keeping families together: an evaluation of implementation and outcomes

16
Keeping Families Together: An evaluation of implementation and outcomes of a pilot supportive housing model for families involved with the child welfare system June 9, 2011 Sponsored By: The Corporation for Supportive Housing with funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Presented By: Rebecca Swann-Jackson

Upload: sydnee-cervantes

Post on 01-Jan-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

June 9, 2011. Keeping Families Together: An evaluation of implementation and outcomes of a pilot supportive housing model for families involved with the child welfare system. Sponsored By: The Corporation for Supportive Housing with funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

Keeping Families Together:

An evaluation of implementation and outcomes of a pilot supportive housing model for families involved with the child welfare system

June 9, 2011

Sponsored By:

The Corporation for Supportive Housing with funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Presented By:

Rebecca Swann-Jackson

Page 2: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

2

Profile of KFT Families

• 29 families—Primarily female-headed minority families with two children– Average age: 39 years old, ranging from 22 to

52 years – Education: less than high school (69%)

• History of substance abuse (96%) and/or diagnosed with mental illness (54%)

Page 3: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

3

Intergenerational Trauma History

Page 4: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

4

Substantial History of Shelter Use

• Family and adult shelter stays for KFT families and heads of household before supportive housing:– 17,451 total shelter days – $1,400,237 estimated cost ($95/day/family,

$64/day/single)

Page 5: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

5

Profile of KFT Children86 minor children:

• Moved into supportive housing: 43 (50%)

–Those with open ACS cases: 37 (86%)

• In foster care placement: 25 (29%)

• In an informal placement: 3 (3.5%)

• Parental rights terminated: 15 (17.5%)

Page 6: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

6

Foster Care Duration and Cost• 48 children had at least one foster care spell which

averaged 1,244 days (3.4 years) and ranged from 35 to 5,369 days

• 14 of these children had a second foster care spell, averaging 1,284 days (3.5 years) with a range of 74 to 5,165 days

• KFT families cumulatively have used 75,931 foster care days from 1991-2010; estimated cost of $7,365,307 ($97 per day)

Page 7: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

7

Outcomes for Families: Residential stability

• 26 of 29 KFT families achieved residential stability—tenants remained housed from 10 to 31 months from move-in to end of pilot

• Two of the three families who chose to move out of the KFT pilot returned to shelter for 503 and 19 days, respectively

Page 8: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

8

Outcomes for Families: Child well-being

• 22 of the 37 ACS cases (61%) were closed

• 14 preventive services cases were closed – Average case duration was 22 months (range

of 6 to 31 months)– Cases closed, on average, within 10 months of

the family’s move to supportive housing (range of 3 to 22 months)

Page 9: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

9

Outcomes for Families: Child well-being

• All of the six children in foster care with a goal of reunification were returned to their families

• As of May 31, 2010, five of the six (83.3%) reunified children had been back with their families for more than 12 months

– The sixth child had been reunified for six months and was on track to meet the 12-month goal

.

Page 10: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

10

Duration of Formal Placements (Pre and Post KFT)

151

118

138

138

168

-264

-174

-611

-1008

-1008

-1013

31

469

505

505

337

775

936

-1200 -800 -400 0 400 800 1200

Child 6

Child 5

Child 4

Child 3

Child 2

Child 1

Days

Duration from Placement to Move in

Duration from Move In to Reunification

Duration from Reunification to January 2011

Page 11: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

Outcomes for Families: Child well-being

• Three children (ages two, three, and four) have no history of ACS involvement

• Two cases were reopened

• No children were removed from the home during the pilot

• The number of indicated abuse/neglect cases decreased from pre-pilot to the end of KFT

11

Page 12: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

12

Indicated Abuse/Neglect Cases Before and During KFT

13

101

0

12

24

36

48

60

72

84

96

108

120

Pre-move Post-move

Num

ber

of H

isto

rica

l Indic

ated

Cas

es for

Fam

ilies

(N

=22

)

(198

9-20

10)

Page 13: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

• After KFT, there were only 13 indicated abuse/neglect cases

• 14 of the 22 families had no subsequent indicated abuse/neglect cases

Page 14: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

14

Indicated Abuse/Neglect Before and During KFT

Figure 5, page 36, in report

Page 15: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

15

Outcomes for Families: Children’s school attendance

• School-age children showed a steady average increase in school attendance

Page 16: Keeping Families Together:  An evaluation of implementation and outcomes

16

Contact Information

Rebecca Swann-Jackson, Research Associate [email protected]