k11_19790410.pdf

3
K.LL Release Date: April 10, lit 19 HOLDOVER FLOAT AS PERCENT OF DOLLAR AMOUNT RECEIVED DEC 1978 J AN J 979 FEB 1979 FEB 22- -FEB 28 MAR 1--MAR 7 MAR 15-'MAR 21 MAR 22-MAR 26 ££1 AM F&L RANK ££I RANK ££1 RANK £C1 RANK ££1 RANK ££1 RANK —£j BOSTON 1.15 41 0 . 9 6 43 1. 33 41 1.20 31 1 . 0 7 34 0 . 8 9 38 1 . 0 3 35 1 . 0 3 33 LEWISTON 0,07 48 0 . 1 3 48 0.10 48 0.08 44 0 . 0 8 45 0 . 0 5 47 0 .03 48 0 . 0 3 46 WINDSOR LOCKS 5, • 8 4 12 2 . 1 9 29 3.46 12 2.15 20 4 . 1 5 8 6 . 4 8 3 0 .63 43 O.27 44 NEW YORK 2.39 31 2 . 6 7 24 4.02 11 3.86 9 0 . 0 0 46 4 .00 10 5 . 7 7 5 2 . 9 6 9 BUFFALO 4 . BO 17 4 . 2 5 9 6A 4 9 6 10. ,30 4 1 . 9 1 26 0 . 6 9 38 1 . 5 9 Z4 0 .85 36 JERICHO 6.24 10 4 . 9 4 6 4.89 9 4.06 8 0 . 0 0 46 1 . 69 27 3 .94 11 100 .00 1 CJ^FORD 5.39 14 5 . 0 3 4 1.58 35 0. 02 45 0 . 0 0 46 0 . 4 6 46 0 . 4 0 47 0 . 3 5 43 " ; CJ^FORD 4 , >93 15 3 . 7 7 16 3. 27 13 1. 09 34 1 . 1 9 33 1 . 4 1 30 1 . 1 9 30 1 . 1 4 29 PHILADELPHIA •48 18 4 . 8 5 7 8.30 5 7. 59 6 4 . 2 7 7 3 . 3 5 14 12 . 6 7 2 1 . 3 1 24 CLEVELAND 0.93 42 1 . 00 41 0.90 46 0. 98 36 0 . 9 3 36 1 . 0 2 36 0 .96 37 0 . 0 0 47 CINCINNATI 10, .26 5 3 . 3 7 18 3. 22 14 3 . 0 1 14 2 . 9 3 16 5 . 6 9 5 2 . 7 8 16 3 . 7 1 8 PITTSBURGH 0.53 46 0 .61 46 0. 33 47 0.38 42 0 . 3 0 43 2 . 0 2 26 0 .75 41 0 .ZO 45 COLUMBUS 2.73 27 1 . 9 6 31 2.97 18 3.10 12 4 . 4 8 6 2 . 3 3 21 1 . 0 3 35 1 . 3 9 22 RICHMOND 1. 93 35 4 . 0 3 13 3, 03 17 2. 07 22 2 . 4 8 19 1 . 0 2 36 1 . 5 0 25 1 . 0 8 31 BALTIMORE 2.21 33 4 .46 8 8. 50 4 9.47 5 4 . 6 0 5 1 . 5 5 29 4 . 2 5 9 1 . 5 1 18 CHARLOTTE 2. 11 34 1 . 1 0 39 1. 37 40 0.49 40 1 . 3 9 30 0 .55 45 2 . 0 1 19 1 . 5 1 is COLUMBIA I . 24 40 3 . 1 4 20 21. 30 1 1. 92 25 1 . 0 1 35 0 . 8 6 40 5 . 2 3 6 0 .43 41 CHARLESTON 0. 91 43 0 . 8 2 44 2. 71 21 0. 77 38 0 .86 38 0 . 8 4 41 0 . 6 3 40 0 . 9 5 34 ATLANTA 11.82 3 4 . 0 6 12 5.95 7 5 . 4 9 7 6 . 6 6 4 5 . 4 7 7 3 .37 14 3. .89 7 BIRMINGHAM 2. 46 30 1 . 6 7 36 4. 92 8 1. 56 27 2 . 2 9 24 2 . 3 7 20 1 . 2 5 29 7 . 2 6 4 JACKSONVILLE 3. 40 22 3 . 8 8 15 1.66 34 1.97 24 1 . 7 2 27 2 7 . 4 3 1 1 . 6 1 23 1 . 1 7 27 NASHVILLE 3. 23 24 1 . 9 4 33 2. 09 28 1 . 4 5 28 7 . 3 6 3 1 . 4 1 30 4 .17 10 1 . 1 4 29 NEW ORLEANS 8. 95 6 7 . 3 9 2 4. 34 10 12. 33 3 11 .44 1 3 .52 12 15 . 7 B 1 0 .00 47 > MIAMI 4. 81 16 3 . 2 3 19 2. 62 23 Cm 98 15 2 . 9 8 15 3 .02 16 3 .30 15 ..... % .26 12 CHICAGO 7 . 10 9 4 . 9 6 5 3. 16 15 3 . 7 0 10 2 . 4 7 20 2 . 3 2 22 2 . 0 7 16 1 . 7 3 16 DETROIT 5. 43 13 2 . 5 5 25 3 . 0 9 16 0. 00 47 3 .82 9 3 .38 3 . 5 7 13 2 . 4 3 10 OES MOINES 2 . 55 29 1 . 6 4 37 1. 78 30 1 . 7 1 26 1 . 4 4 29 2 . 1 7 25 1 . 6 2 22 1 . 4 5 21 INDIANAPOLIS 3 . 88 20 4 . 0 8 11 2. 51 26 0 . 0 0 47 3 .13 14 1 . 6 5 28 1 . 1 9 30 1 . 4 7 20 MiUfAUKEE 3 . 2 9 23 2 . 7 2 23 1. 88 29 2. 14 21 2 . 7 7 18 2 . 1 8 24 1 . 3 5 28 1 . 7 3 16 ST^ B UIS 10. 67 4 4 . 0 2 14 2. 54 25 0 . 0 1 46 3 .66 11 6 . 3 3 4 8 . 1 4 3 1 . 0 4 32 LWTLE ROCK 3 . 6 3 21 1 . 1 0 39 1 . 6 7 33 1 . 3 1 30 1 . 3 6 31 2 . 6 2 19 1 . 1 7 32 0 . 9 2 35 LOUISVILLE 3 . 04 26 1 . 4 5 38 1 . 4 8 38 1. 11 32 0 . 9 2 37 1 . 3 0 33 0 . 9 3 38 1 . 1 5 26 MEMPHIS 16. 25 1 1 0 . 4 0 1 2. 55 24 2. 89 16 3 .74 10 5 . 5 3 6 7 . 4 8 4 b .60 38 MINNEAPOLIS 7 . 75 7 3 . 4 2 17 1. 74 31 2 . 0 7 22 2 . 3 3 22 2 . 2 7 23 1 . 9 6 20 2 . 3 4 11 HELENA 2 . 67 28 1 .96 32 1. 09 43 1. 37 29 2 . 4 5 21 1 .19 35 1 . 7 6 21 11 .04 2 KANSAS CITY 1. 79 36 0 . 9 9 42 1. 55 36 1. 11 32 0 .58 41 0 . 5 8 44 0 . 6 4 42 0 .50 40 DENVER 1. 75 37 2 . 9 9 21 1. 45 39 0. 86 37 3 .16 13 3 .07 15 1 .04 34 1 . 2 7 25 OKLAHOMA C I T Y 0 . 79 44 0 .82 44 0. 98 45 2 . 4 5 19 0 .33 42 5 .12 8 0 .55 45 o .38 42 OMAHA 2 . 23 32 2 . 7 5 22 2. 82 19 3. 29 11 2 . 1 0 25 2 . 6 5 18 2 . 4 7 17 2 . 2 6 12 DALLAS 7 . 35 8 1 .83 35 2 . 8 1 20 2 . 6 4 17 3 .30 12 3 .95 11 1 .49 26 X .67 15 EL PASO 0. 58 45 2 . 0 9 30 1. 54 37 0. 35 43 1 .59 2B 0 . 6 0 43 0 . 4 2 46 0.65 37 HOUSTON 4 . 03 19 2,.46 26 10. 10 3 16. 95 2 0.79 39 1 . 2 1 34 1 .16 33 6 . 0 0 5 J SAN ANTONIO 5. 85 11 5 . 7 9 3 1 2 . 6 8 2 2 0 . 0 8 1 9 .90 2 12 . 5 1 2 5 . 0 4 7 10 .95 3 v SAN FRANCISCO 1. 26 39 1 .90 34 2 . 2 5 27 2 . 6 4 17 2.91 17 4 . 7 9 9 4 . 8 7 6 2 . 2 6 12 LOS ANGELES 3. 11 25 2 , 3 1 27 1. 05 44 1. 08 35 1 .36 31 1 . 3 8 32 1 .43 27 1 23 PORTLAND 1. 72 38 2 . 2 1 28 1 . 6 9 32 0. 72 39 2,.32 23 0 . 0 0 46 0 .62 44 0 39 SALT LAKE CITY 12. 94 2 4 .16 10 1. 10 42 0. 48 41 0 .21 44 2 . 6 7 17 3 .75 12 1 .23 26 SEATTLE 0. 47 47 0.45 47 2 . 6 3 22 3. 07 13 0 .63 40 0 . 6 5 42 0 . 8 8 39 3 .99 6 OVERALL SYSTEM 4 . 15 2.96 3. 50 3. 49 2.14 3 . 6 2 3 .51 2 . 2 0 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Upload: fedfraser

Post on 20-Nov-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • K.LL Release Date: Apr i l 10, lit 19

    HOLDOVER FLOAT AS PERCENT OF DOLLAR AMOUNT RECEIVED

    DEC 1978 J AN J 979 FEB 1979 FEB 22--FEB 28 MAR 1--MAR 7 MAR 15-'MAR 21 MAR 22-MAR 26 1 A M F&L RANK I RANK 1 RANK C 1 RANK 1 RANK 1 RANK j

    BOSTON 1 . 1 5 4 1 0 . 9 6 43 1. 33 4 1 1 . 2 0 31 1 . 0 7 34 0 . 8 9 38 1 . 0 3 35 1 . 0 3 33 LEWISTON 0 , 0 7 48 0 . 1 3 48 0 . 1 0 48 0 . 0 8 44 0 . 0 8 45 0 . 0 5 47 0 . 0 3 48 0 . 0 3 4 6 WINDSOR LOCKS 5, 84 12 2 . 1 9 29 3 . 4 6 12 2 . 1 5 20 4 . 1 5 8 6 . 4 8 3 0 . 6 3 43 O . 2 7 44

    NEW YORK 2 . 3 9 3 1 2 . 6 7 24 4 . 0 2 11 3 . 8 6 9 0 . 0 0 46 4 . 0 0 10 5 . 7 7 5 2 . 9 6 9 BUFFALO 4 . BO 17 4 . 2 5 9 6A 49 6 10. ,30 4 1 . 9 1 26 0 . 6 9 38 1 . 5 9 Z4 0 . 8 5 36 JERICHO 6 . 2 4 10 4 . 9 4 6 4 . 8 9 9 4 . 0 6 8 0 . 0 0 46 1 . 6 9 27 3 . 9 4 11 100 . 0 0 1 CJ^FORD 5 . 3 9 14 5 . 0 3 4 1 . 5 8 35 0 . 02 45 0 . 0 0 46 0 . 4 6 46 0 . 4 0 47 0 . 3 5 43

    " ; CJ^FORD

    4 , >93 15 3 . 7 7 16 3 . 27 13 1 . 09 34 1 . 1 9 33 1 . 4 1 30 1 . 1 9 30 1 . 1 4 2 9 PHILADELPHIA 4 48 18 4 . 8 5 7 8 . 3 0 5 7 . 59 6 4 . 2 7 7 3 . 3 5 14 12 . 67 2 1 . 3 1 24 CLEVELAND 0 . 9 3 42 1 . 0 0 4 1 0 . 9 0 4 6 0 . 98 36 0 . 9 3 36 1 . 0 2 36 0 . 9 6 37 0 . 0 0 4 7

    CINCINNATI 10, .26 5 3 . 3 7 18 3 . 22 14 3 . 0 1 14 2 . 9 3 16 5 . 6 9 5 2 . 78 16 3 . 7 1 8 PITTSBURGH 0 . 5 3 46 0 . 6 1 46 0 . 33 47 0 . 3 8 42 0 . 3 0 43 2 . 0 2 26 0 . 7 5 41 0 .ZO 45 COLUMBUS 2 . 7 3 27 1 . 9 6 3 1 2 . 9 7 18 3 . 1 0 12 4 .48 6 2 . 3 3 2 1 1 . 03 35 1 . 3 9 22

    RICHMOND 1 . 93 35 4 . 0 3 13 3 , 03 17 2 . 07 22 2 . 4 8 19 1 . 0 2 36 1 . 5 0 25 1 . 08 3 1 BALTIMORE 2 . 2 1 33 4 . 4 6 8 8 . 50 4 9 . 4 7 5 4 . 6 0 5 1 . 5 5 29 4 . 2 5 9 1 . 5 1 18 CHARLOTTE 2 . 11 34 1 . 1 0 39 1 . 37 40 0 . 4 9 40 1 . 3 9 30 0 . 5 5 45 2 . 0 1 19 1 . 5 1 i s COLUMBIA I . 24 40 3 . 1 4 20 2 1 . 30 1 1 . 92 25 1 . 0 1 35 0 . 8 6 40 5 . 2 3 6 0 . 4 3 4 1 CHARLESTON 0 . 91 43 0 . 8 2 44 2 . 71 21 0 . 77 38 0 . 86 38 0 . 8 4 4 1 0 . 6 3 40 0 . 9 5 34

    ATLANTA 11 .82 3 4 . 0 6 12 5 . 9 5 7 5 . 49 7 6 . 6 6 4 5 . 4 7 7 3 . 3 7 14 3. . 8 9 7 BIRMINGHAM 2 . 46 30 1 . 6 7 36 4 . 92 8 1 . 56 27 2 . 2 9 24 2 . 3 7 20 1 . 2 5 29 7 . 2 6 4 JACKSONVILLE 3 . 40 22 3 . 8 8 15 1 . 6 6 34 1 . 9 7 24 1 .72 27 27 . 4 3 1 1 . 6 1 23 1 . 1 7 27 NASHVILLE 3 . 23 24 1 . 9 4 33 2 . 09 28 1 . 45 28 7 . 3 6 3 1 . 4 1 30 4 .17 10 1 . 1 4 29 NEW ORLEANS 8 . 95 6 7 . 3 9 2 4 . 34 10 12 . 33 3 11 . 4 4 1 3 . 5 2 12 15 . 7 B 1 0 . 0 0 47 > MIAMI 4 . 81 16 3 . 2 3 19 2 . 62 23 Cm 98 15 2 . 9 8 15 3 . 0 2 16 3 . 3 0 15 ..... % . 2 6 12

    CHICAGO 7 . 10 9 4 . 9 6 5 3 . 16 15 3 . 70 10 2 . 4 7 20 2 . 3 2 22 2 .07 16 1 . 73 16 DETROIT 5 . 43 13 2 . 5 5 25 3 . 0 9 16 0 . 00 47 3 . 82 9 3 . 3 8 3 . 5 7 13 2 . 4 3 10 OES MOINES 2 . 55 29 1 . 6 4 37 1 . 78 3 0 1 . 7 1 26 1 . 4 4 29 2 . 1 7 25 1 . 6 2 22 1 . 4 5 2 1 INDIANAPOLIS 3 . 88 20 4 . 0 8 11 2 . 51 26 0 . 00 47 3 . 1 3 14 1 . 6 5 28 1 . 1 9 30 1 . 4 7 20 MiUfAUKEE 3 . 29 23 2 . 7 2 23 1 . 88 29 2 . 14 21 2 . 7 7 18 2 . 1 8 24 1 . 3 5 28 1 . 7 3 16

    S T ^ B U I S 10 . 67 4 4 . 0 2 14 2 . 54 25 0 . 01 46 3 . 6 6 11 6 . 3 3 4 8 . 1 4 3 1 . 0 4 32 LWTLE ROCK 3 . 63 21 1 . 1 0 39 1 . 67 33 1 . 3 1 30 1 . 3 6 3 1 2 . 6 2 19 1 . 1 7 32 0 . 92 35 LOUISVILLE 3 . 04 26 1 . 4 5 38 1 . 48 38 1 . 1 1 32 0 .92 37 1 . 3 0 33 0 . 9 3 38 1 . 1 5 26 MEMPHIS 16 . 25 1 10 . 4 0 1 2 . 55 24 2 . 89 16 3 . 7 4 10 5 . 5 3 6 7 . 4 8 4 b . 6 0 38

    MINNEAPOLIS 7 . 75 7 3 . 4 2 17 1. 74 3 1 2 . 07 22 2 .33 22 2 . 2 7 23 1 . 9 6 20 2 . 3 4 11 HELENA 2 . 67 28 1 . 9 6 32 1 . 09 43 1 . 37 29 2 .45 2 1 1 . 1 9 35 1 . 7 6 21 11 . 0 4 2

    KANSAS CITY 1 . 79 36 0 . 9 9 42 1 . 55 36 1 . 11 32 0 .58 4 1 0 . 5 8 44 0 . 6 4 42 0 . 5 0 40 DENVER 1 . 75 37 2 . 9 9 21 1 . 45 39 0 . 86 37 3 . 16 13 3 . 0 7 15 1 . 0 4 34 1 . 2 7 25 OKLAHOMA CITY 0 . 79 44 0 . 8 2 44 0 . 98 45 2 . 45 19 0 .33 42 5 . 12 8 0 . 5 5 45 o . 3 8 42 OMAHA 2 . 23 32 2 . 7 5 22 2 . 82 19 3 . 29 11 2 .10 25 2 . 6 5 18 2 . 4 7 17 2 . 2 6 12

    DALLAS 7 . 35 8 1 . 8 3 35 2 . 8 1 20 2 . 64 17 3 . 30 12 3 . 95 11 1 . 4 9 26 X . 6 7 15 EL PASO 0 . 58 45 2 . 0 9 30 1 . 54 37 0 . 35 43 1 . 59 2B 0 . 6 0 43 0 . 4 2 46 0 . 6 5 37 HOUSTON 4 . 03 19 2, . 4 6 26 1 0 . 10 3 1 6 . 95 2 0 . 7 9 39 1 . 2 1 34 1 . 1 6 33 6 . 0 0 5 J SAN ANTONIO 5 . 85 11 5 . 7 9 3 1 2 . 68 2 2 0 . 08 1 9 .90 2 12 . 5 1 2 5 . 0 4 7 10 . 9 5 3 v

    SAN FRANCISCO 1 . 26 39 1 . 9 0 34 2 . 25 27 2 . 6 4 17 2 . 9 1 17 4 . 7 9 9 4 . 8 7 6 2 . 2 6 12 LOS ANGELES 3 . 11 25 2 , 3 1 27 1 . 05 44 1 . 08 35 1 .36 31 1 . 3 8 32 1 . 4 3 27 1 23 PORTLAND 1 . 72 38 2 . 2 1 28 1 . 69 32 0 . 72 39 2, .32 23 0 . 0 0 46 0 . 6 2 44 0 39 SALT LAKE CITY 1 2 . 94 2 4 . 1 6 10 1 . 10 42 0 . 48 4 1 0 . 2 1 44 2 . 6 7 17 3 . 7 5 12 1 . 2 3 26 SEATTLE 0 . 47 47 0 . 4 5 47 2 . 63 22 3 . 07 13 0 .63 40 0 . 6 5 42 0 . 8 8 39 3 . 9 9 6

    OVERALL SYSTEM 4 . 15 2 . 9 6 3 . 50 3 . 49 2 . 1 4 3 . 6 2 3 . 5 1 2 . 2 0

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • BOSTON LEW1STON WINDSOR LOCKS

    NEW YORK BUFFALO JERICHO CRANFORD J M C A

    PFR^BOELPHI A CLEVELAND

    CINCINNATI PITTSBURGH COLUMBUS

    RICHMOND BALTIMORE CHARLOTTE COLUMBIA CHARLESTON

    ATLANTA BIRMINGHAM JACKSONVILLE NASHVILLE NEW ORLEANS MIAMI

    CHICAGO DETROIT OES MOINES INDIANAPOLIS MILWAUKEE

    STEJ-OUIS A F T L E ROCK U L S V I L L E MEMPHIS

    MINNEAPOLIS HELENA

    KANSAS CITY DENVER OKLAHOMA C11Y OMAHA

    DALLAS EL PASO HOUSTON SAN ANTONIO

    SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES PORTLAND SALT LAKE CITY SEATTLE

    OVERALL SYSTEM

    PEC 1978 JAM 1979 ELI RANK JELL RANK 1 . 7 1 39 1 . 1 5 43 0 . 0 7 48 0 . 0 7 48 7 . 9 8 11 4 . 1 1 14

    15 .02 3 12 . 4 3 2 3 . 5 5 23 2 . 7 7 24 5 . 7 4 16 5 . 7 2 8 5 . 3 0 20 9 4 . 4 7 1 5 . 5 1 18 4 . 7 4 12 2 . 0 4 36 2 . 7 5 25 0 . 3 5 46 0 . 2 7 46

    13 .62 6 4 . 7 7 11 0 . 8 8 43 0 . 8 9 44 2 . 3 4 34 1 . 7 3 35 3 . 4 6 24 5 . 9 4 7 2 . 4 1 33 6 . 2 9 6 3 . 2 7 26 2 . 5 1 29 0 . 6 9 44 3 . 8 1 17 1 . 4 1 4 1 1 . 2 9 41

    1 4 . 6 6 5 3 . 8 5 16 2 . 8 2 28 1 . 6 0 36 2 . 6 4 31 3 . 6 0 18 2 . 7 2 29 1 . 9 0 33 8 . 1 2 10 1 . 8 6 34 3 . 3 0 25 2 . 6 1 26

    15 .25 2 9 . 5 6 3 5 . 7 7 15 4 . 6 8 13 6 . 9 9 13 3 . 4 9 20 4 . 5 7 21 4 . 9 3 10

    12 .09 7 9 . 4 9 4 8 . 7 8 9 2 . 5 2 28 5 . 4 2 19 1 . 2 3 42 3 . 9 5 22 2 . 0 5 31

    19 .11 1 3 . 9 8 15 7 . 2 2 12 2 . 5 7 27 3 . 0 3 27 2 . 4 5 30 2 . 6 8 30 1 . 3 5 40 2 . 1 5 35 3 . 1 5 22 1 . 1 9 42 1 . 3 7 39 1 . 8 4 38 1 . 5 5 37

    1 1 . 0 6 8 2 . 0 5 31 0 . 2 7 47 0 . 1 7 47 1 . 8 9 37 3 . 0 0 23 5 . 9 2 14 3 . 2 5 21 0 . 4 0 45 0 . 6 4 45 5 . 5 2 17 5 . 2 7 9 2 . 4 3 32 3 . 5 4 19

    14 .92 4 7 . 2 7 5 1 . 4 5 40 1 . 4 6 38

    6 . 4 0 3 4 . 0 9

    FEB 1979 ELI RANK 1 2 . 0 1 32 1*07 0 . 0 7 47 0 . 0 6 4 . 9 6 14 1 . 1 9

    1 6 . 8 3 2 17 .94 4 . 2 5 19 7 . 1 3 5 . 2 1 12 4 . 1 1 1 . 1 4 42 0 . 0 0 5 . 1 7 13 1 . 2 1 2 . 2 5 26 1 . 7 6 0 . 2 9 46 0 . 2 4 4 . 4 1 18 3 . 8 3 0 . 8 2 45 0 . 8 5 1 . 8 6 37 1 . 9 4 4 . 7 8 15 1 . 3 0

    1 1 . 2 0 4 1 2 . 4 0 2 . 1 2 28 0 . 3 9

    2 1 . 4 5 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 8 22 1 . 4 5 6 . 9 2 5 4 . 3 3 5 . 5 7 10 1 . 6 1 1 . 1 3 43 1 . 1 8 2 . 0 3 31 1 . 6 9 3 . 7 5 20 1 0 . 7 4 2 . 2 6 25 2 . 9 6 5 . 9 2 7 8 . 0 7 5 . 8 7 8 0 . 0 0 5 . 5 6 11 6 . 9 4 1 . 9 7 33 0 . 0 0 5 . 5 9 9 7 . 8 9 6 . 0 9 6 1 0 . 4 5 1 . 9 1 35 1 . 8 3 1 . 8 8 36 1 . 5 1 2 . 0 4 30 2 . 1 5 2 . 0 6 29 1 . 9 2 2 . 4 2 24 2 . 2 7 1 . 8 3 38 1 . 0 9 1 . 9 6 34 1 .37 1 . 5 6 39 3 . 5 8 1 . 4 6 4 1 1 . 3 6 3 . 5 3 21 4 . 0 5 0 . 0 7 47 0 . 1 6 4 . 7 4 16 6 . 9 9

    1 5 . 4 5 3 2 6 . 8 8 0 . 9 6 44 1 . 3 1 2 . 1 4 27 2 . 8 6 2 . 4 5 23 1 . 1 6 1 . 5 3 4 0 0 . 7 7 4 . 4 8 17 6 . 7 8

    4 . 6 7 4 . 7 8

    MAR 1--MAR 7 MAR 15-MAR 41 MAR 22-MAR 2f B A M J RAM* EJ &Am I RANK fcl B A M

    39 0 . 8 8 39 0 . 9 6 37 1 . 0 7 39 0 . 9 8 3 5 45 0 . 0 5 47 0 . 0 2 47 , 0 . 0 2 48 0 . 0 3 4 6 35 5 . 6 4 9 8 . 1 7 5 1 . 9 3 22 1 . 1 9 3 4

    2 1 8 . 2 1 1 1 7 . 1 0 2 2 0 . 4 8 1 1 3 . 6 5 2 8 1 . 8 3 28 0 . 9 2 38 1 . 5 2 27 0 . 7 5 40

    13 0 . 0 0 48 2 . 0 4 25 3 . 1 8 17 3 . 2 5 14 4 6 2 . 0 3 25 0 . 4 4 43 0 . 4 0 45 0 . 3 7 45 34 1 . 1 6 37 1 . 2 1 36 1 . 0 9 38 1 . 2 1 32 25 1 . 7 4 30 1 . 8 2 28 1 5 . 0 1 3 5 . 3 6 5 4 3 0 . 3 4 45 0 . 3 7 45 0 . 3 6 46 0 . 0 0 47 15 3 . 8 4 14 6 . 7 3 8 3 . 5 0 12 4 . 9 3 7 40 0 . 6 6 41 2 . 5 8 20 1 . 7 5 23 0 . 7 9 39 22 4 . 3 6 12 1 . 8 6

  • DATA ERROR EXCEPTION REPORT

    DATA FOR THE OFFICES LISTED ON THIS PAGE FOR THE STATEMENT WEEK BEGINNING 7 9 / 0 3 / 2 2 ARE EITHER MISSING OR INCORRECT. THE STATISTICS AND RANKINGS ON THE ACCOMPANYING REPORTS ARE AFFECTED ACCORDINGLY.

    OFFICE CODE AND NAME 022 JERICHO

    040 CLEVELAND

    064 NEW ORLEANS

    NOTES A CHECK HAS BEEN MADE ONLY ON KEY DATA FIELDS WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE ACCOMPANYING RANKINGS FOR THE LATEST REPORTED WEEK SHOWN. FLOAT ANALYSTS SHOULD REVIEW PREVIOUS EDIT REPORTS FOR WARNING MESSAGES AND ACCURACY OF REPORTED FIGURES. I

    j #

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis