king final report
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
1/111
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
2/111
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
3/111
iii
CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... v
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... vii
NOMENCLATURE ....................................................................................................... viii
GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................... ix
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................... x
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... xi
1. Theory .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Coordinate System ............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Twist Parameters ................................................................................................ 4
1.3 Stress, Strain, and Displacement for a Cantilever Beam ................................... 5
1.3.1 Stress Equilibrium .................................................................................. 6
1.3.2 Strain-Displacement Relationships ........................................................ 8
1.3.3 Stress-Strain Relationships .................................................................. 10
1.4 Generic Cantilever Beam Stress, Strain, and Displacement Solutions ............ 11
1.4.1 Functionally Varying Moment of Inertia ............................................. 13
1.4.2 Discontinuous Shear Stress Solution for a Rectangular Beam ............ 18
1.4.3 General Stress Distribution for a Twisted Cantilever Beam ................ 21
1.4.4 General Strain Distribution for a Twisted Cantilever Beam ................ 22
1.4.5 General Vertical Displacement of a Twisted Cantilever Beam ........... 23
1.5 Specific Theoretical Solution ........................................................................... 32
2. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Model ...................................................................... 38
2.1 Methodology .................................................................................................... 38
2.2 Analytical Results ............................................................................................ 41
2.2.1 Tensile Stress and Strain Values (x-Direction) .................................... 43
2.2.2 Shear Stress and Strain Values (xy-Direction) ..................................... 47
2.2.3 Vertical Displacement (y-Direction) .................................................... 51
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
4/111
iv
3. Comparison of Beam Theory Formulation Results to FEA Results.......................... 54
3.1 Displacement Values ........................................................................................ 54
3.2 Maximum Tensile Stress Values ...................................................................... 57
3.3 Maximum Shear Stress Values ........................................................................ 58
4. Summary and Conclusion .......................................................................................... 60
5. Appendix ATheoretical Results at SelectedxValues ........................................... 62
6. Appendix BFEA Results at SelectedxValues ...................................................... 67
7. Appendix CABAQUS Input File (.inp) ................................................................. 72
8. References ................................................................................................................ 100
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
5/111
v
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Example of a Twisted Cantilever Beam ........................................................... 1
Figure 290 Twisted Cantilever Beam in thexy-Plane .................................................. 2
Figure 390 Twisted Cantilever Beam in theyz-Plane .................................................. 3
Figure 4 -xyzAxes vs. ABC Axes .................................................................................... 4
Figure 5Arbitrary Beam Cross-Section Subjected to Bending Moment Mz(x)............. 6
Figure 6 - Rotation of Axes and Moment of Inertia ........................................................ 13
Figure 7 - Moment of Inertia Variation within the Twisted Region of a Rectangular
Beam ................................................................................................................................ 17
Figure 8 - Point of Discontinuity in Shear Stress ............................................................ 19
Figure 9 - Width and Thickness Parameters of the Solution ........................................... 32
Figure 10 - Load and Length Parameters of the Solution ................................................ 32
Figure 11 - Midplane Shell of the ABAQUS FEA Model .............................................. 38
Figure 12 - Meshed View of the ABAQUS FEA Model ................................................. 39
Figure 13 - Load and Boundary Conditions of the ABAQUS FEA Model ..................... 40
Figure 14 - FEA Shell Model, Variation of Principal Axes ............................................ 42
Figure 15 - FEA Tensile Stress at the Shells Midplane................................................. 44
Figure 16 - FEA Tensile Stress at the Shell's Positive Face ............................................ 45
Figure 17 - FEA Indicates an Additional Compressive Stress Peak in Twisted Region,
Shells Positive Face........................................................................................................ 45
Figure 18 - FEA Tensile Stress at the Shell's Negative Face .......................................... 46
Figure 19 - FEA Indicates an Additional Tensile Stress Peak in Twisted Region, Shells
Negative Face .................................................................................................................. 46
Figure 20 - FEA Shear Stress Distribution at the Shell's Midplane ................................ 47
Figure 21 - FEA Shear Stress Concentration at Shell's Midplane ................................... 48
Figure 22 - FEA Shear Stress Distribution on Shells Positive Face.............................. 49Figure 23 - FEA Shear Stress Distribution on Shells Negative Face............................. 50
Figure 24 - FEA Displacement Results, Isometric View ................................................ 51
Figure 25 - FEA Displacement Results,xy-Plane ........................................................... 51
Figure 26 - FEA Displacement Results,yz-Plane ............................................................ 52
Figure 27 - FEA Indicates Residual Stiffness and Non-planar Cross-Section atx=x4.. 53
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
6/111
vi
Figure 28 - Theory vs. FEA, Vertical Displacement ....................................................... 54
Figure 29 - Theoretical Displacement Results vs. Beams of Constant Cross-Sectional
Orientation ....................................................................................................................... 56
Figure 30 - Theory vs. FEA, Maximum Tensile Stress ................................................... 57
Figure 31 - Theory vs. FEA, Maximum Shear Stress ...................................................... 58
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
7/111
vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Summary of FEA Input Parameters ................................................................. 40
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
8/111
viii
NOMENCLATURE
For the following symbols, ij. Units are in parenthesis.
E - Modulus of Elasticity (psi)
- Strain Tensor (in/in)
ii - Extensional Strain (in/in)
ij - Tensor Shear Strain (in/in)
F - Force Applied to the Free End of the Cantilever Beam (lbs)
G - Shear Modulus (psi)
- Engineering Shear Strain (in/in)
Iii - Moment of Inertia (in )
Iij - Product of Inertia (in )
- Curvature (in-
)
L - Length (in)
M - Moment (in-lb)
- Poissons Ratio (dimensionless)
- Stress Tensor (psi)
ii - Tensile Stress (psi)
t - Thickness of the Rectangular Cross-Section, Less than its Width, w (in)
ij - Shear Stress (psi)
- Angular Measurement Between theBand Y-Axes or the CandZ-Axes (radians or degrees)
u - Longitudinal Displacement (in)
v - Vertical Displacement (in)
w - Transverse Displacement, Only Applicable to Section1.3.2 (in)
w - Width of the Rectangular Cross-Section, Greater than its Thickness, t (in)
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
9/111
ix
GLOSSARY
ABAQUS -A software application used for both the modeling and analysis of
mechanical components and assemblies (pre-processing) and
visualizing the finite element analysis results (post-processing).
Cantilever Beam-
A projecting beam that is supported at one end and carries a load at
the other end or along its length.
Cartesian Coordinate System -A coordinate system comprised of three mutually orthogonal axes to
represent three-dimensional space.
Deflection - A movement of a structural member resultant of an applied force.
Displacement - See deflection.
Equilibrium - A state in which opposing forces or influences are balanced.
FEA - An acronym for Finite Element Analysis.
Final Orientation - The cross-sectional orientation of the beam in the region beyondL2.
Global Axes -The coordinate system that remains constant throughout the length
of the beam and whose origin is at the fixed end of the beam.
Hooke's Law - A law stating that the strain in a solid is proportional and linearly-related to the applied stress within the elastic limit of the solid.
Initial Orientation - The cross-sectional orientation of the beam from its origin to L1.
Isotropic - Having uniform physical properties in each direction.
Local Axes -The coordinate system that remains perpendicular to the perimeter
of the beams cross-section and whose origin varies to satisfy this
perpendicularity.
Midpoint Rule -Computes an approximation to a definite integral, made by finding
the area of a collection of rectangles whose heights are determined
by the values of the function.
Modulus of Elasticity -The proportionality constant relating a solids extensional strain
value(s) to its longitudinal stress value(s) within the elastic region.
Moment of Inertia - A measurement that quantifies a beams ability to resist bendingabout a particular axis.
Origin -The point in three-dimensional space where all three Cartesian axes
are coincidient, e.g.x =y =z = 0.
Poisson's Ratio - The negative ratio of transverse strain to axial strain.
Product of Inertia -A measurement that quantifies a beams ability to resist shear
deformation about a particular axis.
Shear Modulus -The proportionality constant relating a solids shear strain value(s)
to its shear stress value(s) within the elastic region.
Strain -The ratio of total deformation to the initial dimension of the
material body in which the forces are being applied.
Stress - A measure of the internal forces acting within a deformable body.
Twisted Cantilever Beam - A cantilever beam whose cross-section remains constant, but isrotating about its centroid along the beams length.
Varying Orientation - The cross-sectional orientation of the beam in the region of L1toL2.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
10/111
x
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I would like to thank my fianc, Jessica Rowe, for her unwavering support,
encouragement, and affection during my graduate studies.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
11/111
xi
ABSTRACT
Twisted cantilever beams are defined here as beams whose rectangular cross-sectional
orientation changes along the beams length with respect to global axes. These beams
have a twisted or spiral-type geometric feature somewhere along their length. This
project will formulate solutions for twisted cantilever beams in static bending using
classical beam theory, compare the results to numerical solutions, and discuss
inconsistencies.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
12/111
1
1.Theory1.1 Coordinate SystemThe analytical case of interest is a rectangular cantilever beam in static bending with an
abrupt, 90 twist, like that shown inFigure 1. The beam is rigidly affixed at one end,
preventing any displacements or rotations at that end. The geometric center of the beam
at the affixed end will be defined as the originor the point at which all coordinates
(x,y,z) are equal to zero. Cartesian coordinates will be used in these solutions because
traditional cantilever beams in bending have documented analytical solutions in
Cartesian coordinates as well. Note that the placement of the axes shown in Figure 1
does not place the vertex at the analytical origin.
Figure 1 - Example of a Twisted Cantilever Beam
Moving away from the rigid attachment at (0,0,0), parallel to the length of the beam will
be defined as: moving in the x-direction, defining the x-axis. The direction of the
y-axis is orthogonal to the x-axis and is chosen to be parallel to one side of the beams
cross-section at the origin. The z-axis is orthogonal to both the x and y-axes. These
three axes whose origin occurs at the beams geometric center, at the fixed end, are
defined as the global axes.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
13/111
2
Moving down the beams length, away from the rigid attachment, in thex-direction, the
beam initially has a homogeneous moment of inertia and its initial orientation. At
some distance, denoted by L1, the beams cross-section begins to rotate about its x-axis,
but its moment of inertia remains continuous, where it can be described as having a
varying orientation. The beams cross-section continues to rotate until it reaches
another distance, denoted by L2, where the rotation stops but again, the moment of
inertia remains continuous. BeyondL2, the beams final orientation continues until it
reaches its free end, whose distance from the origin is denoted by the length L3. For the
case of a 90 twist, the final orientation is rotated 90 from the initial orientation. See
Figure 2 andFigure 3.
Figure 290 Twisted Cantilever Beam in the xy-Plane
Y
XO
L3
L2
L1
F
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
14/111
3
Because the cross-sectional orientation of the beam is varying along its length between
L1andL2, another set of axes are defined in order more easily express twist parameters
and cross-sectional orientations. These local axes are also Cartesian, but are denoted
(A,B,C) instead of (x,y,z). The origin of the local axes is not necessarily at the same
location as that of the global axes, but can be anywhere along the beams length,
provided that the A-axis remains collinear with thex-axis. At the beams fixed end, at
its geometric center, the A-axis is collinear with the x-axis, the B-axis is collinear with
the y-axis, and the C-axis is collinear with the z-axis. Once the beams cross-section
begins to rotate (at L1) the B and C-axes develop an angular measurement greater than
zero between their global counterparts (y and z, respectively). The A-axis and x-axis
will alwaysremain collinear, and either can be used interchangeably. SeeFigure 4.
Figure 390 Twisted Cantilever Beam in the yz-Plane
Y
Z
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
15/111
4
It is important to describe and define the parameters within the beams varying
orientation (L1 x L2), because these parameters will contribute to the analytical
solutions that are eventually formulated. The difference between the cross-sections at
x =L1andL1xL2can be quantified by the angular difference, , between theyand
B-axes or thezand C-axes. The rate of twist can then be defined as the change in angle,
, over the change in length betweenL1andL2, or .1.2 Twist ParametersFor the problem to be solved, the cross-sectional orientation can be described as: [1] [2]
[3]
Let (x)be a linear function of x, so that the rate of twist from L1 to L2 is a constant
value. Then, by the equalities given by equations[1] through[3]:
Figure 4 - xyzAxes vs. ABC Axes
Z
Y
B
C
Z
Y
B
C
[xand A-axes both coming out of the page. ]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
16/111
5
Substituting the boundary conditions in the expression for yields: Solving for the constants M and N, and subtracting these equalities gives:
The function (x)can then be written as:
[4]So, the rate of twist is: [5]Rewriting equation[1] through[3] with equation[4]: [6]
[7] [8]Together, equations [6] through [8] fully describe the beams twist parameters and can
be derived using the valuesL1andL2.
1.3 Stress, Strain, and Displacement for a Cantilever BeamBecause the cantilever beam of interest has a functionally varying cross-sectional
orientation along its length, the stress distribution throughout the beam must be solved
for a generic case first so that the twist parameters developed in section 1.2 can be
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
17/111
6
applied. Let a beam of arbitrary cross-section be subjected to a bending moment,Mz(x),
about thez-axis, which is a function of longitudinal (x) position only. The origin of the
cross section is at the beams centroid, and the yandz-axes are the principal axes. See
Figure 5.
1.3.1 Stress EquilibriumAs a result of the applied load, F, and subsequent moment,Mz(x), the beam experiences
displacements, strains, and a state of stress. Each can be represented by a tensor at each
point throughout its volume. The generic stress tensor, [], is given by:
[9]
In order to satisfy equilibrium, the stress tensor must be symmetric such that:
Figure 5Arbitrary Beam Cross-Section Subjected to Bending Moment Mz(x)
Z
Y
[Xand A-axes both coming out of the page. ]
Arbitrary
Cross-Section
Mz(x)
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
18/111
7
Because stresses can be related to displacements (as will be shown in following
discussion), and because the displaced shape of an end-loaded cantilever beam is similar
to that of a beam in pure bending, it is reasonable to assume that the cantilever beam has
a stress tensor similar to that of a beam in pure bending. Beginning with the bending
moment,Mz(x):
[10] [11]
[12]
That is, the normal stresses, ii, and thex-zandy-zshear stresses,xzand yz, are identical
to those for a beam in pure bending, but no specific assumptions are made about the
other shear stress, xy, only that it is some function ofx,y, andz.
The equations of 3-D stress equilibrium with no body forces are now noted to augment
the discussion and simplify the equations above:
[13]
[14] [15]
Based on equations[10] through [12], equations [13] and [14] reduce to:
[16] [17]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
19/111
8
Equations [16] and [17] make up the 3-D stress equilibrium equations for a cantilever
beam experiencing plane stress. Upon inspection, one can see that equation [17] is only
satisfied if xyis constant in thex-domain. Rewriting equations[10] and[11] for clarity,
equation [12] can be simplified to:
[18] [19]
[20]
1.3.2 Strain-Displacement RelationshipsAs mentioned, the beam also experiences a state of strain. The generic stress tensor, [],
is given by:
[21]where iiare normal strains and ijare shear strains.
The strain tensor is symmetric, such that:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
20/111
9
For small deflections (where sin ), the following expressions relate strain to
displacement:
[22]
[23] [24]
[25]
[26]
[27]Engineering shear strain is related to tensor shear strain by:
Rewriting equations [22] through [27], the components of the strain tensor, [], are:
[28] [29] [30]
[31] [32] [33]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
21/111
10
1.3.3 Stress-Strain RelationshipsFor an isotropic, linear-elastic material (obeying Hookes Law), the stress-strain
relationships are as follows:
[34] [35]whereEis the modulus of elasticity and G is the shear modulus. The two modulii are
related through Poissons Ratio, , by the following:
[36]
For each component of the strain tensor, the relationships are:
[37]
[38]
[39] [40] [41]
[42]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
22/111
11
1.4 Generic Cantilever Beam Stress, Strain, and DisplacementSolutions
Equation [18] indicates that the normal stress in the x-direction is dependent on the
bending moment, Mz(x), which is a function of x. This bending moment is simply the
force,F, multiplied by the distance from the origin, and can be written as:
[43]So, the normal stress in thex-direction is:
[44]Substituting equation [44] in thex-direction stress equilibrium equation ([16]) gives: [45]Integrating equation [45]:
Pis a constant of integration and can be determined on the basis that in order to satisfy
boundary equilibrium around the perimeter of the beam, the shear force must be equal to
zero at these points.
The total stress distribution is now repeated for clarity:
[46] [47] [48]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
23/111
12
The strains at each point can be found directly from the resultant stresses, by inserting
equations [46] through [48] into equations [37] through [42]. Inserting equation [46]
and [47] into the stress-strain relationships (equation [37]), and that into the strain-
displacement relationship (equation [22]) leads to a noteworthy:
[49]Equation [49] can be integrated in x to solve for the longitudinal displacement of the
beam, once the function ofIzzis known.
For small strains and displacements in the elastic range, and assuming that plane sections
remain plane, the curvature of the beams neutral surface can be expressed in the
following form: where is the curvature. Inserting equation [43] gives: [50]Equation [50] is a second-order linear differential equation, and is the governing
equation for the elastic curve. The product EI is the flexural rigidity of the beam.
Because the moment of inertia,Izz, varies with respect tox, it must be first formulated in
order to integrate equation [50] and solve for the vertical displacement.
Up to this point, each parameter of the stress, strain, and displacement components is
known except the moment of inertia about the neutral axis, Izz, and the constant of
integration, P, for the shear term. This moment of inertia and P are derived in the
following discussion.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
24/111
13
1.4.1 Functionally Varying Moment of InertiaConsider the plane area shown inFigure 6below. The moments and product of inertia
with respect to the local BC-axes are:
[51] [52] [53]
The same forms of expressions exist for the global coordinate system, in xyz-
coordinates.
The moments and product of inertia in the BC-plane are constant values, equal to those
of the yz-plane at the origin. However, as the angular measurement increases, the
moments and product of inertia in the yz-plane change. To obtain these quantities, the
coordinates of the differential element dA are expressed in terms of theyz-coordinates as
follows:
Figure 6 - Rotation of Axes and Moment of Inertia
Arbitrary
Cross-Section
C
B
dA
BdA
CdA
y
z
Z
Y[xand A-axes both coming out of the page. ]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
25/111
14
[54]
[55]
Substituting these values in equations [51] through [53] gives:
Using the following trigonometric identities, the form of IYY, IZZ, and IYZ can be
simplified.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
26/111
15
These are complicated expressions in their most reduced form, unlike the simple and
familiar (for example). However, if the general expressions for momentsand product of inertia in the localcoordinate system (equations [51], [52], and [53]) are
substituted in the above integrals, they take on a more practical form.
[56]
[57]
[58]IYY,IZZ, andIYZare the moments and product of inertia in the global coordinate system at
any point along thex-axis, andIBB,ICC, andIBCare the moments and product of inertia in
the local coordinate system.
With the moments and products of inertia defined as such, the reader is referred back to
Figure 2 to be reminded of the cross-sectional orientation at the origin. Specifically, for
this problem, the local moments and product of inertia are the same as those of a
rectangular cross-section in bending, whereICCis the strong axis of bending andIBBis
the weak axis of bending at the origin. The limits of integration are defined by the
beams perimeter. Thus:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
27/111
16
[59]
[60]
[61]where wis the width of the beam, and tis the thickness.
For any symmetric cross-section whose centroid is at the origin,IBCwill be zero, so anyterms containing the beams localproduct of inertia will drop out of equations [56], [57],
and [58]. Substituting equations [59] through [61] into these equations gives:
By substituting in the relationship between andx(see equations[6], [7],and[8]),
these equations yield the full form of the functionally varying moments of inertia.
[62]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
28/111
17
[63]
[64]
Taking (for example) values of t =0.25 and w = 1.00, the moments and product of
inertia change in the twisted region of the beam as shown inFigure 7below:
Figure 7 - Moment of Inertia Variation within the Twisted Region of a Rectangular Beam
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
29/111
18
1.4.2 Discontinuous Shear Stress Solution for a Rectangular BeamThe stress distributions will be solved to eventually formulate the strain and
displacement solutions. However, the shear stress, xy, still has an undefined constant,P,
which must be found to fully formulate the stress in the beam. As stated in section1.4.1,
Pis a constant of integration that can be determined on the basis that in order to satisfy
boundary equilibrium around the perimeter of the beam, the shear force must be equal to
zero at these points. But because the beams cross-section is rotating, this constant is
also related to the twist parameters forL1xL2.
For the beams initial orientation:
Substituting this value into equation [48] gives:
[65]
For the beams final orientation:
Substituting this value into equation [48] gives:
[66]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
30/111
19
For the beams varying orientation, the y-coordinate of the beams outermost fiber is
constantly changing. This coordinate is needed to solve the shear stress distribution in
this region. The perimeter of the beam can be represented by four straight lines whose
orientation varies with the x-position, or . Because the perimeter edges intersect one
another at right angles, however, the function of the outermost y-coordinate will not be a
continuous function. The function changes when they-axis coincides with the corner of
the beams cross-section. For any rectangular beam, this occurs at an angle of . SeeFigure 8.
For the varying orientation, where 0arctan(t/w), they-coordinate of the outermost
fiber of the beams cross-section is:
Z
Y
w
t
= arctan (t/w)
Figure 8 - Point of Discontinuity in Shear Stress
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
31/111
20
Substituting this value into equation [48] and using the relationship between and x
(equation [7]) gives:
[67]
Similarly, for the varying orientation, where arctan(t/w)/2, they-coordinate of
the outermost fiber of the beams cross-section is:
Substituting this value into equation [48] and using the relationship between andx
(equation [7]) gives:
[68]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
32/111
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
33/111
22
1.4.4 General Strain Distribution for a Twisted Cantilever BeamInserting equations [69] through [74] into the stress-strain relationships given by
equations [37] through [42]:
AnyOrientation: [75]
Any
Orientation: [76]
Any
Orientation: [77]
Initial
Orientation:
[78]
Varying
Orientation:
[79]
Varying
Orientation:
[80]
Final
Orientation:
[81]
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
34/111
23
1.4.5 General Vertical Displacement of a Twisted Cantilever BeamNow that the moment of inertia,Izz, has been derived, equation [50] can be integrated to
obtain the y-displacement function. However, because Izz is dependent upon the
longitudinal position, x, the vertical displacement function must be dissected into three
conditional equations, depending on the magnitude of x. The first solution presented
will be for the case of . Because this x-location is within the initialorientation and the moment of inertia is constant in this region, equation [50] is
integrated twice inx, as would be done for a normal cantilever beam with constant cross-
section:
where C1is a constant of integration. Integrating again inxgives:
The constants of integration, C1 and C2 can be determined by applying the boundary
conditions of the beam. At the fixed end,
, the displacement and the slope of the
beam are equal to 0. Therefore, . So, for the region of : [82]The displacement function for x values in the varying orientation becomes more
complicated, however. For values ofxwhere , the moment of inertia cannotbe considered constant and excluded from the integrals, as was done above. Inserting
the equality forIzzinto equation [50], for values ofxwhere , and integratingonce with respect toxgives:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
35/111
24
The second term of they-displacement slope solution (above) indicates an inherent flaw
in the application of classical beam theory to this problem. Even a simplified version of
the function does not stay within the real domain; the varying moment ofinertia functions presence in the denominator complicates the solution beyond any
reasonable point.
Because the solution is beyond the scope of this document, a piecewise approximation is
instead presented using the midpoint rule. If the second term above is broken into many
separate intervals, the integral can be carried out by approximating the value of x for
each separate interval. That is, the distance from L1to L2will be divided byNnumber
of divisions, and the average longitudinal value between each point will be used in place
ofx. The midpoint rule is defined as:
The midpoint of each interval is equal to the variable xn, where N is the number of
predefined intervals chosen:
Because the midpoint rule is only needed for values of xwhere , the valueof a is already known and equal to L1. Likewise, the value of b will be set to x.
Therefore, the second term of the exact y-displacement slope solution can be
approximated as:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
36/111
25
In this form, the first term of the exact solution can be solved directly, and the second
term can be approximated. Of course, as , the function will converge to the exactsolution, but in this form it is much easier to deal with. Thus, the slope of the beam,, for can be written as:
The constant of integration, C3, can be determined by applying the boundary condition
provided by equation [82]: at ,
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
37/111
26
Rewriting the expression for the slope of the beam in the region of :
To solve for the displacements, the equality above must again be integrated in x.
However, the second term again creates problems and yields solutions of non-real
numbers. Thus, the midpoint rule must be applied a second time. Let the second term
above be defined as an arbitrary function ofx,(x), so that:
Integrating the second term using the midpoint rule gives:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
38/111
27
There have certainly been more elegant expressions derived in engineering. Writing the
total solution fory-displacement when
gives:
The constant of integration, C4, can be found by using equation [82] at :
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
39/111
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
40/111
29
The constant of integration, C5, can be determined by recalling the function derived for
the beams slope between , and inserting :
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
41/111
30
The slope of the beam for can then be written as:
Notice that in this region only one term of the beams slope is dependent on x. This
simplifies things much more than before when deriving the beams deflection in the
varying orientation. That is, all integrals henceforth can be computed directly, and no
more approximations are needed. To solve for they-displacement, the equality above is
integrated inxto give:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
42/111
31
The final constant of integration can be determined by the boundary condition:
at
. Therefore,
(from equation [83]).
[84]
Equations [83] and [84] are very complicated and tedious to carry out in real
applications. A less cumbersome method is to use the equation of the beams slope,, and integrate the numerical value(s) over x, rather than carrying through to aclosed-form solution. This method will be used to obtain values in section 1.5 and in
Appendix A.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
43/111
32
1.5 Specific Theoretical SolutionAdvancing from the generic case, the specifics of the problem are now defined and solved.
Figure 9 shows the beams cross-section at two distinct points and assigns its width (w)
and thickness (t). Let these values be 1.0 and 0.25, respectively. Figure 10 is arepetition ofFigure 2,but assigns values to the applied force,F, and lengthsL1,L2, andL3.
Let the material properties of the beam be those of mild steel (ms):Figure 10 - Load and Length Parameters of the Solution
Y
XO
7.5
4.5
3
10 lbsFigure 9 - Width and Thickness Parameters of the Solution
Z
Y
w
t
Z
Y
w
t
[Initial Orientation]
[Final Orientation]
w= 1.0
t= 0.25
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
44/111
33
For comparison to numerical results, the stress, strain, and displacement values at five
distinct values ofxwill be found. These fivex-locations are as follows:
corresponds to the start of the twist,
corresponds to the midpoint of the beam and
its twist feature, corresponds to the end of the twist, and corresponds to the end ofthe beam. In addition, at eachxvalue the stress, strain, and vertical displacement valueswill be formulated for three values ofy, corresponding to the positive/negative outermost
beam fiber y value, and at , the neutral axis. The following solution is that of . The analytical results for all other points can be found in Appendix A.In thebeams local coordinates, the moments and products of inertia are:
For and the moment of inertia,IZZ, is:
(See equation [55]).
Therefore, the stress distribution for and is:
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
45/111
34
In tensor form:
The strains at and can be found by inserting these values into thestress-strain relationships, given by equations [37] through [42]:
The vertical displacement at this point is found using the slope equation that, when
integrated inx, gives equation [83]. Because the value ofx= 3.75 lies in the region of . For the following solution, letN= 5.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
46/111
35
To extract a vertical displacement from the beams slope at this point, is simplyintegrated again inxwith the appropriate limits:
The constant of integration, C7, is determined by the boundary condition provided by the
beams vertical displacement in its initial orientation.
At (from equation [82]),
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
47/111
36
The very outer-most beam fiber that lies on the y-axis is derived in section1.4.2,and is
given by the equality:
Since at , the outer-most beam fiber on they-axis is: For and the stress distribution is:
In tensor form:
The strains at
and
can be found by inserting these values into
the stress-strain relationships, given by equations [37] through [42]:
The vertical displacement at this point does not depend on y, so it is the same as
previously calculated.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
48/111
37
For and the stress distribution is:
In tensor form:
The strains at and can be found by inserting these values intothe stress-strain relationships, given by equations [37] through [42]:
The vertical displacement at this point does not depend on y, so it is the same as
previously calculated.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
49/111
38
2.Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Model2.1 MethodologyTo compare and validate the theoretical results, the finite element analysis (FEA)
software ABAQUS was used. ABAQUS is a powerful software application used for
both the modeling and analysis of mechanical components and assemblies (pre-
processing) and visualizing the finite element analysis results (post-processing).
ABAQUS offers a variety of different modeling approaches for the formulation of a
cantilever beam problem. The user has the option of using 3D-continuum parts, shell
assemblies, axisymmetric models, planar parts, and many other choices. For this
particular problem, a shell assembly was created and meshed to generate S4R elements
(4-sided shell elements using reduced integration methods). This option was chosenbecause it most closely matches the theoretical results of a traditional cantilever beam,
without a twist feature.
First, the midplane shell geometry was created by extruding line-connectors to specific
datum planes. These datum planes represent thex-values chosen for examination of the
theoretical solutions. SeeTable 1 for the values ofxthat represent these datum planes.
The figure below shows the shell geometry created in ABAQUS to create an FEA model
of the twisted cantilever beam.
Figure 11 - Midplane Shell of the ABAQUS FEA Model
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
50/111
39
After the geometry was defined, the element was assigned a shell thickness ( t= 0.25)
and material properties (E = 30x106 psi, = 0.3) identical to those of the theoretical
solution in Section 1.5. The shell geometry was then meshed to form S4R elements,
with an approximate global seed size of 0.1. The seed size of the model determines the
coarseness of the mesh. ABAQUS generally selects an appropriate seed size based on
the number of elements it is able to process; with the student version of ABAQUS (used
herein), the number of elements is limited to 1,000.
It is possible to extrude the twisted region of the cantilever beam as one element,
however,Figure 11 above shows that it was created with two separate elements. This
was done to force the meshing to generate element points at the x = 3.75 point. This is
useful in that point results at the middle of the twist feature can later be extracted,
instead of using points nearby and approximating. Figure 12,below, shows the meshed
model of the twisted cantilever beam.
Figure 12 - Meshed View of the ABAQUS FEA Model
Finally, the root of the beam was fixed by creating an initial job step and setting all
displacement and rotations atx= 0 equal to zero (shown as orange cones inFigure 13).
A second job step was created to define the end-load on the beam. To avoid point
effects, a transverse shear, line-load on the far edge was used (shown as red arrows in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
51/111
40
the negative y direction in Figure 13). This model was submitted for analysis and
completed successfully.
Figure 13 - Load and Boundary Conditions of the ABAQUS FEA Model
Table 1 - Summary of FEA Input Parameters
Variable Value
L1 3
L2 4.5
L3 7.5
w 1.00
t 0.25
E 30 x 10 psi
0.3
F -10 lbs
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
52/111
41
2.2 Analytical ResultsExplicit numerical results for x values corresponding to those analyzed in Section 1.5
and Appendix A can be found in Appendix B. The model used for analysis is a shell
model whose thickness or normal direction defines the z-axis, therefore shear stressescannot be directly extracted from ABAQUS in the traditional manner. As shown in
Figure 14below, the models 2 and 3 axes (corresponding to the Band C-axes) evolve
over the length of the beam. Thus, the numerical results provided by ABAQUS
correspond to the stress states in the ABC-coordinate system (see Figure 4). A direct
comparison can be made to any x-direction values, but to compare shearing components
or any direction other than x, the values must be properly transformed into the global
coordinate system (xyz). To apply this transformation of results, the user must specify a
field output transformation option corresponding to the global axes (under
ResultsOptionsTransformation).
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
53/111
42
Figure 14 - FEA Shell Model, Variation of Principal Axes
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
54/111
43
NOTE:
The following graphical representations extracted from ABAQUS give stress, strain,
and displacement values in index notation. Therefore,
2.2.1 Tensile Stress and Strain Values (x-Direction)The midplane of the FEA model shows tensile stress values (xx) peaking at the fixed
end of the beam, as is the case for a traditional cantilever beam. It does not indicate any
specific stress-increasing effect induced by the twist feature. SeeFigure 15 for a view of
the tensile stress results at the midplane.
At the shell models positive face, however, ABAQUS shows a severe increase in
compressive stress as the beam approaches its final orientation. At the models negative
face, the same region indicates a severe increase in tensile stress. See Figure 16 and
Figure 17 for the tensile stresses at the positive face of the shell model andFigure 18 and
Figure 19 for the tensile stresses at the negative face of the shell model.
Because the relationship between stress and strain is linear (see equations [34] and [35])the graphical results of only stress are given. The strain distributions predicted by
ABAQUS are similar to their corresponding stress distributions, shown below.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
55/111
44
Figure 15 - FEA Tensile Stress at the Shells Midplane
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
56/111
45
Area of compressive stress peak
Figure 16 - FEA Tensile Stress at the Shell's Positive Face
Figure 17 - FEA Indicates an Additional Compressive Stress Peak in Twisted Region, Shells Positive Face
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
57/111
46
Area of tensile stress peak
Figure 18 - FEA Tensile Stress at the Shell's Negative Face
Figure 19 - FEA Indicates an Additional Tensile Stress Peak in Twisted Region, Shells Negative Face
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
58/111
47
2.2.2 Shear Stress and Strain Values (xy-Direction)Figure 20 shows the shear stress distribution of the shells midplane. Notice that the
initial orientation shows a parabolic distribution, as is the case of classical beam theory.
However, Figure 20 also shows that the shear stress has a negative shear stress
concentration at the origin, near the top and bottom fibers (the blue corners). This may
be attributed to point effects and discontinuity extrapolations generated by the numerical
integration routine of ABAQUS. Notice that just adjacent to these points, the shear
stress is positive, and more close to a zero value.
Figure 20 andFigure 21 also show that at the beams midpoint, in the middle of its twistfeature, there is a negative shear stress concentration. Again, note that there is a linear
relationship between stress and strain. Thus, only the distributions for stress are shown.
Figure 20 - FEA Shear Stress Distribution at the Shell's Midplane
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
59/111
48
The results of the positive and negative faces of the shell model indicate severe shear
stress concentrations after the twist midpoint and before the beams final orientation
begins. Most notably, there is a large increase in positive shear in the xy-plane. This
rebounds the color spectrum of the post-processor, and results in the rest of the beam
appearing as a constant shear value. This is not the case, however. The shear stress still
follows a parabolic distribution over the height of the beam, up to the twisted region.
See Figure 22 and Figure 23 for the shear stress distributions on the positive and
negative faces of the shell model.
Negative Shear Stress Concentration
Figure 21 - FEA Shear Stress Concentration at Shell's Midplane
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
60/111
49
Shear Stress Concentrations
Figure 22 - FEA Shear Stress Distribution on Shells Positive Face
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
61/111
50
Shear Stress Concentrations
Figure 23 - FEA Shear Stress Distribution on Shells Negative Face
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
62/111
51
2.2.3 Vertical Displacement (y-Direction)Figure 24 through Figure 26 below show the twisted cantilever beams displacement
distribution. Note that inFigure 26,there is a positive zdisplacement at the end of the
beam. This feature indicates shear coupling within the layers of the shell, which is not
addressed by classical beam theory.
Figure 24 - FEA Displacement Results, Isometric View
Figure 25 - FEA Displacement Results, xy-Plane
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
63/111
52
When viewing the rotational displacements about the x-axis, an interesting point arises:
the twist feature seems to have imposed a structural anomaly in the beam at the end of its
twist, at x = x4. The displacements across the beams width at the end of the twist
(z-direction) follow a parabolic distribution. Classical beam theory suggests that vertical
displacements are independent of this direction. Looking at regions far from this point
(x4), the rotations about the x-axis disappear, corresponding to traditional theory. At
z
Figure 26 - FEA Displacement Results, yz-Plane
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
64/111
53
x=x4, however, the outer edges of the beam have a higher residual stiffness than the
centerline, and experience smaller displacements. SeeFigure 27.
x4= 4.5
Figure 27 - FEA Indicates Residual Stiffness and Non-planar Cross-Section at x= x4
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
65/111
54
3.Comparison of Beam Theory Formulation Results to FEAResults
3.1 Displacement ValuesThe vertical displacement functions derived in section1.4.5 show the closest correlation
to FEA results. Equation [82] matches the displacements calculated by ABAQUS
almost exactly. Equation [83] does a reasonable job up to the end of the twist but
beyond this (Equation [84]), predicts a slightly stiffer beam. Figure 28 shows the
displacements of the beam as calculated in this document and by FEA. Notice that each
method plots a smooth, cubic displacement function along the beams length.
Figure 28 - Theory vs. FEA, Vertical Displacement
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
66/111
55
Overall, it is shown that for vertical displacements, classical beam theory can be applied
to cantilever beams with functionally varying moments of inertia to obtain reasonable
results. The percent difference of the beams vertical deflection at the end of the beam
(x= 7.5) using beam theory is only 4.5% different than the value predicted by FEA.
Classical beam theory (as applied in the derivation of theoretical values within),
however, does not account for out-of-plane displacements that may occur, as these are
resultant of shear-coupling and non-planar cross-sectional deformations. Figure 26
shows that FEA results predict out-of-plane displacements. Abiding by the key
assumptions of traditional beam mechanics (see section 1.3.1) forces one to discount
out-of-plane effects. In the case of a twisted cantilever beam, this may disregard key
aspects of the beams internal mechanics. Beam theory does not leaveroom for out-of-
plane displacements but does predict fairly accurate in-plane displacements when
compared to the results of FEA.
When compared to the analytical solutions for similar rectangular beams with constant
cross-sections (seeFigure 29), the vertical displacement curve of this particular twisted
cantilever beam seems to relate more closely to the beam experiencing strong-axis
bending, though this correlation will be a function of the length and twist parameters. If
the twist was closer to the fixed end of the beam (near x= 0), the displacement curve of
the twisted cantilever beam would be expected to more closely follow that of the
constant cross-section beam in weak-axis bending. Conversely, the closer the twist is to
the applied load (nearx=L3), the more closely the displacement curve would follow that
of the constant cross-section beam in strong-axis bending.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
67/111
56
Figure 29 - Theoretical Displacement Results vs. Beams of Constant Cross-Sectional Orientation
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
68/111
57
3.2 Maximum Tensile Stress ValuesThe theoretical values of tensile stress (xx) match the numerical results very well outside
of the beams twisted region. Within the twisted region,however, the ABAQUS model
generally predicts much higher values, and does not indicate maximum or minimums atexactly the same value of x. The FEA model also does not follow the smooth curve
based on trigonometric modifications of the moment of inertia in this region. At each
tensile stress maximum point, the theoretical value is 9% less than that of the numerical
solution. See Figure 30 for the maximum tensile stresses predicted by theoretical
methods and by numerical methods. The theoretical method, as presented herein, should
not be used to calculate maximum tensile stress within the varying-orientation region of
a twisted cantilever beam.
Figure 30 - Theory vs. FEA, Maximum Tensile Stress
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
69/111
58
3.3 Maximum Shear Stress ValuesAgain, beyond the twisted region, the theoretical stress values closely match the
numerical values. However, for the shear stress (xy), the FEA results vary greatly from
the theoretical results in the twisted region. Both methods allude to a maximum orminimum at the twists midpoint (x = 3.75), but the theoretical results appear to have an
inverted shape compared to those of the FEA shell model. SeeFigure 31.
The FEA model shows the shear stress peaking at the midpoint of the twist, but this
effect is not predicted by the application of classical beam theory. A possible
explanation is that, contrary to classical beam theory, plane sections are not remaining
plane under deformation (as shown by Figure 27). This effect would cause the shear
deformations to have a much greater impact on the distribution of flexural stresses
Figure 31 - Theory vs. FEA, Maximum Shear Stress
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
70/111
59
within the beam than calculated with traditional methods. Figure 31 shows the severity
of error in using traditional beam theory to calculate shear stresses with in the beams
twisted region.
For the application of failure criterion (such as von Mises, Tresca, maximum stress, etc),
the shear stress equations developed by this document would not accurately demonstrate
maximum shear stress values, and could lead to errors. However, both theoretical and
FEA models indicate a peak of sorts at the twists midpoint. To mitigate gross errors
and propagate conservatism, a scalar factor could be applied to the constant shear stress
values of the initial or final orientations formulated by traditional methods to estimate
the maximum shear stress at the midpoint of the twist. In this particular problem, the
scalar factor is approximately 8/3. Additional case studies of beam geometries should be
performed to confirm the validity of this value and method. Refining the tensile and
shear stress equations could be possible by using the methodology of Timoshenko,
where plane sections do not necessarily remain plane, as demonstrated in Chapter 12 of
Reference [d].
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
71/111
60
4.Summary and ConclusionBased on comparison of theoretical results to FEA results, application of classical beam
theory to twisted cantilever beams of rectangular cross-section is only useful in
calculating vertical displacement values, derived from the curvature of the beam at its
neutral surface. This approach is the beginning of the direct method. The vertical
displacement function developed correlates very well with FEA results. The theoretical
curve follows a smooth, negative-cubic shape along its length as would be expected with
a cantilever beam. However, classical beam theory does not leave room for deformation
coupling, non-planar cross-sections, and gives no method of solving for the out-of-plane
displacements that FEA predicts.
When the indirect method is used to calculate stresses and strains in the twisted region of
the cantilever beam, the results of this document demonstrate that classical beam theory
is not applicable. If the exact stress distribution was needed within the twisted region,
using the indirect method and classical beam theory would not predict reliable values.
The margin of error within the twisted region is too great to be safely applied to real
applications of twisted cantilever beams.
A possible explanation for the stress calculation error is that cross-sections of the beam
that begin plane are not remaining plane under load and subsequent displacement, which
is a critical assumption of classical beam theory. A non-planar section becomes evident
by studying the FEA rotational and displacement results at the end of the twist, presented
in Figure 27. Because the beams cross-section is being distorted as a result of the
applied load, a key stipulation of beam theory is obviously not being satisfied.
The theoretical stress and strain functions derived by this document are notrecommended for detailed analyses. However, based on the applied load and beam
geometry, the results presented herein suggest that the method of calculating vertical
displacement gives reasonable results. These displacement results could be applied to
the strain-displacement equations (section1.3.2), and then to the stress-strain equations
(section1.3.3)to approximatestress and strain values within the beams twisted region.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
72/111
61
Note that although the vertical displacement functions derived are very close to FEA
results, full application of the direct method to find stresses and strains will still be an
approximation. Under an applied load, FEA shows that the beam experiences out-of-
plane displacement. This z-displacement will contribute to the stress and strain
distribution throughout the beam, though its magnitude is much less than the vertical
displacements. Therefore, applying the direct method to calculate stresses will notyield
exact results, but could be used to estimate stress and strain values within the beams
twisted region.
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
73/111
62
5.Appendix ATheoretical Results at Selected xValuesx1
x= 0, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [71]) -60 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [78]) -2.600 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v(Equation [82]) 0.000 in
x= 0, y = 0.5
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 1,800 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [71]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 6.000 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [78]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v(Equation [82]) 0.000 in
x= 0, y = -0.5
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) -1,800 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [71]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) -6.000 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [78]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v(Equation [82]) 0.000 in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
74/111
63
x2x = 3.00, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [71]) -60 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [78]) -2.600 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [82]) -4.680 x 10-4
in
x = 3.00, y = 0.5
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 1,080 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [71]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 3.600 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [78]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [82]) -4.680 x 10-4 in
x = 3.00, y = -0.5
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) -1,080 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [71]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) -3.600 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [78]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [82]) -4.680 x 10-4
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
75/111
64
x3x = 3.75, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [73]) -14.12 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [80]) -6.118 x 10-7
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [83]) -7.297x 10-4
in
x = 3.75, y =
= 0.1768
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 599.0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [73]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 1.997 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [80]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [83]) -7.297x 10-4 in
x = 3.75, y = - = -0.1768Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) -599.0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [73]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) -1.997 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [80]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [83]) -7.297x 10-4
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
76/111
65
x4x = 4.50, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [74]) -60 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [81]) -2.600 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [84]) -1.382 x 10-3
in
x = 4.50, y = 0.125
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 2,880 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [74]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 9.600 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [81]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [84]) -1.382 x 10-3 in
x = 4.50, y = -0.125
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) -2,880 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [74]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) -9.600 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [81]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [84]) -1.382 x 10-3
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
77/111
66
x5x = 7.50, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [74]) -60 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [81]) -2.600 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [84]) -6.665 x 10-3
in
x = 7.50, y = 0.125
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [74]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [81]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [84]) -6.665 x 10-3 in
x = 7.50, y = -0.125
Tensile Stress, xx(Equation [69]) 0 psi
Shear Stress, xy(Equation [74]) 0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx(Equation [75]) 0 in/in
Shear Strain, xy(Equation [81]) 0 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v (Equation [84]) -6.665 x 10-3
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
78/111
67
6.Appendix BFEA Results at Selected xValuesx1
x= 0, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx -3.691 psi
Shear Stress, xy -62.26 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -1.096 x 10-11
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -3.676 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v 0.000 in
x= 0, y = 0.5
Tensile Stress, xx 1,717 psi
Shear Stress, xy -150.7 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx 5.527 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -1.306 x 10-5
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v 0.000 in
x= 0, y = -0.5
Tensile Stress, xx -1,719 psi
Shear Stress, xy -150.0 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -5.533 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy -1.300 x 10-5 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v 0.000 in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
79/111
68
x2x = 3.00, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx -204.8 psi
Shear Stress, xy -51.12 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -7.470 x 10-8
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -4.460 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -4.812 x 10-6
in
x = 3.00, y = 0.5
Tensile Stress, xx 818.1 psi
Shear Stress, xy 35.16 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx 3.225 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy -1.502 x 10-6in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -4.840 x 10-6 in
x = 3.00, y = -0.5
Tensile Stress, xx
-850.3 psi
Shear Stress, xy -68.46 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -3.230 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -1.453 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -4.840 x 10-6
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
80/111
69
x3x = 3.75, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx -9.876 psi
Shear Stress, xy -162.9 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -5.360 x 10-7
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -1.411 x 10-5
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -7.589 x 10-4
in
x = 3.75, y =
= 0.1768
Tensile Stress, xx 2,719 psi
Shear Stress, xy -852.9 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx 8.139 x 10-5in/in
Shear Strain, xy -7.471 x 10-5 in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -7.561 x 10-4 in
x = 3.75, y = - = -0.1768Tensile Stress,
xx
-2,576 psi
Shear Stress, xy -844.8 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -8.267 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -8.848 x 10-5
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -7.560 x 10-4
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
81/111
70
x4x = 4.50, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx -0.7396 psi
Shear Stress, xy -66.70 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -2.047 x 10-8
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -5.780 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -1.352 x 10-3
in
x = 4.50, y = 0.125
Tensile Stress, xx 2,929 psi
Shear Stress, xy -70.85 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx 9.758 x 10-5 in/in
Shear Strain, xy -6.052 x 10-6in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -1.352 x 10-3 in
x = 4.50, y = -0.125
Tensile Stress, xx
-2,930 psi
Shear Stress, xy -62.54 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -9.762 x 10-5
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -5.509 x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -1.352 x 10-3
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
82/111
71
x5x = 7.50, y = 0
Tensile Stress, xx 8.282 x 10-6
psi
Shear Stress, xy -58.87 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -5.136 x 10-6
in/in
Shear Strain, xy x 10-6
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -6.986 x 10-3
in
x = 7.50, y = 0.125
Tensile Stress, xx 47.86 psi
Shear Stress, xy 0.3965 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx 2.559 x 10-6 in/in
Shear Strain, xy 3.436 x 10-8in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -6.986 x 10-3 in
x = 7.50, y = -0.125
Tensile Stress, xx
-47.86 psi
Shear Stress, xy -0.3965 psi
Longitudinal Strain, xx -2.559 x 10-6
in/in
Shear Strain, xy -3.436 x 10-8
in/in
Vertical Displacement, v -6.986 x 10-3
in
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
83/111
72
7.Appendix CABAQUS Input File (.inp)*Heading
ProjectLoad
** Job name: TFBshell Model name: TFBshell*Preprint, echo=YES, model=YES, history=NO, contact=NO
**
** PARTS**
*Part, name=TFBshell
*Node1, 0.5, 0., 7.5
2, -0.5, 0., 7.5
3, -0.5, 0., 4.54, 0., 0., 4.5
5, 0.5, 0., 4.5
6, -0.353553385, 0.353553385, 3.757, 0.353553385, -0.353553385, 3.75
8, 0., 0.5, 3.
9, 0., 0., 3.10, 0., -0.5, 3.
11, 0., 0.5, 0.
12, 0., -0.5, 0.13, 0.400000006, 0., 7.5
14, 0.300000012, 0., 7.5
15, 0.200000003, 0., 7.516, 0.100000001, 0., 7.5
17, 0., 0., 7.5
18, -0.100000001, 0., 7.5
19, -0.200000003, 0., 7.5
20, -0.300000012, 0., 7.521, -0.400000006, 0., 7.5
22, -0.5, 0., 7.4000001
23, -0.5, 0., 7.3000001924, -0.5, 0., 7.19999981
25, -0.5, 0., 7.0999999
26, -0.5, 0., 7.
27, -0.5, 0., 6.9000001
28, -0.5, 0., 6.80000019
29, -0.5, 0., 6.69999981
30, -0.5, 0., 6.599999931, -0.5, 0., 6.5
32, -0.5, 0., 6.4000001
33, -0.5, 0., 6.30000019
34, -0.5, 0., 6.19999981
35, -0.5, 0., 6.099999936, -0.5, 0., 6.
37, -0.5, 0., 5.9000001
38, -0.5, 0., 5.8000001939, -0.5, 0., 5.69999981
40, -0.5, 0., 5.5999999
41, -0.5, 0., 5.542, -0.5, 0., 5.4000001
43, -0.5, 0., 5.30000019
44, -0.5, 0., 5.1999998145, -0.5, 0., 5.0999999
46, -0.5, 0., 5.
47, -0.5, 0., 4.900000148, -0.5, 0., 4.80000019
49, -0.5, 0., 4.69999981
50, -0.5, 0., 4.599999951, -0.400000006, 0., 4.5
52, -0.300000012, 0., 4.5
53, -0.200000003, 0., 4.5
54, -0.100000001, 0., 4.5
55, 0.100000001, 0., 4.5
56, 0.200000003, 0., 4.557, 0.300000012, 0., 4.5
58, 0.400000006, 0., 4.5
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
84/111
73
59, 0.5, 0., 4.5999999
60, 0.5, 0., 4.6999998161, 0.5, 0., 4.80000019
62, 0.5, 0., 4.9000001
63, 0.5, 0., 5.64, 0.5, 0., 5.0999999
65, 0.5, 0., 5.19999981
66, 0.5, 0., 5.30000019
67, 0.5, 0., 5.400000168, 0.5, 0., 5.5
69, 0.5, 0., 5.5999999
70, 0.5, 0., 5.69999981
71, 0.5, 0., 5.80000019
72, 0.5, 0., 5.900000173, 0.5, 0., 6.
74, 0.5, 0., 6.0999999
75, 0.5, 0., 6.1999998176, 0.5, 0., 6.30000019
77, 0.5, 0., 6.4000001
78, 0.5, 0., 6.579, 0.5, 0., 6.5999999
80, 0.5, 0., 6.69999981
81, 0.5, 0., 6.8000001982, 0.5, 0., 6.9000001
83, 0.5, 0., 7.
84, 0.5, 0., 7.099999985, 0.5, 0., 7.19999981
86, 0.5, 0., 7.3000001987, 0.5, 0., 7.4000001
88, -0.49759236, 0.0490085706, 4.40625
89, -0.490392804, 0.0975444019, 4.3125014390, -0.478470445, 0.145141393, 4.21875191
91, -0.461939752, 0.191341713, 4.125
92, -0.44096002, 0.235699534, 4.0312476293, -0.415734202, 0.277786046, 3.93749785
94, -0.386505216, 0.317196637, 3.84375
95, -0.282842726, 0.282842726, 3.7596, -0.212132037, 0.212132037, 3.75
97, -0.141421363, 0.141421363, 3.75
98, -0.0707106814, 0.0707106814, 3.7599, 0., 0., 3.75
100, 0.0707106814, -0.0707106814, 3.75
101, 0.141421363, -0.141421363, 3.75102, 0.212132037, -0.212132037, 3.75
103, 0.282842726, -0.282842726, 3.75
104, 0.386505216, -0.317196637, 3.84375
105, 0.41573438, -0.277785748, 3.93749857
106, 0.440960169, -0.235699236, 4.03124809
107, 0.461939752, -0.191341713, 4.125108, 0.478470564, -0.14514108, 4.21875238
109, 0.490392864, -0.0975440741, 4.31250191
110, 0.49759236, -0.0490085706, 4.40625111, -0.317196637, 0.386505216, 3.65625
112, -0.277785748, 0.41573438, 3.56250143
113, -0.235699236, 0.440960169, 3.46875191114, -0.191341713, 0.461939752, 3.375
115, -0.14514108, 0.478470564, 3.28124738
116, -0.0975440741, 0.490392864, 3.18749785
117, -0.0490085706, 0.49759236, 3.09375118, 0., 0.400000006, 3.
119, 0., 0.300000012, 3.120, 0., 0.200000003, 3.
121, 0., 0.100000001, 3.
122, 0., -0.100000001, 3.123, 0., -0.200000003, 3.
124, 0., -0.300000012, 3.
125, 0., -0.400000006, 3.
126, 0.0490085706, -0.49759236, 3.09375
127, 0.0975444019, -0.490392804, 3.18749857
128, 0.145141393, -0.478470445, 3.28124809
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
85/111
74
129, 0.191341713, -0.461939752, 3.375
130, 0.235699534, -0.44096002, 3.46875262131, 0.277786046, -0.415734202, 3.56250215
132, 0.317196637, -0.386505216, 3.65625
133, 0., 0.5, 2.9000001134, 0., 0.5, 2.79999995
135, 0., 0.5, 2.70000005
136, 0., 0.5, 2.5999999
137, 0., 0.5, 2.5138, 0., 0.5, 2.4000001
139, 0., 0.5, 2.29999995
140, 0., 0.5, 2.20000005
141, 0., 0.5, 2.0999999
142, 0., 0.5, 2.143, 0., 0.5, 1.89999998
144, 0., 0.5, 1.79999995
145, 0., 0.5, 1.70000005146, 0., 0.5, 1.60000002
147, 0., 0.5, 1.5
148, 0., 0.5, 1.39999998149, 0., 0.5, 1.29999995
150, 0., 0.5, 1.20000005
151, 0., 0.5, 1.10000002152, 0., 0.5, 1.
153, 0., 0.5, 0.899999976
154, 0., 0.5, 0.800000012155, 0., 0.5, 0.699999988
156, 0., 0.5, 0.600000024157, 0., 0.5, 0.5
158, 0., 0.5, 0.400000006
159, 0., 0.5, 0.300000012160, 0., 0.5, 0.200000003
161, 0., 0.5, 0.100000001
162, 0., 0.400000006, 0.163, 0., 0.300000012, 0.
164, 0., 0.200000003, 0.
165, 0., 0.100000001, 0.166, 0., 0., 0.
167, 0., -0.100000001, 0.
168, 0., -0.200000003, 0.169, 0., -0.300000012, 0.
170, 0., -0.400000006, 0.
171, 0., -0.5, 0.100000001172, 0., -0.5, 0.200000003
173, 0., -0.5, 0.300000012
174, 0., -0.5, 0.400000006
175, 0., -0.5, 0.5
176, 0., -0.5, 0.600000024
177, 0., -0.5, 0.699999988178, 0., -0.5, 0.800000012
179, 0., -0.5, 0.899999976
180, 0., -0.5, 1.181, 0., -0.5, 1.10000002
182, 0., -0.5, 1.20000005
183, 0., -0.5, 1.29999995184, 0., -0.5, 1.39999998
185, 0., -0.5, 1.5
186, 0., -0.5, 1.60000002
187, 0., -0.5, 1.70000005188, 0., -0.5, 1.79999995
189, 0., -0.5, 1.89999998190, 0., -0.5, 2.
191, 0., -0.5, 2.0999999
192, 0., -0.5, 2.20000005193, 0., -0.5, 2.29999995
194, 0., -0.5, 2.4000001
195, 0., -0.5, 2.5
196, 0., -0.5, 2.5999999
197, 0., -0.5, 2.70000005
198, 0., -0.5, 2.79999995
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
86/111
75
199, 0., -0.5, 2.9000001
200, 0.40867731, 0., 6.19405651201, -0.402668566, 0., 6.39775133
202, 0.405933738, 0., 5.29558468
203, 0.408387423, 0., 6.49111652204, 0.401252568, 0., 6.69411993
205, 0.396833479, 0., 6.90104437
206, 0.00177802215, 0., 7.40288019
207, -0.197118372, 0., 7.39842939208, -0.298042893, 0., 7.3983407
209, -0.400736928, 0., 4.99964094
210, 0.000279046595, 0., 4.59903193
211, 0.201234028, 0., 4.59916306
212, 0.403696954, 0., 4.99643135213, -0.402956039, 0., 5.09924746
214, 0.404304177, 0., 5.09595919
215, -0.405808479, 0., 5.19816256216, 0.40518558, 0., 5.19583607
217, -0.407385081, 0., 5.29740095
218, 0.406625658, 0., 5.39631796219, -0.406762481, 0., 5.59426737
220, 0.406653494, 0., 5.69659758
221, -0.40634349, 0., 5.89342594222, 0.407420099, 0., 5.99554634
223, -0.40429756, 0., 6.19505644
224, 0.409388989, 0., 6.29291248225, -0.403280675, 0., 6.49861288
226, -0.406411737, 0., 6.69895744227, -0.405461013, 0., 6.89886618
228, -0.400929481, 0., 7.0986414
229, -0.399379015, 0., 7.19837999230, -0.398801684, 0., 7.29853868
231, -0.100126587, 0., 4.59898329
232, -0.200560495, 0., 4.59896088233, -0.300716281, 0., 4.59911108
234, -0.400495023, 0., 4.59947872
235, 0.301283509, 0., 4.59913683236, 0.402510345, 0., 4.79805994
237, -0.407594681, 0., 5.3964119
238, -0.407321811, 0., 5.49507999239, 0.406856358, 0., 5.49654388
240, 0.406758994, 0., 5.59697676
241, -0.406829447, 0., 5.69340563242, -0.406897724, 0., 5.79300213
243, 0.406882733, 0., 5.79643965
244, 0.407251507, 0., 5.89637852
245, -0.405940652, 0., 5.99382353
246, -0.405343413, 0., 6.09392929
247, 0.408475012, 0., 6.09557915248, -0.403198481, 0., 6.29597473
249, 0.410051048, 0., 6.39194059
250, -0.404992044, 0., 6.59876156251, 0.406056046, 0., 6.59184217
252, -0.406782091, 0., 6.79884672
253, 0.397338152, 0., 6.7973218254, -0.403321207, 0., 6.99862671
255, 0.398649305, 0., 7.00376129
256, 0.102255292, 0., 7.40408039
257, 0.400675923, 0., 7.10461521258, 0.202405795, 0., 7.40403891
259, 0.302304924, 0., 7.40319681260, 0.40184623, 0., 7.20414352
261, 0.401590854, 0., 7.40185547
262, -0.0971012264, 0., 7.39980888263, 0.295431882, 0., 6.7917347
264, 0.100899935, 0., 4.59913445
265, -0.200336963, 0., 4.69831038
266, -0.400373787, 0., 4.79929972
267, -0.400186002, 0., 4.89960384
268, 0.302564979, 0., 4.69811058
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
87/111
76
269, -0.301119387, 0., 5.00126266
270, 0.314894289, 0., 5.4961009271, 0.314381897, 0., 5.79639339
272, 0.30728507, 0., 6.6842556
273, -0.301167935, 0., 7.09433603274, -0.296987951, 0., 7.1945982
275, -0.31428501, 0., 5.48812866
276, -0.313560694, 0., 5.98459959
277, 0.321501642, 0., 6.28869247278, 0.322397113, 0., 6.48214102
279, 0.298777401, 0., 7.00802946
280, 0.00669529289, 0., 7.30547333
281, 0.204572856, 0., 7.30841064
282, 0.303512573, 0., 7.3060894283, -0.399060756, 0., 7.39900494
284, 0.000929877104, 0., 4.69793987
285, 0.403036028, 0., 4.89737177286, 0.305870652, 0., 4.99487877
287, -0.306456804, 0., 5.10053301
288, 0.307883441, 0., 5.09456158289, -0.313620389, 0., 5.19682837
290, 0.310606509, 0., 5.19448519
291, 0.313224137, 0., 5.2947917292, -0.315620482, 0., 5.39094973
293, -0.312159777, 0., 6.08479261
294, 0.319978833, 0., 6.1921401295, -0.310105145, 0., 6.18633223
296, -0.307616264, 0., 6.2891984297, -0.30550006, 0., 6.39351463
298, -0.315976441, 0., 6.79735613
299, -0.307581723, 0., 6.99457979300, -0.296388656, 0., 7.29612589
301, -0.0996720865, 0., 4.69822311
302, -0.300613523, 0., 4.69879389303, -0.400424659, 0., 4.69941044
304, 0.401785314, 0., 4.6987381
305, -0.316448867, 0., 5.29398108306, 0.314912826, 0., 5.39621305
307, 0.314139575, 0., 5.59668589
308, -0.314390153, 0., 5.58593273309, -0.315074533, 0., 5.68460941
310, 0.314020574, 0., 5.69721174
311, -0.315427691, 0., 5.78401661312, 0.31517747, 0., 5.89609241
313, -0.315054536, 0., 5.88357019
314, 0.316314787, 0., 5.99555731
315, 0.318404227, 0., 6.09523869
316, 0.324144006, 0., 6.38569736
317, -0.306122333, 0., 6.49719858318, -0.310529053, 0., 6.59844065
319, 0.317961097, 0., 6.58154917
320, -0.314852864, 0., 6.69842958321, -0.31351608, 0., 6.89608908
322, 0.295243055, 0., 6.90154171
323, 0.105890259, 0., 7.30880499324, 0.301904917, 0., 7.10959387
325, 0.303527385, 0., 7.20823908
326, 0.402051926, 0., 7.30309677
327, -0.299800634, 0., 4.90010214328, -0.0902894214, 0., 7.29561043
329, -0.0986664221, 0., 4.79851437330, 0.0018088948, 0., 4.79800415
331, 0.222399965, 0., 5.29814672
332, 0.216678962, 0., 5.19791412333, -0.223152682, 0., 5.97148514
334, -0.220869288, 0., 6.0717802
335, -0.192721233, 0., 7.29373407
336, -0.299998164, 0., 4.79916191
337, 0.210820511, 0., 5.0974164
338, -0.220917225, 0., 5.47843266
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
88/111
77
339, 0.243320033, 0., 6.47432995
340, -0.218023121, 0., 6.1738553341, 0.186521545, 0., 6.78018904
342, 0.1101702, 0., 7.21433544
343, 0.204664022, 0., 7.1148324344, -0.200195268, 0., 7.08509207
345, -0.225005433, 0., 6.89159298
346, 0.202432424, 0., 4.69789648
347, 0.303624541, 0., 4.7969141348, 0.22168529, 0., 5.59982252
349, -0.190822065, 0., 7.18799162
350, 0.236797214, 0., 6.56837702
351, 0.2008463, 0., 7.01311731
352, -0.21349068, 0., 6.98613358353, 0.101697974, 0., 4.69795609
354, 0.304460764, 0., 4.89592218
355, -0.208076537, 0., 5.10710716356, -0.199524254, 0., 5.00600624
357, -0.223547459, 0., 5.38253593
358, 0.225628793, 0., 5.39937782359, 0.236854687, 0., 6.29055977
360, 0.242798716, 0., 6.38344049
361, -0.213846207, 0., 6.27833939362, -0.206707627, 0., 6.49696875
363, -0.199223369, 0., 4.79917574
364, -0.226176366, 0., 5.19723749365, -0.227950245, 0., 5.28914165
366, 0.224521562, 0., 5.49932766367, 0.221601427, 0., 5.70128012
368, -0.22309956, 0., 5.57635784
369, 0.22423631, 0., 5.90105867370, -0.22571373, 0., 5.67425919
371, 0.22282511, 0., 5.80190802
372, -0.22619018, 0., 5.77294731373, -0.225415528, 0., 5.87130213
374, 0.226192445, 0., 6.00080109
375, 0.232350484, 0., 6.19606352376, 0.229102418, 0., 6.10029364
377, -0.208279058, 0., 6.38662672
378, -0.226509944, 0., 6.70077181379, -0.217268422, 0., 6.60135412
380, 0.220396414, 0., 6.66632652
381, -0.229614273, 0., 6.79647446382, 0.196128488, 0., 6.90512657
383, 0.0182983484, 0., 7.2118907
384, 0.206072107, 0., 7.21169806
385, -0.198362261, 0., 4.90161896
386, 0.102622084, 0., 4.79722118
387, 0.203470454, 0., 4.79676676388, -0.0974442586, 0., 5.13574553
389, -0.098619014, 0., 7.06667614
390, -0.119545288, 0., 6.96879148391, -0.128163159, 0., 6.1582818
392, 0.109173544, 0., 7.12110043
393, 0.133301482, 0., 5.30742502394, 0.131907314, 0., 5.81121492
395, -0.139652088, 0., 5.66371918
396, -0.122907341, 0., 6.26307774
397, 0.138223693, 0., 6.63145018398, 0.122799806, 0., 5.20717192
399, -0.0742361471, 0., 7.17870903400, 0.204644904, 0., 4.89598274
401, -0.125714183, 0., 5.46752167
402, -0.131364495, 0., 6.05617237403, -0.143076956, 0., 6.88430548
404, 0.206699133, 0., 4.99664974
405, -0.0973391682, 0., 4.90246487
406, 0.136469558, 0., 5.5020051
407, 0.163831994, 0., 6.38763094
408, 0.171233878, 0., 6.46854591
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
89/111
78
409, 0.159717858, 0., 6.54961777
410, -0.143010616, 0., 6.70844793411, -0.156049699, 0., 5.20429611
412, 0.139882848, 0., 5.40635729
413, -0.130619228, 0., 5.369452414, 0.127579197, 0., 5.60603809
415, 0.1291866, 0., 5.71005011
416, -0.134329766, 0., 5.56901455
417, 0.136376977, 0., 6.0110755418, -0.138612881, 0., 5.76024199
419, 0.134122372, 0., 5.91191626
420, -0.13651605, 0., 5.85700512
421, 0.144195423, 0., 6.20690966
422, -0.134087384, 0., 5.95578814423, 0.152796224, 0., 6.30109358
424, 0.139660269, 0., 6.1107173
425, -0.113268718, 0., 6.37452126426, -0.0975690931, 0., 6.5010314
427, -0.148312464, 0., 6.79710388
428, -0.12851657, 0., 6.61295128429, 0.0305773336, 0., 6.66694832
430, 0.0714686736, 0., 6.75505114
431, 0.0954950154, 0., 6.91913986432, 0.0903138742, 0., 6.82106161
433, 0.103952818, 0., 4.897964
434, -0.0581134595, 0., 5.24749279435, 0.0296035167, 0., 5.2230773
436, -0.0235007312, 0., 5.45896435437, -0.0394197069, 0., 6.14110708
438, 0.0842929482, 0., 6.40796709
439, -0.0695208237, 0., 6.80322504440, 0.0592189096, 0., 5.41695166
441, 0.0543499924, 0., 5.49868059
442, 0.0251491554, 0., 5.61175299443, -0.0447129048, 0., 5.93976307
444, -0.0469984338, 0., 5.8409977
445, -0.033807084, 0., 6.24395227446, 0.0498633273, 0., 6.12507343
447, 0.112137116, 0., 6.465343
448, 0.0102930805, 0., 6.74083328449, -0.000287796778, 0., 7.03742981
450, 0.0422273129, 0., 5.82510805
451, -0.0423180871, 0., 6.04010296452, 0.106647633, 0., 5.00105667
453, 0.00298698479, 0., 4.90101719
454, -0.0636882186, 0., 6.72270203
455, 0.0052099661, 0., 6.46184301
456, 0.0445605069, 0., 5.32480288
457, -0.0420513712, 0., 5.35015059458, -0.0589031056, 0., 5.65282202
459, 0.038012702, 0., 5.72390032
460, -0.0526096337, 0., 5.57187128461, -0.0504724607, 0., 5.74457073
462, 0.0445855856, 0., 5.92536259
463, 0.0469786003, 0., 6.0254817464, 0.0651964545, 0., 6.32155228
465, 0.0554221906, 0., 6.22453547
466, -0.021974273, 0., 6.35031176
467, -0.0482959114, 0., 6.63777971468, -0.0203869492, 0., 6.55431509
469, -0.0783420578, 0., 6.87100172470, -0.0177761577, 0., 6.92647791
471, 0.00460041501, 0., 6.82224131
472, 0.00513232173, 0., 5.00768137473, 0.0167262461, 0., 7.13218832
474, -0.0966288298, 0., 5.01241636
475, 0.0115827657, 0., 5.11680508
476, 0.101649359, 0., 7.02168989
477, 0.400879443, 0., 4.59934616
478, 0.108288564, 0., 6.70781231
-
8/13/2019 King Final Report
90/111
79
479, 0.112396933, 0., 5.10517406
480, 0.0559308752, 0., 6.59166718481, -0.140449628, 0., 5.27679873
482, 0.0822723955, 0., 6.51833534
483, -0.39453128, 0.0404181406, 4.4025116484, -0.294307023, 0.0310180821, 4.39972687
485, -0.195317686, 0.0211791564, 4.39685583
486, -0.0981834605, 0.0110054938, 4.39340591
487, 0.0974388197, -0.0110404696, 4.3922596488, 0.196074381, -0.0214761999, 4.39582109
489, 0.29577893, -0.0310798828, 4.40002489
490, -0.389100462, 0.0795408636, 4.3074441
491, -0.291077256, 0.0610979162, 4.30242586
492, -0.194597781, 0.0423649475, 4.29530096493, -0.100957528, 0.0233076978, 4.28333521
494, -0.00332703814, 0.000786339573, 4.27837133
495, 0.095376201, -0.0224310998, 4.27942276496, 0.292506605, -0.0619109347, 4.30082226
497, -0.38214317, 0.11793372, 4.21415281
498, -0.289467514, 0.090895541, 4.20945358499, -0.202075586, 0.0650578141, 4.20256901
500, -0.11561846, 0.0423492603, 4.16471672
501, 0.0976936817, -0.0368712172, 4.15537786502, 0.198754832, -0.067814976, 4.18600655
503, 0.291765392, -0.0932855457, 4.20449114
504, 0.385729671, -0.118881494, 4.21451283505, -0.370616794, 0.154640973, 4.12252522
506, -0.281834334, 0.117777593, 4.12200212507, -0.0968274847, 0.0492477678, 4.0506916
508, -0.0110924458, 0.00555647956, 4.05654287
509, 0.139335796, -0.0686392635, 4.06290531510, 0.215747297, -0.0993557125, 4.08788395
511, 0.294349134, -0.125744611, 4.11446762
512, -0.353612244, 0.189381301, 4.03046989513, -0.16724059, 0.110600732, 3.94203758
514, -0.0869640633, 0.0568458512, 3.94714236
515, -0.00753175607, 0.00488119386, 3.95089102516, 0.0717929453, -0.046249371, 3.95350266
517, 0.152061835, -0.0962316468, 3.96120858
518, 0.243869111, -0.148629859, 3.97731876519, -0.332861006, 0.222312957, 3.9376936
520, -0.231885433, 0.189902529, 3.84473753
521, -0.154716372, 0.12640582, 3.84584355522, -0.0786142051, 0.0640072823, 3.8474617
523, 0.0728859231, -0.0588177741, 3.8516171
524, 0.149941236, -0.120037109, 3.85534334
525, 0.227919579, -0.181463853, 3.85790133
526, 0.39161098, -0.0797342956, 4.30819273
527, 0.333999455, -0.21827659, 3.94724059528, 0.378465265, -0.157423183, 4.12358427
529, 0.396312237, -0.0401718915, 4.40353394
530, 0.364216506, -0.1934174, 4.03382397531, 0.307291895, -0.248437062, 3.85075688
532, -0.309068471, 0.253469706, 3.84407544
533, -0.000869911979, 9.93500