key success factors in full-service restaurants in finland · the approach of the research is to...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Keysuccessfactorsinfull-servicerestaurantsinFinlandAqualitativestudyonoperationmanagementandstrategy HoaQuynhTran Bachelor’sthesisNovember2015SchoolofBusinessandServiceManagementDegreeProgrammeinInternationalBusiness
![Page 2: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Description
Author(s)Tran,HoaQuynh
TypeofpublicationBachelor’sthesis
Date16.11.2015
Numberofpages62
Languageofpublication:English
Permissionforwebpubli-cation:x
TitleofpublicationKeysuccessfactorsinfull-servicerestaurantsinFinlandAqualitativestudyonoperationmanagementandstrategy
DegreeprogrammeDegreeprogrammeinInternationalBusiness
Supervisor(s)Akpinar,MuratAssignedbyJyväskyläUniversityofAppliedSciences(JAMK)
Description
Theobjectiveofthestudywastofindoutcriticalsuccessfactorsrelatestosuperiorper-formanceinrestaurantbusinesses.Theresearchscopefocusedonfull-servicerestaurantsinFinland.
Theresearchapproachisqualitative.Thetheoreticalpartoftheresearchcoverscriticalsuccessfactor,servicemanagementandrestaurantoperationmanagement.Theempiricalstudyincludesresultsoftwosemi-structuredface-to-faceinterviewsconductedwithres-taurantmanagersduringtheautumn2015.Thepurposeoftheinterviewswastofindouttheirexperienceandinsightrelatedtokeyfactorscontributingtosuccessfulpractice.Theselectionprocesswastakencautiouslytoachievetherepresentativenessofthesample.FigaroRestaurantandVesilinnaRestaurantwerechosenasqualifiedsample.Thedatawascollectedfrominterviewswithtwomanagersoftheserestaurantsandanalyzedbyconstantcomparativemethodusingcodingsystemdevelopedfromtheoreticalframework.
Theresultsoftheinterviewspresentedasetoffactorsthatappearedtosignificantlyinflu-encethebusinessperformanceoftherestaurants.Thefindingsalsorevealedfundamentalelementsofasuccessfulfull-servicerestaurantandtheircauseandeffectrelationwiththefactors.
Themainconclusionoftheresearchisthathighperformanceinfoodqualityrelatescloselytopurchasing,productionandqualitycontrolfunctionswhilehigh-standardservicere-quirespotentialworkforce,customerrelationship,customerknowledge,andproximitytothemarket.Furthermore,adistinguishedstrategyisvitalforthebusinesstoremaincom-petitive.Theresearchislimitedinscopeandlanguageofconduct.Thestudyisusefulforsimilartopicresearchinothercontextsorthedevelopmentofquantitativestudyonthesubject.
Keywords(subjects)Criticalsuccessfactors,full-servicerestaurants,servicemanagement,restaurantmanage-ment,qualitativeresearch,semi-structuredinterviewsMiscellanous
![Page 3: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................3
1.1 Backgroundinformation....................................................................................31.2 Researchobjectives...........................................................................................6
1.2.1 Researchaims....................................................................................................61.2.2 Objectsoftheresearch......................................................................................6
1.3 Researchquestions............................................................................................71.4 Researchapproach............................................................................................71.5 Thesisstructure.................................................................................................7
2 LITERATUREREVIEW.........................................................................................8
2.1 Keysuccessfactors............................................................................................82.1.1 Abusinesscharacteristic....................................................................................92.1.2 Aplanningtool...................................................................................................92.1.3 Amarketdescription..........................................................................................92.1.4 Theresearchview............................................................................................10
2.2 ServiceManagement.......................................................................................122.2.1 BasicConcepts.................................................................................................132.2.2 Keyareas..........................................................................................................16
2.3 RestaurantManagement.................................................................................212.3.1 Externalenvironment......................................................................................212.3.2 Industryenvironment......................................................................................232.3.3 Classification....................................................................................................262.3.4 Internalissues..................................................................................................272.3.5 Mainareas.......................................................................................................282.3.6 TheoreticalFramework....................................................................................34
3 METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................35
3.1 Researchapproach..........................................................................................353.2 Datacollection.................................................................................................363.3 Dataanalysis....................................................................................................383.4 Verificationofresults.......................................................................................39
4 RESULTS..........................................................................................................41
4.1 Strategy...........................................................................................................414.2 Production&Control.......................................................................................424.3 Inventory.........................................................................................................434.4 Menu...............................................................................................................444.5 Staff.................................................................................................................444.6 Marketing........................................................................................................464.7 QualityManagement.......................................................................................484.8 Finance............................................................................................................494.9 Customers.......................................................................................................49
5 DISCUSSION....................................................................................................50
![Page 4: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2
5.1 Answerstotheresearchquestions..................................................................505.2 Managerialimplications...................................................................................525.3 Limitations.......................................................................................................535.4 Futureresearchsuggestions.............................................................................54
REFERENCES..........................................................................................................55
APPENDICES..........................................................................................................60
Appendix1.Listofcodes...........................................................................................60Appendix2.Interviewquestions...............................................................................61
FIGURESFigure1.CostStructureofRestaurantsinFinland....................................................................5
Figure2.TheShared-experiencesViewonKeySuccessFactors.............................................10
Figure3.FrameworkforProducingtheServicePackage.........................................................14
Figure4.ServiceOperations....................................................................................................15
Figure5.ServicesasTheater...................................................................................................20
Figure6.ForcesGoverningCompetitioninanIndustry..........................................................24
Figure7.AClassificationofFoodandBeverageOperations...................................................26
Figure8.TheProduct/ServiceMatrix......................................................................................31
Figure9.TheQualityManagementCycle................................................................................32
Figure10.TheoreticalFrameworkforResearchDesign..........................................................34
![Page 5: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
31 INTRODUCTION
Gastronomyisalwaysanenjoyabletopicinourlives.Thankstothehigherqualityof
life and increase in free time and disposable income, cuisines and the culinary art
have been given more and more attention – leading to a significant growth of
restaurants in both numbers and scale, which has turned it into an important
element in most cities and towns. Throughout the 20th centuries, the restaurant
industry,togetherwiththehotelandtourismsector,hasbecomeoneofthefastest
growing sectors and counted for more than one third of the global services
(International Labour Organization, 2010). Constantly evolving and progressively
complex,restaurantshavenolongerownedtheirpositionpurelybasedonthechefs’
skills.Nowadays,thefirstpriorityofarestaurantmightnotnecessarybethequality
of food any longer. Inmany cases it depends on various other factors in order to
createthesuccessofacateringservice.Whatthesefactorsare,andhowtomakean
effectivecombinationoutofthem,caughtastronginterestintheauthor.Asaresult,
theauthordecidedtoconductastudytounderstandtheseelementsinrestaurants,
andchoosingFinnishrestaurantsastheobjectofresearch.
1.1 Backgroundinformation
AfterbackgroundresearchaboutthecateringindustryinFinland,thefirstimpression
was that Finland lacks a number of general family oriented restaurants, in
comparison to other European countries, due to the Finnish perception of a high
price level of a restaurantmeal (Häkkinen, 2010). There used to be a timewhen
restaurants only existed in large cities, and served upper-class clients (Helsingin
hotelli-jaravintolamuseo,2003).Therestaurantindustrywasonceheavilydamaged
bytheProhibitionofAlcoholicBeveragesperiodandinwartime,afterwhichstarted
with the establishment of the state-owned alcohol company Alko Oy (Hotelli-ja
ravintolamuseo, 2003). From the 1960s, the number of restaurants in Finland
increased substantially and the industry began to gainmore variety in the 1980’s,
sped up by Alko’s more liberal policy and the economic boom of the late 1980’s
(Häkkinen,2010).Therestaurantsector,togetherwithhotels,hasexpandedlargely
in terms of employment, which increased by 35.0% in the 1990s and 9.0% in the
![Page 6: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
42000s according to a MARA report (Matkailu- ja Ravintolapalvelut MaRa, 2013).
ThereisalsoagrowingtrendofeatingoutinFinland,accordingtothesamereport.
Back to present, nevertheless, the figures indicates that this sector has gradually
declined in sales and staff in the last five years (Vihmo, 2014). The economic
recessionhasweakenedtheconsumers’demandandpurchasingpower–resultingin
thedecliningtrendofFinnsdiningoutinrestaurants(Halla,2014).Forthefirsttime
inthe20thcentury,alargenumberofemployeesintherestaurantindustrywereleft
unemployed as the restaurant service were the first to suffer when the economy
weakened (Häkkinen, 2010). In the year 2014, Finland’s restaurant sector almost
doubled the losses compared to 2013, due to the drop in the number of Russian
tourists(Yle,2014).AccordingtothereportofFinnishHospitalityAssociationabout
this sector last year, licensed restaurant sales decreased by three percent (-3.0%),
alongwithadecreaseinrestaurantstaff(-4.4%),whilethefastfoodchainswereina
slightly better situation with a small increase in sale (0.2%) (Vihmo, 2015). Many
small-scalerestaurantsandbarsfacedtheprospectofhavingtoshuttheirdoorsand
collapse(Yle,2014).
Besidestheeconomicdownturnandfallingdemand,anothermajorconstraintothis
sector is taxation, especially the alcohol tax. According to the information from
MARA,inthecoststructureofarestaurantinFinland,taxationcountsfor27.0%,raw
materialcountsfor29.0%,wagesfor25.0%,rentalfor10.0%,andothercosts5.0%.
ThenormalearningfigureEBITDAis5.0%inwhichoperatingprofitcountsfor2.0%.
Thismeansthataonehundredeurosdinneronlygivestwoeurosprofit.(Matkailu-ja
RavintolapalvelutMaRa,2014).
![Page 7: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5
Figure1.CostStructureofRestaurantsinFinland
(Matkailu-jaRavintolapalvelutMaRa,2014)
The government executing an alcohol tax reduction in 2005 made it worse by
creating a huge difference between alcohol drinks in restaurants and stores,
reversely led to the fall in restaurantdemands,andgrow instores’ sale (Pelkonen,
2013). This disadvantage along with high prices of wholesales foods, a limited
transportnetworkandthecurrently lowdemand,hascreatedahighlycompetitive
environmentfortherestaurantindustry(Tegelberg,2015).
In thatcontext, this researchwascarriedout inorder to revealwhatelementsare
vital toa restaurantbusiness–which factorsare theessentials to thesurvivaland
successofrestaurantsinthiscountry.It isalsoanattempttogainmoreknowledge
andunderstandingaboutthissectorinFinland:theoperationinrestaurants,andthe
restaurateurs’strategiesandperceptions.
![Page 8: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
61.2 Researchobjectives
1.2.1 Researchaims
Theresearchisbasedonthehypothesisthattherearecertainkeysuccessfactorsin
restaurant business. Thus, the objective of the research is to explore hypotheses
about these factors, which contribute largely to superior business performance in
restaurants. In short, the research aims at identifying some factors that play vital
rolestothesuccessofrestaurantsinFinland.
1.2.2 Objectsoftheresearch
The restaurant industrybasically consistsof fourmajor segments;according to the
level of service customers receive: full service, quick service, eating and drinking
place, and retail host. The full service segment is defined as “made up of dining
locationsthatdonotrequirecustomerstoprepareorservetheirownmeals”;usually
offering menu selections and the price can vary between moderate and greatly
expensive (Akers, NA). Quick service restaurants are “fast-food chains and casual
restaurants thatofferbuffets and take-out service”,whichemphaseson in-minute
preparation and serving time, and “relatively inexpensive” (Akers, NA). Eating and
drinkingplacesegmentincludes“caterersandrefreshmentstandvendor”,andretail
host can be restaurants that “located within gas stations and grocery stores” for
example,mostlythe“franchisesofmajorbrand,suchasspecialtycoffeeorfast-food
chains”(Akers,NA).
Thisresearchfocusesonfull-servicerestaurants.ThiscanincludefromCasualDining
toFineDiningrestaurants.CasualDiningrestaurantsaredefinedas“appealingtoa
wideaudience,provideavarietyoffooditems,fromappetizersandsaladstomain
dishesanddesserts,”and“offeringcomfortableatmosphereswithmid-rangeprices”
(Jacquelyn, 2001). Fine Dining restaurants are defined as “full service restaurants
with upscale menu and extensive beverage offerings”, with “more sophisticated
décor and ambiance, thewait staff is usually highly trained… and there is often a
dresscodeforpatrons”(TrendsinFineDining,2011,p.102).
![Page 9: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
71.3 Researchquestions
Basedon theproblemdescribed, the research aims to answer thequestion:What
arethecriticalsuccessfactorstofull-servicerestaurantsinFinland?Thisquestionis
closelyrelatedtotheconceptofCriticalSuccessFactors(CSF),whichwillbedefined
thoroughlyinthenextchapter.
1.4 Researchapproach
Theapproachoftheresearchistoidentifykeysuccessfactorsfrombothperceived
and actual views, and on that basis explore some hypotheses about the business
characteristics that have resulted in high business performance. The actual key
success factorswere collected from theories and literature review as a source for
hypotheses.Theperceivedkeysuccessfactorswereidentifiedfromtheviewpointof
restaurant managers. This is a qualitative task, which was achieved through
interviewsthatinvestigatedthemanagers’perceivedcausesoftheirperceivedhigh
performance. The perceived factors were then specified as concepts, and being
linkedwiththetheoreticalones inordertocreatesubjectivehypothesesaboutthe
object.
1.5 Thesisstructure
Thethesisconsistsoffivemainparts:Introduction,Literaturereview,Methodology,
ResultsandDiscussion.
The Introduction introduces the topic and my motivation to do the research.
Moreover, it provides some background knowledge about the restaurant industry
contextinFinland–historyandrecentdevelopments,inordertocreateanimageof
the industry in general. Furthermore, it presents the research objective and
questions;thefocusedsegmentoftheresearch,andbriefly introducesthestrategy
forimplementingtheresearch.
TheLiteratureReviewisprovidedinordertocreateatheoreticalframeworkforthe
empirical study. First of all, the concept of Key Success Factors is discussed
thoroughly.Furthermore,thereviewtakesintoconsiderationsomebasicsandmain
areasinoperationunderthescopeofServiceManagement.Thethirdpart isabout
![Page 10: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
8restaurant industry. First of all, it presents the external environment and internal
factorsthathighlyaffecttherestaurantindustryanditsunit.Furthermore,itfocuses
on essential elements in RestaurantManagement. Finally, the reviewpresents the
theoreticalframeworkselectedfortheresearch.
The purpose of theMethodology chapter is to explain the choice ofmethod, the
selectionof sample, researchdesign,datacollectionprocess,and thedataanalysis
process.
TheResults chapter reports the findingsand facts that the research revealed from
interviews. These findings were interpreted and analyzed carefully to identify the
factorsfromperspectivesofrestaurantmanagers.
The last Chapter – Discussion discusses about the findings to answer the research
questions.Moreover,itsummarizestheprogressoftheresearchandevaluatinghow
well the researchachieves its aim. Thepart alsodiscusses limitationsof the thesis
andpossiblefurtherresearch.
2 LITERATUREREVIEW
2.1 Keysuccessfactors
The concept of key success factor, also known as Critical Success Factor has
originated from the field ofManagement Information Systems for the purpose of
designing information systems for top managers (Grunert & Ellegaard, 1992).
According toBullenandRockart,critical success factorsaredefinedas“the limited
number of areas in which satisfactory results will ensure successful competitive
performance for the individual,departmentororganization.Critical success factors
arethefewkeyareaswhere‘thingsmustgoright’forthebusinesstoflourishandfor
themanager’sgoalstobeattained”(Bullen&Rockart,1981).Inshort,thecoreidea
of key success factor is that it is “a statement about casual relationship, namely
betweensuccessandsomecauseofsuccess”(Grunert&Ellegaard,1992,p.5).
This concept was later adapted to the field of business strategy research and
transformedinmanydifferentways,butcanmainlybegroupedintothreeviews:as
abusinesscharacteristic,asaplanningtool,andasamarketdescription(op.cit.p2).
![Page 11: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
92.1.1 Abusinesscharacteristic
Thetheorybehindthispointofviewisthat“everybusinessisuniqueinallaspects”
and thus it has to “find its own unique match with its environment” (Grunert &
Ellegaard, 1992, p. 5). Therefore, it is impossible to generate general conclusions
aboutkeysuccessfactorsinanindustry,orbuildingupaneitherknowledgebasenor
strategyformationforabusinesscommunity.Theonlyformofresearchapplication
forfindingkeysuccessfactorsisthecasestudy,accordingtoMintzberg(Mintzberg,
1990). Thus this concept can only be used for the purpose of training business
executives by looking at many single cases in order to develop a better
understandingandintuitionforbusinessecology.(Grunert&Ellegaard,1992,p.5)
2.1.2 Aplanningtool
In this view, the concept is used for the purpose of developing “planning
instruments” in order to help businesses to find the right strategy (Grunert &
Ellegaard,1992,p.5).Themeaningofthisideaisthattakingkeysuccessfactorsinto
consideration when planning can help businessmen make better decisions and
improvestrategyformation.Itnaturallyforcesthedecision-makerstoemphasizeon
asmallnumberoffactorsandconcentrateontheprocessofreasoning,whichmay
lead to an improvement in strategy formulating, problem solving and decision-
making skills. Similarly to the aim of using key success factor as a business
characteristic,thismethodputstheemphasisontrainingandimprovingtheskillsof
decision-makers, and furthermore possibly generate a knowledge base about the
process of decision-making: how perceived success factors influence and shape
strategyformation.(Op.cit.p5-6)
2.1.3 Amarketdescription
The last viewofkey success factors, called the shared-experiencesview, compares
perceived success factors to actual success factors. The theory behind this view is
thatifexperienceofbusinessstrategiesissharedandstudied,itbecomespossibleto
build up general and empirically based theoretical knowledge about different
![Page 12: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
10strategytypeslinkedtobusinesssuccess,whichcanguidetheselectionofabusiness
strategy.(Grunert&Ellegaard,1992,pp.6-7)
Figure2.TheShared-experiencesViewonKeySuccessFactors
(SousadeVasconcelloseSá&Hambrick,1989)
This viewpoint assumes thatbusiness successexists as anobjective truth,which is
governedbycasualrelationships,whichcanbeuncoveredthroughresearch.Theaim
ofthisviewistocreateaknowledgebaseoftheactualsuccessfactorsinthemarket.
This aimappears to behighly ambitious as it encounters enormousobstacles. The
firstchallenge is thatsuccessand factors leading to itareoftendifficult to identify
and linktoeachother. Inaddition, thereliabilityandvalidityof themeasurements
can hardly be evaluated. Another serious problem lies in the nature that success
factors are transient and constantly change. Moreover, once success factors are
recognized by actors in a market, everybody will invest in the same skills and
resources,whichcanresultinchangesofthefactors.(Op.cit.p6-7.)
2.1.4 Theresearchview
This research takes the foundation on the last view,mentioned above as shared-
experiencesview–consideringkeysuccessfactorsasamarketdescriptionthatcan
be investigated objectively. This view often results in a research agenda including
twotasks: firsttocollectasourceofhypothesesonkeysuccessfactors;thenusing
research methodology for testing theses hypotheses (Grunert & Ellegaard, 1992).
![Page 13: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
11Thisresearchisconductedinordertocompletethefirsttaskoftheagenda.Itdoes
notaimattestinganyhypotheses,whichwouldrequirequantitativemethodology.
Forthistask,theresearchadoptedthedefinitionofkeysuccessfactorsfromGrunert
&Ellegaard,whichisstatedasthefollowing:
“Akeysuccessfactorisaskillorresourcethatabusinesscaninvestin,which,onthe
market the business is operating on, explains a major part of the observable
differencesinperceivedvalueand/orrelativecosts.”
(Grunert&Ellegaard,1992,p.17)
Inordertounderstandthisdefinition,firstistoexaminetheconceptof“differences
in perceived value and/or relative costs” in regard to successful business
performance. Several writers have argued that the causes of differences in
performance can be reduced to two basic factors: “the value which customers
perceive in the products/services offered, and the costs incurred in creating this
perceivedvalue”(Day&Wensley,1988)(Petersen,1991)(Porter,1980).
At this point it is important to look at the concept of competitive advantage.
According to Porter, a firm gains its competitive over its competitors either by
providingcomparablevaluetobuyerswith lowercost,orbyofferinggreaterbuyer
valuewithapremiumprice(Porter,TheCompettiveAdvantageofNations,1998).In
short,businessesthatofferhigherperceivedvalueorlowerrelativecoststhantheir
rivalsaresaidtohaveacompetitiveadvantageinthatmarket(Grunert&Ellegaard,
1992).
Alsoinhisbook“Competitiveadvantagesofnations”(1998),Porterhasarguedthat
thoughnotimpossible,itisdifficultnottomakeatrade-offbetweenlower-costand
differentiated relative to competitors, because “providing unique performance
serviceisinherentlymorecostly”(Porter,1998).
Nevertheless, Kim and Mauborgne later developed the theory of “Blue and Red
Ocean”inwhichtheyintroducedastrategycalledBlueOcean,whichcan“breakthe
valueandcosttrade-offbycreateuncontestedmarketspaceandmakecompetition
irrelevant”(Kim&Mauborgne,2009).
Hence, it canbeargued thatvalueandcostscanbebothpositivelyandnegatively
related,whichcanaffectprofitsorotherperformancemeasuresinvariousway(for
![Page 14: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
12instance in termsofmarketshare),andthesetwodimensionshavetobeassessed
simultaneouslytomeasurebusinessperformancefromtheviewpointofcompetitive
advantage(Grunert&Ellegaard,1992,p.11).
The next part discussed the concept of key success factors in terms of skills and
resources. According to the authors of the definition, key success factors can be
distinguished based on two dimensions: whether they are conjunctive or
compensatory;andtheirchangeability.(Op.cit.p.14.)
Conjunctive key success factors refer to necessary skills and resources for superior
performanceinamarket.Thedegreeofacquiringtheseskillsandresourcesalways
relatestotheperformanceofthebusiness,anda lackoftheseskillsandresources
cannotbecompensatedbythoseinotherareas.(Op.cit.p.14.)
Compensatory key success factors refer to a set of skills and resources that
businesses can choose to emphasize to any extent, and the lower scores on some
factors can be compensated for by higher scores on the other factors. The
compensatory key success factors thus can be the starting point for strategy
formulation.(Op.cit.p.14.)
Changeability refers tohow fast it is for abusiness toattainoneparticular skill or
resource.Thelowerthechangeability,themorepermanentwillbethecompetitive
advantageforthebusinessowners.(Op.cit.p.14.)
This will serve as a framework for this research to categorize and specify the
collectedfactorsfromqualitativemethod.
2.2 ServiceManagement
The business of service has been growing and occupying more and more of the
market under various forms and inmany fields. This partwill review the basics of
servicemanagementanddiscusssomefactorsthatcancontributetothesuccessofa
servicebusiness.
![Page 15: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
132.2.1 BasicConcepts
The first step is to understand the definitions of service and servicemanagement.
Thecommondefinitionofserviceisasfollows:
“A service is intangible, yet provides satisfaction to the customer. It is
performedbypeople,notmanufacturedbymachines.Theservicemayormay
notbetiedtotangiblegoods.”
(Balachandran,2004,p.2)
Service management thus is the management of processes involved in service
activities, includingplanning,organizing,staffingandcontrollingtasks (Appannaiah,
Krishna,Raghavan,&Reddy,2010).
According to Armistead in “Design of Service Operations”, the design of a service
shouldbedecidedbasedonthesebasicquestions:
“(a)Whatisthe‘servicepackage’or‘servicepackages’?
(b)Whoarethecustomersforthe‘servicepackage’?
(c)Whatarethestandardsfor‘servicepackage’?
(d)Howcanthe‘servicepackage’begiventocustomers?”
(Armistead,1985,p.51)
The answers to these questions set up the foundation for four elements that are
criticaltothedesignofaservice:theservicepackage(whetheramixofthephysical
itemsandserviceintangibleorpureserviceandotherfeatures),theservicepackage
standards,theserviceproducingunit,andthedegreetowhichthecustomerneeds
tobeinvolvedintheproductionactivity(Armistead,1985,p.55).
Aframeworkforproducingaservicepackagebasedontheseelementswasbuiltup
bySasser,OlsenandWyckoffasshownbelow:
![Page 16: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
14
Figure3.FrameworkforProducingtheServicePackage
(Sasser,Olsen,&Wyckoff,1978)
The service-producing unit is a distinct element in servicemanagement because it
requires the involvementofcustomers tosomeextent. Itoften falls into twomain
areas: firstly, that part of the service-producing unit which produces the physical
item(e.g. food in restaurants);andsecondly, thatpartwhich involvescontactwith
thecustomer;insomecasesthetwoprocessestendtocoalesce(Armistead,1985,p.
7). This leads to a very important idea of “back room” and “front room” for the
servicebusiness(Levitt,1972).Theideaisdescribedthroughthefollowingdiagram.
![Page 17: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
15
Figure4.ServiceOperations
(Voss,Armistead,Johnston,&Morris,1985)
“Back room” is where the goods aremade (Voss, Armistead, Johnston, &Morris,
1985,p.9).Thispartisisolatedduetothesameadvantageasinthemanufacturing
business:itiseasierto“controltheoperationsinthismorepredictableenvironment
andthatitrestrictsthenumberofcontactpeoplewhoactascontactpersonnel”;and
indeed the operationalmanagement for “back room” activities are very similar to
thosefoundintraditionalmanufacturingoperations(ThompsonJ.,1967).
The “front office”, on the other hand, is where the customer contact takes place
(Voss,Armistead,Johnston,&Morris,1985,p.9).Certainly,thisareaismoredifficult
to control and manage due to the complexity of the interaction process. This
consequentlycreatesachallenge inproducing thispartof theservicepackageata
consistencylevel(op.cit.p9).Inadditiontothedifficultywithcontrollingthequality
oftheserviceencounter,mistakesoccurringareoftenvisibletothecustomers,and
thereisoftenaconflictofcontrolbetweencustomers,thecontactservers,andthe
supervision ormanagement (Bateson, 1984). In general, due to the nature of the
“front office”, in a service organization the more it can increase the back office
contentoftheoperations,thegreaterthedegreeofcontrolithas(op.cit.p10).
Furthermore, from the framework, it can be seen that the satisfaction or
dissatisfactioniscreatedbythedifferencebetweencustomerexpectationbeforethe
service and customer experience when receiving the service. More precisely,
customersatisfactionrepresents“thedifferencebetweenthecustomer’sperception
oftheserviceatthetimeof‘consumption’andthecustomer’spriorexpectationof
whathe/shewouldbe like” (Voss,Armistead, Johnston,&Morris,1985,p.9). The
![Page 18: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
16managementof thewaya customerperceives a serviceexperience thus is vital to
the production of customer satisfaction. This process is done through that “front
office”partoftheproducingservicephase;thusitcanbesaidthattheproductionof
aserviceisalsoapartofthemarketingmix.(Op.cit.p9-12.)
2.2.2 Keyareas
Theauthorsof thebook “Operations Management in Service Industry and the
Public Sector” (1985) have specified several main areas in a service operation:
HumanResourceManagement,CapacityManagement,OperationsControl,Quality
Management, Queuing Systems Design, Material Management, Site location, and
OperationsStrategy(Voss,Armistead,Johnston,&Morris,1985).Inadditiontothese
areas,thispartwillalsobrieflyintroducethetopicofservicemarketing.
HumanResourceManagement
Thehumanresource istheprimecontributortothesuccessofaserviceoperation.
Ontheotherhand,itisalsoamajorcostelementduetothelabor-intensivenature
ofserviceoperations.Inaserviceoperation,inadditiontomanagingtheworkforce,
there is also the task of managing the customers. They are managed as a labor
resourceoraresource,whichhastoflowthroughthesystem;thustheyhavetobe
trainedtobehaveappropriately.Forexample,inasupermarketcustomersselectand
carry the goods to the checkout while in a hospital, patients have to go through
differentdepartments.This isauniqueaspectofhumanresourcesmanagement in
service operations. The behavior of staff/operators and customers varies
dramatically; thus it creates a great challenge in defining standards and ensuring
consistencyofquality.Thetasksinhumanresourcemanagementincludemanpower
and customer planning, design of job, recruitment, selection and termination,
traininganddevelopment,promotion,motivationofworkforce,payment,healthand
safety,andindustrialrelations.(Morris,1985)
CapacityManagement
Thepurposeofcapacitymanagement is“tomatchthe levelofoperationswiththe
level of demand so as to find the best balance between cost and service levels”
(Armistead, 1985, p. 109). This involves two main tasks: considering the factors
relatedtofrommediumtolong-termdemand;anddevelopingstrategiesfortheuse
![Page 19: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
17of resources inorder toaccommodatechanges for short-termdemands.Thereare
twomain strategies: to vary capacity, inwhich “the capacity is changed to follow
changesindemand”;ortomanagedemand,whichmeansto“influencedemandto
minimizetheneedtomakechangesincapacity”(op.cit.p110).Theroleofademand
patternsforecast isveryimportant:themoreaccurateit is,thebettertheplanning
andarrangementofresourcesoftheoperationmeetthedemand(op.cit.p114).
Operationscontrol
Operationscontrolactivitiesareprimarilyconcernedwithensuringthat theservice
packageisdeliveredtothecustomerattherighttimeandintherightplace.There
are two main areas: the receptionist/despatcher role and the production control
role. The receptionist role is associated with contacting and allocating customers,
scheduling,anddispatchingtheservicedeliverysystemtocustomers.Aproduction
control role is responsible foractivitiesat the interfacebetween“frontoffice”and
“backroom”.Thisisthemainlinkbetweenthosehavinghighcontactwithcustomers
in “front office” to those who have little or no contact with customers in “back
room”. This area is very important if the service-producing unit has to deliver the
service package to the customer as andwhen it is required or promised. (Op. cit.
p131-148.)
QualityManagement
Qualitymanagement is concernedwith quality assurance of total service package.
This involves activities and functions including designing, specification, and quality
controllinginordertodelivertheservicepackageinawaythatmeetsthecustomer
expectation (that created by the role of marketing department). Quality
management is associated with factors as organization, people, process, facilities,
and material. A basic quality control system consists of five steps: (a) Define the
stages in the serviceoperation, (b) Specificationof variablesandattributes, (c) Set
limits for the measurements, (d) Measure and assess against standards, and (e)
Providecorrectiveactionifnecessary.(Op.cit.p137-148.)
QueuingSystemsDesignandManagement
Serviceisperishableandcannotbestocked,thusaservicesystemcannotusestocks
in order to response to the variability of demand. Therefore, queuing system
becomesanintegralpartofserviceoperation.Featuresofaqueuingsysteminclude
![Page 20: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
18queuelength,reservationsystems,queuestructureanddesign,andqueuediscipline.
Therearesomefactorsthatthemanagerhastoconsiderwhenplanningthequeuing
systems: reasonablewaiting time for customers, fair inpriority for serving,waiting
conditions, the numbers of serving channels or serving times, different services
pointsbasedoncategoriesofcustomers,anddistractionforwaitingcustomers.(Op.
cit.p217-225.)
MaterialManagement
Material management covers activities that are associated with obtaining and
managing materials. It includes processes of purchasing or buying, stock and
inventory,storescontrollinganddistribution.Thepurposesofmaterialmanagement
are: supplying the service operationwith requiredmaterial, ensuring continuity of
supplybymaintaininggoodrelationshipwithexistingsuppliersanddevelopingnew
ones,andmaintaininginventoriesatlowestcostwhilesustainingthelevelofservice.
It usually consists of two parts: the purchasing process (determining
what/where/whenandhowmuchtobuy);andtheprocessoflookingaftermaterials
(throughstockcontrolsystems,effectivestores,warehousemanagement,materials
handling,anddistribution).(Op.cit.p235-247.)
SiteLocation
Site location is a vital part to service business. Especially in multi-site service
industries, it is important to develop a systematic site selection procedure. This
procedure should identify financial and non-financial criteria for choice. Financial
criteriacanincludebreakevencalculation,discountedcashflowanalysisandpossibly
more sophisticated cash flow analysis. Non-financial criteria can include possible
supply,potentialdemand,competition,flowoftraffic,andlocalregulation.(VossC.,
1985)
OperationsStrategy
Bydefinition,operationsstrategyisasetofplansandpoliciesofanorganizationin
ordertomeetitsobjectives.Itisoftenassociatedwiththeproductlifecircleconcept,
which recently has been applied to service industries, consists of three stages:
entrepreneurial stage,growthstage,andmaturity stage (Sasser,Olsen,&Wyckoff,
1978). A strategy is concerned with the operation structure; the number, size,
locationofunits;therelativesplitbetweenfrontofficeandbackroom,thechoiceof
![Page 21: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
19technology; thedegreeusageof technology;and thedegreeofvertical integration
(Chase,1978).Therearefourmainoperationstrategiesforserviceorganizations:the
strategic locationofunits, the creationof economiesof scale, thedevelopmentof
technologyandservicedifferentiation.(Johnston,1985)
ServiceMarketing
IntheBasicConceptspart,ithasbeenmentionedthattheproductionoftheservice
is a part of the “marketingmix” (Armistead, 1985, p. 12). This brings up a unique
characteristic of service marketing – which was called “interactive marketing”
(Grönroos,MarketingServices:TheCaseofaMissingProduct,1998). Intraditional
good-based marketing, the role of marketing is to bridge the gap between
productionandconsumption.However, intheservicecontext,thereisnosuchgap
exists; indeed, the service production process occurs right between producer and
consumer. Hence,marketing becomes part of the service production process. The
center of the marketing of service is how the service production and service
expectationmatch to eachother, so that consumers perceive good service quality
andarepersuadedtocontinuecomingtothesameservicefirm.(Grönroos,2000)
Inservicemarketing,itisveryimportanttounderstandthemetaphorofservicesasa
theater–aframeworkfordescribingandanalyzingaserviceexperience:“Conceiving
human behavior as drama depicts the service experience as a theatrical
‘performance’among‘actors”whopresentthemselvesinsuchawayastocreatea
desired impressionbeforean ‘audience’,or inwhatmightbe termed ‘front stage’.
Though the ‘rehearsal’ of performances is away from the audience’s view ‘back
stage’,aspectsiftheactors’presentationcanbeworkedout.“(Grove,Fisk,&John,
2000,p.28).
![Page 22: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
20
Figure5.ServicesasTheater
(Grove,Fisk,&John,2000)
Fourstrategictheatricalelementsarethentranslatedintoservicemarketingfieldas:
1. The actors (service personnel) whose presence and actions define the
service,
2.Theaudience(customers)towhomtheserviceisdirected,
3.Thesetting(thevenue)inwhichtheserviceprocessoccurs,and
4.Theserviceperformanceitself(theactionsthatshapethecustomers’
experience).
(Grove,Fisk,&John,2000,p.32)
Furthermore,inordertocapturethespecialcircumstancesexistingwhenmarketing
aserviceproduct,BoomsandBitnerexpandedthetraditionalmarketingmix“4Ps”
(McCarthy,1960)toincludeotherthreeelementsasParticipants,PhysicalEvidence,
and Process of Service Assembly (Booms & Bitner, 1981). In addition to Product,
Price,Place,andPromotionastraditional“4Ps”,aservicefirmsneedstomanagethe
personnelandcustomersthatinvolvedinserviceexperience,thephysicalaspectsof
the service, and the process by which the service is created and delivered. These
“three new Ps” have captured these elements, which are analogous to major
componentsofatheatricalproduction.(Grove,Fisk,&John,2000)
![Page 23: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
212.3 RestaurantManagement
Thispartwillanalyzetheexternalenvironmentoftherestaurantsector,theinternal
orindustryenvironmentofthesectoralongwithbasicfactorsandcharacteristicsof
therestaurantbusiness,andintroducesomekeyareasinthecasualandfinedining
restaurantoperationmanagement.
2.3.1 Externalenvironment
External environment is defined as themacro environment that consists of seven
components that have a potential influence on the industry and its competitive
environment:economicconditions,demographic,trendsoftechnology,politicaland
regulatory factors, social forces and global factors (Thompson, M.A., Gamble, &
Strickland,2011).ThispartwilldiscussthesecomponentsinthecontextofFinland.
EconomicFactors
According to Statistics Finland, consumers’ confidence in the economy slightly
weakened in June 2015 but in comparison to the year before, the expectations
concerningFinland’seconomyandunemploymentwereslightlybetter (Kangassalo,
2015). This year in July, theemployment ratewas0.50% lower thanayearbefore
and the unemployment rate was 1.4% higher than last year (Remes, 2015).
Nevertheless, the households’ wage and salary income rose by 1.2% in June
compared to last year (Uuttu, 2015). The producing prices for manufactured
products fell by 1.1% in comparison to July last year; due to the reductions in the
prices of oil products and food products from July 2014 (Huuskonen, 2015).
However,theyroseslightlyby0.1%fromJunetoJuly2015,whichmight indicatea
positiveforecastformanufacturingproductionthisyear(Huuskonen,2015).Abetter
consumer cautiousness, the stillweak labormarket conditions and a slight gain in
manufacturing production may indicate a slight process of an economic upturn,
which may improve the outcome for all industries including food service and
restaurantsector.
DemographicFactors
According to the Time Use Survey (2013) from Statistics Finland, eating at a
restaurant is distributed unevenly among the citizens. The age group that eats at
![Page 24: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
22restaurants most often is those aged from 25 to 34 years, who live alone or are
childless couples. Also according to the author, income seems to play a role in
choosinganexpensiveandhigh-qualityrestaurant,butitdoesnotplayamajorrole
invisitingfast-foodplaces,pizzeriasorethnicrestaurants.However,evenenjoyinga
good income, theageingpeople–whoare45yearsoldorolder–donotseemto
cometorestaurantsfrequentlyatall.Thus,thefrequencyofeatingoutisaffectedby
other factors rather than just income. Furthermore, at a national level, the time
spent at restaurants has declined steadily from what it was thirty years ago.
(Varjonen,2013)
TrendsofTechnology
Going mobile is a technology trend in the restaurant industry. The use of
smartphonesandtheabilitytoaccessrestaurantbookingsystemallowcustomersto
makereservationswithoutphonecallsaswellastherestaurantoperators.Another
trendis“checkinservices”likeFoursquarethatrepresentsthe"context-aware”type
ofadvertisingandappealstocustomersbecauseofitssophistications.Furthermore,
apaymentsystemsuchastheGooglewallet,whichcanstoreallthecreditcardsand
loyalty cards and enable redeeming of promotional offers, helps to speed up the
paymentprocesswhilestillsecurecustomerinformation.(Ban,2012)
PoliticalFactors
Intermsofpoliciesandregulationsthatcanaffecttherestaurant industry,onehas
tomentionthealcoholpolicy.TheFinnishparliamentintroducedtheprohibitionact
forthefirst time in1970,butthentheactwasreversed in1932.Afterthat,anew
law was set up in order to give the trade, import, and production monopoly of
alcohol to Alko – The Finnish Alcohol Company. The monopoly also covered the
establishment of licensed restaurants, prices, and rules concerning the serving of
alcoholic beverages. This monopoly has still been in force, but with more liberal
policy. However, this still places the Finnish restaurant industry under severe
restrictions.(Häkkinen,2010)
There isother current legislation that affectnegativelyon restaurantbusiness. For
instance,theratesofVATtaxchargedonfoodrestaurantshasbeenreducedrecently
to 14.0%, which was a good move, but still high, for example in comparison to
Swedenwith 12.0% (Worldwide Tax, 2015). In general, the income tax is also at a
![Page 25: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
23high level, and there isnopolicy supporting youngworkers (under26 yearsold) –
whocontributemostlytorestaurantindustry’sworkforce–incomparisontoSweden
supportedpolicyonthesameissue(Vihmo,2015).
SocioculturalFactors
Sociocultural forces includes attitude of the society and changes in people’s
preferencesandlifestyles(Ban,2012).
Thereusedtobeatimepeopleperceivedthatrestaurantswereonlytoservefoodor
forschoolstoteachchildrenaboutcivicmanners,andtheywerenotdesignedtobe
a place for any entertainment. This perception was shapedmostly by Alko – The
Finnish Alcohol Company. Later on, Finnish society had changed significantly, and
Finnishpeoplebegantodesireachange inrestaurantscenethatgradually ledtoa
newconceptofrestaurantsthatverysimilartonowadays.(Häkkinen,2010)
Intermsofchangesinlifestyles,itisobvioustoseethatpeoplearelookingformore
healthy,organic and freshlyprepared food,which lead towardspremiumproducts
andvalues.Anothertrendisthatpeopleprefertoeatathomeinsteadofgoingout,
whichisresultedfromtheconsequencesoftheeconomicdepression.(Ban,2012)
Furthermore,therearethreemainoccasionsforFinnishpeopletoeatout:eatingon
workingdays,eatingwhiletravellingandeatingoutinfreetime.Accordingtoastudy
onthetrendsofeatingout,about40.0%ofallmealstakenatrestaurantswerework
related,about43.0%ofthemareeatingwhiletravelling,andtherestforeatingout
infreetime.(Varjonen,2013)
GlobalFactors
Globalforcesareassociatedwitheconomicsituationintheworld,whichappearsto
slowly reviveanddemonstratehealthy indicators.Moreover, thechange inclimate
can also influence the industry. The environmental issues lead to the urge of
reducingwater consumption and raising emission tax. This in general can increase
theoperationcostsforbusinesses.(Ban,2012)
2.3.2 Industryenvironment
Inordertoanalyzetheindustryenvironmentofrestaurantsector,thePorter’sFive-
ForceModel is applied. Thismodel enables to identify different forces and factors
![Page 26: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
24that bring about competitive pressure (Thompson, M.A., Gamble, & Strickland,
2011).
Figure6.ForcesGoverningCompetitioninanIndustry
(Porter,HowCompetitiveForcesShapeStrategy,2008)
Rivalry
Therestaurants industry’scompetitionishighly intenseforthefollowingoffactors.
Firstofall, it is inthenatureofthebusinessthatitoffersperishableproducts,that
creates strong temptation to cut prices which leads to price competition (Porter,
2008).Moreover,eachrestauranthastheirownthemeandfoodstyle,whichmeans
thatrivalsarediverseinstrategiesand“personalities”,whichcreatesdifferentiation
(Porter,2008).Furthermore,whendistinguishesbetweenchainedandindependent
sectors, chained full-service restaurants, suchas S-Group,Rosso, andAmarillo, has
greatperformance last yearwith5,0% increase innumbersofoutlet (Euromonitor
International, 2015). These well-known restaurants regular update menus and
![Page 27: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
25concepts,anddeveloplargecustomerloyaltybonusprogramandotherspecialoffers
anddiscounts.Thiscreatesahugepressureonindependentsector.
ThreatofNewEntrants
For the restaurant industry, theeconomiesof scalearenotmajorbarriers, though
theymightplayan importantrole forchainedrestaurants.Brand identificationand
customer loyalty barriers are possible to overcome by product differentiation as
consumers naturally have a tendency to look for a different dining experience
(EuromonitorInternational,2015).Capitalrequirementsarevarieddependingonthe
scaleof restaurants.However, it canbe assumed tobe lowas it canbe seen that
restaurants are a common form of start-ups for small business and immigrants.
Finally, government policy might directly affect new entrants by several policy
requirements such as alcohol license requirement, food hygiene standards and
environmentalpolicyconcerningtrash,airandwatermanagement.
BargainingPowerofSuppliers
The restaurant industry is certainly an important customer of the supplier group.
They oftenmake up a big fraction of the supplier’s sale, so that can weaken the
bargaining power of suppliers, according to Porter (Porter, 2008). However, it is
possiblethatthemarketisdominatedbyafewsupplycompanies,duetothetypical
difficultyincultivatingandprovidingfoodinFinland.Thus,thesuppliergroupmight
havestrongerbargainingpoweroverrestaurants.
BargainingPowerofBuyers
The buyers’ bargaining power is strong, because there is no switching cost for
customers when choosing different restaurants to dine. Moreover, nowadays
consumershaveatendencytopaymoreattentiontothequalityofthefood,suchas
healthy ingredients and fresh prepared food, which means they are less price-
sensitive(EuromonitorInternational,2015).Thatcanalsostrengthentheirpower.
ThreatofSubstitutes
Threatofsubstitutesisquitestrongbecausethereisnoswitchingcostforconsumers
to change the place to dine. The price, quality and product performance varying
significantlyarealsoonereasonthatcustomerswanttomakeuseofthedifference
andswitchover.Actually,thereisalreadyawiderangeofsubstitutesavailableinthe
market.
![Page 28: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
262.3.3 Classification
Foodandbeverageoperationconsistsofmanyareasinwhichrestaurantsisonlyone
part.Figure10describesthefoodandbeverageindustrybreakingdownintosectors.
Figure7.AClassificationofFoodandBeverageOperations
(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012)
There is abroaddistinctionbetweencostandmarketorientationacross sectors in
theindustry.Amarketorientedbusinessoftenhasahighpercentageoffixedcosts,
unstablemarketdemand,andreliesonincreasinginrevenueratherthandecreasein
costs to contribute to profit levels. A cost oriented business often has a lower
percentageof fixedcosts, relativelystablemarket,andreliesondecreases incosts
ratherthanincreasesinsalestocontributetotheprofitlevelsoftheestablishment.
In themain,most hospitality establishment falls into oneof those two categories.
However, in some areas it might be hard to precisely define as they can display
characteristicsofbothorientationsatdifferenttimesduringtheirbusiness.However,
inmostcases,full-servicerestaurantsaremarketorientedduetothecharacteristic
![Page 29: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
27of high fixed costs and unstable demand. (Davis, Lockwood, Alcott, & Pantelidis,
2012,pp.45-56)
2.3.4 Internalissues
The external factors that can affect the operation of full-service restaurants have
been discussed in the previous part. This part will lists the internal factors and
problemslikelytoariseineachfactorinarestaurantorganization,accordingtothe
book“FoodandBeverageManagement”byDavis, Lockwood,AlcottandPantelidis
(2012).
FoodandBeverage
• Perishableoffood
• Theneedforadequatestockturnover
• Wastageandportioncontrol
• Shrinkagefromkitchens,restaurants,andstores
Staff
• Staffshortagesorskillshortages
• Managingstafflevelstomatchpeaksandbottomofsaleperiods
• Absenteeism,illness,etc.
• Useofpart-timeorcasualstaff
• Lackoforpoorsupervisionandtrainingofnewstaff
• Highstaffturnover
Control
• Cashandcreditcontrolandcollection
• Maintaining costs in line with budget guidelines and current volumes of
business
• Keepingatightandefficientcontroloffoodandbeveragestocks
• Up-to-datecostingandpricingofmenuitems
• Managing efficient food and beverage control system to analyze statistical
dataandperformances.
(Op.cit.p73)
![Page 30: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
282.3.5 Mainareas
Thispartwillintroduceandbrieflyexplainsomekeyareasandfactorsinoperations
ofafull-servicerestaurantestablishment.
MealExperience
“Mealexperience”isdefinedas“aseriesofevents–bothtangibleandintangible–
that a customer experiences when eating out” (Campbell-Smith, 1989; Davis,
Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012).Inordertosatisfycustomers,thetypeofmeal
experience offered by a food service facility must be tailored to match the
requirements and expectations of the customer. The basic step is to identify the
market segments:who are the customers andwhat do theywant. Then there are
severalaspectsthatthemanagercanlookatinordertodeterminewhatshouldbe
done. These aspects are: type of food and drink, variety inmenu choice, level of
service, price and value for money, interior design, atmosphere and mood,
expectation and their identification of restaurants, location and accessibility, and
service employees. Above all, it is important to note that requirements from the
samecustomermayvary fromonemeal experience toanother. (Davis, Lockwood,
Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,pp.82-90)
FinancialImplications
The financial tasks of a restaurant manager are quite similar to other businesses
including:costcontrol,cashflowmanagementandpurchasingdecision-making.Cash
management plays a significant role especially to small businesses like restaurants
(Wallace & Forte, 2008). While it does not apply to every case, most full-service
restaurants aremarket - oriented and they often have financial policies following
that.Thepercentageoffixedcostsisoftenmuchhighercomparedtothepercentage
ofvariablecosts,sothatadropinsaleswillaffectsignificantlytheprofitabilityofthe
establishment.(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,p.105)
![Page 31: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
29TheMenu
Menuisthekeymarketingandsellingtoolforrestaurants. Itcommunicatesawide
rangeofinformationtocustomersthroughthewordsused,colors,layout,qualityof
materialused,andstyles.Themenu,togetherwithotherphysicalattributes,creates
a level of expectation from customers that should be matched by the meal
experience.Creatingamenu includesaspectssuchasMenuContent,MenuDesign
(such as theme, typography, colors, graphics, shape, and materials, layout of the
menu, size and form), and Menu Pricing. Menu content is the most important
attribute.Whenarrangingthecontent,thepopularityofmenuitemsandfavorability
ofcustomersacrossitemsshouldbetakenintoconsiderationsothatthebestselling
itemsarewellemphasized.Moreover, it is importantthatthestaff iseducatedand
trained to obtain the menu knowledge so that they can provide good advice to
customers.(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,pp.127-135)
FacilityDesignandLayout
Typically, restaurants allocate about 40 to 60 percent of their space to the dining
area,about30percenttothekitchenandpreparationarea,andtherestforstorage
andofficespace(Jacquelyn,2001,p.36).
Thecustomerserviceareainrestaurants,referredtoas“frontofhouse”,isdesigned
basedonthelevelofservice,andmoreoftenitisexpectedtoallowfarmorespace
per seat in FineDining andCasualDining restaurants, compared toothers such as
fast-foodoperation.Thekitchen,referredtoas“backofhouse”,typicallyincludes:a
cold preparation section for the assembling of appetizers, salads and desserts; a
cookingstationwheremaincoursesarecooked;ahotplateareatoplatedishes;a
dishwashingarea;andasuppliersareaforfoodstorageandlinen.(Davis,Lockwood,
Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,pp.210-212)
Inventory
The basic stock has to fulfill two functions: first is to provide customers with
reasonable assortment of food products, and second is to cover the normal sales
demandofthebusiness(Jacquelyn,2001,p.97).Intermsofpurchasing,itshouldbe
![Page 32: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
30noted that different categories of product require different strategies for
procurement, for instance most straightforward are branded goods, and most
difficultarefreshseasonalproduce(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,pp.
131-134)
Production
Productionprocess is closely associated to cost control and capacitymanagement.
The daily running costs of food, labor and fuel have to be strictly planned and
controlled. The capacity management is involved with material handling, staffing
levels and facilities. Moreover, production management is concerned with
supervision management, hygiene and safety standards, and cleaning and
maintenance tasks. The production process is often involved two systems: cook-
freezeproductionandcook-chillproduction.(Op.cit.p192-195.)
ProductionControl
Productioncontrolfunctionsasaguidanceandregulationforthecostsandrevenue
ofoperatingcateringactivityinarestaurant.Theobjectivesofacontrolsystemare
the analysis of income and expenditure, establishment and maintenance of
standards, pricing, prevention of waste, prevention of fraud, and management
information.Basicconcepts inproductioncontrolare:productionplanning(volume
forecasting); standard yields (measurementofusablepartsofproducts after initial
preparation);standardrecipes(thewrittenscheduleforproducingamenuitem),and
standardportionsize(thestandardquantityofafooditemthatwillbeserved).The
productioncontrolcanbedonemanuallyorbysoftwaresystem.(Op.cit.p152-157.)
QualityManagement
Qualitymanagementisasystembuiltforcontrollingandmaintainingthequalityin
ordertomeetthesatisfactionofcustomerneeds.Inotherwords,thesystemworks
tokeeptheconsistencyofproductandserviceperformancetocustomers,theso
called“mealexperience”.(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,p.178)
Figure11describesthetotalfeaturesandcharacteristicsofamealexperience.
![Page 33: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
31
Figure8.TheFoodProduct/ServiceMatrix
(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012)
Thismatrixisappliedwhensettingupastandardexperiencetobeachievedaswell
asforexaminingtheexistedperformanceofarestaurant(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&
Pantelidis, 2012). On the other hand, the quality management takes place across
manyoperationprocessesofarestaurant.Onebasictooltouseisthecycleofquality
management. Thequalitymanagement cyclewasdevelopedbasedon theDeming
PDCA(Plan-Do-Check-Act)(Deming,1982).ItconsistsoffourmainstepsofPlan,Do,
Check, Act and issues associated with each step. Figure 9 illustrates the cycle as
shownbelow.
![Page 34: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
32
Figure9.TheQualityManagementCycle
(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012)
The essential of quality management is to design quality control into the process
instead of waiting for mistakes to happen. There is an increasing numbers of
companies that usequality control in order improve the standardsof services and
productsdeliveredtocustomers,andcompaniesthatdonotuseonefindithardto
competeinthemarket.(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,pp.178-179)
Marketing
A unique characteristic of the service business is that the service product is
consumedatthepointofproduction.Thustheproductionunitofservice ispartof
themarketingmix(Armistead,1985,p.12).Inotherwords,marketingisasupporting
![Page 35: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
33partoftheproductionprocess(Grove,Fisk,&John,2000,p.59).Themarketingmix
of restaurants, inherently fromservicemarketing, consistsof “7Ps”:Product,Price,
Promotion, Place, Process, Physical Evidence, and Participants (Davis, Lockwood,
Alcott, & Pantelidis, 2012, p. 15). While most of these components are in the
productionprocess, thepriceandpromotionare the two components that canbe
done before the “production-consumption point” in order to attract consumers to
the restaurants, in which the promotion is more important. Common promotion
methods are advertising, public relations, merchandising, sales promotion and
personal selling (Davis, Lockwood, Alcott, & Pantelidis, 2012). Online and social
marketing is the trendnow:online reviewshavebecomepopular aswell as social
mediadiscounts(GrouponWorks,2013).
Staffing
There are several categories of personnel in a full -service restaurant: manager,
cooks,servers,buspersons(personswhosetupandcleartables),dishwashers,hosts
(persons who seat guests, take reservations and act as cashier), and bartenders.
Cookscanincludeatleasttwofull-timecooksforworkdaysandevenings,inaddition
to part-time cookswhohelp during thepeakhours and in slowperiods do simple
preparation. Insomerestaurants,thechefhiredisacelebritychef,whichcreatesa
marketing attraction to customers. In a full-service restaurant, typically thepayroll
costsshouldbeabout24to35percentofthetotalgrosssales.(Jacquelyn,2001,pp.
78-85)
The tasks of staff management include recruitment, staff training, staff schedule,
supervision, and staff motivation and retention (Davis, Lockwood, Alcott, &
Pantelidis,2012).
SuggestedKeySuccessFactors
According to the IBISWorld, there are several key factors that contribute to the
successofafull-servicerestaurantincluding:
•Ability to react fastandadequate to thechangesand regulations in theareasof
foodsafetyandhandling;
![Page 36: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
34• Accessibility to multi-skilled and flexible workforce in order to meet customer
seasonaldemand;
•Abilitytocontrolstockonhandespeciallybyutilizingcostcontrol
• Adaptability of new technologies,which can increase profitability and lower the
costoflabor
• Proximity to key markets by following customer’s preferences of a favorable
locationtoincreaseguesttraffic.
(Ban,2012,p.23)
2.3.6 TheoreticalFramework
Thetheoreticalframeworkisthecombinationofconceptstakenfromthereview.It
isillustratedasthefollowingmap.
Figure10.TheoreticalFrameworkforResearchDesign
![Page 37: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
35
The framework startswith the concept of Key Success Factor and its classification
depending on two dimensions: conjunctive/compensatory and changeability. The
success factors are then categorized by the main areas in restaurant operations
rangingfrombackroomtofrontoffice–usingconceptsfromservicemanagement.
Thediagramthen isplacedunderthe industryandmacroenvironment’s influence.
Thisframeworkisappliedtoconducttheresearch,whichisfurtherexplainedinthe
nextchapter.
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Researchapproach
According toDenzin and Lincoln (2005) in their bookTheHandbook ofQualitative
Research,thedefinitionofqualitativeresearchisasthefollowing:
Qualitative research is a situated activity that locates the observer in the
world. It consists of a set of interpretive, material practices that make the
world visible... At this level, qualitative research involves an interpretive,
naturalistic approach to the world. This means that qualitative researchers
study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or
interpret,phenomenaintermsofthemeaningspeoplebringtothem.
(Denzin&Lincoln,2005,p.5)
Creswell(2007,74)alsoreferredtoqualitativeresearchasanykindofresearchthat
pursuing findingswithoutany statisticalmethodsorquantitativemeans.According
tothesameauthor,qualitativeresearchstudiesprocessesandprovidesmeaningful
interpretation in order to describe and understanding phenomena. While
quantitative research is based on numbers, qualitative research applies narrative
outcomes.Adirectcontactbetweentheresearcherandtherespondentintheright
context ispartofqualitative research.The researcheractsasan instrument in the
data collection and analysis processes, which become results of the study. The
![Page 38: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
36researchmethods for collectingdataareobservation,different interviewmethods,
writtenmaterial,actionresearchandcasestudies.(Creswell,2007).
In this study, theauthoraimed to to findout somehypothesesabout the subject.
Considering thesuccess in restaurantmanagementpracticeasaphenomenon, this
task involves exploring and describing the factors contributing to the success. It is
moreofadescriptiontaskthanameasurementtask.Basedonthat,theauthorwas
convincedthatqualitativeresearchisthesuitableapproachfortheresearch.
3.2 Datacollection
In this qualitative research, interview was chosen as the research method. The
purposeoftheinterviewsistoexploreandrevealthefactorsthatcontributetothe
successofarestaurant.Inordertoachievethat,theauthoraimedtointerviewthe
restaurantmanagersof “successful” full-serviceFinnish restaurants.The reason for
choosingmanagerstointerviewisthattheyarethekeyactorsinrestaurantbusiness
andtheyhavepracticalexperienceinrestaurantmanagement.
The author chose semi-structure as the interview format. This means that the
interviewswerenothighlystructureasacaseofinterviewsthatconsistofallclosed-
endedquestions,nortotallyunstructuredwherethereisnoexistingscriptorsetof
questions. In semi-structured interviews, interviewers offer topics and some
questions to interviewees, but they are designed cautiously in order to elicit the
interviewee’s ideas and opinions of interest, as opposed to leading interviewees
towardpreconceivedchoices.Thereasonforchoosingthemethodisthatitprovides
more in-depth answers and more flexibility for interviewers’ follow-up questions.
(Zorn,2005).
The aim was to choose as well-performed restaurants as possible, for the topic
involvingcriticalsuccessfactors.Inordertodothat,theselectionoftherestaurant
managers was carried out based on their restaurants’ ranking in Finland and the
number of years in operation. The ranking reveals customers’ preference of a
restaurantandshowitspopularitybyprovidingacertainnumberofvisitspaidtothe
restaurantincomparisontootherrestaurantsintheregion.Thisattributethusmight
beusedasasuccessindicatortoassessthelevelofarestaurantperformanceinstead
![Page 39: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
37of the profitability numbers, which were hardly possible to collect. The ranks of
restaurantswerereferredfromreliableonlinereviewsources,suchasTripAdvisor,
Lonely Planet, and Foursquare application. Furthermore, the number of years in
operationwas considered important aswell – the older the better, as it could be
seenasanevidenceforthesuccessoftherestaurantandindicateagreatnumberof
yearsofexperienceofthemanager.Theyearsofoperationwerecollectedfromthe
samesourcesmentioned,aswellasfromtherestaurants’websites.
The researcher conducted two interviews. Both were one-on-one interviews. The
interviewees are restaurant managers of two restaurants in Jyväskylä. The first
interviewwaswiththemanagerofFigaroRestaurant.Figaroisa90-seatrestaurant
located in an old stone building in the center of Jyväskylä. Restaurant Figaro has
beennamedasthetop-choicerestaurantinFinlandbyLonelyPlanet(LonelyPlanet,
2014).IthasbeenalsograntedtheChaînedesRôtisseursplate–anawardfromthe
famous International Association of Gastronomy Chaîne des Rôtisseurs – in June
2010 (Ahonen, 2014). TheFigaroWinebistrowas Finland’s bestwine restaurantof
the year in 2012, 2014, and this year 2015 (Numminen, 2015). The restaurant has
been operated since the year 2000. The manager has started to work in the
restaurant since 2005. He has educational background in restaurant management
combining with economics and marketing and sales. He has twenty-two years of
workingexperienceinthefield.
The second interview was conducted with the manager of Vesilinna Restaurant.
Vesilinna is located at the city’s top ridge “Harju hill” offering an exceptional
panoramic view of the city. The restaurant has been highly ranked inmost of the
reviews,especiallywellknownforitsrichanduniquewinecollection.Therestaurant
hasbeen inoperationforoverfifteenyears.Themanagerhasbeenthedirectorof
the restaurant since then. He has educational background in restaurant and hotel
management,andcustomerservicemanagement.Hehasbeenworking inthefield
forovertwentyyears.1
Beforetheinterviews,thepotentialquestionsandtopicsectionsforinterviewswere
designedalongwithacodingsystem.Thetopicsections,alsocalled“themes,”were
createdbasedonthetheoreticalframeworkoftheresearch.Therewereabouttwo
1Thegendersoftwomanagersarefictional.
![Page 40: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
38to fivequestions foreachtheme.Thequestionswerebothclosedandopen-ended
questions.ThelistsofcodesandinterviewquestionscanbefoundintheAppendices.
The time framewas carefully taken into considerationwhen setting thequestions.
Theinterviewswererecordedbyrecordingdeviceandtranscribedlateron.
Inqualitativeresearch,thereisnorightnumberofinterviews.However,identifying
andgettingaccesstotherightkindofpeopleandplanninghowmanytointerviewis
important.Thequalityoftheinformation,togetherwiththelengthanddepthofthe
interviews, are the key factors. It is important to interview as many people as
necessarytogainenoughknowledgeaboutthesubject.Duringtheinterviews,when
the same information begins to appear repeatedly and the interviewer learns less
and less fromeach interview, the topic is coveredcompletely. (Brennen,2013,pp.
28-30)
Considering the interviewees’ relations to the topic, theselectionwasvalid for the
research. The two interviews,while exposeda fewdifferentpoints, revealedquite
the same content about the subject. Moreover, the interviews were long and
comprehensive enough to give sufficient data to the topic. Therefore, the author
decidedtofinishthedatacollectionprocessandstartedtheanalysis.
3.3 Dataanalysis
The analysis approach is called the systematic procedures, using constant
comparativemethodofdataanalysis.ItwasdevelopedbyStraussandCorbin(1990),
andcanbedescribedasa “zigzag”process:out to the field to collect information,
intoofficetoanalyzethedata,backtothefiledtogathermoreinformation,intothe
office,andsoforth(Strauss&Corbin,1990).
As mentioned above, a system of coding was developed before interviews
representingthethemesaccordingtothetheoreticalframework.Thispre-setcoding
systemwasusedwhencreatingthequestionsbeforetheinterviewsaswellascoding
thedatacollectedaftertheinterviews.Afterthefirstinterview,theresearcherbegan
to transcribe and analyzed the collected data right before conducting the second
one.Thismethodallowedthe researcher to improvequestionsanddevelopbetter
approachforthenextinterview.
![Page 41: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
39The first interview was transcribed from recording device into a Microsoft Word
document. After transcription, the next process was the data reduction. Data
reduction refers to theprocessof “selecting, focusing, simplifying,abstracting,and
transformingthedatathatappearinwrittenupfieldnotesortranscriptions”(Miles
&Huberman,1994).ThedatawasreadthroughfromtheWorddocumentandthe
researcheridentifiedrelevanttextsaccordingtothemes(codes)andmarkedthemin
differentfontcolors.ThesetextswerethencopiedtoanExceldocumentcategorized
according to their codes – the document is basically a table consisting of two
columns: code and text. Then the sorting function of Excel was used to sort the
“code”column,inordertopresentthetextscodebycode.Thetablethenshowedall
relevant texts from the transcripts according to each code. The author then
identified and analyzed each theme according to the theoretical framework. Then
theauthoremergedthecategoriesaccordingtotheinformationgatheringfromthe
first interview. After conducting the second interview, the same process of
transcription and reduction was carried out. The author then compared and
contrastedthedata fromboth interviewsto thetheoryandcreatedpointsofview
interrelating to the theoretical framework. The results were then displayed by
themesintheresultsection.ThelistofcodesisincludedintheAppendices.
3.4 Verificationofresults
Manyperspectivesexist regarding the validation inqualitative research. This study
willapplythecriteriadevelopedbyLeCompteandGoetz(1982),whohavesearched
for and found qualitative equivalents that parallel traditional quantitative
approaches to validation (LeCompte & Goetz, 1982). The system is included four
criteria:internalvalidity,externalvalidity,reliability,andobjectivity.
Internalvalidityreferstothetruth-valueoftheresearch,whetherthefindingsofthe
studymake sense and if they are credible to the research community and others
(Miles & Huberman, 1994). The author tried to achieve that by establishing good
linksbetweencategoriesoftheoryandthedata,buildingexplanations,andchecking
forcoherenceofconceptsthroughoutthestudy(Yin,2003).
Externalvalidityreferstogeneralizationandtransferabilityofthestudy,whetherthe
findings can be transferred to other contexts and how far the findings can be
![Page 42: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
40generalized (Miles & Huberman, 1994). The most central to generalization in
qualitative research is that it relies on “the descriptive representativeness of the
sample(orsetofparticipantsorsettingsonwhichdataareactuallycollected)”(Flick,
2014). Sampling, or selection strategies, is the central of this issue, whether the
samplingpeople,settings,events,andprocesses,canbetherepresentative for the
population (Miles & Huberman, 1984). The author aimed to generate generation
aboutFinnishfull-servicerestaurantsfromthecollectedresults.Inordertodothat,
theauthorcarriedouttheselectionprocesscautiouslytoachievethattheselected
intervieweesweretherightsampleforresearch.Therestaurantsselectedwerefull-
service Finnish restaurants, which are located in Finland, owned and operated by
Finnish.TheyarehighrankedrestaurantsinFinland;andbothhavestayedforover
fifteenyearsinbusiness.Themanagersoftheserestaurants,asintervieweesforthe
research,havericheducationalbackgroundandpracticalexperienceinthefield.The
authorconsideredthattheserestaurantscanrepresentsuccessfulfull-serviceFinnish
restaurants,andthedatatakenfromthemanagersoftheserestaurantsarereliable
to the research.Moreover, the author took the issue of representativeness to the
dataanalysisprocesstoseeifthefactorsmentionedbytheintervieweescarriedthe
country-levelattributesandcouldbegeneratedtonationalscale(Flick,2014).
Reliabilityreferstotheconsistenceandstabilityofthestudyprocessovertimeand
across researchers and methods (Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 278). In order to
achieve it, the author obtained field notes by employing a good-quality tape for
recording andwhen transcribing the tape, kept inmind that the tapeneeds tobe
meticulouslytranscribedandnoticed“trivial,butoftencrucial,pausesandoverlaps”
(Creswell, 2007).Moreover, to gainmore reliability for the study, the author also
cautiously approached the data sources and chose reliable and trustworthy
documentstoextractinformationfrom(Howell&Prevenier,2011).
Objectivity refers to the “relative neutrality and freedom from unacknowledged
researcherbias,orexplicitnessaboutinevitablebias”(Miles&Huberman,1994).To
enhance it, the author clarified her bias from the outset of the study so that she
understoodherpositionandassumptions that impact the inquiry (Merriam,1988).
Moreover, the author tried to enhance objectivity bymaking compliance between
thedataandtheoryalongtheanalysisprocessinordertominimizesubjectivity.
![Page 43: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
414 RESULTS
In general, the two interviewees presented similar viewpoints about the basic
functionsandcriticalfactorsinoperation.However,insomeareastheyhaddifferent
approachesandwaysofconduct.Theresultsarediscussedaccordingtothethemes
thatassociatedwiththetheoreticalframework.Theorderofthethemesisorganized
differently from the order in the theoretical framework in order to highlight the
importanceofcertainthemesandtogiveacomprehensiveflowofinformation.
4.1 Strategy
Both restaurants set a very clear strategy to differentiate themselves fromothers.
The competitive levelwas seen to be tough andmuch heavier than a decade ago
whentherewereonlyafewplaces.Thestrategiessetbythemdifferwidely.
Onerestaurantreliesonitslocationasthecorecompetitiveadvantageasthetophill
locationoftherestaurantoffersanoutstandingviewofthetown.Accordingtothe
manageroftherestaurant,thestylesoftheplaceandthefurniturehavebeenkept
unchanged for almost all the years. Themanager intends to keep the same style,
simple, classical and “throughout the years”, in the dining room so that it draws
customers’ attention to the scenery through the windows and the sophisticated
visualoftheplates.Controversialenough,themanageralsoperceivesitslocationas
adisadvantagecomparedtoothercompetitors.Thereasonisthatitslocationisnot
aseasytobereachedasotherrestaurantsinthedowntownarea.Itisaminuspoint
tothelocalsthattherestaurantisfaraway.
The other restaurant, on the other hand, focuses on creating a new dining
experience.Therestaurantorganizesmanyeventsandhappeningsaroundtheyear
topromoteexoticandspecialcuisinefromFinlandandothercountries.Forexample,
themanagercreatedaspecialmontheventbyinvitingacelebritycheffromHelsinki
toownthekitchentogetherwithhiscrewandthatattractedalmostonethousand
customers.RecentlytherestaurantofferedthetastingofdishesmadeofKobebeef
fromJapanforonemonth.Themanagerbelievesthatpeoplelovenewthings,which
is the core of their strategy. The restaurant always tries to be ahead of their
competitors in updating trends and creating new offerings to customers. Another
![Page 44: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
42directoroftherestaurant is frequentlyontravellingandgettingnewideastobring
backtotherestaurant.Thisstrategyisverydistinguishedbutitundeniablydemands
alotofhardworkandinvestment.
Both of the managers recognized the indispensable role of strategy in their
positioningof today.Eventhoughthe levelof focusand investmentonstrategyby
each restaurant is different, they intentionally set out clear strategies and actively
pursuethem.Furthermore,theykeeponbeingalerttowhattheothercompetitors
aredoingdifferentlyorwhatistrendyinthemarket.
4.2 Production&Control
The production part involves closelywith purchasing and inventory functions. This
includes processes of planning the volume, ordering rawmaterials, inspection and
handling materials, prepare uncooked materials, doing portions to serve clients,
managingwasteandstandardyield.Thiscostsmostofthetimebecauseforthetwo
restaurants, they prepare everything from scratch and purchase no ready-made
food.
Furthermore, the production process includes the task of renovating recipes. The
processconsistsofcookingandtastingoffood,tastingofwine,andtryingfoodand
winecombination.Inonerestaurant,theprocessiscarriedoutfourtimesayearin
order to create a new food and wine menu. The manager called it “product
development”. However, this task has not been given enough time recently,
accordingtothesamemanager,whichshouldbeimproved.
Answering to the question of what makes a dining restaurant succeed, both
managers emphasized on “the quality of food”, or “good food” as the most
importantfactor.Firstofall,itisnecessarytonotethatinthiscontextthetermwas
used to indicate thewell-taste levelof the food, thewine,and thecombinationof
foodandwine.Itdoesnotrefertothequalityofrawmaterials(eventhoughitgoes
hand in hand). Itmight bemore precisely called the quality of food products that
served to the customers. Bothmanagers stated this factor as the basic – first and
foremostthing.Theyhavethesamephilosophythatthetasteisthemostimportant
thinginarestaurant.Accordingtoonemanager,ithasbeenresearchedaboutwhich
![Page 45: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
43aspect of restaurant foodmatters themost to Finnish people. The result showed
thatthetastecountedformorethanfiftypercent,thevisualofthefoodcountedfor
morethantwentypercent,andtherestoflessthantwentypercentcountedforthe
techniqueandotheraspects.Thus,thequalityoffoodproductsisclearlythefocusof
both managers. The production and production control is the direct process to
produce the food product. Correspondently, bothmanagers highly concentrate on
thisarea.
4.3 Inventory
Bothrestaurantstrytousethelocalingredientsasmuchaspossible,andbytheterm
“local” the interviewees referred to Finland. One difficulty in purchasing is the
availability of ingredients for the reason that the growing season is fairly short in
Finland.While fish andmeat aremainly purchased from Finnish farms, vegetables
andotheringredientsarepurchasedfromotherpartsoftheworld.
For one restaurant, purchasing fresh and seasonal products is of a great concern
because of the large volume in demand. In order to handle it, a large amount of
purchased raw material has to be frozen in good portions. The manager of the
restaurantalsoemphasizedabouttheimportanceofgoodqualityrawmaterial.For
his restaurant, he usually purchases the best rawmaterial even though it ismore
costly. This is done in order achieve the difference in the taste and in the overall
qualityofthefoodserved.Ithelpstodifferentiatehisrestaurantfromtheothers.
Another problem for both restaurants is about suppliers. It is not difficult to find
suppliers, stated by both managers. There are many suppliers and they actively
approach and contact the two restaurants. Even for exotic raw material, the
suppliersactivelyapproachtheserestaurantsanddomarketingforthemselves.The
challenge,however, istofindtheconsistencyfromsupplierstoprovidethefoodin
demand. This happens especially for fresh and seasonal food material. This also
affects the menu: some dishes cannot be put on the regular menu due to the
instability of suppliers. Consequently, bothmanagers have to constantly seek for
suppliers in order to secure themselves from disruption. However, there are also
manysuppliersthatkeepworkingwiththerestaurantsforyears.Thiscreatesalong
![Page 46: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
44relationship between the buyers and sellers, which significantly enhances the
purchasingperformance,especiallyforwineimport.
4.4 Menu
Both restaurants offer regular and seasonalmenu. For one restaurant, the regular
menu remains quite steady over time, while the seasonal menu often varies
depending on new trends happening in restaurant business as well as on the
availabilityofrawmaterial.Theotherrestaurantupdatestheirregularmenuabout
fourtimesayear.Therearealsoextraeventsandhappeningsthatrequireanother
special set of menu. The manager of the restaurant highly emphasized on the
importance of innovating menu frequently in order to achieve the best result.
Moreover,theyalsohavedifferentapproachestothewinemenu.Onemanagerlikes
tokeepitsteadyandtrytochoosetypeofwinesthatarefriendlytocustomers.The
other manager focuses on the trendy wines and frequently updates the wine
collection.Everytimethefoodandwinemenuisupdated,themanagergivesother
staffeducationaboutthenewtypesoffoodandwineandtogethertheycreatethe
combinationofthem.
4.5 Staff
As mentioned above, the first factor of a successful restaurant according to the
interviewees is the quality of food product. The second factor is human resource.
Whilebothmanagersaffirmedthesignificanceofhumanresource,oneofthemfaces
moreseriousproblemsinturnovercomparedtotheother.
Bothagreedthatthechallengeofstaffmanagementistofindtherightpeople,which
is a veryhardand longprocess.According toonemanager, in this area, there are
manyprofessionalsavailableandalsogoodtraineesfromschoolswhoarewillingto
do practical training. However, while the basic mechanical work can be easily
learned, the right kind of attitude is more difficult to obtain. This skill is more of
naturallyborn;otherwiseitisveryhardtolearn,thoughpossible.Forthepurposeof
gettingthebestpeople,itusuallycoststhemanageralongandexpensiveprocessof
recruitment. For theothermanager, he shared that the restaurant staff shouldbe
![Page 47: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
45polite and friendly, and the most important thing is that they must respect
customers. This not only applies to waiters and waitresses but also kitchen staff,
administrationstaffandothers.Tohim,arestaurantmustmakesurethattheyhave
therightworkers.Asaresult,themanagerhimselfputalotofinvestmentintoit.
However, according to one manager, another challenge, which often arises after
obtainingtherightpeople,istokeepthemstaywiththebusiness.Whenarestaurant
finds a goodworker, the other competitors are also interested so that they try to
take the worker from that restaurant. Consequently, if one restaurant changes a
worker, forexample itschefdecuisine, thewholerotationstarts togoaroundthe
marketanditformsafluctuationintheworkplaces.Moreover,inthemoderndays,
people are not committed to one place. Instead they want to have experience in
several working places or in different jobs. It often happens that people want to
movetootherareasintheSouthernpartofFinlandtogetmoreexperience.Another
reasonmightbethehigh-demandingnatureofworkinginrestaurants.Theworking
timeislongandexhaustingeveryday.Peoplewithfamilyorkidsoftenfindittoohard
tomanagethattheyhavetoquit.
On theotherhand, the turnover is usually a loss, but sometimes it canbe a good
thing,statedbythesamemanager.Heregardeditas“gettingnewblood”.Itenables
him to get new ideas, newviews andnewwaysof doingbusiness. Related to this
topic,themanagermentionedaboutthediversityofnationalityinhiskitchen,which
includesFinnish,German,Russian,andItalian.Thiscreatesaculturalrichnessinthe
workingenvironment,andsofarithaspositivelyinfluencedtheperformanceofthe
restaurant. For example, the kitchen staff creates an international twist to the
Finnish authentic cuisine,which has received very good feedback from customers.
However,inspiteofthesebenefits,theturnoverstillremainsasaseriousproblemto
themanager.Thisproblemhappenseveryyeareither in thedining roomor in the
kitchen.Thiscoststhemanageralargeamountoftimeandmoney,andsometimes
causesdisruptionintheoperationoftherestaurant.
Above all, bothmanagers stated that the team effort is the key to success. They
repeated that everybodyworking for the company needs to understand the goals
and working towards the same direction with the same code of conduct. The
managerstrytoachievethatthroughcommunicationwiththeteamondailybasis.
![Page 48: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
46According to both of them, great staff combiningwith a pleasant atmosphere can
create what the interviewees called “a good service”. A good service and a good
qualityof foodproducts are two fundamental elementsof a successful restaurant,
statedbytwomanagers.
4.6 Marketing
Both restaurants target regular customers, clients (such as companies and
organizations) and tourists. The regular customers are the locals. They aremainly
people aging from forty to fifty years with their families. However, nowadays,
youngerpeoplealsotendtocome.Theregularcustomersmakeupthelargestpart
of total customers of the restaurants. The second large part is the clients. Clients
makeup thecustomer segment that comes to restaurants forbusiness reason, for
example companies, universities, insurance companies and so on. This sometimes
can require a catering function with a high profile. However, this segment has
declinedrecentlyduetonegativeeconomicfactors,accordingtoonemanager.The
last segment is tourists and visitors. These customersmainly come in the summer
andsometimesintheotherseasons.TheycanbeFinnsorforeignersalike.
The next part will analyze the marketing strategy of each restaurant. It is worth
mentioningagainthedistinguishedcharacteristicofservicemarketing:intheservice
business, marketing is a supporting part of the production process because the
product is consumedat thepointofproduction (Grove, Fisk,& John,2000,p.59).
Among the “7Ps” of service marketing mix, five elements called “Product, Place,
Process,PhysicalEvidence,andParticipants”occur intheproductionprocess–also
called“production-consumptionpoint”(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,
p.15).Onlytwoelementsofthem,“PriceandPromotion”,canbedonebeforethis
production-consumptionpoint(Davis,Lockwood,Alcott,&Pantelidis,2012,p.15).
Bothmanagersstatedthattheyhavedonealotofmarketing.Theirapproachesare
quitesimilar.
Onerestaurantfocusesmainlyonthemarketingelementsthathappenatthetimeof
consumption. For themanager, the quality of food product is the first priority. It
referstothe“Product”element.Accordingtohim,itisthequalityoffoodthatmakes
![Page 49: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
47customers come again. He strongly emphasized on the role of word of mouth
marketing.Heputitinthisway:“itisthetastethatwilldoitforyouifyoumakeit
well”and“customers, theyaremarketing forus”.The secondpriority isplacedon
the“Participants”,namelythestaff.Itisimportanttohaveagoodspiritbetweenthe
staffandthecustomers,accordingtothemanager.Thestaffthenshouldbepolite,
friendly, and not too formal. Moreover, the manager concentrates on building a
long-term relationship with customers. By talking and asking feedback from
customers all the time,hehas already createda good connectionwith customers.
Accordingtohim,Finnishcustomersusuallydoonlyfewtalking.However,theylike
tobeaskedabouttheiropinionsandfeelingsafterthemeal. It isnotpoliceto just
serve the foodand leave thecustomersalone.Themanagerhasdevelopedsucha
goodrelationshipwithcustomerthatusuallytheyactivelycalltherestauranttoask
aboutthecomingbuffet/tastingdayorwhateventswillhappeninthenextmonth.
Furthermore,thediningroomisdesignedinawaythatitgivesawarm,cozyandnot
so formal impression for customers. This belongs to “Physical Evidence” in the
marketingmix.Itcomesaltogetherwiththegoodfoodandfriendlystaffinorderto
create such ameal experience for customers: a relaxingmealwith enjoyable food
serving by friendly staff in a warm and cozy place. That experience is the most
effectivewayofmarketing,accordingtothemanager.
Furthermore,thelocationoftherestaurantisadvantageous.Itissituatedinthecity
center and surrounded by hotels so it is more likely to be visited. That adds an
advantageof “Place” to theirmarketingmix. The “Price” is kept reasonable to the
qualitytheyoffer,andthiselementisnotofanyuseforthemarketingpurpose.As
for “Promotion”, themanager focuses on onlinemarketing. The restaurant has its
own website both in Finnish and English, which presents a user-friendly and
attractive interface. It also has a Facebook page,which remains quite high traffic.
Apart from that, the restaurant has not invested in magazines, television, or any
otherkindsofadvertising.Thisstrategyofmarketinghasbeenappliedsincetheyear
2006,whichhasgraduallygainedtherestaurantitsreputationoftoday.
Asfortheotherrestaurant,themanagerholdsthesameopinionaboutmarketingin
therestaurantbusinessthatthetasteandqualityoffoodisthemostimportantthing
thatkeepscustomerscomingback.Forthe“Participants”element,themanageralso
![Page 50: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
48aimstocreateafriendlyimpressionaidedbytheservingstaff.Inaddition,thespeed
ofserviceistakenintoaccount.Itshouldneitherbetooslownortoospeedysothat
customerscanfeelrelaxed.Themanageralsofocusesonbuildingalongrelationship
withcustomersinasimilarway:bytalkingtothemandaskingfeedbacksfromthem
frequently. Many customers have stayed with the restaurant for years. They are
usuallyveryeagertotellthemanagerwhatisdonewellornotsowell.Thatbuilta
verygoodcustomerbasefortherestaurant,accordingtothemanager.However,itis
alsoachallengesometimesforhimtodealwithdifferentkindsofcustomers,which
forces him to be versatile about what to offer. Besides, the dining room, which
belongs to “Physical evidence”, is designed in a plain, classical style so that the
scenery from windows is highlighted. These pieces come together to create a
relaxingandpleasantmealexperienceinaslowandclassicalstyle.
Furthermore, the restaurant strongly relies on its outstanding location – a “Place”
element.Thelocationisactuallysowellknownthatthefameofthelocationattracts
customersandvisitors to theplace. For tourists, it is almosta “must-see”place to
visit. This factor is one of the core advantages of the restaurant. Similarly to the
otherrestaurant,the“Price”elementisnottakenintoconsiderationasamarketing
tool.However,the“Promotion”parthasbeengivenmoreconcern.Themanagerhas
done printed advertising and mailed advertising. Nevertheless, the more focus is
giventosocialmediaandonlinemarketing.Themanagerexplainedthatcustomers
are now more likely to visit the Internet using their laptops, tablets, and
smartphones. Therefore, it is crucial to capture their attentionon theseplatforms.
He also plans to have a director of marketing in the near future. The marketing
strategy of the restaurant will be pushed more aggressively towards online
advertisements.
4.7 QualityManagement
Quality management is a procedure that has to be done everyday in both
restaurants. The typical food quality check process includes faulty inspection of
delivered raw material, taste checking when the food is ready, visual check by
waiters/waitresses,andfeedbacksfromcustomers.Amongthesesteps,thefeedback
from customers is the most critical part. Normally, the recommendations and
![Page 51: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
49complaintsfromcustomersarecollectedthroughoutthedayandcheckedoutinthe
eveningattheendoftheday.Thefeedbacksarethensortedoutandhandledbythe
managerandtheteam.Thequalityofserviceisalsocheckedoutbyobservationand
customerfeedbacks.However,itislessofconcern.Itappearedthatbothmanagers
placefullytrustintheirstaffandquiteconfidentabouttheirperformance.
4.8 Finance
Intermsoffinance,onemanageremphasizedonthetaskofplanning.Accordingto
him,autumnisoftenthetimetomakeplanfornextyear.Menus,events,marketing,
expenditure,theamountofpersonnel,workinghoursneeded,andother issuesare
taken intoconsideration.Theplanshouldbe flexibleandup tochanges though. In
addition,heusesasoftwaresystemofanalysisbasedonrecordeddatafrommany
years before. This system is used to forecast sales andexpenditure for the future.
Otherwise,themanagerdidn’tmentionanyothertask.
Theothermanagertalkedaboutthefinancesideofhisrestaurantasa“struggle”.It
iscausedbysomeobjectivefactorssuchasthehighcostoflabor,thehighfoodtax,
andremarkablyhightaxofwineinFinland,namedbythemanager.
Discussingabouttheimpactoftheeconomicrecession,onemanagerstatedthathis
restaurant has survived andmaintained quitewell thanks to the hardwork of the
team.However,ithashadcertainnegativeeffectsundeniably,notonlyonthesales
figuresbutalsoinotheraspects,forexampleforcinghimtopostponeinvestments.
Theothermanager,ontheotherhand,wasquitepessimisticaboutthesituation,as
therecessionhasbeencontinuingforalmosteightyearsdespitethetheoryof“seven
leanyears,sevenfatyears”,statedbyhim.
4.9 Customers
Along the interviews, bothmanagers provided a lot of knowledge and perception
about Finns and Finnish customers. According to one manager, it has been
researchedthatFinnsoftengotorestaurants forabout threeor four timesayear.
They are more fond of eating out at lunch. In general, Finnish people go to
restaurants only when they have something to celebrate because of the normal
![Page 52: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
50perceptionthatrestaurantsareofluxury.Theyusuallygotorestaurantsinoccasions
suchasbirthdays, anniversariesornational celebrationdays;otherwise they come
forbusinessreason.However,peopleofthenewgenerationgotorestaurantsmore
often nowadays. They also expect the restaurants to provide some sort of
entertainment, for example showsormusic. These customers are very demanding
indeed, according to him. About the time and duration of the meal, Finnish
customers often comebetween six andnineo’ clock in the evening,while foreign
customersoften comeaftereight. Typically Finnishusually sit andeat foroneand
halfanhourwhileforeigngroupmaysitforthreehours.
Furthermore, according to the other manager, Finnish people are very weather
driven.Whentheweatherisfavorable,theyliketogoout.Whentheweatheriscold,
rainingorsnowing,theyprefertostayathome.Itisdifferentfromothercultures,in
whichpeopleoften seek fornice food,niceatmosphereandgoodcompany toget
out of the house, pointed out by the manager. Another characteristic of Finnish
customers is that they are very honest.Whenever themanager asks for feedback
fromcustomers,theyspeakthetruthaboutthefoodwhethertheylikeordislikeand
whatshouldbeimproved.Thatinformationisextremelyhelpfultothemanagerfor
improving the restaurant practices. Besides, Finnish customers actually like to be
asked about their feelings and opinions of the food after themeal. It is seen as a
goodwaytogainrapportandmaintainagoodrelationshipwithcustomers.
5 DISCUSSION
5.1 Answerstotheresearchquestions
The purpose of the study was to find out possible hypotheses about the critical
factors that contribute to the success of full-service restaurants in Finland. Two
restaurant managers were interviewed with a same set of questions designed
according to the themes based on the theoretical framework developed by the
author. The interviews were transcribed and each transcript was broken into
statements that captured the information relevant to the study. Based on the
statements, the author compared and contrasted the data and presented them
![Page 53: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
51according to themes. From that, theauthor createdapointof view toanswer the
researchquestionsasfollows.
Theresearchquestionistofindoutcriticalsuccessfactorsforfull-servicerestaurants
inFinland.Basedonthe interviews, itcanbeconcludedthatthefirsttwoessential
elementsthatmakeafull-servicerestaurantsucceedarethequalityoffoodproducts
andthequalityofservice.Thesearefundamentalandindispensable.Eachelementis
builtupbyagroupofcertaincriticalfactors,whichwillbepresentedasfollows.
Relating to the foodproducts, thereare several important factors thatplay critical
roles in theproductionofgoodquality food.The first factor istheability toobtain
the right volumeof regular, fresh, and seasonal productswithdesired level quality
andhighlevelofconsistency.Thisfactorcreatesthefirmfoundationforarestaurant
business.Thesecondfactorisbeingdemandingaboutthetasteandkeeprenovating
recipes to achieve better combination. This is the main process that keeps the
businessgoingandgrowingovertime.Thelastfactorisdoingcautiousinspectionin
purchased raw material and always taste-checking before serving the food. This
functions as a checking system in order to control and maintain the quality
standards.
Inordertoprovideahighqualityofservice,themostimportantfactoristheability
to obtain potentialworkforce.While getting the right people is the highest aim, a
flexible approach should be applied in order to copewith the high turnover rate.
There are also possibilities that training and personal development can improve
customer orientation of the staff. Moreover, it is crucial that managers have the
ability tomaintain long –term relationships and good connectionswith customers.
Thisfactoriscrucialforbuildingupareliablecustomerbaseforthebusinessandfor
utilizingword ofmouthmarketing.Moreover,managers are also required to have
the ability to understand customer psychology and update new food trend in
restaurantbusiness.Thishelpsthemtodesignmoreappropriateserviceandimprove
practiceovertime.Thelastfactor istogainproximitytocustomersandhightraffic
location.Withoutthisfactor,itisveryhardforarestauranttoreachcustomersdue
tothesparsepopulationinFinland.
Allthequality–relatedfactorsmentionedaboveareconjunctivekeysuccessfactors.
This means that they are the necessary skills and resources for achieving high
![Page 54: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
52performanceinthemarket.Thedegreeofacquiringtheseskillsandresourcesalways
relatestotheperformanceofthebusiness,andtheycannotbecompensatedforby
progressinanyotherarea.
Apart from them, the last factor can be considered to be the third element of a
successfulrestaurantbusiness.Itisadistinguishedstrategyfromcompetitors.While
thisfactorbarelyinfluencesthequalityoffoodandservice,itprovidesdirectionsfor
the organization for transforming these values into competitive advantages. Only
then can the business maintain its competitiveness in the market and keep on
attracting customers. This factor is categorized as a compensatory success factor.
Thisreferstotheskillsandrecoursesthatabusinesscanchoosetoemphasizeonto
anyextent,andtheycanbecompensatedforbyhigherperformanceinotherareas.
Furthermore, all factors mentioned above demand continuous practices, great
accumulationofexperienceandeffort,andconstantinvestmentthroughalongtime
periodinordertoachieve.Hencetheycanbeconsideredtohavelowchangeability.
Changeability refers to how fast it is for a business to attain particular skills or
resources.Theloweritisthemorepermanentwillbethecompetitiveadvantagesfor
the business owners. Therefore, maintaining excellent performances in these key
factors are likely to create sustainable competitive advantages for a restaurant
businessinthelongrun.
5.2 Managerialimplications
My findings from the result respond to the study’s researchquestionsandhelp to
achieve its goals, which were to identify critical success factors in a full-service
restaurant in Finland. These findings have several implications for decision-making
andstrategicthinkingrelatedtorestaurantmanagementpractice.
Newrestaurantownersormanagerscanrelatetothefindingsoftheresearchasa
referencetoidentifypotentialcriticalfactorstotheirrestaurants’performance.From
that,theycandecidefromthebeginningwhichareastofocusonorhighlyinvestin.
Thishelpsthemtosetgoalsandcreateastrategyasastartingpoint.
For restaurateurs andmanagers who already have experienced in the field, these
researchfindingscanbeutilizedasachecklistforthemtoreflectontheirbusiness.
![Page 55: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
53They can assess their business performance according to these factors and relate
thattothefinancialresultsoftheunit.Fromtheevaluation,theymightfindoutnew
insightsaboutwhatareasshouldbe improvedandhowto improve them.Thiscan
alsobeusedasmaincriteriatoanalyzestrengthsandweaknessesofcompetitors.
The research findings also benefit people whose professions relate to restaurant
business, such as food suppliers, cooks, and restaurant trainees. It helps them to
understand more about the operation of a restaurant and critical points in the
process so that they can utilize that knowledge to achieve their purpose. For
instance, the study can provide food suppliers some understanding about the
demandandphilosophyofrestaurateurssothattheycanimprovetheirnegotiation
skill or provide better service. The same benefit can come to cooks, restaurants
trainees, and waiters/waitresses who are looking for jobs or already work in
restaurants.
5.3 Limitations
There are a few limitations of the study that need to be addressed as
recommendationforfutureresearch.Firstofall,thisstudyislimitedinscopedueto
thesmallamountof interviews,even though it canprove its representativeness.A
muchlargeramountofinterviewswouldhelptowidenthescopeandperhapsreveal
interestingcomparablefindingsthatcanbroadenandvalidatethefindingfactorsof
the research. More research is needed for achieving results that would be more
generalizableforthetopic.
Another limitation is the language barrier. The author cannot speak Finnish so all
interviewswereconducted inEnglish.Thismighthave leadto informationnotfully
presented,misunderstoodcontextormisleadingcommunicationfrombothsides in
the interviews. Consequently, it caused the author difficulties in interpreting
statements in theanalyzingprocess.This couldhavedonebetter if theauthor can
communicate in Finnish language, which would have helped her to communicate
better with the interviewees and understand more precisely the content of the
interviews.
![Page 56: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
545.4 Futureresearchsuggestions
Thestudyhasprovidedcertaincriticalsuccessfulfactorsforafull-servicerestaurant.
Theresultsofthestudycanbevalidatedbymorequalitativeresearchonthesame
topicinrestaurantssituatedindifferentpartsofFinland.Thescopeofthestudycan
also be broadened by qualitative research in the context of other countries.
Furthermore,thesefindingscanprovidehypothesestobetestedusingquantitative
methodology.Theaimmightbetodevelopandvalidateatheoreticalmodelforthe
subject.Asurveystudy,forexample,couldconsistofaclose-endedquestionnaireas
the measurement instrument. A survey study has an advantage of being able to
enormously increasethesamplesizeandthusprovidea largeenoughdatabasefor
statisticalanalyses.The resultof thecurrent studycan thenbeused to informthe
developmentofthequestionnaireitems.
![Page 57: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
55REFERENCESAhonen,T.(2014).AboutFigaroRestaurant&Winebistro.Retrieved1019,2015,fromFigaroRestaurant&Winebistro:http://en.figaro.fi/intro/
Ahonen,T.(2014).VuodenViiniravintola2012.Retrieved1019,2015,fromFigaroRestaurant&Winebistro:http://www.figaro.fi/ajankohtainen/
Akers,H.(NA).MajorSegmentsoftheRestaurantIndustry.Retrieved819,2015,fromSmallBusiness:http://smallbusiness.chron.com/major-segments-restaurant-industry-25986.html
Appannaiah,H.,Krishna,D.G.,Raghavan,H.,&Reddy,P.(2010).ServicesManagement.Mumbai:HimalyaPublishingHouse.
Armistead,C.G.(1985).CapacityManagement.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustryandthePublicSector(pp.109-114).JohnWiley&Sons.
Armistead,C.G.(1985).DesignofServiceOperations.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustryandthePublicSector(pp.40-60).Chichester,GrearBritain:JohnWiley&Sons.
Armistead,C.G.(1985).MaterialManagement.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector(pp.235-242).JohnWiley&Sons.
Armistead,C.G.(1985).QualityManagement.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector.JohnWiley&Sons.
Armistead,C.G.,&Voss,C.(1985).OperationsControl.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector(pp.131-136).JohnWiley&Sons.
Armistead,C.G.,&Voss,C.(1985).QueuingSystemsDesignandManagement.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector(pp.217-226).JohnWIley&Sons.
Balachandran,S.(2004).Customer-drivenservicesmanagement(2nded.).ResponseBooks.
BalancedScorecardInstitute.(2015).BalanceScorecardBasics.RetrievedAugust26,2015,fromBalancedScorecardInstitute:http://balancedscorecard.org/Resources/About-the-Balanced-Scorecard
Ban,V.(2012).AnalysisoftheUpscale/FineDiningSectorintheRestaurantIndustry.Johnson&WalesUniversity.MBAStudentScholarship.
Bateson,J.(1984).PerceivedControlandtheServiceEncounter.WorkshoponResearchinServiceBusiness.Aix-en-Provence:Institutd'AdministrationdesEntreprises.
Booms,B.H.,&Bitner,M.J.(1981).MarketingStrategiesandOrganizationalStructuresforServiceFirms.InJ.H.Donnelly,&W.R.George(Eds.),MarketingofServices(pp.47-51).Chicago:AmericanMarketingAssociation.
Brennen,B.(2013).QualitativeResearchMethodsforMediaStudies.NewYork:Routledge.
![Page 58: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
56Bullen,C.V.,&Rockart,J.F.(1981).Aprimeroncrtiticalsuccessfactors.Cambridge:MA:CenterforInformationSystemsReserach,MIT.
Campbell-Smith,G.(1989).MarketingoftheMealExperience:AnfundamentalApproach.UniversityofSurreyPress.
Chase,R.(1978).Wheredoesthecustomerfitinaserviceoperation?HarvardBusinessReview(56),137-142.
Creswell,J.W.(2007).QualitativeInquiryandResearchDesign(2nded.).London:SAGEPublications.
Davis,B.,Lockwood,A.,Alcott,P.,&Pantelidis,I.(2012).FoodandBeverageManagement(5thed.).NewYork:Routledge.
Day,G.S.,&Wensley,R.(1988).Assessingadvantage:Aframeworkfordiagnosingcompetitivesuperiority.JournalofMarketing(52),1-20.
Deming,W.(1982).Quality,ProductivityandCompetitivePosition.Massachusetts:MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology,CenterforAdvancedEngineeringStudy.
Denzin,N.K.,&Lincoln,Y.S.(2005).TheSageHandbookofQualitativeResearch(3rded.).ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.
EuromonitorInternational.(2015,June).Full-serviceRestaurantsinFinland.RetrievedAugust31,2015,fromEuromonitorInternational:http://www.euromonitor.com/full-service-restaurants-in-finland/report
Flick,U.(2014).TheSAGEhandbookofqualitativedataanalysis.SAGE.
Grönroos,C.(1998).MarketingServices:TheCaseofaMissingProduct.JournalofBusinessandIndustrialMarketing(13),322-338.
Grönroos,C.(2000).ServiceRefelctions:ServiceMarketingComesofAge.InT.A.Swarts,&D.Iacobucci(Eds.),HandbookofServicesMarketing&Management.SagePublications,Inc.
GrouponWorks.(2013,August2).GrouponWorks.RetrievedSeptember3,2015,fromHowtoMarketaFineDiningRestaurant:https://www.grouponworks.com/articles/food-drink/marketing-food-drink/public-relations-marketing-food-drink/how-to-market-a-fine-dining-restaurant/
Grove,S.J.,Fisk,R.P.,&John,J.(2000).ServicesasTheater:GuidelinesandImplications.InT.A.Stewarts,&D.Iacobucci(Eds.).SagePublications,Inc..
Grunert,K.G.,&Ellegaard,C.(1992,October).TheConceptofKeySuccessFactors:TheoryandMethod.RetrievedAugust21,2015,fromhttp://pure.au.dk/portal/files/32299581/wp04.pdf
Häkkinen,C.-R.(Ed.).(2010).ControlledEntertainment-TheFinnishrestaurantinthe20thcentury.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromElektraHelsinki:http://elektra.helsinki.fi/sillanpaasum.pdf
Halla,T.(2014,1211).RuotsipäihittääSuomenmatkailu-jaravintola-alanmyynnissä.Retrieved513,2015,fromMaaseudunTulevaisuus:http://www.maaseuduntulevaisuus.fi/politiikka-ja-talous/ruotsi-
![Page 59: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
57p%C3%A4ihitt%C3%A4%C3%A4-suomen-matkailu-ja-ravintola-alan-myynniss%C3%A4-1.76924
Helsinginhotelli-jaravintolamuseo.(2003).RavintolakulttuurinhistoriaSuomessa.(J.Juvonen,Editor)Retrieved513,2015,fromSinunsavo:http://www.sinunsavo.fi/suomen-ruokakulttuurin-historiaa/5-ravintolakulttuurin-historia-suomessa
Hotelli-jaravintolamuseo.(2003).Anniskeluravintolatmuotoutuivatvuosikymmentenaikana.(R.Järvinen,Editor)Retrieved513,2015,fromsinunsavo:http://www.sinunsavo.fi/suomen-ruokakulttuurin-historiaa/3-anniskeluravintolat-muotoutuivat-vuosikymmenten-aikana
Howell,M.,&Prevenier,W.(2011).FromReliableSources:AnIntroductiontoHistoricalMethods.NewYork:CornellUniversityPress.
Huuskonen,A.(2015,August24).Producerpricesformanufacturedproductsfellby1.1percentfromJulylastyear.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromStatisticsFinland:http://www.stat.fi/til/thi/2015/07/thi_2015_07_2015-08-24_tie_001_en.html
InternationalLabourOrganization.(2010).Developmentsandchallengesinthehospitalityandtourismsector.GlobalDialogueForumfortheHotels,Catering,TourismSector.1,p.5.Geneva:InternationalLabourOrganization.
Jacquelyn,L.(2001).RestaurantsandFiveOtherFoodBusinesses.EntrepreneurPress.
Johnston,R.(1985).OperationsStrategy.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector(pp.269-274).JohnWiley&Sons.
Kangassalo,P.(2015,June29).RisingtrendofeconomicatmospherepeteredoutinJune.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromStatisticsFinland:http://www.stat.fi/til/kbar/2015/06/kbar_2015_06_2015-06-29_tie_001_en.html
Kaplan,R.S.,&Norton,D.P.(1996).TheBalancedScorecard:TranslatingStrategyintoAction.Boston:HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.
Kaplan,R.S.,&Norton,D.(1996,January-February).UsingtheBalancedScorecardasaStrategicManagementSystem.HarvardBusinessReview,75-85.
Kim,W.C.,&Mauborgne,R.(2009,May).BlueOceanStrategy.HarvardBusinessReview.
LeCompte,M.D.,&Goetz,J.P.(1982).Problemsofreliabilityandvalidityinethnographicresearch.Reviewofeducationalresearch(52),31.
Levitt,T.(1972,September-October).Productionlineapproachtoservice.HarvardBusinessReview.
LonelyPlanet.(2014,815).RestaurantsinJyvaskyla.Retrieved1019,2015,fromLonelyPlanet:http://www.lonelyplanet.com/finland/jyvaskyla/restaurants
Matkailu-jaRavintolapalvelutMaRa.(2013,318).Matkailu-jaravintola-alanpainoarvoSuomessakasvaa.Retrieved513,2015,fromOpetin:http://www.opetin.fi/matkailu-ja-ravintola-alan-painoarvo-suomessa-kasvaa/
Matkailu-jaRavintolapalvelutMaRa.(2014).Ravintolaruoanverotus.Retrieved511,2015,fromMARA:https://www.mara.fi/ruokamyynti-ravintoloissa/
![Page 60: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
58McCarthy,E.J.(1960).BasicMarketing:AManagerialApproach(Vol.III).(R.D.Irwin,Ed.)Homewood.
Merriam.(1988).Casestudyineducation:Aqualitativeapproach.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
Miles,M.B.,&Huberman,A.M.(1994).QualitativeDataAnalysis.ThousandOaks,California:Sage.
Miles,M.B.,&Huberman,A.M.(1984).QualitativeDataAnalysis:AsourcebookofNewMethods.ThousandOaks,California:Sage.
Miles,M.B.,&Huberman,A.M.(1994).Qualitativedataanalysis:Anexpandedsourcebook(2nded.).ThousandOaks,California:Sage.
Mintzberg,H.(1990).Strategyformation:Schoolsofthought.InJ.W.Fredrickson,Perspectivesonstrategicmanagement(pp.105-236).GRandRapids:Harper.
Morris,B.(1985).HumanResourceManagement.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustryandthePublicSector(pp.81-84).JohnWiley&Sons.
Numminen,M.(2015,1016).VuodenviiniravintolalöytyyJyväskylästä.Retrieved1022,2015,fromViinilehti:https://viinilehti.fi/2015/10/vuoden-viiniravintola-loytyy-jyvaskylasta/
Parmenter,D.(2010).KeyPerformanceIndicators(KPI):Developng,Implementing,andUsingWinningKPIs(2ndEditioned.).JohnWiley&Sons.
Pelkonen,A.(2013,417).RuokajaMatkalu.Retrieved513,2015,fromRavintola-alamullistunutviimevuosikymmeninä:https://ruokajamatkailu.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/ravintola-ala-mullistunut-viime-vuosikymmenina/
Petersen,B.(1991).Towardauniformtaxonomyofsuccessfactors.Copenhagen:CopenhagenBusinessSchool.
Porter,M.E.(1980).Competitvestrategy.NewYork:FreePress.
Porter,M.E.(2008).HowCompetitiveForcesShapeStrategy.InM.E.Porter,OnCompetition(UpdatedandExpandeded.).Boston:HarvardBusinessSchoolPulishing.
Porter,M.E.(1998).TheCompettiveAdvantageofNations(2ndEditioned.).NewYork:FreePress.
Remes,T.(2015,August25).Unemploymentrate8.4percentinJuly.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromStatisticsFinland:http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/2015/07/tyti_2015_07_2015-08-25_tie_001_en.html
Sasser,W.,Olsen,R.,&Wyckoff,D.(1978).ManagementofServiceOperations.Boston:AllynandBacon.
SousadeVasconcelloseSá,J.A.,&Hambrick,D.C.(1989).Keysuccessfactors:Testofageneraltheoryinthematureindustrialproductsector.StrategicManagementJournal(10),367-382.
![Page 61: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
59Strauss,A.,&Corbin,J.(1990).Basicsofqualitativeresearch:Groundedtheoryproceduresandtechniques.NewburyPark:CA:Sage.
SuomenHotelli-jaRavintolaliittoSHRry.(2004).TOIMIALAVUOROPUHELU–HOTELLI-,RAVINTOLA-JAMATKAILUTOIMIALA.
Tegelberg,K.(2015,41).Ravintola-alaeitarvitsetukiaisia.Retrieved513,2015,fromSavonmaa:http://www.savonmaa.fi/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9228:ravintola-ala-ei-tarvitse-tukiaisia&catid=4:paikallisuutiset&Itemid=3
Thompson,A.,M.A.,P.,Gamble,J.,&Strickland.(2011).CraftingandExecutingStrategy:TheQuestforCompetitiveAdvantage,ConceptsandCases(18thed.).NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
Thompson,J.(1967).OrganizationsinAction.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
TrendsinFineDining.(2011).Restaurant,Food&BeverageMarketResearchHandbook.
Uuttu,A.(2015,August27).Wageandsalaryearners'earningsroseby1.2percentinAPril-June.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromStatisticsFinland:http://www.stat.fi/til/ati/2015/02/ati_2015_02_2015-08-27_tie_001_en.html
Varjonen,J.(2013,March20).Whereandwhendoweeat?RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromStatisticsFinland:http://www.stat.fi/artikkelit/2012/art_2012-09-24_008.html?s=0
Vihmo,J.(2014).Kotimainenkysyntäväheneeedelleen.Matkailu-jaRavintolapalvelutMaRary.Matkailu-jaRavintolapalvelutMaRary.
Vihmo,J.(2015).Kotimainenkysyntäväheneeedelleen.RetrievedAugust24,2015,fromMaRa:http://www.mara.fi/site/attachments/suhdannekatsaus.pdf
Voss,C.(1985).SiteLocation.InC.Voss,C.Armistead,B.Johnston,&B.Morris,OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector.JohnWiley&Sons.
Voss,C.,Armistead,C.,Johnston,B.,&Morris,B.(1985).OperationsManagementinServiceIndustriesandthePublicSector.Chichester,GreatBritain:JohnWiley&Sons.
Wallace,C.,&Forte,G.(2008).Theprofessionalpersonalchef:thebusinessofdoingbusinessasapersonalchef.JohnWiley&Sons.
Wickford,H.(2012,810).TheAverageLifeSpanofaRestaurant.Retrieved1018,2015,fromAzcentral:http://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/average-life-span-restaurant-6024.html
WorldwideTax.(2015).FinlandV.A.Tandothertaxes.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromWorldwideTax:http://www.worldwide-tax.com/finland/fin_other.asp
Yin,R.K.(2003).CaseStudyResearch:DesignandMEthods.CA:ThousandOaks:Sage.
Yle.(2014,August6).Finland'srestaurantssuffergrowinglosses.RetrievedAugust30,2015,fromYleUutiset:http://yle.fi/uutiset/finlands_restaurants_suffer_growing_losses/7395883
Zorn,T.(2005,105).DesigningandConductingSemi-StructuredInterviewsforResearch.Retrieved1017,2015,fromUtahEducation:http://home.utah.edu/~u0326119/Comm4170-01/resources/Interviewguidelines.pdf
![Page 62: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
60
APPENDICES
Appendix1.Listofcodes
Theme CodeGeneral GenStrategy StraMarketing MrkMenu MnuInventory InvProduction&Control ProQualityManagement QuaStaff StfFinance FinCustomers CusEnvironment(Industry&Macro) Env
![Page 63: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
61Appendix2.Interviewquestions
Theme Code QuestionGeneral Gen Whatarethedutiesofarestaurantmanager? Gen Iftherearesomemainfactorsthatcontributetoyour
successtoday,whatcomestoyourmind? Gen Do you intend to focus on any special area? If yes,
whicharea? Gen Isthereanyfieldthatyouwanttoimprove?Why?Strategy Stra Howisthecompetition? Stra Whatmakesyoudifferentfromyourcompetitors? Stra Whycustomersshouldchooseyouinsteadofthem? Stra Doyouhaveastrategy?Whatandhowimportant is
it?Marketing Mrk Whatkindofcustomersdoyoutarget? Mrk Howdocustomersknowaboutyou? Mrk Doyouinvestalotinmarketing?Why? Mrk Howhaveyoutriedtoreachcustomers?
Mrk Howlongdoesittakeforyoutogainyourreputationastoday?
Menu Mnu What kindofmeal experiencedo youaim to createforcustomers?
Mnu Howspecialisyourmenu? Mnu Doyouupdateorrenovateyourrecipes?Howoften? Mnu Aretheremanychangesgoingoninpricesorrecipes?Inventory Inv What difficulties do you encounter when managing
inventory? Inv Howdifficultisittofindthesuppliers?Why? Inv Do you have problems in purchasing fresh/seasonal
products?Production &Control
Pro Howdoyoumonitortheproductionprocess?
Pro Doyouhaveproblemwithcapacity? Pro Whatisthebiggestobstacleinproductionprocess?QualityManagement
Qua Howcanyouensurethequalityofthefood?
Qua Howcanyouensurethequalityoftheservice?Staff Stf Whatisthechallengeinmanagingstaff? Stf Isthishardtorecruittherightpeople? Stf Howdoyoumonitortheirperformance?Howdoyou
knowthattheyaredoingagoodwork?
![Page 64: Key success factors in full-service restaurants in Finland · The approach of the research is to identify key success factors from both perceived and actual views, and on that basis](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022050104/5f43274c45f9d21e1d4af513/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
62Finance Fin Howisthefinancialside?Isitcomplex? Fin Howcanyoumeasureyourfinancialperformance? Fin Howaboutthefinancialplanning?Environment Env Wehavebeenthroughtheeconomiccrisis.Howhave
itaffectedyourbusiness? Env The government has introduced a new labor
regulation recently about reducing the number ofholiday and Sunday wage and so on. Will it affectyourrestaurant?