keokuk community report · comprehensive assessment • in a secure and nurturing environment that...

Keokuk Community ReportSchool Board PresentationAugust 15, 2016

Keokuk Community Schools Mission Statement

The Keokuk Community School District provides an

educational foundation where students are active

participants in becoming adaptable and critical thinkers

along with achieving the skills necessary

(academic/vocational) for lifetime success. (Dec. 2008)

2

2015-2016Beliefs of the Keokuk School DistrictWe believe:

• Child development and education are the highest priorities for the Keokuk Community School District

• In students mastering basic academic skills in the early grades confirmed by comprehensive assessment

• In identifying proficiencies in all levels and content areas based on high standards and confirmed by comprehensive assessment

• In a secure and nurturing environment that builds self-esteem

• In a learning environment appropriate for the changing needs of our studentsand work world

• In clean and safe facilities

3

2015-2016Beliefs of the Keokuk Community School District Cont…

• In schools which value and understand each student’ uniqueness and enable all students to reach their full potential

• In treating all students with respect

• In the development of social responsibility and citizenship

• Schools should create opportunities for exploration and preparation for a diversity of careers

• In providing effective professional staff leadership

• That staff are more effective when supported by family and community

• That involvement by and communication among the community, family, staffand learners is vital to education at all levels

• In utilizing technology to improve student achievement

4

2015-2016Objectives of the Keokuk Community School District

1. Provide a safe learning environment where each student is accepted, valued, respected, encouraged and supported.

2. Provide a wide range of programs that actively engage and assist students in becoming critical thinkers and good citizens.

3. Build a curriculum that focuses on learning and assessment.

4. Provide preparation for a diversity of careers to enrich students’ future which may require college, special training, or technical skills.

5. Increase student, faculty, family and community participation in the educational environment.

6. Ensure all staff have the necessary training, skills, and knowledge to support the educational environment.

7. Provide efficient, clean, safe, well-maintained and well-equipped facilities to createa positive learning environment.

5

2015-2016Long-Term KCSD District Goals

1. We will increase the number of students who show a year’s plus growth on district assessments by improving teaching and learning practices.

1. We will improve the culture and climate in the district through the use of Positive Behavior and Intervention and Supports (PBIS).

1. We will begin to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum, and continue to improve quality instructional strategies through the use of various resources including technology.

6

7

Data Analysis2015 – 2016 Summative Data

2015-2016District Assessments

Administered

• Iowa Assessment • Grades 2-11 in April

• Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP)• Grades K-11 (Fall, Winter and Spring)

• Reading, Math, Science (Not all buildings administer Science)

• Pre-School GOLD Assessment

• Classroom Formative/Summative Assessments

• Individual Growth Development Indicators (IGDI) (PreK)

• Formative Assessment System for Teachers (FAST) Assessment (K-3)

What our data indicates are our areas of strength, needs for

growth, and areas of disproportionality.

8

2015-2016 KCSD IA Assessment4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Reading

Grades 4, 8, and 11 % Proficient as measured by Iowa Assessment (Reading)

2015-2016 KCSD IA Assessment4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Math

2015-2016 KCSD IA Assessment4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Science

2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced

Grade Reading Math Science

2nd 70% 56% 53%

3rd 68% 75% 77%

4th 71% 78% 81%

5th 77% 74% 74%

6th 76% 71% 70%

7th 70% 75% 73%

8th 74% 66% 78%

9th 78% 74% 72%

10th 84% 79% 75%

11th 68% 72% 60%

2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Advanced


2nd 14% 15% 6%

3rd 11% 22% 18%

4th 23% 23% 20%

5th 25% 21% 16%

6th 21% 15% 12%

7th 19% 15% 13%

8th 14% 10% 13%

9th 18% 7% 9%

10th 22% 9% 12%

11th 8% 16% 18%

2014-2015All (FAY) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient


2nd 64% 62% 56%

3rd 75% 79% 80%

4th 80% 76% 88%

5th 78% 79% 85%

6th 74% 75% 74%

7th 66% 75% 72%

8th 56% 63% 80%

9th 75% 72% 74%

10th 79% 76% 72%

11th 68% 68% 66%

2014-2015/2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced

Grade 2014-2015

Reading

2015-2016

Reading

2014-2015

Math

2015-2016

Math

2014-2015

Science

2015-2016

Science

2nd 64% 70% 62% 55% 56% 54%

3rd 75% 68% 79% 75% 80% 78%

4th 80% 71% 76% 78% 88% 84%

5th 78% 77% 79% 74% 85% 78%

6th 74% 76% 75% 71% 74% 73%

7th 66% 70% 75% 75% 72% 77%

8th 56% 74% 63% 66% 80% 82%

9th 75% 78% 72% 74% 74% 77%

10th 79% 84% 76% 79% 72% 80%

11th 68% 64% 68% 73% 66% 66%

2015-20162nd Grade IA Assessment % Proficient

Subgroup Reading Math Science

All 70% 56% 53%

White 69% 54% 57%

African American 67% 44% 22%

Hispanic 75% 50% 50%

Students with an IEP 18% 18% 27%

Students without an

IEP

74% 58% 56%

Free/Reduced 66% 54% 50%

Non Free/Reduced 81% 58% 67%

2015-20163rd Grade IA Assessment % Proficient


All 68% 75% 77%

White 67% 75% 79%


Hispanic 67% 100% 100%


Students without an

IEP

75% 78% 79%



2015-20164th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient


All 71% 78% 81%

White 74% 80% 85%




Students without an

IEP

85% 90% 92%





All 77% 74% 74%

White 76% 77% 76%




Students without an

IEP

87% 83% 86%





All 76% 71% 70%

White 76% 72% 74%




Students without an

IEP

85% 82% 79%





All 70% 75% 73%

White 69% 75% 80%


Hispanic 100% 71% 72%


Students without an

IEP

73% 80% 83%





All 74% 66% 78%

White 76% 68% 83%




Students without an

IEP

85% 80% 91%





All 78% 74% 72%

White 80% 75% 78%




Students without an

IEP

85% 81% 86%





All 84% 79% 75%

White 86% 80% 81%




Students without an

IEP

90% 86% 86%





All 68% 72% 60%

White 66% 75% 68%


Hispanic 75% 100% 100%


Students without an

IEP

74% 80% 72%



Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP) Spring Reading ResultsGrade Level KCSD Average RIT/Grade Level Grade Level Norm

K 157 158.1

1 176 177.5

2 191 188.7

3 198 198.6

4 207 205.9

5 212 211.8

6 215 215.8

7 216 218.2

8 221 220.1

9 221 221.9

10 226 221.2

11 226 222.3

Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP) Spring Math ResultsGrade Level KCSD Average RIT/Grade Level Spring Grade Level Norm

K 155 159.1

1 178 180.8

2 197 192.1

3 202 203.4

4 211 213.5

5 219 221.4

6 221 225.3

7 226 228.6

8 228 230.9

9 233 233.4

10 239 232.4

11 239 235

Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP) Spring Science ResultsGrade Level KCSD Average RIT/Grade Level Grade Level Norm

K

1

2

3

4

5

6 208 208.6

7 N/A 210.9

8 215 213.5

9 216 N/A

10 218 N/A

11 221 N/A

2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (FAST Assessment)

Grade % Students At/Above

Benchmark (Fall)

% Students At/Above

Benchmark (Winter)

% Students At/Above

Benchmark (Spring)

All 45% 62% 56%

K 47% 83% 54%

1 34% 51% 54%

2 50% 55% 51%

3 49% 61% 63%

2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (Fall % Students At/Above Benchmark)

2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (Winter % Students At/Above Benchmark)

2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (Spring % Students At/Above Benchmark)

2015-2016 KCSD Bullying/Harassment Referral DataBuilding Hawthorne

Elementary

School

George

Washington

Elementary

School

Keokuk Middle

School

Keokuk High

School

Bullying Majors

and Minors

21 18 3 2

Harassment

Majors and

Minors

50 2 13 1

37

GoalsReview of 2015 - 2016 Goals

Set 2016 – 2017 Goals

2015-2016Keokuk CSD APR Goals

*SIAC Goals measuredby Iowa Assessment

2016-2017Keokuk CSD APR Goals to be Set

*Results from 2015-2016 as measured by Iowa Assessments

Grade Reading Math ScienceBullying and

Harassment

2nd (51%) – FAST

(70%) – IA

(56%) - IA (53%) - IA

3rd (63%) – FAST

(68%) – IA

(75%) - IA (77%) - IA

4th (71%) (*78%)

(GOAL = 85%)

(81%)

8th (*74%)

(GOAL = 80%)

(75%) (73%)

11th (68%) (72%) (*60%)

(GOAL = 80%)

PreK - 12 (1 found incident)

40

Proposal for 2016-2017Building Level SIAC Committees

2015-2016Long-Term KCSD District Goals

1. We will increase the number of students who show a year’s plus growth on district assessments by improving teaching and learning practices.

(Need to set a baseline)

2. We will improve the culture and climate in the district through the use of Positive Behavior and Intervention and Supports (PBIS).

(Need to identify measures)

3. We will begin to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum, and continueto improve quality instructional strategies through the use of variousresources including technology.

(Curriculum needs to be aligned with the Iowa CORE.)

41

2016-2017Keokuk CSD APR Proposed Goals

*Results from 2015-2016 as measured by Iowa Assessments

Grade Reading Math ScienceBullying and

Harassment

2nd (Fast = 51%)

State Avg. = 70%

NG = 56%

3rd (Fast = 63%)

State Avg. = 68%

NG = 68%

4th 3rd = 74.1%

NG = 80%

8th 7th = 74.8%

NG = 80%

11th 10th = 71.5%

NG = 80%

PreK - 12 KCSD will continue

to improvement of

defining

A systemic look at our goals at all levels

District Goals

Building Goals

PLC Team, Individual Student,

& Individual Professional Development Goals and Monitoring

43

2016-2017Proposed SIAC Structure

• SIAC Committees at the building level for each building with a representative to the District SIAC committee.

• Building level monitoring of formative data specific to their level.

• Building level ownership of the results by school level SIAC committee.

• Greater involvement in the process:• Staff• Students• Parents• Community

• Additional Thoughts…

Thank you for your time and input this evening!

45

keokuk community report · comprehensive assessment • in a secure and nurturing environment that...

Documents