kerry park house

7/30/2019 Kerry Park House

1/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Kerry Park HouCarbon Neutral HomeSeattle, WA


2/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Interio

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Our site is located at 303 W.

directly adjacent to Kerry Park

and historic Queen Anne Nei

Seattle. This affords the site a

view of the city skyline and the

Sound. Additionally, the site e

southern exposure on the top o

tallest hills, making it an excellen

solar energy production.


3/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Floorplans First and Second

Porch

Roof TerraceRoof Terrace

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Second Floor Plan

First Floor Plan

KitchenLaundryBathroom

Bedroom Bedroom

Dining Room

Living Room

EntryStair

Porch

Master Bedroom

MasterBath

ClosetStair

The house is sited to take maxim

of views south of the Puget S

Seattle skyline. The entire so

composed of sliding glass panels

daylighting potential and the spe

A porch runs along the entire s

both floors, creating a generous

space and providing solar shadin

spaces. A movable solar shadin

the porch allows for reconfigurat

views as necessary. Every room

positioned to have southern v

second floor master bathroom.


4/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Roof and Basement Floo

Roof Plan

Basement Floorplan

Boiler and Pellet Storage

Covered Patio

Storage

Garage Driveway

PV Array and Flat Panel

Collectors

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Stair

The master bedroom opens ont

decks on the east and west side

taking advantage of views of Ker

Seattle skyline. The roof over th

became an ideal site for the hom

and flat panel solar array. The bincludes a covered patio un

cantilevered main volume of the


5/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Climat

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Our site is located in Seattle,

the Pacific Northwest Region

States. Seattle is located in

Marine West Coast climate that i

by warm (but not hot) summers

not cold) winters. As the climatby the temperature of the ocea

experiences relatively mild seas

heating is typically the larges

cool temperatures and increase

and dampness in the winter m

winter months the temperature t

between 2 and 8 degrees Celsius

the temperature typically range

degrees Celsius. Days tend to be

humid or hot and dry.


6/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Passive Stra

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Multiple variables were conside

in the design of our final build

Using the DesignBuilder softwar

of roof type, glazing type, wind

and wall type were all varied and

effect on total site energy (in kBdifferent component is illustrate

to the left. The components r

lowest total site energy values f

different variables were chosen

into the final building envelope d

Lightweight

Superinsulated

Curtain Wall-

Metal R-10 Wall

Panel, Insulation

Board, Gyp

Board

Stud Wall-Metal

Wall Panel,

Sheathing, R-11

Batt Insulation,

Gyp Board

Curtain Wall-

Spandrel Glass,

R-10 Insulation

Board, Gyp

Board

Series1 12.8 13.1 13.13 13.48

12.4

12.6

12.8

13

13.2

13.4

13.6

TotalSite

Energy(kBTU/ft2)

Wall Type Analysis

Heavyweight

Insulated Concrete

Roof

Best Practice Flat

Roof, Heavyweight

ASHRAE Handbook

Roof 9: Metal Deck

Roof

Series1 16.75 32.94 16.74

0

5

10

15

20

2530

35

TotalSite

Energy(kBTU/ft2)

Roof Type Analysis

40% Window Wall

Ratio

30% Window Wall

Ratio

20% Window Wall

Ratio

Series1 33.47 32.94 16.25

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

TotalSite

Energy(kBTU/ft2)

Window Wall Ratio Analysis

Triple Glazed

13 mm Low E

Windows w/

Argon

Triple Glazed

6 mm Low E

Windows w/

Air

Double

Glazed 6/13

mm Low E

Windows w/

Argon

Sgl LoE

(e2=.2) Clr

6mm

Project

External

Glazing

Series1 13.71 17.18 22.72 24.75 32.94

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

TotalSite

Energy(kBTU/ft2)

Glazing Type Analysis


7/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Building D

Vacuum insulated panels

Steel frame

Temperature resistantplastic brackets

Fasteners

Standing-seam zinc panel

Gypsum wall board

Typical wall section

1= 4

Window detail

1= 4

Roof corner detail

1= 4

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Our building utilizes a light

insulated building envelope com

structural insulated panels sheat

metal cladding. This envelope

a light and thin appearance wit

tightness and heat retention ovbatt insulation. The panels a

top of each other to prevent t

thermal bridges from the exterio

reducing heating demand and o

energy cost.


8/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Window openings in the hou

strategically placed facing c

window openings on the opposi

allows air from the outside to na

the space, facilitating fresh air in

cooling properties. The mild cliallows the cross ventilation ac

window placement to act as the p

system within the structure

reducing site energy demand, wh

temperature and humidity lev

range of the occupants comf

is then coupled with a mov

system on the south-facing facad

occupant to further customize

well as the sunlight entering the

Natural Vent

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Second Floor Natural Ventilation Diagram

First Floor Natural Ventilation Diagram Moveable Shading System


9/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Our buildings energy concept

several important systems in o

our buildings heating and energ

heating, our building utilizes a b

the boiler is both up to 96% effic

entirely by renewable and lo

wood pellets. To further redu

load, or building makes use of a

unit as well. Additionally, our b

a flat plate collector solar water h

This system allows most of our b

heating energy to be provided b

energy from the biomass boil

backup system. Additionally,

electrical power is provided by a

of solar panels on the second floo

Energy CoEnergy Conversion Building Systems Energy Use

Photovoltaic

Roof Panels

Biomass Boiler

Solar Hot Water Heater Air Handling Unit

Supply Air

Return Air

Flat Plate

Solar Collector

Heat Recovery Unit

Electrical Power

Boiler Pellet

Feed


10/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Several systems were considere

heating demand for this building

system had its own particular a

installation of a biomass boiler

decided to be the best option.

the small amount of CO2 produceboiler, our sites proximity to tim

made the resupply of the boiler

much more convenient to manag

the large amount of storage s

on our lower level provided the

site storage for the systems woo

numerical calculations that led to

the left can be viewed on the nex

Active Sy

0 0 0 0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Systems for heating

Electric resistance heating

Furnace

Condensing Boiler

Biomass Boiler

Heat Pump (External Air)

Heat Pump (geothermal)

CHP

Operation cost[$/ft2 year]

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Systems for heating


Furnace

Condensing Boiler

Biomass Boiler



CHP

spec. CO2 emission [kg CO2/ft2 year]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Systems for heating


Furnace

Condensing Boiler

Biomass Boiler



CHP

spec. CO2 emission reduction [kg CO2/ft2 year]

Guntamatic Biostar 12W Biomass Boiler Diagram


11/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Active Sy

Energy Conversion Heating and Cooling

Systems for heating Use Energy Deman COP/Efficiency Secondary Energy

[kWh/ ft2 Year] [kWh/ ft2 Year]

Electric resistance heating 3.75 1 3.75

Furnace 3.75 0.85 4.41

Condensing Boiler 3.75 0.95 3.95

Biomass Boiler 3.75 0.8 4.69

Heat Pump (External Air) 3.75 2.1 1.79

Heat Pump (geothermal) 3.75 3.4 1.10

CHP 3.75 0.7 5.36

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. .

.

.

Cost Operation Cost Primary Energy Factor spec. CO2 em.

[$/kWh] [$/ft2 year] [-] [kg CO2 / kWh prim]

0.18 0.68 3.34 12.53 0.62

0.12 0.53 1.05 4.63 0.23

0.12 0.47 1.05 4.15 0.23

0.11 0.52 1 4.69 0.05

0.18 0.32 3.34 5.97 0.62

0.18 0.20 3.34 3.68 0.62

0.12 0.64 1.05 5.63 0.27

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . .

. . .

Cost

Systems for heating

Electric resistance heating 0.68

Furnace 0.53

Condensing Boiler 0.47

Biomass Boiler 0.52

Heat Pump (External Air) 0.32

Heat Pump (geothermal) 0.20

CHP 0.64

ll .

ll .

ll l .

ll l .

ll .

l .

Systems for heating

Electric resistance heating 7.77

Furnace 1.07

Condensing Boiler 0.95

Biomass Boiler 0.23

Heat Pump (External Air) 3.70

Heat Pump (geothermal) 2.28

CHP 1.52

ll .

ll .

ll l .

ll l .

ll .

l .

specific CO2 emission Electricity Saved CO2 emission

[kg CO2 / ft2 year] [kWh/ft2 year][kg CO2 / ft2 year]

7.77 1.13 2.33

1.07 1.13 0.27

0.95 1.13 0.27

0.23 1.13 0.06

3.70 1.13 2.33

2.28 1.13 2.33

1.52 1.13 2.33

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

l . .

. . .

l . . .l . . .

l . . .

l . . .

. . .

ll . . .

ll . . .

ll l . . .

ll l . . .

ll . . .

l . .

Systems for heating Chose system


Furnace

Condensing Boiler

Biomass Boiler x .



CHP

.

ll

ll

ll l

ll l

ll

l


12/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Supply Air Ducts

Return Air Ducts

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

HVAC System Dia

Second Floor Ventilation Diagram

First Floor Ventilation Diagram

Basement Boiler Location

A pellet boiler system was ch

generation. Due to the relative

temperatures in Seattle, as well a

positioning to take advantag

from the Puget Sound, no coo

necessary. Air ducts are mostly cthe homes circulation spaces.

also ties into the homes air exc

which was necessary due to the

vacuum insulated wall system.


13/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

Mechanical Ventilation SyCalculation of energy demand for ventilation air speed in[ft/min]

500

Fitting x No. of fitting type air speed in

[ft/min]

90 bend,sharp 1.3 1 500

T, flow to branch 0.3 2 500

Flow from duct to room 1 4 500

500

500

500

500

Channel section volume flowlength of channelength of channela ir speed in c

[ft3/h] [ft] [m] [ft/min]

1 1400 31 9.424 500

2 1400 30 9.12 500

3 1400 27 8.208 500

4 0 500

5 0 500

6 0 500

1400

volume flow

[ft3/h] [m3/h]

Total volume flow 1400 39.2

Ventilator efficiency 75

Power fan 0.3012295 W/m3

Operation hours 8760

Energy demand fan 103439.8

channel

channel density DPfan[m/s]

2.54 1.23 0.716396417

2.54 1.23 0.3306445

2.54 1.23 0

2.54 1.23 0

2.54 1.23 0

2.54 1.23 0

2.54 1.23 0

0 1.23 0

hannel Channel area Channel diameter friction coeffi DPfan

[m/s] [m2] [ft2] [m] [ft]

2 .54 0.00428696 0.04608486 0.07389926 0.23278267 0.015 7.589776533

2.54 0.00428696 0.04608486 0.07389926 0.23278267 0.015 7.344945032

2.54 0.00428696 0.04608486 0.07389926 0.23278267 0.015 6.610450529

2.54 0 0 0 0 0.015

2.54 0 0 0 0 0.015

0.22592213

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

1

kWh/year

Energy demand fan


14/14

Fall2012

ARCH5

05

Kerr

Final Project

12.14.2012

Prof. Lars Junghans

Matt Gilbert

Bryan Pansing

The use of an tight building env

with efficient low CO2 producin

resulted in a building which pro

energy than it needs to operate

a highly efficient boiler couple

recovery unit, and the absence o

cooling due to the natural ventilby the buildings design, result

with a very low specific energy d

Active SySpecific Energy demandHeating 12.8 [kBTU/ ft

2 Year]

Cooling 0 [kBTU/ ft2 Year]

l

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1

Artificial Lighting

Ventilation

Warm Water

HeatingCooling

l

$/ft2 year

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

l

l

l

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

1

Artificial Lighting

Ventilation

Warm Water

HeatingCooling

kg CO2/ft2 year

Final result CO2 emission

kg CO2/ft2

year kg CO2/ft2

year

Heating 0.23 0

Cooling #DIV/0! 0

Warm Water Heating 0.29 0

Ventilation 0.62 0

Artificial Lighting 1.05 0

CO2 reduction CHP 0 0.05626047

Photovoltaics 0 5.16512033

Wind power generatio 0 0

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

1 2

Wind power

generation

Photovoltaics

CO2 reduction CHP

Artificial Lighting

Ventilation

Warm Water Heating

kg CO2/ft2 year

Photovoltaics

Area of array 300 [ft2]

No of PV standard array 1 [-]

Fraction caused by orientation 1 [%]

Efficiency of PV 12 [%]

Tilt Angle

0

30 x

45

60

90

Gross floor area building 2058.23 ft2

Electri c energy harvesti ng 2.49426325 kWh/ft2

Primary energy Factor 3.34

CO2 emission electricity 0.62

reduced CO2 emission 5.1651203 CO2/ft2

i

l il i

l i i

i

i i l i i

i i

i

li

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Heating Cooling

kBTU/ft2 year

kerry park house

Documents