LA Tim=e, ~

Opinion (Spinach),

Refu Shlmpo

IEngliah],

Arm=,nlin Paper

July 19, 1987 ¯

Publi¢idon dale in

Eastern Group

Publications.

Certifies,to of

Trinamiasion/

Delivery of Draft

srdSlSEIR to the

Pub=is,

Nantes of Public

agencies, end

officlele;

bueir~eseas,

Cocpocetlone end

Civio

OrgonJzeUona; and

Private C~en~

who provided

teiUm~y ~

written eommenta

on the Drift

SFJS/SEIR.

¢:\pai:\pub87.xls Pag¢ 2 of 2 I/20/9 4

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT INFEBRUARY MARCH APRIL

Fsb, 1988 April 20, Addlndum to

an article 1988. thirl Drift SEI$1SEIR

in the wel I Well Ivllllble

Metro ricommsn, effective Miy 20,

News dillon for 1988 lnd written

8ullslin the Bolrd comments were

1iliad " Io rscslved until July

CORE "Consider 7. 1988

Study Modificltion Sit., Mly 21. 1988

Nears to CORE an Ad for

Comple- ;Study Notice of

lion’. Thl Candidate Avlilabllity of

article said Alignment Addendum to thl

Ihet Public 6" Drift SEIS/SEIR Ind

Input helps IPublio Hiiring

shape wls publishld in

Metro Rail the Herild

route Examiner.

beyond Sun., Mly 22. 1988

first WaS the

segment. Publication dell in

the LA Times.

Thur., May 2.6 1988

wls the

Publicition date in

the Chinese Dlily

News.

Miy 23, 1888. thor

JANUARY

Jan 28, 1988,

the Board

of Candidate

Alignment 6

along with

the other five

candidate

allgnmsntl in

the CORE

Study Draft

ISEISISEIR) to

(hi Sunlit

Bird

MAY JUNE JULY

Thur., June 9, 1988, Mike Woo end

Nile Holden released e report which

tilled for en underground Metro Rill

Alignment due to the high colt of

icquiring lind needed for lerlal

stitlons ind rilocltlon of residents

and busJnislll.

June 14. 1988. acknowledgement

from the Stile Clearing House thor

the Addendum to the Drift SEISlSEIR

wls sent 1o Stele Agencies for

irevlew from May 5, 1987 to July

1987.

Thur.. Juno 16, 1988, the Planning

Commiislon approved and

recommended thlt the City Council

adopts Modified Alignment I.

Public Hearing on Addendum to the

DrMt $EISISEIR at 10 e.m. on Tul.,

June 21, 1988 it RTD Board Room.

Minutil end sign up sheet fo~ the

misting was providld.

The purpose of this addendum to the

Drift SEISlSEIR wal to prolon¢ the

technical characterlsticl end

environmental Impacts of CA 6. It

lllo mltlgitll the potintlll

Invlromentsl Impacts of the

Segment of CA 4. blw Vermont/8into

Mon~ce 8laden and

More.Public

rllp0nlll on the

Add;ndum to the

Draft SEIS/SEIR.

July 13. 1988, Susinne

B. Gifford IGinerll

CounlelJ isked for in

advice from Bird,

Mirelil, Boxer,

Wolpert end Mitz on

how tO proceed with

the Final SEIS/SEIR

which will contain in

LPA (CA1-MI that wls

not specifically

Included In the Draft

documents but was

composed from

elements of Other

lJtlrnltlVll thlt werl

fully diloulsld in the

Drift documents.

July 14, 1988, the

SCRTD Bolrd of

Dlrecto~l adopted

Candidate AlJgnmant

1-Modified (CALM| as

the revised LPA.

1988AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT INJANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH [APRIL MAY JUNE JULY

ifor the Board to

"Consider

Selection of the

LPA and IncludMg

Segment 2 in

reference of

Addendum to the

Draft SEISISEIR. It

Is recommended

thee the Board

adopt e 17,6 mile.

ell-subway line.

with 15 stations.

including the five

etstlone along

MOS-1.

May 31. 1989. lares

hem the Bunter

Blvd. Coalition

requemting s 30

minute

preesntetlon Ior 7

lplaklrl It the

June 2let hasting.

lUni,ver=.sl CityTu*.. June 21, 1988, following the

=Public Hearing. the City Planning

Commission unanimously sdopted

Modified Alignment 1.

The LACTC was informed to make

their recommendation on S levlead

LPA to 8CRTD Board by July 14, 1998.

The 8CRTO Board of Directors will

select an LPA end Including Segment

2 ind full funding contract for theascend phase o| Metro Rail will be

exacuted blw the SCRTD ind the

Fadarsl Oovernmen! blf Octobsr I.

1988.

June 24, 1988, there was =

recommendation for the Bosrd to

"Consider 8alectlon of the LPA and

Including Segment 2 lot the CORE

Study Flnsl 8EISlSEIR’. It I=

recommended that the Bolrd select

CORE Study Candidate Alignment 1 -

Modified ICA1M) es the new LPA

wld¢~ I= a 17.’/ndie, all Subway lens,

hss 18 etstiona0 Including the five

etstiona ==long MOS.1 Inltisl segment.

Signed petitions end more letters

from the publio in levee of oil subway

route through Hollywood Blvd.

1988AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

e:\pat\pub88.xls Page 2 of 2 1/20/94

ATTACHMENT 2

The CORE Forum membership is as follows:

Mr. David AbelDavid Abel & Associates

Ms. Caroline AhmansonBeverly-Wilshire Hotel

The Honorable Richard AlatorreCouncilmember0 City of Los Angeles

Mr. George AllenWilshire Chamber of Commerce

The Honorable Michael AntonovichBoard of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles

Mr. Richard AtkinsHollywood Heritage

The Honorable Jacki BacharachCouneilmember, City of Rancho Palos Verdes

Steven BangsHollywood Heights Association

Mr. Joel BakerCentury City Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Neil BarryMid-City Chamber of Commerce

Ms. Rita BarschakLeague of Women Voters

The Honorable Anthony BeilensonU.S. Congress

The Honorable Howard BermanU.S. Congress

The Honorable Ernani BernardiCouncilmember, City of Los Angeles

The Honorable Hal BernsonCouncilmember, City of Los Angeles

The Honorable Tom BradleyMayor, City of Los Angele~

The Honorable Marvin Braude

Councilmember, City of Los Angeles

Mr. Loren BrownS~les/Marketing, Los Angeles Midtown Hilton

Mr. William CallenderCalfed, Inc.

Mr. Marshall CaskeyMarshall Caskey, Attorney

Mr. Kenneth K. ChangDelta Partnership Pacific Ltd.

Ms. Sandi ChesterHollywood Presbyterian Medical Center

Mr. William ChristopherMiracle Mile Residential Association

Mr. Nathan L. ChromanTransportation Commissioner, City of Los Angeles

Ms. LynMacewen CohenMiracle Mile Residential Association

Ms. Gwen ColemanLos Angeles Urban League

Mr. Keith ComrieChief Administrative Officer, City of. Los Angeles.

Ms. Karen ConstineKaiser Permanente Contrex Building

Mr. Rot CoxWilshire Center Community Involvement Association

The Honorable Deane DanaBoard of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles

Ms. Anne Del ValleNorth Hollywood Project Area Committee

The Honorable Julian DixonU.S. Congress

Mr. John DyerSCRTD

The Honorable Edmund D. EdelmanBoard of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles

Mr. Geoffrey ElyBuilding Owners and Managers Association

The Honorable Robert Farrell


The Honorable John Ferraro


Commissioner Betty FisherLos Angeles County Regional Planning Commission

The Honorable Joan Milke Flores


Mr. Frank Foster

Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles

Mr. Paul D. Freedman

Beverly-Fairfax Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Daniel P. GarciaLos Angeles Planning Commission

Mr. Steve D. Gavin

Greater Los Angeles Transportation Commission

Ms. Barbara Goen

KCET-TV

Mr. Richard Goette

Oxford Square Homeowners Association

The Honorable Kenneth Hahn

Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles

Mr Mark Hall

Archiplan

Mr. James Hankla

Chief Administrative Officer, County of Los Angeles

Mr. Stanley Hart

Sierra Club

Mr. Anthony Hays

Boulevard Heights Homeowners Association

Mr Henry Hilty

A.F. Gilmore Co.

Mr Donald Howery

General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Transportation

Mr. Jon JerdeJerde Partnership

Mr. Arland JohnsonHollywood Business Community

Mr.. Raymond JohnsonNAACP

Mr. Harold KatzLos Angeles West Chamber of Commerce

The Honorable Richard KatzAssemblyman, California State Assembly

Ms. Lydia KennardKDG Development

Mr. Ted KltosDeputy to Mayor of West Hollywood (S. Schulte)

Mr. James J. KrochkaAttorney, Trust Services of America, Inc.

Ms. Ruth Ann LehrerLoS Angeles Conservancy

The Honorable Gilbert W. LindsayCouncil~ember, City of Los Angeles

Mr. Norris D. LineweaverHollywood Project A/ea Committee, Los Angeles ,Cq=s~..unity RedevelopmentAgency ....

Mr. Allan LowyAllan N. Lowy, Attorney

Mr. Nicholas LuceroLos Angeles Boys and Girls Club

Mr. Michael HalakVariety Magazine

Ms. Nlna MaloneLos Angeles City College

The Honorable Burr MargollnAssemblyman, California State Assembly

Mr. Carl MasuonCarl Maston, Architect

Mr. Bud MarhisBuilding and Construction Trades Council

Ms. ChrlstyJohnson McAvoyHollywood Heritage

4

Mr. Jack McCarleyPublic Relations, Bullocks Department Store

Mr. William R. McCarleyCh°ief Legislative Analyst, City of Los Angeles

Mr. Bill McGregorTooley Company

Ms. Marsha MednickVan Nuys Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Kurt MeyerKurt Meyer Partners, Inc.

Mr. Brian MooreHillside Federation

Mr. Hugo MorrisTeamsters Union Joint Council, ~2

Mr. Winston V. MorrowTICOR

Mr. Norman MurdockDirector, Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning

Mr. Dale NealLatham-Watkins

Mr. Thomas NelsonConsulting Engineer

Mr. Jerry M. NemiroBullocks Wilshire

Mr. William NerenbergAlia Management

Mr. Robert NorvetCBS, Inc,

M~. Jim OrtnerSouthern California Automobile Association

Mr. Doyle PeckBraille Institute

Dr. James PeoplesLos Angeles County Museum of Art

Ms. Betty PetersUnited States Borax and Chemical Corporation

The Honorable Joy Picus


Mr. Mark PisanoSouthern California Association of Governments

Ms. Diana PlotkinBeverly Wilshire Homeowners Association

Mr. Manning Post ICentral Business DiStrict Redevelopment Project Citizen AdvisoryCommission.

Mr. Wayne RatkovitchRatkovitch, Bowers, Inc.

Mr. Ray RemyPresident, Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Rick RichmondExecutive Director, Los Angeles County TransportationCommission

The Honorable Alan RobbinsSenator, California State Senate

The Honorable David RobertiPresident Pro Tempore, Cal.ifornia State Senate

Mr. William RobertsonAFL-CIO

The Honorable Mike RoosAssemblyman, California State Assembly

The Honorable Herschel RosenthalSenator, California State Senate

Mr. Charles RosinCarthay Circle Homeowners Association

Mr. Alan RossTimes Mirror Inc.

Mr. Kenneth C. RossChildrenes Hospital of Los Angeles

The Honorable Edward RoybalU.S. Congress

Mr. Gary RussellThe Stakeholders

The Honorable Pat RussellCouncilmember, City of LOs Angeles

Mr. George P. Rutland

California Federal Savings and Loan Association

Ms. Lois SaffianLeague of Wome~oters

The Honorable Peter F. Schabarum

Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles ¯

Mr. Phillip SehiliroAide to Representative Waxman

The Honorable Stephen Schulte

Mayor, City of West Hollywood

Ms. Debra Serdutz

ScientologyMissions International

Mr. John Shirey

Assistant Chief Administrative Officer, County of Los Angeles

Mr. Alan Sieroty

Wilshire Boulevard Property Owner’s Coalition

Mr. Dan Silverman

Federation, CRC

Mr. Owen Smith

Sounh Brookside Homeowners Association

Mr. Bill Snyder

The Greater LOs Angeles Press~Club

The Honorable Charlotte Spadaro

Mayor, City of Beverly Hills

Mr. Chris Stewart

Central City Association

Mr. Henry Sulzberger

May Company California

Ms. Georgette Todd

Hollywood Library

Mr. Ken Topping

Los Angeles Department of Planning

M~. Betty Trotter

League of Women Voters

Mr. John Tuite

Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Association

The Honorable Joel Wachs~

7


The Honorable Diane Watson

Senator, California State Senate

The Honorable Henry Waxman

U.S. Congress

Mr. Gerald Weisstein

Bank of Los Angeles

Mr. John H. Welborne

Adams Dugue & Hazeltine, Attorneys

Mr. Bill Welsh

Hollywood Chamber of Commerce

Mr. Steve WilsonFremont Place Homeowners Association

Ms. Kathy Wong

Beverly-Fairfax Chamber of Commerce

The Honorable Michael WooCou~cilmember, City of Los Angeles

Mr. Richard WorkmanWindsor Village Association

The Honorable Zev Yaroslavsky

Councilmember, City of LOs Angeles

Mr. Charles E. Young

Chancellor, UCLA

8

june 13, 1995 board of directors metropolitan...

Documents