kelompok cibi cibi
TRANSCRIPT
Gage Name:
Date of Study:
Performed By:
Notes:
Process Tolerance
USL: 20 10
LSL: -20
StDev Multiplier: 6.00
Operator A jhony Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
Reading 1 15 18 10Reading 2 15.5 18.5 9.5Reading 3 15.3 18.6 9.4
45.8 55.1 28.9
Operator B tina Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
Reading 1 15.5 18.5 9.5Reading 2 15.3 18.5 9.3Reading 3 15 18 10
45.8 55 28.8
Operator C galih Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
Reading 1 14.5 18.2 9.5Reading 2 15 18 10Reading 3 14.6 18.6 9.6
44.1 54.8 29.1
Gage R&R Metrics
Variance
Component
% Contribution of
Variance
Component StDev
Gage R&R: 0.190851852 0.03 0.436865943
Operator (AV Appraiser Variation): 0.006555556 0.00 0.080966385
Operator * Part (INT Interaction): 0.011074074 0.00 0.105233427
Reproducibility (SQRT(AV^2 + INT^2)): 0.01762963 0.00 0.132776616
Repeatability (EV Equipment Variation): 0.173222222 0.03 0.416199738
Part Variation (PV): 674.9329136 99.97 25.979471
Total Variation (TV): 675.1237654 100.00 25.98314387
Notes:
1. AIAG recommended study includes: 10 Parts, 3 Operators and 3 Replicates. The template calculations will work wi
2. The data should be balanced with each operator measuring the same number of parts and the same number of rep
3. Enter process Upper Specification Limit (USL) and Lower Specification Limit (LSL) in the Process Tolerance windo
4. The default StDev multiplier is 6. Change this to 5.15 if AIAG convention is being used.
5. The cells shaded in light blue highlight the critical metrics Gage R&R % Total Variation (also known as %R&R) and
6. < 10% = Good Measurement System; > 30% = Bad Measurement System.
SigmaXL Copyright © 2004 - 2011
3 3
Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Part 9 Part 10
16.1 31.5 30.5 46 73 74 69
16.7 31.3 29.8 46.2 73.5 75 71.2
15.9 30.5 29 46.5 73.8 74.7 71
48.7 93.3 89.3 138.7 220.3 223.7 211.2
Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Part 9 Part 10
16.5 31.2 29.5 46.2 73.5 75 71.1
16 31 30.2 46.3 74 75 71.3
16.4 31.4 30 46.5 73.7 74.8 71
48.9 93.6 89.7 139 221.2 224.8 213.4
Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Part 9 Part 10
16 30.5 29.6 46.5 74.2 75.5 71
15.7 31.1 29.5 46.2 74.4 74.8 69.5
16.1 31 29.3 46 74 75 69.7
47.8 92.6 88.4 138.7 222.6 225.3 210.2
StDev *
Multiplier
% Total
Variation (TV) % Tolerance
2.621195656 1.68 6.55
0.485798312 0.31 1.21
0.63140056 0.41 1.58
0.796659693 0.51 1.99
2.49719843 1.60 6.24
155.876826 99.99 389.69
155.8988632 100.00 389.75
h a minimum of 2 Operators, 2 Parts and 2 Replicates.
licates.
. This is used to determine the % Tolerance metrics. If the specification is single-sided, leave both entries blank.
Create Stacked Column Format
for "Analyze Gage R&R" >>
Tolerance.
20512.71
21050.5
20922.25
21005.59
21120.25
21033.9
21103.29
20828.04
20805.07
188371.2
188381.6
133696.1
3468.8
133695.3
188366.7
155.8989
40
0.79666
0.511011
1.991649
0.132777
6.552989
699.34 1012.21 278.61 790.91 790.91 2659.29 6412.69 16177.69
699.34 1008.5 276.74 797.21 797.21 2682.29 6440.38 16309.94
648.41 1001.2 282.41 761.7 761.7 2604.9 6412.69 16517
135.7 164.9 86.8 145.4 279.5 267.4 416.4 664.1
2046.054 3021.334 837.1378 2349.018 8680.027778 7944.751 19265.44 49003.20111
10.39333 0.806222222 54671.424
0.173222 0.403111111 6074.602667
0.4162 0.080966385 25.979471
2.497198 0.485798312 99.98586442
1.601807 0.311611196 155.876826
0.173222 0.006555556 674.9329136
6.242996 1.21449578 389.692065
25.98314
389.7472
SigmaXL Gage R&R
16681.09 14871.44 62478.946667 62485.46 1155
16845.04 15179.9 63158.460000 63159.74 1160.2
16920.29 14729.34 62733.800000 62736.4 1153.6
673.8 634.8
50445.16 44774.56
0.206444444 54686.34
1.191789609
0.105233427 0.436866
0.405006519
0.63140056 2.621196
0.011074074 0.190852
1.578501399 1.681344
Part Operator Reading
Part 01 Operator A 15
Part 02 Operator A 18
Part 03 Operator A 10
Part 04 Operator A 16.1
Part 05 Operator A 31.5
Part 06 Operator A 30.5
Part 07 Operator A 46
Part 08 Operator A 73
Part 09 Operator A 74
Part 10 Operator A 69
Part 01 Operator B 15.5
Part 02 Operator B 18.5
Part 03 Operator B 9.5
Part 04 Operator B 16.5
Part 05 Operator B 31.2
Part 06 Operator B 29.5
Part 07 Operator B 46.2
Part 08 Operator B 73.5
Part 09 Operator B 75
Part 10 Operator B 71.1
Part 01 Operator C 14.5
Part 02 Operator C 18.2
Part 03 Operator C 9.5
Part 04 Operator C 16
Part 05 Operator C 30.5
Part 06 Operator C 29.6
Part 07 Operator C 46.5
Part 08 Operator C 74.2
Part 09 Operator C 75.5
Part 10 Operator C 71
Part 01 Operator A 15.5
Part 02 Operator A 18.5
Part 03 Operator A 9.5
Part 04 Operator A 16.7
Part 05 Operator A 31.3
Part 06 Operator A 29.8
Part 07 Operator A 46.2
Part 08 Operator A 73.5
Part 09 Operator A 75
Part 10 Operator A 71.2
Part 01 Operator B 15.3
Part 02 Operator B 18.5
Part 03 Operator B 9.3
Part 04 Operator B 16
Part 05 Operator B 31
Part 06 Operator B 30.2
Part 07 Operator B 46.3
Part 08 Operator B 74
Part 09 Operator B 75
Part 10 Operator B 71.3
Part 01 Operator C 15
Part 02 Operator C 18
Part 03 Operator C 10
Part 04 Operator C 15.7
Part 05 Operator C 31.1
Part 06 Operator C 29.5
Part 07 Operator C 46.2
Part 08 Operator C 74.4
Part 09 Operator C 74.8
Part 10 Operator C 69.5
Part 01 Operator A 15.3
Part 02 Operator A 18.6
Part 03 Operator A 9.4
Part 04 Operator A 15.9
Part 05 Operator A 30.5
Part 06 Operator A 29
Part 07 Operator A 46.5
Part 08 Operator A 73.8
Part 09 Operator A 74.7
Part 10 Operator A 71
Part 01 Operator B 15
Part 02 Operator B 18
Part 03 Operator B 10
Part 04 Operator B 16.4
Part 05 Operator B 31.4
Part 06 Operator B 30
Part 07 Operator B 46.5
Part 08 Operator B 73.7
Part 09 Operator B 74.8
Part 10 Operator B 71
Part 01 Operator C 14.6
Part 02 Operator C 18.6
Part 03 Operator C 9.6
Part 04 Operator C 16.1
Part 05 Operator C 31
Part 06 Operator C 29.3
Part 07 Operator C 46
Part 08 Operator C 74
Part 09 Operator C 75
Part 10 Operator C 69.7
Label Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading 3
A - 1 15 15.5 15.3
A - 2 18 18.5 18.6
A - 3 10 9.5 9.4
A - 4 16.1 16.7 15.9
A - 5 31.5 31.3 30.5
A - 6 30.5 29.8 29
A - 7 46 46.2 46.5
A - 8 73 73.5 73.8
A - 9 74 75 74.7
A - 10 69 71.2 71
B - 1 15.5 15.3 15
B - 2 18.5 18.5 18
B - 3 9.5 9.3 10
B - 4 16.5 16 16.4
B - 5 31.2 31 31.4
B - 6 29.5 30.2 30
B - 7 46.2 46.3 46.5
B - 8 73.5 74 73.7
B - 9 75 75 74.8
B - 10 71.1 71.3 71
C - 1 14.5 15 14.6
C - 2 18.2 18 18.6
C - 3 9.5 10 9.6
C - 4 16 15.7 16.1
C - 5 30.5 31.1 31
C - 6 29.6 29.5 29.3
C - 7 46.5 46.2 46
C - 8 74.2 74.4 74
C - 9 75.5 74.8 75
C - 10 71 69.5 69.7
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM STUDY FOR ATTRIBUTE DATA (Recommend 3 Appraisers, 2 Repeat
Product/Unit Name:
Date of Study:
Performed By:
Notes:
Good Part or Unit:
Bad Part or Unit:
Part True Standard Trial # 1 Trial #2
1 NG NG NG
2 G G G
3 G G G
4 NG NG NG
5 NG NG NG
6 G G G
7 NG G G
8 G G G
9 G G G
10 NG NG NG
11 NG NG NG
12 G G G
13 NG G G
14 G G G
15 NG NG NG
16 NG G G
17 G G G
18 NG NG NG
19 G G G
20 G G NG
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Attribute MSA Analysis:
Within Appraiser Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
A 20 19 95.00% 75.13%
B 20 18 90.00% 68.30%
joni
Create Stacked Column f
with "Attribute MSA (
C 20 18 90.00% 68.30%
Each Appraiser vs Standard Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
A 20 16 80.00% 56.34%
B 20 16 80.00% 56.34%
C 20 16 80.00% 56.34%
Between Appraiser Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
20 15 75.00% 50.90%
All Appraisers vs Standard Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
20 15 75.00% 50.90%
Notes:
1. Recommend study includes: 3 Appraisers, 2 to 3 Replicates, minimum of 10 Good Parts and 10 Bad Parts.
2. The data should be balanced with each appraiser evaluating the same number of parts and the same number of replicates
3. Specify the Good Part or Unit as “G” or other appropriate text (“P”, “Y”, etc.). Specify the Bad Part or Unit as “NG” or other
4. Be careful to avoid typing or spelling errors when entering the results. A space accidentally inserted after a character will
SigmaXL Copyright © 2004 - 2011
, Minimum of 10 Good Parts and 10 Bad Parts)"
0=Correct Appraisal
1=Incorrect Appraisal
Trial # 1 Trial #2 Trial # 1 Trial #2 joni Iki Tina
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
G G G G 0 0 0
G G G G 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
G NG NG NG 0 1 0
G G NG G 0 0 1
G G G G 0 0 0
G G G G 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
G G G G 0 0 0
G NG NG G 0 1 1
G G G G 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
G G G G 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 0 0 0
G G G G 0 0 0
NG NG NG NG 1 0 0
1 2 2
95% UC
Cohen's
Kappa
99.87%
98.77%
Iki Tina Within Appraiser Error
r
mat to Analyze
Binary)" >>
98.77%
Type I = False Reject (Appraiser Rejected Good Part)
Type II = False Accept (Appraiser Accepted Bad Part)
Mixed = Assessments across trials are not identical
95% UC
Type I
Errors
Type I
Error %
Type II
Errors
Type II
Error %
Mixed
Error
Mixed
Error %
Cohen's
Kappa
94.27% 0 0 1 5.00% #VALUE!
94.27% 0 0 2 10.00% #VALUE!
94.27% 0 0 2 10.00% #VALUE!
95% UC
91.34%
95% UC
Cohen's
Kappa
91.34% #VALUE!
.
appropriate text (“F”, “N”, etc.).
e treated as a different value leading to incorrect results.
0=Does Not Match Condition
1=Matches Condition
G/G G/NG NG/G NG/NG
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0
Proportions: Proportions:
p_obs: p_obs:
p_chance: p_chance:
Within Appraiser A - Cohen's Kappa Calculations
A: Temp B: Conc C: Supplier Yield
45 15 1 78.4
25 5 0 43.3
0=Does Not Match Condition 0=Does Not Matc
1=Matches Condition 1=Matches Condi
G/G G/NG NG/G NG/NG G/G
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0 0
Proportions:
p_obs:
p_chance:
Within Appraiser B - Cohen's Kappa Calculations Within Ap
h Condition 0=Correct Appraisal
tion 1=Incorrect Appraisal
G/NG NG/G NG/NG Appraiser A Appraiser B Appraiser C
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 1
Count:
0 0 0 0 4 4 4
raiser C - Cohen's Kappa Calculations Appraiser vs Standard Error
0=Does Not Match Condition
1=Matches Condition
G/G G/NG NG/G NG/NG
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0
Proportions: Proportions:
p_obs: p_obs:
p_chance: p_chance:
Appraiser A vs Std. Trial 1 - Cohen's Kappa Calculations
002 A: Temp 25 45
004 C: Supplier 5 15
006 AC 0 1
0=Does Not Match Condition 0=Does Not Matc
1=Matches Condition 1=Matches Condi
G/G G/NG NG/G NG/NG G/G
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0 0
Proportions:
p_obs:
p_chance:
Appraiser A vs Std. Trial 2 - Cohen's Kappa Calculations Appraiser
53.7
67.5
54.7
67.7
44.2
78.4
45.4
77.7
53.9
67.3
55.4
68.8
44.6
77.1
43.3
78.3
h Condition 0=Does Not Match Condition
tion 1=Matches Condition
G/NG NG/G NG/NG G/G G/NG
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0 0
Proportions:
p_obs:
p_chance:
vs Std. Trial 1 - Cohen's Kappa Calculations Appraiser B vs Std. Trial 2 -
-1 -1
1 -1
-1 -1
1 -1
-1 1
1 1
-1 1
1 1
-1 -1
1 -1
-1 -1
1 -1
-1 1
1 1
-1 1
1 1
0=Does Not Match Condition
1=Matches Condition
NG/G NG/NG G/G G/NG NG/G
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0 0
Proportions:
p_obs:
p_chance:
ohen's Kappa Calculations Appraiser C vs Std. Trial 1 - Cohen's Kappa C
1
-1
1
-1
-1
1
-1
1
1
-1
1
-1
-1
1
-1
1
0=Does Not Match Condition
1=Matches Condition
NG/NG G/G G/NG NG/G NG/NG
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0 0
Proportions:
p_obs:
p_chance:
lculations Appraiser C vs Std. Trial 2 - Cohen's Kappa Calculations
Type I = False Reject (Appraiser Rejected Good Part) Type II = False Accept (Appraiser
Appraiser A Appraiser B Appraiser C Appraiser A Appraiser B
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Count:
0 0 0 0 0 0
Appraiser vs Standard Error Type I Appraiser vs Standard E
0=Correct Appraisal
ccepted Bad Part) Mixed = Assessments across trials are not identical 1=Incorrect Appraisal
Appraiser C Appraiser A Appraiser B Appraiser C
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 1 2 2 0
ror Type II Appraiser vs Standard Mixed Error
Number of Standard
Good Parts
0=Correct Appraisal 0=Correct Appraisal 0=Correct Appraisal
1=Incorrect Appraisal 1=Incorrect Appraisal 1=Incorrect Appraisal
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 1
0 1 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 1
0 5 5
All Appraisers vs
Standard Error
Number of Standard
Bad Parts
Between Appraiser
Error
Part Result Appraiser Standart
1 NG Jhony NG
2 G Jhony G
3 G Jhony G
4 NG Jhony NG
5 NG Jhony NG
6 G Jhony G
7 G Jhony NG
8 G Jhony G
9 G Jhony G
10 NG Jhony NG
11 NG Jhony NG
12 G Jhony G
13 G Jhony NG
14 G Jhony G
15 NG Jhony NG
16 G Jhony NG
17 G Jhony G
18 NG Jhony NG
19 G Jhony G
20 G Jhony G
1 NG Jhony NG
2 G Jhony G
3 G Jhony G
4 NG Jhony NG
5 NG Jhony NG
6 G Jhony G
7 G Jhony NG
8 G Jhony G
9 G Jhony G
10 NG Jhony NG
11 NG Jhony NG
12 G Jhony G
13 G Jhony NG
14 G Jhony G
15 NG Jhony NG
16 G Jhony NG
17 G Jhony G
18 NG Jhony NG
19 G Jhony G
20 NG Jhony G
1 NG Iky NG
2 G Iky G
3 G Iky G
4 NG Iky NG
5 NG Iky NG
6 G Iky G
7 G Iky NG
8 G Iky G
9 G Iky G
10 NG Iky NG
11 NG Iky NG
12 G Iky G
13 G Iky NG
14 G Iky G
15 NG Iky NG
16 NG Iky NG
17 G Iky G
18 NG Iky NG
19 G Iky G
20 NG Iky G
1 NG Iky NG
2 G Iky G
3 G Iky G
4 NG Iky NG
5 NG Iky NG
6 NG Iky G
7 G Iky NG
8 G Iky G
9 G Iky G
10 NG Iky NG
11 NG Iky NG
12 G Iky G
13 NG Iky NG
14 G Iky G
15 NG Iky NG
16 NG Iky NG
17 G Iky G
18 NG Iky NG
19 G Iky G
20 NG Iky G
1 NG Tina NG
2 G Tina G
3 G Tina G
4 NG Tina NG
5 NG Tina NG
6 NG Tina G
7 NG Tina NG
8 G Tina G
9 G Tina G
10 NG Tina NG
11 NG Tina NG
12 G Tina G
13 NG Tina NG
14 G Tina G
15 NG Tina NG
16 NG Tina NG
17 G Tina G
18 NG Tina NG
19 G Tina G
20 NG Tina G
1 NG Tina NG
2 G Tina G
3 G Tina G
4 NG Tina NG
5 NG Tina NG
6 NG Tina G
7 G Tina NG
8 G Tina G
9 G Tina G
10 NG Tina NG
11 NG Tina NG
12 G Tina G
13 G Tina NG
14 G Tina G
15 NG Tina NG
16 NG Tina NG
17 G Tina G
18 NG Tina NG
19 G Tina G
20 NG Tina G
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM STUDY FOR BINARY ATTRIBUTE DATA - ANALYSIS REPORT
Product/Unit Name:
Date of Study:
Performed By:
Notes:
Within Appraiser Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
Iky 20 18 90.00 68.30
Jhony 20 19 95.00 75.13
Tina 20 18 90.00 68.30
Each Appraiser vs Standard Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
Iky 20 16 80.00 56.34
Jhony 20 16 80.00 56.34
Tina 20 16 80.00 56.34
Each Appraiser vs Standard Disagreement: Type I Errors
Type I
Error %
Type II
Errors
Type II
Error %
Iky 1 10.00 1 10.00
Jhony 0 0.00 3 30.00
Tina 2 20.00 0 0.00
Between Appraiser Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
20 15 75.00 50.90
All Appraisers vs Standard Agreement: # Inspected # Matched Percent 95% LC
20 15 75.00 50.90
Attribute MSA Data:
Part Standart Iky 1 Iky 2 Jhony 1
1 NG NG NG NG
2 G G G G
3 G G G G
4 NG NG NG NG
5 NG NG NG NG
6 G G NG G
7 NG G G G
8 G G G G
9 G G G G
10 NG NG NG NG
11 NG NG NG NG
12 G G G G
13 NG G NG G
14 G G G G
15 NG NG NG NG
16 NG NG NG G
17 G G G G
18 NG NG NG NG
19 G G G G
20 G NG NG G
95% UC
e ss
Kappa
e ss
P-Value
98.77 0.8000 0.0002
99.87 0.8933 0.0000
98.77 0.7980 0.0002
95% UC
Fleiss'
Kappa
Fleiss'
P-Value
94.27 0.6992 0.0000
94.27 0.6445 0.0000
94.27 0.6990 0.0000
Mixed
Error
Mixed
Error %
Error
Type Assessment
True
Standard
2 10.00 Type I: 1 0
1 5.00 Type II: 0 1
2 10.00 Mixed:
95% UC
Fleiss'
Kappa
Fleiss'
P-Value
91.34 0.7661 0.0000
95% UC
Fleiss'
Kappa
Fleiss'
P-Value
91.34 0.6809 0.0000
Jhony 2 Tina 1 Tina 2
NG NG NG
G G G
G G G
NG NG NG
NG NG NG
G NG NG
G NG G
G G G
G G G
NG NG NG
NG NG NG
G G G
Assessments across trials are not identical
G NG G
G G G
NG NG NG
G NG NG
G G G
NG NG NG
G G G
NG NG NG