- 1 -

- 2 -

( , )

1. ,

, , (), . , , () , , , , , , . 21 , , 1) , , .

. ( , , ) ( ) . . 6-3-3 , 9-3 , 6-6 , . , . (digital native) , . () , . , , .

1) 2020 2 73 . 2060 (singularity) () .

- 3 -

. , .

, , . , , , .

2. (2010) ,

, , , , , . . (, , , ) . , , , .

. , . B. Bloom , . . . ,

- 4 -

. , . , , , , , . . , .

, , , , () () . , . (, ) , , . .

. , . . , , . (Board of Education, 2005) . . , . , , (all or nothing) .

, . , ( ), .

- 5 -

. .

3 . , , . , (, skills) , . , , . . , , . . (serendipity) . . .

, , . 5 , , 2, 3 , . 2009 .

(platform) . (, , , , ) , ( ) . . . .

- 6 -

. , .2) , . , (rhetoric) (slogan) .

, . . () . . (appropriate technology) , (appropriate education) , , , . . . -- . ., ., .

. ,

2) . . , . . . . . , . () . , .

- 7 -

. , , . , . . , , , , . . .

3. . , , , ,

IT . , , , IT . , , , . . .

, , (home sapiens sapiens) (home machine) . 2020 2 73 . 2060 (singularity) , , , , . ( ) . . .

.

- 8 -

? ? (human) , , . (Acorn School) 10 . . (digital native) , . SW .

(browsing the net), (learning objects), (simulations) , (online course credits), , OCW . 3, . (dual-coding theory) 3) (logogens) (imagens) . (stimulus on) (imagined stimulus) .

. . . MP3 .4) .

3) Mayer, Richard E.; Sims, Valerie K.(1994), For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 86(3), 389-401. [Abstract] In 2 experiments, high- and low-spatial ability students viewed a computer-generated animation and listened simultaneously (concurrent group) or successively (successive group) to a narration that explained the workings either of a bicycle tire pump (Exp 1) or of the human respiratory system (Exp 2). The concurrent group generated more creative solutions to subsequent transfer problems than did the successive group; this contiguity effect was strong for high- but not for low-spatial ability students. Consistent with a dual-coding theory, spatial ability allows high-spatial learners to devote more cognitive resources to building referential connections between visual and verbal representations of the presented material, whereas low-spatial ability learners must devote more cognitive resources to building representation connections between visually presented material and its visual representation.

4) () . .

- 9 -

.

. (, , , ) . . .

, (Luddite Movement) . , . , 5) . . .

(KERIS) SMART (Technology embedded), (Resource enriched), (Adaptive), (Motivated),

5) 82% 30% . , . , . . . , () . 10% . . 100 95, 90, 105, 110 . , .

. . . . , , . , . . . . . , . () . , .

- 10 -

(Self-directed) , .

(2011.10.13 ) . , (11. 6. 29, ) . , , 21 .

- 11 -

- 12 , 13

- 15 ,

- IPTV,

- 15 30%

-

11 500 15,000 12 1,100 33,000

- : 4 (12) (15)

- 12

- : 15 20,000

- : 50(12)80(13)100(14)

- , ,

- , (12)

- : 2,880(12) 5,760(13) 11,200(15)

- ISP (12) (13)

- : 30%(13) 60%(14) 90%(15)

7 28 . (12) , .

4. , , ,

,

- 12 -

, . , ,6) ( ), , , ( ), , 3Rs , , , .

, ? .

. , . , . .

. . , 2 3 . - , . . .

6) , , . () , , ! . , () , , , , (, ) . .

- 13 -

, TV, , . , . . .

. (edutopia). (now and here) . . (edutopia dilemma/paradox) . .

() . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , .

, ?

. .

- 14 -

. SW . . SW (prosumer) .

, , . SW . () . . (, ), , EXCEL, , SNS(, , ), SPSS/SAS , CAD, Matlab/Mathematica, (C, Python, Perl, Java, scratch ), , (, ), , , Algorithm, (NXT, ) . . ( ) (breakthrough) . . , . 7) . , , .8)

7) . (common sense).

8) , , , ( ) , , SW . , . .

- 15 -

, ? .

. (, , ) . 2011 10 . . , . . . 2 3 4 . . , . , , , .

, , ( , ) , , , . . . , .

, ?

. . , e () .

- 16 -

. . . . , , , . , , , , . . , , , , , , . , , . ! 8 , 10 [] ? . , . , , . .

, ,

- 17 -

- (bodily-kinesthetic) (spatial) (naturalist) (musical) (linguistic) - (logical-mathematical) (intrapersonal - ) / (spirtuality/existential) (interpersonal)

() , , . , , , , , , , . , , , . () . , , , ( , , , , ) , , , . , . .

.

- 18 -

, , , , . , . (, ) . , , (simulation), , , , , (, 2000). , , . .

, , , ?

hypertext, hyperlink , , . . , . hypertext , () , () . , . , . , . , . , , , , . () , , , () . .

- 19 -

. . .

. .

- (browsing).- .- .- , Why .-

.- .- .

, , , . (), , ( , ), . (Marzano & Heflebower, 2011; ).

, 3Rs ? .

, , , . . . .

- 20 -

.

. . , , , . . . . , . CBT , .

, , , , , , , .

, , (incubation) . , . . . - , . ? ? ? , .

, ?

. , . . . J. S. Bruner

- 21 -

(enactive) (iconic) , (symbolic) .

(visualization) . Dual-coding system . , , , , , , , . , , , .

, . . . , . , ( , ) . , . . 2 3 .

. , , . , , . . , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , 9). ,

9) , (, ), (

- 22 -

. .

. . 3D . difficult easy, dirty clean, dangerous safe .

, ? ?

. . . .

. . , , . . , , .

, ?

).

- 23 -

. . . EBS, . 2 3 , . . , .

. . , , . , , , , , , . . . , , . .

5. , () , ,

, . , . , , , .

- 24 -

, , (vision) .

. , , ( ) . . . , , , , . , , , .

, (reduction) . . ( ) ( ) . . , , , , .

(2007.3.15), .______________(2011.10.13), ., (2010), 2010 . (2004), " ",

., , (2011), 2010 ,

.(2006), u-Learning ,

24.(2010), , SNU Press.

- 25 -

, , (2010), , .

(2005), 2005 , . (2008), , . (2010), , .(2010), , 51.(2000), , , 10, , 6-11. (1997), " ", . (2004), " ", .(2000), ; 21(2000 10). 61-67. (2011), , .(2011), . PPT . (2000), 21 . ., , , , , , (2011), 2.0

() , . , (2010), ,

.(2011), ,

, 51 . (1999), . : .(2010), , ., , , (2006), , ()

.(2006), . : () . (2000), ,

().______(2011a), . : .______(2011b), ,

(10 21, )., (2011), :

, () .Bellanca, James & Brandt, Ron(Eds.)(2010), 21st Century Skills: Rethinking how

students learn, Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. , 21 (1), .

Bobbitt, F.(1918), The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

- 26 -

Brown, John Seely(Mar./Apr. 2000). Growing up digital: how the Web changes work, education, and the ways people learn, Change, 32(2), 10-20.

Comenius, J.A.(1658), Orbis Sensualium Pictus. (1997). . : .

Eisner, E. W.(1985), The educational imagination(2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Francek, Mark A.(Mar. 2000), The Web as instructional tool: advantages and

disadvantages. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(6), 10-13.Goldstein, E. B.(2010), Cognitive Psychology: Connecting mind, research, and

everyday experiences(3rd ed.), Kindle Edition. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918), The project method. Teachers College Record, 19

(September), 319-335.Marzano, Robert J. & Heflebower, Tammy(2011), Teaching and Assessing 21st

Century Skills: The classroom strategies series, Marzano Research Laboratory. , 21 (1), .

Palloff, R.M. & Pratt, K. (2000), Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. (2000), . : .

Rushkoff, D.(1996), Playing the Future. , . : .