june 2013 - new york state division of criminal …...3 crtf track i admissions, july 2012 – june...

County Re-entry Task Force Program Activity Report:

July 2012 – June 2013

Data provided by County Re-entry Task Forces to the Division of Criminal Justice Services, Office of Justice Research and Performance as of

September 18, 2013

For the Following Counties: Albany, Bronx, Broome, Dutchess, Erie, Kings, Manhattan, Monroe,

Nassau, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange, Rensselaer, Rockland, Schenectady, Suffolk, Ulster, and Westchester

Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Justice Research and Performance

This report includes information on CRTF activity during the 2012-2013 contract year, which includes information on Track I clients, the higher-risk prison releases served by the CRTFs.

This project was supported by Grant No. 2011-BJ-CX-K042 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.

2

CRTF Track I (T1) Admissions, July 2012 – June 2013

There were 3,623 Track I clients admitted to the CRTFs during the 2012-2013 contract year. Overall, the CRTFs met 90% of their Track I intake goal for the contract year, with several CRTFs exceeding their individual goals..

County

Min Req per

Year

Min Req per

Month

Jul-12

Aug-12

Sep-12

Oct-12

Nov-12

Dec-12

Jan-13

Feb-13

Mar-13

Apr-13

May-13

Jun-13

T1 Annual Intakes

n % goal met

Albany 245 20 24 26 26 27 24 27 24 17 12 9 13 9 238 97% Bronx 125 10 0 0 0 0 1 3 6 15 13 20 31 36 125 100% Broome 127 11 17 16 26 21 12 18 13 19 12 21 13 12 200 157% Dutchess 63 5 6 11 0 0 0 0 10 10 19 13 7 10 86 137% Erie 460 38 26 16 12 12 20 19 18 20 29 36 39 28 275 60% Kings 250 21 18 27 24 41 31 39 41 16 35 36 16 21 345 138% Manhattan 250 21 16 7 4 12 14 16 34 10 16 31 14 25 199 80% Monroe 442 37 10 27 12 20 7 9 19 24 27 32 18 30 235 53% Nassau 207 17 31 20 15 19 11 16 29 23 13 15 19 13 224 108% Niagara 125 10 7 5 11 13 14 13 22 16 13 8 12 12 146 117% Oneida 143 12 12 17 18 17 3 27 19 19 11 15 11 7 176 123% Onondaga 338 28 19 18 18 30 23 20 28 26 36 25 19 29 291 86% Orange 176 15 34 28 12 13 21 17 20 17 15 14 12 14 217 123% Rensselaer 100 8 14 7 12 13 4 6 6 5 6 9 6 9 97 97% Rockland 60 5 9 7 8 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 65% Schenectady 148 12 12 14 14 12 16 12 6 7 8 11 12 13 137 93% Suffolk 455 38 15 12 11 31 33 15 19 24 27 31 40 25 283 62% Ulster 125 10 7 10 4 6 11 9 11 11 14 19 14 13 129 103% Westchester 175 15 17 15 15 15 13 14 20 8 23 14 18 9 181 103% Total 4,014 335 294 283 242 311 263 281 345 287 329 359 314 315 3,623 90%

*Bronx began accepting clients in November 2012. Dutchess first admitted clients under the renegotiated contract in January 2013. Rockland’s CRTF was inactive during the third and fourth quarters of the contract year, with no intakes or discharges from January 2013 to June 2013.

3

CRTF Track I Admissions, July 2012 – June 2013 (cont’d)

24% of Track I clients admitted to the CRTFs were under 25 years old. For county specific Track I client age information, see page 9.

(6%) of Track I clients were female. For county specific Track I client sex information, see page 9.

17 & under15

<1%

18-24 years86224%

25-34 years1,39739%

35-49 years1,01328%

50+ years3369%

Age of Track I Clients: 2012-2013 Contract Year Admissionsn=3,623

Male3,36593%

Female2246%

Unknown341%

Sex of Track I Clients: 2012-2013 Contract Year Admissionsn=3,623

4


Nearly all (96%) Track I clients were moderate to high risk offenders (88%) or sex offenders (8%). For county-level Track I population information, see page 10.

Nearly all (99%) of Track I clients were on parole when admitted to the CRTFs. County-level information can be found on page 12.

Of Track I admissions on parole, case conferences were held for 2,825 (79%). County-level information can be found on page 12.

Moderate to High Risk3,20688%

Juvenile, 9, <1%Woman with High

Need, 94, 3%

Sex Offender, 292, 8%

Impairments Severe Medical, 19, 1%

Maximum Expiration, 3, <1%

Other41712%

Track I Population Composition: 2012-2013 Contract Year Admissions

n=3,623

On Parole3,56899%

Max Exp531%

Other2

<1%

Supervision Status of Track I Clients: 2012-2013 Contract Year Admissions

n=3,623

5


The needs that were most commonly identified by the CRTFs for Track I clients were employment programming (83%) chemical dependency treatment (79%), and social services assistance (78%). See pages 13-14 for additional county specific information.

CRTF Track I Discharges, July 2012 – June 2013

Between July 2012 and June 2013, 2,778 clients were discharged from CRTFs. 1,704 (61%) successfully completed CRTF programs. 619 (22%) were discharged by CRTFs due to a new arrest or parole violation (as reported by the CRTFs). County-level data can be found on page 15.

83% 79% 78%

65%60%

48%37% 35% 35% 31%

24%

9%2%

Identified Service Needs of Track I Clients: 2012-2013 Contract Year Admissions

Successful Completion

1,70461%

Voluntarily Discontinued

37614%

New Arrest/ Violation

61922%

Other Reasons793%

Discharge Reasons for Track I Clients:July 2012 - June 2013 Discharges

n=2,778

6

CRTF Track I Discharges, July 2012 – June 2013 (cont’d)

2,364 (85%) of the clients discharged spent at least 45 days in the CRTFs, with 1,835 (66%) enrolled more than 90 days. See page 23 for county specific information.

818 (30%) of clients discharged from the CRTFs were employed while in the CRTFs, with an additional 195 (7%) reported as unemployable. County-level employment data is available on page 22.

<45 days41415%

45-89 days52919%

90+ days1,83566%

Days Spent in the CRTF by Track I Clients:July 2012 - June 2013 Discharges

n=2,778

Not Employed1,75463%

Unemployable1957%

Employed P/T40115%

Employed F/T41715%

Unknown11

<1%

Employed/ Unemployable

1,02437%

Employment Status of Track I Clients:July 2012 - June 2013 Discharges

n=2,778

7

Program Participation among Track I Discharges*, July 2012 – June 2013

County specific data regarding program participation is located on pages 16-20.

2,292 clients discharged during this time had a need for social services assistance assessed at intake. Of these, 1,896 (83%) had obtained social services assistance prior to discharge.

1,832 clients discharged during this time period had a need for housing assistance assessed at intake. Of these, 1,030 (56%) were in a private residence at discharge.

The following chart shows the proportion of clients who either successfully completed or were still engaged in a program at discharge for the other identified needs.

8% 1%

20%

0%

16% 13% 11%1% 4% 6% 1%

44%48%

28%

39%

21%23% 25%

29%26%

13% 17%

ChemDep Prog

MH TxProg

AngerMgt

Sex OffTx Prog

Cog BehInt

EmployProg

Off AcctProg

Vets Prog FamilySupp Prog

MentoringProg

Ed/VocProg

Percentage of Clients with Assessed Need Who SuccessfullyCompleted or Were Currently Engaged in Programs

Successfully Completed Currently Engaged52%49% 48%

39%37% 36% 36%

30% 30%

18%19%

*For clients who were discharged due to a new arrest or parole violation, program participation status reported by the CRTF is prior to the client’s arrest/violation.

8

Service Gaps, July 2012 – June 2013

In addition to information on housing and social service utilization, needs assessment information is reported for 11 program areas. For each program area, the CRTFs record whether an assessment is conducted as well as the outcome of the assessment. The majority of Track I clients were assessed for all needs areas. Data by county is on pages 13-14.

The following chart shows the proportion of clients who did not have their need met while engaged in the CRTF because an appropriate program does not exist in that county or the client was placed on a waiting list.

The needs areas with the largest proportion of Track I clients who did not get their need met due to lack

of an appropriate program were mentoring (35% of clients with an assessed need), family support (18%), and sex offender treatment (13%). See pages 16-20 for county specific information.

Needs areas with the largest proportion of Track I clients still on the waiting list for a program at discharge were educational/vocational programs (13%) and sex offender treatment (12%). See pages 16-20 for county level data.

35%

13%18%

10%4%

8% 7%3% 3%

9%1%

4%

12% 1%

8%13%

8%8%

8% 7%1%

5%

MentoringProg

Sex OffTx Prog

FamilySupp Prog

Cog BehInt

Ed/VocProg

Off AcctProg

AngerMgt

MH TxProg

EmployProg

Vets Prog ChemDep Prog

Percentage of Clients with Need Who Were Not Enrolled in Programs Due to Lack of Program Availability

No Appropriate Program Client on Waiting List39%

25%

19%18% 17% 16% 15%

11% 10%

6%

10%

9

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Intakes: Age and Sex

County 17 & under 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-49 years 50+ years Total

County Male Female Unknown Total

n % n % n % n % n % n n % n % n % n

Albany 2 1% 67 28% 76 32% 74 31% 19 8% 238 Albany 222 93% 14 6% 2 1% 238

Bronx 0 0% 35 28% 42 34% 32 26% 16 13% 125 Bronx 98 78% 25 20% 2 2% 125

Broome 0 0% 35 18% 99 50% 48 24% 18 9% 200 Broome 179 90% 18 9% 3 2% 200

Dutchess 0 0% 19 22% 25 29% 33 38% 9 10% 86 Dutchess 75 87% 11 13% 0 0% 86

Erie 1 0% 60 22% 104 38% 76 28% 34 12% 275 Erie 253 92% 19 7% 3 1% 275

Kings 0 0% 69 20% 146 42% 109 32% 21 6% 345 Kings 338 98% 4 1% 3 1% 345

Manhattan 0 0% 70 35% 63 32% 50 25% 16 8% 199 Manhattan 195 98% 1 1% 3 2% 199

Monroe 1 0% 54 23% 88 37% 72 31% 20 9% 235 Monroe 222 94% 8 3% 5 2% 235

Nassau 0 0% 57 25% 85 38% 63 28% 19 8% 224 Nassau 210 94% 14 6% 0 0% 224

Niagara 1 1% 30 21% 57 39% 42 29% 16 11% 146 Niagara 137 94% 9 6% 0 0% 146

Oneida 0 0% 37 21% 81 46% 49 28% 9 5% 176 Oneida 173 98% 3 2% 0 0% 176

Onondaga 7 2% 93 32% 123 42% 57 20% 11 4% 291 Onondaga 256 88% 26 9% 9 3% 291

Orange 0 0% 42 19% 90 41% 63 29% 22 10% 217 Orange 208 96% 7 3% 2 1% 217

Rensselaer 0 0% 16 16% 34 35% 33 34% 14 14% 97 Rensselaer 92 95% 4 4% 1 1% 97

Rockland 0 0% 9 23% 19 49% 6 15% 5 13% 39 Rockland 39 100% 0 0% 0 0% 39

Schenectady 0 0% 33 24% 51 37% 37 27% 16 12% 137 Schenectady 126 92% 10 7% 1 1% 137

Suffolk 2 1% 58 20% 104 37% 88 31% 31 11% 283 Suffolk 260 92% 23 8% 0 0% 283

Ulster 0 0% 37 29% 38 29% 36 28% 18 14% 129 Ulster 110 85% 19 15% 0 0% 129

Westchester 1 1% 41 23% 72 40% 45 25% 22 12% 181 Westchester 172 95% 9 5% 0 0% 181

Total 15 0% 862 24% 1,397 39% 1,013 28% 336 9% 3,623 Total 3,365 93% 224 6% 34 1% 3,623

10

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Intakes: Population Composition

County Moderate to High

Risk Sex Offender Woman with High Need Juvenile Impairments

Severe Medical Maximum Expiration Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n

Albany 201 84% 32 13% 3 1% 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 238

Bronx 119 95% 0 0% 6 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 125

Broome 161 81% 25 13% 11 6% 1 1% 1 1% 1 1% 200

Dutchess 77 90% 5 6% 4 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 86

Erie 239 87% 25 9% 8 3% 2 1% 1 0% 0 0% 275

Kings 345 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 345

Manhattan 196 98% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 199

Monroe 218 93% 13 6% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% 235

Nassau 214 96% 2 1% 8 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 224

Niagara 110 75% 30 21% 6 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 146

Oneida 124 70% 51 29% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 176

Onondaga 267 92% 10 3% 9 3% 5 2% 0 0% 0 0% 291

Orange 194 89% 22 10% 1 % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 217

Rensselaer 70 72% 24 25% 1 1% 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 97

Rockland 39 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 39

Schenectady 110 80% 19 14% 7 5% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 137

Suffolk 238 84% 30 11% 14 5% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 283

Ulster 117 91% 2 2% 7 5% 0 0% 3 2% 0 0% 129

Westchester 167 92% 0 0% 7 4% 0 0% 7 4% 0 0% 181

Total 3,205 88% 292 8% 94 3% 9 0% 19 1% 3 0% 3,623

11

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Intakes: Time between DOCCS Release and CRTF Intake

County 7days or less 8-30 days 31-60 days 61-90 days 91-365 days More than 365

days Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n

Albany 183 77% 44 18% 9 4% 0 0% 1 % 1 % 238

Bronx 27 22% 36 29% 20 16% 9 7% 22 18% 11 9% 125

Broome 78 39% 107 54% 8 4% 1 1% 4 2% 2 1% 200

Dutchess 33 38% 21 24% 10 12% 3 3% 10 12% 9 10% 86

Erie 161 59% 75 27% 19 7% 10 4% 10 4% 0 0% 275

Kings 24 7% 136 39% 45 13% 23 7% 80 23% 37 11% 345

Manhattan 71 36% 70 35% 21 11% 7 4% 18 9% 12 6% 199

Monroe 37 16% 64 27% 40 17% 24 10% 48 20% 22 9% 235

Nassau 195 87% 18 8% 4 2% 3 1% 4 2% 0 0% 224

Niagara 103 71% 16 11% 6 4% 7 5% 9 6% 5 3% 146

Oneida 141 80% 25 14% 7 4% 1 1% 2 1% 0 0% 176

Onondaga 264 91% 20 7% 5 2% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 291

Orange 155 71% 26 12% 9 4% 5 2% 15 7% 7 3% 217

Rensselaer 80 82% 8 8% 3 3% 1 1% 5 5% 0 0% 97

Rockland 24 62% 13 33% 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 1 3% 39

Schenectady 106 77% 12 9% 4 3% 0 0% 10 7% 5 4% 137

Suffolk 115 41% 77 27% 27 10% 9 3% 41 14% 14 5% 283

Ulster 46 36% 61 47% 6 5% 4 3% 9 7% 3 2% 129

Westchester 58 32% 73 40% 27 15% 9 5% 9 5% 5 3% 181

Total 1,901 52% 902 25% 270 7% 119 3% 297 8% 134 4% 3,623

12

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Intakes: Supervision Status and Case Conference Status

County On Parole, case

conf On Parole, no

case conf Not on parole,

case conf Not on parole, no

case conf Total County On Parole Max Exp Other Total

n % n % n % n % n n % n % n % n

Albany 214 90% 7 3% 17 7% 0 0% 238 Albany 221 93% 17 7% 0 0% 238

Bronx 28 22% 97 78% 0 0% 0 0% 125 Bronx 125 100% 0 0% 0 0% 125

Broome 193 97% 0 0% 5 3% 2 1% 200 Broome 193 97% 7 4% 0 0% 200

Dutchess 48 56% 38 44% 0 0% 0 0% 86 Dutchess 86 100% 0 0% 0 0% 86

Erie 265 96% 10 4% 0 0% 0 0% 275 Erie 275 100% 0 0% 0 0% 275

Kings 345 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 345 Kings 345 100% 0 0% 0 0% 345

Manhattan 142 71% 56 28% 1 1% 0 0% 199 Manhattan 198 99% 0 0% 1 1% 199

Monroe 39 17% 189 80% 0 0% 7 3% 235 Monroe 228 97% 7 3% 0 0% 235

Nassau 218 97% 6 3% 0 0% 0 0% 224 Nassau 224 100% 0 0% 0 0% 224

Niagara 137 94% 8 5% 0 0% 1 1% 146 Niagara 145 99% 1 1% 0 0% 146

Oneida 146 83% 28 16% 0 0% 2 1% 176 Oneida 174 99% 2 1% 0 0% 176

Onondaga 290 100% 0 0% 1 0% 0 0% 291 Onondaga 290 100% 0 0% 1 0% 291

Orange 72 33% 138 64% 2 1% 5 2% 217 Orange 210 97% 7 3% 0 0% 217

Rensselaer 95 98% 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 97 Rensselaer 95 98% 2 2% 0 0% 97

Rockland 39 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 39 Rockland 39 100% 0 0% 0 0% 39

Schenectady 120 88% 8 6% 8 6% 1 1% 137 Schenectady 128 93% 9 7% 0 0% 137

Suffolk 124 44% 158 56% 0 0% 1 % 283 Suffolk 282 100% 1 0% 0 0% 283

Ulster 129 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 129 Ulster 129 100% 0 0% 0 0% 129

Westchester 181 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 181 Westchester 181 100% 0 0% 0 0% 181

Total 2,825 78% 743 21% 36 1% 19 1% 3,623 Total 3,568 98% 53 1% 2 0% 3,623

13

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Intakes: Service Needs

County Total

Albany Bronx Broome Dutch-ess Erie Kings Man-

hattan Monroe Nassau Niagara Oneida Onon-daga Orange Renss-

elaer Rockland Schen-ectady Suffolk Ulster West-

chester n %

Hou

sing

Need 124 39 103 34 171 34 46 143 136 107 91 171 137 39 8 55 154 81 78 1,751 48% No Need 114 69 97 52 104 311 129 92 88 39 85 117 66 58 31 81 127 48 103 1,811 50% Not Assessed 0 17 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 3 14 0 0 1 2 0 0 61 2%

Em

ploy

Need 218 94 165 79 190 282 159 129 224 133 154 253 174 81 27 120 222 110 176 2,990 83% No Need 19 9 35 7 85 63 22 104 0 13 22 29 11 16 5 14 44 18 5 521 14%

Not Assessed 1 22 0 0 0 0 18 2 0 0 0 9 32 0 7 3 17 1 0 112 3%

Ed/

Voc

Need 72 72 98 31 211 338 131 72 224 78 85 193 63 33 9 67 215 96 96 2,184 60% No Need 165 12 102 55 63 7 49 163 0 68 91 87 132 64 27 67 56 33 85 1,326 37%

Not Assessed 1 41 0 0 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 11 22 0 3 3 12 0 0 113 3%

Soc

Serv

A

ssis

t

Need 218 53 171 66 272 103 92 121 224 145 149 271 193 67 35 116 247 104 177 2,824 78% No Need 20 16 29 20 2 242 89 114 0 1 27 17 8 30 4 21 35 25 4 704 19%

Not Assessed 0 56 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 95 3%

Che

m D

ep T

x Need 137 70 178 73 256 344 126 112 224 128 85 239 158 74 38 106 252 112 166 2,878 79% No Need 101 8 21 13 15 1 54 123 0 18 91 52 41 23 1 30 27 17 15 651 18%

Not Assessed 0 47 1 0 4 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 1 4 0 0 94 3%

Sex

Off

Tx Need 34 4 24 5 21 0 5 13 11 32 37 23 19 25 1 20 29 5 1 309 9%

No Need 203 98 127 81 254 345 174 222 213 114 138 258 192 72 37 117 253 124 180 3,202 88%

Not Assessed 1 23 49 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 1 10 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 112 3%

Off

Acc

t Pro

g Need 40 2 73 2 62 6 5 63 224 130 20 150 50 16 11 49 139 54 18 1,114 31%

No Need 197 99 127 84 210 339 175 172 0 16 156 139 152 77 28 84 132 75 163 2,425 67%

Not Assessed 1 24 0 0 3 0 19 0 0 0 0 2 15 4 0 4 12 0 0 84 2%

Total 238 125 200 86 275 345 199 235 224 146 176 291 217 97 39 137 283 129 181 3,623 100%

14

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Intakes: Service Needs (cont’d)

County Total

Albany Bronx Broome Dutch-ess Erie Kings Man-

hattan Monroe Nassau Niagara Oneida Onon-daga Orange Renss-

elaer Rockland Schen-ectady Suffolk Ulster West-

chester n %

Cog

Beh

Int Need 150 38 145 86 53 344 136 45 224 134 59 167 120 73 10 85 201 104 181 2,355 65%

No Need 88 22 55 0 218 1 61 190 0 12 116 116 76 24 1 50 80 25 0 1,135 31%

Not Assessed 0 65 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 8 21 0 28 2 2 0 0 133 4%

Men

tor

Need 101 4 99 1 19 16 4 2 224 119 2 105 12 89 5 72 83 119 180 1,256 35%

No Need 137 58 101 85 255 329 178 233 0 27 173 182 193 8 24 60 167 10 1 2,221 61%

Not Assessed 0 63 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 0 1 4 12 0 10 5 33 0 0 146 4%

Ang

er M

gt Need 47 38 93 41 73 96 99 82 93 16 2 107 117 24 23 32 110 61 125 1,279 35%

No Need 190 23 107 45 197 249 81 153 130 130 174 182 72 73 16 104 166 68 56 2,216 61%

Not Assessed 1 64 0 0 5 0 19 0 1 0 0 2 28 0 0 1 7 0 0 128 4%

Men

tal H

ealth

T

x

Need 35 20 39 34 72 33 19 45 65 45 46 82 35 28 8 55 63 99 47 870 24%

No Need 201 50 161 52 202 312 160 190 158 101 129 200 159 69 31 80 210 29 134 2,628 73%

Not Assessed 2 55 0 0 1 0 20 0 1 0 1 9 23 0 0 2 10 1 0 125 3%

Fam

Sup

p Need 81 6 117 7 168 6 57 51 224 100 3 162 27 38 2 68 38 95 97 1,347 37%

No Need 157 80 83 79 104 339 123 183 0 46 172 129 177 59 30 68 240 34 84 2,187 60%

Not Assessed 0 39 0 0 3 0 19 1 0 0 1 0 13 0 7 1 5 0 0 89 2%

Vet

s Pro

g

Need 4 0 7 2 9 1 6 0 3 3 3 5 6 5 0 8 7 9 2 80 2%

No Need 234 104 80 84 265 344 173 235 221 143 173 286 206 92 39 122 274 120 179 3,374 93%

Not Assessed 0 21 113 0 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 7 2 0 0 169 5%

Total 238 125 200 86 275 345 199 235 224 146 176 291 217 97 39 137 283 129 181 3,623 100%

15

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Discharge Reasons

County

Successful Discharge

Voluntarily Discontinued New Arrest Violation Deceased Transferred to

other CRTF area Moved to non-

CRTF area Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n

Albany 190 77% 5 2% 2 1% 42 17% 1 % 7 3% 0 0% 247

Bronx 33 77% 0 0% 6 14% 4 9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 43

Broome 185 79% 0 0% 4 2% 43 18% 0 0% 1 % 0 0% 233

Dutchess 9 45% 0 0% 0 0% 11 55% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 20

Erie 110 53% 22 11% 9 4% 44 21% 0 0% 6 3% 15 7% 206

Kings 39 13% 231 76% 0 0% 24 8% 0 0% 2 1% 6 2% 302

Manhattan 130 71% 26 14% 9 5% 10 5% 1 1% 4 2% 3 2% 183

Monroe 16 17% 30 32% 2 2% 46 48% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 95

Nassau 11 37% 0 0% 0 0% 17 57% 0 0% 2 7% 0 0% 30

Niagara 22 40% 0 0% 3 5% 26 47% 0 0% 4 7% 0 0% 55

Oneida 167 84% 1 1% 17 9% 14 7% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 200

Onondaga 186 70% 9 3% 23 9% 44 17% 0 0% 0 0% 4 2% 266

Orange 102 57% 15 8% 0 0% 59 33% 0 0% 2 1% 1 1% 179

Rensselaer 58 65% 0 0% 5 6% 19 21% 1 1% 5 6% 1 1% 89

Rockland 27 75% 0 0% 1 3% 8 22% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 36

Schenectady 91 68% 3 2% 7 5% 28 21% 0 0% 4 3% 0 0% 133

Suffolk 110 65% 18 11% 4 2% 35 21% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 168

Ulster 59 63% 13 14% 10 11% 11 12% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 94

Westchester 159 80% 3 2% 13 7% 19 10% 0 0% 0 0% 5 3% 199

Total 1,704 61% 376 14% 115 4% 504 18% 3 % 39 1% 37 1% 2,778

16

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status at CRTF Discharge*

County Total

Albany Bronx Broome Dut-chess Erie Kings Man-

hattan Monroe Nassau Nia-gara Oneida Onon-

daga Orange Renss-elaer

Rock-land

Schen-ectady

Suf-folk Ulster West-

chester n %

Hou

sing

No Need 61 12 52 2 74 272 79 7 3 0 45 77 56 11 0 42 14 13 115 935 34% Halfway House 10 0 3 0 5 3 5 1 0 0 0 6 37 2 0 1 17 0 2 92 3% Residential Treatment Program 17 1 10 3 4 4 12 1 0 1 4 11 2 1 1 11 13 0 1 97 3% Parole Resid Stabilization Prog 29 3 10 2 13 0 6 3 1 0 0 13 5 5 0 14 7 0 0 111 4% Parole Community Based Resid Prog 1 8 4 0 52 0 11 13 10 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 8 0 22 138 5% Shelter- Housing Only 11 0 17 2 4 3 3 7 0 9 8 49 4 8 1 11 24 6 0 167 6% Shelter that includes ancillary services 2 2 4 0 18 17 0 4 5 3 4 9 3 4 2 1 4 10 37 129 5% Hotel/motel 21 0 17 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 3 6 1 3 1 9 0 68 2% Private Residence 95 17 116 10 36 3 66 59 11 35 137 87 69 52 31 48 80 56 22 1,030 37% Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0%

Em

ploy

men

t Pro

g

Not Referred, No Need Identified 25 10 124 9 74 13 28 50 1 1 14 64 66 25 6 45 28 16 7 606 22% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 1 0 9 0 9 0 10 1 0 3 5 11 2 0 0 1 2 6 1 61 2% Not Referred, Other Reason 30 20 14 6 12 8 51 11 0 2 4 55 60 6 0 23 26 5 46 379 14% Referred, On Waiting List 0 0 5 0 7 0 8 0 8 15 0 48 2 10 1 2 33 13 4 156 6% Referred, Client Declined Services 20 6 9 0 19 50 23 2 1 6 9 2 3 25 2 29 23 19 11 259 9% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 12 0 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 0 1 2 0 2 3 1 39 1% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 19 0 1 1 43 0 5 17 0 0 17 7 5 0 3 2 12 7 17 156 6% Referred, Currently Engaged 18 6 49 0 36 9 49 2 1 7 33 53 33 20 16 22 32 11 107 504 18% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 26 1 3 2 3 186 6 8 19 14 29 12 4 1 5 2 4 7 1 333 12% Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 96 0 16 2 0 36 3 2 0 7 79 3 4 1 1 7 6 7 4 274 10%

Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0%

Ed/

Voc

Pro

g

Not Referred, No Need Identified 176 23 151 11 87 5 50 77 1 22 97 123 132 69 29 83 28 16 68 1,248 45% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 3 0 7 2 4 0 5 0 0 13 0 12 3 3 0 1 2 1 0 56 2% Not Referred, Other Reason 25 12 5 2 14 1 52 4 0 0 2 39 26 3 0 20 33 6 30 274 10% Referred, On Waiting List 0 0 7 1 6 0 14 0 9 2 25 47 1 4 1 6 44 21 13 201 7% Referred, Client Declined Services 18 4 19 0 23 174 19 1 0 13 19 4 6 10 1 16 24 26 28 405 15% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 16 1% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 11 0 0 1 42 0 11 6 0 1 7 3 0 0 0 2 8 6 14 112 4% Referred, Currently Engaged 10 3 36 2 26 20 27 0 1 0 32 17 9 0 1 3 22 13 43 265 10% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 1 1 1 1 3 100 5 5 19 4 6 8 0 0 4 2 2 3 1 166 6% Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 2 0 6 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 23 1%

Unknown 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0% Total 247 43 233 20 206 302 183 95 30 55 200 266 179 89 36 133 168 94 199 2,778

*Program participation status for clients discharged due to a new arrest/violation is their status prior to the arrest/violation.

17

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status at CRTF Discharge* (cont’d)

County Total




Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Soc

Serv

Ass

t

No Need 39 25 63 3 15 55 67 31 1 0 9 23 19 36 7 33 16 30 2 474 17% Referred, Did Not Apply 7 2 2 1 10 4 7 4 0 1 9 35 1 8 2 8 13 4 4 122 4% Applied- Pending 0 5 0 3 25 18 9 10 0 1 4 71 12 0 0 1 21 3 2 185 7% Denied - Not Eligible 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 6 1 4 5 4 3 1 51 2% Denied - DSS Sanction 4 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 18 3 5 2 1 0 0 0 1 38 1% Receiving Services 197 11 168 13 151 225 98 50 29 53 148 111 135 42 22 86 114 54 189 1,896 68% Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0%

Che

m D

ep P

rog

Not Referred, No Need Identified 90 23 51 1 15 0 21 42 0 3 129 48 43 19 1 25 19 14 12 556 20% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 14 1% Not Referred, Other Reason 18 1 3 0 1 0 38 7 0 1 1 15 35 9 0 13 4 1 7 154 6% Referred, On Waiting List 1 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 1 63 0 12 0 1 2 23 0 113 4% Referred, Client Declined Services 1 1 3 0 9 0 4 0 0 1 0 3 0 19 0 13 4 4 3 65 2% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 1 0 36 1 21 0 3 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 8 4 2 2 32 116 4% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 2 0 4 3 32 0 8 15 0 0 2 3 2 0 1 1 9 4 10 96 3%

Referred, Currently Engaged 104 11 98 10 101 0 100 9 11 6 52 61 33 25 17 67 109 35 117 966 35% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 21 6 4 2 16 262 6 16 19 27 13 54 21 2 8 9 14 4 6 510 18%

Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 9 1 30 1 6 40 0 4 0 14 0 4 43 2 1 0 4 6 12 177 6%

Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0%

Sex

Off

Tx

Not Referred, No Need Identified 214 43 214 20 177 301 162 91 29 48 159 247 168 66 34 113 163 92 198 2,539 91% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 6 0 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 30 1% Not Referred, Other Reason 5 0 0 0 2 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 3 0 1 0 43 2% Referred, On Waiting List 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 6 0 10 1 0 0 27 1% Referred, Client Declined Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 13 0%



Unknown 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0% Total 247 43 233 20 206 302 183 95 30 55 200 266 179 89 36 133 168 94 199 2,778


18


County Total




Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Off

Acc

t Pro

g

Not Referred, No Need Identified 205 43 139 20 141 301 143 80 0 3 182 139 154 74 27 92 87 54 169 2,053 74% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 3 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 0 14 24 2 1 58 2% Not Referred, Other Reason 19 0 0 0 1 0 25 1 0 3 1 31 14 11 0 20 0 1 2 129 5% Referred, On Waiting List 2 0 4 0 1 0 3 3 0 3 4 18 0 0 1 1 1 18 1 60 2% Referred, Client Declined Services 5 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 32 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 5 0 54 2% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 10 0 0 0 12 0 2 7 2 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 6 1 10 58 2% Referred, Currently Engaged 3 0 25 0 31 0 6 1 9 0 9 25 5 0 6 3 35 7 16 181 7% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 0 0 5 0 6 1 0 2 19 12 2 25 2 0 2 1 14 3 0 94 3% Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 0 0 55 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 1 8 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 80 3% Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0%

Cog

Beh

Int

Not Referred, No Need Identified 55 30 27 0 190 0 58 79 0 5 123 100 49 47 3 64 72 13 0 915 33% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 13 0 0 1 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 86 2 1 0 23 40 1 3 178 6% Not Referred, Other Reason 27 8 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 1 4 45 39 22 0 25 2 2 12 203 7% Referred, On Waiting List 16 0 4 0 0 0 17 1 0 1 66 19 0 2 0 1 2 6 15 150 5% Referred, Client Declined Services 39 1 3 1 4 0 25 0 0 36 0 0 0 12 0 2 2 25 11 161 6% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 9 0% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 33 0 0 5 4 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 8 2 12 76 3% Referred, Currently Engaged 28 3 48 3 5 0 23 1 11 1 6 4 32 4 18 17 30 27 131 392 14% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 11 1 6 9 0 262 17 8 19 11 0 0 18 0 9 0 9 6 5 391 14% Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 23 0 144 0 0 40 14 6 0 0 0 0 38 0 1 1 3 12 10 292 11% Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0%

Men

tori

ng

Not Referred, No Need Identified 143 40 143 20 166 280 149 95 0 5 149 149 159 6 34 47 152 16 0 1,753 63% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 2 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 50 72 4 0 0 6 13 0 196 355 13% Not Referred, Other Reason 25 3 4 0 4 0 33 0 0 1 0 15 13 8 0 45 0 4 3 158 6% Referred, On Waiting List 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 18 0 0 0 3 0 13 0 44 2% Referred, Client Declined Services 24 0 8 0 13 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 46 0 24 1 37 0 188 7% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 9 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 21 1% Referred, Currently Engaged 40 0 19 0 7 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 2 24 1 4 1 19 0 130 5% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 1 0 1 0 0 17 0 0 18 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 53 2% Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 1 0 48 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 63 2% Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0%

Total 247 43 233 20 206 302 183 95 30 55 200 266 179 89 36 133 168 94 199 2,778


19


County Total




Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Ang

er M

gt

Not Referred, No Need Identified 191 35 120 9 120 241 61 56 11 49 189 168 46 75 23 104 111 57 54 1,720 62% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 13 0 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 37 5 9 0 3 2 0 0 77 3%

Not Referred, Other Reason 18 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 1 14 40 2 0 11 11 1 5 111 4% Referred, On Waiting List 0 0 5 1 1 0 8 1 0 0 6 25 0 0 0 1 5 23 11 87 3% Referred, Client Declined Services 8 1 1 0 7 0 22 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 7 3 58 2% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0%

Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 4 0 0 0 12 0 9 5 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 5 13 2 8 62 2%



Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0%

Men

tal H

ealth

Pro

g






Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0% Total 247 43 233 20 206 302 183 95 30 55 200 266 179 89 36 133 168 94 199 2,778


20


County Total




Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Fam

Sup

p Pr

og






Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0%

Vet

eran

s Pro

g






Unknown 61 0 53 13 62 56 60 21 16 4 43 48 42 25 15 49 42 10 34 654 24% Total 247 43 233 20 206 302 183 95 30 55 200 266 179 89 36 133 168 94 199 2,778


21

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status at CRTF Discharge: All CRTFs

Employment

Program

Education/ Vocational Program

Chemical Dependency

Program

Sex Offender Tx Program

Offender Accountability

Program

Cog Behavioral Intervention

Mentoring Program

Anger Management

Mental Health Tx Program

Family Support Program

Veterans Program

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Total Discharges 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100% 2,778 100%

Clients with No Need (incl. unk) 617 22% 1,260 45% 567 20% 2,551 92% 2,064 74% 926 33% 1,765 64% 1,732 62% 2,132 77% 2,017 73% 2,703 97% Clients with Need 2,161 78% 1,518 55% 2,211 80% 227 8% 714 26% 1,852 67% 1,013 36% 1,046 38% 646 23% 761 27% 75 3%

Not Referred, No Appropriate Prog 61 3% 56 4% 14 1% 30 13% 58 8% 178 10% 355 35% 77 7% 17 3% 137 18% 7 9% Not Referred, Other Reasons 379 18% 274 18% 154 7% 43 19% 129 18% 203 11% 158 16% 111 11% 105 16% 152 20% 35 47%

Referred, On Waiting List 156 7% 201 13% 113 5% 27 12% 60 8% 150 8% 44 4% 87 8% 49 8% 10 1% 1 1% Referred, Client Declined Services 259 12% 405 27% 65 3% 5 2% 54 8% 161 9% 188 19% 58 6% 57 9% 114 15% 3 4%

Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 39 2% 16 1% 116 5% 1 0% 0 0% 9 0% 1 0% 4 0% 6 1% 5 1% 3 4% Referred, Other Non-Adm Reason 156 7% 112 7% 96 4% 13 6% 58 8% 76 4% 21 2% 62 6% 33 5% 33 4% 0 0%

Referred, Currently Engaged 504 23% 265 17% 966 44% 89 39% 181 25% 392 21% 130 13% 289 28% 311 48% 201 26% 22 29% Referred, Did Not Complete 333 15% 166 11% 510 23% 19 8% 94 13% 391 21% 53 5% 154 15% 62 10% 76 10% 3 4%

Referred, Successful Completion 274 13% 23 2% 177 8% 0 0% 80 11% 292 16% 63 6% 204 20% 6 1% 33 4% 1 1%

Clients With Need Subtotal 2,161 100% 1,518 100% 2,211 100% 227 100% 714 100% 1,852 100% 1,013 100% 1,046 100% 646 100% 761 100% 75 100%

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status Categories Summary

Employment Program

Education/ Vocational Program

Chemical Dependency

Program

Sex Offender Tx Program

Offender Accountability

Program

Cog Behavioral Intervention

Mentoring Program

Anger Management

Mental Health Tx Program

Family Support Program

Veterans Program

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Total Clients with Need 2,161 100% 1,518 100% 2,211 100% 227 100% 714 100% 1,852 100% 1,013 100% 1,046 100% 646 100% 761 100% 75 100%

No Appropriate Program 61 3% 56 4% 14 1% 30 13% 58 8% 178 10% 355 35% 77 7% 17 3% 137 18% 7 9% Client on Waiting List 156 7% 201 13% 113 5% 27 12% 60 8% 150 8% 44 4% 87 8% 49 8% 10 1% 1 1% Client Declined Services 259 12% 405 27% 65 3% 5 2% 54 8% 161 9% 188 19% 58 6% 57 9% 114 15% 3 4% Other* 574 27% 402 26% 366 17% 57 25% 187 26% 288 16% 180 18% 177 17% 144 22% 190 25% 38 51% Client Was Enrolled 1,111 51% 454 30% 1,653 75% 108 48% 355 50% 1,075 58% 246 24% 647 62% 379 59% 310 41% 26 35%

Successfully Completed 274 25% 23 5% 177 11% 0 0% 80 23% 292 27% 63 26% 204 32% 6 2% 33 11% 1 4% Currently Engaged 504 45% 265 58% 966 58% 89 82% 181 51% 392 36% 130 53% 289 45% 311 82% 201 65% 22 85% Did Not Complete 333 30% 166 37% 510 31% 19 18% 94 26% 391 36% 53 22% 154 24% 62 16% 76 25% 3 12%

Client Was Enrolled Subtotal 1,111 100% 454 100% 1,653 100% 108 100% 355 100% 1,075 100% 246 100% 647 100% 379 100% 310 100% 26 100%

*Other includes Not Referred, Other Reason, Client Deemed Ineligible, and Other Non-Admission Reason. Client Was Enrolled includes Currently Engaged, Failed to Complete, and Successful Completion.

22

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Employment Status

County Unemployable Not Employed Employed P/T Employed F/T Unknown Total

n % n % n % n % n % n

Albany 26 11% 67 27% 92 37% 62 25% 0 0% 247

Bronx 1 2% 30 70% 8 19% 4 9% 0 0% 43

Broome 4 2% 101 43% 82 35% 46 20% 0 0% 233

Dutchess 4 20% 14 70% 0 0% 2 10% 0 0% 20

Erie 21 10% 140 68% 19 9% 26 13% 0 0% 206

Kings 4 1% 217 72% 19 6% 62 21% 0 0% 302

Manhattan 4 2% 129 70% 25 14% 25 14% 0 0% 183

Monroe 7 7% 74 78% 6 6% 8 8% 0 0% 95

Nassau 1 3% 17 57% 10 33% 2 7% 0 0% 30

Niagara 1 2% 34 62% 11 20% 9 16% 0 0% 55

Oneida 32 16% 144 72% 17 9% 7 4% 0 0% 200

Onondaga 9 3% 226 85% 7 3% 13 5% 11 4% 266

Orange 1 1% 127 71% 27 15% 24 13% 0 0% 179

Rensselaer 12 13% 57 64% 6 7% 14 16% 0 0% 89

Rockland 0 0% 27 75% 3 8% 6 17% 0 0% 36

Schenectady 18 14% 71 53% 18 14% 26 20% 0 0% 133

Suffolk 18 11% 101 60% 25 15% 24 14% 0 0% 168

Ulster 7 7% 57 61% 18 19% 12 13% 0 0% 94

Westchester 25 13% 121 61% 8 4% 45 23% 0 0% 199

Total 195 7% 1,754 63% 401 14% 417 15% 11 % 2,778

23

July 2012 through June 2013 Track I Discharges: Days in CRTF

County <45 days 45-89 days 90+ days Total

n % n % n % n

Albany 2 1% 22 9% 223 90% 247

Bronx 5 12% 5 12% 33 77% 43

Broome 20 9% 30 13% 183 79% 233

Dutchess 7 35% 5 25% 8 40% 20

Erie 55 27% 55 27% 96 47% 206

Kings 110 36% 58 19% 134 44% 302

Manhattan 15 8% 81 44% 87 48% 183

Monroe 24 25% 24 25% 47 49% 95

Nassau 3 10% 12 40% 15 50% 30

Niagara 14 25% 7 13% 34 62% 55

Oneida 13 7% 17 9% 170 85% 200

Onondaga 33 12% 33 12% 200 75% 266

Orange 21 12% 35 20% 123 69% 179

Rensselaer 24 27% 30 34% 35 39% 89

Rockland 3 8% 9 25% 24 67% 36

Schenectady 8 6% 23 17% 102 77% 133

Suffolk 29 17% 57 34% 82 49% 168

Ulster 8 9% 9 10% 77 82% 94

Westchester 20 10% 17 9% 162 81% 199

Total 414 15% 529 19% 1,835 66% 2,778

june 2013 - new york state division of criminal …...3 crtf track i admissions, july 2012 – june...

Documents