kamil tuček on behalf of task 2.1 contributors

12
Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors Joint Research Centre (JRC) Institute for Energy and Transport (IET) Nuclear Reactor Safety Assessment Unit (NRSA) http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu LEADER WP2 Meeting Karlsruhe, 21 November 2012

Upload: kineta

Post on 24-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant. Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors. Joint Research Centre (JRC) Institute for Energy and Transport (IET) Nuclear Reactor Safety Assessment Unit ( NRSA ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

Task 2.1: Review of ELSY and Conceptual design & neutronic

characterization of the ELFR Industrial Plant

Kamil Tuček

on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

Joint Research Centre (JRC)Institute for Energy and Transport (IET)

Nuclear Reactor Safety Assessment Unit (NRSA)http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu

LEADER WP2 MeetingKarlsruhe, 21 November 2012

Page 2: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

2

• Define an updated core configuration for the European LFR Industrial Plant, starting from a critical review of the previous ELSY core and aiming at the demonstration of the so called “adiabatic” concept, which envisages multi-recycling of the entire actinide vector until an equilibrium is achieved with a top-up material being natural or depleted uranium and removed materials being FPs and actinides not recovered or lost in reprocessing & fuel fabrication

• The second objective is to design and characterise ELFR start-up cores and devise possible strategies for the transition from start-up to equilibrium (adiabatic) cores

• Investigate MA burning capability of ELFR cores for MA concentrations beyond those corresponding to self-produced nuclei

The detailed objectives of Task 2.1 are to

21 April 2023

Page 3: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

321 April 2023

ANSALDO 1 PMAGH 6 PMENEA 8 PMKIT 6 PMINR 5 PMJRC 5 PM

We’re six partners

D05: Definition of the adiabatic equilibrium ELFR core and its neutronics characterization (technically completed)

T55: Design and neutronic characterisation of start-up core, its MA burning capability, and on scenarios of its possible transition to the adiabatic equilibrium (activities are on-going)

D28: Summary, conclusions and recommendations on the ELFR core configurations (with deadline on 31 March 2013)

With two deliverables and one technical report

Page 4: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

• It’s scope-wise completed and includes contributions from AGH, ENEA, KIT, and JRC

• Internal review at JRC had been performed and draft revision A was distributed by Christoph Döderlein to other partners for review and comments on September 21st

• Updates and comments were received from KIT and ENEA

• Rev. A is envisaged to be published in December 2012, possibly also including comments from AGH

Status of Deliverable D05 is as follows

21 April 2023 4

Page 5: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

A. Travleev

21 April 2023 5

Specifically at KIT, two model improvements were implemented

• Explicit heterogeneous modelling of wrapper structures and coolant in the SA inlet and outlet regions assuming thus more realistic amount of steel in these parts of the model, which is about 10%. This is to be compared to 50% assumed in the old, original homogeneous model.

Page 6: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

6April 21, 2023

Consequently, impact of these model changes on the system criticality and reactivity feedbacks, specifically coolant density reactivity feedback was investigated

A. Travleev

The second improvement implemented concerns

• Improved design of radial shield assemblies, which are now modelled more realistically (like sub-assemblies) instead being modelled in an ad-hoc, customised manner

Page 7: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

Change in the modelkeff (value / change) at

BoL BoC EoC

Original model 0.99460 / 0 1.00212 / 0 1.00469 / 0

Lower nozzles 0.99447 / -13 1.00220 / 8 1.00427 / -42

Lower and upper nozzles 0.99994 / 534 1.00756 / 544 1.00981 / 512

Nozzles and shield assemblies 1.00066 / 606 1.00846 / 634 1.01053 / 584

  with estimated standard dev. of about 4 pcmThere is about 500 pcm contribution to the increase of keff due to the change in SA outlet modelling, the reason being mainly lower neutron capture

While contribution of ca. 80 pcm to the increase of keff was observed from the change of modelling of the radial shield assemblies

On the other hand, keff changes only negligibly due to the change of the model at the SA inlet

Due to lower absorption in the reflector (SA inlet and outlet regions) keff increases

7

In terms of the impact on the criticality (keff)

Page 8: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

RegionRC (value / change) at

BoL BoC EoC

In-core -418 ± 5 / -410±4 -425 ± 5 / -396 ± 4 -411 ± 5 / -401 ± 4

Inlet 17 ± 1 / 19 ± 2 18 ± 1 / 11 ± 2 14 ± 1 / 15 ± 2

Outlet 22 ± 1 / 38 ± 5 27 ± 1 / 54 ± 5 25 ± 1 / 33 ± 4

It was observed that the updated model yields slightly smaller coolant density reactivity coefficient, including the corresponding value for the in-core region, than the original model

Generally speaking, however, the impact of the new implemented model on the predictions of core criticality and reactivity coefficients seems to be rather small

8

As for the impact on the coolant density reactivity coefficient / RC (k/)

Page 9: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

• Design and characterise start-up ELFR core with MOX fuel

• Analyse impact and investigate potential for MA burning, incl. initial MA loadings beyond those corresponding to self-produced MAs

• Devise preliminary strategies for the transition from start-up to adiabatic equilibrium core

Regarding the Technical Report T55, the activities to be reported there have objectives to:

21 April 2023 9

Contribution is expected also from AGH

Original expected delivery was on 30 April 2012 Now?

Contribution is expected also from AGH

Original expected delivery was on 30 April 2012 Now?

Page 10: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

1021 April 2023

• Should provide, on the basis of results of Deliverable D05 and Technical Report T55, summary, conclusions and recommendations on further improvements of the ELFR core configuration

• Has delivery date on 31March 2013

• Contributions are expected from JRC (main author) and ENEA with a possible review role of ANSALDO

• One of the aspects to be highlighted for the improvement is the low average discharge burn-up (~50 GWd/tHM) achieved in the present ELFR core concepts (which is, among others, due to the absence of fuel reshuffling)

Deliverable 28:

Page 11: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

Conclusions

Rev. A of Deliverable D05 is to be issued in December 2012, to possibly also include review and comments from AGH

Contributions to Technical Report T55 are expected mainly from AGH, status of activities is to be clarified

Deliverable D28 shall be issued by 31 March 2013, with contributions expected from JRC and ENEA and with possible ANSALDO contribution to review and comment on the report, at the same time ensuring coherence with the conclusions and recommendations reached in other WPs

1121 April 2023

Page 12: Kamil Tuček on behalf of Task 2.1 contributors

12

Thank you for your attention!