key driving forces in health informatics w. ed hammond. ph.d., facmi, faimbe, fimia, fhl7 director,...

40
Key Driving Forces in Health Informatics W. Ed Hammond. Ph.D., FACMI, FAIMBE, FIMIA, FHL7 Director, Duke Center for Health Informatics Director, Applied Informatics Research, DHTS Associate Director, Biomedical Informatics Core, DTMI Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine Professor Emeritus, Department of Biomedical Engineering Adjunct Professor, Fuqua School of Business Duke University Chair Emeritus and Secretary, HL7

Upload: hannah-summers

Post on 22-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Key Driving Forces in Health Informatics

W. Ed Hammond. Ph.D., FACMI, FAIMBE, FIMIA, FHL7Director, Duke Center for Health Informatics

Director, Applied Informatics Research, DHTSAssociate Director, Biomedical Informatics Core, DTMI

Professor, Department of Community and Family MedicineProfessor Emeritus, Department of Biomedical Engineering

Adjunct Professor, Fuqua School of BusinessDuke University

Chair Emeritus and Secretary, HL7

Information is what our world runs on. Man has evolved from the food-gatherer to the information gatherer. Information pervades science from top to bottom, transforming every branch of knowledge.

Marshall McLuhan, 1967

Our age is the Information Age – younger than some of us. Claude Shannon created that age in 1948 when he made information a science; he gave it a definition; he gave it units of measurement – the bit. Shannon estimated the digital information in a text, a photograph, a record, and even in the Library of Congress.

What are the Driving Forces?

• Meaningful Use• Big Data• Health Analytics• Learning Health System• Genomics• Translational Medicine• Interoperability• Shared Data

Health Analytics

Learning Health System

EHR

Clinical Trials

Genomic

Biomarkers

Clinical

GIS

Environmental

Images

Shared Data

Big Data

Interoperability

Meaningful Use

Translational Medicine

Aggregated Patient-centric

Patient Reported Outcomes

Meaningful Use

• In 2008, the National Priorities Partnership, convened by the National Quality Forum (NQF), released a report entitled “National Priorities and Goals” which identified a set of national priorities to help focus performance improvement efforts.

• Among these priorities were patient engagement, reduction of racial disparities, improved safety, increased efficiency, coordination of care, and improved population health.

• These priorities have been used to create the framework for “Meaningful Use” of an electronic health record system

• The ultimate goal of Meaningful Use of an Electronic Health Record is to enable significant and measurable improvements in population health through a transformed health care delivery system

Implementation Incentives

• Entering orders, medications, etc. in CPOE• Maintaining problem lists in ICD9-CM/ICD10-CM or

SNOMED CT® coding• Maintain active medication list and electronic

prescribing• Recording vital signs, smoking status• Receive and display lab results encoded with LOINC

codes• Generate patient lists based on specific conditions

and generate patient reminders

Implementation Incentives

• Provide patients with electronic copy and electronic access to their record and discharge instructions

• Generate a clinical summary for each visit• Exchange clinical data with other providers• Protect the information, encrypt it and record

disclosures

Learning Health System

• Digital health data is essential for a continuous learning health system.

• Necessary to coordinate and monitor patient care, analyze and improve systems of care, conduct research to develop new products and approaches, assess the effectiveness of medical interventions, and advance population health.

• Goal of IOM project is by year 2020, 90% of clinical decisions will be supported by accurate, timely, complete, reliable, trusted, and will reflect the best evidence available,

Big data• EHR growth

– from bytes to kilobytes to megabytes to gigabytes to terabytes to petabytes to exabytes to zettabytes to yettabytes to …

• Less is more• Filters that are purpose and event driven• New methods of presentation• Overload and fatigue• Awareness

10

1950s – 600 Megabytes

11

In the 1950s, insurance companies had the biggest data hoards as they collected and stored data about policy holders. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company was one of the pioneers in digitizing customer information, storing data from two million life-insurance policies on a Univac computing system acquired in 1955.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

1960s – 807 Megabytes

12

In the 1960s, American Airlines developed Sabre, a flight reservation system built around one of the largest IBM computing systems available. Sabre was one of the first on-line computing systems, allowing the airline to keep track of an immense matrix of reservations, flight schedules and seat inventories.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

1970s – 80 Gigabytes

13

FedEx’s Cosmos system, introduced in the q970s , allowed the company to scan and track its huge volume of packages being shipped around the world.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

1980s – 450 Gigabytes

14

In the 1980s, banks were at the forefront of data growth, with ATMs coming into vogue and banks focusing on collecting and analyzing transaction data for all their businesses. An example is CitiCorp’s NAIB.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

1990s – 180 Terabytes

15

Wal-Mart in this decade became the largest American bricks and mortar retail operation, and, it is believed, had the biggest commercial data warehouse in the world. To put this number in perspective, experts have estimated that Amazon.com in the late 1990s had single-digit terabytes of stored data.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

2000s – 25 Petabytes

16

The explosion of the Internet in the ‘90s set the stage for Web-based companies such as Google to emerge in the following decade as the global leaders in big data.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

2010s – 100 Petabytes

17

Is Facebook’s data hoard bigger than Google’s today? Some say yes, some say no. According to Facebook, its user content makes up more than 100 petabytes of stored photos and video. And analyzing that data generates about 500 terabytes of new information every day – more than 2 ½ times the size of a ‘90s Wal-Mart data cache.

Source: Wall Street Journal March 2013

18

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 20200

20,000,000,000,000,000

40,000,000,000,000,000

60,000,000,000,000,000

80,000,000,000,000,000

100,000,000,000,000,000

120,000,000,000,000,000

The Growth of Big Data

Global data is growing at rate of 59% per year

2004 to 2012:BI, Analytics, and Big Data

Business Intelligence

Big Data

Analytics

Google T

rends K S

earch

– Volume – traditional computers with relational data bases are not capable of handling data of significant volume – Exabyte’s 100s of terabytes

– Velocity – data flowing into organizations is coming in very fast, users are demanding live streams of data

– Variety – there are many kinds of data now including photos video, audio, 3d models, simulations, location data

Challenges of Big Data

Topics in Analytics

• Statistical Programming

• Data Mining• Advanced Modeling• Linear Regression• Logistic Regression• ANOVA• Time Series • Forecasting• Survival Analysis

• Text Mining• Financial Analytics • Risk Analytics• Customer Analytics• Fraud Detection• Geospatial Analytics• Linear Programming• Optimization• Data Visualization

Health Intelligence Team: Future Possibilities

• Health system utilization• Algorithms identifying high-risk

patients• Utilizing clinical and non-clinical

data

Predictive Modeling

•Personalized dashboards•Individualized care plans•Mobile health applications

Patient Engagement

•Integrating financial and clinical data•Advanced cost/benefit analyses •Analyzing and refining operations

Optimization

Predictive Modeling Use CasesUse Case Health System

Readmission or death with 29 variables in EHR Center for Clinical Innovation, Parkland Health & Hospital System

30-day readmission risk using hospitalization history

Mount Sinai Medical Center

MRSA in inpatient setting Center for Clinical Research & Informatics, NorthShore University Health System

Undiagnosed hypertension in primary care setting Center for Clinical Research & Informatics, NorthShore University Health System

Pediatric “early warning scores” Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

Classification of Emergent and Non-Emergent ED Use

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School

Geriatric patient fall risk Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig, Germany

Internet-based influenza surveillance system Johns Hopkins, George Washington University

Others in Literature: Length of StayMedication AdherenceNo Show Rates

From molecules to population

Molecular Biology

Clinical Research

Patient Care

Public Health

Population Health

Individual, Family, Community, Societies

Site of Care: Intensive care, inpatient, ambulatory, intensive care,emergency department, long term care, home care

Clinical Specialties

Global

25

Translational Medicine T1 – T4

Genetics

• Gene mutation will identify many treatable genes such as Hirschsprung’s disease, muscular dystrophy, and cystic fibrosis

• Drug treatments are already influenced by genomic information– The anticoagulant drug warfarin has a narrow

therapeutic window - too high a dose, patient can bleed to death; too low a dose, clots remain unclotted. Genetic information [certain versions of two genes CYP2C9 and VKORC1] are highly predictive of rate of metabolizing warfarin.

Clinical Research Informatics• Registries, controlled data exchange among

researchers, provenance, data capture tools such as REDCap, query tools such as i2b2, analytics tools, management of clinical trials

• Patient care – continuing use of patient care data, shared collection of data, cohort identification, discovery of target drug requirements, early translation of research into routine patient care

• Population Health – understanding of prevalence of disease, identification of new drug targets

27

Patient Care Informatics

• Meaningful use of data, EHR systems, data exchange, decision support, supporting safe and high quality health care effectively and efficiently at best cost, interoperability among all sites of care, embracing preventive and personalized care, clinical data warehouses, creation of new knowledge, supporting patient-centric EHRs

• Adverse events fed back to clinical research and ‘omics research

28

Public Health Informatics

• Acquisition of data and structured reports, tracking of disease outbreaks, control of epidemics, insuring appropriate immunization and vaccinations, analytics, infectious disease control, disaster management

• Patient care – source of data from health surveillance and disease management

29

EHR • New types of data

– Genomic– Image– Waveform– Patient-generated– Video– Environmental– Behavioral

• Within the next 5 years, over 50% of the data contained in a patient’s EHR will be non-clinical.

30

Predictions for the next decade• We will discover a genetic linkage to most diseases• Early discovery of disease-causing mutations will

influence care with better outcomes• Cost of DNA sequencing will drop to $500 or less• Children will have their DNA sequenced at birth• Most adults will have their DNA sequenced• Genomic data coupled with personal health data will

have a strong impact on the pharmaceutical industry. Drugs will be more targeted.

• Health care model will change as will the role of the provider

31

Challenges

• Acceptance that cooperation and sharing is a win-win situation

• Single ontology that links all domains; that is an open process; that uses a common process in which expertise is the dominant factor; identifies stewardship of each ontological term

• Ontology removes all ambiguity in associated attributes; ontology matches terms that are used in the process of research and care

32

Challenges

• Solves privacy issues; recognizes that personal control of data may harm creation of new knowledge and seamlessly connecting the contributing domains for the most effective care

• Identification and implementation of standards for data and data exchange

• Controlled and purposeful exchange of data• Quality of data is insured through process,

algorithms, and certainty factor

33

So, what can we do?

• Facilitate appropriate use of technology for health care (Meaningful Use)

• Improve the ability to make appropriate decisions about diagnoses and treatments (MU)

• Improve the knowledge base for health care• Eliminate inefficiencies in the process of

administration and in health care delivery• Create new models for delivery, administration,

and reimbursement of care

34

More of what can we do

• Evaluate the effectiveness of testing and treatment (Comparative Effectiveness Research)

• Improve techniques for the management and use of data (MU)

• Educate people in the need for and use of informatics (HITECH, incentive funding)

• Ethics, privacy, security (HIPAA)

35

What is GIS? A geographic information system (GIS)

integrates hardware, software, and data for capturing, managing, analyzing, and displaying all forms of geographically referenced information.

GIS allows us to view, understand, question, interpret, and visualize data in many ways that reveal relationships, patterns, and trends in the form of maps, reports, and charts.

Ultimately helps answer questions and solve problems by allowing us to look at our data in a way that is quickly understood and easily shared.

Source: Sohayla Pruitt

GIS Core Capabilities: Visualization

Source: Sohayla Pruitt

What I did not talk about

• Mobile devices• Data Elements• Phenotypes• Personalized Medicine• Consumer Engagement• Social Networking• 3D Printing• Virtual Reality

What has technology added?• Moore’s Law – faster, bigger, cheaper computers

and communications than ever• Wireless, global communication that instantly

connects the world• Small, mobile devices that are ubiquitous• More knowledge than we can use• The ability to aggregate all data about a person

from all sources• A rich mixture of media to enhance our

understanding of disease and its cure

Conclusion / Summary

• The pace of technology has been paced by Moore’s law: roughly, computational power doubles approximately every two years

• Use of technology – informatics – has not kept pace. The future of health care depends on our getting ahead of the curve

• That step demands a step change – revolution, not evolution!

40