kow kuroda's talk at jcla 16 workshop: methodology in cognitive linguistics, 2015

142
理論言語学の方法論を 証拠に基づく医療 (EBM) との比較を 通じて見直す* 杏林大学医学部 16回認知言語学会 2015-09-12 (土曜日), 同志社大学 *「第9回言語学・自然言語処理合同研究会 2015/ 09/06」での同名の発表の簡略版

Upload: kow-kuroda

Post on 12-Apr-2017

255 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • (EBM)

    *

    162015-09-12 (),

    *9 2015/09/06

  • jcla16 ws room3

    ()

    2

  • jcla16 ws room3

    NICT/

    open

    closed

    3

  • jcla16 ws room3

    ()

    (EBM)

    EBM

    EBM

    4

  • jcla16 ws room3

    9 2015/09/06

    URL

    clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~kkuroda/presentations/kuroda-2015-JCLA16WS-slides.pdf

    5

    http://clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~kkuroda/presentations/kuroda-2015-JCLA16WS-slides.pdf

  • ()

  • jcla16 ws room3

    =>

    7

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 1/3

    (e.g., NLP, ) ()

    8

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 2/3

    (observation) (description) (exaplantion, account)

    ()

    9

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 3/3() (overly) intuition-based authority-based

    1, 2

    10

  • jcla16 ws room3

    (evidence-based medicine: EBM)

    (())

    11

  • jcla16 ws room3

    ()

    12

  • Evidence-based Medicine

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM 1/2EBM ()

    ()

    (confounding)

    (e.g., )

    14

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM 2/2EBM

    15

  • jcla16 ws room3

    [1] (vitamin D)

    [2] Ignaz Philipp Semmelweiss* (1818-1815)

    1 ()

    17

    *Semmelweis Ignc Flp

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/4 , pp. 82-84

    18

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/4 , pp. 82-84

    19

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/4 , pp. 82-84

    20

  • jcla16 ws room3

    4/4 , pp. 82-84

    21

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2 , p. 85

    22

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2 , p. 85

    23

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2

    24

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2

    25

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Archibold Cochrane (19091988)*

    :

    :

    27

    *Tim Harford TED : Trial, error and the Gold complex.

  • jcla16 ws room3

    diagnosis

    Atul Gawande: Complications.

    Lisa Sander: Every Patient Tells a Story.

    Jerome Groopman: How Doctors Think.

    (big data)

    28

  • Evidence-based Medicine

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM

    EBM

    : = : /

    30

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM

    31

    Grade

    A

    B

    C1

    C2

    D

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM A, B, C1, C2, D

    32

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM/

    33

    Level

    1a

    + +

    1b1

    + +

    2a

    prospective/concurrent cohort

    study +

    2b

    retrospective/historical cohort

    study +

    3 retrospective study +

    4

    5 6

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, 6

    34

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Level 6 Level 5

    Level 3

    Level 3

    35

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Seven alternatives to EBM

    36

    Basis for decisions Marker Measuring device

    Unit of measurement

    Evidence Ramdomized controlled trial Meta-analysis Odds ratio

    Eminence Radiance of white hair LuminometerOptical density

    Vehemence Level of stridency Audiometer Decibels

    Eloquence (or elegance) /

    Smoothness of tongue or nap of

    suitTeflometer Adhesion score

    Providence Level of religious fervorSextant to measure

    angle of genuflaection

    International units of

    piety

    Diffidence Level of gloom Nihilometer Sighs

    Nervousness Litigation phobia levelEvery conceivable

    testBank

    balanceConfidence Bravado Sweat test No sweat

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Seven alternatives to EBM 1/2

    Isaacs Fitzgerald (1999) EBM :

    Eminence based medicine The more senior the colleague, the less importance he or she placed on the need for anything as mundane as evidence. Experience, it seems, is worth any amount of evidence. These colleagues have a touching faith in clinical experience, which has been defined as making the same mistakes with increasing confidence over an impressive number of years. The eminent physicians white hair and balding pate are called the halo effect.

    Vehemence based medicine The substitution of volume for evidence is an effective technique for brow beating your more timorous colleagues and for convincing relatives of your ability.

    37

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Seven alternatives to EBM 2/3

    Isaacs Fitzgerald (1999) EBM :

    Eloquence based medicineThe year round suntan, carnation in the button hole, silk tie, Armani suit, and tongue should all be equally smooth. Sartorial elegance and verbal eloquence are powerful substitutes for evidence.

    Providence based medicine If the caring practitioner has no idea of what to do next, the decision may be best left in the hands of the Almighty. Too many clinicians, unfortunately, are unable to resist giving God a hand with the decision making.

    38

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Seven alternatives to EBM 3/3

    Isaacs Fitzgerald (1999) EBM :

    Diffidence based medicine Some doctors see a problem and look for an answer. Others merely see a problem. The diffident doctor may do nothing from a sense of despair. This, of course, may be better than doing.

    Nervousness based medicine Fear of litigation is a powerful stimulus to overinvestigation and overtreatment. In an atmosphere of litigation phobia, the only bad test is the test you didnt think of ordering.

    Confidence based medicine This is restricted to surgeons (table).

    39

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM7

    40

    Classification

    Eminence-based

    /

    Vehemence-based

    Eloquence (or elegance)-

    based

    Providence-based

    Diffidence-based

    Nervousness-based

    Confidence-based

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Confidence-based surgeon

    41

    Classification

    Eminence-based

    /

    Vehemence-based

    Eloquence (or elegance)-

    based

    Providence-based

    Diffidence-based

    Nervousness-based

    Confidence-based

    /

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM Evidence-based Linguistics: EBL

    EBL

    42

  • Evidence-based Linguistics

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM 1/3

    1.

    44

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM 2/32.

    EBM

    Level 6

    45

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBM 3/3

    ()

    46

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBL 1/2

    EBL

    positives negatives

    acceptability judg(e)ment ()

    A = f(E x C x R) [A, E, C, R , , , ()]

    47

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBL 2/2

    =

    48

  • jcla16 ws room3

    (e.g, )

    ()

    ()

    indirect negative evidence

    (Stefanowitsch 2006, 2008; Clark and Lappin 2009; Yang to appear) =

    50

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/3, p. 2

    =>

    51

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3

    (10)

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    , Loc. 1003

    52

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3

    ()

    ()

    ()

    ()

    , Loc. 1003

    53

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2

    ()

    =

    54

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2

    ()

    () W C W

    C W

    (/)

    55

  • EBM

  • jcla16 ws room3

    (i) (ii)

    1. D

    D = BCCWJ

    2. D S

    3. S T

    4. S U

    5. T U

    A: T = U

    B: T U

    C: T U

    CMTA, B, C

    3 4

    57

  • jcla16 ws room3

    I. , II. , III.

    EBM

    EBM EBL

    58

  • Thank you for your attention.

    Dkuji vm za pozornost. Ksznm a figyelmeted. .

  • jcla16 ws room3

    References 1/2 (1999): . .

    , (2011). (): . In 17, 11391142.

    (2012). In , Vol. 27, No. 3 , pp. 326332. 2012.

    (2015). : . , .

    , D. (2014): . . [Gilbert, D. (2010): Stumbling on Happiness. ]

    , K. (2011): . . [Fung (2010): Numbers Rule Your World}, 1st edition. McGraw-Hill Education, 2010]

    , M. (2009). . . [McCarthy, Michael (2004). Bayesian Methods for Ecology. ]

    , K. J. (2004): : . . [Rothman, Kenneth J. (2002): Epidemiology: An Introduction. ]

    60

  • jcla16 ws room3

    References 2/2Cochrane, Archibold and Max Blythe (1989). One Mans Medicine: An Autobiography of Professor Archie Cochrane. BMJ Publishing Group.

    Isaacs, D. and D. Fitzgerald: Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine. British Medical Journal 319: 1618, 1999.

    Kuroda, Kow (2009). Pattern lattice as a model for linguistic knowledge and performance. In Proc. of the 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Vol.~1, pp. ,278287.

    Stefanowitcsh, Anatol (2006). Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(1): 61--77.

    Stefanowitsch, Anatol (2008). Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3): 513531.

    Yang, Charles (to appear). Negative knowledge from positive evidence. Language, ??(??):??.

    61

  • I, II, III, IV

  • I

  • jcla16 ws room3

    64

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/3

    65

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3 (=)

    () ()

    66

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3 ()

    Part I 67

  • jcla16 ws room3

    =>

    68

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 1/3

    (e.g., NLP, ) ()

    69

  • jcla16 ws room3

    (aka )

    70

  • jcla16 ws room3

    ()

    NLP

    ()

    71

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 2/3

    (observation) (description) (exaplantion, account)

    ()

    72

  • jcla16 ws room3

    N. Chomsky ()

    73

  • jcla16 ws room3

    , ,

    D

    D (proper classification) C

    C (proper representation) R

    D C/R =

    C/D C/D

    74

  • jcla16 ws room3

    , , 1/3

    (confirmation bias)

    () T

    T

    () T

    75

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/3 [][] () () ()

    DanielGilbert,Loc.1818

    [K.K.:]

    76

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3[][][] [Sir Francis Bacon] []

    DanielGilbert,Loc.1822

    77

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3 [ Cicero ][][][][]

    DanielGilbert,Loc.1818

    78

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1HIV/

    : , p. 84.

    79

    m 38 37 75

    + n 1 7 8

    N = m+n 39 38 77

    m/N 0.026 0.184 0.104

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2

    T (e.g., ) (e.g., B3) T

    (B2)

    positives negatives

    (B2)

    false positives false positives

    80

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2

    Cicero/Bacon

    81

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2a 1/n

    B2:

    B3:

    C2:

    C3:

    82

    +

    m 17 11 28

    n 13 9 22

    N = m+n 30 20 50

    m/N 0.567 0.550 0.560

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2b 2/n

    B2:

    B3:

    C2:

    C3:

    83

    +

    m 25 17 42

    n 5 3 8

    N = m+n 30 20 50

    m/N 0.833 0.850 0.840

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2c 3/n

    B2:

    B3:

    C2:

    C3:

    84

    +

    m 25 3 28

    n 5 17 22

    N = m+n 30 20 50

    m/N 0.833 0.150 0.560

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2a, b, c Cicero/Bacon 2c

    2b

    85

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 1/3P: ()

    x [ metaphor(x) => cross-domain-mapping(x) ]

    P: x x

    x [ cross-domain-mapping(x) => metaphor(x)]

    86

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 2/3 S, T

    S: x [ cross-domain-mapping(x) => metaphor(x) ]

    T: x [ cross-domain-mapping(x) => metaphor(x) ]

    (P) P

    87

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 3/3

    P: x x

    x [ metaphor(x) => cross-domain-mapping(x)]

    P: x x

    x [cross-domain-mapping(x) => metaphor(x)]

    88

  • jcla16 ws room3

    , , 2/3

    exclusive classification = hard clustering

    A, B, AB, O

    89

  • jcla16 ws room3

    ABO

    Venn (matrix)Hasse

    90

    +A A

    +B AB B

    B A O

    U

    +A +B

    : A: B: AB: O

    Venn

    Hasse

  • jcla16 ws room3

    tree structure

    91

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) /

    Ganter, B. and R. Wille (1999). Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (Translated by C. Franzke).

    Ganter, B., G. Stumme, and R. Wille (eds.) (2005). Formal Concept Analysis: Foundations and Applications. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    FCA Concept Explorer 1.3

    http://conexp.sourceforge.net/

    java -Dfile.encoding=utf-8 -jar conexp.jar

    92

    http://conexp.sourceforge.net/

  • jcla16 ws room3

    , , 3/3

    (= )

    D C/R

    overgeneralizations

    93

  • jcla16 ws room3

    Construction Grammar

    2

    Remarks

    =

    94

  • jcla16 ws room3

    A.

    B.

    A (=)

    = ,

    B

    95

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 2/3

    () () () ()

    ()

    96

  • jcla16 ws room3

    () 3/3() (overly) intuition-based authority-based

    1, 2

    97

  • Evidence-based Linguistics

    II

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBL

    1.

    =

    2.

    99

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBL 1/2

    1

    R

    R () (=)

    100

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/31

    ??

    1

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d. ??

    2

    a.

    b.

    3

    a.

    b. ?*

    c.

    d. ?

    (bracketing paradox)

    101

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3 1

    a. {i. ; ii. ; iii. ; vi. ; v. ; vi. }

    b. {i. ; ii. ; iii. }

    c.

    2

    a. {i. ; ii. ; iii. }

    b.

    c.

    102

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3RT

    a.

    b. ?

    c. ?

    d.

    b, c ()

    103

  • jcla16 ws room3

    pattern lattice (PLM)

    PLM Kuroda (2009), (2011)

    104

  • jcla16 ws room3

    EBL 2/2

    / acceptability judg(e)ment =

    S

    NICT (2008-2010)

    105

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 1/6F1

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

    F2

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

    G1

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

    G2

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

    106

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 2/6

    16 4 F1, F2, G1, G2 12

    i.

    ii.

    iii.

    iv.

    i, ii, iii, iv 3, 2, 1, 0

    107

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1.

    2. N=16

    3. w

    1 108

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 3/6

    109

    1: E x R r av. stdev

    Expression Index r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11 r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 av. stdev F1a 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 G2c 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.88 0.50 G2b 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.81 0.54 F2a 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.63 0.50 F2b 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 0.63 F1b 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.38 0.81 G1c 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.13 0.89 F2c 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.06 0.77 F1c 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 0.89 F2d 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.82 G1b 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.03 G2d 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.97 F1d 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.75 1.00 G1d 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.75 0.77 G1a 3.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.44 1.21 G2a 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.06 0.77

    av. 2.75 2.56 2.50 2.19 2.56 2.25 2.50 2.13 2.00 1.69 1.81 2.13 1.63 1.75 1.94 2.00stdev 0.58 0.73 1.03 0.91 0.81 0.86 0.63 0.96 0.73 1.14 0.91 0.96 1.02 0.86 1.12 0.89

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 4/6

    110

    2: R x E F av. stdev

    Rater F1a G2c G2b F2a F2b F1b G1c F2c F1c F2d G2d G1b G1d F1d G1a G2a av stdevr3 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 1.03r5 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.56 0.81r4 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.19 0.91r2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.56 0.73r6 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.25 0.86

    r12 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.13 0.96r7 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.50 0.63

    r10 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.14r15 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 1.94 1.12r8 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.13 0.96

    r13 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.63 1.02r9 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.73

    r14 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.75 0.86r11 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 1.81 0.91r1 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.75 0.58

    r16 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.89av 3.00 2.88 2.81 2.63 2.50 2.38 2.13 2.06 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.44 1.06 1.06 1.06stdev 0.00 0.50 0.54 0.50 0.63 0.81 0.89 0.77 0.89 0.82 0.97 1.03 0.77 1.00 1.21 0.77 0.77 0.77

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 5/61 E x R E

    1: {F1a, G2c, G2b}

    2: {F2a, F2b, F1b, G1c, G1b}

    3: {F2c, F1c, F2d, G1d, F1d, G2d}

    4: {G1a, G2a}

    111

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1 6/61 E x R R

    1: {r1, r2, r5, , r6}

    2: {r16}

    3: {r8, r10, r9, , r13, r15}

    112

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/4

    vs

    ()

    ()

    22

    113

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/4

    1

    =

    E R

    ri R e1, e2, (ei E)

    114

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/4

    R 3

    2 = {r16}

    115

  • jcla16 ws room3

    4/4 2

    = ?

    E R

    ei E r1, r2, (ri R)

    116

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2 (2015)

    NN5

    N1-N2

    BCCWJ//2

    H, M, L

    H, M, L 4 XY (X, Y2)

    i) X=Y ii)

    N1-N2

    N2

    X, X

    117

  • jcla16 ws room3

    p

    1. S

    si ai vi

    2. p S si (i) si (ii) si

    p si ap vp

    3. |ai ap| Ap |vi vp| Vp

    4. Ap, Vp H L

    Ap < AH, H < Ap < L, L < Ap, Vp < H, H < Vp < L, L < Vp

    H: M: L:

    118

  • III

  • jcla16 ws room3

    confounding

    120

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/3

    EBM

    EBM (Hickery and Roberts 2011) /

    121

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3

    /

    122

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3

    I. ()

    II. ()

    NLP(Big Data) I II

    123

  • IV

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2

    /

    /

    125

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2

    (2012):

    126

  • jcla16 ws room3

    (NLP) (Ling)

    127

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/3, pp. 323-324

    [][]

    []

    128

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3 [] [][][]MIT[][][][]

    129

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3

    [][][]

    130

  • jcla16 ws room3

    ()

    ()()

    //

    131

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2,p.383

    [][][][][...][][][][]

    132

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2,p.383

    [][]

    [][][]

    133

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1

    134

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2,p.285

    [Federalistpapers][][=][=]

    135

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2

    ,p.285

    [][][]

    [][][]

    136

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1

    /

    137

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/3

    ,pp.393-394

    [][][][][][][...]

    138

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/3

    ,pp.393-394

    [...][][][]

    139

  • jcla16 ws room3

    3/3

    ,pp.393-394

    M[][...]

    [...][][...][]

    MarkovChain MonteCarlo=MCMC

    140

  • jcla16 ws room3

    1/2

    /

    141

  • jcla16 ws room3

    2/2

    !!

    /

    142