kcic fall2011 grantee survey

Upload: nowcastsa

Post on 07-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    1/16

    KCIC Fall 2011 Grantee Survey - Round 3

    Introduction

    Thank you for completing this annual survey for John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

    Community Information Challenge awardees. Your responses are an important way to

    communicate how your project is developing and your overall experience in the KnightCommunity Information Challenge (KCIC).

    We appreciate your thoughtful responses to the questions that follow. The survey must be

    completed by 5pm EST on Wednesday, July 27, 2011. Your responses fulfill the reporting

    requirement to Knight Foundation. Circuit Riders will be in touch with you separately about

    providing web traffic data.

    This survey includes questions intended for both implementing organizations and foundation

    leadership. Please plan for up to 2 hours to complete the survey; however, additional time may

    be needed to prepare your responses (see more on the next page on Tips).

    How to Submit Your Responses:

    You will be able to return to this survey as many times as you need to by following the unique

    URL link that was sent to you by email. Please note that your responses will only be saved

    when you progress from one page to the next by clicking the >>; (forward) button. When you

    have completed the survey, and are ready to submit it, click on the >> (forward) button on the

    last page. You should submit only one survey per project.

    >>

    Tips on Preparing Your Responses

    How to Prepare Your Responses:

    This survey has 28 questions that are distributed over three sections 1) Project

    implementation and outcomes (14 questions), 2) Foundation engagement (8 questions), and3) Knight Foundation resources and feedback (6 questions). We encourage you to consult with

    other members of your project team (e.g., program staff, implementing partners, your board

    and/or senior leadership, contractors) to complete this survey.

    Here are a few suggested approaches:

    Send the survey Word document to stakeholders and schedule a conversation to complete

    it together in person or over the phone (Word version sent in FSG email June 24)

    Send relevant sections to the most appropriate stakeholders to fill out responses in a

    Word document (e.g., send section one to implementing partners) and have a single

    representative enter the responses online using the link

    Complete the survey online, section by section, forwarding the link to others, as needed.

    Additionally, you may find it useful to have relevant project documents on-hand, such as your

    project budget or evaluation plan when filling out or discussing the questions. Please keep in

    mind that the goal of the survey is to obtain responses that accurately reflect your knowledge

    and experiences. The usefulness of the findings is dependent on the quality of information

    provided by respondents. Please consider where your perspective might not be representative

    of other stakeholders, and to the extent necessary, engage your colleagues in responding to

    these questions.

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    2/16

    Please note that the survey will close at 5:00pm EST on Wednesday, July 27.

    If you have any questions regarding the survey or require technical assistance, please contact

    Katelyn Mack at [email protected] or by phone at (415) 689-3874.

    Thank you very much for taking the time to complete this survey. We appreciate your

    participation and hope you find the experience valuable for your organizations learning and

    decision-making.>>

    Please identify your organization (the primary KCIC grantee).

    I. Project Implementation and Outcomes (14 Questions)

    1. Have the goals of your project changed since you signed your contract for KCIC funding?

    m Yes (please explain any changes in the space below) ____________________

    m No

    m Don't know

    2. If you were to communicate the single most important outcome of your project this year

    through Twitter, what would you tweet? (i.e., 140 characters or less)

    Through live, interactive webcasts, NOWCastSA enabled hundreds of people to

    participate in significant local civic events or watch later.

    3. We understand that KCIC grantees are in various stages of their project development. Which

    statement below best describes the current stage of your project?

    m Seed/Pre-launch: Project has received funding, but has not yet launched

    m Start-up: Project has recently launched and is still relatively small in terms of resources and

    outputs

    m Proof of concept: Project has demonstrated that it has a viable market and the capacity toserve it

    m Growth: Project is growing rapidly in terms of demand for services, impact, and

    resources at its disposal

    m Established: Project has established itself as a part of the community's information

    ecosystem

    4. Please describe your progress to date toward the following anticipated milestones, outcomes,

    and events as stated in your KCIC contract.

    Ple

    ase

    indi

    cate

    your

    proj

    ects

    pro

    gres

    Please describe how your project has

    contributed to progress toward that

    goal.

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    3/16

    s to

    date

    tow

    ard

    this

    outcome.

    Achi

    eved

    In

    progr

    ess

    Too

    soon

    to tell

    300 words or less

    Outcome #1 NOWCastSA/

    Texas Week project will

    increase the visibility and

    usage of the NOWCastSA

    online neighborhood

    communications platform.

    m m m Every week since the Texas Week

    program launched in January,

    2011, NOWCastSA and KLRNs

    Texas Week work together to

    create a brief promotional segment

    about NOWCastSA. That segmentis always broadcast by KLRN

    at the conclusion of the Texas

    Week program. These spots

    encourage television viewers to go to

    NOWCastSA and engage online.

    (Here is a link to a video we compiled

    of the first 17 promo spots: http://

    youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)

    The traffic that comes to

    NOWCastSA from the klrn.orgwebsite has an 8 percent lower

    bounce rate than our average,

    engages viewers for 8 percent more

    pages per visit than our average

    and, most importantly, 70.73 percent

    are new visitors, meaning KLRN is

    raising awareness amongst people

    who have not been to NOWCastSA

    before through our partnership.

    http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://klrn.org/http://klrn.org/http://klrn.org/http://klrn.org/http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)
  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    4/16

    increase awareness about

    hyperlocal news and

    information to citizens of

    San Antonio and South

    Texas

    m m Each weeks promotional spot

    includes descriptions and images of

    one or more news articles, videos or

    interactive webcasts on NOWCastSA

    about hyperlocal issues.

    The positioning on KLRNs TexasWeek program, and subsequently on

    the on-demand video of that program

    on KLRNs website gives prominence

    to the issues and increases public

    awareness.

    As you can see in the video we

    compiled of the first 17 promo spots

    (http://youtu.be/emO63aeY6so)

    , the promo segments encourage

    viewers to go to NOWCastSA for the

    kind of hyperlocal issues coverage

    they can get nowhere else: full-

    length webcasts of candidate forums,

    planning workshops, public hearings,

    trials; complete archived video of

    all eight San Antonio Independent

    School Districts 2011 high school

    graduations; mini documentaries on

    education efforts of the East Side

    Promise Neighborhood project, tothe immigration reform efforts of

    university students across the city

    who campaigned for the DREAM Act

    by going on a six-week hunger strike;

    photo and video stories by volunteers

    in the community on issues such as

    the childhood obesity epidemic

    Anticipated Outcome #3

    is embedded from KCICcontract

    m m m

    5. We understand that grantees are at various stages of implementation and some projects

    have not yet launched. However, we are interested in knowing more about the outcomes you

    are seeing among the groups your project aims to reach and the communities that you are

    serving. In the past year, we have seen KCIC grantees and projects having impact in their

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    5/16

    communities in different ways, as described in the figure below.

    Which of the following outcomes do you think your project has achieved? Please provide

    supporting evidence for your response on the following page. Select all that apply.

    a We have increasingly reached our target audience(s)

    b We are increasingly engaging our target audience(s)c We have created a more informed community

    d Our community is more civically engaged

    q There is greater media attention to local issues

    q Community organizations are collaborating more

    q Media capacity among nonprofits in our community has increased

    e We have contributed to changes in public policy

    f We have contributed to changes in individual behavior

    q We have achieved a different outcome (please explain): ____________________

    q It is too soon to see outcomes for our project

    6a-j. Please briefly describe what evidence you have of The more detail you provide in

    your responses, the richer the synthesis of grantee responses can be for peer learning and

    information sharing [NOTE: YOU WILL BE ASKED THIS QUESTION FOR EACH OF THE

    OUTCOMES YOU SELECT IN THE QUESTION ABOVE].

    a We have increasingly reached our target audience(s):

    We can tell through views and time on site metrics that we are increasingly reaching

    the target audience of people who want more hyperlocal data and information about

    their community. Two outstanding examples are the Google map we created of local

    Farmers Markets, which has earned almost 24,000 pageviews, and our back-to-school

    story that mapped free immunization clinics and also illustrated San Antonios childhood

    immunization rate by Zip code, which earned 483 unique views in August 2010, withusers spending an average 04:23 minutes on the page.

    b We are increasingly engaging our target audience(s): We know through pageviews,video views and thousands of online chat conversations that we are engaging onetarget audience of people who want to participate more in the democratic process.The best example of this is our special section on the SA2020 envisioning projectincludes transcripts of the real-time conversation (http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020/

    conversation) during which people in the community thanked us for making it possiblefor them to participate online when they could not be physically present in the room. Ouronline community has become so robust that they have asked for their own facilitatorduring workshops, insisted on having online conversations with community leaders whoare in the room, or piped up with smart questions during candidates forums.c We have created a more informed community: We can tell through pageviews, video

    views and time on site that what resonates most with our community are pieces heavy

    with information, for example hours long webcasts of forums on community health data

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    6/16

    or water-rate hearings, candidate forums and workshops on public transportation or

    development have garnered significant attention and interaction.

    d Our community is more civically engaged: We have done 51 live webcasts ofpublic meetings and significant civic events since April 2010, (map here: http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts) In almost every instance, the onlineaudience was bigger than the audience in the room, and our pageviews often doubledor tripled after-the-fact with people who would not have been able to participate in thedemocratic process had NOWCastSA not expanded the room to include them.

    e We have contributed to changes in public policy: After seeing how so many additionalpeople have been able to participate in civic events via NOWCastSAs live, interactivewebcasts, there has been a shift in public policy toward more transparency ingovernment. NOWCastSA is sought out by everyone from neighborhood associationsto utility executives and the city council and mayors office to use our live interactivewebcasts to expand the room to more participants, and also because we archive theentire event so people can see the video for themselves on their own timetable.

    (See video of Rackspace Chairman Graham Weston describing the impact here: http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020 )

    fWe have contributed to changes in individual behavior: NOWCastSAs live webcasts ofpublic events have received, in the aggregate, more than 55,000 video views from peoplewho otherwise would not have been able to watch and participate in these significantcommunity events. In addition, we received thousands of chat comments from peoplewhose voice would not otherwise have been heard or incorporated in the democraticprocess. People did things they could never do before: From a distance, they askedquestions of candidates and community leaders online. Sometimes they demanded theirown online facilitator at workshops. And significantly, during our live webcast of eightSan Antonio High School graduations heres who joined the 2,000 online visitors in San

    Antonio: A mom deployed in Iraq got to watch her son sing the National Anthem, anuncle in Germany got to watch his nephew graduate, in Rome, the son of a school boardmember got to watch his mom deliver the commencement address. And 22 people in thetiny Mexican town of Aguascalientes watched and shared the most important day of theirrelatives lives.

    7. Please tell us which external organizations and individuals have contributed to your project

    this year (e.g., close partners, financial contributors, technical or evaluation support). Please do

    not include Circuit Riders or Knight Foundation staff in your response.

    Partner 1: CI:NOW (Ongoing support with grant applications, in-kind support of facilities throughNOW:Tech and NOW:Data, technical support, marketing)

    Partner 2: San Antonio Area Foundation: ($50,000 in underwriting support in 2011 countstoward matching funds. NOWCastSA also paid SAAF $12,000 for back office support.)Partner 3: KLRN (in-kind on-air promotion and marketing)

    Partner 4: United Way of San Antonio (grants=$75,000 + $15,000 Promise, $10,000 counts

    toward matching funds)

    Partner 5: San Antonio Public Library (in-kind free office space and utilities)

    http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/sa2020http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)http://www.nowcastsa.com/content/nowcastsa-webcasts)
  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    7/16

    Partner 6: Methodist Health Ministries (grants to NOWCastSA through CI:NOW/United Way and

    through the Ecumenical Center for Religion and Health.)

    Partner 7: Rackspace Hosting (in-kind and underwriting $8,400 of Luminaria event, along with

    promotion and marketing.)

    Partner 8: Kit Digital (discounted video hosting services = $6,000)

    Partner 9: San Antonio Independent School District (in-kind technical support during numerouswebcasting events)

    Partner 10: UTSA Downtown (in-kind technical support during significant webcasting eventsl)

    Partner 11: San Antonio Housing Authority (Future contracts through Dept. of Education Choice

    Neighborhood grant in 2011 and 2012)

    Partner 12: Gen TX: (partner in the process of inspiring community engagement)

    Partner 13: Time Warner Cable: (in-kind = $4,500 + technical and marketing support by

    providing high-speed Internet during significant events including Lumanaria.)

    Partner 14: City of San Antonio (SA2020 promotion, in-kind technical support at all SA2020

    events)

    Partner 15: Online Media Legal Network: free legal referal services

    8. Please identify the type of organization for each partner and complete the table below:

    - Please provide a brief explanation of this organizations contribution (20 words or less)

    - How many dollars has this partner contributed to your project since receiving the Knight grant?

    (If not applicable, select 0)

    - Does this contribution count toward the matching requirement? (Yes/No/Not Sure)

    9. Please identify your target audience and describe the strategies that you are using to reach

    and engage these groups.

    The specific

    audience(s) weare trying to inform

    through the project

    are:

    What strategies you

    are using to reachand engage this

    audience online and/

    or offline?

    Which strategies

    have worked well?

    10 words or less 150 words or less 150 words or less

    Target audience 1: people who want to

    engage more in the

    democratic process

    We have turned

    the newsroom

    inside out and

    gone on location

    to about 50 places

    to broadcastlive interactive

    webcasts from the

    event, publishing

    simultaneously on

    multiple platforms

    - video, social

    The webcastshave workedvery well. Wevegotten 55,000video views and

    thousands of chatcomments. Werealso implementinga Groups functionto allow peopleto participate inand subscribe toa group about anissue.

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    8/16

    media and our

    website. We make

    it easy for people

    to comment online

    during events and

    then engage witheach other about

    the issues later.

    Target audience 2: people who want

    hyperlocal data and

    information about

    their community

    In cooperationwith our partnersCI:NOW, NOW:Dataand NOW:Techwe do communityoutreach in-person withgroups of people

    to connect themwith the hyperlocaldata and withNOWCastSA. Werealso implementinga Groups functionin our CMS toallow people toparticipate inand subscribeto a group abouta particular data

    collection or issue.

    We know the in-person meetupsand speakingengagements areeffective becauseafterward, we cansee that peoplesign up for the

    site and begincontributingcontent.

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    9/16

    Target audience 3: people and

    communities who

    are underserved by

    mainstream media

    We use printedflyers to bringpeople toNOWCastSA, wereach out throughlocal televisionthrough the TexasWeek program onKLRN, we do in-person meetupsand speak to localgroups and we usea variety of socialmedia channelsincluding Twitter,

    YouTube andFacebook.Were also putting

    an emphasison mobile. Wetrain people tocontribute contentvia mobile onfeature phonesand we alsopush contentout via SMS thatis optimized formobile.

    While we have notyet measured thenumber of referralsfrom flyers andlocal television,we think it issuccessful becausewe get a great dealof direct traffic,meaning peopletype NOWCastSAinto their browserto reach the site.We know themobile push isworking becauseof the tremendousvideo views on our

    mobile videos.

    Amanda -- drawing on older NOWCastSA documents and also from the boards strategicplanning meeting in January, I put this together:Our targeted audiences are 1) people who want to be civically engaged and to participatein the democratic process; 2) people who want more hyperlocal data and informationabout their local community; 3) people who want to know about or publicize hyperlocalevents in their community and 4) people and communities who are underserved bymainstream media.

    10. What have been your three biggest challenges this year? Please describe how youovercame this challenge or what you tried to do that may or may not have been successful.

    Give us a sense of why your tactics did or did not work as expected. (3000 characters or less)

    1) Corporate structure: Unbeknownst to board members and the managing director,

    NOWCastSA was incorporated as a 509(a)(3) supporting organization to the San Antonio Area

    Foundation in September 2009. This raises questions about journalistic independence and

    also impedes fundraising because we are not an independent 501(c)(3) with the accompanying

    transparency of Forms 990. The NOWCastSA board is adopting more appropriate bylaws,

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    10/16

    correcting the mission statement in the articles of incorporation and is in the process of

    becoming an independent 501(c)(3). We also are filing pro-forma Forms 990 and will make

    them public on NOWCastSA.com and guidestar.org for the benefit of donors.

    2) Raising the visibility of the NOWCastSA website and its content: We focused on

    Search Engine Optimization strategies and also on a website redesign with improved taxonomy

    categories and tagging. We also focused on pushing content out in an email newsletter. Thosetactics worked very well, showing enormous increases in our being found through search

    engines, and quality traffic being referred to the site via the newsletter.

    3) Better connecting people with data from our partner CI:NOW: We directed some web

    development resources to improving the CMS behind CI:NOW and NOW:Data so it would

    integrate more easily with NOWCastSA. That work is nearly finished and should allow better

    integration of data on NOWCastSA and better integration of NOWCastSA content at NOW:Data.

    We also are launching Organic Groups, first on NOWCastSA and then on NOW:Data to better

    capture the conversations around issues and data and to allow people to easily subscribe to

    areas of interest - such as teen pregnancy or education - and to interact with others who share

    that interest.

    11. Do you have any suggestions for how Knight Foundation staff, Circuit Riders, or FSG might

    be able to help you overcome these challenges in the future? (2000 characters or less)

    If others are incorporating as nonprofit organizations, they may need some guidelines

    for the 501(c)(3) process and also some help with bylaws and board development. (Those

    are available at the Hub, of course http://www.npjhub.org/

    12. Reflecting on both your challenges and successes, what three pieces of advice would you

    offer to community and place-based foundations interested in participating in a community

    information project? (3000 characters or less)1) In order to succeed, community information projects need to do things differently -

    they must try new approaches. From a practical standpoint, that means the projects

    goals must be tightly focused, but the projects means cannot be so proscribed that it

    cannot innovate and evolve.

    2) Dont be afraid to fail. It may be belaboring the obvious, but we learn more from failing

    than from success.

    3) Attitude is everything. Make sure that everyone from staff to board members are

    passionate about the vision. Those who are who are not should go find something else

    to do.

    13. To what extent are you concerned with the ongoing sustainability of your project?

    >5 - Not at all

    concerned

    4 3 - Somewhat

    concerned

    2 1 - Very

    concerned

    Level of

    concern:

    m m m m m

    http://guidestar.org/http://guidestar.org/http://guidestar.org/http://guidestar.org/
  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    11/16

    14. Which of the following steps are you taking to generate income to support your projects

    operations?

    q Attracting foundation or government support (e.g., grants) $128,000

    q Increasing individual donor support

    q Securing sponsors or online advertisingq Syndicating content for a fee

    q Fee-for-service activities or events

    q Other contributed or earned income activity (please describe) ____________________

    14a. Please describe the income generating activities that your project is using in the table

    below.

    - How much money has been secured to date through this income stream? (Enter dollar

    value) $39,175

    - To what extent do you see this as contributing to the project's ongoing sustainability?

    (Major contributor i.e., 1/3 or more of income; Minor contributor i.e., 1/3 or less of income;

    Too soon to tell) Amanda -- put the slices of revenue here from your plan

    II. Foundation Engagement (8 Questions)

    We are interested in knowing more about your foundations interest in addressing community

    information needs more broadly. Please respond to the following questions from the perspective

    of the foundation.

    15. Please indicate the degree to which you would agree or disagree with the following

    statements about your foundations attitudes and activities regarding your communitys

    information needs at this point in time.

    Stronglyagree

    Agree Neither Agree nor

    Disagree

    Disagree StronglyDisagree

    Dontknow

    We are very aware

    of our communitys

    information needs

    m m m m m m

    We strongly believe

    our foundation

    should be a leader

    in addressing

    our communityinformation needs

    m m m m m m

    We have made

    a multi-year

    commitment

    to supporting

    information needs

    m m m m m m

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    12/16

    beyond our KCIC

    project

    We are supporting

    a lot of different

    information and

    media-related

    projects in our

    community

    m m m m m m

    Our boards support

    for addressing

    community

    information

    needs has greatly

    increased in the last

    3 years

    m m m m m m

    We are greatly

    concerned about

    building our own

    capacity to better

    address community

    information needs

    m m m m m m

    We are constantly

    talking to/engaging

    with other

    funders about

    the importance

    of addressing

    community

    information needs

    m m m m m m

    Our key community

    stakeholders seeus as a leader

    in and resource

    for addressing

    community

    information needs

    m m m m m m

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    13/16

    16. In what ways, if any, have your foundations attitudes and activities changed with regard to

    community information, media and communications since beginning your project?

    The Foundation has become more aware of the value and importance of

    communications role to the mission, especially in training nonprofits, communicating

    community issues and bringing community awareness to Foundation Communityinitiatives.

    17. From June 2010 to June 2011, how many dollars did your foundation contribute to your

    KCIC project and any other foundation efforts to address community information needs?

    Please enter the dollar amount only under each category: unrestricted, restricted, and donor

    advised funds. Please put "0" (zero) in the spaces, where your foundation has not contributed

    funds. Note: you will not be able to progress in the survey if any fields are left blank.

    Unrestricted Restricted Donor Advised

    Enter $ value Enter $ value Enter $ value

    KCIC Project $100,000 0 0

    Other efforts to

    address community

    information needs

    18. Did your foundation begin funding information and media projects within the past three

    years?

    m Yes, we started funding information and media in the past three years (2008 or later)

    m No, we were funding information and media more than three years ago (before 2008)

    m Dont know

    19. In the next three years, do you anticipate that the proportion of your foundations funding

    dedicated to community information needs will increase, decrease, or remain the same?

    m Will increase

    m Will stay the same

    m Will decrease

    m Don't know

    20. To what extent has your involvement in your KCIC project helped your foundation to

    broaden its pool of donors?5 - To

    a great

    extent

    4 3 -

    Somewhat

    2 1 - Not at

    all

    Don't

    know

    Extent of

    help

    m m m m m m

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    14/16

    21. When thinking about the different initiatives and projects that your foundation is involved in,

    where does your KCIC project rank in terms of value and importance to the foundations overall

    strategy and mission?

    m This is currently the foundations most important project

    m This is one of the foundations most important projectsm The project is as important as other projects in our grantmaking portfolio

    m This project is of somewhat lesser importance than much of the foundations other work

    m This project is of little or no importance relative to our foundations overall strategy or mission

    22. When your KCIC grant period ends, how does your foundation plan to be involved with this

    KCIC project? (1000 characters or less)

    The projects impact is growing daily in meeting the goal of becoming a dependable

    source of information relevant to all. When fully implemented, the community will

    recognize its value and relevance to all sectors of our City and we anticipate it becoming

    self sustaining thru grants, city funding, underwriting/sponsorships etc. The SAAF has

    pledged $50,000 per the next three years and in collaboration with other funders will

    meet the match and project budget.

    III. Knight Foundation Resources and Feedback (6 Questions)

    23. In the past 12 months, what Knight resources have you, your board and staff, or

    implementing partners used? Select all that apply.

    q Boot Camp

    q Media Learning Seminar

    q 1-on-1 technical assistance from Circuit Riders on how to design/implement your

    projectq Circuit Rider conference calls and webinars

    q 1-on-1 technical assistance from FSG on how to evaluate your project

    q Knight-sponsored applicant webinar

    q FSG evaluation webinar

    q Knight Foundation website (www.knightfoundation.org)

    q Information needs website (www.informationneeds.org)

    q Community Information Toolkit (www.infotoolkit.org)

    q Practical Guide to Evaluating Community Information Projects

    q Other (please describe) ____________________

    q We have not used any Knight resources in the past 12 months

    23a. How helpful was the following with...

    - 2 Connecting you with other grantees (scale from 1-3)

    - 3 Accessing external resources (scale from 1-3)

    - 3 Building your capacity to implement or evaluate your project (scale from 1-3)

    24. Is there is anything else that you would like Knight Foundation to know that we havent

    asked you about, please tell us in the space below.

  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    15/16

    (Amanda -- can you excerpts from contest entries)

    25. Do you have any recommendations for how we might improve this survey to make it more

    useful to Knight and grantees next year?

    26. In completing this survey, what process did you use, and whom did you involve? Pleaseprovide position in organization and role in the project.

    Charlotte-Anne Lucas, Managing Director, NOWCastSA

    Amanda Evrard, Director of Development, NOWCastSA

    Reggie Williams, CEO of the San Antonio Area Foundation

    Jeff Sauter, CFO of the San Antonio Area Foundation

    NOWCastSA Board Members: Pilar Oates, Bill Israel, Steve Blanchard

    27. TheKnight Community Information Challenge website includes descriptions of each grantee

    project. Please provide us with an updated description in the space provided or note in the box

    below that the original description is still accurate and appropriate for external communications

    purposes.

    The original description is still accurate, however it would be nice to include a link to the

    site along with the mission:

    NOWCastSA's mission is to promote and facilitate an inclusive civic conversation

    by empowering neighbors to identify common issues and share information through

    education, training, community news, events and multimedia.

    28. Please provide a brief (1-2 paragraph) update on what has been happening with your

    project that can be shared with others on the InformationNeeds.org website. (1000 characters or

    less)

    >>

    Thank you for completing this survey!

    Please remember to send documentation of matching funds and a completed financial

    report to [email protected] by Wednesday, July 27, 2011. Please note that your

    grant financial report should cover actual contributions and expenditures from July 1, 2010

    June 30, 2011. If you need to make changes to the financial report after the July deadline,

    please send those to [email protected].

    Click here (link to email) to send documentation of matching funds and a completed financial

    report right now.

    Are you ready to submit your responses to the Knight Foundation?

    m Yes

    http://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/thirdhttp://www.informationneeds.org/community-information-challenge/winners/third
  • 8/3/2019 KCIC Fall2011 Grantee Survey

    16/16

    Once you click on the >> button below, you will not be able to return to the survey.

    Thank you for completing this survey!

    Circuit Riders will be in touch with you in the next few weeks to collect website analytics

    information to further assist grantees in project implementation.